[Bug 1714570] Re: enabledcores=1, but all 4 cores are online
I've checked, and same issue on Ubuntu 18.04.5 (i.e cores=4 enabledcores=1) BUT, good news, at least there lshw -version reports a version: B.02.18 and, yes, it is a 'B'?! Packager reports lshw as version 02.18-0.1ubuntu6.18.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714570 Title: enabledcores=1, but all 4 cores are online To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lshw/+bug/1714570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1714570] Re: enabledcores=1, but all 4 cores are online
I've noticed the same thing on Ubuntu 20.04. That is, 4 cores but reports only one enabled -- even when they are all "working hard". Also, sudo lshw -version just reports a "blank line", no version number. The installer says that I have lshw version 02.18.85-0.3ubuntu2.20.04.1 HTH -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714570 Title: enabledcores=1, but all 4 cores are online To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lshw/+bug/1714570/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893484] Re: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV
After reading https://support.google.com/chrome/thread/67845533?hl=en I tried, on a whim, chromium-browser --disable-gpu and all works fine. I do not know what that means, but thought I'd post it here for 'data'. Perhaps it will help someone understand where to look for debugging, or, even, where the bug belongs. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893484 Title: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1893484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893484] Re: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV
C#8 I tried removing ~/.config/chromium but it did not change the empty window problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893484 Title: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1893484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1893484] Re: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV
> I would appreciate if you could comment on this bug when > you get the update to let me know whether chromium-browser still works. For me, chromium-browser stopped working when updated to version 85.0.4183.83 (on Ubuntu 18.04.5). It "comes up" but no graphics (or text) are displayed. Just a large empty window (still with a title) is displayed. A right-mouse click will bring up an empty window that looks to be a context menu but it is completely blank. I have tried "purging" chromium-browser and re-installing, but no change. It happened a few days ago, approximately Sept. 8, and I just now started searching for issues, and found this bug open that might be related. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893484 Title: Google Chrome 85.0.4183.83 crahses with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1893484/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855736] Re: Duplicity fails to start
If it helps, the output of the 'find' commands, mentioned prior to comment #25 are as you might guess: $ sudo find /usr -type d -name duplicity -ls 1471833 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jun 9 2017 /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity 54981 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Jan 10 20:01 /usr/local/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/duplicity $ sudo find /usr -type f -name duplicity -ls 55524 8 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5276 Jan 10 20:38 /usr/local/bin/duplicity 1177994 64 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root62300 Jan 10 20:19 /usr/bin/duplicity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855736 Title: Duplicity fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1855736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1855736] Re: Duplicity fails to start
I had/have similar issue as "resolved" in comment #25: Initially, after building and installing version 0.8.09, I would try duplicity --version and get Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/local/bin/duplicity", line 55, in from duplicity.dup_main import main ImportError: No module named 'duplicity' I came upon this bug, saw comment #25 where it was suggested to change the shebang to 'python3'. I checked, and mine was ALREADY saying 'python3', but I changed it to 'python2' and then duplicity --version responds correctly with duplicity 0.8.09 If it helps, one of the first messages from running $ sudo python setup.py install --prefix=/usr/local is /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/setuptools/dist.py:333: UserWarning: Normalizing '0.8.09' to '0.8.9' normalized_version, So it appears to be using python2 (2.7, to be exact) "during the build"? Let me know if you'd like another bug open, or if there already is one to improve build scripts? OR, better yet, maybe your "fix" was a fix for 0.8.10 and it has already been taken care of? Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1855736 Title: Duplicity fails to start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/duplicity/+bug/1855736/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1821033] [NEW] mu is crashing with ***stack smashing detected*** error
Public bug reported: I'm running an 'mu' find command and it looks like it's overrunning the end of an array and triggering some more aggressive memory checking enabled with the newer version of gcc in xenial. Here's the actual command I'm running and the crash output: $ mu find "hello" --threads --include-related -n 500 *** stack smashing detected ***: mu terminated Wed May 3 21:13:44 2000 Aborted (core dumped) $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy maildir-utils maildir-utils: Installed: 0.9.12-3 Candidate: 0.9.12-3 Version table: *** 0.9.12-3 500 500 http://mirrors.rit.edu/ubuntu-archive xenial/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status Please let me know if there's any other information I can gather for you or supply. Thanks, David ** Affects: maildir-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821033 Title: mu is crashing with ***stack smashing detected*** error To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/maildir-utils/+bug/1821033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1314245] Re: Missing r8169 firmware warning when installing Trusty kernel
I got the same after upgrading my HWE version with the following: $ sudo apt-get install linux-generic-lts-trusty linux-image-generic-lts- trusty [ ... ] update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.13.0-30-generic W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168g-3.fw for module r8169 W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8168g-2.fw for module r8169 W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8106e-2.fw for module r8169 W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8106e-1.fw for module r8169 W: Possible missing firmware /lib/firmware/rtl_nic/rtl8411-2.fw for module r8169 run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postinst.d/pm-utils 3.13.0-30-generic /boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-30-generic [ ... ] Let me know if I can contribute any additional information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1314245 Title: Missing r8169 firmware warning when installing Trusty kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-lts-trusty/+bug/1314245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191410] [NEW] package ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: I was just installing ntop with suggests. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 Uname: Linux 3.9.6-davidw-64 x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Jun 15 17:00:35 2013 DuplicateSignature: package:ntop:3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1:subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20120823.1) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: ntop Title: package ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ntop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191410 Title: package ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntop/+bug/1191410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1191410] Re: package ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Sorry, this may have been user error ... it asked me if I wanted to monitor eth0, and I said yes (knowing I had only one network attached) ... but, now I see its name is eth1 ... so, perhaps I just assumed it detected eth0 and it was assuming I'd change it to correct name. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191410 Title: package ntop 3:4.1.0+dfsg1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntop/+bug/1191410/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004151] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004151 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1004151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004151] [NEW] package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
Public bug reported: I just booted up my Ubuntu 12.04 32 bit version, opened a console, ran sudu apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade was given about a dozen or so packages to upgrade, said yes and at the end, failed. I'll paste whole console log here: $ sudo apt-get upgrade Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done The following packages will be upgraded: at-spi2-core gir1.2-atspi-2.0 libatspi2.0-0 libnautilus-extension1a libsnmp-base libsnmp15 libssl1.0.0 linux-headers-3.2.0-24 linux-headers-3.2.0-24-generic-pae linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae linux-libc-dev nautilus nautilus-data openssl python-gi python-gi-cairo python-gobject software-center xserver-common xserver-xorg-core xserver-xorg-input-synaptics xvfb 22 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 58.7 MB of archives. After this operation, 31.7 kB disk space will be freed. Do you want to continue [Y/n]? y Get:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main libssl1.0.0 i386 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.2 [1,002 kB] Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main libatspi2.0-0 i386 2.4.2-0ubuntu0.1 [57.5 kB] Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae i386 3.2.0-24.39 [37.9 MB] Get:4 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main openssl i386 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.2 [519 kB] Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python-gi-cairo i386 3.2.2-1~precise [5,230 B] Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python-gi i386 3.2.2-1~precise [219 kB] Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main at-spi2-core i386 2.4.2-0ubuntu0.1 [44.3 kB] Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main gir1.2-atspi-2.0 i386 2.4.2-0ubuntu0.1 [16.1 kB] Get:9 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main libnautilus-extension1a i386 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu1 [51.4 kB] Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main libsnmp-base all 5.4.3~dfsg-2.4ubuntu1.1 [213 kB] Get:11 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main libsnmp15 i386 5.4.3~dfsg-2.4ubuntu1.1 [1,262 kB] Get:12 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main linux-headers-3.2.0-24 all 3.2.0-24.39 [11.4 MB] Get:13 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main linux-headers-3.2.0-24-generic-pae i386 3.2.0-24.39 [946 kB] Get:14 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main linux-libc-dev i386 3.2.0-24.39 [831 kB] Get:15 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main nautilus-data all 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu1 [63.2 kB] Get:16 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main nautilus i386 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu1 [845 kB] Get:17 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main python-gobject all 3.2.2-1~precise [2,468 B] Get:18 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main software-center all 5.2.2 [617 kB] Get:19 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main xserver-common all 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.2 [32.5 kB] Get:20 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main xserver-xorg-core i386 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.2 [1,676 kB] Get:21 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main xserver-xorg-input-synaptics i386 1.6.0-0ubuntu1~precise1 [71.2 kB] Get:22 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main xvfb i386 2:1.11.4-0ubuntu10.2 [889 kB] Fetched 58.7 MB in 54s (1,079 kB/s) Preconfiguring packages ... (Reading database ... 233066 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libssl1.0.0 1.0.1-4ubuntu5 (using .../libssl1.0.0_1.0.1-4ubuntu5.2_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libssl1.0.0 ... Setting up libssl1.0.0 (1.0.1-4ubuntu5.2) ... Processing triggers for libc-bin ... ldconfig deferred processing now taking place (Reading database ... 233066 files and directories currently installed.) Preparing to replace libatspi2.0-0 2.4.1-0ubuntu0.1 (using .../libatspi2.0-0_2.4.2-0ubuntu0.1_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement libatspi2.0-0 ... Preparing to replace linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.38 (using .../linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae_3.2.0-24.39_i386.deb) ... Done. Unpacking replacement linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae ... Examining /etc/kernel/postrm.d . run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/initramfs-tools 3.2.0-24-generic-pae /boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-24-generic-pae run-parts: executing /etc/kernel/postrm.d/zz-update-grub 3.2.0-24-generic-pae
[Bug 1004151] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
FYI, I rebooted (glad I could!), tried again, same error. But, seeing the message below made me think to say I do have a separate boot partition, if that matters. - - - Running depmod. update-initramfs: deferring update (hook will be called later) Failed to symbolic-link boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic-pae to initrd.img: File exists dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004151 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1004151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004151] Re: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17
BTW, I was able to work around this. I booted by 64 bit version (which is in a separate partition) then mounted the 32 bit partition as plain data mount (not to run anything). It had an empty boot folder (presumably since I have my own boot partition, where the real files reside) and a few symbolic links that pointed to non-existed files in the empty boot folder. So, I removed those (and, the empty boot folder). unmounted it. reboot back onto the 32 bit partition, and could then complete the update just fine. Thanks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004151 Title: package linux-image-3.2.0-24-generic-pae 3.2.0-24.39 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 17 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1004151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955633] Re: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955633 Title: gnome-settings-daemon crashed with signal 5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-settings-daemon/+bug/955633/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 765466] Re: unity launcher does not handle apps launched from shell scripts correctly
In comment 5, Gabe asks about workarounds, in my just duplicated bug 899333 a workaround for my simple use-case was to directly use Exec=gnome-terminal -x testmenu.sh instead of the desired Terminal=true Exec=testmenu.sh I'm sure that wouldn't work for everyone (have only skim read the other use-cases in this bug) and is not a great long term solution ... but, thought I'd share what little I know. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765466 Title: unity launcher does not handle apps launched from shell scripts correctly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/765466/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 734381] Re: Eclipse splash screen shows a resize grip under unity
I just wanted to say a personal thanks for this fix (and, the reporting, and investigating, and the releasing, and the building ...). I have confirmed on Ubuntu 12.04 Beta 1 that the Eclipse splash screen displays without the resize grip, and it looks much better it is great to see attention paid to such detail (paper-cut indeed!) Thanks again, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/734381 Title: Eclipse splash screen shows a resize grip under unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse/+bug/734381/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272171] Re: Firefox should not steal focus when told by another application to open a link
I just wanted to say I found the comments in this (old) bug so very helpful. I am one on the opposite camp, though ... I do want Firefox to open and display the links I click on in other apps. And, I know it did used to work that way ... not sure when it changed. Fortunately, I use compiz and (after reading the comments in this bug) found Focus Prevention Level was set to low. I changed it to off and once again, pages displayed when I click on their link! So, while not a fix for original complaint, I really appreciate the comments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272171 Title: Firefox should not steal focus when told by another application to open a link To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubufox/+bug/272171/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899333] [NEW] Terminal=true does not work in Shortcut Group
Public bug reported: I've tried to make a launcher for Unity, whose purpose is to have several options to execute some particular .sh file. Some those .sh files need a terminal and some do not. But, I have found that for a Shortcut group Terminal=true seems to have no effect. Here's a simplified case to reproduce. For demonstrtaion you could likely use an echo hello world type sh file, but after having trouble with my real world case, I used the sh script in http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-1706383.html My own .sh files are long and complicated and have other prereqs. So, I put the script in my ~/bin directory, named textmenu.sh and created a desktop file named textmenu.desktop which I later drag and drop on the launcher. The contents of the .desktop file (for demonstration) is [Desktop Entry] Name=Utility Menu Exec=textmenu.sh Icon=/usr/share/icons/Humanity/apps/48/administration.svg Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true X-Ayatana-Desktop-Shortcuts=one; [one Shortcut Group] Name=one Exec=textmenu.sh Icon=/usr/share/icons/Humanity/apps/48/administration.svg Terminal=true Type=Application StartupNotify=true Once in launcher, the first item Utility Menu does open a terminal (and shows results of .sh file). The second item, the Shortcut Group named one, does _not_ open a terminal. From my real world example, those shortcuts would still execute and the applications still be visible (its a full Eclipse app) but, no terminal to view debug output, etc. One work around is to use something like Exec=gnome-terminal -x testmenu.sh ... but, in my real world example, there's other complications whether to show the terminal or not so to always force a gnome-terminal in the short cut seems like the wrong place to put the logic. I have not tried this on earlier versions of launcher. Current system info: $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 $ apt-cache policy unity unity: Installed: 4.24.0-0ubuntu2b1 Candidate: 4.24.0-0ubuntu2b1 Version table: *** 4.24.0-0ubuntu2b1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 4.22.0-0ubuntu3 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64 Packages I hope you find this bug report useful. ** Affects: unity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899333 Title: Terminal=true does not work in Shortcut Group To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/899333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 783155] Re: Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library
Comment #21 is really good news. I hope these means this fix will trickle own to future releases (or maintenance?) of Ubuntu. I tried installing just those two packages on my Natty based system, and it indeed fixed the problems I was seeing. To be exact, I only routinely run one 32 bit app on my 64 bit machine, agnclient, and with these new ia32 libs I can now see the client dialog. Previously its contents were barely visible with wrong (or, no) graphics showing up as intended. Its still not perfect, but hopefully rest will be improved as changes flow downstream. There are now (on my patched together system) messages about Gtk-Message: Failed to load module canberra-gtk-module: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libcanberra-gtk-module.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS64 (eclipse:7230): Gtk-WARNING **: /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libclearlooks.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS6 Not sure of what effect those warnings/messages are having, but it is refreshing just to be able to easily see that little dialog again, to confirm I am connected to the internet ... without squinting and getting my screen angled just right :) So, helpful as well as hopeful news :) Thanks. [To be clear, I am not suggesting anyone install those new libs on production or stability-required Natty machines (could have side effects or break something else, as far as I know) ... I am just saying I appreciate the information ... and hoping there will be some indication if/when these fixed packages might show up in future versions of Ubuntu. Thanks again.] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783155 Title: Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/783155/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 703995] Re: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Brian, Thanks for the follow up. I think you can close this bug as not reproducible. It was a one time thing for me and I've just run 'sudo service apport start force_start=1' and updated the system without any problems. I'd rather not re-install from disk in order to try the update again (which likely would bump me straight to current releases rather than whatever was current when this problem occurred). If this is something other have reported and it would really be helpful for me to give that re-install a try, I could be talked into it but couldn't try it for a while. Again, thank you for the response and the explanation. -David On 07/13/2011 12:16 AM, Brian Murray wrote: Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Reviewing your log files attached to this bug report it seems that a package failed to install due to a segmentation fault in application being used by the package installation process. Unfortunately, this bug report isn't very useful in its current state and a crash report would be much more useful. Could you try recreating this issue by enabling apport to catch the crash report 'sudo service apport start force_start=1' and then trying to install the same package again? This process will create a new bug report so I am marking this one as Invalid. Thanks again for helping out! ** Changed in: perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Tags added: package-install-segfault - -- ___ GPG (http://www.gnupg.org/) key available from: http://www.kayakero.net/per/david/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk4eSdoACgkQCzuSgviBh01zAQCfcyr6EW4mxyC2jJEHzyZdyrEG d/8An2kk4ZEZ/Xq5H2pU4NAeO5axtL7T =Hojp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703995 Title: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/+bug/703995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703995] [NEW] package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apparmor Just after initial install (10.04 LTS), when I went to fully update the system, I got that error. davewill@robert1:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 It's an old Dell desktop that has had odd harware issues in the past; I had just replaced Fedora 12 with Ubuntu. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-27.49-generic 2.6.32.26+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-27-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sun Jan 16 16:14:51 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release i386 (20100816.1) ProcKernelCmdline: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-27-generic root=/dev/mapper/vg_hostname-LogVol00 ro quiet splash SourcePackage: apparmor Title: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) ** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703995 Title: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703995] Re: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault)
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703995 Title: package apparmor 2.5.1-0ubuntu0.10.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script killed by signal (Segmentation fault) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 691130] Re: PDF workflow flawed, crashes printers
George asked me to look at this spoolfile. Beyond the custom page size, here is a little more information: 1. This print job was prepared with a PPD file for a Panasonic printer and so contains PS code specific to that device - it will cause an error on other devices (such as a Ricoh or maybe even another Panasonic). Posters in this thread mentioned the DP-C265, searching for some of the ProcSet names online returned DP-C405, they seem to be in the same product line. It would be nice to know for sure that the printer and PPD were properly matched, in order to eliminate that possibility. 2. This print job appears to have different settings for the same parameter; now, that's ok in theory, because the last setting simply replaces the previous setting, but it does indicate a potentially confused workflow. line 461..Duplex set to false line 3239Duplex set to true line 598..PageSize set to 595 x 842 (that's A4) line 3239PageSize set to 210 x 332 (custom page size, a little bigger than A7) line 3245PageSize set to 210 x 332 (again! Indicates possible multiple upstream sources for page settings) 3. There is a ProcSet for XPDF at the beginning of the file - I guess this open-source code was used to convert PDF - PS - the procedure pdfSetup defined there is called on line 3239 and sets Duplex, ImagingBBox and PageSize after all other setup commands have executed, including separate commands for all three of those parameters. These parameters can have a significant effect on printer memory when changed, because a big chunk must be allocated for the frame buffer (raster memory) and the size depends on the page size and duplex setting (and resolution, and margins,...). In the case of this print file, the printer is forced to re-allocate memory several times before it even starts to draw anything. Some posts in this thread mentioned strange behavior, ghostly crashes and long print times, this all sounds a bit like a case of trashed memory, doesn't it? It was also mentioned that the duplex setting makes a difference in this case - and duplex is being set by this pdfSetup procedure - so it's all very suspicious. 4. When I remove all the Panasonic-specific feature settings and that dang pdfSetup call, this file prints very quickly (less than 30 sec.) on a Ricoh MP C2800, a relatively old and slow printer. So all of the trouble is in the setup process, which is basically an interaction between the driver and the PPD file. 5. Finally, about that PageSize setting of 210 x 332. When Acrobat is asked to print a custom page size like that, it makes that size a clipping path rectangle on a standard paper size the printer supports, such as A4 or Letter. This job is actually asking the hardware to set up a physical page size like that - something the paper path in the printer doesn't support, who knows what happens. -David -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/691130 Title: PDF workflow flawed, crashes printers -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
