[Bug 1946161] Re: Add GTK4 support

2022-01-15 Thread Brett Bogert
Folks,

 Please just ignore for now. We need a recipe done and have not
 heard back from the package maintainer.

 I am going to give debs to Ubuntu Unity so they can put them
 in their PPA and get the fix to the users and will deal with
 getting the recipe done when we figure out what has happened
 to the maintainer.

 I will uncheck the patch box and will try to submit to the
 open stream when we get the recipe issue solved(need to go
 to GitHub from where we got it).

 Sorry for the confusion(I'm a noob).

Brett "WolfMan" Bogert

** Tags removed: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946161

Title:
  Add GTK4 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk3-nocsd/+bug/1946161/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946161] Re: Add GTK4 support

2022-01-13 Thread Brett Bogert
This fix adds nocsd support for GTK4 as well as fixes an
logic error in gtk_window_set_titlebar in the original
code taken from https://github.com/ZaWertun/gtk3-nocsd.

Attaching debdiff for version 4.1ubuntu2.

This has been tested on Ubuntu Unity 21.10 with new version
4-1ubuntu1 installed as well as WolfLand 22.04 Unity with
version 3-1ubuntu1 installed.

gtk3-nocsd testing worked as designed.

** Patch added: "Add GTK4 support for gtk3-nocsd"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk3-nocsd/+bug/1946161/+attachment/5554177/+files/gtk3-nocsd-4-1ubuntu2.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946161

Title:
  Add GTK4 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk3-nocsd/+bug/1946161/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946794] Re: unity-tweak-tool: GLib-GIO-ERROR

2021-12-04 Thread Brett Bogert
Sebastien,

 Got the changes done and tested but could not get the patch header via
 quilt to work so we are sans patch header. Clearly the other patch 
 writers have another way to get a header into the patch so if we can
 find out how they are doing it I will be glad to add it and redo the
 debdiff.

 Built using pbuilder and debuild. Installed via gdebi. Tested all 3
 selections of antialiasing as well as all 4 selections of hinting as
 well as other items that I needed to change. Works as intended and I
 will attach the debdiff to the bug report.

 Let me know what I need to do next.


** Patch added: "more new font schemas changes"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946794/+attachment/5545401/+files/unity-tweak-tool_0.0.7+-0ubuntu10.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946794

Title:
  unity-tweak-tool:  GLib-GIO-ERROR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946794/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1946794] Re: unity-tweak-tool: GLib-GIO-ERROR

2021-10-13 Thread Brett Bogert
Sebastian,

     Not a problem. I will look into it and see if I can get 
the needed changes tested and
     try to get a debdiff for you.

Thanks for your help,
Brett "WolfMan" Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

On 10/13/21 2:57 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Hey, so I've been uploading patches suggested by contributors over a few
> revision but I don't have time to do the testing. It seems like those
> iteration didn't really work out though I'm going to step out of
> uploading fixes until someone comes with a proper debdiff tested in
> which case I'm happy to help with the sponsoring
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946794

Title:
  unity-tweak-tool:  GLib-GIO-ERROR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946794/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946794] [NEW] unity-tweak-tool: GLib-GIO-ERROR

2021-10-12 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

unity-tweak-tool_0.0.7+-0ubuntu9 is giving an GLib-GIO-ERROR:

(unity-tweak-tool:8927): GLib-GIO-ERROR **: 15:26:30.421: Settings schema 
'org.gnome.desktop.interface' does not contain a key named 'antialiasing'
Trace/breakpoint trap (core dumped)

This is probably coming from 
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/UnityTweakTool/section/spaghetti/theme.py which 
is still referencing "antialiasing" and "hinting" instead of "font-aliasing"
and "font-hinting" as in the new schema in desktop.interface:

diff theme.py theme.py.fixed 
166c166
< if gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('antialiasing') == 'none':
---
> if gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-antialiasing') == 'none':
168c168
< elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('antialiasing') == 'grayscale':
---
> elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-antialiasing') == 
> 'grayscale':
170c170
< elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('antialiasing') == 'rgba':
---
> elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-antialiasing') == 'rgba':
174c174
< if gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('hinting') == 'none':
---
> if gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-hinting') == 'none':
176c176
< elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('hinting') == 'slight':
---
> elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-hinting') == 'slight':
178c178
< elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('hinting') == 'medium':
---
> elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-hinting') == 'medium':
180c180
< elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('hinting') == 'full':
---
> elif gsettings.antialiasing.get_string('font-hinting') == 'full':

Sorry for the late bug report but got tied up working on gtk3-nocsd for
GTK4.

If you don't have a Unity desktop to test on and want to test your changes
before commit I have a 21.10 machine setup with Unity for testing purposes
and will be glad to test it for you if needed.

Thanks,
Brett "WolfMan" Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

** Affects: unity-tweak-tool (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946794

Title:
  unity-tweak-tool:  GLib-GIO-ERROR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946794/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946477] Re: package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-10-08 Thread Brett Bogert
Now that I have some time to look at the problem it seems that the post-install
is failing with the following error:

  File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/UnityTweakTool/section/spaghetti/gsettings.py", 
line 109
antialiasing = gnome('desktop.interface’)
 ^
SyntaxError: EOL while scanning string literal

If you edit the gsettings.py file with gedit you can see that the end 
parentheses is showing
in pink instead of white.

Don't know if this is a problem with the patch file but somehow we are picking 
up an EOL
character which is causing the closing parenthesis to be shown as pink instead 
of
white(maybe interpreted as an EOL signal or something like that).

As far as I can tell the coding changes seem to be correct for the moving of 
the schema
from "xsettings" to "desktop.interface" but I am a noob so what the hell do I 
know.

If I can gather more information or anything let me know.

Brett "WolfMan" Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946477

Title:
  package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946477] Re: package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-10-08 Thread Brett Bogert
I think the title pretty much says it all

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946477

Title:
  package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946477] [NEW] package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2021-10-08 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

The title pretty much says it all.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5json:
 {
   "result": "skip"
 }
Date: Fri Oct  8 08:21:22 2021
ErrorMessage: installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 1
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-10-04 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: WolfLand 21.10 Unity v1.8b - Release amd64
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.9, Python 3.9.7, python3-minimal, 3.9.4-1build1
PythonDetails: N/A
SourcePackage: unity-tweak-tool
Title: package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: 
installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: unity-tweak-tool (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package impish third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946477

Title:
  package unity-tweak-tool 0.0.7+-0ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:
  installed unity-tweak-tool package post-installation script subprocess
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-tweak-tool/+bug/1946477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946161] [NEW] Add GTK4 support

2021-10-05 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

Add GTK4 support from: https://github.com/ZaWertun/gtk3-nocsd.

This fixes issues with the removal of the Client Side Decorations in GTK4 as 
well as
some window decoration issues.

** Affects: gtk3-nocsd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Brett Bogert (bbogert24)
 Status: New

** Changed in: gtk3-nocsd (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Brett Bogert (bbogert24)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946161

Title:
  Add GTK4 support

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk3-nocsd/+bug/1946161/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1871963] Re: dpkg fails to install grub-efi-amd64 signed and shim-signed

2020-04-11 Thread Brett Bogert
Rob,

   Your problem is due to another process having the 
/var/cache/debconf.dat
   file in a locked state:

 debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked
by another process: Resource temporarily unavailable

   The original problem reported was due to a syntax error in the 
code which is now fixed.

   I have never seen this particular problem before so haven't a 
clue how to fix it.

   Normally if you have a file locked during an apt command it is 
due to another apt
   process locking it. This could be due to an automated check for 
update(e.g. apt update)
   command running when you are trying to do a manual command or 
from one of the
   package managers being left open when you are trying to do a 
manual command.

   Hope this helps,

Brett "WolfMan" Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com


On 4/10/20 7:42 PM, Rob Frohne wrote:
> For me there as no semicolon, but I still get the error.
>
> rohro@frohro-260:~/Projects/IQ_SDR/Receiver$ sudo vi 
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-efi-amd64-signed.postinst
> frohro@frohro-260:~/Projects/IQ_SDR/Receiver$ sudo apt upgrade -f
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Calculating upgrade... Done
> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer 
> required:
>clang-tidy-9 clang-tools-9 gnome-software-common libberkeleydb-perl 
> libcgi-fast-perl libcgi-pm-perl libclang1-9
>libclass-accessor-perl libfcgi-perl libfdk-aac1 libffi6 libmypaint-1.3-0 
> libobjc-8-dev libpoppler95
>libpython3.7 libpython3.7-minimal libpython3.7-stdlib 
> libwxgtk-webview3.0-gtk3-0v5 node-node-uuid
> Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove them.
> 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 1 not fully installed or removed.
> After this operation, 0 B of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n]
> debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by 
> another process: Resource temporarily unavailable
> Setting up grub-efi-amd64-signed (1.140+2.04-1ubuntu24) ...
> debconf: DbDriver "config": /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by 
> another process: Resource temporarily unavai
> lable
> dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure):
>   installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess 
> returned error exit status 1
> Errors were encountered while processing:
>   grub-efi-amd64-signed
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> frohro@frohro-260:~/Projects/IQ_SDR/Receiver$
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871963

Title:
  dpkg fails to install grub-efi-amd64 signed and shim-signed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1871963/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871989] [NEW] dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure):

2020-04-09 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

Upon updates on 20200409 I encountered the following error:

Setting up grub-efi-amd64-signed (1.139+2.04-1ubuntu24) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/grub-efi-amd64-signed.postinst: 23: Syntax error: word unexpe
cted (expecting ")")
dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure):
 installed grub-efi-amd64-signed package post-installation script subprocess ret
urned error exit status 2

The problem is being caused by a syntax error in grub-efi-amd64-signed.postint
at line 23.

Problematic code:

case $1 in
configure)
target=x86_64-efi ;;
# Check /boot/grub to see if we previously installed to an ESP. We don't
# want to trigger the install code just by installing the package,
# normally the installer installs grub itself first.
if test -e /boot/grub/$target/core.efi; then
/usr/share/grub/grub-check-signatures
/usr/lib/grub/grub-multi-install --target=$target
fi

;;
esac

Corrected code:

case $1 in
configure)
target=x86_64-efi
# Check /boot/grub to see if we previously installed to an ESP. We don't
# want to trigger the install code just by installing the package,
# normally the installer installs grub itself first.
if test -e /boot/grub/$target/core.efi; then
/usr/share/grub/grub-check-signatures
/usr/lib/grub/grub-multi-install --target=$target
fi

;;
esac

Problem was found and fixed using shellcheck and geany IDE.

I changed the code re-ran the upgrade command verified the
boot partition via the dialog and rebooted and it worked
fine.

Thanks,
Brett "WolfMan" Bogert

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871989

Title:
  dpkg: error processing package grub-efi-amd64-signed (--configure):

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1871989/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1845730] Re: ubiquity crashed with FileNotFoundError in _execute_child(): [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/sbin/udevadm': '/sbin/udevadm'

2019-09-30 Thread Brett Bogert
Rik,

   Makes sense as I did all of my initial testing on a machine that is
   connected via ethernet but my daily driver is connected via wireless.

   This would explain why I did not catch this before the beta.


On 9/30/19 2:31 AM, Rik Mills wrote:
> Probably obvious, but I'll say for the record. I see this on a laptop
> with failure to load try/install screen, and launch from live session,
> where the laptop has only wireless to configure. Not seen on a Vbox VM
> with its emulated ethernet connection there.
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845730

Title:
  ubiquity crashed with FileNotFoundError in _execute_child(): [Errno 2]
  No such file or directory: '/sbin/udevadm': '/sbin/udevadm'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1845730/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1409032] Re: gvfsd-smb: very high CPU utilisation

2016-06-04 Thread Brett Bogert
After not be satisfied with any of the above workarounds to the problem
I decided to take a look at the problem and see if I could come up with
a "cleaner" workaround or fix.

I found that this problem occurs in Ubuntu 16.04 with Unity Gnome 3.18
GnomeShell Gnome 3.20, Budgie Gnome 3.18 and Fedora 24 Beta.

After some troubleshooting I found the following solution that does
not require changing executable permissions or removing packages:

1- Make a backup copy of the smb.conf file in /etc/samba.

2- Edit the /etc/samba/smb.conf file using your favorite editor
and add the following line under the "[global]" statement:

name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast

The file should look like this:

[global]
name resolve order = wins lmhosts bcast

3- Save the file and reboot.

The problem should be fixed and you should notice that the
"Network" Icon and label shows up much quicker in your
file browser than before and the 100% CPU usage is gone.

Hope this helps.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409032

Title:
  gvfsd-smb: very high CPU utilisation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1409032/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1409032] Re: gvfsd-smb: very high CPU utilisation

2016-05-27 Thread Brett Bogert
I am also having this problem on multiple machines. Every time I hear the
fans running on high (except when I am remastering) its due to this bug.

I am running 16.04 64bit with Unity desktop.

Just wanted to add myself to the list of those seeing the problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409032

Title:
  gvfsd-smb: very high CPU utilisation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1409032/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

2016-05-19 Thread Brett Bogert
Folks, Updates had been working fine for me until today (5/19/2016).

I updated my machines last night(all 11 of them) and now all are
experiencing the aforementioned problem with 100% CPU usage from
appstreamcli.

It appears that in my case at least that something applied last
night must be triggering the problem as I have had no problems
with apt update until today.

I was able to "Ctrl C" out of the update command and install 
some updates but have to "assume" that I had gotten them all
since the update command never completed.

I will try and get the above fix applied to at least some of my
machines tomorrow.

How will users be able to apply the fix if they can't get past
the apt update command hanging (other than manual intervention
that is)?

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712

Title:
  Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1521132] Re: Failed to install Xenial in UEFI mode, failed with "grub-efi-amd64-signed package failed to install into /target/"

2016-03-29 Thread Brett Bogert
I am also seeing this with the beta2 image.

Non-UEFI installs work fine but any attempt to install with UEFI fails
with the reported error:

The 'grub-efi-amd64-signed' package failed to install into /target/.
Without GRUB boot loader, the installed system will not boot.

I have tried installing to a completely naked SSD (e.g. no partitons created 
before install)
and was connected to the internet during the install so EFI partition 
corruption and not 
being connected to the internet don't seem to be the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1521132

Title:
  Failed to install Xenial in UEFI mode, failed with "grub-efi-
  amd64-signed package failed to install into /target/"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/grub-installer/+bug/1521132/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1506587] Re: Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

2015-10-20 Thread Brett Bogert
Sebastien,

I installed the Ultimate-White24 cursor theme into the /usr/share/icons/
directory.

I then used "sudo update-alternatives --install" command to add the cursor 
theme 
into the alternatives.

I then used "sudo update-alternatives --config x-cursor-theme" to update the
cursor theme to be the system wide cursor.

Lastly I used Unity-Tweak-Tool to select the "Ultimate-White24" cursor for the
Unity desktop.

The cursor theme was working fine until the above mentioned updates were
installed and the problem appeared.

I agree that the update to unity-settings-daemon is the most likely
suspect.

I only updated my "daily driver" machine with the updates and kept my
"build server" back from being updated until last night. The build server
was correctly displaying the cursor theme in all cases until I updated it
last night and now it shows the problem as well.

Thanks,
Brett

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506587

Title:
  Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1506587/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1506587] Re: Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

2015-10-20 Thread Brett Bogert
Sebastien,

After looking at the code involved as well as information on how to set up
the Xserver  for the cursor size/name  I found the following workaround:

Add the following to the "/etc/X11/Xresources/x11-common" file:

Xcursor.size: 24
Xcursor.theme: Ultimate-White24

Of course this is what the newly added code is supposed to be doing so
I am just manually informing the Xserver of the same information.

Thanks,
Brett

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506587

Title:
  Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1506587/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1506587] Re: Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

2015-10-19 Thread Brett Bogert
Sebastien,

Here is the output of the gsettings command:

~$ gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.interface cursor-theme 'Ultimate-
White24'

I checked that this was set correctly before I opened the bug report.

Thanks,
Brett


On 10/19/2015 11:50 AM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> gsettings get org.gnome.desktop.interface cursor-theme

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506587

Title:
  Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-settings-daemon/+bug/1506587/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1506587] [NEW] Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

2015-10-15 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

After update on 20151015 at 9:54 EST Unity desktop no longer respects
cursor theme.

Ubuntu release is Wily (e.g. 15.10) beta.

Update contained the following packages:

Oct 15 09:54 hud_14.10+15.10.20151012-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
Oct 15 09:54 libhud2_14.10+15.10.20151012-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
Oct 15 09:54 libunity-settings-daemon1_15.04.1+15.10.20151012-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
Oct 15 09:54 unity-settings-daemon_15.04.1+15.10.20151012-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb

Instead of the correct cursor theme "Ultimate-white24" the default white cursor 
theme is
displayed on the desktop and most GTK3 applications.

Some applications such as Firefox still show the correct "Ultimate-white24" 
cursor as long
as the cursor stays in the application but changes to the default white cursor 
if the cursor
moves to the window decoration or desktop.

Unity Tweak and dconf-editor show that the cursor theme is set to 
"Ultimate-white24" and
the alternatives (e.g. update-alternatives --config x-cursor-theme) also show 
the cursor
theme to be "Ultimate-white24".

At the Unity Greeter (e.g. Lightdm) the cursor theme is correct but it changes 
to the default
white cursor as soon as the login is started.

Let me know if I can provide any more information, screenshots etc.

Thanks

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.10
Package: unity 7.3.2+15.10.20151002.2-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-16.19-generic 4.2.3
Uname: Linux 4.2.0-16-generic x86_64
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.19.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
BootLog:
 Scanning for Btrfs filesystems
 fsck from util-linux 2.26.2
 /dev/sda2: clean, 418973/13582336 files, 9730415/54308096 blocks
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: compiz
CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Thu Oct 15 13:52:02 2015
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: wily
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus: virtualbox, 5.0.4, 4.2.0-16-generic, x86_64: installed
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Turks XT [Radeon HD 6670/7670] 
[1002:6758] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: XFX Pine Group Inc. Device [1682:3180]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-09-29 (16 days ago)
InstallationMedia: WolfLand-15.10-Elite-v1.1b2 15.10 - Release amd64
MachineType: To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M.
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.2.0-16-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=9d364344-d083-4d67-a7da-9e19332b6f35 ro quiet splash
SourcePackage: unity
UdevLog: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/var/log/udev'
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 01/06/2014
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 2301
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2301:bd01/06/2014:svnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnSABERTOOTH990FX/GEN3R2.0:rvrRev1.xx:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To be filled by O.E.M.
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.12.2+15.10.20151002-0ubuntu1
version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.64-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 11.0.2-1ubuntu4
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 11.0.2-1ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.17.2-1ubuntu9
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.9.2-1ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 
1:7.5.0+git20150819-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20150808-0ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.11-1ubuntu3
xserver.bootTime: Thu Oct 15 13:22:25 2015
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.errors:
 
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.version: 2:1.17.2-1ubuntu9
xserver.video_driver: radeon

** Affects: unity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug compiz-0.9 ubuntu wily

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1506587

Title:
  Unity Desktop does not respect cursor theme after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1506587/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1439860] Re: Gnome Flashback Metacity: Artifacts on all metacity windows

2015-04-04 Thread Brett Bogert
A bit more info. I found that enabling the use dark variant in the terminal 
options make the
problem disappear for the terminal.

I then used Tweak Tool to enable the Global Dark option and the
problem disappears altogether.

I then disabled Global Dark option from the Tweak Tool and chose the 
Vertex-Dark theme
and the problem re-appears.

So in short enabling Global Dark in the Tweak Tool makes the problem 
disappear in all
windows and enabling use dark variant in the terminal options makes the 
problem 
disappear for the terminal window only.

Hope this helps narrow things down a bit.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439860

Title:
  Gnome Flashback Metacity: Artifacts on all metacity windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1439860/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1439871] [NEW] Gnome Flashback Metacity: Gradient/Box Shadow on Panels gives incorrect black background

2015-04-02 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

In Gnome Flashback Metacity Vivid 15.04 Gradient/Box Shadow gives
incorrect black background.

Theme used is Vertex pr Vertex-Dark for Gtk3.14. Panel background should
be gray in color not black.

Problem is related to using Gradient/Box Shadow in the theme code for
the panels.

I am opening this bug report at the theme designers request as he states that 
is does not work as
it should and he cannot style it properly.

I will attach 2 screenshots of the problem. Note the black background on
the panels where they should be gray.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-11.11-generic 3.19.3
Uname: Linux 3.19.0-11-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.17-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity
Date: Thu Apr  2 17:35:06 2015
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: vivid
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV250/M9 GL [Mobility FireGL 
9000/Radeon 9000] [1002:4c66] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:0860]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-03-03 (30 days ago)
InstallationMedia: WolfLand-Gnome-v1.8b1x86 15.04 - Release i386
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 050d:2103 Belkin Components F7D2102 802.11n N300 Micro 
Wireless Adapter v3000 [Realtek RTL8192CU]
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Pavilion zt3300 (DN545AV)
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-11-generic 
root=UUID=ec3961a8-08b6-4895-8b59-6f535d966cc1 ro forcepae quiet splash
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/07/2004
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 68BAL Ver. F.42
dmi.board.name: 0860
dmi.board.vendor: COMPAL
dmi.board.version: 8051 Version 24.54
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: COMPAL
dmi.chassis.version: NULL
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68BALVer.F.42:bd05/07/2004:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPavilionzt3300(DN545AV):pvrF.42:rvnCOMPAL:rn0860:rvr8051Version24.54:cvnCOMPAL:ct10:cvrNULL:
dmi.product.name: Pavilion zt3300 (DN545AV)
dmi.product.version: F.42
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.59-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.5.2-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.5.2-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.9.0-1ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.5.0-1ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917-1~exp1ubuntu2build1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.11-1ubuntu2build1
xserver.bootTime: Thu Apr  2 17:00:25 2015
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.devices:
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 6
 inputVideo BusKEYBOARD, id 7
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 8
 inputAT Translated Set 2 keyboard KEYBOARD, id 9
 inputSynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad TOUCHPAD, id 10
xserver.errors:
 
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.outputs: OutputLVDS S-video 
  VGA-0
xserver.version: 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3
xserver.video_driver: radeon

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu vivid

** Attachment added: Screenshot of panels with incorrect black background
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439871/+attachment/4364701/+files/Screenshot%20from%202015-03-02%2021%3A52%3A36.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439871

Title:
  Gnome Flashback Metacity: Gradient/Box Shadow on Panels gives
  incorrect black background

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1439871/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1439860] [NEW] Gnome Flashback Metacity: Artifacts on all metacity windows

2015-04-02 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

I am getting a light colored artifact around all metacity windows. Theme
being used is Vertex or Vertex-Dark for Gtk3.14.

Workaround is to restart metacity using metacity --replace  from
terminal which only works until terminal is closed.

This problem has been intermittent all of Vivid 15.04 but has become all
the time since Beta2 updates.

I will attach a screenshot of the problem to the bug report.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+7ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.19.0-11.11-generic 3.19.3
Uname: Linux 3.19.0-11-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.17-0ubuntu1
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: GNOME-Flashback:Unity
Date: Thu Apr  2 17:19:46 2015
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: vivid
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] RV250/M9 GL [Mobility FireGL 
9000/Radeon 9000] [1002:4c66] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Device [0e11:0860]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-03-03 (30 days ago)
InstallationMedia: WolfLand-Gnome-v1.8b1x86 15.04 - Release i386
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 050d:2103 Belkin Components F7D2102 802.11n N300 Micro 
Wireless Adapter v3000 [Realtek RTL8192CU]
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: Hewlett-Packard Pavilion zt3300 (DN545AV)
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=set
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.19.0-11-generic 
root=UUID=ec3961a8-08b6-4895-8b59-6f535d966cc1 ro forcepae quiet splash
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/07/2004
dmi.bios.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
dmi.bios.version: 68BAL Ver. F.42
dmi.board.name: 0860
dmi.board.vendor: COMPAL
dmi.board.version: 8051 Version 24.54
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: COMPAL
dmi.chassis.version: NULL
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnHewlett-Packard:bvr68BALVer.F.42:bd05/07/2004:svnHewlett-Packard:pnPavilionzt3300(DN545AV):pvrF.42:rvnCOMPAL:rn0860:rvr8051Version24.54:cvnCOMPAL:ct10:cvrNULL:
dmi.product.name: Pavilion zt3300 (DN545AV)
dmi.product.version: F.42
dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.59-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 10.5.2-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 10.5.2-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.9.0-1ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.5.0-1ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917-1~exp1ubuntu2build1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.11-1ubuntu2build1
xserver.bootTime: Thu Apr  2 17:00:25 2015
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.devices:
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 6
 inputVideo BusKEYBOARD, id 7
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 8
 inputAT Translated Set 2 keyboard KEYBOARD, id 9
 inputSynPS/2 Synaptics TouchPad TOUCHPAD, id 10
xserver.errors:
 
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.outputs: OutputLVDS S-video 
  VGA-0
xserver.version: 2:1.17.1-0ubuntu3
xserver.video_driver: radeon

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 ubuntu vivid

** Attachment added: Screenshot from 2015-03-21 11:12:18.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439860/+attachment/4364663/+files/Screenshot%20from%202015-03-21%2011%3A12%3A18.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1439860

Title:
  Gnome Flashback Metacity: Artifacts on all metacity windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1439860/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-25 Thread Brett Bogert
Raymond,

Monday I concentrated on trying to make any progress on getting HDMI to output 
sound
from my video card without losing the first 1 or 2 seconds of it. This is what 
I tried:

ALSA: Position fix quirking - No Effect

Pulseaudio: turned off timer scheduling - No Effect
  commented out module load for suspend on idle - No Effect
  installed pavucontrol and tried changing setting etc - No 
Effect

General: Completely removed Wine and install fglrx-updates - No Effect

I've done all I can except kernel driver patching and I just can't get the HDMI 
audio
on the video card to stop dropping the first 1 to 2 seconds of audio(maybe PCI 
bus
latency or something ?).  This happens with the System Ready sound and in the 
desktop and even playing sounds using aplay in the terminal.

Do I need to raise a bug on this HDMI Latency problem ?.

I also ran into a problem when disabling and then re-enabling the onboard sound.
It appears that the default device is correct but the System Ready sound is 
still
being output on the previous device(e,g, if I disable onboard sound in the BIOS 
to
force output to HDMI it does not return to the onboard sound when the onboard
sound is re-enabled and is still outputting on the HMDI device despite that the
default device is the onboard sound and no longer the video card). 

Do I need to raise a bug on this as well ?.

While debugging I also noticed that the fglrx-updates does not have the fields 
for
audio like the open source driver does. I am currently using xrandr to turn the
HDMI audio off so that the onboard sound can be used by adding it to startup
applications. I still don't get the System Ready sound output but at least I 
get
my desktop notifications output. I will not be able to do this when the problem
with fglrx and wine is fixed(wine is already fixed, fglrx will be next year I 
hear).

I did a clean install last night and will use xrandr to disable the HDMU audio 
output
for the time being. This will only work until the fglrx/wine dependancy problem 
is fixed and I can run the proprietary driver again.

Let me know if you need any thing else. Sorry for the bad formatting (someone
should shrink the Add comment box to the wraparound size so that formatting
takes care of itself).

Once a software developer/architect always a software
developer/architect.

Thanks again

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-23 Thread Brett Bogert
Raymond,

I spent most of the day today (Sunday) trying to see if I could make any 
progress toward
making the combined digital audio over the DVI to HDMI or HDMI to HDMI issues I 
am
having any better(e.g. no System Ready sound without disabling the onboard 
sound
in the bios and loss of the first 1 to 2 seconds of audio when output is 
initiated) and
I am sad to say I made little to no progress. 

I made multiple attempts to force HDMI to be default using methods I found that
worked for others with no progress. I also read a butt load of ALSA and 
Pulseaudio
tips, tricks and bug reports as well as design documentation from ALSA. 

I figured if I could get the HDMI digital sound on rhe Video card working 
properly I 
would not need the analog as default for anything other than the inputs 
(non-linear
 video editing and such). 

I also wanted to try the fglrx or fglrx-updates driver but there is a problem 
with
dependencies and Wine that prevents installing the driver if Wine is installed.

A few issues with HDMI were solved by using the fglrx proprietary driver so I 
thought I would give it a try until I ran into the dependency problem.

About the only thing I accomplished today was to find out that even if the
alc892 chip is disabled on the motherbord to force the HDMI to the default
(e.g. 0) entry when the alc892 chip is re-enabled the sound stays on HDMI
at least from the System Ready sound standpoint.  I checked the /proc/
asound card entries and the alc892 was listed at card 0 so I am not sure
how the System Ready sound is still being output via the HDMI output.

Other sounds played by the sox play command seem to be coming out
at the analog green output despite the desktop being set to HDMI in
the System Settings Sound dialog(AARRGGHH).

Oh well at least I am learning a bit about the linux sound systems(lol).

I will spend the rest of the evening backing up this system in case we
need to do anything nasty that might take it down and will make a
new up to date respin on my build server in case I need to reinstall
the OS at some point(e.g. we will be able to do destuctive testing if
needed).

Thanks again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
** Attachment added: xrandr --verbose for HDMI combined video and audio cable
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+attachment/4265998/+files/Bug-1394711_HDMIcombinedVideo-Audio

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
** Attachment added: xrandr --verbose for DVI to HDMI video cable and analog 
audio cable
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+attachment/4265997/+files/Bug-1394711_DVI-to-HDMI-Video_Analog-Audio

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
** Attachment added: xrandr --verbose for VGA video cable with analog audio 
cable
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+attachment/4265994/+files/Bug-1394711_VGA-Video_Analog-Audio

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
Raymond,

I have performed the requested data captures and will attach them.

I took a look at the xrandr command and decided to try a little troubleshooting 
on my own and found 
that the following xrandr command resolves the problem until the system is 
shutdown or rebooted 
(e.g. the System Settings sound tests pass and the System Ready sound is 
output if I logout):

xrandr --output DVI-0 --set audio off

So it appears that the underlying code for the audio = auto setting for DVI-0 
is incorrectly determining 
that the setting for this configuration(e.g. DVI to HDMI with analog audio) is 
on instead of off.

I can understand the confusion after looking at the DVI video
specification on wikipedia and finding this:

DVI-D devices output HDMI signals, many including audio, (examples: ATI 
3000-series and 
NVIDIA GTX 200-series video cards) ,[9] and some multimedia displays input that 
HDMI signal, 
including audio, by using a DVI to HDMI adapter. Exact capabilities vary by 
video card specifications. 

The only test I have not run is to see if the HDMI video card selection in the 
System Settings Sound
dialog will actually output sound on the DVI to HDMI cable and also resolve the 
issue. I will try this as
soon as I finish attaching the data files and will add another comment to let 
you know what the outcome
of the test is.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
** Attachment added: xrandr --verbose for DVI to HDMI video cable and analog 
audio after xrandr --output DVI-0 --set audio off command
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+attachment/4265999/+files/Bug-1394711_DVI-to-HDMI-Video_Analog-Audio-FIX

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-22 Thread Brett Bogert
Ok I have run the aforementioned test with the DVI to HDMI cable and no analog 
sound cable attached
and the System Setting Sound dialog set to the HDMI video card sound chip. This 
does output sound from 
the test application but the System Ready sound still appears to be going out 
the analog output.

To clarify the latency problem I have been having using HDMI sound on the 
video card when the sound 
test application is run initially the front left sound is missing the front 
sound. After this it works fine
until the System Settings dialog is exited and reentered  then the latency 
problem occurs again.

This also causes desktop notifications to be only partially output or not 
output at all when using the
HDMI video card's sound device. This is why I have been using the analog output 
on the motherboard
as the problem does not occur with it..

If  you need more information or want me to try something I havn't tried or 
need me to test a proposed fix
let me know and I will do so as soon as I can. 

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1394711] Re: [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-21 Thread Brett Bogert
Raymond,

Thanks for the quick response. I will gather the data 
for all three setups VGA video with analog audio, HDMI video with analog 
audio and lastly HDMI Video with combined digital audio from the video 
card either this weekend or very early next week. I have one item that I 
have to get done before I can gather the data but I should have 
something posted by early next week at the latest.

Thanks,
Brett

On 11/21/2014 02:31 AM, Raymond wrote:
 post output of

 xrandr --verbose

 ** Changed in: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Status: New = Incomplete


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1394711

Title:
  [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in
  display speakers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1394711/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1394711] [NEW] [HDA-Intel - HDA ATI SB, playback] No sound at all with built in display speakers

2014-11-20 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

Problem Description: No sound at monitors built in speakers after fresh
install of Utopic 14.10 Unity Desktop.

Details: After installing Ubuntu 14.10 I had no sound at all from the
speakers in my monitor.

After troubleshooting I determined that the output from the sound system at the 
'green' 
connector on the motherboard was fine but was not being delivered to the 
monitors speakers. 

I then replaced the audio cable from the motherboard to the monitor
which did not help.

I assumed that the analog input of the monitor had gone bad and removed a HDMI 
cable from my television 
and tried using it from the Video Card to the monitor and the sound in the 
monitor speakers worked(e.g.
HDMI with combined Video and Audio signal).  

I assumed that the analog input in the monitor had gone bad and bought a new 
HDMI cable and used it from
the Video card to the monitor. 

This did not work well however as I had to disable the audio chip on the 
motherboard to force the system 
to use the video card sound functionality to get the system ready sound to 
work. 

There was also a large latency when sending the sound signal through the video 
card to the monitor causing the 
system ready sound and desktop notifications to be cut off or not output at 
all.

A short time after this I installed the same Utopic 14.10 Unity Desktop onto 
another computer with a similar monitor
and had the same result (no sound through the monitor speakers) and discovered 
the real cause of the problem. 

The cause of the problem became appearant on the second install when the 
system ready sound was played but 
was cut off after a second or so.

After this no more sound at all was output to the monitors speakers.

For some reason in Utopic 14.10 the sound input in the monitor is being coupled 
to the video input making it impossible
to use the HDMI input for video and the monitors analog input for sound.  The 
audio input is tracking the video input
in the monitor and the audio input is switching from the analog input to the 
HDMI input if a HDMI video cable is being
used.

This lead me to the conclusion that code is switching the analog input in the 
monitor to the HDMI audio input based
on HDMI video being used and this was proven by the fact that a VGA (analog) 
video cable and analog audio cable/input
works fine as well as a combined HDMI video/audio cable working (not quite fine 
but working) and to the conclusion that
someone has coupled the Video and Audio inputs of the video monitor in the 
software in Utopic 14.10.

In short the analog audio input in the monitor is being switched to the HDMI 
audio input if a HDMI video cable is being 
used reguardless of it actually carrying audio (e.g. in my case a DVI to HDMI 
cable is only used for video and a seperate 
analog audio cable is being used to carry the audio signal to the analog input 
in the monitor).

Note that this hardware configuration seemed to work fine in Ubuntu 14.04 LTS 
(e.g. HDMI video and analog audio) and
just appeared after the fresh installs of 14.10. 

Again this problem does not occur if a VGA video cable and and the 
aforementioned analog audio cable and input are 
used and only occurs if a DVI to HDMI video cable and analog audio cable/input 
on the monitor are used. 
A HDMI combined video/audio cable works as well other than the undesirable 
characteristics described above
(e.g. having to disable onboard audio to force use of the sound on the video 
card to get  the system ready sound 
and latency problems with the audio).

Hardware specifics: Motherboards are ASUS Sabertooth and m5a97 with ASUS mx279h 
and mx239h monitors respectively.
Monitors are connected via DVI to HDMI video cables and audio is being 
delivered via an 1/8 stereo audio cable from the
green analog output at the motherboard to the analog input of the monitor.

I am not sure to who this issue belongs because I could not tell who is 
switching the audio input in the monitor.
It occurs sometime during the playing of the system ready sound (this timing 
may be specific to my hardware
configuration and may occur earlier or later depending upon the relative speed 
of the system).

I also was not sure what data to collect as I could not tell what software 
subsystem (e.g. ALSA or Display) was responsible
for the audio input in the monitor being switched.

Please let me know what data I can collect so this problem can be resolved and 
I can get back to using my DVI to HDMI
video cable and analog audio input and still have sound. In the mean time I 
have to use the VGA (analog) video cable so
that the analog input to the monitor can be used as the HDMI combined 
video/audio cable solution had undesirable
side effects.

This bug report was originated using  the ubuntu-bug command from terminal so I 
expect that some data was collected
but I am not sure if it will be what is needed to resolve the issue.

Thank You

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: alsa-base 

Re: [Bug 1299739] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-05-03 Thread Brett Bogert
Chris,

 The bios update did the trick and I have seen no more GPF's 
since applying it.

Thanks,
Brett Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

On 04/21/2014 05:10 AM, Christopher M. Penalver wrote:
 Brett Bogert, this bug report is being closed due to your last comment
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/comments/7
 regarding this being fixed by adjusting a setting in the BIOS. For
 future reference you can manage the status of your own bugs by clicking
 on the current status in the yellow line and then choosing a new status
 in the revealed drop down box. You can learn more about bug statuses at
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status. Thank you again for taking the time
 to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Please submit any
 future bugs you may find.

 ** Tags added: bios-outdated-2301

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Status: Confirmed = Invalid


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1299739] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-04-03 Thread Brett Bogert
Joseph,

 I continued testing today with the new kernel and burned 
another 11 CD's and 2 DVD's. No
 GPF's occurred so I feel pretty confident that the BIOS 
change solved the issue. I think we
 can close the bug report and list the cause as ASUS 
Optimal settings. I may have a weak
 memory chip or something that is preventing the more 
aggressive settings from working.
 We had a 4 day power outage due to an ice storm earlier 
this year and it may have had a
 negative effect on the hardware. I will have to run a 24hr 
memory test on the machine with
 the more aggressive settings after 14.04 release and see if 
I need to replace a memory chip
 or something.

 I will add an entry to the bug report stating that the 
problem has not reoccurred and why. I will
 be more aware and check my hardware and BIOS settings 
before I bug report another nebulous
 GPF of this type (e.g. the traceback was instructive and 
did not indicate any running software
 process but gut's level OS processes that could be related 
to BIOS or hardware problem).

 Thanks for your quick response and help,

B.Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

On 03/31/2014 05:53 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
 Are you able to reproduce the GPF?  If so, would it be possible for you
 to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
 v3.14 kernel[0].

 If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
 tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.

 If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag:
 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'.

 If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, 
 please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'.
 Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as 
 Confirmed.


 Thanks in advance.


 [0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14-trusty/

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided = Medium


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1299739] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-04-03 Thread Brett Bogert
Problem seems to be resolved (see above) and was caused by aggressive
timing parameters (ASUS Optimal settings) and possible weak or bad
memory chip. Once BIOS parameter was changed to ASUS Normal settings
the problem resolved itself and no more GPF's were output after burning
many more CD's/DVD's. Hardware testing will have to be done after 14.04
releases to verify weak/bad hardware is replaced and I will be more
aware that this type of GPF indicates possible BIOS/Hardware issues
before I raise another bug report of this nature.

Please close this bug report and thanks for the quick response and help,

B.Bogert

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1299739] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-04-02 Thread Brett Bogert
Joseph,

   A quick progress report on my testing. So far I have burned 6 
DVD's and 11 CD's without
   any more GPF's and the machine has been rock solid since I 
changed the BIOS setting.
   I suspect that the problem has resolved itself with the BIOS 
setting change but will continue
   to beat on it to see if I can get the problem to occur again 
with the ASUS Normal BIOS
   settings. I noticed that there is a new kernel update in the 
update queue for tonight
   (3.13.0.21-43) and I will be updating all 7 build/testing 
machines tonight and will send more
   progress info as warranted. If no more GPF's occur before 
Friday Apr 4th I think we will
   be safe to close the bug report and blame the issue on 
aggressive BIOS settings. I will keep
   machines on the normal timings instead of ASUS Optimal for 
the duration of my testing
   until 14.04 releases.

Thanks again,
B.Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

On 03/31/2014 05:53 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
 Are you able to reproduce the GPF?  If so, would it be possible for you
 to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
 v3.14 kernel[0].

 If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
 tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.

 If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag:
 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'.

 If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, 
 please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'.
 Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as 
 Confirmed.


 Thanks in advance.


 [0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14-trusty/

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided = Medium


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1299739] Re: general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-04-01 Thread Brett Bogert
Joseph,
 The GPF happened again this morning. I was burning a CD and 
it completed
 and made the ding tone and then Unity died and back to 
the Lightdm login.

 I tried to bug report it as a duplicate of 1299739 but 
launchpad oops'ed and lost the
 report and I did not have time this morning to spend any 
more time on it.

 I have made a BIOS change to ASUS Normal settings from 
ASUS Optimal settings
 to make sure the problem is not coming from aggressive 
timings and will burn some
 more CD/DVD's today to see if I can get the problem to 
happen again. The GPF happens
 infrequently  so I am not sure how long it will take to 
reproduce. I have only seen it the
 two times so far.

 If it happens again on ASUS Normal settings I will try 
the upstream kernel version and
 keep you informed of what happens.

Thanks,
B. Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com


On 03/31/2014 05:53 PM, Joseph Salisbury wrote:
 Are you able to reproduce the GPF?  If so, would it be possible for you
 to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer to
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
 v3.14 kernel[0].

 If this bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following
 tag 'kernel-fixed-upstream'.

 If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the tag:
 'kernel-bug-exists-upstream'.

 If you are unable to test the mainline kernel, for example it will not boot, 
 please add the tag: 'kernel-unable-to-test-upstream'.
 Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug as 
 Confirmed.


 Thanks in advance.


 [0] http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.14-trusty/

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided = Medium


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1298476] Re: Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

2014-04-01 Thread Brett Bogert
Edwin,

   Thanks for the workaround info. Another possible workaround 
if you don't have any other
   OS's on your machine (mine are all Ubuntu only) is to use 
GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
   thus removing it from grub.cfg making process all together. 
Of course if you are dual booting
   Windows or another OS this will not work as GRUB needs to 
probe for the other OS's in order to
   add them to the grub.cfg file. So far my machines seem to be 
working fine as long as I don't
   install using LVM and it will be interesting to see if the 
problem crops back up when I do more
   installs after I remaster when 14.04 releases.

   Thanks again for the workaround info as per your experience 
it appears that I may need it in
   the future.

B. Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

On 04/01/2014 08:47 AM, Edwin Pujols wrote:
 I still see the menu even without LVM. My PC is an HP nx7400. As a
 workaround I followed this:

 https://gist.github.com/LeahCim/9332432

 Also, here's the bug report I filed (in case your problem and mine are
 the same):

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1273764


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298476

Title:
  Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1298476/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1299739] [NEW] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP

2014-03-30 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

I was burning a CD using Brasero when the Unity desktop died and I ended
up back at the lightdm login prompt. This was the first problem of this
kind since running Trusty and occured since the latest update on
3/29/2014. The system had been completely stable up to this point.
Brasero was in the process of verifying the checksum when the problem
occured. Brasero version is 3.10.0, kernel version is 3.13.0-20-generic.
This is an ASUS Sabertooth motherboard with 4Ghz AMD 8 core and 16Gb of
memory.  This is my daily use computer and was up for several days
before the GPF occured. I am using the updates ATI proprietary driver
from the Ubuntu repository.

Let me know if I can provide any more information for you .

Thanks,
B.Bogert
bboger...@gmail.com

ProblemType: KernelOops
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.13.0-20-generic 3.13.0-20.42
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-20.42-generic 3.13.7
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-20-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be 
restarted.
ApportVersion: 2.13.3-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Mar 30 07:30:15 2014
Failure: oops
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=2018acda-0317-40ce-b43d-4165f2056510
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-03-18 (11 days ago)
InstallationMedia: WolfLand-14.04-v1.7 14.04 - Release amd64
MachineType: To be filled by O.E.M. To be filled by O.E.M.
ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-20-generic 
root=UUID=089d0b73-5482-4397-b728-01cf55d432b4 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions: kerneloops-daemon 0.12+git20090217-3ubuntu7
RfKill:
 0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
SourcePackage: linux
Title: general protection fault:  [#1] SMP
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog:
 
dmi.bios.date: 01/17/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0305
dmi.board.asset.tag: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: SABERTOOTH 990FX/GEN3 R2.0
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0305:bd01/17/2013:svnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pnTobefilledbyO.E.M.:pvrTobefilledbyO.E.M.:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnSABERTOOTH990FX/GEN3R2.0:rvrRev1.xx:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.name: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To be filled by O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To be filled by O.E.M.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-kerneloops kernel-oops trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1299739

Title:
  general protection fault:  [#1] SMP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1299739/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1296866] Re: Allow unity-panel.menuitem to paint window title text for maximized window in new Unity Decorator(Trusty)

2014-03-30 Thread Brett Bogert
Khurshid Alam is correct. According to the Unity theming documenation
for Trusty 14.04 the panel text should be set by the UnityPanelWidget as
follows:

UnityPanelWidget,
.unity-panel {
background-color: shade (@dark_bg_color, 1.5);

color: @dark_fg_color; /* Text color */   --- ***SHOULD BE SET HERE***
 }

but it is actually being set by the UnityDecoration top code here:

/* This will theme the top decoration, so the whole space above the window */
UnityDecoration.top {
border: 1px solid shade (@bg_color, 0.5);
border-bottom-width: 0;
border-radius: 8px 8px 0 0; /* Corner radius, only the top ones should be */
padding: 1px 8px 0 8px; /* This padding will be applied to the content of 
the top layout */
background-color: shade (@dark_bg_color, 1.5); /* Decoration background */
color: @dark_fg_color; /* The foreground color will be used to paint the 
text */  --- ***ACTUALLY BEING SET HERE ***
text-shadow: 1px 0 #333, -1px 0 #333, 0 1px #333, 0 -1px #333;
}

This makes it impossible to use a dark panel with light window treatment
as the title color for light window treatment is dark making the panel
label (e.g. Ubuntu Desktop) and maximized title unreadable on a dark
panel.

In short the panel text color should be set by the unity panel widget
class not by the unity decoration class.

Since this problem is already bug reported I will not open another bug
report but track progress under this bug report number.

Thanks,
B.Bogert

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296866

Title:
  Allow unity-panel.menuitem to paint window title text for maximized
  window in new Unity Decorator(Trusty)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1296866/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1298476] Re: Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

2014-03-28 Thread Brett Bogert
** Attachment added: fail case grub.cfg file
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1298476/+attachment/4048301/+files/m4a785m-lvm-grub.cfg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298476

Title:
  Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1298476/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1298476] Re: Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

2014-03-28 Thread Brett Bogert
After further investigation I found that the problem appears to be
related to installing with LVM enabled. When I installed Trusty I
encountered a problem (that started in 13.10 sometime between 11/28/13
and 1/19/14) when installing with LVM enabled over a  previous LVM
enabled installation (also happens if you try to install with LVM
enabled over a previous Windows 7 installation). This causes a warning
message that the boot partition is not large enough and the
installation may fail. On the first three machines I did not install
with LVM enabled but on the other four machines I installed with LVM. I
normally install with LVM and had no issues until this warning message
started sometime between 11/28/13 and 1/19/14 (in saucy 13.10).  For
some reason the LVM equipped machines are the ones that are showing the
menu instead of the countdown. I proved this by reinstalling Trusty on
the four machines that were displaying the menu without LVM this time
and they now work as intended. I will attach both a pass (e.g. working
countdown case: sabertooth-nonlvm-grub.cfg) as well as a failure case
(e.g. menu instead of countdown: m4a785m-lvm-grub.cfg) files.

If you need me to reinstall with LVM and collect more data let me know .

Thanks again,
B.Bogert

** Attachment added: pass case grub.cfg file
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1298476/+attachment/4048300/+files/sabertooth-nonlvm-grub.cfg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298476

Title:
  Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1298476/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1298476] [NEW] Trusty: inconsistent behaviour of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

2014-03-27 Thread Brett Bogert
Public bug reported:

For some reason GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown is not being treated in a
consistant manner on all my machines. On ASUS m4a785m(2), ASUS m5a97(1)
and ASUS p8h61m despite having the GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE set to countdown
and GRUB_TIMEOUT set to 10 in /etc/default/grub I was getting a menu. On
ASUS Sabertooth, ASUS a88xpro and another ASUS m5a97 countdown worked as
designed. After a bit of trouble shooting I found that the
/boot/grub/grub.cfg files on the offending hardware were actually
setting the GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE value to menu in a OS-PROBER block at the
end of the file despite it being set to countdown in the
/etc/default/grub file. Since the offending code was in an OS-PROBER
block I tried setting GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER to TRUE and running update-
grub which corrected the problem. Although this temporarily fixes the
problem I do not think it is addressing the real issue which is the
inconsistent setting of GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE and therefor inconsistant
behavior even on different machines of the same hardware. Since ASUS
m5a97(2 different machines) exibited both the fail and pass mode I have
to think that this is not hardware specific but possibly something going
haywire in grub_mkconfig. Here is my /etc/default/grub file with the
problem:

# If you change this file, run 'update-grub' afterwards to update
# /boot/grub/grub.cfg.
# For full documentation of the options in this file, see:
#   info -f grub -n 'Simple configuration'

GRUB_DEFAULT=0
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown

GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2 /dev/null || echo Debian`
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=

# Uncomment to enable BadRAM filtering, modify to suit your needs
# This works with Linux (no patch required) and with any kernel that obtains
# the memory map information from GRUB (GNU Mach, kernel of FreeBSD ...)
#GRUB_BADRAM=0x01234567,0xfefefefe,0x89abcdef,0xefefefef

# Uncomment to disable graphical terminal (grub-pc only)
#GRUB_TERMINAL=console

# The resolution used on graphical terminal
# note that you can use only modes which your graphic card supports via VBE
# you can see them in real GRUB with the command `vbeinfo'
#GRUB_GFXMODE=640x480

# Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass root=UUID=xxx parameter to Linux
#GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true

# Uncomment to disable generation of recovery mode menu entries
#GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY=true

# Uncomment to get a beep at grub start
#GRUB_INIT_TUNE=480 440 1

# WolfLand specific changes
export GRUB_COLOR_NORMAL=light-gray/light-gray
export GRUB_COLOR_HIGHLIGHT=magenta/light-gray

GRUB_BACKGROUND=/usr/share/backgrounds/warty-final-ubuntu-bt.png

Here is the working /etc/default/grub file:

# If you change this file, run 'update-grub' afterwards to update
# /boot/grub/grub.cfg.
# For full documentation of the options in this file, see:
#   info -f grub -n 'Simple configuration'

GRUB_DEFAULT=0
GRUB_TIMEOUT=10
GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown
GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true

GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR=`lsb_release -i -s 2 /dev/null || echo Debian`
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=quiet splash
GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX=

# Uncomment to enable BadRAM filtering, modify to suit your needs
# This works with Linux (no patch required) and with any kernel that obtains
# the memory map information from GRUB (GNU Mach, kernel of FreeBSD ...)
#GRUB_BADRAM=0x01234567,0xfefefefe,0x89abcdef,0xefefefef

# Uncomment to disable graphical terminal (grub-pc only)
#GRUB_TERMINAL=console

# The resolution used on graphical terminal
# note that you can use only modes which your graphic card supports via VBE
# you can see them in real GRUB with the command `vbeinfo'
#GRUB_GFXMODE=640x480

# Uncomment if you don't want GRUB to pass root=UUID=xxx parameter to Linux
#GRUB_DISABLE_LINUX_UUID=true

# Uncomment to disable generation of recovery mode menu entries
#GRUB_DISABLE_RECOVERY=true

# Uncomment to get a beep at grub start
#GRUB_INIT_TUNE=480 440 1

# WolfLand specific changes
export GRUB_COLOR_NORMAL=light-gray/light-gray
export GRUB_COLOR_HIGHLIGHT=magenta/light-gray

GRUB_BACKGROUND=/usr/share/backgrounds/warty-final-ubuntu-bt.png

Note that the only difference is the GRUB_DISABLE_OS_PROBER=true
directive.

I can try and recreate the problem and provide /boot/grub/grub.cfg files
if needed.

lsb-release -rd:

Description:Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch)
Release:14.04 

Grub version is 2.02~beta2-7,

Almost forgot.. I upgraded 10 machines (9 desktop and 1 laptop) to Ubuntu 
12.04.4 last night and set them up to use GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE=countdown. All 10 
machines worked as expected without any issue (a mixture of MSI and ASUS
hardware) so the problem seems to be related to Trusty(e.g. 14.04) only.

Thanks,
B.Bogert

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298476

Title:
  Trusty: