[Bug 331675] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-8-generic 2.6.28-8.24 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2

[C. Brayton]

I did not understand the questions put to me by the Apport application.
Is this (2.6.32-11-generic-pae) the upstream kernel? I have no idea. I
was installing source and headers for that kernel because the Nvidia
driver installer (the OEM's; I have no patience and insufficient wisdom
to ken the distro's) asked for them.

-- 
package linux-image-2.6.28-8-generic 2.6.28-8.24 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331675
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 510540] Re: suspended to disk by selecting from menu, then closed lid. On opening lid, an Apport kernel message, along with loss of Nvidia configuration (cloned external TwinView screen)

[C. Brayton]

** Attachment added: "lspci-vnvn.log"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180460/lspci-vnvn.log

** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180461/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180462/AplayDevices.txt

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180463/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180464/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180465/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt

** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180466/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180467/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180468/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180469/IwConfig.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180470/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180471/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: "OopsText.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180472/OopsText.txt

** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180473/PciMultimedia.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180474/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180475/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180476/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180477/RfKill.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180478/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180479/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38180480/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
suspended to disk by selecting from menu, then closed lid. On opening lid, an 
Apport kernel message, along with loss of Nvidia configuration (cloned external 
TwinView screen) 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 510540] [NEW] suspended to disk by selecting from menu, then closed lid. On opening lid, an Apport kernel message, along with loss of Nvidia configuration (cloned external TwinView screen)

[C. Brayton]

Public bug reported:

Not much to say, similar to other bugs reported with laptop lid switches
but produced in a different way: select suspend from shutdown applet,
close lid, reopen lid, and Apport message appears. NVIDIA configuration
(TwinView, clones) is lost and must be reset through nvidia-settings.

ProblemType: KernelOops
Annotation: Your system might become unstable now and might need to be 
restarted.
Architecture: i386
ArecordDevices:
  List of CAPTURE Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: STAC92xx Analog [STAC92xx Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  obicho 2088 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  obicho 2088 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xefffc000 irq 21'
   Mixer name   : 'SigmaTel STAC9200'
   Components   : 'HDA:83847690,102801c2,00102201 
HDA:14f12bfa,14f100c3,0009'
   Controls  : 12
   Simple ctrls  : 7
Card1.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:1 'Audio'/'C-Media INC. USB Audio at usb-:00:1d.2-2, full speed'
   Mixer name   : 'USB Mixer'
   Components   : 'USB0d8c:0001'
   Controls  : 2
   Simple ctrls  : 1
Card1.Amixer.values:
 Simple mixer control 'PCM',0
   Capabilities: pvolume pvolume-joined pswitch pswitch-joined
   Playback channels: Mono
   Limits: Playback 0 - 37
   Mono: Playback 30 [81%] [14.00dB] [on]
Date: Thu Jan 21 06:06:47 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
Failure: oops
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=45ffcb5b-a148-417e-a4bb-cd7aaa008df6
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release i386 (20091027)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Latitude D620
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-14-generic 2.6.31-14.48
PccardctlIdent:
 Socket 0:
   no product info available
PccardctlStatus:
 Socket 0:
   no card
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-14-generic 
root=UUID=369178dd-b9ca-4627-b238-08d7cf5cc71a ro quiet splash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.31-14-generic N/A
 linux-firmware 1.24
SourcePackage: linux
Tags: kernel-oops
Title: WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernel/power/suspend_test.c:52 
suspend_test_finish+0x80/0x90()
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686
dmi.bios.date: 05/16/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A10
dmi.board.name: 0JK187
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.chassis.type: 8
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA10:bd05/16/2008:svnDellInc.:pnLatitudeD620:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0JK187:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct8:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Latitude D620
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-kerneloops i386 kernel-oops

-- 
suspended to disk by selecting from menu, then closed lid. On opening lid, an 
Apport kernel message, along with loss of Nvidia configuration (cloned external 
TwinView screen) 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/510540
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 508670] Re: Warning after laptop went to sleep (suspended)

[C. Brayton]

Same here, on a Dell Latitude D620 with Core 2 (T2500) after a fresh
Karmic install (CPU frequency scaling finally works!)

-- 
Warning after laptop went to sleep (suspended)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/508670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 500250] Re: lucid Live CD boots to login screen

[C. Brayton]

"Just ctrl+alt+f1, then create a new user account & password w/root
privileges." That worked on the LiveCD but when I installed a later
image on a stick I started getting "cannot lock /etc/passwd ..." Grr. I
will try editing the .conf file, thank you.

-- 
lucid Live CD boots to login screen
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500250
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 504052] Re: [lucid] No plymouth at boot time and mountall error

[C. Brayton]

Never mind, brain fart. Does anyone have a workaround for this? I have
idiotically uninstalled plymouth, trying to chroot into the system from
a Live CD and reinstall ...

-- 
[lucid] No plymouth at boot time and mountall error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 504052] Re: [lucid] No plymouth at boot time and mountall error

[C. Brayton]

I have noticed that the unexpected disconnect from boot status daemon
error is associated with the message "switching to color frame buffer
device." The latter seems to cause the problem whereby one cannot use
alt+ctl+Fx to drop into a shell. I am going to try to boot with the
"nofb" or the equivalent "vga=normal" paramenter  This is fuzzy
logic, I know, but let us run it up the flagpole ...

-- 
[lucid] No plymouth at boot time and mountall error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504052
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 410043] Re: Wrong /proc/cpuinfo information with Q9550 Intel Core 2 CPU

[C. Brayton]

Note: This problem first showed up in 9.10, I guess after the kernel
developers compiled acpi-cpufreq into the kernel instead of leaving it
as a module. I have been really been racking my brains about how to get
more information about the problem. What process changes these settings?

I came across a thread discussion among Level 10 kernel mages in which
such issues were discussed in depth using output from a kernel compiled
with CPUFREQ_DEBUG=y ... Could that be baked into in-development kernels
in the future? Again, I feel sure there are many, many laptop users with
this problem.

** Attachment added: "cpufreq-info"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37970800/cpufreq-info.txt

-- 
Wrong /proc/cpuinfo information with Q9550 Intel Core 2 CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410043
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 410043] Re: Wrong /proc/cpuinfo information with Q9550 Intel Core 2 CPU

[C. Brayton]

This has been bedeviling me for quite some time now as well: cpufreq-
info presents incorrect information about my T2500 Intel Core 2 CPU
(attached).

SysRescueCD, Puppy Linux, and other live CDs detect the correct MHz for
both cores: 1997.xx

I can't help but believe this problem is related to my problem with CPU
frequency scaling. On logging into Gnome, the ondemand governor steps
the two cores between 1.0GHz and 2.0GHz, as I wish, and as confirmed by
cpufreq-info. A short time later, the processors are set to the lowest
frequency, and cpufreq-info has the governor scaling between 1000Mhz and
1000Mhz.

I know from googling forums that this is a very, very common problem.  I
thought I had found a solution with a combination of boot options set in
GRUB and selected by brute-force testing of one combination after
another among boot options recommended in the fora -- "noapm,
acpi=noirq, pnpacpi=off"

This may have been broken by the last update of 10.04 Lucid. Just a wild
guess.

uname -a = macunaimachine 2.6.32-10-generic #14-Ubuntu SMP Thu Jan 7
17:38:40 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux


** Attachment added: "cat /proc/cpuinfo"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37970717/proc.cpuinfo.txt

-- 
Wrong /proc/cpuinfo information with Q9550 Intel Core 2 CPU
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410043
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 506260] Re: hald-probe-input assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/lib/hal/hald-probe-input: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x080492f9 ***

[C. Brayton]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 500723 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500723

Wow, apport worked! Did not notice any effect of this error on
performance of machine. Thx, cb

Em Qua, 2010-01-13 às 19:07 +, Charlie Kravetz escreveu:
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 500723 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500723
> 
> Changed bug #500723 so it is now viewable
> 

-- 
Colin Brayton 
Boi Zebu Editorial Services

-- 
hald-probe-input assert failure: *** glibc detected *** 
/usr/lib/hal/hald-probe-input: munmap_chunk(): invalid pointer: 0x080492f9 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506260
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 88899] Re: cpufreq locked in slowest speed

[C. Brayton]

Problem persists in Lucid 10.04Alpha1 (2.6.312-10) as in all releases
after acpi-cpufreq was compiled in rather than left as a module. I
cannot detect what is triggering the cpufreq governor to suddenly be set
to that "between minimum and minimum," according to cpufreq-info. That
it happens after a period of time in operation suggests it could be a
temperature threshhold, but I thought I reset mine to 85-100 (reasonable
for my Latitude D620, which tends to run between 60-75 degrees C.)

I am not seeing any kernel messages to this effect, though.

I am a poetry-major lower-end poweruser, and this has been driving me
nuts for weeks and weeks. On suggestion of various fora, I recompiled a
buggy DSDT, played with commandline options at bootup, and other stuff.
Tried powernowd -d -vvv and noticed that it seemed to be working at
first, resetting freqs according to the rules, at some point its started
showing close to 100% CPU usage and indicating freq resets to the
maximum that were not actually occurring.

Funny, though: it seems as though the Lucid daily LiveCD, booted off a
USB stick, does not have this problem.

-- 
cpufreq locked in slowest speed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 177076] Re: acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220

[C. Brayton]

As u can see, my laptop is a Dell Latitude with a T2500 processor ...

-- 
acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 177076] Re: acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220

[C. Brayton]

from dmesg | grep CPU (attached)

What does the following mean?

"[   40.806951] CPUFREQ: Per core ondemand sysfs interface is deprecated
"

** Attachment added: "CPU.dmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37714713/CPU.dmesg.txt

-- 
acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 177076] Re: acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220

[C. Brayton]

in lucid, with grub2, add acpi_osi=\\\"!Windows 2006\\\" to
/etc/default/grub (or to /boot/grub.menu.lst, under boot parameters for
kernel to be loaded).

This fix, however, did not work for me. I still boot up, login, have
frequency scaling working properly (governor ondemand -d 100 -u
200) for a period of time (which varies), and then cpu falls to
lowest freq and is stuck there. (Forum browsing suggests this may be
DSDT-related. Sadly, the Ginkel Fix is no longer available.)

After this occurs, I get the following readings

(1) cpufreq-info (note the maddeningly persistent "between [minimum] and
[minimum]"):

analyzing CPU 0:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 0
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 1000 MHz - 2.00 GHz
  available frequency steps: 2.00 GHz, 1.67 GHz, 1.33 GHz, 1000 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 1000 MHz and 1000 MHz.
  The governor "userspace" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 1000 MHz (asserted by call to hardware).
  cpufreq stats: 2.00 GHz:2.16%, 1.67 GHz:20.58%, 1.33 GHz:5.83%, 1000 
MHz:71.43%  (815)
analyzing CPU 1:
  driver: acpi-cpufreq
  CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 0 1
  CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 1
  maximum transition latency: 10.0 us.
  hardware limits: 1000 MHz - 2.00 GHz
  available frequency steps: 2.00 GHz, 1.67 GHz, 1.33 GHz, 1000 MHz
  available cpufreq governors: conservative, ondemand, userspace, powersave, 
performance
  current policy: frequency should be within 1000 MHz and 1000 MHz.
  The governor "ondemand" may decide which speed to use
  within this range.
  current CPU frequency is 1000 MHz (asserted by call to hardware).
  cpufreq stats: 2.00 GHz:2.02%, 1.67 GHz:0.21%, 1.33 GHz:4.80%, 1000 
MHz:92.97%  (438)

(2) cat /proc/cpuinfo

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
aperfmperf pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3995.08
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
aperfmperf pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3994.66
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

(3) lscpu:

Architecture:  i686
CPU(s):2
Thread(s) per core:1
Core(s) per socket:2
CPU socket(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family:6
Model: 14
Stepping:  8
CPU MHz:   1000.000
Virtualization:VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache:  2048K

-- 
acpi-cpufreq doesn't allow >800Mhz on Fujistu T4220
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177076
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 64133] Re: CPU not detected on a Compaq Proliant 3000 dual P II 400 Mhz

[C. Brayton]

Disabling CPU Frequency Control (speedstep) in BIOS, I get the
following, but the CPU is running near 100% with just a few apps open in
XFCE:

cbray...@macunaimachine:~/Desktop/Leituras$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1997.368
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
aperfmperf pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3994.73
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1997.368
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
aperfmperf pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3994.73
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

-- 
CPU not detected on a Compaq Proliant 3000 dual P II 400 Mhz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64133
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 64133] Re: CPU not detected on a Compaq Proliant 3000 dual P II 400 Mhz

[C. Brayton]

I have had this problem in both 2.6.31-17 and 2.6.32-9 (both generic and
using the compiled-in acpi-cpufreq)

cat /proc/cpuinfo yields

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
aperfmperf pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3994.65
clflush size: 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual

The CPU is a Duo 2 T2500 @2GHz, as shown, but the GHz is shown as 1GHz.
This throttles down my CPU to a maximum of 1GHz, making frequency
scaling impossible. I have tried disabling scaling in BIOS (Dell
Latitude D620, v.A10) to at least get the cpu to run at a constant 2GHz
so I can work while waiting for a fix. No joy so far. Have even thought
of compiling the old speedstep-centrino driver as a module, but not done
with that time-intensive experiment yet.

clscpu yields:

c
cbray...@macunaimachine:~/Desktop/Leituras$ lscpu
Architecture:  i686
CPU(s):2
Thread(s) per core:1
Core(s) per socket:2
CPU socket(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family:6
Model: 14
Stepping:  8
CPU MHz:   1000.000
Virtualization:VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache:  2048K
c

-- 
CPU not detected on a Compaq Proliant 3000 dual P II 400 Mhz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64133
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 442065] Re: update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/powernowd.early missing LSB information

[C. Brayton]

Me, too (Karmic)

update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/powernowd.early missing LSB information
update-rc.d: see 
FATAL: Error inserting phc_intel 
(/lib/modules/2.6.31-17-generic/extra/phc-intel.ko): Device or resource busy
FATAL: Error running install command for acpi_cpufreq
 * Starting powernowd... [ OK ]

-- 
update-rc.d: warning: /etc/init.d/powernowd.early missing LSB information
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/442065
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 469636] Re: Wrong CPU frequencies reported, cannot run max freq

[C. Brayton]

This is precisely my problem, too (Ubuntu 9.10 Intel Duo 2 T2500 kernel
2.9.31-17-generic.

dmsg says:

[0.00] Detected 1997.533 MHz processor.

but /proc/cpuinfo assigns 1.0GHz to both cores, and as a result
scaling_max_freq is limited to 1.0GHz, and cannot be manually reset.

At boot, cpufreq-info shows that all is well: governor=ondemand,
maximum=2GHz minimum=1GHz. Within a few minutes, however, some process
(which!?) changes those values. Now my min=my max: "between 1GHz and
1GHz."

Sorry, a bit sloppy, this report. Majored in poetry.

cpuinfo after the governor and freq settings are changed :

processor   : 0
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 0
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 0
initial apicid  : 0
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3995.06
clflush size: 64
power management:

processor   : 1
vendor_id   : GenuineIntel
cpu family  : 6
model   : 14
model name  : Genuine Intel(R) CPU   T2500  @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 8
cpu MHz : 1000.000
cache size  : 2048 KB
physical id : 0
siblings: 2
core id : 1
cpu cores   : 2
apicid  : 1
initial apicid  : 1
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
fpu : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level : 10
wp  : yes
flags   : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov 
clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe constant_tsc arch_perfmon bts 
pni monitor vmx est tm2 xtpr pdcm
bogomips: 3994.66
clflush size: 64
power management:

-- 
Wrong CPU frequencies reported, cannot run max freq
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/469636
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 324211] Re: AMD X2 CPU stuck at 1Ghz lowest speed

[C. Brayton]

PS: CPU temp is not reaching a threshold that would trigger this
adjustment, I think.

-- 
AMD X2 CPU stuck at 1Ghz lowest speed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 324211] Re: AMD X2 CPU stuck at 1Ghz lowest speed

[C. Brayton]

Me, too, on a Latitude D620 with Duo 2 CPU (2GHz), running 9.10 Karmic
(2.6.31-17-generic).

But with a twist.

After booting, cpufreq-info shows that all is well: the ondemand
governor is managing steps between 1GHz and 2GHz, the machine is humming
along, moving to higher or lower steps as needed.

But after a certain amount of time, something (acpi-cpufreq?)
automatically changes those settings and I am stuck on the lowest
setting on both CPU 0 and CPU 1:

política atual: a frequência deveria estar entre 1000 MHz e 1000 MHz. O
governor "userspace" deve decidir qual velocidade usar dentro desse
limite.

(My machine speaks Portuguese, but you can see that the interval is between 
1GHz and 1GHz. I changed the governor to userspace in a bid to manually set 
freq to 2GHz with echo 200 > 
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_cur_freq
 or cpufreq-selector -f 200)

I have seen many similar complaints in the forums.

BIOS has no settings like the ones mentioned by everflux (note #23).

I have uninstalled all cpufreq demons (kpowersave, cpudyn, cpufreqd,
powernowd).

Canonical Kernel Team, ride to the rescue!

-- 
AMD X2 CPU stuck at 1Ghz lowest speed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs