[Bug 1843819] Re: Volume scaling is incorrect for Logitech H600 (046d:0a29): alsamixer @ 0% where pulse volume @ 50%
I can confirm this exact same behavior. It occurred on my H600, in both Ubuntu 18.10 and 19.04. Makes for very strange volume effects, especially to those who don't know to investigate with pavucontrol and alsamixer. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843819 Title: Volume scaling is incorrect for Logitech H600 (046d:0a29): alsamixer @ 0% where pulse volume @ 50% To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1843819/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1504834] Re: pcsx assert failure: pcsx: ../libpcsxcore/ix86_64/ix86-64.c:158: MEMADDR_OP: Assertion `!isreg || reg != 0' failed.
Same exact issue. Wiped my machine and put 15.10, now this won't run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1504834 Title: pcsx assert failure: pcsx: ../libpcsxcore/ix86_64/ix86-64.c:158: MEMADDR_OP: Assertion `!isreg || reg != 0' failed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcsxr/+bug/1504834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1236479] [NEW] On dual monitor, unmaximizing Evolution windows makes them huge
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit Standard Unity environment Evolution 3.2.3 Dual monitor set up I usually run Evolution maximized on one of my windows. Occasionally I want to un-maximize the window for misc reasons. When I unmaximize the window, it will sometimes get bigger, appearing to be the entire size of both monitors. I am trying to figure out when exactly this happens because it isn't consistently happening. It may be on the first un- maximize attempt of a session, as it didn't happen right now when I tried it. Is there possibly an initialization for Evolution that attempts to set preferred window size to the entire desktop rather than a single monitor? If I can diagnose it further I'll add comments. ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236479 Title: On dual monitor, unmaximizing Evolution windows makes them huge To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/1236479/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1158763] Re: Overlay Scrollbars are not present
I appreciate that workaround, but disabling the overlay scroll bars completely just to get gnumeric to scroll at all seems like more negative than positive. Again, it may be useful for testing and gaining an understanding, but I just want to make sure users understand this will do more than just change Gnumeric itself. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158763 Title: Overlay Scrollbars are not present To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/1158763/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180870] Re: No scroll bars in 13.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1158763 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1158763 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1158763 Overlay Scrollbars are not present -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180870 Title: No scroll bars in 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/1180870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1180870] [NEW] No scroll bars in 13.04
Public bug reported: After upgrading to 13.04, I no longer have scroll bars in gnumeric. I can click and hold and drag around to move, but I don't have any explicit scroll bars to let me move around...quite unusable. Let me know what info I could provide. [~] - uname -a Linux nwel-blur 3.8.0-21-generic #32-Ubuntu SMP Tue May 14 22:16:46 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux [~] - gnumeric -v gnumeric version '1.12.1' datadir := '/usr/share/gnumeric/1.12.1' libdir := '/usr/lib/gnumeric/1.12.1' Not sure if the attached screenshot will help much, but it shows they aren't there anyway! (And they don't show up when you hover, either). Thanks! ** Affects: gnumeric (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Attachment added: Screenshot: no scroll bars (they don't appear when you hover, either) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180870/+attachment/3678375/+files/Screenshot%20from%202013-05-16%2010%3A31%3A40.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1180870 Title: No scroll bars in 13.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnumeric/+bug/1180870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1171027] Re: Unable to play midi files Ubuntu 13.04 Invalid Commandline
At first I didn't notice it was just midi files; I was trying to play an mp3 but my queue had a midi at the top entry, and sure enough it is a midi / gstreamer issue. I installed Ubuntu 13.04 on release day, upgrading from 12.10 using standard procedure. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171027 Title: Unable to play midi files Ubuntu 13.04 Invalid Commandline To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-codec-install/+bug/1171027/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1159961] [NEW] Guake vague command line arguments
Public bug reported: I find some minor issues with the guake command line arguments. I'd like to add an extension to the Nautilus menu to Open in Guake. It is easy enough to try to manipulate guake from a command line, with guake -n appearing to open a new tab, however this seems vague in the usage: -n NEW_TAB, --new-tab=NEW_TAB I've passed arguments to this, but they don't seem to do anything, and not passing an argument fails. In addition, the toggle visibility should have an optional argument that enforces VISIBLE or NOT_VISIBLE instead of just a simple toggle. Alternatively a VISIBLE flag could be exposed which would let my script check whether it is already visible or not. I love guake, and may submit a patch for the above changes, but I wanted to see if anyone had any ideas whether this wouldn't be necessary or not. Thanks! ** Affects: guake (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1159961 Title: Guake vague command line arguments To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guake/+bug/1159961/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008277]
Created attachment 73119 Visualization of Problem I filed this bug originally a while back, and it was marked as invalid. Just today, I noticed that I am still encountering the problem. I am still on Ubuntu, 64-bit. Now I am running 12.10, and LibreOffice is at Version 3.6.2.2 (Build ID: 360m1 (Build:2)) The filenames are still being goofed in the Recent Menu. I have attached an image. For example, I commonly have files named: figure_XYDimensions.png figure_SomethingElse.png In the recent menu, the underscores are gone. And (this may help narrow down the problem) when the recent menu is first shown, the filenames are plain, but as I hover over that menu, the underscores appear as an underline to the letter following their original position. This hints that the underscore is perhaps being interpreted as the shortcut for that menu item. This happens in the core LibreOffice, not just when a single instance (calc, draw, etc.) is open. Let me know if I can provide any further details, I know it isn't a serious issue, but it seems like it may be a simple fix to just *not* process recent file underscores as shortcut identifiers. Thanks!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008277 Title: [upstream] Recent menu botches file names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1008277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008277]
It has been a while since this was opened, but the exact problem is still occurring for me. I have updated my info (versions, etc.) and provided more information of the problem in comment #2, and also uploaded a screenshot of the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008277 Title: [upstream] Recent menu botches file names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1008277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1041175] Re: Overlay scrollbars obscure content in a maximised window
Where is the best place to watch for progress on this, it's a pretty annoying little thing! Thanks!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041175 Title: Overlay scrollbars obscure content in a maximised window To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1041175/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480605] Re: Repeated subscription request from same user
Same for me on 12.10...persistent requests!! Perhaps this person just really wants to talk to me :-D. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480605 Title: Repeated subscription request from same user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/empathy/+bug/480605/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1074778] Re: Upgrading to 12.10 created a ~/fontconfig folder but did not delete it
Same exact thing happened to me, deleting that folder now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1074778 Title: Upgrading to 12.10 created a ~/fontconfig folder but did not delete it To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fontconfig/+bug/1074778/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 928434] Re: update-manager doesn't remember its position on screen
I see this all the time...perhaps every time update manager is opened. I have additional behavior such as the window size is maximized, but it is not positioned properly. Part of the window appears on my secondary monitor, or off-screen, as the case may be. Perhaps this is the same effect as mentioned in previous comments. Another perhaps related issue is that occasionally the update manager window is all white, no widgets or data shown. When I *actually* maximize the window, it is properly refreshed and everything appears properly. Seems all related, but I guess we'll see. I am running 12.04 (64-bit), which was upgraded from 11.10 way back when. I don't believe I saw this behavior back on 11.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/928434 Title: update-manager doesn't remember its position on screen To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/928434/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999977] Re: [rt73usb] WPA2 Authentication Requested Multiple Times
This bug is so annoying! I am running a new dell XPS17, my wife is on a Dell Inspiron something...not new. Often times when we open her computer lid there are dozens of Wireless Network Authorization dialogs piled up on top of each other. To clear them all at one, I just right click on the little wifi icon and click quit, which closes all instances of the dialog. The wireless is still connected. On my XPS, I often see this while I am connected to my LAN at work. Even though I have a fine connection to the internet, these dialogs pop up every few minutes, albeit intermittently. Will attach syslog when it pops up next. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77 Title: [rt73usb] WPA2 Authentication Requested Multiple Times To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/77/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 999977] Re: [rt73usb] WPA2 Authentication Requested Multiple Times
** Attachment added: syslog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/77/+attachment/3369258/+files/syslog -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77 Title: [rt73usb] WPA2 Authentication Requested Multiple Times To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/77/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022935] Re: libpurple0 package description typo
Looks like it should be 8.5. The configure script has a reference to /usr/lib/tcl8.5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022935 Title: libpurple0 package description typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1022935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 988337] Re: two chromium icons on the launcher
This type of thing happens with me as well. I am using Chrome, not Chromium, but it is the same type of behavior. My setup: Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit google-chrome is default browser google-chrome is also default program to open html files google-chrome is locked to launcher To produce: I open google-chrome and browse I then locate an html file on my drive in nautilus and double-click to open it Expected behavior: locked Google chrome icon shows multiple arrows, indicating that multiple windows are now open Actual behavior: A second chrome icon shows up at the bottom of the launcher, which is attached to this html file open instance Ideal behavior: The single chrome instance opens a new tab showing the html output. I realize this is likely possible now, and perhaps just related to calling chrome in a special fashion to indicate it should attach it as a new tab instead of a new instance. But let's just get the new instance thing working first!! :) Additional info: I don't believe I modified any mime or defaults information manually (in the config files) when setting chrome to the default html opener. Though this definitely looks like confusion between desktop files/bamf and google-chrome reporting itself funny when opened from a file. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988337 Title: two chromium icons on the launcher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/988337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1022935] [NEW] libpurple0 package description typo
Public bug reported: 12.04 64-bit: `dpkg -s libpurple0` shows this: Some extra packages are suggested to use increased functionality: * tcl8.4, tk8.4: - Support for writing plugins with Tcl/Tk yet also shows this (this format is from launchpad, but same difference): Suggests: tcl8.5 (= 8.5.0) tk8.5 (= 8.5.0) Thanks! ** Affects: pidgin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022935 Title: libpurple0 package description typo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pidgin/+bug/1022935/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 804943] Re: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path
Yep, still here with new kernel update today -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/804943 Title: blcr kernel module failed to build with kernel 3.0 : configure: error: --with-linux argument '3.0-x' is neither a kernel version string nor a full path To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/804943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1000469] Re: Wont start maximised
I have a similar problem, but not just update-manager. TeXMaker also starts in a maximized size, but offset to account for the unity launcher and top bar. It may also be some other programs, but that's the one I use the most so I can't confirm if thats an exhaustive list. In 11.10, the programs opened maximized everytime, no problems. (12.04 64-bit, Dell XPS17, nvidia x/swat) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000469 Title: Wont start maximised To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1000469/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008277] Re: [upstream] Recent menu botches file names
Posted upstream at: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #50672 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50672 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008277 Title: [upstream] Recent menu botches file names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1008277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1008277] [NEW] Recent menu botches file names
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit Libreoffice (not sure about what package to check for version, so I just checked core: - dpkg -s libreoffice-core | grep -i version Version: 1:3.5.3-0ubuntu1 ) I have file names that have underscore characters. On the recent menu, these are all removed, probably as the string gets sanitized for other special characters. However, there's no real reason to remove underscores, that I know of anyway. Expected: All file names to be displayed as they exist on the system Actual: Underscores are removed...haven't checked other characters ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1008277 Title: Recent menu botches file names To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1008277/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760240] Re: cannot maximize window to secondary monitor
I am running Precise on a laptop with 1920x1080. When I run with an external monitor with the same resolution, everything works well. When I plug into a projector and the resolution is less than that of my primary monitor, it always wants to maximize to the primary screen. (Using different maximize methods, and making sure the window is fully on the second screen--dropping it--then maximizing it). I am running nvidia from x/swat. (nvidia-current 295.53-0ubuntu1~precise~xup1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760240 Title: cannot maximize window to secondary monitor To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/760240/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828761] Re: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed.
Haven't tried 12.04 yet for this bug, but for 11.10 I often encounter 30 seconds to 1 minute. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828761 Title: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/828761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828761] Re: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed.
Concur with #82, when I am in a hurry I have a couple times just hard- shutdown the machine and rebooted...often much faster than waiting...and I don't feel like I am waiting for an indefinite amount of time... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828761 Title: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/828761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 828761] Re: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed.
I can confirm comment #78's type of behavior with programs clearly running underneath. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/828761 Title: Resume from suspend takes much more time when nvidia-current driver is installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/828761/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 505727] Re: No mention of howto disable keyboard shortcuts in help
I don't know whether it is appropriate to add comments to an old thread, but since it is still open ?I guess it is OK? I encountered this when customizing keyboard shortcuts in gnome- terminal. There was no obvious way to remove one once it is in place. I remembered seeing something like this in the main system settings keyboard shortcuts UI, so I went there and found that `backspace` will clear the shortcut. It says so right on that UI. So why isn't this simply added as a label to the gnome-terminal shortcut UI? Seems like precendence and simplicity would both win here, as well as any newcomer trying to configure the shortcuts and getting frustrated when they can't simply clear any! Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/505727 Title: No mention of howto disable keyboard shortcuts in help To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-terminal/+bug/505727/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912458] [NEW] Disk Utility Crashes on Benchmark
Public bug reported: Built 4 identical machines, all work well. When running benchmarks using disk-utility on all four, one machine of the four fails with a segfault: palimpsest[1796]: segfault at 7fffc8278ff8 ip 7f33d60dc084 sp 7fffc8279000 error 6 in libgobject-2.0.so.0.3000.0[7f33d60a6000+4e000] The machines are: 120 GB SSD with Ubuntu partition and swap 1 TB storage drive 16 GB memory I am running: Ubuntu 11.10 64-bit gnome-disk-utility: Installed: 3.0.2-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 3.0.2-1ubuntu2 expected: proper benchmark (all four other machines performed essentially identically) actually happened: program disappeared, checked dmesg and found segfault I have checked that all four machines are hooked up similarly (same SATA controllers, etc.), and again, only one of the machines fails. And it fails consistently (same dmesg response). Thanks! ** Affects: gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912458 Title: Disk Utility Crashes on Benchmark To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/912458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 912458] Re: Disk Utility Crashes on Benchmark
Let me slightly correct myself. I went one last time and checked how each drive was hooked in. On this motherboard, there are 8 SATA ports, 4 are 3G and 4 are 6G. While both of my drives were hooked to the 6G side (with 6G cables), they weren't in the -same two- that the other machines were hooked into. For kicks, I moved these drives to the exact same two ports as the other machines, and lo-and-behold, the benchmark completed successfully, with results matching the other 3 machines. So I guess the problem statement is why the specific port matters. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912458 Title: Disk Utility Crashes on Benchmark To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-disk-utility/+bug/912458/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 842566] Re: Libreoffice and unity integration broken.
I am optimistic about this fix, it was interesting to be reading it along and see the last post was just 4 minutes ago. What is the typical time frame for this fix to propagate through all the channels and get pulled with all the regular updates? I'm happy to use his bamfdaemon if it will be weeks away, but if it isn't that long, I'll just wait until it comes down normally. Great work! Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/842566 Title: Libreoffice and unity integration broken. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/842566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 900371] [NEW] Incorrect parsing in Software Center's already installed dialog
Public bug reported: Greetings, Dash opened and recommended the package Mathomatic, so I opened this in Software Center. There is an add-on below, which I checked to download as well. I then installed the main package. The window did not appear to have installed the add-on, so I clicked Apply Changes to install the add-on. A warning popped up saying that the package is already installed. No problem, but the details in the dialog were botched. Package is already installed There isn't any need for an installation \/ Details Package [dbus.String(u'rlwrap')] is already installed I certainly wasn't trying to install that package name :-P. Searched software center with a few keywords and did not find a duplicate. lsb_release -rd: Description:Ubuntu 11.10 Release:11.10 apt-cache policy software-center: Installed: 5.0.2ubuntu0.1 Candidate: 5.0.2ubuntu0.1 Version table: *** 5.0.2ubuntu0.1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 5.0.1.4 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ oneiric/main amd64 Packages Not a big deal, but should be a quick fix, too. I tried to narrow down the bug location a bit, but got stuck. I apt-got the source for software-center and grep'd for the phrase is already installed, but it did not reveal an obvious location. Perhaps this is a great opportunity for me to dig deeper and learn more about debugging software so I can contribute. If anyone has any pointers on how I would have approached this bug, I'd love to communicate with you. ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900371 Title: Incorrect parsing in Software Center's already installed dialog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/900371/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
