[Bug 606808] Re: Can remove / reinstall proprietary ati drivers
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104234/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104235/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104236/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104237/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104238/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104239/DpkgTerminalLog.txt ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104240/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104241/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: "PciDisplay.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104242/PciDisplay.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104243/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104244/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104245/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: "RelatedPackageVersions.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104246/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104247/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104248/UdevLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgConf.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104249/XorgConf.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLog.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104250/XorgLog.txt ** Attachment added: "XorgLogOld.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104251/XorgLogOld.txt ** Attachment added: "Xrandr.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104252/Xrandr.txt ** Attachment added: "setxkbmap.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104253/setxkbmap.txt ** Attachment added: "xdpyinfo.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104254/xdpyinfo.txt ** Attachment added: "xkbcomp.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52104255/xkbcomp.txt -- Can remove / reinstall proprietary ati drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 606808] [NEW] Can remove / reinstall proprietary ati drivers
Public bug reported: Just upgraded from 9.10 tonight, had an nvidia card for a while but replaced it with an ATI card a few days ago. After upgrading to 10.4, the ati drivers were not working. Tried to remove them to reinstall, got this error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx AptOrdering: xorg-driver-fglrx: Remove fglrx-amdcccle: Remove fglrx: Remove Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jul 17 23:31:19 2010 DkmsStatus: fglrx, 8.723.1, 2.6.32-23-generic, x86_64: installed ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 MachineType: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. P55-UD4P ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=0184f770-38c3-4629-aad2-785a5ba4c195 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: fglrx-installer Title: package fglrx 2:8.723.1-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-removal script returned error exit status 2 dmi.bios.date: 06/28/2010 dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc. dmi.bios.version: F10 dmi.board.name: P55-UD4P dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.board.version: x.x dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF10:bd06/28/2010:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnP55-UD4P:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnP55-UD4P:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr: dmi.product.name: P55-UD4P dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. glxinfo: Error: command ['glxinfo'] failed with exit code -11: Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0". system: distro: Ubuntu codename: lucid architecture: x86_64 kernel: 2.6.32-23-generic ** Affects: fglrx-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package lucid -- Can remove / reinstall proprietary ati drivers https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 115103] Re: Boost 1.34.0 released, plan to update?
When a library releases a non-bug-fix update after an Ubuntu release, is the official Ubuntu policy that it will not be updated until the next Ubuntu release? That is to say, except for bug fixes, the package versions that are in Ubuntu release X are the only package versions that will ever be in the Ubuntu release? Also, this page about the package in gutsy still describes the package version as 1.33.1 even though the source package appears to be 1.34.0: http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/gutsy/libdevel/libboost-dev -- Boost 1.34.0 released, plan to update? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/115103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96430] Re: MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631)
This thread makes it appear that they are releasing 96xx series drivers as "legacy" drivers: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=74a34b9834fb4572543ff4897cbec4b4&t=81668 Ben Collins, have you (or anyone else) actually talked to nvidia about what they are planning or are we all just taking shots in the dark? -- MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631) https://launchpad.net/bugs/96430 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96430] Re: MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631)
Timo Aaltonen (and Ben Collins I suppose), if nothing else the 9631 drivers are 4 months newer than the 7184 series. Here's another good post by an nvidia employee where he mentions the 71xx "legacy branch" and a 96xx "legacy branch": http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=1208356&postcount=2 I read that as saying it'll be at least as well supported as the 71xx series. I'll ask this again though: have you actually confirmed anything with nvidia or are we all (still) just making guesses? If you don't think nvidia will support the 96xx series like they have the 71xx series, I guess I can't do anything about it. However, I agree with cement_head. You can't claim that this "just works" or that it makes life easy for non-power users. -- MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631) https://launchpad.net/bugs/96430 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96430] Re: MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631)
We are using a development version to test it and provide feedback to the Ubuntu team. While some of these comments may not be constructive, isn't the whole point of releasing public betas to have this discussion now with a few testers rather than later when it causes problems for many more people? I think James has a good idea to have a single nvidia-glx package that includes all 3 driver versions and uses the correct version automatically. Perhaps it is not feasible for Feisty at this point (or maybe even at all, I don't know), but I'd say it's worth considering. Feisty is scheduled to be released in 15 days, and I still don't see any sign of the 96xx driver in the repos. I'm sure we would all like to make sure it gets tested before Feisty is released. When can we expect to see it in the repos? -- MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96430 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96430] Re: MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631)
I went ahead and asked nvidia: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=88867 They are supporting the 96xx series just like the 71xx series. -- MASTER: Request for new-legacy nvidia drivers (9631) https://launchpad.net/bugs/96430 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96972] Re: [Feisty] nvidia's 97xx driver dropped support for GeForce4 and below
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 96430 *** You are right, it is. I'm not sure how I missed that report, sorry. -- [Feisty] nvidia's 97xx driver dropped support for GeForce4 and below https://launchpad.net/bugs/96972 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 96972] [Feisty] nvidia's 97xx driver dropped support for GeForce4 and below
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nvidia-glx I updated from edgy to feisty over the weekend on my laptop with a GeForce4 4200 Go card. While the installation of the proprietary nvidia drivers was very slick, it appears that the nvidia 97xx driver series no longer supports anything older than a GeForceFX: http://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86/1.0-9755/README/appendix-a.html Note that GeForce2 - GeForce4 cards are still supported in the 96xx series, which is much newer than the "legacy" 71xx series. I guess I now have the option of either using the non-accelerated nv driver, using a very old 71xx driver (which by the way is not supported by the proprietary driver loader), or manually installing the nvidia driver. I believe the proprietary driver system should detect which driver is best suited for the users card and install that, rather than blindly installing the 97xx series driver and breaking X for anyone with an older card. ** Affects: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- [Feisty] nvidia's 97xx driver dropped support for GeForce4 and below https://launchpad.net/bugs/96972 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74186] Re: (Ignore, user error) Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization
** Summary changed: - Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization + (Ignore, user error) Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization -- (Ignore, user error) Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization https://launchpad.net/bugs/74186 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74186] Re: Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization
I learned that the order of the command line arguments to g++ makes a difference. The fedora user I mentioned earlier did not use my command line, he built the sample code in Eclipse. Based on what Eclipse did, I found that this works fine for me: g++ -Wall -Werror -o Test main.cpp -lboost_serialization Sorry for the false report. If I can, I'll mark it as closed. -- Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization https://launchpad.net/bugs/74186 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74186] Re: Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization
A Fedora 4 user running gcc 4.0.0 and boost 1.32 reported that my sample code works fine. That isn't a perfect match since he has an older version of boost, but it's at least worth noting. -- Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization https://launchpad.net/bugs/74186 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74186] Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: libboost-serialization-dev
I am attempting to use boost serialization in Edgy Eft, but I cannot get
even a simple test to link properly. I had files to attach, but I don't
see how to do that. I get pages of linker errors like this:
// BEGIN error messages
/tmp/ccd96NVf.o: In function
`boost::archive::text_oarchive::text_oarchive(std::basic_ostream >&, unsigned int)':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost7archive13text_oarchiveC1ERSoj[boost::archive::text_oarchive::text_oarchive(std::basic_ostream >&, unsigned int)]+0x1b): undefined reference to
`boost::archive::text_oarchive_impl::text_oarchive_impl(std::basic_ostream >&, unsigned int)'
/tmp/ccd96NVf.o: In function
`boost::archive::detail::common_oarchive::~common_oarchive()':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost7archive6detail15common_oarchiveINS0_13text_oarchiveEED2Ev[boost::archive::detail::common_oarchive::~common_oarchive()]+0x17):
undefined reference to
`boost::archive::detail::basic_oarchive::~basic_oarchive()'
/tmp/ccd96NVf.o: In function
`boost::archive::text_oarchive_impl::~text_oarchive_impl()':
main.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost7archive18text_oarchive_implINS0_13text_oarchiveEED2Ev[boost::archive::text_oarchive_impl::~text_oarchive_impl()]+0x39):
undefined reference to
`boost::archive::basic_text_oprimitive > >::~basic_text_oprimitive()'
main.cpp:(.text._ZN5boost7archive18text_oarchive_implINS0_13text_oarchiveEED2Ev[boost::archive::text_oarchive_impl::~text_oarchive_impl()]+0x62):
undefined reference to
`boost::archive::basic_text_oprimitive > >::~basic_text_oprimitive()'
// END error messages
Here is my sample main.cpp code:
// BEGIN main.cpp
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(int argv, char** argc) {
std::ofstream s("./test.txt", std::ios::out|std::ios::binary);
boost::archive::text_oarchive oa(s);
//oa << 5;
return 0;
}
// END main.cpp
I am compiling/linking it with this command:
g++ -Wall -Werror -lboost_serialization -o Test main.cpp
I have everything in Synaptic named "libboost-*" installed already. It seems
like I need another library linked in, but can't figure out what it should be.
There is not libboost_archive library that I can see. I thought perhaps
"-lboost_filesystem" would do it, but that doesn't help. Another Ubuntu user
has reproduced this, so I believe I am either doing something dumb or there is
a bug in the library.
Please let me know what you think, thanks for the help.
** Affects: boost (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Cannot build simple test app using boost serialization
https://launchpad.net/bugs/74186
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
