[Bug 1844806] Re: kernel panic after upgrading from 19.04 to 19.10
thanks for the hints. I tried the workaround of disabling secure boot and it did not panic and the system started. But I would like to keep secure boot enabled, note that booting 19.10 with the Kernel linux-image-5.0.0-29-generic from 19.04 works properly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844806 Title: kernel panic after upgrading from 19.04 to 19.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844806/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1844806] Re: kernel panic after upgrading from 19.04 to 19.10
+1, same issue here after upgrading from 19.04 to 19.10 (development). This is the same spec machine that is listed above: Thinkpad X1 Carbon 7 gen. note: Kernel panic is before the system asks for SSD password. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844806 Title: kernel panic after upgrading from 19.04 to 19.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844806/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1687246] Re: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling
+1, using Ubuntu 18.04-beta here and it's not there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1687246 Title: GNOME Shell should support fractional (non-integer) Hi-DPI scaling To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/1687246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1655802] [NEW] package unattended-upgrades 0.90ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 10
Public bug reported: When I turned on my laptop there was this message of the but. Other than that I don't know for sure how I happened. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: unattended-upgrades 0.90ubuntu0.3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-59.80-generic 4.4.35 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-59-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Jan 11 14:51:29 2017 ErrorMessage: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 10 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-09-25 (108 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719) PackageArchitecture: all RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1 apt 1.2.15ubuntu0.2 SourcePackage: unattended-upgrades Title: package unattended-upgrades 0.90ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 10 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1655802 Title: package unattended-upgrades 0.90ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/1655802/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 364871] [NEW] python version mismatch
Public bug reported: Trying ubuntu sugar packages, gave an error. The reason for that error is as told at http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/729#comment:3 : Looks like the Ubuntu package python-hulahop still contains Python 2.5 modules, but Python 2.6 is default in Jaunty. = upstream bug. ** Affects: hulahop Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: sugar-hulahop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: SugarLabs #729 http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/729 ** Also affects: hulahop via http://dev.sugarlabs.org/ticket/729 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- python version mismatch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364871 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295113] Re: Network Manager 0.7 support
I'm using an updated Ubuntu Intrepid, and using Intrepid sugar packages, and still don't see any AP's in the neighborhood. Could it be because I use the bcm43 chipset which I use with ndiswrapper? ** Attachment added: presenceservice log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22833606/presenceservice.log -- Network Manager 0.7 support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295113 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 306909] [NEW] Missed pstat package
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: python2.5
Clarification:
When trying to use the cProfile package and invoking the run method
the pstat package required is not found
Verification, try the following python code
import cProfile
def test():
pass
cProfile.run('test()')
We got the error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File prof.py, line 6, in module
cProfile.run('test()')
File /usr/lib/python2.5/cProfile.py, line 36, in run
result = prof.print_stats(sort)
File /usr/lib/python2.5/cProfile.py, line 80, in print_stats
import pstats
ImportError: No module named pstats
pstats is not found under /usr/lib/python2.5/
it needs to be provided with cProfile.
** Affects: python2.5 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Missed pstat package
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/306909
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 152808] Re: g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
I got your point but if we're talking about Linux for human beings I don't think that gconf is a solution, old linux users know how to fix it or give an special option, but would be good make the things a bit easy for the other ones... not all laptops are so faster... Ed.- On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Chris Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like my laptop to not run at full speed (ie full temperature) when it's just sitting on the desk not being used. ondemand brings in the performance when it is needed, so why change the default? (also note that this is a gconf setting, so you can choose to override the default as you wish) -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 152808] Re: g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
I think leaving it at ondemand is the solution. It will switch to full performance when the system is busy, so users will get the performance they expect from their hardware. Anyone who actually wants to change it will already know what cpu scaling is and won't be scared of gconf, surely? I agree with that, my point is about people that don't know about cpu scaling... my laptop is a 1.2ghz pentium m, so it's hardly the fastest thing in the world, but I don't think there would be any benefit to not using ondemand. It's not going to make the thing noticeably faster. Can you demonstrate otherwise? I open this bug because I feel that ondemand doesn't works as well as I would like, it makes me feel my laptop a little slower... your laptop is working properly, that's not my case... maybe will be useful some feedback from another users. Here we have two points of view for two different cases/machines... Maybe my problem is an isolated one, maybe not... is there any forum where we can talk about this ?, more opinions would be very useful. Ed.- -- Chris Jones -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 152808] Re: g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
Another comments: if the computer is on the desk and don't being used, is the CPU being used? , is there any big difference between ondemand and performance on that case? IIRC CPU scaling helps to save the battery life on the laptop cases, but if I'm plugged to AC I would like to have my laptop working as fast as possible. Final user needs to feel their laptop faster as they want, this makes sense to me: case 1: laptop plugged (AC) = use performance (we don't need to save anything) case 2: laptop using battery as power resource = use ondemand let's ask to the users... this is not a problem for geeks... On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 10:05 AM, Eduardo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think leaving it at ondemand is the solution. It will switch to full performance when the system is busy, so users will get the performance they expect from their hardware. Anyone who actually wants to change it will already know what cpu scaling is and won't be scared of gconf, surely? I agree with that, my point is about people that don't know about cpu scaling... my laptop is a 1.2ghz pentium m, so it's hardly the fastest thing in the world, but I don't think there would be any benefit to not using ondemand. It's not going to make the thing noticeably faster. Can you demonstrate otherwise? I open this bug because I feel that ondemand doesn't works as well as I would like, it makes me feel my laptop a little slower... your laptop is working properly, that's not my case... maybe will be useful some feedback from another users. Here we have two points of view for two different cases/machines... Maybe my problem is an isolated one, maybe not... is there any forum where we can talk about this ?, more opinions would be very useful. Ed.- -- Chris Jones -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 152808] Re: g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
If they don't know about it, they won't care about it because ondemand will make their CPU fast when they need it. If they bought a 2.0GHz CPU laptop, ondemand just will going to scale to 2.0 as were necessary, if I'm opening openoffice or something similar, are u sure that ondemand will switch to 2.0 or 1.6 ? , why the user need to experience a slower machine if he's connected to AC ? Ondemand is a good solution for a lot of situations, here we're talking about the 'Laptop connected to AC' case.. I open this bug because I feel that ondemand doesn't works as well as I would like, it makes me feel my laptop a little slower... your Where are the numbers to prove the overhead of ondemand? good question, but is not necessary to spent some time to get numbers to see that our machines are a little slower with ondemand. I think more facts would be useful :) It doesn't make sence to me to set a slower CPU when the laptop is plugged, ondemand is very helpful but my point is performance. I'm just proposing to change the AC policy from ondemand to performance. Plug your laptop to AC and do some test using ondemand v/s performance, which one is more faster ?, which one gives the best user experience ?. Eduardo. -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152808] Re: g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
If we have our AC plugged we would like to use the max performance of our laptop, here' s a very simple patch. ** Attachment added: Fix default Policy http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10049650/fix_default_policy_ac.diff -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152808] g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand'
Public bug reported: The main configuration of g-p-m is to keep the ondemand policy, when the system startup it uses the performance policy, when the user got logged in Gnome, g-p-m set 'ondemand', no matters if AC is plugged. ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- g-p-m always try to set the main policy to 'ondemand' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152808 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140529] inkscape shows wrong stroke weight of a plain svg
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: inkscape I've got a simple plain SVG file, which inside Inkscape shows as having all the strokes the weight of 3.138 px, but editing it with any text editor shows the stroke weights to be 3.5 px. The SVG file can be downloaded from http://dev.laptop.org/attachment/ticket/3482/activity-rgbpaint.svg (this is actually a website, so don't just wget this address :) ) ** Affects: inkscape (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: inkscape svg ** Description changed: Binary package hint: inkscape I've got a simple plain SVG file, which inside Inkscape shows as having all the strokes the weight of 3.138 px, but editing it with any text editor shows the stroke weights to be 3.5 px. The SVG file can be downloaded from - http://dev.laptop.org/attachment/ticket/3482/rgbpaint-activity.svg (this - is actually a website, so don't just wget this address :) ) + https://dev.laptop.org/attachment/ticket/3482/rgbpaint-activity.svg + (this is actually a website, so don't just wget this address :) ) ** Tags added: inkscape svg ** Description changed: Binary package hint: inkscape I've got a simple plain SVG file, which inside Inkscape shows as having all the strokes the weight of 3.138 px, but editing it with any text editor shows the stroke weights to be 3.5 px. The SVG file can be downloaded from - https://dev.laptop.org/attachment/ticket/3482/rgbpaint-activity.svg - (this is actually a website, so don't just wget this address :) ) + http://dev.laptop.org/attachment/ticket/3482/activity-rgbpaint.svg (this + is actually a website, so don't just wget this address :) ) -- inkscape shows wrong stroke weight of a plain svg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140529 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114541] Doesn't install its upgraded initrd.img
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't install a upgraded initrd.img. Download at: http://librarian.launchpad.net/7332812/linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic_2.6.20-15.27_i386.deb I checked the files it will install with gdebi, and notice there should exist initrd.img-2.6.20-15-generic on /boot : boot/ boot/config-2.6.20-15-generic boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-15-generic boot/abi-2.6.20-15-generic boot/System.map-2.6.20-15-generic usr/ usr/share/ [...] ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Doesn't install its upgraded initrd.img https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106864] Re: Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
Could this be the source of the problem? The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't install a upgraded initrd.img http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/114541 -- Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114541] Re: Doesn't contain the upgraded initrd.img
** Summary changed: - Doesn't install its upgraded initrd.img + Doesn't contain the upgraded initrd.img ** Description changed: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic - The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't install a upgraded - initrd.img. + The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't contain a initrd.img. Download at: http://librarian.launchpad.net/7332812/linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic_2.6.20-15.27_i386.deb I checked the files it will install with gdebi, and notice there should exist initrd.img-2.6.20-15-generic on /boot : boot/ boot/config-2.6.20-15-generic boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-15-generic boot/abi-2.6.20-15-generic boot/System.map-2.6.20-15-generic usr/ usr/share/ [...] -- Doesn't contain the upgraded initrd.img https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70917] Re: kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot
Don't want to spam other bug's, but I think the bug I reported could be related to it: The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't contain a initrd.img http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/114541 -- kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70917] Re: kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot
Don't want to spam other bug's, but I think the bug I reported could be related to it: The linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic package doesn't contain a initrd.img http://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-source-2.6.20/+bug/114541 -- kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 114541] Re: Doesn't contain the upgraded initrd.img
Ok, some knowledgable people in #ubuntu told me that initrd.img is regenerated at the installation of a package, and not included in it (makes sense since it will link to modules, etc). ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected -- Doesn't contain the upgraded initrd.img https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114541 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106864] Re: Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem
Please disregard my comment, just learned how inird.img is generated during installation and is not part of any ubuntu package. Also closed my bug. -- Feisty boot fail can't access tty IDE SATA problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70917] Re: kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot
Disregard my comment, just learned how inird.img is generated during installation and is not part of any ubuntu package. Also closed my bug. -- kernel hangs for a few seconds during boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/70917 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70988] In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work
Public bug reported: I upgraded from Dapper to Edgy, and before I could choose in the Page Layout pane to print two pages per paper, and this would work. Now, this option does nothing to the printed document. Also, I tried the Scale option, and it also gets ignored. My printer is HP PSC 1610, using the hpijs driver. ** Affects: gnome-print (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/70988 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70988] Re: In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work
** Summary changed: - In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work + In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work ** Description changed: - I upgraded from Dapper to Edgy, and before I could choose in the Page Layout pane to print two pages per paper, and this would work. - Now, this option does nothing to the printed document. - Also, I tried the Scale option, and it also gets ignored. + I upgraded from Dapper to Edgy, and 2 options don't work in the Page + Layout tab of the Print Dialog: Pages per Sheet, and Scale. No matter + what I choose, these options don't affect the final printing. + + I also can't find a Portrait/Landscape selection in the dialog. I + suspect it should be selectable in Type of Paper, but it is greyed out + with Unavailable text. + + I've tested this in Evince. My printer is HP PSC 1610, using the hpijs driver. -- In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/70988 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70988] Re: In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work
I've just tested this with PDF Printer, and these options are also ignored. -- In new Print Dialog of Edgy Eft, Page Layout options don't work https://launchpad.net/bugs/70988 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
