[Bug 1088533] Re: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup
Changing affected package from unity to compiz. - compiz (1:0.9.9~daily12.12.05-0ubuntu2) has this bug - compiz (1:0.9.9~daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1) has this bug - compiz (1:0.9.8.4+bzr3412-0ubuntu1) works as expected Probably a side effect to avoid windows behind the launcher at setup. The modes never and autohide must be considered. ** Package changed: unity (Ubuntu) = compiz (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533 Title: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1088533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088533] Re: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup
Downgrading unity/compiz to: - unity 6.12.0-0ubuntu4 - compiz 1:0.9.8.4+bzr3412-0ubuntu1 makes the window positioning work properly again. Thus,, this issue has been introduced in newer version of unity and/or compiz. Current versions causing this issue are: - unity 6.12.0daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 - compiz 1:0.9.9~daily12.12.05-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533 Title: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1088533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088533] Re: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup
** Description changed: - When lauching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its + When launching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its window location will depend om whether the launcher itself is visible or not at the time of setup. Test case: 1) configure launcher autohide mode 2) launch an application from the launcher - 3) keep the launcher visible during the application window setup + 3) move its window (align it) to the screen's left side + 4) close the window + 5) launch the same application again from the launcher, and + 6) keep the launcher visible during the application window setup Result: The application window is aligned to the launcher's top/righthand side, i.e where the window would have been setup using the never hide mode. Expected result The application window should be aligned to the screen's (icon workarea) top/lefthand side. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: unity 6.12.0daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.7.0-5.13-generic 3.7.0-rc8 Uname: Linux 3.7.0-5-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.7-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' Date: Mon Dec 10 17:01:24 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-21 (49 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533 Title: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1088533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088533] [NEW] Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup
Public bug reported: When lauching an application from the launcher (autohide mode) its window location will depend om whether the launcher itself is visible or not at the time of setup. Test case: 1) configure launcher autohide mode 2) launch an application from the launcher 3) keep the launcher visible during the application window setup Result: The application window is aligned to the launcher's top/righthand side, i.e where the window would have been setup using the never hide mode. Expected result The application window should be aligned to the screen's (icon workarea) top/lefthand side. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: unity 6.12.0daily12.12.05-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.7.0-5.13-generic 3.7.0-rc8 Uname: Linux 3.7.0-5-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.7-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' Date: Mon Dec 10 17:01:24 2012 InstallationDate: Installed on 2012-10-21 (49 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: unity UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533 Title: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1088533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1088533] Re: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup
** Tags added: regression-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1088533 Title: Launcher autohide mode - Application window location depends on whether the launcher is visible or not at setup To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1088533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1087486] Re: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1060484 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1060484 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1060484 When using gparted com.canonical.Unity.Devices blacklist is set back to Default of [] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087486 Title: CANNOT disable_Gparted places and locks EVERY partition to the launcher bar To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1087486/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1080389] Re: 3d session fails to initialize with nouveau on many GeForce cards
Thanks, your test kernel works great here so far ;) $ uname -a Linux ltop1 3.7.0-3-generic #9~lp1080389 SMP Wed Nov 21 17:07:50 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1080389 Title: 3d session fails to initialize with nouveau on many GeForce cards To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1080389/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1077376] Re: Evince crashes when using the latest version of libgeis1
Same issue here for opening pdf documents. Workaround: Downgrade libgeist1 version 2.2.13-0ubuntu1 to 2.2.12-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077376 Title: Evince crashes when using the latest version of libgeis1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1077376/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1054282] Re: No obvious way to restrict shopping suggestions from displaying adult products
It's not an argument to state that this cannot be fixed as it can: Alt 1: Remove concerned packages from the repos Alt 2: Fix proper filtering before introducing the feature Amazon et al should provide filtering options for this kind of stuff. Any filterings like an adult filter should be set on admin level. Such filters should be active by default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054282 Title: No obvious way to restrict shopping suggestions from displaying adult products To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-shopping/+bug/1054282/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1055755] Re: crashreporter crashed with SIGSEGV in get_fast_child_requisition()
This is a regression caused by the upgrade of overlay-scrollbar from 0.2.16+r353-0ubuntu2 to 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1 The source package overlay-scrollbar 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1 has now been deleted from the repos. Workaround for those that have version 0.2.16+r356-0ubuntu1 installed is: - downgrade overlay-scrollbar to ver 0.2.16+r353-0ubuntu2 (3 packages) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1055755 Title: crashreporter crashed with SIGSEGV in get_fast_child_requisition() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/1055755/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046791] Re: 'Open in terminal' from the nautilus right-click menu fails
Confirming this too. This ricotz glib2.0 source package solves the issue. glib2.0 2.33.13+git20120915.ac7dcd81-0ubuntu1~12.10~ricotz0 Confirmed by upgrading the following three packages: libglib2.0-0 libglib2.0-bin libglib2.0-dev -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791 Title: 'Open in terminal' from the nautilus right-click menu fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-open-terminal/+bug/1046791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046791] Re: 'Open in terminal' from the nautilus right-click menu fails
Not really, It's only related to nautilus-open-terminal. Using a nautilus script works Using nautilus actions is said to work -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791 Title: 'Open in terminal' from the nautilus right-click menu fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-open-terminal/+bug/1046791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044657] Re: [regression] Missing LO menus when not run in Unity
Partly solved by LO 3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu5. The menubar still is displayed in the unity panel when the globalmeny is disabled using UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0. Workaround for Unity with globalmeny disabled: - remove all appmenu packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044657 Title: [regression] Missing LO menus when not run in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1044657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
It seems you're running quantal with the wrong nouveau driver. The nouveau driver you're running is the xorg-edgers version for precise. So, switch to xorg-edgers for quantal and if that doesn't solve your problem then purge xorg-edgers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
Well, it might be relevant when running a mainstream precise version. In this case you should report this issue to the xorg crack pushers team as the ppa says: For questions and bugs with software in this PPA please contact xorg crack pushers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
Works with kernel 3.5.0-14 too so seems to have been fixed. ** Changed in: libdrm (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046791] [NEW] Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails
Public bug reported: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu causes it to crash. The terminal window opens just to immediately crash. No crash report generated. Open the gnome-terminal from the unity dash or via Alt-F2 works fine. This bug is present after the upgrade to - glib2.0 version 2.33.12-3 - glib-networking version 2.33.12-0ubuntu1 Downgrading those to - glib2.0 version 2.33.10-0ubuntu3 - glib-networking version 2.33.10-0ubuntu1 makes nautilus-open-terminal work again from the right-click menu. Same issue on two different quantal installs. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: nautilus-open-terminal 0.19-2build2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-13.14-generic 3.5.3 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-13-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.5.1-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 6 13:24:58 2012 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus-open-terminal UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus-open-terminal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791 Title: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-open-terminal/+bug/1046791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046791] Re: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791 Title: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-open-terminal/+bug/1046791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1046791] Re: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails
The upgrade concerned above is for the glib2.0 packages. Thus, nautilus-open-terminal need to be updated to the latest glib2.0. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1046791 Title: Open a gnome-terminal from the desktop right-click menu fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus-open-terminal/+bug/1046791/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
I made some further investigations for the nouveau driver today. Kernels 3.5.0-10 to 3.5.0-12: The issue is present with a corrupted screen and massive logging of PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR messages. Kernel 3.5.0-13 The issue seems gone, i.e the nouveau driver again! It seems that the fixes for kernel 3.5.0-13 (two bugs) also fixed this issue! My guess is the framebuffer recycling issue being fixed. The issue also is present in kernel 3.6, but never mind as 3.5 will be shipped for Quantal. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041354] Re: unity-panel-service uses ~100% CPU when libreoffice-gtk is installed and enabled
Just upgraded to libreoffice 1:3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu3 which seems ro have solved this load issue. However, LO does nolonger respect disabling of the globalmenu (UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0) and still draws the menubar in the unity panel. This in turn leaves other shells, e.g gnome classic, without an LO menubar, see bug #1044657. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041354 Title: unity-panel-service uses ~100% CPU when libreoffice-gtk is installed and enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1041354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1044657] Re: [regression] [quantal proposed] Missing LO menus when not run in Unity
Upgraded to libreoffice 1:3.6.1~rc2-1ubuntu3 which doesn't solve this issue. LibreOffice does not respect disabling of the globalmenu (UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0) but still draws the menubar in the Unity panel. This in turn (or other missing check) leaves other shells, e.g gnome classic, without an LO menubar, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044657 Title: [regression] [quantal proposed] Missing LO menus when not run in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1044657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
For the record this proprietary driver works just fine: nvidia-current 304.43-0ubuntu2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041040] Re: unity-lens-photos crashed with gi._glib.GError in function(): Error when getting information for file '/home/username/.shotwell/data/photo.db': No such file or directory
This bug is not fixed! If Shotwell has not been launched once then unity-lens-photo will still crash due to that the database /home/user/.local/share/shotwell/data/photo.db won't exist. Thus, a check whether the database exists or not is required as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041040 Title: unity-lens-photos crashed with gi._glib.GError in function(): Error when getting information for file '/home/username/.shotwell/data/photo.db': No such file or directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-photos/+bug/1041040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041354] Re: unity-panel-service since yesterday uses ~100% CPU, may be related to LibreOffice
Same here, the process unity-panel-service causes high CPU-load and I have experienced LO freezes too today. It has to do with LO but doesn't seem to be connected to the quickstarter (systray) as: libreoffice --quickstart=no still causes high CPU-load. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041354 Title: unity-panel-service since yesterday uses ~100% CPU, may be related to LibreOffice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1041354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041354] Re: unity-panel-service since yesterday uses ~100% CPU, may be related to LibreOffice
It seems to be a menubar issue. After dectivating globalmenu by removing the packages: appmenu-gtk, appmenu-qt, appmenu-gtk3, indicator-appmenu CPU-load is back to normal again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041354 Title: unity-panel-service since yesterday uses ~100% CPU, may be related to LibreOffice To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1041354/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
I'm attaching the kern.log when running the 3.5.0-11 kernel. ** Attachment added: kern.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+attachment/3271727/+files/kern.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
@dino99 vblank only works for some nvidia graphic cards (not mine) but worth testing as a workaround. I guess .udeb packages exist in the repos but not visible as those are special stripped ditto packages for special use to save ram. The kernel uses those instead of the more memory consuming .deb packages and I guess xorg does as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
Another workaround to avoid this drm issue is to remove the grub splash option. ** Description changed: Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for - login screen - desktop screen Prerequisities: - running the nouveau driver - - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels + - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to enter a corrupted desktop screen. At autologin a corrupted desktop screen is presented. The CPU-load is very high and caused by millions of loggings of messages like: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x so it seems to be related to DRM and the PFIFO cache. Workaround 1: Use an older kernel, e.g. 3.5.0-9 in my case. Workaround 2: Activate Ctrl-Alt-Backspace (as Alt-SysRq-K has been disabled) and use that shortcut to log out from the corrupted desktop screen. Then back to a normal login screen the login works as normal both for the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels and even for the 3.6.0 rc1 and rc2 kernels and normal CPU-load. + Workaround 3: + Remove the grub splash option. + Not sure it's the libdrm-nouveau2 package but remember that one was introduced for DRM in the time frame for this bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libdrm-nouveau2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-11.11-generic 3.5.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-11-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: - + ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,mousepoll,wall,place,snap,move,regex,imgpng,resize,widget,gnomecompat,session,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,workarounds,fade,expo,scale,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Mon Aug 20 18:40:48 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: - virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed - virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed - virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.6.0-030600rc2-generic, x86_64: installed - virtualbox-guest, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed + virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed + virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed + virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.6.0-030600rc2-generic, x86_64: installed + virtualbox-guest, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed EcryptfsInUse: Yes GraphicsCard: - NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) -Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] + NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) + Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 ProcEnviron: - TERM=xterm - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + TERM=xterm + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-11-generic root=UUID=d290b749-dff5-4155-936a-23e3effc21a8 ro quiet splash ipv6.disable=1 Renderer: Software SourcePackage: libdrm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8+bzr3249-0ubuntu4 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.99.904-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120713.6ef1ad6a-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.1-4~ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
** Description changed: Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for - login screen - desktop screen Prerequisities: - running the nouveau driver - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to enter a corrupted desktop screen. At autologin a corrupted desktop screen is presented. The CPU-load is very high and caused by millions of loggings of messages like: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x so it seems to be related to DRM and the PFIFO cache. Workaround 1: Use an older kernel, e.g. 3.5.0-9 in my case. Workaround 2: Activate Ctrl-Alt-Backspace (as Alt-SysRq-K has been disabled) and use that shortcut to log out from the corrupted desktop screen. Then back to a normal login screen the login works as normal both for the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels and even for the 3.6.0 rc1 and rc2 kernels and normal CPU-load. + + Instead of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace one can do the following: + - Press Ctrl-Alt-F2 + - login with your username and password + - Retart lightdm with: sudo service lightdm restart Workaround 3: Remove the grub splash option. Not sure it's the libdrm-nouveau2 package but remember that one was introduced for DRM in the time frame for this bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libdrm-nouveau2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-11.11-generic 3.5.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-11-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,mousepoll,wall,place,snap,move,regex,imgpng,resize,widget,gnomecompat,session,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,workarounds,fade,expo,scale,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Mon Aug 20 18:40:48 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.6.0-030600rc2-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox-guest, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed EcryptfsInUse: Yes GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-11-generic root=UUID=d290b749-dff5-4155-936a-23e3effc21a8 ro quiet splash ipv6.disable=1 Renderer: Software SourcePackage: libdrm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8+bzr3249-0ubuntu4 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.99.904-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120713.6ef1ad6a-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.1-4~ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
** Description changed: Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for - login screen - desktop screen Prerequisities: - running the nouveau driver - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to enter a corrupted desktop screen. At autologin a corrupted desktop screen is presented. The CPU-load is very high and caused by millions of loggings of messages like: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x so it seems to be related to DRM and the PFIFO cache. Workaround 1: Use an older kernel, e.g. 3.5.0-9 in my case. Workaround 2: Activate Ctrl-Alt-Backspace (as Alt-SysRq-K has been disabled) and use that shortcut to log out from the corrupted desktop screen. Then back to a normal login screen the login works as normal both for the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels and even for the 3.6.0 rc1 and rc2 kernels and normal CPU-load. Instead of Ctrl-Alt-Backspace one can do the following: - Press Ctrl-Alt-F2 - login with your username and password - - Retart lightdm with: sudo service lightdm restart + - Restart lightdm with: sudo service lightdm restart Workaround 3: Remove the grub splash option. Not sure it's the libdrm-nouveau2 package but remember that one was introduced for DRM in the time frame for this bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libdrm-nouveau2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-11.11-generic 3.5.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-11-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,mousepoll,wall,place,snap,move,regex,imgpng,resize,widget,gnomecompat,session,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,workarounds,fade,expo,scale,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Mon Aug 20 18:40:48 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.6.0-030600rc2-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox-guest, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed EcryptfsInUse: Yes GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-11-generic root=UUID=d290b749-dff5-4155-936a-23e3effc21a8 ro quiet splash ipv6.disable=1 Renderer: Software SourcePackage: libdrm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8+bzr3249-0ubuntu4 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.99.904-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120713.6ef1ad6a-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.1-4~ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
The following messages in the kern.log seem to cause this issue: Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421438] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: fail set_domain Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421444] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: validate vram_list Aug 22 00:25:01 ltop1 kernel: [ 32.421447] [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: validate: -22 present from kernel 3.5.0-10 and on and generated by ../drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] [NEW] [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
Public bug reported: Screen corruption occurs at start up and reboot, for - login screen - desktop screen Prerequisities: - running the nouveau driver - running the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels At non-autologin one can type the login password blindly but just to enter a corrupted desktop screen. At autologin a corrupted desktop screen is presented. The CPU-load is very high and caused by millions of loggings of messages like: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x so it seems to be related to DRM and the PFIFO cache. Workaround 1: Use an older kernel, e.g. 3.5.0-9 in my case. Workaround 2: Activate Ctrl-Alt-Backspace (as Alt-SysRq-K has been disabled) and use that shortcut to log out from the corrupted desktop screen. Then back to a normal login screen the login works as normal both for the 3.5.0-10 and -11 kernels and even for the 3.6.0 rc1 and rc2 kernels and normal CPU-load. Not sure it's the libdrm-nouveau2 package but remember that one was introduced for DRM in the time frame for this bug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: libdrm-nouveau2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-11.11-generic 3.5.2 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-11-generic x86_64 .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,mousepoll,wall,place,snap,move,regex,imgpng,resize,widget,gnomecompat,session,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,workarounds,fade,expo,scale,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz Date: Mon Aug 20 18:40:48 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox, 4.1.18, 3.6.0-030600rc2-generic, x86_64: installed virtualbox-guest, 4.1.18, 3.5.0-11-generic, x86_64: installed EcryptfsInUse: Yes GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-11-generic root=UUID=d290b749-dff5-4155-936a-23e3effc21a8 ro quiet splash ipv6.disable=1 Renderer: Software SourcePackage: libdrm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.8+bzr3249-0ubuntu4 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.38-0ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.4-1ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.12.99.904-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.99.99~git20120713.6ef1ad6a-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.20.3-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.1-4~ubuntu1 ** Affects: libdrm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 quantal running-unity ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1039125] Re: [drm] nouveau 0000:02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x00000000
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039125 Title: [drm] nouveau :02:00.0: PFIFO_CACHE_ERROR - Ch 2/2 Mthd 0x0800 Data 0x To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libdrm/+bug/1039125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Changed in: unity Assignee: (unassigned) = Bowmore (bowmore) ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Bowmore (bowmore) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1015497] Re: Cannot select gtk dropdown list value in multiple applications: ubiquity, landscape client
light-themes ver 0.1.11-0ubuntu1 seems to have solved this issue. Furthermore the high cpu-load (side effect?) for a running evolution is gone. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1015497 Title: Cannot select gtk dropdown list value in multiple applications: ubiquity, landscape client To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gtk/+bug/1015497/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Changed in: unity Assignee: Bowmore (bowmore) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Assignee: Bowmore (bowmore) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993506] Re: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build
Thanks for the link confirming it's an nvidia bug. Maybe it's doable to port the xorg-edgers nvidia patch to quantal. You're right about the headers and a more correct workaround would have been to copy system.h from a 3.2 kernel, Anyway this proposed workaround works too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993506 Title: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/993506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 993506] [NEW] nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build
Public bug reported: Installing the kernel 3.4.0-1.2 fails to build the nvidia-current module due to missing kernel header files. Workaround: Copy the missing header files from arm cd /usr/src/linux-headers-3.4.0-1/arch sudo cp arm/include/asm/system.h x86/include/asm/ sudo cp arm/include/asm/compiler.h x86/include/asm/ sudo cp arm/include/asm/system_info.h x86/include/asm/ sudo cp arm/include/asm/system_misc.h x86/include/asm/ and then reinstall the kernel. Those header files are missing from all but the arm arch. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-24.37-generic 3.2.14 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Är en katalog: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary: .proc.driver.nvidia.version: NVRM version: NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module 295.40 Thu Apr 5 21:37:00 PDT 2012 GCC version: gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) .tmp.unity.support.test.0: ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu7 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,composite,opengl,compiztoolbox,decor,vpswitch,snap,mousepoll,resize,place,move,wall,grid,regex,imgpng,session,gnomecompat,animation,fade,unitymtgrabhandles,workarounds,scale,expo,ezoom,unityshell] CompositorRunning: compiz CurrentDmesg: [ 30.885876] vboxdrv: fAsync=0 offMin=0x217 offMax=0x19a1 [ 30.885956] vboxdrv: TSC mode is 'synchronous', kernel timer mode is 'normal'. [ 30.885959] vboxdrv: Successfully loaded version 4.1.14 (interface 0x0019). [ 31.134421] vboxpci: IOMMU not found (not registered) [ 34.610424] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present DKMSKernelVersion: 3.4.0-1-generic Date: Wed May 2 21:45:18 2012 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: quantal DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: nvidia-current, 295.40, 3.2.0-23-generic, x86_64: installed nvidia-current, 295.40, 3.2.0-24-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.1.14, 3.2.0-24-generic, x86_64: installed vboxhost, 4.1.14, 3.4.0-1-generic, x86_64: installed GraphicsCard: NVIDIA Corporation GT216 [GeForce GT 330M] [10de:0a29] (rev a2) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device [144d:c06a] InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120421) JockeyStatus: xorg:nvidia_current - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (Proprietary, Enabled, In use) xorg:nvidia_current_updates - NVIDIA accelerated graphics driver (post-release updates) (Proprietary, Disabled, Not in use) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R580/R590 PackageVersion: 295.40-0ubuntu1 ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic root=UUID=d290b749-dff5-4155-936a-23e3effc21a8 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers Title: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 06/22/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: 11JB.M044.20100622.hkk dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345 dmi.board.name: R580/R590 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: Not Applicable dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: N/A dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr11JB.M044.20100622.hkk:bd06/22/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR580/R590:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR580/R590:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvrN/A: dmi.product.name: R580/R590 dmi.product.version: Not Applicable dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.7.8-0ubuntu1 version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.32-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 8.0.2-0ubuntu3 version.nvidia-graphics-drivers: nvidia-graphics-drivers N/A version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.1 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.0-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.99~git20111219.aacbd629-0ubuntu2 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.17.0-1ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20111201+b5534a1-1build2 ** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package compiz-0.9 has-workaround quantal regression reproducible ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993506 Title: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to:
[Bug 993506] Re: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/993506 Title: nvidia-current 295.40-0ubuntu1: nvidia-current kernel module failed to build To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/993506/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965577] Re: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position
It's also reproducable horizontally on a default install with default settings by bumping a window on the top of the screen (same workspace) back and forth. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965577 Title: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/965577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965577] Re: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position
Hmm, meant vertically above of course ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965577 Title: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/965577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965577] Re: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position
Sure, that makes it worse ;) But what I wanted to say is that it's not just an edge flipping issue. However, If I just disable snapping windows from the default compiz settings for unity I can't reproduce this issue! So the question is what plugin causes this? Tried to remove edge resistance for some plugins but that made no difference. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965577 Title: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/965577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 965577] Re: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position
Those settings have the s0_edgeflip_move = true and that's one thing that reveals this issue. But still the question is what causes this? I've revealed it without edge flipping too. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965577 Title: Window move between workspaces yields wron cursor position To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/965577/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Also affects: unity Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: unity Assignee: (unassigned) = Bowmore (bowmore) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 942939] Re: Menubar text not visible when Ambiance theme is used
** Summary changed: - The toolbar is not visible when the Ambiance theme enabled + Menubar text not visible when Ambiance theme is used ** Description changed: - The toolbar is not displayed when the Ambiance theme is enabled. + The menubar text is not displayed when the Ambiance theme is enabled. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: kompozer 1:0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic-pae 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic-pae i686 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: i386 Date: Tue Feb 28 23:40:12 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/kompozer/kompozer-bin InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha i386 (20120226) ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: kompozer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Changed in: kompozer (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/942939 Title: Menubar text not visible when Ambiance theme is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kompozer/+bug/942939/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Ok, I've tracked this down to Unity and found the root cause. Both the panel and the launcher window struts are wrongly initialized with the BaseWindow default geomentry (100,100,320,200) causing sporadic compression of desktop icons in the lower part of the screen. This is due to that the panel/launcher geometries for their BaseWindows have not been set when corresponding struts are enabled. Those geometries are availble in the code sequences so this patch just rearrange the order to see to that the geometry is set before struts is enabled. Attaching the patch icon_container_size.patch. ** Patch added: icon_container_size.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+attachment/3076721/+files/icon_container_size.patch ** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: unity (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Sorry, the patch is for unity 5.10.0-0ubuntu3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
It's probably easy but I'm not that familiar with bzr yet. Tried it a few months ago and remember the tricky thing was to create the patch, ie that part (not described) under Now start coding/Create before bzr commit. Then I was not authorized to commit to my branch, maybe forgot to login. So hopefully someone else will grab this patch this time until I know better ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Well, the patching was magic, checking with bzr status/diff ;-) Command bzr push ... said Created new branch but none appears on lp so I must have overseen something. Maybe reading the manual ;( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Branch linked: lp:~bowmore/unity/fix_icon_workarea_issues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Bowmore (bowmore) ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Thanks, those small annoying dots ... but now it's done ;-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
This issue seems to be a nux issue. I don't know what the Nux BaseWindow is for, but it's the one that interfers with EWMH struts and causes this issue. There are two functions: - BaseWindow::BaseWindow(...) - FloatingWindow::FloatingWindow(...) that both set the geometry using - SetGeometry(Geometry(100, 100, 320, 200)); when struts is enabled causing corruption of the struts. In this case the sum of the two y-coordinates 100+200=300 forms the top margin height for the strut and is sporadically detected by Nautilus using that value (300) to calculate the size of the workarea to be used to draw the desktop icons. That's why my earlier proposed workaround patch in Nautilus. Furthermore, the slower the computer is the more frequent this issue seems to be. I tested the geometry for the launcher to fit my screen resolution 1366x768, a panel heigth 24px and a launcher width incl padding of 17px, ie 32+17=49 by patching Nux BaseWindow.cpp: - SetGeometry(Geometry(0, 24, 49, 744)); and the issue (this bug) is gone. Conclusion: This functions (BaseWindow, FloatingWindow,..) should not be active at login or if so, in any case never address the root window for the screen but always be prefixed by a window pointer. Other concerns I have -- The handling of the EWMH struts is improper meaning it does not cover all four struts but only one of them at a given time, ie either the panel or the launcher strut. Thus being violated! http://standards.freedesktop.org/wm-spec/wm-spec-latest.html#id2578550 The Gnome session startup design rule is violated! http://live.gnome.org/SessionManagement/NewGnomeSession Here is says that the Desktop (phase 4 incl startup of Nautilus) must not be started until EWMH struts is complete. As both the WindowManager and Panel components for Unity is Compiz, Unity/Compiz has to handle that internally so the Desktop phase is not started up too early as happens now. A timer is not good enough, especially not for slow computers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Also affects: nux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
I've updated the patch as the upstream margin patch has been removed. I've also tested Gnome Classic Compiz and not detected any issues for the desktop icon workspace. At current, Unity settings of those margins is done in the Unity plugin which is to late, i.e those margins must be set one of the first things at session startup using XChangeProperty. If not known (no gsettings?) then those four margins can all be set to 0 and nautilus will adjust the workspace automatically when correct margins are set later. This will avoid issues like compressed workspace with overlapping icons etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Updated patch top_margin_workaround.patch for nautilus 3.3.92-0ubuntu2. Old patch removed. ** Patch added: top_margin_workaround.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+attachment/2940231/+files/top_margin_workaround.patch ** Patch removed: top margin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+attachment/2768289/+files/nautilus_top_margin.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
@Gaetano The source package is nautilus. You can either use the patch or update the source manually as it's just one line of code to be added in the source for nautilus-desktop-icon-view.c. Yes, you have to compile it using e.g $ debuild -us -uc to get .deb-packages Check this example if you're in doubt how to compile it: http://askubuntu.com/questions/21225/how-to-apply-a-patch-to-indicator-applet As an alternative you can use my ppa to get the patched version: $ sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:bowmore/pubtest $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install gir1.2-nautilus-3.0 libnautilus-extension1a nautilus nautilus-data and then remove the ppa with $ sudo add-apt-repository -r ppa:bowmore/pubtest This version also includes logged messages in syslog of any unreasonable top margin values and looks like this: Mar 26 11:18:42 dtop1 [DEBUG] nautilus-desktop-icon-view: icon_container_set_workarea: top margin ERROR, top = 300 meaning that the source module (file) nautilus-desktop-icon-view.c has a function icon_container_set_workarea () that detects any unreasonable top margin values, here equals 300 pixels. The patch then sets the top margin to 0. I've also moved the backward/forward arrows in the nautilus toolbar to the left of the location field making it easy to visualize that the patched version of nautilus is running. However, no guarantees that I will keep the ppa updated for newer versions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
Garthhh, there is no right or wrong here and working in an organized way neither means a one workspace approach nor to isolate spread functions to the current workspace. That is more a Canonical adaptation, that I support, to new users until now used (forced) to that way of working. Some as myself use more workspaces for a task (have done so for 20+ years now), other prefer one only (using stacked and minimized windows) for that purpose. I respect both ways of working. However, I'm sure there will be (bias) options for spreads covering all workspaces too, especially on an application level. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956509] Re: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted()
The reason why this issue didn't appear for 32-bit was that I hadn't deactivated the globalmenu the same way as for 64-bit. When I also deactivated it for 32-bit by setting UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 this issue appeared. Probably a dup of bug #953479 ** Description changed: This bug has been reported ealier but with no crash report but here's one attached. Problem: Opening an application, e.g firefox, causes the unity panel to crash. The panel however recovers just to crash again, aso. After a while it stabalizes but just with a few indicators left in the panel. I removed the package indicator-appmenu and the panel showed up correctly again. Workaround: Remove indicator-appmenu Other: - I have Precise running on both 32- and 64-bit machines but in my case the issue only appears for 64bit. - - I've also tried to downgrade libglib-2.0 to version 2.31.20-0ubuntu2 as - it is part in the trace but no luck. + I've also tried to downgrade libglib-2.0 to version 2.31.20-0ubuntu2 as it is part in the trace but no luck. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: unity-services 5.6.0-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CompizPlugins: [core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,regex,resize,compiztoolbox,imgpng,move,grid,mousepoll,place,vpswitch,gnomecompat,animation,wall,session,wobbly,workarounds,fade,expo,ezoom,scale,unityshell] CrashCounter: 1 Date: Thu Mar 15 23:04:49 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/unity/unity-panel-service InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/unity/unity-panel-service ProcEnviron: - SHELL=/bin/bash - LANGUAGE=sv:en - LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + LANGUAGE=sv:en + LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SegvAnalysis: - Segfault happened at: 0x7f737ace7b92:testb $0x4,0x20(%rdi) - PC (0x7f737ace7b92) ok - source $0x4 ok - destination 0x20(%rdi) (0x0020) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! + Segfault happened at: 0x7f737ace7b92:testb $0x4,0x20(%rdi) + PC (0x7f737ace7b92) ok + source $0x4 ok + destination 0x20(%rdi) (0x0020) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)! SegvReason: writing NULL VMA Signal: 11 SourcePackage: unity StacktraceTop: - ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 - g_variant_new_tuple () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 - ?? () - ?? () + ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 + g_variant_new_tuple () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0 + ?? () + ?? () Title: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_tuple() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fuse libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare sudo video -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956509 Title: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/956509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956509] Re: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_tuple()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956509 Title: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_new_tuple() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/956509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956509] Re: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted()
Another workaround: Downgrade indicator-appmenu to version 0.3.1-0ubuntu2 (oneiric version). Conclusion: There's a regression from version 0.3.1-0ubuntu2 to 2.31.20-0ubuntu1 ** Tags added: regression ** Tags removed: regression ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956509 Title: unity-panel-service crashed with SIGSEGV in g_variant_is_trusted() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/956509/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
This is not a duplicate of bug #737758. That bug describes how the whole desktop icon container moves horizontally due to an inconsistent handling of the unity launcher width. This bug brings up another issue, i.e when the desktop icon container width and/or height sizes are defined smaller than the correct sizes. Greater sizes however will work correctly as icon locations are pixeloriented. The specific issue here is that the desktop icon container height is defined smaller than the correct size which then causes vertical compression moving any icons located below the container (workarea) upwards. The bug is that X window properties are not properly initialized for the Unity session but inherits old X settings from XGetWindowProperty, here top.height=300, which indicates a panel height of 300 pixels thus reducing the icon container height accordingly causing compression and overlapping of desktop icons. So, undupping this one from #737758. ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 737758 Desktop icons move after login -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
By initialized properly I mean: The X window properties: top.height = bottom.height = left.width = right.width = 0 So here it's not a matter of when Unity/Compiz updates the top.height (panel) and the left.width (launcher). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) = compiz (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
Reassigning this bug to Compiz. Some tracing points to Compiz and more specifically a Compiz struts issue. Details: windows.cpp CompWindow::updateStruts () struts [0]=0, [1]=0, [2]=300, [3]=0, struts [4]=0, [5]=0, [6]=0, [7]=0 struts [8]=100, [9]=419, [10]=0, [11]=0 The setting of struts [2] = 300 (top.height) is the one that causes this issue, i.e indicates a panel of height 300 pixels that in combination with the real unity panel of 24 pixels later leaves 276 pixels of unused height at the bottom of the screen causing icons in that area to be moved upwards. Futhermore, struts [8]=100 (top.x) and struts [9]=419 (top.width) are inaccurate values e.g for a screen 1366x768 running unity. However, there's also a race conditions issue with nautilus causing this to appear sporadic. Sam, hope this is enough info for solving this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Tested that during the weekend but it didn't work then but for some magic reason now it mostly does :) you would have no other way for maximized app when you want to drop on the left part Not sure what you mean here but probably a strong reason to keep the behaviour. However, not happy with that autohide launcher behaviour: - makes it less intuitive with reversed triggering - makes it harder to rearrange icons in the leftmost column - causes distraction (annoyance) when rearranging icons But never mind, it's just my opinion ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938380] Re: Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel
The solution here is to add Unity to NotShowIn in the .desktop-file: /etc/xdg/autostart/nm-applet.desktop and probably also to: /usr/share/applications/nm-applet.desktop Not sure about app-install-data: /usr/share/app-install/desktop/network-manager-gnome:nm-applet.desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938380 Title: Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/938380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938380] Re: Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel
Sorry, just noticed that both network icons disappeared :( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938380 Title: Network-manager icon displayed twice in panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/938380/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Yes, that could be a workaround until we find out why reveived screen window margins sometimes have incorrect values. However, imo a final solution shall trust those margins and that those are the root cause of the problem. Margins here shall be controlled by Unity but I suspect that there are other players around too such as compiz that set/change those margins, mainly thinking of the left margin for the launcher. Then it's a question of how it should work. Just noticed, using launcher never hide mode, that desktop icons today really moves when changing the launcher width. Also checked in oneiric that acted the same way and there without any flickering, which thus has been introduced in precise. However, for launcher autohide mode the the desktop icons don't move, i.e appear static! An intentional behaviour? Another strange behaviour I noticed is that the leftmost desktop icons are moved below the launcher for the case setting the launcher width to 49! But the question remains, how shall it work? Is there any design decision made here? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
launcher is hidden by default and so we can have icon on the far left. Well, that would be great, but implies another launcher behavior when you drag an icon, right? As is today the hidden launcher always pops up when you drag an icon on the desktop which prevents you from using that leftmost part. So that means you instead have to trigger the launcher the usual way to throw an icon in the trash bin. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Just tested the moving icon scenario now and found two side-effects: Glitching What happens here is that the desktop icon workarea is updated three times! - first update with a correct value for left margin - second update with left margin = 0 !!! - third update with a correct value for left margin Expected: one update only The second and third updates cause the glitch as the icons here are moved to the left edge and then back again to its correct posisions. This is probably doable to fix as the unity session is active and by assuming that a left margin = 0 is always wrong. Other possible ways are to find the root cause why there are three updates instead of one and/or why the left margin = 0 in the second update. Icons moving out of screen - This one I guess is a showstopper for this scenario. Assume a launcher width equals 32 and with some desktop icons placed at the right edge of the screen. Increasing the launcher width to 64 here will partly move those icons away from the screen but still possible to grab and drag back into the screen. There is no mechanism implemented as I know of in nautilus atm to do a re-layout of the icons and even if there were one this could cause icons to overlap eachother on the right side. Thus, remains the static left margin = 64 that cause a white space between the launcher and icons on the left side. Looks buggy and wastes horizontal space but works. My conclusion is that there is no perfect (precise) solution to this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 932143] Re: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality
@Fitoschido: Nope ;) Consider the case when a user unlocks the home icon in the launcher. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932143 Title: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/932143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938784] Re: indicator-weather crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
** Description changed: - The indicator-weather crashes sporadically during a session - . + The indicator-weather crashes sporadically during a session. No problem however to restart it again. ProblemType: Crash DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: indicator-weather 11.11.28-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CrashCounter: 1 Date: Wed Feb 22 16:51:43 2012 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/indicator-weather InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7 PackageArchitecture: all ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/indicator-weather ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=sv:en - PATH=(custom, no user) - LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANGUAGE=sv:en + PATH=(custom, no user) + LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash Signal: 6 SourcePackage: indicator-weather StacktraceTop: - raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 - abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 - ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 - ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 - ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 + raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 + abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 + ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 + ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 + ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 Title: indicator-weather crashed with SIGABRT in raise() UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout dip fuse libvirtd lpadmin netdev plugdev sambashare sudo video ** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938784 Title: indicator-weather crashed with SIGABRT in __libc_message() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-weather/+bug/938784/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 932143] Re: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality
Why! What's wrong with multiple options to achieve something? Furthermore, the bookmark menu in the launcher's quicklist is premature., i.e not sorted the right way and this is known but not acted upon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/932143 Title: Update 'desktop' menu so it is fully relevant to desktop functionality To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/932143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938999] [NEW] Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
Public bug reported: The desktop icon container left margin differs dependent on whether the launcher is autohide or not. My interpretation is that the icon container's left margin shall be static, i.e the same, independent of the choice of the two launcher options, acc to a design decision. Also see bug #684649. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: nautilus 1:3.3.90-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Feb 22 21:57:53 2012 GsettingsChanges: org.gnome.nautilus.window-state geometry '1049x200+2+24' org.gnome.nautilus.window-state sidebar-width 202 org.gnome.nautilus.window-state start-with-status-bar true InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=sv:en TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=sv_SE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: nautilus UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938999] Re: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 938999] Re: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher
Here's a proposed patch for the package nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu2. ** Patch added: nautilus_left_margin.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+attachment/2772267/+files/nautilus_left_margin.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/938999 Title: Desktop icon container left margin issue for autohided launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/938999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
That bug does concider the fact that the desktop icon container shall be unchanged idependent of whether the kauncher is visible or not. That (design decision?) is stated in bug #684649. The the left margin might be decreased or adjusted but not too low as this causes side effect especially with the launcher popping up as soon as one drags an icon on the screen. Furthermore, the launcher's margin is registered i X and received from XGetWindowProperty. For a 32 pix wide launcher the left margin received is 49 pixels and for a hidden launcher it's 0 pixels. Tthis is why adding 66-15=51 to that left margin causes this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 936958] Re: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher
Another better solution is to always register the left margin (launcher width + any pad) to X independent of whether the launcher is visible or not and remove the adjustment left += UNITY_LAUNCHER_WIDTH - 15. The pros is that there is no visible empty column between a visible launcher and the left most icons. The cons is that desktop icons will move when you change the launcher width. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/936958 Title: Nautilus is now placing desktop icons far away from the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/936958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
The issue causing desktop icons at the bottom of the screen to be moved upwards and in some cases (sporadically) overlap other icons is caused by multiple setups of the desktop icon container in combination with a first too high top margin value setting the height of the desktop icon container. Futhermore, if a desktop icon container has been drawn it will not be redrawn with new margin values, see module libnautilus- private/nautilus-icon-container.c/redo_layout_internal. In my case this issue occurs when a top margin value of 300 pixels appears (from Xlib XGetWindowProperty) and then is used to finally set the desktop icon container height. As the Unity panel is 24 pixels the the empty part in the lower part of the screen will be 300-24 = 276 pixels. So any icons in that lower empty area will then be moved upwards into the desktop icon container. As the function redo_layout_internal today does not support redrawal of the desktop icon container one way is to filter bad margin values. As it only seems to be caused by a too high top margin value this can be done in the module src/nautilus-desktop-icon- view.c/icon_container_set_workarea. The highest value to be passed is set to 49 in the following patch but can be reduced further down to max of panel height (top margin) for any sessions supported by ubuntu. Furthermore, it might be included into the patch 02_additional_marge_for_unity.patch. ** Patch added: top margin patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+attachment/2768289/+files/nautilus_top_margin.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886667] Re: boot moves desktop icons
For clarity, the patch top margin patch is for the precise package nautilus_3.3.90-0ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886667 Title: boot moves desktop icons To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/886667/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 833397] Re: indicator power displayed twice on panel
Confirmed, gnome battery applet back again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833397 Title: indicator power displayed twice on panel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-2d/+bug/833397/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 933615] Re: menu shadows not clearing when menus close
Yes, compiz 1:0.9.7.0~bzr2995-0ubuntu3 seems to have fixed it. No more ghost menus ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933615 Title: menu shadows not clearing when menus close To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/933615/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912031] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable
@Colin: It's hard to file a new bug as when I try to all it does is to refer to this bug. Mine crashed today after selecting manual partitioning. I have 20+ partitions on sda (from pre-lucid times) if that mignt be an issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912031 Title: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
IIRC, we do plan to support a view showing all the windows of an app across all workspaces, but I don't think this is implemented to spec yet. This would be great ;) One more question: Does this new approach. basic views etc limited to the current workspace, include e.g launching of applications via the launcher? That is, even if there exists one or even more windows for this application in other workspaces a new window will be opened in the current workspace? For consistency with this new approach I think this should be the case and what your users expect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
Agree upon that this really is a poor decision. Linux is a multi-workspace operating system and this has to be considered on designing features. Assume the following as one of examples: - the user has set up a number of workspaces - a nautilus window exists on two or more workspaces This design decision then makes it very hard to find those nautilus windows located on other workspaces without having to: - manually browse through all workspaces - click the launcher folder button each time (window could be hidden) Not really a user friendly way of working. There are ways to solve this deficiency, e.g: - make it configurable - combine it with a key - revert this decision So what I'm trying to state here is that features like this one must consider the fact that Linux is a multi-workspace operating system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 689733] Re: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread
@Mark: I'm sorry to have to disagree with you in this matter. The following makes sense - spread för all applications windows in current workspace (alt-tab) - spread for a specific application's windows incl all workspaces However, this does not make much sense - spread for a specific application's windows in current workspace (now leftclick) Hereby I leave this discussion in hope that this will be reconcidered. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/689733 Title: Application icons should only display windows from the current workspace in the window spread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/689733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922678] [NEW] System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
Public bug reported: System Settings Appearance only lists the themes Adwaita, Ambiance, Radiance, HighContrast and HighContrastInverse. This while Advanced Settings (Gnome Tweak Tool) also lists Greybird and Raleigh plus any Gtk+ themes in the user's ~/.themes. There may be an intentional drop of the themes Greybird and Raleigh though but at least themes in the user's ~/.themes should be made selectable in the list. $ apt-cache policy gnome-control-center gnome-control-center: Installed: 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 Candidate: 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 Version table: *** 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: gnome-control-center 1:3.2.2-2ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-11.19-generic 3.2.1 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-11-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Jan 27 17:11:58 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: gnome-control-center UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) usr_lib_gnome-control-center: deja-dup 21.2-0ubuntu4 gnome-bluetooth3.2.1-1ubuntu4 indicator-datetime 0.3.1-0ubuntu5 ** Affects: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922678] Re: System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 922678] Re: System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes
Respecting design decisions in general I however think this is an odd one. I guess this implicitly means that the same restrictive approach will apply to icons, fonts, etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/922678 Title: System Settings Appearance theme list lacks existing themes To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/922678/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 918916] Re: Icon to choose DE becomes visible only if I select another user entry than the default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 918657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918657 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 918657 unity-greeter_0.2.0-0ubuntu2 breaks desktop-selector -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918916 Title: Icon to choose DE becomes visible only if I select another user entry than the default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/918916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 918916] Re: Icon to choose DE becomes visible only if I select another user entry than the default
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 918657 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918657 Marking this a duplicate of bug #918657 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/918916 Title: Icon to choose DE becomes visible only if I select another user entry than the default To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/918916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
I would rather prefer that shortcuts in the quicklist open new tabs than new windows. That was also what I expected the first time I tested this new Home quicklist. Myself I use a number of customized quicklists and one example here is firefox. There I use firefox -new-tab url to achieve that and the firefox window is always focused. That's to me an expected behaviour not new windows each time crowding the desktop. However, I was going to test that case for nautilus but can't find a command option for setting up a new nautilus tab. Maybe that's why this behaviour was not implemented? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
We can maybe link to that, but we have to take into account the case where there is no nautilus window opened, raise to focus this one, move your current workspaces and such. All that work for e.g. firefox even when there is no current firefox window but I guess nautilus is not designed to support this behaviour fully and easily as one have to patch nautilus to implement the quicklist. I would though gladly accept a patch doing it :) I would gladly help if I had the skills ;) Hope that someone having that and time will look into this. Thanks anyway. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
A comment to this fix: It's not a good idea to alphabetically sort folders and bookmarks as one group of objects. The quicklist should group Computer folders and Bookmarks separatelly and preferably in that order. Confer the presentation in Nautlius sidebar. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
Ok, I see. Anyhow, one approach could be to use the output from command ls below cd ~ ls -d */ which lists ALL not hidden user top folders. Another approach is to extract the default top folders from the file ~/.config/user-dirs.dirs and adding the home folder. From that those top folders can be removed from the bookmark list in the quicklist. The second approach is more in line with Nautilus computer folder list content. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 723862] Re: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu.
I prefixed the bookmarks from the top folders with | without quotes as a wotkaround. This will list top folder (Desktop, Documents, Downloads, Music etc) first and remaining bookmarks last in the quicklist. I think this is the preferred way as top folder are few (at least if only default folders are listed) and bookmarks can be numerous. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/723862 Title: Nautilus quicklist does not contain the locations previously found under the 'Places' menu. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/723862/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 910936] Re: Folder and File of same name cannot coexist in a directory
Creating a folder and a file with the same name in a folder is not allowed. The reason is that a folder is a special type of a file, i.e it's a file including the file mode bit d. Also see e.g http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_file_types Thus, this does not work touch ~/Downloads/test mkdir ~/Downloads/test an nor does this mkdir ~/Downloads/test cat ~/Downloads/test Ctrl+D Marking the bug invalid. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/910936 Title: Folder and File of same name cannot coexist in a directory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/910936/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 915600] Re: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission
Confirmed, this issue still not solved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/915600 Title: Changing brightness request root (super user) permission To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/915600/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
