[Bug 1714988] [NEW] Stuck at 100% CPU in mainloop
Public bug reported: There's an issue where pen gets stuck in a loop and does nothing useful at all, it's been fixed in 0.32.0-2. Could you please update the package for xenial. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=819981 ** Affects: pen (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1714988 Title: Stuck at 100% CPU in mainloop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pen/+bug/1714988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
And yes, unfortunately I'm dualbooting Windows Server for other experiments. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/sda pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 (initramfs) dmraid -s -cr /dev/sda ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdd ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdc ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 [1/2] on /dev/sdb ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 [1/2] on /dev/sda ERROR: either the required RAID set not found or more options required no raid sets and with names: /dev/sda (initramfs) dmraid -s -cr pdc_ebdeeaiceb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1202955] [NEW] (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
Public bug reported: I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation. After the install, I have the exact same problem, I'm always dropped into the busybox initramfs shell, write dmraid -ay to activate the raid, and exit, and boot continues as normal. I've solved my problem by adding the line [ -x /sbin/dmraid ] /sbin/dmraid -ay to the end of the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts /local-top/dmraid as suggested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/247027/comments/21 But I'm guessing there's a more sophisticated procedure that's not kicking in on my system. What information can I start providing to help get this fixed? (If there's a ubuntu developer interested, I can provide access directly to the box via the ilo device.) (initramfs) blkid (initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d] /dev/sda: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdb: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdc: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdd: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid Without any parameters blkid doesn't return anything. (initramfs) dmraid -ay RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb2 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb3 was activated I'm filing it under linux-lts-quantal, since it's the highest level package (I think) that is affected by the underlying problem. And I'm told it's not related to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874 linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic #57 precise1 (amd64) dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu8 ** Affects: linux-lts-quantal (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) dmraid-activate sda ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdd ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 [1/2] on /dev/sdc ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 [1/2] on /dev/sdb ERROR: pdc: wrong # of devices in RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 [1/2] on /dev/sda ERROR: either the required RAID set not found or more options required no raid sets and with names: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) dmraid -s -si *** Superset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb size: 1953124864 stride: 128 type: raid10 status: ok subsets: 2 devs: 4 spares: 0 -- Subset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 size: 1953124864 stride: 128 type: stripe status: ok subsets: 0 devs: 2 spares: 0 -- Subset name: pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 size: 1953124864 stride: 128 type: stripe status: ok subsets: 0 devs: 2 spares: 0 (initramfs) dmraid -s -si -ct raid10 stripe stripe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
I think I've traced it down to a problem with the logic in dmraid- activate Raid_Name=$(dmraid -i -r -cr /dev/$Node_Name | grep -vi No RAID disks | grep -vi formats discovered) activate_array $Raid_Name Here it tries to activate a subset of a raid10. (pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0, pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1) when it probably should try to activate the superset pdc_ebdeeaiceb I solved my problem replacing the line with this Raid_Name=$(dmraid -s -cr) And now it boots! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-lts-quantal/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1202955] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
** Also affects: dmraid Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202955 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dmraid/+bug/1202955/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation. After the install, I have the exact same problem, I'm always dropped into the busybox initramfs shell, write dmraid -ay to activate the raid, and exit, and boot continues as normal. I've solved my problem by adding the line [ -x /sbin/dmraid ] /sbin/dmraid -ay to the end of the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts /local-top/dmraid as suggested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/247027/comments/21 But I'm guessing there's a more sophisticated procedure that's not kicking in on my system. What information can I start providing to help get this fixed? (If there's a ubuntu developer interested, I can provide access directly to the box via the ilo device.) linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic #57 precise1 (amd64) dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) dmraid -ay RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb2 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb3 was activated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) blkid (initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d] /dev/sda: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdb: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdc: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdd: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid Without any parameters blkid doesn't return anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
I've just installed a HP Microserver (N40L) with the latest installer from precise-updates/main/installer-amd64/20101020ubuntu136.9/images /quantal-netboot. The installer fails to activate the raid, so I had to drop into a shell, write dmraid -ay, to continue the installation. After the install, I have the exact same problem, I'm always dropped into the busybox initramfs shell, write dmraid -ay to activate the raid, and exit, and boot continues as normal. I've solved my problem by adding the line [ -x /sbin/dmraid ] /sbin/dmraid -ay to the end of the /usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts /local-top/dmraid as suggested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/247027/comments/21 But I'm guessing there's a more sophisticated procedure that's not kicking in on my system. What information can I start providing to help get this fixed? (If there's a ubuntu developer interested, I can provide access directly to the box via the ilo device.) linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic #57 precise1 (amd64) dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-4.1ubuntu8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) dmraid -ay RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-0 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb-1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb1 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb2 was activated RAID set pdc_ebdeeaiceb3 was activated -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 941874] Re: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot
(initramfs) blkid (initramfs) blkid -p /dev/sd[a-d] /dev/sda: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdb: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdc: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid /dev/sdd: TYPE=promise_fasttrack_raid_member USAGE=raid Without any parameters blkid doesn't return anything. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/941874 Title: (fakeraid) root device not activated during boot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/941874/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
I just completed my second round of testing, all with a separate /var partition; Tested: 1. netboot install of precise. Could not install, problems installing linux-generic package at end of installation. (also tried linux-server, and linux-image-generic) Installation is done via ttyS0, so did not have access to tty4 to check log files. 2. netboot install of oneiric. Installed, bonding configuration did not work. Linux s6 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 20 17:23:00 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 3. upgraded to oneiric-proposed bonding configuration still not working. Linux s6 3.0.0-16-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jan 27 17:44:39 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 4. do-release-upgrade -d upgraded from oneiric-proposed to precise. bonding configuration IS working! Linux s6 3.2.0-12-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Jan 31 18:48:57 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux If there's an (easy) way to downgrade packages in incremental releases, I'm willing to give that a go, see if I can track point of failure down. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
2. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1 3. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1.1 4. ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu5 (works!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
** Also affects: upstart Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
Works on Natty amd64 2.6.38-13-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP with ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-15ubuntu2.11.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
Fun fact: On a fresh install of natty with working bonding configuration, do-release-upgrade renders the system with a separate /var partition, without working networking once it boots to oneiric. Oneiric amd64, 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP ifenslave-2.6 1.1.0-19ubuntu1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] [NEW] network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
Public bug reported: I believe there are benefits of having a separate /var partition, unfortunately having bonding-configured network start up with the OS is not one of them. Or atleast not in a timely fashion. I've done this experiment on two identical hp bl460c g1 blades, only difference was the partitioning scheme. Here's the identical /etc/network/interfaces # The loopback network interface auto lo iface lo inet loopback # The badass network interface auto bond0 iface bond0 inet dhcp bond-slaves none bond-mode 1 bond-miimon 100 # The primary network interface auto eth0 iface eth0 inet manual bond-master bond0 bond-primary eth0 eth1 # The secondary network interface auto eth1 iface eth1 inet manual bond-master bond0 bond-primary eth0 eth1 --- System 1 (all in one /) user@s6:~$ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 1040 71652960 cciss/c0d0 1041 498688 cciss/c0d0p1 # /boot 10423906560 cciss/c0d0p2 # swap 1043 67246080 cciss/c0d0p3 # / dmesg snippet [ 14.193012] bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011) [ 14.193018] bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target [ 14.199096] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth0. [ 14.200677] bnx2 :03:00.0: irq 42 for MSI/MSI-X [ 14.221628] bonding: bond0: Setting MII monitoring interval to 100. [ 14.272860] bnx2 :03:00.0: eth0: using MSI [ 14.274190] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth0 as an active interface with a down [ 14.275050] bonding: bond0: setting mode to active-backup (1). [ 14.277050] bonding: bond0: Setting eth0 as primary slave. [ 14.277407] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth1. [ 14.280579] bnx2 :07:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [ 14.309899] bnx2 :03:00.0: eth0: NIC SerDes Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full du [ 14.364853] bnx2 :07:00.0: eth1: using MSI [ 14.366436] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth1 as a backup interface with a down [ 14.368132] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): bond0: link is not ready [ 14.368148] bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 100 [ 14.368155] bonding: bond0: making interface eth0 the new active one. [ 14.368194] bonding: bond0: first active interface up! [ 14.371073] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready [ 14.371573] bonding: bond0: Setting eth0 as primary slave. --- System 2 (separate /var) user@s7:~$ cat /proc/partitions major minor #blocks name 1040 71652960 cciss/c0d0 1041 498688 cciss/c0d0p1 # /boot 10427812096 cciss/c0d0p2 # / 10433906560 cciss/c0d0p3 # swap 1044 59433984 cciss/c0d0p4 # /var dmesg snippet [ 10.292235] bonding: Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011) [ 10.292241] bonding: Warning: either miimon or arp_interval and arp_ip_target [ 10.295027] bonding: bond0: Setting MII monitoring interval to 100. [ 10.297930] bonding: bond0: setting mode to active-backup (1). [ 372.551921] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth0. [ 372.553329] bnx2 :03:00.0: irq 42 for MSI/MSI-X [ 372.640011] bnx2 :03:00.0: eth0: using MSI [ 372.641288] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth0 as a backup interface with a down [ 372.646658] bonding: bond0: Setting eth0 as primary slave. [ 372.662081] bnx2 :03:00.0: eth0: NIC SerDes Link is Up, 1000 Mbps full du [ 372.696026] bonding: bond0: link status definitely up for interface eth0, 100 [ 372.696033] bonding: bond0: making interface eth0 the new active one. [ 372.696087] bonding: bond0: first active interface up! [ 372.697349] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): bond0: link becomes ready [ 372.730648] bonding: bond0: Adding slave eth1. [ 372.733831] bnx2 :07:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [ 372.832014] bnx2 :07:00.0: eth1: using MSI [ 372.833286] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth1 as a backup interface with a down [ 372.837525] bonding: bond0: Setting eth0 as primary slave. ** Affects: ifenslave-2.6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: bonding partition -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 924513] Re: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition
This was tested on Oneiric amd64 3.0.0-15-generic #26-Ubuntu SMP and oneiric-proposed 3.0.0-15-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924513 Title: network with bonding does not start on ubuntu with separate /var partition To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/924513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713805] [NEW] type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: aptdaemon
Downloaded opera 11.01 package.
db-click to install.
type administrative password for installation.
crash.
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: aptdaemon 0.40+bzr541-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-1.28-generic 2.6.38-rc2
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-1-generic x86_64
Annotation: Installation of the package file failed
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Feb 5 22:05:36 2011
DesktopFile: /usr/share/aptdaemon/aptdaemon.desktop
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/aptd
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: aptdaemon
Title: type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
TransactionDepends: [[], [], [], [], [], [], []]
TransactionKwargs: {'path':
dbus.String(u'/home/anoncow/Downloads/opera_11.01.1190_amd64.deb'), 'force':
dbus.Boolean(False)}
TransactionLocale: en_US.UTF8
TransactionPackages: [[], [], [], [], [], []]
TransactionRole: role-install-file
** Affects: aptdaemon (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-crash natty
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713805
Title:
type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support
item assignment
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 713805] Re: type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713805 Title: type 'exceptions.TypeError': 'dbus.Struct' object does not support item assignment -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663987] [NEW] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#x stuck for 61s!
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.32-25-generic Ok, so this is probably my own fault. But it says BUG, so I'll report it anyway. [12276.094371] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#7 stuck for 61s! [udevd:17459] [12276.094376] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_emc fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor vga16fb vgastate joydev usbhid usb_storage radeon hid ttm drm_kms_helper i5000_edac drm i2c_algo_bit dell_wmi dcdbas edac_core i5k_amb psmouse ioatdma serio_raw dca bnx2 shpchp lp parport ses enclosure qla2xxx scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas scsi_tgt [12276.094376] CPU 7: [12276.094376] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_emc fbcon tileblit font bitblit softcursor vga16fb vgastate joydev usbhid usb_storage radeon hid ttm drm_kms_helper i5000_edac drm i2c_algo_bit dell_wmi dcdbas edac_core i5k_amb psmouse ioatdma serio_raw dca bnx2 shpchp lp parport ses enclosure qla2xxx scsi_transport_fc megaraid_sas scsi_tgt [12276.094376] Pid: 17459, comm: udevd Tainted: G D2.6.32-25-generic #45-Ubuntu PowerEdge 1950 [12276.094376] RIP: 0010:[81038734] [81038734] __ticket_spin_lock+0x14/0x20 [12276.094376] RSP: 0018:8801294c1ca0 EFLAGS: 0293 [12276.094376] RAX: fbf8 RBX: 8801294c1ca0 RCX: 88006189f0c0 [12276.094376] RDX: 88006189f0c0 RSI: 88006189f0c0 RDI: 817b45c0 [12276.094376] RBP: 81012cae R08: R09: 880129f60300 [12276.094376] R10: 88012b512600 R11: 0002 R12: 8801294c1d08 [12276.094376] R13: 0004 R14: 0004811583ff R15: 880037709005 [12276.094376] FS: 7f0bd7f397a0() GS:8800283c() knlGS: [12276.094376] CS: 0010 DS: ES: CR0: 8005003b [12276.094376] CR2: 7f0bd7f591e2 CR3: 0001267a4000 CR4: 06e0 [12276.094376] DR0: DR1: DR2: [12276.094376] DR3: DR6: 0ff0 DR7: 0400 [12276.094376] Call Trace: [12276.094376] [81543a82] ? lock_kernel+0x22/0x40 [12276.094376] [81327824] ? memory_open+0x24/0xa0 [12276.094376] [81146d1a] ? chrdev_open+0x13a/0x240 [12276.094376] [8115ec70] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110 [12276.094376] [81146be0] ? chrdev_open+0x0/0x240 [12276.094376] [81141023] ? __dentry_open+0x113/0x370 [12276.094376] [8125323f] ? security_inode_permission+0x1f/0x30 [12276.094376] [8114d3bf] ? inode_permission+0xaf/0xd0 [12276.094376] [81141397] ? nameidata_to_filp+0x57/0x70 [12276.094376] [811515fa] ? do_filp_open+0x2da/0xba0 [12276.094376] [81543cf5] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30 [12276.094376] [812bd4eb] ? strncpy_from_user+0x5b/0x90 [12276.094376] [8115d17a] ? alloc_fd+0x10a/0x150 [12276.094376] [81140d99] ? do_sys_open+0x69/0x170 [12276.094376] [81140ee0] ? sys_open+0x20/0x30 [12276.094376] [810121b2] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Hardware: Dell PowerEdge 1950 with 2 x QLogic ISP2432 Fibre Channel HBA, EMC CLARiiON AX150. Software: multipath-tools, qla-tools r...@quimby:/# ql-dynamic-tgt-lun-disc --scan --refresh ERROR: SG3 Utility not found Unable to determine devices to be refreshed. Would you like to explicitly remove all the devices and rescan ? Note: This may make the system un-usable if the system is using any of the devices attached to the QLogic HBAs Proceed? (yes/no): yes Scanning HOST: host3 Scanning HOST: host4 ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU#x stuck for 61s! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520386] Re: libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge
Will a newer version end up in backports, or is the quick fix getting it from maverick? -- libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libvirt in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 520386] Re: libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge
Will a newer version end up in backports, or is the quick fix getting it from maverick? -- libvirt-bin hypervisor does not support virConnectNumOfInterfaces / unable to create domain with virt-manager using network bridge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 566673] Re: Installation detects neither wired Attansic interface nor wireless Broadcom interface
Can't netboot with Atheros AR8132 / L1c Gigabit Ethernet Adapter (rev c0) either on Asus 1001 HA. -- Installation detects neither wired Attansic interface nor wireless Broadcom interface https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566673 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520700] [NEW] (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eog This is probably due to a library eog uses. This will also prevents certain configurations* of nautilus (*those with thumbnailing) from accessing the folder where such an image is contained. Nautilus will also crash/assert/segfault when attempting to thumbnail image. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Feb 11 22:58:47 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: eog 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash LC_PAPER=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-19.56-generic SourcePackage: eog Uname: Linux 2.6.31-19-generic x86_64 XsessionErrors: (gnome-settings-daemon:30349): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-settings-daemon:30349): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_propagate_error: assertion `src != NULL' failed (nautilus:30381): Eel-CRITICAL **: eel_preferences_get_boolean: assertion `preferences_is_initialized ()' failed (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:30398): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: eog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076083/Dependencies.txt -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed
** Attachment added: Image that fails assertion. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076112/COLONY.PIK.tga -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520700] Re: (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed
You'll have to excuse all the crap irrelevant text that came with the apport-bug report, I didn't immediately spot a way to file a bug without using ubuntu-bug. And it apparently wouldn't take the core file as a parameter. The assertion in the summary gives a a great hint as to what's wrong. Just download the image provided int the comments, and you'll be able to reproduce it in an instant. -- (eog:990): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: try_colormap: assertion `ctx-cmap_size 0' failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520700 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520717] [NEW] Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus I first noticed nautilus dissapearing when opening a folder containing that image. Then I noticed eog crashing when trying to open/view the image. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: eog gdkpixbuf nautilus -- Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520717 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520717] Re: Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image.
** Attachment added: Corrupting image. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39076603/COLONY.PIK.tga -- Nautilus crashes/asserts/segfaults on folder containing a bad image. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520717 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
Related bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/139234 same type of marvell sata 6145 controller. -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139234] Re: Marvell SATA controller not recognized
Is this during the ubuntu-installer, or on an installed system? And which version of Linux kernel is running? (I have the 6145 controller aswell, doesn't work during the install, but works on an installed system with the 2.6.24 kernel.) See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/196283 -- Marvell SATA controller not recognized https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201049] Re: hard disk not found
The 20080306 i386 build is broken. Having same issues here. Try a newer version, 20080311 is out. -- hard disk not found https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201049 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
Using the files {linux,initrd.gz}, dated 2008.03.04, from
ftp://ftp.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/hardy/main/installer-i386/current/images/netboot/ubuntu-installer/i386/
None of my disks show up.
I don't have a cd-rom, so i'm not able to test normal/alternate cd-
releases. It needs to be done via pxe.
** Attachment added: Seriously broken installer
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12543987/dmesg.txt
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: seriously broken installer (lsmod) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544007/lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: seriously broken installer (lspci) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12544015/lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
uname -a Linux mj 2.6.24-11-generic #1 SMP Fri Feb 29 22:08:31 UTC 2008 i686 unknown -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Description changed:
1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy
2) netboot.tar.gz ?
3) 2008.02.26
- 4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install.
5)
- 1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will
detect the disks.
- The other 19 times, they are not detected.
+ 1 in every 20 or so boots the installer will detect the disks. The other 19
times, they are not detected.
- So I've actually managed to install on the disks previously. Under
- linux-2.6.24 they work as normal, this problem seems to arise whenever
- using the ubuntu-installer. Though I previously had the same symptoms
- when running linux-2.6.2{2,3} (tweaking bios, etc).
+ This means I've actually managed to install hardy on the disks
+ previously (by randomly changing bios settings). On my installed system,
+ running the linux-2.6.24 kernel they work as normal. The problem seems
+ to arise whenever using the hardy-installer. Though I previously had the
+ same symptoms on an installed system running (custom) linux-2.6.2{2,3}
+ kernels.
Included for your viewing pleasure; dmesg, lsmod, lspci from the
installer, and from an installed system.
+
+ keywords for other searchers with similar problems:
+ Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88SE6145 SATA II PCI-E controller (rev a1)
Unknown device 8220
+ ASUSTeK Computer Inc. P5WDG2 WS Professional
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installer dmesg (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264294/installer-dmesg.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installer lspci (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264297/installer-lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installer lsmod (not working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264295/installer-lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installed system lspci (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264282/mj-lspci.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installed system lsmod (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264277/mj-lsmod.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] [NEW] netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
Public bug reported:
1) Ubuntu 8.04 hardy
2) netboot.tar.gz ?
3) 2008.02.26
4) Detect all my disks, allow me to partition them, and install.
5)
1 in every 20 boots, if i randomly tweak around with bios settings, it will
detect the disks.
The other 19 times, they are not detected.
So I've actually managed to install on the disks previously. Under
linux-2.6.24 they work as normal, this problem seems to arise whenever
using the ubuntu-installer. Though I previously had the same symptoms
when running linux-2.6.2{2,3} (tweaking bios, etc).
Included for your viewing pleasure; dmesg, lsmod, lspci from the
installer, and from an installed system.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 196283] Re: netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected.
** Attachment added: installed system dmesg (working) http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12264275/mj-dmesg.txt -- netboot hardy installer marvell sata disks not detected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196283 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131577] Re: [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty)
taken directly from config-2.6.22-generic # CONFIG_SND_HDA_INTEL is not set Which explains why the module was not present in my custom kernel either. Once I compiled it, I got sound. -- [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 131577] Re: [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty)
Here's my output, using libata-dev kernel compiled with config-2.6.22-12-generic options. (I too have no sound, but snd-hda-intel is not in modules.) Linux mj 2.6.23-rc8 #1 SMP Wed Sep 26 02:21:06 CEST 2007 i686 GNU/Linux 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 82801G (ICH7 Family) High Definition Audio Controller [8086:27d8] (rev 01) Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:81f6] Control: I/O- Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast TAbort- TAbort- MAbort- SERR- PERR- Latency: 0, Cache Line Size: 16 bytes Interrupt: pin A routed to IRQ 5 Region 0: Memory at ffafc000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Flags: PMEClk- DSI- D1- D2- AuxCurrent=55mA PME(D0+,D1-,D2-,D3hot+,D3cold+) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME- Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: Mask- 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Address: Data: Capabilities: [70] Express Unknown type IRQ 0 Device: Supported: MaxPayload 128 bytes, PhantFunc 0, ExtTag- Device: Latency L0s 64ns, L1 1us Device: Errors: Correctable- Non-Fatal- Fatal- Unsupported- Device: RlxdOrd- ExtTag- PhantFunc- AuxPwr- NoSnoop+ Device: MaxPayload 128 bytes, MaxReadReq 128 bytes Link: Supported Speed unknown, Width x0, ASPM unknown, Port 0 Link: Latency L0s 64ns, L1 1us Link: ASPM Disabled CommClk- ExtSynch- Link: Speed unknown, Width x0 -- [gutsy] No sound devices loaded for ICH7 Intel High Definition Audio Controller (which working fine in feisty) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97655] Re: dmraid45 target please
** Also affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- dmraid45 target please https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97655 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 71172] openoffice-writer dependency in base-install
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ubuntu-base sarcasmSomeone decided that it would be funny to have a package in base to depend on openoffice-writer./sarcasm So after a netboot installation. I've got your basic commandline linux, with no xserver, no windowmanager, yet somehow openoffice-writer found it's way into my install. ** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- openoffice-writer dependency in base-install https://launchpad.net/bugs/71172 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60442] Re: Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug)
Yep. This wasn't an issue in dapper with the older g-p-m. It's all g-p-m's fault. g-p-m sees both my batteries, and calculates the total time and total charge, but shuts down on one empty battery. -- Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. (GPM does not recognises second battery on hotplug) https://launchpad.net/bugs/60442 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60826] pcspkr isn't default in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
Public bug reported: I'm sitting, listening to music, wearing earbuds. Suddenly a system beep comes along. BEEP! It apparently does not care about my volume settings. I should sue someone for temporary and possibly permanent hearing loss. On a slightly more serious note though; Come on... It's an annoyance for over 90% of the users out there. We don't care if we press backspace or tab once more than required. Stop BEEPing us. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- pcspkr isn't default in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist https://launchpad.net/bugs/60826 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 60442] Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Have two fully charged batteries on your laptop. Let the expansion battery on your laptop run out of power. Watch your laptop power down with still 50% charge left. Ubuntu Edgy: IBM Thinkpad X40. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager Have two fully charged batteries on your laptop. Let the expansion battery on your laptop run out of power. Watch your laptop power down with still 50% charge left. - IBM Thinkpad X40. + Ubuntu Edgy: IBM Thinkpad X40. ** Tags added: battery edgy gnome-power-manager shutdown -- Dual / Two Batteries, shutdown on empty expansion battery. https://launchpad.net/bugs/60442 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
