[Bug 1940920] Re: upgrade problem when using packages from security (docker.io and containerd)
Looks related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1939140 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940920 Title: upgrade problem when using packages from security (docker.io and containerd) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1940920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1792085] Re: MTP not working/very slow on Bionic
Like others reported here, I observe the same problem (slowness) with my Samsung Galaxy A5 and ubuntu-18.04. I tried Android File Transfer as suggested in comment #10, and it's indeed way faster. That being said, I had to switch my phone to using the "Image transfer protocol" (MTP (or PTP?), not sure what's the actual name in english), and it seems this also sped up access via Thunar. Switching back to "File transfer protocol", the access is again very slow under Thunar. As other complained, this was reported 1 year ago, and apparently no progress? (No even a "OK I could reproduce the problem...) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792085 Title: MTP not working/very slow on Bionic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/libmtp/+bug/1792085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232872] Re: NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04
I had traced this down to a problem with LibreOffice apparently not releasing the locks. I added comments to https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75488 So, the problem is still here, but no one seems to care upstream. ** Bug watch added: Document Foundation Bugzilla #75488 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75488 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232872 Title: NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1232872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1771063] [NEW] package readline-common 7.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: package readline-common is already installed and configured
Public bug reported: I got this error while upgrading my x86_64 laptop from Ubuntu 17.10 to 18.04. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 Package: readline-common 7.0-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-20.21-generic 4.15.17 Uname: Linux 4.15.0-20-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7 AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1+bzr982-0ubuntu19 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun May 13 22:30:40 2018 DuplicateSignature: package:readline-common:7.0-3 Unpacking fonts-smc-uroob (2.0-1) ... dpkg: error processing package libmpfr6 (--configure): no package named 'libmpfr6' is installed, cannot configure ErrorMessage: package readline-common is already installed and configured InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-04-07 (1132 days ago) InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 14.10 "Utopic Unicorn" - Release amd64 (20141022.1) PackageArchitecture: all Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.5, python3-minimal, 3.6.5-3 PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 2.7.15~rc1-1 RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2 apt 1.6.1 SourcePackage: dpkg Title: package readline-common 7.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: package readline-common is already installed and configured UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-05-13 (0 days ago) ** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: already-installed amd64 apport-package bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1771063 Title: package readline-common 7.0-3 failed to install/upgrade: package readline-common is already installed and configured To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1771063/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766624] Re: AArch64 kernel panic on APM Mustang
Hello, The same problem happened 2 days ago (same machine). Here is what I found in kern.log: [645048.763978] Unhandled fault: alignment fault (0x9621) at 0x1cd7237a [645048.771350] Internal error: : 9621 [#1] SMP [645048.775943] Modules linked in: veth xt_nat xt_tcpudp ipt_MASQUERADE nf_nat_masquerade_ipv4 xfrm_user xfrm_algo iptable_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_defrag_ipv4 nf_nat_ipv4 xt_addrtype iptable_filter ip_tables xt_conntrack x_tables nf_nat nf_conntrack br_netfilter bridge stp llc overlay shpchp xgene_edac edac_core xhci_plat_hcd xgene_rng uio_pdrv_genirq uio nfsd ib_iser auth_rpcgss rdma_cm iw_cm nfs_acl lockd ib_cm grace ib_sa sunrpc ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi autofs4 btrfs raid10 raid456 async_raid6_recov async_memcpy async_pq async_xor async_tx xor raid6_pq libcrc32c raid1 raid0 multipath linear realtek ahci_xgene libahci_platform xgene_enet libahci mdio_xgene aes_neon_blk ablk_helper cryptd [645048.841724] CPU: 4 PID: 20821 Comm: aarch64-unknown Not tainted 4.4.0-101-generic #124-Ubuntu [645048.850290] Hardware name: AppliedMicro Mustang/Mustang, BIOS 1.1.0 Apr 22 2015 [645048.857647] task: 8003e7f9 ti: 8003eb794000 task.ti: 8003eb794000 [645048.865180] PC is at _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x24/0x60 [645048.870292] LR is at try_to_wake_up+0x44/0x3a8 [645048.874797] pc : [] lr : [] pstate: 61c5 [645048.882240] sp : 8003eb797b40 [645048.885620] x29: 8003eb797b40 x28: 0075 [645048.891009] x27: 8001158f2a00 x26: 8001d3177bf0 [645048.896397] x25: 8003eb66c0c8 x24: 8001d3177c00 [645048.901785] x23: x22: 0003 [645048.907174] x21: 1cd7237a x20: [645048.912563] x19: 1cd7237a x18: 0a03 [645048.917950] x17: 996c9010 x16: 80210960 [645048.923338] x15: 7fff x14: [645048.928727] x13: x12: [645048.934115] x11: 8000f70bd100 x10: 012e [645048.939502] x9 : 8093fee8 x8 : [645048.944891] x7 : 8003eb66c528 x6 : 8003eb66c190 [645048.950279] x5 : x4 : 0001 [645048.955667] x3 : x2 : [645048.961056] x1 : 0003 x0 : 01c0 [645048.966443] [645048.968011] Process aarch64-unknown (pid: 20821, stack limit = 0x8003eb794020) [645048.975627] Stack: (0x8003eb797b40 to 0x8003eb798000) [645048.981430] 7b40: 8003eb797b60 800f28b4 1cd71cd6 8003ee0c8000 [645048.989305] 7b60: 8003eb797bc0 800f2c40 1cd71cd6 0001 [645048.997179] 7b80: 8001d3177bf0 8001d3177be8 8001d3177bf0 8001d3177c00 [645049.005055] 7ba0: 8003eb66c0c8 8001d3177bf0 8001158f2a00 0075 [645049.012929] 7bc0: 8003eb797be0 8011433c 1cd71cd6 8020eb1c [645049.020805] 7be0: 8003eb797c20 8090ef30 8001d3177be8 0001 [645049.028680] 7c00: 80db2000 8001d3177bc0 8020b790 [645049.036554] 7c20: 8003eb797cb0 8090e320 8001d3177be8 [645049.044428] 7c40: 8003eb66c708 8001d3177bc0 [645049.052303] 7c60: 8003eb66c0c8 8001d3177be0 8001158f2a00 8003eb66c4e0 [645049.060177] 7c80: 8003eb66c320 800392b93c88 800392b93c88 8003e7f9 [645049.068051] 7ca0: 8003 cb88537fdc8ba65f 8003eb797cd0 8020c640 [645049.075926] 7cc0: 8003eb66c4b0 8003eb797d70 8020ccb8 [645049.083800] 7ce0: 8003eb66c0c8 8003eb66c4b0 995fd000 [645049.091676] 7d00: 80eb4000 8001158f2a00 8003eb797eb0 [645049.099550] 7d20: 000f 0075 80eb4000 [645049.107425] 7d40: 158f2a00 012e 8000f70bd100 995ee000 [645049.115300] 7d60: 995fd000 8003eb797db0 8020e104 [645049.123175] 7d80: 8001158f2a00 8003eb66c4b0 995fd000 [645049.131049] 7da0: 995ee000 995fd000 8003eb797df0 80210920 [645049.138925] 7dc0: 8003eb66c4b0 0070 [645049.146799] 7de0: 8003eb797e50 80210aa0 [645049.154673] 7e00: 995fd000 0070 995fd000 80db2000 [645049.162548] 7e20: 995ee000 [645049.170422] 7e40: 8003eb66c4b0 8003eb794000 e789cea0 80085df0 [645049.178296] 7e60: 0003 996ca888 [645049.186171] 7e80: 0015 011d 0
[Bug 1699637] Re: g_object_unref: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
Hi, I've just upgraded my x86_64 laptop to Ubuntu 17.10, and I believe I'm hitting the same problem. In short, I can't login from the lightdm greeter: it accepts my password, the login process starts and immediately stops and comes back to the lightdm greeter. It worked well before I upgraded I had warnings about pam-kwallet.so, which I "solved" by installing libpam-kwallet and libpam-kwallet5 packages, and manually created /lib/security symlink pointing to /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/security. This fixed the warnings, but not the login problem :( The next thing I noticed is the error message mentioned in this bug report. My /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log file contains: [+0.00s] DEBUG: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/lightdm.log [+0.01s] DEBUG: Starting Light Display Manager 1.24.0, UID=0 PID=1208 [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration dirs from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-disable-guest.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-disable-log-backup.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-greeter-wrapper.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-guest-wrapper.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-unity-greeter.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/50-xserver-command.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/60-lightdm-gtk-greeter.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration dirs from /usr/local/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration dirs from /etc/xdg/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/10-xubuntu.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: [SeatDefaults] is now called [Seat:*], please update this configuration [+0.01s] DEBUG: Loading configuration from /etc/lightdm/lightdm.conf [+0.01s] DEBUG: [SeatDefaults] is now called [Seat:*], please update this configuration [+0.01s] DEBUG: Registered seat module local [+0.01s] DEBUG: Registered seat module xremote [+0.01s] DEBUG: Registered seat module unity [+0.01s] DEBUG: Using D-Bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager [+0.20s] DEBUG: Monitoring logind for seats [+0.20s] DEBUG: New seat added from logind: seat0 [+0.20s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Loading properties from config section Seat:* [+0.20s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Starting [+0.20s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Creating greeter session [+0.20s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Creating display server of type x [+0.20s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Plymouth is running on VT 1, but this is less than the configured minimum of 7 so not replacing it [+0.20s] DEBUG: Quitting Plymouth [+0.34s] DEBUG: Using VT 7 [+0.34s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Starting local X display on VT 7 [+0.34s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/x-0.log [+0.34s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Writing X server authority to /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 [+0.34s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Launching X Server [+0.34s] DEBUG: Launching process 1296: /usr/bin/X -core :0 -seat seat0 -auth /var/run/lightdm/root/:0 -nolisten tcp vt7 -novtswitch [+0.34s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Waiting for ready signal from X server :0 [+0.34s] DEBUG: Acquired bus name org.freedesktop.DisplayManager [+0.34s] DEBUG: Registering seat with bus path /org/freedesktop/DisplayManager/Seat0 [+0.35s] DEBUG: Loading users from org.freedesktop.Accounts [+0.35s] DEBUG: User /org/freedesktop/Accounts/User1001 added [+0.36s] DEBUG: User /org/freedesktop/Accounts/User1027 added [+1.32s] DEBUG: Got signal 10 from process 1296 [+1.32s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Got signal from X server :0 [+1.32s] DEBUG: XServer 0: Connecting to XServer :0 [+2.21s] CRITICAL: g_object_unref: assertion 'G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed [+2.21s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Display server ready, starting session authentication [+2.21s] DEBUG: Session pid=1362: Started with service 'lightdm-greeter', username 'lightdm' [+2.23s] DEBUG: Session pid=1362: Authentication complete with return value 0: Success [+2.23s] DEBUG: Seat seat0: Session authenticated, running command [+2.23s] DEBUG: Session pid=1362: Running command /usr/lib/lightdm/lightdm-greeter-session /usr/sbin/lightdm-gtk-greeter [+2.23s] DEBUG: Creating shared data directory /var/lib/lightdm-data/lightdm [+2.23s] DEBUG: Session pid=1362: Logging to /var/log/lightdm/seat0-greeter.log [+2.29s] DEBUG: Activating VT 7 [+2.29s] DEBUG: Activating login1 session c1 [+2.29s] DEBUG: Seat seat0 changes active session to c1 [+2.29s] DEBUG: Session c1 is already active [+2.49s] DEBUG: Greeter connected version=1.24.0 api=1 resettable=false [+2.83s] DEBUG: Greeter start authentication for lyon [+2.83s] DEBUG: Session pid=1422: Started with service 'lightdm', username 'lyon' [+2.84s] DEBUG: Session pid=1422: Got 1 message(s) from PAM [+2.84s] DEBUG: Prompt greeter with 1 message(s) [+11.59s] DEBUG: Continue authentication [+11.76s
[Bug 1730753] [NEW] Cannot connect to Canon Pixma MG5150 printer after upgrade to Ubuntu 17.10
Public bug reported: Hello, After I upgraded my computer (amd64) from Ubuntu 17.04 to 17.10, I can no longer use my Canon Pixma MG5150 printer. The existing printer still appears as the default printer, but the documents do not get printed, despite it is active etc... I tried to create another printer, choosing USB as connection method, and I'm offered with a prompt to open Ubuntu "Software" to install the relevant driver, but then I get to a page saying the needed driver was not found. At this stage the printer does not work, and I noticed this in the logs: [ 135.171773] usblp0: removed [ 135.192165] usblp 2-2:1.1: usblp0: USB Bidirectional printer dev 2 if 1 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04A9 pid 0x1748 lsusb says: Bus 002 Device 002: ID 04a9:1748 Canon, Inc. Pixma MG5150 As a workaround, I installed Canon's drivers manually from http://fr.software.canon-europe.com/index.asp (cnijfilter-common, cnijfilter-mg5100series, scangearmp-common and scangearmp-mg5100series). I also had install the old libtiff4 from Ubuntu precise (only libtiff5 is now normally installed). Is my printer now unsupported by gutenprint or is it a bug/regression? Thanks ** Affects: gutenprint (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1730753 Title: Cannot connect to Canon Pixma MG5150 printer after upgrade to Ubuntu 17.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gutenprint/+bug/1730753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624715] Re: rpc.statd not started automatically
This worked, thanks! Is there going to be a package update or should I manually apply this to all my machines? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624715 Title: rpc.statd not started automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1624715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
I've installed the proposed the package (on zesty), removed my workaround in /etc/rc.local, rebooted and it seems to work. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1690898] Re: s-nail alternatives missing in zesty
Thanks, this was very informative. I managed to update mailutils.conf to do want I wanted, so I guess I won't need s-nail, sorry. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690898 Title: s-nail alternatives missing in zesty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s-nail/+bug/1690898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1690898] [NEW] s-nail alternatives missing in zesty
Public bug reported: Hello, Until Ubuntu 16.10, I had alternatives pointing to s-nail (mail, mailx, ), which is no longer the case after I upgraded to 17.04. Now, I have alternatives pointing to mailutils (which got installed when I installed google-earth-stable). My problem being that the replacement is not 100% compatible. Is this is bug in s-nail, or a feature of the new version? I tried to uninstall mailutils, uninstall+re-install s-nail but this did recreate the alternative links. ** Affects: s-nail (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690898 Title: s-nail alternatives missing in zesty To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s-nail/+bug/1690898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
In case it helps other people, here is the workaround I use, in /etc/rc.local: = while ! grep -q nameserver /etc/resolv.conf do sleep 30 done cp /etc/resolv.conf /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf /etc/init.d/postfix restart = -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1661992] [NEW] postfix race condition with DHCP, copies an empty resolv.conf
Public bug reported: Hello, I think there is a race condition at startup between postfix and DHCP (or the network startup code), leading to an empty copy of resolv.conf. Specifically, I'm running Ubuntu 16.10 on an x86_64 workstation, which gets its network configuration via DHCP. I am also using postfix, and since "a few weeks", the outgoing mails are pending in the mail queue until I do 'service postfix restart', which updates postfix's copy of resolv.conf in /var/spool/postfix/etc/resolv.conf. When I say since "a few weeks", it's because I'm not exactly sure when the problem appeared, but for sure it used to work. I'd say the problem appeared when I upgraded from 16.04 to 16.10. ** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661992 Title: postfix race condition with DHCP, copies an empty resolv.conf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1661992/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1519331] Re: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop
Which package was updated to fix this problem in Zesty? I could try to upgrade it only (I'm not ready to upgrade the whole distro). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1519331 Title: Postfix cannot resolve DNS if network was unavailable when it was started, such as on a laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1519331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1586239] Re: package hexchat-plugins 2.12.0-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/hexchat-plugin.pc', which is also in package hexchat 2.10.
It wasn't fixed for the yakkety release, I just got this problem while upgrading. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586239 Title: package hexchat-plugins 2.12.0-2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/pkgconfig/hexchat- plugin.pc', which is also in package hexchat 2.10.2-1ubuntu3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hexchat/+bug/1586239/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624715] Re: rpc.statd not started automatically
FWIW, I'm *not* using NIS (as is the case in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpcbind/+bug/1558196 referenced above. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624715 Title: rpc.statd not started automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1624715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1624715] [NEW] rpc.statd not started automatically
Public bug reported: Hello, I've noticed that if my NFS mounts do not have the 'auto' option, rpc.statd does not start automatically, without a password. When I try to mount the share, I'm prompted for the sudo password, in order to start rpc.statd. If the current user does not know the password, he cannot start rpc.statd and thus cannot mount the share. Here is a sample session: $ mount /media/xxx [a popup window opens to prompt for a password, choose "cancel"] Failed to start rpc-statd.service: Access denied See system logs and 'systemctl status rpc-statd.service' for details. mount.nfs: rpc.statd is not running but is required for remote locking. mount.nfs: Either use '-o nolock' to keep locks local, or start statd. mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified /var/log/syslog contains: Sep 17 20:22:41 mcqueen rpc.statd[5160]: Opening /run/rpc.statd.pid failed: Permission denied $ systemctl status rpc-statd.service ● rpc-statd.service - NFS status monitor for NFSv2/3 locking. Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/rpc-statd.service; enabled; vendor preset Active: inactive (dead) /etc/fstab entry: 192.168.0.5:/volume1/documents /media/xxx nfs user,noauto0 0 Of course, if I enter the sudo password, or if I manually start rpc.statd as root before trying to mount, the mount operation succeeds. Similarly, if I replace "noauto" with "auto", rpc.statd is started during the boot sequence, and everything works. Yet, I'd expect that any user be able to mount this share, since it has the "user" option. Problem currently noticed with ubuntu 16.04. nfs-common: Installed: 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12 Candidate: 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12 Version table: *** 1:1.2.8-9ubuntu12 500 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624715 Title: rpc.statd not started automatically To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/1624715/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
I have posted a GCC patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg01986.html to change the default of -mpc-relative-literal-loads when -mfix-cortex-a53-843419 is used. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
I prefer you submit the Makefile patch upstream, since I'm not very familiar with kernel lists. I am going to look at a patch for GCC-6, such that this optimization is disabled by default when compiling with -mfix-cortex-a53-843419. You could then use -mfix-cortex-a53-843419 to compile the kernel, instead of -mpc-relative-literal-loads. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
Updating arch/arm64/Makefile to have: ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419), y) KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE+= -mcmodel=large KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE+= $(call cc-option, -mpc-relative-literal-loads) endif does the trick. Is this a good solution for you? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
We backported fixes for GCC PR63304 (https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304) in our 2015.12 snapshot. By default, GCC now uses adrp / ldr or adrp / add instructions to address the literal pools under the use of a command line option, and this mode is on by default. OTOH, CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419 removes support for the related relocations from the kernel, hence the error you are seeing. Modifying arch/arm64/Makefile in the kernel sources to have: ifeq ($(CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_843419), y) KBUILD_CFLAGS_MODULE+= -mcmodel=large -mpc-relative-literal-loads endif makes the problem disappear. However, the -mpc-relative-literal-loads option is not recognized by GCC if it doesn't include the patch for GCC PR 63304, so it may not be easy to patch the Makefile. ** Bug watch added: GCC Bugzilla #63304 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
I've cross compiled the kernel+modules, mostly following the steps in comment #18. Then, I've scanned the generated module for the AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 relocation. When compiled with Linaro-2015.12, this relocation is present. When compiled with Linaro-2015.10, it is not. When using Linaro-2015.11, the build fails with errors such as: Assembler messages: Error: selected processor does not support `aese v0.16b,v1.16b' Assuming that these relocations are the real cause of the problem, I'm going to bisect to identify which commit in our branch introduced them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
That's what I expected: this has nothing to do with relocations. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1533009] Re: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation"
It's not clear to me how I can reproduce the problem as a GCC developper. Should I build kernel-4.3.0 (vanilla), using the defconfig attached on comment #13, build the modules and look for the relocation mentioned by Ard Biesheuvel? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1533009 Title: arm64: "unsupported RELA relocation" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1533009/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1429894]
How is your GCC configured? I've just rebuilt our 4.8 branch for arm-none-linux-gnueabihf and I cannot reproduce the ICE you are seeing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1429894 Title: gcc-4.8: internal compiler error: in dwarf2out_frame_debug_adjust_cfa, at dwarf2cfi.c:1078 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1429894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1353729]
Committed in upstream trunk as rev 217076. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1353729 Title: [4.9 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2952 (aarch64 -linux-gnu) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro/+bug/1353729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1353729]
Patch posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02209.html waiting for further review. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1353729 Title: [4.9 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2952 (aarch64 -linux-gnu) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linaro/+bug/1353729/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1091823] Re: libgcc2.c includes limits.h without need
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1091823 Title: libgcc2.c includes limits.h without need To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1091823/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1096619] Re: libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.7 missing some symbols for arm-linux-gnueabi
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096619 Title: libstdc++6 built from gcc-4.7 missing some symbols for arm-linux- gnueabi To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1096619/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132012] Re: [4.8 regression] ICE in expand_asm_operands, at stmt.c:910
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132012 Title: [4.8 regression] ICE in expand_asm_operands, at stmt.c:910 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1132012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1176255] Re: linux-mako fails to boot when built with gcc 4.8
Is the problem still present with 2014.08 releases of gcc-linaro 4.8 and 4.9? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1176255 Title: linux-mako fails to boot when built with gcc 4.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1176255/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1181046] Re: linux-manta keeps rebooting when built with gcc 4.7 or 4.8
Is the problem still present with recent 2014-08 released of gcc-linaro 4.8 and 4.9? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181046 Title: linux-manta keeps rebooting when built with gcc 4.7 or 4.8 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1181046/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1194123] Re: [gcc-linaro wrong-code regression] gcc 4.8.1-2ubuntu1 to 4.8.1-3ubuntu1 breaks gtk on armhf
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194123 Title: [gcc-linaro wrong-code regression] gcc 4.8.1-2ubuntu1 to 4.8.1-3ubuntu1 breaks gtk on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1194123/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1194501] Re: [ 4.8 Linaro regression] ICE on gcc-4.8 building kde4libs
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194501 Title: [ 4.8 Linaro regression] ICE on gcc-4.8 building kde4libs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1194501/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1267761] Re: miscompilation of unsigned comparison on aarch64
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1267761 Title: miscompilation of unsigned comparison on aarch64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1267761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1351227]
Looks similar to bug #373 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 373 *** -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1351227 Title: libwebp ftbfs on arm64 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1351227/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1296601] Re: ICE in push_minipool_fix when building rtl8723ae kernel driver
** Also affects: gcc via http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49423 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296601 Title: ICE in push_minipool_fix when building rtl8723ae kernel driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1296601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251930] Re: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Charles Baylis (cbaylis) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251930 Title: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1251930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1295653] Re: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242
** Changed in: gcc Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: gcc Status: Fix Released => Unknown ** Changed in: gcc Remote watch: None => GCC Bugzilla #60609 ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Charles Baylis (cbaylis) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295653 Title: [4.8/4.9 Regression] Error: value of 256 too large for field of 1 bytes at 68242 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1295653/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1263576] Re: coinor-osi fails to build from source on arm64 (but did succeed before)
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263576 Title: coinor-osi fails to build from source on arm64 (but did succeed before) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1263576/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1296601] Re: ICE in push_minipool_fix when building rtl8723ae kernel driver
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Charles Baylis (cbaylis) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296601 Title: ICE in push_minipool_fix when building rtl8723ae kernel driver To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1296601/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232872] Re: NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04
Hi, After upgrading to 13.10, I had to apply the same "fix" again. I am still not convinced this is the right way of fixing the problem, since LibreOffice should use locks when accessing files over NFS. I guess the question is more to understand who is guilty? - my NAS server (Synology) - my Ubuntu install Apart from making sure lockd is running on my client Ubuntu machine, is there anything else I should do? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232872 Title: NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1232872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243022] Re: function with stack arrays corrupts saved registers on stack
Backport to gcc-linaro-4.8 as rev SVN 240570 (bzr mirror 122136). Part of gcc-linaro-4.8-2013.11 release. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243022 Title: function with stack arrays corrupts saved registers on stack To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243022/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1251930] Re: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Charles Baylis (cbaylis) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1251930 Title: [4.8 regression] internal compiler error while compiling OpenCV 2.4.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1251930/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
Committed revert of 197526 as 204671, so that the tests pass with our next release. More time needed to actually fix the original patch, and to look more carefully at tar's code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
Reverting commit 197526 makes the test pass. Now investigating the code generation differences to see if that patch can be fixed or if it should be reverted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
Checking intermediate revisions between 2013.04 and 2013.05 indicate that the regression was introduced by commit 122016, which is the backport of trunk r197518-197522,197526-197528 (which means 8 patches). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
OK with gcc-linaro-4.8-2013.04 FAILS with gcc-linaro-4.8-2013.05 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1243656] Re: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro
Do you know if it fails on armhf only or on other targets? (arm, x86) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1243656 Title: [regression] tar testsuite failure seen when built with gcc-4.8 Linaro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1243656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1229170] Re: [regression] aarch64 bootstrap broken
Patch applied to gcc-linaro-4.7 branch, rev 115086. ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Christophe Lyon (christophe-lyon) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1229170 Title: [regression] aarch64 bootstrap broken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1229170/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234060] Re: Wrong code generation for -march=armv7-a -thumb (Found during GMP bulild)
According to Kugan, seems to be fixed by commit 201250 on trunk, which I have just backported in linaro-4.8 branch as 203139. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234060 Title: Wrong code generation for -march=armv7-a -thumb (Found during GMP bulild) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1234060/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232017] Re: [regression] mpfr tasinh test doesn't terminate when built with Linaro GCC 4.8 on armhf
Fixed in linaro-4.8 branch as 203137,203138. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232017 Title: [regression] mpfr tasinh test doesn't terminate when built with Linaro GCC 4.8 on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc/+bug/1232017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232872] [NEW] NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04
Public bug reported: Hi all, I have a problem very similar to what is exposed in question #234375. Since I upgraded to Ubuntu 13.04 (host x86_64), I have trouble accessing documents via NFS with LibreOffice. The slash screen display for about 30s, then there is a popup warning saying that another user has opened the file, and offering to open a copy, open as readonly or cancel. The point is, no other user has opened that file (being the only user on my personal PC, but storing my documents on NAS). So I tried the suggestion about adding "noauto" in /etc/fstab and changing /etc/rc.local, with no luck. But the modification of /usr/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice: ## # STAR_PROFILE_LOCKING_DISABLED=1 export STAR_PROFILE_LOCKING_DISABLED # # file locking now enabled by default #SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1 # <<- if set to 0 ; same trouble ... #export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING ### (That is, uncomment the first 2 lines, and commenting the other 2) This works OK. If this is the official way of fixing things, then I guess LibreOffice deserves an update on Ubuntu at least. Thanks. ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232872 Title: NFS / lock problem with LibreOffice wth 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1232872/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1232017] Re: [regression] mpfr tasinh test doesn't terminate when built with Linaro GCC 4.8 on armhf
** Changed in: gcc-linaro Assignee: (unassigned) => Kugan Vivekanandarajah (kugan-vivekanandarajah) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1232017 Title: [regression] mpfr tasinh test doesn't terminate when built with Linaro GCC 4.8 on armhf To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gcc-linaro/+bug/1232017/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
