[Bug 1904730] Re: neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port

2022-06-06 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package pyroute2 - 0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1~cloud0
---

 pyroute2 (0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1~cloud0) xenial-queens; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 pyroute2 (0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1) bionic; urgency=medium
 .
   * Increase default recv-buf size (LP: #1904730)
 - d/p/increase-recvbuf-size.patch: increase recvbuf size
   from 16k to 32k.


** Changed in: cloud-archive/queens
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904730

Title:
  neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1904730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904730] Update Released

2022-06-06 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pyroute2 has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904730

Title:
  neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1904730/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975634] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-06-01 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of 
our users have access to these improvements.
  
  The update contains the following package updates:
  
+* cinder 19.1.0
     * neutron 19.3.0
     * manila 13.0.3
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
  Waiting for the following before moving forward: 
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/842971

** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of 
our users have access to these improvements.
  
  The update contains the following package updates:
  
-* cinder 19.1.0
+    * cinder 19.1.0
     * neutron 19.3.0
     * manila 13.0.3
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
- Waiting for the following before moving forward: 
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/842971
+ I've added cinder to this SRU after neutron and manila were accepted.

** No longer affects: cinder (Ubuntu)

** No longer affects: cinder (Ubuntu Impish)

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of 
our users have access to these improvements.
  
  The update contains the following package updates:
  
     * cinder 19.1.0
     * neutron 19.3.0
     * manila 13.0.3
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
- I've added cinder to this SRU after neutron and manila were accepted.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975634

Title:
   [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965297] Please test proposed package

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Edward, or anyone else affected,

Accepted neutron into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965297

Title:
  l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1965297/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Please test proposed package

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted manila into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Please test proposed package

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted manila into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975634] Please test proposed package

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted neutron into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975634

Title:
   [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975634] Please test proposed package

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted manila into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975634

Title:
   [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965297] Re: l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965297

Title:
  l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1965297/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-05-31 Thread Corey Bryant
I've uploaded a new cinder 2:19.1.0-0ubuntu1 to the impish unapproved
queue with a changes file that includes 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4. That should
allow us to move forward and have both updates in impish-proposed for
testing.

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Confirmed => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976101] Re: py310 failure - AssertionError: Lists differ: ['[extra]'] != ['extra']

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: stevedore (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: castellan

** Also affects: python-stevedore
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976101

Title:
  py310 failure - AssertionError: Lists differ: ['[extra]'] != ['extra']

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-stevedore/+bug/1976101/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976106] Re: [SRU] FTBFS logging_user_identity_format's default is using deprecated (now removed) tenant

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

- python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1].
- 4.0.0 likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-
- oslo.log fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen here:
- https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-
- rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
+ [Impact]
+ python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ The only regression potential that I see is for users who are already on 
Jammy and using the new python3-oslo.context with the existing python-oslo.log 
4.6.1-0ubuntu1 as oslo.context has removed the (long deprecated) tenant 
argument. After this new version of python-oslo.log is avaialble, that 
regression goes away.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
- The only regression potential that I see is for users who are already on 
Jammy and using the new python3-oslo.context with the existing python-oslo.log 
4.6.1-0ubuntu1 as oslo.context has removed the (long deprecated) tenant 
argument. After this new version of python-oslo.log is avaialble, that 
regression goes away.
+ This is fixing a regression in Jammy. If the version of python3-oslo.context 
in Jammy is used with the existing python-oslo.log (4.6.1-0ubuntu1), 
logging_user_identity_format's default will cause a failure as oslo.context has 
removed the (long deprecated) tenant argument. After this new version of 
python-oslo.log is available, that regression goes away.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
- This is fixing a regression in Jammy. If the version of python3-oslo.context 
in Jammy is used with the existing python-oslo.log (4.6.1-0ubuntu1), 
logging_user_identity_format's default will cause a failure as oslo.context has 
removed the (long deprecated) tenant argument. After this new version of 
python-oslo.log is available, that regression goes away.
+ This is fixing a regression in Jammy. If the version of python3-oslo.context 
in Jammy is used with the existing python-oslo.log (4.6.1-0ubuntu1), 
logging_user_identity_format's default will cause a failure as oslo.context has 
removed the (long deprecated) tenant argument. After this new version of 
python-oslo.log is available, the regression will be fixed.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
+ python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-oslo.log. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This is fixing a regression in Jammy. If the version of python3-oslo.context 
in Jammy is used with the existing python-oslo.log (4.6.1-0ubuntu1), 
logging_user_identity_format's default will cause a failure as oslo.context has 
removed the (long deprecated) tenant argument. After this new version of 
python-oslo.log is available, the regression will be fixed.

** Also affects: python-oslo.log (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-oslo.log (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: python-oslo.log (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: python-oslo.log (Ubuntu)
   Status: New 

[Bug 1976102] Re: [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy Remove the deprecated argument tenant from 
RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
+ python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy after python-castellan. Remove the deprecated argument 
tenant from RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as 
seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This is a doc and unit test only update, so there is not much concern with 
regression.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy after python-castellan. Remove the deprecated argument 
tenant from RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as 
seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
+ python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy after python-castellan. Now python-castellan fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This is a doc and unit test only update, so there is not much concern with 
regression.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976102

Title:
  [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-castellan/+bug/1976102/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976106] [NEW] [SRU] FTBFS logging_user_identity_format's default is using deprecated (now removed) tenant

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy  after python-castellan. Now python-oslo.log fails on 
Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938

[Test Case]
A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.

[Regression Potential]
The only regression potential that I see is for users who are already on Jammy 
and using the new python3-oslo.context with the existing python-oslo.log 
4.6.1-0ubuntu1 as oslo.context has removed the (long deprecated) tenant 
argument. After this new version of python-oslo.log is avaialble, that 
regression goes away.

** Affects: python-oslo.log (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Summary changed:

- logging_user_identity_format's default is using deprecated (now removed) 
tenant
+ [SRU] FTBFS logging_user_identity_format's default is using deprecated (now 
removed) tenant

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976106

Title:
  [SRU] FTBFS logging_user_identity_format's default is using deprecated
  (now removed) tenant

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-oslo.log/+bug/1976106/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976102] Re: [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Tags added: block-proposed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976102

Title:
  [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-castellan/+bug/1976102/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976102] [NEW] [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy Remove the deprecated argument tenant from 
RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html

[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938

[Test Case]
A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.

[Regression Potential]
This is a doc and unit test only update, so there is not much concern with 
regression.

** Affects: python-castellan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Fix Released

** Affects: python-castellan (Ubuntu Jammy)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: Triaged

** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
  python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1].
  4.0.0 likely landed in Jammy Remove the deprecated argument tenant from
  RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen
  here: https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-
  rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ This is a doc and unit test only update, so there is not much concern with 
regression.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- 
- python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1].
- 4.0.0 likely landed in Jammy Remove the deprecated argument tenant from
- RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen
- here: https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-
- rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
+ python-oslo.context removed a deprecated tenant argument in 4.0.0 [1]. 4.0.0 
likely landed in Jammy Remove the deprecated argument tenant from 
RequestContext. Now python-castellan fails on Jammy rebuilds as seen here: 
https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220506-jammy-jammy.html
  
  [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.context/+/815938
  
  [Test Case]
  A successful build of the python-oslo.context package will verify this fix.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This is a doc and unit test only update, so there is not much concern with 
regression.

** Also affects: python-castellan (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-castellan (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: python-castellan (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: python-castellan (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976102

Title:
  [SRU] Fix FTBFS for jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-castellan/+bug/1976102/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965297] Re: l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: cloud-archive/victoria
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: In Progress => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: New => Triaged

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965297

Title:
  l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1965297/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965297] Re: l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

2022-05-27 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/zed
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/yoga
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965297

Title:
  l3ha don't set backup qg ports down

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1965297/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975594] Re: OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

2022-05-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
+ 
+ Specifically the following bugs require fixes:
+ LP#1914394
+ LP#1946588
+ LP#1951872
+ LP#1961013
+ LP#1965819
+ LP#1927077
+ LP#1953295
+ LP#1928031
+ LP#1952550
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
  All of these patches have already landed in the upstream stable/ussuri branch.
  All of these patches have also been included in later stable releases of 
neutron in Ubuntu. The last of these patches are included via the following 
point releases:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975632
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975636

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
  
  Specifically the following bugs require fixes:
- LP#1914394
- LP#1946588
- LP#1951872
- LP#1961013
- LP#1965819
- LP#1927077
- LP#1953295
- LP#1928031
- LP#1952550
+ LP #1914394
+ LP #1946588
+ LP #1951872
+ LP #1961013
+ LP #1965819
+ LP #1927077
+ LP #1953295
+ LP #1928031
+ LP: #1952550
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
  All of these patches have already landed in the upstream stable/ussuri branch.
  All of these patches have also been included in later stable releases of 
neutron in Ubuntu. The last of these patches are included via the following 
point releases:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975632
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975636

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
  
  Specifically the following bugs require fixes:
- LP #1914394
- LP #1946588
- LP #1951872
- LP #1961013
- LP #1965819
- LP #1927077
- LP #1953295
- LP #1928031
+ LP: #1914394
+ LP: #1946588
+ LP: #1951872
+ LP: #1961013
+ LP: #1965819
+ LP: #1927077
+ LP: #1953295
+ LP: #1928031
  LP: #1952550
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
  All of these patches have already landed in the upstream stable/ussuri branch.
  All of these patches have also been included in later stable releases of 
neutron in 

[Bug 1975594] Re: OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

2022-05-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
+ All of these patches have been included in later stable releases of neutron 
already. The last of these patches are included via the following point 
releases:
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975632
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975636

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
  In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
  will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
  in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
  before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
  The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
  the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
  ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]
- All of these patches have been included in later stable releases of neutron 
already. The last of these patches are included via the following point 
releases:
+ All of these patches have already landed in the upstream stable/ussuri branch.
+ All of these patches have also been included in later stable releases of 
neutron in Ubuntu. The last of these patches are included via the following 
point releases:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975632
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975636

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975594

Title:
  OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975594/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975594] Re: OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

2022-05-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

- The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance
- mode which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any
- new stable releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a
- series of OVN patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri
- (Focal).
+ [Impact]
+ The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance mode 
which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any new stable 
releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a series of OVN 
patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri (Focal).
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ The following SRU process was followed:
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
+ 
+ In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
+ will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
+ in -proposed. A successful run of all available tests will be required
+ before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
+ 
+ The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
+ the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
+ ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
+ aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
+ 
+ [Discussion]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975594

Title:
  OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975594/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975600] Re: [MIR] jaraco.context

2022-05-26 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

- TBC
+ [Availability]
+ Currently in universe
+ 
+ [Rationale]
+ python3-jaraco.text has a new dependency on python3-jaraco.context.
+ 
+ Reverse-depends chain from the ceph packages that depend on this:
+ ceph-mgr/ceph-mgr-cephadm/ceph-mgr-dashboard <- python3-cherrypy3 <- 
python3-jaraco.collections <- python3-jaraco.text <- python3-jarico.context
+ 
+ [Security]
+ No security history
+ 
+ [Quality Assurance]
+ Package works out of the box with no prompting. There are no major bugs in 
Ubuntu and there are no major bugs in Debian. Unit tests are run during build.
+ 
+ [Dependencies]
+ All are in main
+ 
+ [Standards Compliance]
+ FHS and Debian Policy compliant
+ 
+ [Maintenance]
+ Simple python package that the OpenStack Team will take care of
+ 
+ [Background]
+ Provides various context managers extending functionality of Python's 
contextlib.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975600

Title:
  [MIR] jaraco.context

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jaraco.context/+bug/1975600/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975594] Re: OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

2022-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975594

Title:
  OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975594/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975632] Re: [SRU] Yoga stable releases

2022-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: cloud-archive/yoga
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975632

Title:
   [SRU] Yoga stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975632/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975634] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975634

Title:
   [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1975634/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975594] [NEW] OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

2022-05-24 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

The upstream Neutron stable/ussuri branch is in extended-maintenance
mode which means patches are still accepted but they aren't cutting any
new stable releases. Therefore this bug is being opened to backport a
series of OVN patches that are needed for functionality on Ussuri
(Focal).

** Affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975594

Title:
  OVN backports for Neutron Ussuri

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1975594/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Re: [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Manila has been approved and added to
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates.

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Diko, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does
not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change
the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your
testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Diko, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into victoria-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:victoria-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-victoria-needed to verification-victoria-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-victoria-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-victoria-needed

** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Diko, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-wallaby-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Diko, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted neutron into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Please test proposed package

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Felipe, or anyone else affected,

Accepted horizon into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930446] Re: Wallaby ceilometer.compute.discovery fails to get domain metadata

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: ceilometer (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: ceilometer (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930446

Title:
  Wallaby ceilometer.compute.discovery fails to get domain metadata

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1930446/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930446] Re: Wallaby ceilometer.compute.discovery fails to get domain metadata

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: ceilometer (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930446

Title:
  Wallaby ceilometer.compute.discovery fails to get domain metadata

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ceilometer/+bug/1930446/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Re: Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package horizon - 4:18.6.3-0ubuntu1~cloud1
---

 horizon (4:18.6.3-0ubuntu1~cloud1) focal-victoria; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/0001-Fix-for-Resize-instance-button.patch: Fixes resize instance
 widget (LP: #1940834).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Update Released

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Re: Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package horizon - 4:19.2.0-0ubuntu1~cloud1
---

 horizon (4:19.2.0-0ubuntu1~cloud1) focal-wallaby; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Corey Bryant ]
   * d/gbp.conf: Create stable/wallaby branch.
 .
   [ Hemanth Nakkina ]
   * d/p/0001-Fix-for-Resize-instance-button.patch: Fixes resize instance
 widget (LP: #1940834).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Update Released

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Re: Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package horizon - 4:20.1.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0
---

 horizon (4:20.1.1-0ubuntu2~cloud0) focal-xena; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 horizon (4:20.1.1-0ubuntu2) impish; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/0001-Fix-for-Resize-instance-button.patch: Fixes resize instance
 widget (LP: #1940834).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Update Released

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Re: [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
I've just uploaded a new manila 1:13.0.2-0ubuntu1 to the impish
unapproved queue to include LP:1952763 in its changes file. More details
are at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila-
ganesha/+bug/1952763/comments/25

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Brian, I've just uploaded a new manila 1:13.0.2-0ubuntu1 to the impish
unapproved queue that includes this bug in its changes file. If it is ok
with the SRU team, we'd like to carry both of the outstanding SRUs for
manila in impish-proposed. With impish EOL in July, we are ok with
carrying these in proposed until then.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902338] Re: package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
I've dropped debconf support from manila in kinetic 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu2.

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902338

Title:
  package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1902338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Re: [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Hi Brian,

I've done some work to get openstack regression testing coverage,
specifically: https://github.com/openstack-charmers/charmed-openstack-
tester/commit/bcc923acefc67f09e0dccc852fc020abed359ac9

Also, and not a requirement, but I've submitted for main inclusion of
manila: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1975493

Thanks,
Corey

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1975493] [NEW] [MIR] manila

2022-05-23 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

[Availability]
Currently in universe

[Rationale]
Manila is an OpenStack project that we're ready to support in main.

[Security]
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-6519
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-27781
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-9543

[Quality Assurance]
Package works out of the box with no prompting. There are no major bugs in 
Ubuntu and there are no major bugs in Debian. Unit tests are run during build.

[Dependencies]
All are in main (see version 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu2 in kinetic)

[Standards Compliance]
FHS and Debian Policy compliant

[Maintenance]
Python package that the OpenStack Team will take care of

[Background]
Manila is an OpenStack project that provides Shared Filesystems as a service. 
It provides coordinated access to shared or distributed file systems. While the 
primary consumption of file shares would be across OpenStack Compute instances, 
the service is also intended to be accessible as an independent capability in 
line with the modular design established by other OpenStack services. Manila is 
extensible for multiple backends (to support vendor or file system specific 
nuances / capabilities) and accommodates any of a variety of shared or 
distributed file system types.

** Affects: manila (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Availability]
  Currently in universe
  
  [Rationale]
  Manila is an OpenStack project that we're ready to support in main.
  
  [Security]
  https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2016-6519
  https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-27781
  https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2020-9543
  
  [Quality Assurance]
  Package works out of the box with no prompting. There are no major bugs in 
Ubuntu and there are no major bugs in Debian. Unit tests are run during build.
  
  [Dependencies]
  All are in main (see version 1:14.0.0-0ubuntu2 in kinetic)
  
  [Standards Compliance]
  FHS and Debian Policy compliant
  
  [Maintenance]
  Python package that the OpenStack Team will take care of
  
  [Background]
- Manila is an OpenStack project that provides Shared Filesystems as a service.
- It provides coordinated access to shared or distributed file systems. While
- the primary consumption of file shares would be across OpenStack Compute
- instances, the service is also intended to be accessible as an independent
- capability in line with the modular design established by other OpenStack
- services. Manila is extensible for multiple backends (to support vendor or
- file system specific nuances / capabilities) and accommodates any of a
- variety of shared or distributed file system types.
+ Manila is an OpenStack project that provides Shared Filesystems as a service. 
It provides coordinated access to shared or distributed file systems. While the 
primary consumption of file shares would be across OpenStack Compute instances, 
the service is also intended to be accessible as an independent capability in 
line with the modular design established by other OpenStack services. Manila is 
extensible for multiple backends (to support vendor or file system specific 
nuances / capabilities) and accommodates any of a variety of shared or 
distributed file system types.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1975493

Title:
  [MIR] manila

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1975493/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902338] Re: package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-05-20 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Hiten,

Thank you for reporting this bug. It looks like you're hitting debconf
questions, which were inherited from Debian. I plan to drop those soon.

As a work-around you should be able to turn off deconf questions
(noninteractive) with 'dpkg-reconfigure debconf'.

Thank you,
Corey

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902338

Title:
  package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1902338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1902338] Re: package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2022-05-20 Thread Corey Bryant
Additional details from DpkgTerminalLog.txt:

Registering service and endpoints for manila with type share at 
http://172.16.21.40:8786/v1/$(tenant_id)s
Failed to discover available identity versions when contacting 
http://127.0.0.1:35357/v3/. Attempting to parse version from URL.
Unable to establish connection to http://127.0.0.1:35357/v3/auth/tokens: 
HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=35357): Max retries exceeded with 
url: /v3/auth/tokens (Caused by 
NewConnectionError(': Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection 
refused',))
Warning - data is empty
Failed to discover available identity versions when contacting 
http://127.0.0.1:35357/v3/. Attempting to parse version from URL.
Unable to establish connection to http://127.0.0.1:35357/v3/auth/tokens: 
HTTPConnectionPool(host='127.0.0.1', port=35357): Max retries exceeded with 
url: /v3/auth/tokens (Caused by 
NewConnectionError(': Failed to establish a new connection: [Errno 111] Connection 
refused',))
dpkg: error processing package manila-api (--configure):
 installed manila-api package post-installation script subprocess returned 
error exit status 1

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1902338

Title:
  package manila-api 1:10.0.0-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~cloud0 failed to
  install/upgrade: installed manila-api package post-installation script
  subprocess returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1902338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1907494] Re: base64 encodestring is deprecated and removed in python 3.9

2022-05-20 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1907494

Title:
  base64 encodestring is deprecated and removed in python 3.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/manila/+bug/1907494/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Please test proposed package

2022-05-18 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Diko, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nova into yoga-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:yoga-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-yoga-needed to verification-yoga-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-yoga-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-yoga-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Re: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

2022-05-16 Thread Corey Bryant
Thank you Felipe and Rodrigo for this fix. It's been uploaded to focal,
impish, jammy unapproved queues, and victoria/wallaby staging for the
cloud archive.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904580

Title:
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-nova-compute/+bug/1904580/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1904580] Re: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

2022-05-16 Thread Corey Bryant
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
  Charm revision: 320
  Cloud: bionic-ussuri
  
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open.
  Load key "/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa": bad permissions
  nova@10.35.80.49: Permission denied (publickey).
  
  This was preventing nova resizing:
  
  /var/log/nova/nova-compute.log:2020-11-17 13:14:42.210 100221 ERROR
  oslo_messaging.rpc.server Command: ssh -o BatchMode=yes 10.35.80.49
  mkdir -p /var/lib/nova/instances/39caee98-b81c-4cef-9810-815f2ecf1fc4
  
  Manually setting to 0600 fixed the issue.
+ 
+ Note (coreycb): It's important to note that /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ and
+ files contained in that directory are not created by the package.
+ Therefore the package should avoid changing permissions for this
+ directory.
+ 
+ [Test Case]
+ Install a previous version of the nova-common package.
+ Setup ssh as described here (at least the creation of /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ 
files and chmod accordingly.
+ Upgrade to the patched version of nova-common and confirm the 
/var/lib/nova/.ssh/ directory/file modes haven't changed.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ This is actually fixing a regression that was introduced to the package when 
we introduced the postinst code that does a blanket chmod to all of 
/var/lib/nova/. Assuming the test case above passes, I can't see any way for 
this to cause a regression.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Charm revision: 320
  Cloud: bionic-ussuri
  
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open.
  Load key "/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa": bad permissions
  nova@10.35.80.49: Permission denied (publickey).
  
  This was preventing nova resizing:
  
  /var/log/nova/nova-compute.log:2020-11-17 13:14:42.210 100221 ERROR
  oslo_messaging.rpc.server Command: ssh -o BatchMode=yes 10.35.80.49
  mkdir -p /var/lib/nova/instances/39caee98-b81c-4cef-9810-815f2ecf1fc4
  
  Manually setting to 0600 fixed the issue.
  
  Note (coreycb): It's important to note that /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ and
  files contained in that directory are not created by the package.
  Therefore the package should avoid changing permissions for this
  directory.
  
  [Test Case]
  Install a previous version of the nova-common package.
  Setup ssh as described here (at least the creation of /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ 
files and chmod accordingly.
  Upgrade to the patched version of nova-common and confirm the 
/var/lib/nova/.ssh/ directory/file modes haven't changed.
  
  [Regression Potential]
- This is actually fixing a regression that was introduced to the package when 
we introduced the postinst code that does a blanket chmod to all of 
/var/lib/nova/. Assuming the test case above passes, I can't see any way for 
this to cause a regression.
+ This is actually fixing a regression that was introduced to the package when 
we introduced the postinst code that does a blanket chmod to all of 
/var/lib/nova/. Assuming the test case above passes, I can't see any way for 
this to cause another regression.

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  Charm revision: 320
  Cloud: bionic-ussuri
  
  Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open.
  Load key "/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa": bad permissions
  nova@10.35.80.49: Permission denied (publickey).
  
  This was preventing nova resizing:
  
  /var/log/nova/nova-compute.log:2020-11-17 13:14:42.210 100221 ERROR
  oslo_messaging.rpc.server Command: ssh -o BatchMode=yes 10.35.80.49
  mkdir -p /var/lib/nova/instances/39caee98-b81c-4cef-9810-815f2ecf1fc4
  
  Manually setting to 0600 fixed the issue.
  
  Note (coreycb): It's important to note that /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ and
  files contained in that directory are not created by the package.
  Therefore the package should avoid changing permissions for this
  directory.
  
  [Test Case]
  Install a previous version of the nova-common package.
- Setup ssh as described here (at least the creation of /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ 
files and chmod accordingly.
+ Setup ssh as described here (at least the creation of /var/lib/nova/.ssh/ 
files and chmod accordingly): 
https://docs.openstack.org/nova/pike/admin/ssh-configuration.html
  Upgrade to the patched version of nova-common and confirm the 
/var/lib/nova/.ssh/ directory/file modes haven't changed.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  This is actually fixing a regression that was introduced to the package when 
we introduced the postinst code that does a blanket chmod to all of 
/var/lib/nova/. Assuming the test case above passes, I can't see any way for 
this to cause another regression.

** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Kinetic)
   Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Rodrigo Barbieri (rodrigo-barbieri2010)
   Status: Triaged

** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: nova (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: New => Triaged

** 

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package manila - 1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2~cloud0
---

 manila (1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2~cloud0) focal-xena; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 manila (1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2) impish; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Corey Bryant ]
   * d/gbp.conf: Create stable/xena branch.
   * d/rules: Drop generation of policy.json in favor of policy-in-code
 (LP: #1952763).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Update Released

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for manila has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
focal-xena/proposed verified successfully:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila-ganesha/+/841328

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Please test proposed package

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello lmercl, or anyone else affected,

Accepted horizon into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Please test proposed package

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello lmercl, or anyone else affected,

Accepted horizon into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-wallaby-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Please test proposed package

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello lmercl, or anyone else affected,

Accepted horizon into victoria-proposed. The package will build now and
be available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:victoria-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-victoria-needed to verification-victoria-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-victoria-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-victoria-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952763] Re: [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive/yoga
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952763

Title:
  [SRU] manilaclient.common.apiclient.exceptions.Forbidden: Access was
  denied to this resource. (HTTP 403)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1952763/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962582] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package horizon - 4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0
---

 horizon (4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1~cloud0) focal-xena; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 horizon (4:20.1.1-0ubuntu1) impish; urgency=medium
 .
   [ Corey Bryant ]
   * d/gbp.conf: Create stable/xena branch.
 .
   [ Felipe Reyes ]
   * New stable point release for OpenStack Xena (LP: #1962582).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962582

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1962582/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962582] Update Released

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962582

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1962582/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Re: TypeError when computing QOS feature name

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package cinder - 2:18.1.0-0ubuntu1~cloud2
---

 cinder (2:18.1.0-0ubuntu1~cloud2) focal-wallaby; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/fix-qos-computation.patch: Cherry-pick from upstream review to
 fix TypeError exception when generating QOS feature name (LP: #1948507).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Update Released

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cinder has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Re: TypeError when computing QOS feature name

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package cinder - 2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4~cloud0
---

 cinder (2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4~cloud0) focal-xena; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 cinder (2:19.0.0-0ubuntu4) impish; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/p/fix-qos-computation.patch: Cherry-pick from upstream review to
 fix TypeError exception when generating QOS feature name (LP: #1948507).


** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Update Released

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cinder has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Re: TypeError when computing QOS feature name

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
focal-xena and focal-wallaby are both successful in the charm-cinder-
netapp gate when running with proposed:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-cinder-netapp/+/833770

** Tags removed: verification-wallaby-needed verification-xena-needed
** Tags added: verification-wallaby-done verification-xena-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958863] Re: [SRU] neutron-l3-agent attempts to use non-existing --config-file=/etc/neutron/fwaas_driver.ini

2022-05-10 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958863

Title:
  [SRU] neutron-l3-agent attempts to use non-existing --config-
  file=/etc/neutron/fwaas_driver.ini

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1958863/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-05-09 Thread Corey Bryant
Thanks Felipe. These branches have all been merged, pushed and uploaded
to the impish unapproved queue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1972665] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-05-09 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: cinder
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: cinder

** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: horizon (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972665

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1972665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971960] Re: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x

2022-05-06 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug is going to need SRU details outlined and then the ubuntu-sru
team will need to be subscribed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971960

Title:
  [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/+bug/1971960/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971960] Re: [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x

2022-05-06 Thread Corey Bryant
A fixed version of python-xmlsec has been uploaded to the jammy
unapproved queue:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+queue?queue_state=1_text=

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971960

Title:
  [FTBFS] python-xmlsec fails to build on s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-xmlsec/+bug/1971960/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970244] Re: [SRU] Enable support for Zed Cloud Archive

2022-05-05 Thread Corey Bryant
This has been successfully verified.

root@j1:~# apt policy software-properties-common
software-properties-common:
  Installed: 0.99.22.1
  Candidate: 0.99.22.1
  Version table:
 *** 0.99.22.1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 0.99.22 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
root@j1:~# apt policy keystone-common

root@j1:~# sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed-proposed --yes
...

root@j1:~# sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed --yes
...

root@j1:~# sudo apt install keystone-common --yes
...

root@j1:~# apt policy keystone-common
keystone-common:
  Installed: 2:21.0.0+git2022050409.884f88148-0ubuntu1~cloud0
  Candidate: 2:21.0.0+git2022050409.884f88148-0ubuntu1~cloud0
  Version table:
 *** 2:21.0.0+git2022050409.884f88148-0ubuntu1~cloud0 500
500 http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu 
jammy-proposed/zed/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ubuntu-cloud.archive.canonical.com/ubuntu 
jammy-updates/zed/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2:21.0.0-0ubuntu1 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970244

Title:
  [SRU] Enable support for Zed Cloud Archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1970244/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962582] Re: [SRU] Xena stable releases

2022-04-27 Thread Corey Bryant
I've manually verified horizon 20.1.1 on xena-proposed and have also run
regression successfully.

==
Totals
==
Ran: 99 tests in 1384.8597 sec.
 - Passed: 89
 - Skipped: 9
 - Expected Fail: 0
 - Unexpected Success: 0
 - Failed: 1
Sum of execute time for each test: 520.1634 sec.

** Tags removed: verification-xena-needed
** Tags added: verification-xena-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962582

Title:
  [SRU] Xena stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1962582/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970244] [NEW] [SRU] Enable support for Zed Cloud Archive

2022-04-25 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

Please add support for:

   cloud-archive:zed
   cloud-archive:zed-proposed

This will also need to be SRU'd back to jammy.

[Impact]
End users have to manually enable the zed cloud archive pockets.

[Test case]
sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed
sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed-proposed

[Regression potential]
Limited - just a data item addition

** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Please add support for:
  
-cloud-archive:zed
-cloud-archive:zed-proposed
+    cloud-archive:zed
+    cloud-archive:zed-proposed
  
- This will also need to be SRU'd back to focal.
+ This will also need to be SRU'd back to jammy.
  
  [Impact]
- End users have to manually enable the yoga cloud archive pockets.
+ End users have to manually enable the zed cloud archive pockets.
  
  [Test case]
  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed
  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:zed-proposed
  
  [Regression potential]
  Limited - just a data item addition

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970244

Title:
  [SRU] Enable support for Zed Cloud Archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1970244/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891238] Re: [RM] neutron-fwaas, vmware-nsx

2022-04-19 Thread Corey Bryant
Steve, let's remove vmware-nsx as well.

** Summary changed:

- [RM] neutron-fwaas
+ [RM] neutron-fwaas, vmware-nsx

** Changed in: vmware-nsx (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891238

Title:
  [RM] neutron-fwaas, vmware-nsx

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/networking-odl/+bug/1891238/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960319] Re: Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

2022-04-08 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package neutron - 2:20.0.0-0ubuntu3~cloud0
---

 neutron (2:20.0.0-0ubuntu3~cloud0) focal-yoga; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 neutron (2:20.0.0-0ubuntu3) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/control: Add openvswitch-common dependency to neutron-server
 binary package (LP: #1960319).


** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960319

Title:
  Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1960319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960319] Re: Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

2022-04-08 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960319

Title:
  Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1960319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960319] Re: Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

2022-04-07 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960319

Title:
  Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1960319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Re: [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-04-07 Thread Corey Bryant
The manila-ganesha charm is testing with wallaby-proposed in bundles for now to 
pick up this fix:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/charm-manila-ganesha/+/833896

** Also affects: charm-manila-ganesha
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: charm-manila-ganesha
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: charm-manila-ganesha
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960319] Re: Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

2022-04-07 Thread Corey Bryant
I think I've hit this in a different code-path (see traceback below),
but the same solution is required (neutron-common needs openvswitch-
common).

This change introduced the new call to ovsdb-client:
https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/neutron/+/822299


2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource Traceback (most 
recent call last):
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/tenacity/__init__.py", line 426, in __call__
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource result = 
fn(*args, **kwargs)
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/ovn/mech_driver/ovsdb/ovn_client.py",
 line 1644, in delete_mac_binding_entries_by_mac
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource return 
processutils.execute(*cmd,
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/oslo_concurrency/processutils.py", line 395, in 
execute
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource obj = 
subprocess.Popen(cmd,
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/eventlet/green/subprocess.py", line 58, in 
__init__
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource 
subprocess_orig.Popen.__init__(self, args, 0, *argss, **kwds)
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py", line 858, in __init__
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource 
self._execute_child(args, executable, preexec_fn, close_fds,
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource   File 
"/usr/lib/python3.8/subprocess.py", line 1704, in _execute_child
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource raise 
child_exception_type(errno_num, err_msg, err_filename)
2022-04-07 15:52:11.730 69218 ERROR neutron.api.v2.resource FileNotFoundError: 
[Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'ovsdb-client'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960319

Title:
  Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1960319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960319] Re: Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

2022-04-07 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960319

Title:
  Missing dependency for neutron-server: openvswitch-common

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/neutron/+bug/1960319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Please test proposed package

2022-04-05 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,

Accepted manila into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-wallaby-needed

** Also affects: charm-manila
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: charm-manila
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: charm-manila
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] Re: [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-04-05 Thread Corey Bryant
Uploaded to impish unapproved queue:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/impish/+queue?queue_state=1_text=

** Also affects: manila (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: manila (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Also affects: cloud-archive
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967895] [NEW] [SRU] manila stable releases

2022-04-05 Thread Corey Bryant
Public bug reported:

[Impact]
This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our 
users have access to these improvements.

The update contains the following package updates:

   * impish/xena: manila 13.0.2
   * wallaby: manila 12.1.1

[Test Case]
The following SRU process was followed:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates

In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
in -proposed.  A successful run of all available tests will be required
before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.

The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
‘verification-done’ until this has happened.

[Regression Potential]
In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.

[Discussion]

** Affects: manila (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
- This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our
- users have access to these improvements.
+ This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of 
our users have access to these improvements.
  
  The update contains the following package updates:
  
-* impish/xena: manila 13.0.2
-* wallaby: manila 12.1.1
+    * impish/xena: manila 13.0.2
+    * wallaby: manila 12.1.1
  
  [Test Case]
  The following SRU process was followed:
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/OpenStack/StableReleaseUpdates
  
- In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team will
- run their continuous integration test against the packages that are in
- -proposed.  A successful run of all available tests will be required before 
the
- proposed packages can be let into -updates.
+ In order to avoid regression of existing consumers, the OpenStack team
+ will run their continuous integration test against the packages that are
+ in -proposed.  A successful run of all available tests will be required
+ before the proposed packages can be let into -updates.
  
- The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of the
- executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark ‘verification-done’ 
until
- this has happened.
+ The OpenStack team will be in charge of attaching the output summary of
+ the executed tests. The OpenStack team members will not mark
+ ‘verification-done’ until this has happened.
  
  [Regression Potential]
  In order to mitigate the regression potential, the results of the
  aforementioned tests are attached to this bug.
  
  [Discussion]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967895

Title:
  [SRU] manila stable releases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/+bug/1967895/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1927519] Re: Mitigate libvirt: error : unable to set AppArmor profile 'libvirt-' for '/usr/bin/kvm-spice': No such file or directory

2022-04-05 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package libvirt - 8.0.0-1ubuntu6~cloud0
---

 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu6~cloud0) focal-yoga; urgency=medium
 .
   * New update for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu6) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * d/control: recommend swtpm-tools (LP: #1948748)
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu5) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * apparmor: Fix QEMU access for UEFI variable files. Backported from
 upstream master commit 7aec69b7fb9d0c. (Closes: #1006324, LP: #1962035)
 Refresh apparmor_profiles_local_include.patch to resolve the conflict.
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu4) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * No-change rebuild against libwireshark15.
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu3) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * Revert "d/rules, d/libvirt-daemon-system.{postinst,prerm}: never stop
 system services and sockets."
 Due to the fix being in debhelper we no more need this mitigation now.
 (LP: #1959054)
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu2) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * No-change rebuild to update maintainer scripts, see LP: 1959054
 .
 libvirt (8.0.0-1ubuntu1) jammy; urgency=medium
 .
   * Merge 8.0.0 from Debian unstable (LP: #1946869)
 Among many other fixes and improvements this fixes ceph usage
 in regard to apparmor (LP: #1588576)
 Remaining changes:
 - libvirt-uri.sh: Automatically switch default libvirt URI for users
   via user profile (xen URI on dom0, qemu:///system otherwise)
   [contains lintian fixups of 6.6.0-1ubuntu1]
 - Disable libssh2 support (universe dependency)
 - d/control: add libzfslinux-dev to build-deps
 - d/control: drop libvirt-lxc, vbox and xen drivers to suggest
 - d/control: breaks replaces for augeas lenses move in 6.0.0-1
   (follows Debian, droppable >22.04)
 - debian/patches/ubuntu/ovmf_paths.patch: adjust paths to secboot.fd UEFI
   Secure Boot enabled variants of the OVMF firmware and variable store for
   the paths where we ship these files in Ubuntu.
 - Set qemu-group to kvm (for compat with older ubuntu)
 - Additional apport package-hook
 - Autostart default bridged network (As upstream does, but not Debian).
   In addition to just enabling it our solution provides:
   + do not autostart if subnet is already taken (e.g. in guests).
   + iterate some alternative subnets before giving up
 - d/p/ubuntu/Allow-libvirt-group-to-access-the-socket.patch: This is
   the group based access to libvirt functions as it was used in Ubuntu
   for quite a long time.
   + d/p/ubuntu/daemon-augeas-fix-expected.patch fix some related tests
 due to the group access change.
   + d/libvirt-daemon-system.postinst: add users in sudo to the libvirt
 group.
 - d/p/u/parallel-shutdown.patch: set parallel shutdown by default.
 - Update README.Debian with Ubuntu changes
 - d/p/ubuntu/ubuntu_machine_type.patch: accept ubuntu types as pci440fx
 - fix autopkgtests (LP 1899180)
   + d/t/control, d/t/smoke-qemu-session: fixup smoke-qemu-session by making
 vmlinuz available and accessible (Debian bug 848314)
   + d/t/control: fix smoke-qemu-session by ensuring the service will run
 installing libvirt-daemon-system
   + d/t/smoke-lxc: fix smoke-lxc by ignoring potential issues on destroy as
 long as the following undefine succeeds
   + d/t/smoke-lxc: use systemd instead of sysV to restart the service
   + d/t/control, d/t/smoke-lxc: retry service restart and skip test if
 failing; This was flaky on some release/architectures
   + d/t/smoke-lxc: retry check_domain being flaky on arm64
 - dnsmasq related enhancements
   [now contains dnsmasq-as-priv-user of 6.6.0-1ubuntu1]
   + run dnsmasq as libvirt-dnsmasq (LP: 1743718)
   + d/libvirt-daemon-system.postinst: add libvirt-dnsmasq user and group
   + d/libvirt-daemon-system.postrm: remove libvirt-dnsmasq user and group
 on purge
   + d/p/ubuntu/dnsmasq-as-priv-user: write dnsmasq config with user
 libvirt-dnsmasq and adapt the self tests to expect that config
   + d/libvirt-daemon-system.postinst: fix old libvirt-dnsmasq users group
   + Add dnsmasq configuration to work with system wide dnsmasq-base
 - d/p/ubuntu/set-default-machine-to-ubuntu.patch: to select default
   machine type correctly with newer qemu/libvirt
 - d/p/ubuntu/lp-1861125-ubuntu-models: recognize Ubuntu models for
   (LP 1861125) fixups
 - d/p/ubuntu/wait-for-qemu-kvm.patch - avoid hangs on startup (LP 1887592)
 - Apparmor Delta that is Ubuntu specific or yet to be upstreamed
   split into logical pieces. File names in debian/patches/ubuntu-aa/:
   + 0020-virt-aa-helper-ubuntu-storage-paths.patch:
 apparmor, virt-aa-helper: Allow various storage pools and image
 locations
   + 0029-appmor-libvirt-qemu-Add-9p-support.patch: appmor,
 libvirt-qemu: Add 9p support
   + 

[Bug 1927519] Re: Mitigate libvirt: error : unable to set AppArmor profile 'libvirt-' for '/usr/bin/kvm-spice': No such file or directory

2022-04-05 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927519

Title:
  Mitigate libvirt: error : unable to set AppArmor profile 'libvirt-' for '/usr/bin/kvm-spice': No such file or directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1927519/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965819] Re: list object has no attribute 'acked'

2022-04-04 Thread Corey Bryant
** Also affects: python-ovsdbapp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: python-ovsdbapp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: python-ovsdbapp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: neutron (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965819

Title:
  list object has no attribute 'acked'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/networking-ovn/+bug/1965819/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953363] Re: [MIR] python-xmlschema, elementpath, importlib-resources

2022-03-30 Thread Corey Bryant
New version of python3-xmlschema is now in jammy-proposed.

** Changed in: python-xmlschema (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953363

Title:
  [MIR] python-xmlschema, elementpath, importlib-resources

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elementpath/+bug/1953363/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Please test proposed package

2022-03-30 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello lmercl, or anyone else affected,

Accepted horizon into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does
not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change
the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your
testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957817] Please test proposed package

2022-03-30 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ovn into ussuri-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:ussuri-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-ussuri-needed to verification-ussuri-done. If it does
not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change
the tag to verification-ussuri-failed. In either case, details of your
testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-ussuri-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957817

Title:
  Multicast traffic is broken between VMs on different hypervisors using
  provider networks

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1957817/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Please test proposed package

2022-03-29 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Luciano, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cinder into wallaby-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:wallaby-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-wallaby-needed to verification-wallaby-done. If it
does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and
change the tag to verification-wallaby-failed. In either case, details
of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-wallaby-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Please test proposed package

2022-03-29 Thread Corey Bryant
Hello Luciano, or anyone else affected,

Accepted cinder into xena-proposed. The package will build now and be
available in the Ubuntu Cloud Archive in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. To enable the -proposed
repository:

  sudo add-apt-repository cloud-archive:xena-proposed
  sudo apt-get update

Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag
from verification-xena-needed to verification-xena-done. If it does not
fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the
tag to verification-xena-failed. In either case, details of your testing
will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance!

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: Triaged => Fix Committed

** Tags added: verification-xena-needed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948507] Re: TypeError when computing QOS feature name

2022-03-29 Thread Corey Bryant
Uploaded to ubuntu impish unapproved queue and wallaby-staging cloud
archive.

** Also affects: cinder (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cinder (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Also affects: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948507

Title:
  TypeError when computing QOS feature name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1948507/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Re: Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
Uploaded to impish and focal unapproved queues, as well as wallaby-
staging and victoria-staging.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953363] Re: [MIR] python-xmlschema, elementpath, importlib-resources

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
Seth, I think we have time still. Do you think this gives us enough time
for Jammy?

sil2100> Łukasz Zemczak coreycb: the earlier the better. As seb128
mentioned, we don't really have any hard freezes for these (besides
final freeze of course), but the 'perfect goal' would be to get as much
in for the beta this week as possible, so that if it's to be pulled in,
it's tested as part of the Beta

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953363

Title:
  [MIR] python-xmlschema, elementpath, importlib-resources

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elementpath/+bug/1953363/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940834] Re: Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
** Changed in: cloud-archive
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/ussuri
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/victoria
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: New => Triaged

** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: cloud-archive/xena
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Focal)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Focal)
   Importance: Undecided => High

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Impish)
   Status: Confirmed => Triaged

** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Impish)
   Importance: Undecided => High

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940834

Title:
  Horizon not show flavor details in instance and resize is not possible
  - Flavor ID is not supported by nova

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1940834/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857026] Re: OVN doesn't seem to support reverse DNS lookups for instances

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package ovn - 20.12.0-0ubuntu3.1~cloud0
---

 ovn (20.12.0-0ubuntu3.1~cloud0) focal-wallaby; urgency=medium
 .
   * Add support for PTR DNS requests (LP: #1857026)
 - d/p/lp-1857026-controller-Add-support-for-PTR-DNS-requests.patch


** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857026

Title:
  OVN doesn't seem to support reverse DNS lookups for instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-ovn-central/+bug/1857026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1857026] Update Released

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ovn has completed
successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. In the
event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates
please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report
regression-update so we can easily find any regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1857026

Title:
  OVN doesn't seem to support reverse DNS lookups for instances

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/charm-ovn-central/+bug/1857026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956752] Re: [SRU] openvswitch 2.15.2

2022-03-28 Thread Corey Bryant
This bug was fixed in the package openvswitch - 2.15.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0
---

 openvswitch (2.15.2-0ubuntu1~cloud0) focal-wallaby; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream release for the Ubuntu Cloud Archive.
 .
 openvswitch (2.15.2-0ubuntu1) hirsute; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream point release (LP: #1956752).
   * d/p/CVE-2021-36980.patch: Dropped, included in release.
   * d/p/ovs-dev-ovs-ctl-Allow-recording-hostname-separately.patch:
 Dropped, included in release.
   * d/p/py3-compat.patch: Refresh.


** Changed in: cloud-archive/wallaby
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956752

Title:
  [SRU] openvswitch 2.15.2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1956752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >