Re: [Bug 1020207] Re: gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file as first action after mounting

2013-12-30 Thread Dave Spano
I'm not sure whether it's an issue or not anymore. I discontinued using
gfs2 because I could not get the kernel panic to go away.


Dave Spano 


- Original Message -

From: Christopher M. Penalver christopher.m.penal...@gmail.com 
To: dsp...@optogenics.com 
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2013 4:12:56 PM 
Subject: [Bug 1020207] Re: gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file as first action 
after mounting 

Dave Spano, this bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any 
activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? If 
so, could you please test for this with the latest development release 
of Ubuntu? ISO images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com 
/daily-live/current/ . 

If it remains an issue, could you please run the following command in 
the development release from a Terminal 
(Applications-Accessories-Terminal), as it will automatically gather 
and attach updated debug information to this report: 

apport-collect -p linux replace-with-bug-number

If reproducible, could you also please test the latest upstream kernel 
available (not the daily folder) following 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds ? It will allow additional 
upstream developers to examine the issue. Once you've tested the upstream 
kernel, please comment on which kernel version specifically you tested. If this 
bug is fixed in the mainline kernel, please add the following tags: 
kernel-fixed-upstream 
kernel-fixed-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER 

where VERSION-NUMBER is the version number of the kernel you tested. For 
example: 
kernel-fixed-upstream-v3.13-rc6 

This can be done by clicking on the yellow circle with a black pencil icon next 
to the word Tags located at the bottom of the bug description. As well, please 
remove the tag: 
needs-upstream-testing 

If the mainline kernel does not fix this bug, please add the following tags: 
kernel-bug-exists-upstream 
kernel-bug-exists-upstream-VERSION-NUMBER 

As well, please remove the tag: 
needs-upstream-testing 

Once testing of the upstream kernel is complete, please mark this bug's 
Status as Confirmed. Please let us know your results. Thank you for your 
understanding. 

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) 
Status: In Progress = Incomplete 

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) 
Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) = (unassigned) 

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug 
report. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020207 

Title: 
gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file as first action after mounting 

Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: 
Incomplete 

Bug description: 
I have an active/active drbd cluster with pacemaker running on cman. 
If I create a file on the shared gfs2 file system on one node, then 
try to delete it on the other, I'm receiving this kernel panic. I get 
the same error on both nodes, so it's not specific to either machine. 

Jul 2 12:54:37 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[35] on nova-volumes:0 
for client 40986: pid 2385 exited with return code 0 
Jul 2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: debug: rsc:p_gfsd:1 monitor[63] (pid 2459) 
Jul 2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[63] on p_gfsd:1 for 
client 40986: pid 2459 exited with return code 0 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.234067] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at 0018 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.236034] IP: [a037c00a] 
gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237305] PGD 40ca9f067 PUD 40de7b067 PMD 0 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] CPU 7 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Modules linked in: gfs2 drbd 
lru_cache ipmi_si mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class mptctl mptbase 
ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler dell_rbu kvm_amd kvm dlm configfs vesafb ib_iser 
rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp 
libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ext2 bonding psmouse sp5100_tco dcdbas tpm_tis 
joydev serio_raw i2c_piix4 amd64_edac_mod k10temp edac_core acpi_power_meter 
edac_mce_amd mac_hid lp parport usbhid hid ses enclosure igb megaraid_sas dca 
bnx2 [last unloaded: ipmi_si] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Pid: 2544, comm: rm Not tainted 
3.2.0-26-generic #41-Ubuntu Dell Inc. PowerEdge R515/03X0MN 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RIP: 0010:[a037c00a] 
[a037c00a] gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RSP: 0018:8801fe13fd28 EFLAGS: 
00010296 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RAX:  RBX: 
880410faa080 RCX: 8801fe13fd40 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RDX:  RSI: 
00012346 RDI: 88040c8b1440 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RBP: 8801fe13fe38 R08: 
4000 R09:  
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] R10: fde3ec81bcd7720a R11

[Bug 1020238] Re: nova client keeps asking for a keyring password

2012-10-19 Thread Dave Spano
In this mailing list response, Vish says you can use 
export OS_NO_CACHE=1 in your .bashrc to stop this behaviour. 

https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg16095.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to python-novaclient in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020238

Title:
  nova client keeps asking for a keyring password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1020238/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1020238] Re: nova client keeps asking for a keyring password

2012-10-19 Thread Dave Spano
In this mailing list response, Vish says you can use 
export OS_NO_CACHE=1 in your .bashrc to stop this behaviour. 

https://lists.launchpad.net/openstack/msg16095.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020238

Title:
  nova client keeps asking for a keyring password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-novaclient/+bug/1020238/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1065702] Re: After folsom upgrade, instances can no longer access existing volumes.

2012-10-18 Thread Dave Spano
I used the block_device_mapping table to figure out what to rename.
Just throwing that out there for people who need to change their
existing volumes before a fix is put out.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065702

Title:
  After folsom upgrade, instances can no longer access existing volumes.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1065702/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1065702] Re: After folsom upgrade, instances can no longer access existing volumes.

2012-10-18 Thread Dave Spano
I used the block_device_mapping table to figure out what to rename.
Just throwing that out there for people who need to change their
existing volumes before a fix is put out.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065702

Title:
  After folsom upgrade, instances can no longer access existing volumes.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1065702/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1028718] Re: nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

2012-08-31 Thread Dave Spano
Thank you Clint. I'm using ceph also, and was interested in a solution
to this problem as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nova in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028718

Title:
  nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1028718/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1028718] Re: nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

2012-08-31 Thread Dave Spano
Thank you Clint. I'm using ceph also, and was interested in a solution
to this problem as well.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1028718

Title:
  nova volumes are inappropriately clingy for ceph

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1028718/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1020207] Re: gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file on other cluster node

2012-08-21 Thread Dave Spano
I ended up using ceph instead of gfs2 because of this error. I do still
have the kernel source (linux 3.2.0) that I was using at the time, and
it's actually completely different than the gfs2_unlink routine in the
patch.

There are no lines with if(!rgd).

This is what I've got:

static int gfs2_unlink(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry) 
{ 
struct gfs2_inode *dip = GFS2_I(dir); 
struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = GFS2_SB(dir); 
struct inode *inode = dentry-d_inode; 
struct gfs2_inode *ip = GFS2_I(inode); 
struct buffer_head *bh; 
struct gfs2_holder ghs[3]; 
struct gfs2_rgrpd *rgd; 
int error; 

gfs2_holder_init(dip-i_gl, LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE, 0, ghs); 
gfs2_holder_init(ip-i_gl, LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE, 0, ghs + 1); 

rgd = gfs2_blk2rgrpd(sdp, ip-i_no_addr); 
gfs2_holder_init(rgd-rd_gl, LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE, 0, ghs + 2); 


error = gfs2_glock_nq(ghs); /* parent */ 
if (error) 
goto out_parent; 

error = gfs2_glock_nq(ghs + 1); /* child */ 
if (error) 
goto out_child; 

error = -ENOENT; 
if (inode-i_nlink == 0) 
goto out_rgrp; 

if (S_ISDIR(inode-i_mode)) { 
error = -ENOTEMPTY; 
if (ip-i_entries  2 || inode-i_nlink  2) 
goto out_rgrp; 
} 

error = gfs2_glock_nq(ghs + 2); /* rgrp */ 
if (error) 
goto out_rgrp; 

error = gfs2_unlink_ok(dip, dentry-d_name, ip); 
if (error) 
goto out_gunlock; 

error = gfs2_trans_begin(sdp, 2*RES_DINODE + 3*RES_LEAF + RES_RG_BIT, 0); 
if (error) 
goto out_gunlock; 

error = gfs2_meta_inode_buffer(ip, bh); 
if (error) 
goto out_end_trans; 

error = gfs2_unlink_inode(dip, dentry, bh); 
brelse(bh); 

out_end_trans: 
gfs2_trans_end(sdp); 
out_gunlock: 
gfs2_glock_dq(ghs + 2); 
out_rgrp: 
gfs2_holder_uninit(ghs + 2); 
gfs2_glock_dq(ghs + 1); 
out_child: 
gfs2_holder_uninit(ghs + 1); 
gfs2_glock_dq(ghs); 
out_parent: 
gfs2_holder_uninit(ghs); 
return error; 
} 


Dave Spano 
Optogenics 
Systems Administrator 


- Original Message -

From: Bart Verwilst b...@verwilst.be 
To: dsp...@optogenics.com 
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 8:26:22 AM 
Subject: [Bug 1020207] Re: gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file on other cluster 
node 

I wonder whether your distro kernel has this patch: 
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=718b97bd6b03445be53098e3c8f896aeebc304aa
 

Thats the most likely thing that I can see that has been fixed 
recently. 

 Steven Whitehouse from Redhat.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug 
report. 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020207 

Title: 
gfs2 kernel oops when deleting file on other cluster node 

Status in “gfs2-utils” package in Ubuntu: 
Confirmed 

Bug description: 
I have an active/active drbd cluster with pacemaker running on cman. 
If I create a file on the shared gfs2 file system on one node, then 
try to delete it on the other, I'm receiving this kernel panic. I get 
the same error on both nodes, so it's not specific to either machine. 

Jul 2 12:54:37 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[35] on nova-volumes:0 
for client 40986: pid 2385 exited with return code 0 
Jul 2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: debug: rsc:p_gfsd:1 monitor[63] (pid 2459) 
Jul 2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[63] on p_gfsd:1 for 
client 40986: pid 2459 exited with return code 0 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.234067] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at 0018 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.236034] IP: [a037c00a] 
gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237305] PGD 40ca9f067 PUD 40de7b067 PMD 0 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] CPU 7 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Modules linked in: gfs2 drbd 
lru_cache ipmi_si mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class mptctl mptbase 
ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler dell_rbu kvm_amd kvm dlm configfs vesafb ib_iser 
rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp 
libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ext2 bonding psmouse sp5100_tco dcdbas tpm_tis 
joydev serio_raw i2c_piix4 amd64_edac_mod k10temp edac_core acpi_power_meter 
edac_mce_amd mac_hid lp parport usbhid hid ses enclosure igb megaraid_sas dca 
bnx2 [last unloaded: ipmi_si] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Pid: 2544, comm: rm Not tainted 
3.2.0-26-generic #41-Ubuntu Dell Inc. PowerEdge R515/03X0MN 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RIP: 0010:[a037c00a] 
[a037c00a] gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2] 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RSP: 0018:8801fe13fd28 EFLAGS: 
00010296 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RAX:  RBX: 
880410faa080 RCX: 8801fe13fd40 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RDX:  RSI: 
00012346 RDI: 88040c8b1440 
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RBP: 8801fe13fe38 R08: 
4000 R09:  
Jul 2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] R10

[Bug 1020207] Re: gfs2 on active/active drbd crashes when deleting file on other node

2012-07-05 Thread Dave Spano
I found this in a blog posting found here: http://blog.init.hr/?p=186.

Important: We’ve encountered couple of bugs that are in the queue for
fixing. If you are using or have a desire of using cLVM, please do not
use 12.04 yet. Once these fixes land into archives, we’ll send an email
to ubuntu-ha mailing list and add cLVM howto to the wiki.

Is this one of the bugs that was referred to there?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020207

Title:
  gfs2 on active/active drbd crashes when deleting file on other node

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gfs2-utils/+bug/1020207/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1020207] [NEW] gfs2 on active/active drbd crashes when deleting file on other node

2012-07-02 Thread Dave Spano
Public bug reported:

I have an active/active drbd cluster with pacemaker running on cman. If
I create a file on the shared gfs2 file system on one node, then try to
delete it on the other, I'm receiving this kernel panic. I get the same
error on both nodes, so it's not specific to either machine.

Jul  2 12:54:37 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[35] on 
nova-volumes:0 for client 40986: pid 2385 exited with return code 0
Jul  2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: debug: rsc:p_gfsd:1 monitor[63] (pid 2459)
Jul  2 12:54:43 ha1 lrmd: [40983]: info: operation monitor[63] on p_gfsd:1 for 
client 40986: pid 2459 exited with return code 0
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.234067] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL 
pointer dereference at 0018
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.236034] IP: [a037c00a] 
gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237305] PGD 40ca9f067 PUD 40de7b067 PMD 0 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Oops:  [#1] SMP 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] CPU 7 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Modules linked in: gfs2 drbd 
lru_cache ipmi_si mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class mptctl mptbase 
ipmi_devintf ipmi_msghandler dell_rbu kvm_amd kvm dlm configfs vesafb ib_iser 
rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_core ib_addr iscsi_tcp libiscsi_tcp 
libiscsi scsi_transport_iscsi ext2 bonding psmouse sp5100_tco dcdbas tpm_tis 
joydev serio_raw i2c_piix4 amd64_edac_mod k10temp edac_core acpi_power_meter 
edac_mce_amd mac_hid lp parport usbhid hid ses enclosure igb megaraid_sas dca 
bnx2 [last unloaded: ipmi_si]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] Pid: 2544, comm: rm Not tainted 
3.2.0-26-generic #41-Ubuntu Dell Inc. PowerEdge R515/03X0MN
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RIP: 0010:[a037c00a]  
[a037c00a] gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.237336] RSP: 0018:8801fe13fd28  EFLAGS: 
00010296
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RAX:  RBX: 
880410faa080 RCX: 8801fe13fd40
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RDX:  RSI: 
00012346 RDI: 88040c8b1440
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RBP: 8801fe13fe38 R08: 
4000 R09: 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] R10: fde3ec81bcd7720a R11: 
0008 R12: 8801ffc709c0
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] R13: 8801fe13fd80 R14: 
8803f479d140 R15: 88040c8b1000
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] FS:  7fa1b5055700() 
GS:88041fa2() knlGS:
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] CS:  0010 DS:  ES:  CR0: 
80050033
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] CR2: 0018 CR3: 
0003f207c000 CR4: 06e0
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] DR0:  DR1: 
 DR2: 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] DR3:  DR6: 
0ff0 DR7: 0400
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] Process rm (pid: 2544, threadinfo 
8801fe13e000, task 8802044b5bc0)
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] Stack:
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  0003 8801fa72e260 
8801fe13fd58 8801fe13fd40
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  8801fe13fd40 8801fa72e218 
88020476a680 0001
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]    
a037bfda 8801fe13fd80
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] Call Trace:
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [a037bfda] ? 
gfs2_unlink+0x5a/0x220 [gfs2]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [a037bff4] ? 
gfs2_unlink+0x74/0x220 [gfs2]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [8129cb2c] ? 
security_inode_permission+0x1c/0x30
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [81184e70] 
vfs_unlink.part.26+0x80/0xf0
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [81184f1c] 
vfs_unlink+0x3c/0x60
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [8118758a] 
do_unlinkat+0x1aa/0x1d0
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [8117ce5a] ? 
sys_newfstatat+0x2a/0x40
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [811880d2] 
sys_unlinkat+0x22/0x40
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  [81661fc2] 
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] Code: 00 00 49 83 c5 40 31 d2 4c 89 
e9 be 01 00 00 00 e8 fc 1e ff ff 48 8b b3 28 02 00 00 4c 89 ff e8 ad 7e 00 00 
48 8d 8d 08 ff ff ff 48 8b 78 18 31 d2 be 01 00 00 00 48 83 e9 80 e8 d2 1e ff 
ff 48 
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] RIP  [a037c00a] 
gfs2_unlink+0x8a/0x220 [gfs2]
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032]  RSP 8801fe13fd28
Jul  2 12:54:49 ha1 kernel: [238066.380032] CR2: