[Bug 1138905] Re: managesieve segfault

2013-04-08 Thread Bernhard Seibold
While in my experience, bugs in Ubuntu get ignored anyway, maybe the
little patch icon will help?

** Attachment added: "6ceeb6421231.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1138905/+attachment/3630446/+files/6ceeb6421231.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905

Title:
  managesieve segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1138905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1138905] Re: managesieve segfault

2013-03-11 Thread Bernhard Seibold
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #688197
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688197

** Also affects: dovecot (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688197
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905

Title:
  managesieve segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1138905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1098736] Re: Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

2013-03-01 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Ok, I'll add the patch as an attachment even though I doubt this will
change the fact that no one seems to care.

** Patch added: "qpsmtpd.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpsmtpd/+bug/1098736/+attachment/3553511/+files/qpsmtpd.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098736

Title:
  Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpsmtpd/+bug/1098736/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1138905] [NEW] managesieve segfault

2013-03-01 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

managesieve segfaults reproducibly when trying to edit a script with the
Thunderbird Sieve plugin.

Analyzing the segfault with gdb revealed that the issue is already fixed 
upstream:
http://hg.rename-it.nl/dovecot-2.1-pigeonhole/rev/6ceeb6421231

Please include the patch or update to a newer version.

Thanks!

** Affects: dovecot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "apport.dovecot-managesieved.5h31ls.apport"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905/+attachment/3553510/+files/apport.dovecot-managesieved.5h31ls.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1138905

Title:
  managesieve segfault

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+bug/1138905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1098736] Re: Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

2013-01-11 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Oh, I forgot to mention, an excerpt from the documentation of the plugin
(perldoc /usr/share/qpsmtpd/plugins/queue/postfix-queue):

   FLAG_MAP_OK
   This flag enables the use of other recipient mappings (e.g.  
virtual_alias_maps) in postfix'
   cleanup.

   FLAG_MASK_EXTERNAL
   This flag mask combines FLAG_FILTER, FLAG_MILTER (only in postfix >= 
2.3) FLAG_BCC_OK and
   FLAG_MAP_OK and is used by postfix for external messages.  This is 
probably what you want to use.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098736

Title:
  Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpsmtpd/+bug/1098736/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1098736] [NEW] Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

2013-01-11 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

Debconf allows to select a backend, and one of those backends is
Postfix. In this case the line

queue/postfix-queue

is written to /etc/qpsmtpd/debian-queue-method. However, if you're using
a virtual mail configuration with Postfix, this only works partially,
the virtual_alias_map is ignored. To alleviate this, the parameter
FLAG_MASK_EXTERNAL is required. So please change debconf to include that
flag for Postfix:

queue/postfix-queue FLAG_MASK_EXTERNAL

The patch for this:

--- qpsmtpd.postinst   2013-01-11 23:09:27.0 +0100
+++ qpsmtpd.postinst2013-01-11 23:09:41.0 +0100
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
if [ "$QUEUE_PLUGIN" = "exim" ] ; then
echo "queue/exim-bsmtp"
elif [ "$QUEUE_PLUGIN" = "postfix" ] ; then
-   echo "queue/postfix-queue"
+   echo "queue/postfix-queue FLAG_MASK_EXTERNAL"
elif [ "$QUEUE_PLUGIN" = "proxy" ] ; then
echo -n "queue/smtp-forward "
echo "$QUEUE_PROXY_DESTINATION" | tr ":" " "

** Affects: qpsmtpd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1098736

Title:
  Problem with debconf, Postfix and virtual users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qpsmtpd/+bug/1098736/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 933107] Re: [new-upstream]Gajim 0.15 beta 4

2012-03-20 Thread Bernhard Seibold
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 959365 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/959365

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 959365
   [new-upstream]Gajim 0.15

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933107

Title:
  [new-upstream]Gajim 0.15 beta 4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gajim/+bug/933107/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 786009] Re: Wrong charset in emails

2011-05-20 Thread Bernhard Seibold
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786009

Title:
  Wrong charset in emails

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 786009] [NEW] Wrong charset in emails

2011-05-20 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades

The emails sent by version 0.62ubuntu1 are localized, but the encoding
is wrong, at least for the german translation. MTA in use is postfix
2.8.1-1~maverick1, /usr/bin/mail is provided by bsd-mailx
8.1.2-0.20100314cvs-1

In the subject, the german umlaut "ΓΌ" is encoded as quoted printable =C3=BC 
which is UTF-8, but the encoding is erroneously specified to be ISO-8859-1.
There is no charset specified for the body, but it's encoded as UTF-8 too. (not 
quoted printable, but 8-bit)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: unattended-upgrades 0.62ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-28.50-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat May 21 00:59:35 2011
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/786009

Title:
  Wrong charset in emails

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 682662] Re: pam-auth-update ignores debconf settings

2010-11-29 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Hm, didn't think about that. Makes sense though.

In case anyone else runs into this, my workaround is to delete
/etc/pam.d/common-* before running pam-auth-update. Still requires
special handling in the install scripts, but at least the config is in
debconf where it belongs.

-- 
pam-auth-update ignores debconf settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682662
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661212] Re: crash after kswapd page allocation failure

2010-11-29 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Vanilla 2.6.35.7 still up and running, no crashes. Switching back to
2.6.32-26-virtual now.

-- 
crash after kswapd page allocation failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 682662] [NEW] pam-auth-update ignores debconf settings

2010-11-29 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

pam-auth-update ignores the current debconf-settings. This makes it
impossible to do automatically configure pam in noninteractive
installations.

Demonstration:

~ # debconf-get-selections | grep libpam-runtime
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/override boolean true
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/conflictserror   
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/no_profiles_chosen   error   
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/profiles multiselect krb5, unix, ldap, 
tmpdir, gnome-keyring, consolekit
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/you-had-no-auth  error   

~ # DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive pam-auth-update

~ # debconf-get-selections | grep libpam-runtime
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/override boolean false
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/conflictserror   
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/no_profiles_chosen   error   
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/profiles multiselect krb5, unix, winbind, 
ldap
libpam-runtime  libpam-runtime/you-had-no-auth  error

** Affects: pam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
pam-auth-update ignores debconf settings
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682662
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661212] Re: crash after kswapd page allocation failure

2010-10-15 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Running vanilla 2.6.35.7 now, and waiting for the bug to occur.

-- 
crash after kswapd page allocation failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661245] [NEW] Symlink to library in wrong package

2010-10-15 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

The symlink

/usr/lib/libglut.so -> libglut.so.3.9.0

is part of package freeglut3-dev instead of freeglut3. Because of this,
the linker doesn't find libglut if the -dev package isn't installed.

** Affects: freeglut (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Symlink to library in wrong package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661245
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661212] Re: crash after kswapd page allocation failure

2010-10-15 Thread Bernhard Seibold
** Description changed:

- This seems to be the same issue as Debian Bug #576838
+ This seems to be the same issue as debbugs #576838
  http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576838
  
  [770660.316022] __ratelimit: 80 callbacks suppressed
  [770660.316027] kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
  [770660.316031] Pid: 36, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-25-server #44-Ubuntu
  [770660.316034] Call Trace:
  [770660.316036][] 
__alloc_pages_slowpath+0x56e/0x580
  [770660.316052]  [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x171/0x180
  [770660.316057]  [] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0
  [770660.316063]  [] try_fill_recv+0x182/0x200
  [770660.316067]  [] virtnet_poll+0x10d/0x160
  [770660.316073]  [] net_rx_action+0x10f/0x250
  [770660.316078]  [] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x1e0
  [770660.316082]  [] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x60/0x170
  [770660.316087]  [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
  [770660.316090]  [] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
  [770660.316093]  [] irq_exit+0x85/0x90
  [770660.316098]  [] do_IRQ+0x75/0xf0
  [770660.316101]  [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11
  [770660.316103][] ? __remove_mapping+0x88/0x110
  [770660.316110]  [] ? shrink_page_list+0x2ad/0x600
  [770660.316114]  [] ? shrink_inactive_list+0x30e/0x810
  [770660.316124]  [] ? d_kill+0x68/0x80
  [770660.316128]  [] ? prune_one_dentry+0x5c/0x110
  [770660.316131]  [] ? __shrink_dcache_sb+0x244/0x2c0
  [770660.316135]  [] ? determine_dirtyable_memory+0x1a/0x30
  [770660.316139]  [] ? get_dirty_limits+0x27/0x2f0
  [770660.316142]  [] ? shrink_list+0x91/0xf0
  [770660.316145]  [] ? shrink_zone+0x197/0x240
  [770660.316148]  [] ? balance_pgdat+0x659/0x6d0
  [770660.316152]  [] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x50
  [770660.316155]  [] ? kswapd+0xfe/0x150
  [770660.316159]  [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
  [770660.316162]  [] ? kswapd+0x0/0x150
  [770660.316165]  [] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
  [770660.316169]  [] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
  [770660.316172]  [] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
  [770660.316175]  [] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
  [770660.316176] Mem-Info:
  [770660.316178] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
  [770660.316181] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
  [770660.316183] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
  [770660.316185] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
  [770660.316188] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 162
  [770660.316190] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 156
  [770660.316195] active_anon:2751 inactive_anon:11810 isolated_anon:0
  [770660.316196]  active_file:33607 inactive_file:182301 isolated_file:35
  [770660.316197]  unevictable:0 dirty:21611 writeback:500 unstable:0
  [770660.316198]  free:1369 slab_reclaimable:11657 slab_unreclaimable:2756
  [770660.316205]  mapped:1927 shmem:64 pagetables:518 bounce:0
  [770660.316208] Node 0 DMA free:3988kB min:60kB low:72kB high:88kB 
active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:132kB inactive_file:11080kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15348kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:1564kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB 
slab_reclaimable:192kB slab_unreclaimable:152kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB 
unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
  [770660.316218] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 994 994 994
  [770660.316222] Node 0 DMA32 free:1488kB min:4000kB low:5000kB high:6000kB 
active_anon:11004kB inactive_anon:47240kB active_file:134296kB 
inactive_file:718124kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):140kB 
present:1018060kB mlocked:0kB dirty:84880kB writeback:2000kB mapped:7708kB 
shmem:256kB slab_reclaimable:46436kB slab_unreclaimable:10872kB 
kernel_stack:1504kB pagetables:2072kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB 
pages_scanned:99 all_unreclaimable? no
  [770660.316233] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
  [770660.316236] Node 0 DMA: 1*4kB 2*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 11*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 
1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3988kB
  [770660.316247] Node 0 DMA32: 94*4kB 5*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 6*64kB 1*128kB 
2*256kB 0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1488kB
  [770660.316257] 216001 total pagecache pages
  [770660.316258] 0 pages in swap cache
  [770660.316261] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
  [770660.316262] Free swap  = 0kB
  [770660.316264] Total swap = 0kB
  [770660.320351] 262139 pages RAM
  [770660.320353] 6263 pages reserved
  [770660.320355] 195097 pages shared
  [770660.320356] 62534 pages non-shared
  [770660.320455] kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
  [770660.320459] Pid: 36, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-25-server #44-Ubuntu
  [770660.320462] Call Trace:
  [770660.320465][] 
__alloc_pages_slowpath+0x56e/0x580
  [770660.320476]  [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x171/0x180
  [770660.320481]  [] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0
  [770660.320485]  [] try_fill_recv+0x182/0x200
  [770660.320489]  [] virtnet_poll+0x10d/0x160
  [770660.320494]  [] net_rx_action+0x10f/0x250
  [770660.320498]  [] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x1e0
  [770660.320502]  [] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x60/0x170
  [770660.320506]  [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
  [770660.320509]  [] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
  [

[Bug 661212] Re: crash after kswapd page allocation failure

2010-10-15 Thread Bernhard Seibold

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #576838
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576838

** Also affects: linux-2.6 (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576838
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
crash after kswapd page allocation failure
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661212
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661212] [NEW] crash after kswapd page allocation failure

2010-10-15 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

This seems to be the same issue as Debian Bug #576838
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576838

[770660.316022] __ratelimit: 80 callbacks suppressed
[770660.316027] kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
[770660.316031] Pid: 36, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-25-server #44-Ubuntu
[770660.316034] Call Trace:
[770660.316036][] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x56e/0x580
[770660.316052]  [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x171/0x180
[770660.316057]  [] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0
[770660.316063]  [] try_fill_recv+0x182/0x200
[770660.316067]  [] virtnet_poll+0x10d/0x160
[770660.316073]  [] net_rx_action+0x10f/0x250
[770660.316078]  [] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x1e0
[770660.316082]  [] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x60/0x170
[770660.316087]  [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[770660.316090]  [] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
[770660.316093]  [] irq_exit+0x85/0x90
[770660.316098]  [] do_IRQ+0x75/0xf0
[770660.316101]  [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11
[770660.316103][] ? __remove_mapping+0x88/0x110
[770660.316110]  [] ? shrink_page_list+0x2ad/0x600
[770660.316114]  [] ? shrink_inactive_list+0x30e/0x810
[770660.316124]  [] ? d_kill+0x68/0x80
[770660.316128]  [] ? prune_one_dentry+0x5c/0x110
[770660.316131]  [] ? __shrink_dcache_sb+0x244/0x2c0
[770660.316135]  [] ? determine_dirtyable_memory+0x1a/0x30
[770660.316139]  [] ? get_dirty_limits+0x27/0x2f0
[770660.316142]  [] ? shrink_list+0x91/0xf0
[770660.316145]  [] ? shrink_zone+0x197/0x240
[770660.316148]  [] ? balance_pgdat+0x659/0x6d0
[770660.316152]  [] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x50
[770660.316155]  [] ? kswapd+0xfe/0x150
[770660.316159]  [] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
[770660.316162]  [] ? kswapd+0x0/0x150
[770660.316165]  [] ? kthread+0x96/0xa0
[770660.316169]  [] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
[770660.316172]  [] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[770660.316175]  [] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
[770660.316176] Mem-Info:
[770660.316178] Node 0 DMA per-cpu:
[770660.316181] CPU0: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[770660.316183] CPU1: hi:0, btch:   1 usd:   0
[770660.316185] Node 0 DMA32 per-cpu:
[770660.316188] CPU0: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 162
[770660.316190] CPU1: hi:  186, btch:  31 usd: 156
[770660.316195] active_anon:2751 inactive_anon:11810 isolated_anon:0
[770660.316196]  active_file:33607 inactive_file:182301 isolated_file:35
[770660.316197]  unevictable:0 dirty:21611 writeback:500 unstable:0
[770660.316198]  free:1369 slab_reclaimable:11657 slab_unreclaimable:2756
[770660.316205]  mapped:1927 shmem:64 pagetables:518 bounce:0
[770660.316208] Node 0 DMA free:3988kB min:60kB low:72kB high:88kB 
active_anon:0kB inactive_anon:0kB active_file:132kB inactive_file:11080kB 
unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):0kB present:15348kB 
mlocked:0kB dirty:1564kB writeback:0kB mapped:0kB shmem:0kB 
slab_reclaimable:192kB slab_unreclaimable:152kB kernel_stack:0kB pagetables:0kB 
unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB pages_scanned:0 all_unreclaimable? no
[770660.316218] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 994 994 994
[770660.316222] Node 0 DMA32 free:1488kB min:4000kB low:5000kB high:6000kB 
active_anon:11004kB inactive_anon:47240kB active_file:134296kB 
inactive_file:718124kB unevictable:0kB isolated(anon):0kB isolated(file):140kB 
present:1018060kB mlocked:0kB dirty:84880kB writeback:2000kB mapped:7708kB 
shmem:256kB slab_reclaimable:46436kB slab_unreclaimable:10872kB 
kernel_stack:1504kB pagetables:2072kB unstable:0kB bounce:0kB writeback_tmp:0kB 
pages_scanned:99 all_unreclaimable? no
[770660.316233] lowmem_reserve[]: 0 0 0 0
[770660.316236] Node 0 DMA: 1*4kB 2*8kB 2*16kB 1*32kB 11*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 
1*512kB 0*1024kB 1*2048kB 0*4096kB = 3988kB
[770660.316247] Node 0 DMA32: 94*4kB 5*8kB 1*16kB 1*32kB 6*64kB 1*128kB 2*256kB 
0*512kB 0*1024kB 0*2048kB 0*4096kB = 1488kB
[770660.316257] 216001 total pagecache pages
[770660.316258] 0 pages in swap cache
[770660.316261] Swap cache stats: add 0, delete 0, find 0/0
[770660.316262] Free swap  = 0kB
[770660.316264] Total swap = 0kB
[770660.320351] 262139 pages RAM
[770660.320353] 6263 pages reserved
[770660.320355] 195097 pages shared
[770660.320356] 62534 pages non-shared
[770660.320455] kswapd0: page allocation failure. order:0, mode:0x20
[770660.320459] Pid: 36, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 2.6.32-25-server #44-Ubuntu
[770660.320462] Call Trace:
[770660.320465][] __alloc_pages_slowpath+0x56e/0x580
[770660.320476]  [] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x171/0x180
[770660.320481]  [] alloc_pages_current+0x87/0xd0
[770660.320485]  [] try_fill_recv+0x182/0x200
[770660.320489]  [] virtnet_poll+0x10d/0x160
[770660.320494]  [] net_rx_action+0x10f/0x250
[770660.320498]  [] __do_softirq+0xb7/0x1e0
[770660.320502]  [] ? handle_IRQ_event+0x60/0x170
[770660.320506]  [] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30
[770660.320509]  [] do_softirq+0x65/0xa0
[770660.320512]  [] irq_exit+0x85/0x90
[770660.320516]  [] do_IRQ+0x75/0xf0
[770660.320519]  [] ret_from_intr+0x0/0x11
[770660.320521][] ? __remove_mapping+0x88/0x110
[770660.320528]  [] ? shrink_page_list+0x2ad/0x6

[Bug 573778] Re: Option to send mail only in case of errors

2010-05-02 Thread Bernhard Seibold

** Patch added: "unattended.patch"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47294578/unattended.patch

-- 
Option to send mail only in case of errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 573778] [NEW] Option to send mail only in case of errors

2010-05-02 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: unattended-upgrades

It would be nice if you could tell unattended-upgrades to only send a
mail if things go wrong.

The attached patch does that by creating a new config option, defaulting
to not change current behaviour.

** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Option to send mail only in case of errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573778
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 454827] Re: linux-image-2.6.31-14-server and linux-image-2.6.31-14-virtual don't list a conflict with each other, but both provide vmlinuz-server on amd64

2010-03-16 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Any updates on this?

-- 
linux-image-2.6.31-14-server and linux-image-2.6.31-14-virtual don't list a 
conflict with each other, but both provide vmlinuz-server on amd64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/454827
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 481854] Re: pam_motd patch to show /etc/legal fails to set flag

2010-03-16 Thread Bernhard Seibold
It would be nice to do it the other way around: create a flag-file in
/etc/skel and delete it from the user's home after showing /etc/legal.

Or at least don't show the legalese if the directory containing the flag
can't be accessed at all.

-- 
pam_motd patch to show /etc/legal fails to set flag
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 484168] Re: aufs is missing in -virtual flavor

2010-03-16 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Still the case with 2.6.31-20-virtual.

-- 
aufs is missing in -virtual flavor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484168
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 538817] [NEW] wake-on-lan doesn't work on bridged interfaces

2010-03-14 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: bridge-utils

The if-post-down script of bridge-utils explicitly downs all interfaces on a 
bridge. As a result of this, wake-on-lan doesn't work anymore.
I'm not 100% sure, but I don't think it's really necessary to do "ifconfig $x 
down" on all bridge-slaves.

Tested on karmic with bridge-utils 1.4-5, but probably affects all
versions.

** Affects: bridge-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
wake-on-lan doesn't work on bridged interfaces
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538817
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 460781] Re: nfs-boot with unionfs doesn't work

2010-03-10 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Hello? Anyone still alive?

Could anyone please apply the provided fix? Oh right, I didn't use
apport. My bad.

-- 
nfs-boot with unionfs doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504407] Re: Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken

2010-01-12 Thread Bernhard Seibold
I did a little debugging. It isn't dhclient's fault after all, but
laptop-net, that ignores /etc/network/interfaces altogether. Sorry,
please close.

-- 
Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504407] Re: Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken

2010-01-12 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Meh.

1. the specific steps i took i already described
2. obviously i expect to have ONE default route with the metric i specified
3. also already described in the original bug report.

Not that it matters much, but here's some apport-stuff.

SourcePackage: dhcp3
Package: dhcp3-client 3.1.3-1ubuntu2
PackageArchitecture: amd64
Tags: lucid
ProblemType: Bug
ProcEnviron:
  LANGUAGE=C
  PATH=(custom, user)
  LANG=de_DE.utf8
  LC_MESSAGES=C
  SHELL=/bin/bash
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-10-generic x86_64
Dependencies:
  coreutils 7.4-2ubuntu1
  debconf 1.5.28ubuntu1
  debconf-i18n 1.5.28ubuntu1
  debianutils 3.2.2
  dhcp3-common 3.1.3-1ubuntu2
  dpkg 1.15.4.1ubuntu1
  findutils 4.4.2-1
  gcc-4.4-base 4.4.2-8ubuntu2
  libacl1 2.2.49-1
  libattr1 1:2.4.44-1
  libc-bin 2.11~20100104-0ubuntu2
  libc6 2.11~20100104-0ubuntu2
  libgcc1 1:4.4.2-8ubuntu2
  liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-6
  libselinux1 2.0.89-4
  libstdc++6 4.4.2-8ubuntu2
  libtext-charwidth-perl 0.04-6
  libtext-iconv-perl 1.7-2
  libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-7
  lzma 4.43-14ubuntu1
  perl-base 5.10.1-8ubuntu1
  sensible-utils 0.0.1ubuntu1
  tzdata 2009u-1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jan 13 02:13:31 2010
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-10.14-generic
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04

-- 
Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 504407] [NEW] Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken

2010-01-07 Thread Bernhard Seibold
Public bug reported:

I'm not sure if this bug is in dhcp3-client or ifupdown.

My /etc/network/interfaces looks like this:

iface eth0 inet dhcp
metric 10

When the interface is brought up automatically, the metric-line is
ignored, the default-route has metric 100.

But when issuing a manual ifdown,ifup, there are two default-routes, one
with metric 100, one with metric 10.

# ip route
# modprobe e1000e
# ip route
10.0.0.0/8 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.0.5.16 
default via 10.0.1.111 dev eth0  metric 100 
# (ifdown eth0 && ifup eth0) &>/dev/null
# ip route
10.0.0.0/8 dev eth0  proto kernel  scope link  src 10.0.5.16 
default via 10.0.1.111 dev eth0  metric 10 
default via 10.0.1.111 dev eth0  metric 100

** Affects: dhcp3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Option "metric" in /etc/network/interfaces broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504407
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 460781] Re: nfs-boot with unionfs doesn't work

2009-12-29 Thread Bernhard Seibold
** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: Ubuntu Development Team (ubuntu-dev) => Ubuntu Bugs (ubuntu-bugs)

-- 
nfs-boot with unionfs doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460781
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a bug assignee.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 498747] Re: Failed to build linux-image-2.6.33.rc1

2009-12-29 Thread Bernhard Seibold
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #561569
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561569

** Also affects: kernel-package (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=561569
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
Failed to build linux-image-2.6.33.rc1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/498747
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs