[Bug 1915911] Re: Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

[Evren Yurtesen]

Paulo, thank you for the help. Great work!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915911

Title:
  Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1915911/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915911] Re: Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

[Evren Yurtesen]

Hi Paulo,
Thanks for looking into this and sorry that I forgot bionic actually. Did all 
go well?
I have some other small bugfixes for this package at #1964881 (although not 
security related and there are no code changes to source). I am not sure if you 
would like to combine them or not?
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915911

Title:
  Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1915911/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

Debian report : https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008668

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1008668
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1008668

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

debdiff for focal including the `/var/log/tomcat` folder permissions
fix.

** Patch added: "Fixes LP: #1964881 and #1861881 on 20.04/focal"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+attachment/5574178/+files/1-1.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

I prepared a patch fixing this bug. Solved the issue by changing
rsyslogd and logrotated's tomcat config using syslog:adm permissions.

This should be possible to apply to 22.04 and 21.10. Probably not to 
focal/20.04 as it is missing the patch which grants write access to `adm` group 
to `/var/log/tomcat9`
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881/comments/4
If combined with that, it can be applied to 20.04 also.

** Patch added: "Fixes LP: #1964881"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+attachment/5573761/+files/1-1.0-1ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

Ideas on possible fixes:

In Ubuntu 20.04

* Perhaps the log directory fix can be backported, in addition this require 
solution 2 from below. If solution 1 is applied from below, there would be no 
need to backport the fix from the newer package.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881/comments/4

In Ubuntu 21.10/22.04


* Solution possibility 1: As the issue is because of the difference of the user 
that `rsyslogd` runs as between Debian and Ubuntu. One solution would be 
running `rsyslogd` as root user same as in Debian. This automatically fix 
everything for the foreseeable future as the Debian `tomcat` package would work 
fine without any modifications.

* Solution possibility 2: modify /etc/logrotate.d/tomcat and replace `su
tomcat adm` with `su syslog adm`. Update `/etc/syslog.d/tomcat9.conf`
and replace `fileOwner="tomcat"` with `fileOwner="syslog"` This fix
should be applied to every time `tomcat` is imported from upstream
Debian.

* Solution possibility 3: Any ideas?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

@Chris Guiver (guiverc), I have executed apport.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] ProcEnviron.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881/+attachment/5570367/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected

** Description changed:

  In Ubuntu 20.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.31-1ubuntu0.1` (latest) package, 
`logrotated` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
  This could be fixed in a newer package but was not backported:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881
  
  In Ubuntu 22.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.58-1` (latest)  package, `logrotated`
  is not able to rotate `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
  
  Because the `catalina.out` is created with `syslog:adm` ownerships.
  `syslog` user does not have enough permissions to change this.
  
  This causes following error:
  
  rsyslogd: error during config processing: omfile: chown for file
  '/var/log/tomcat9/catalina.out' failed: Operation not permitted
  [v8.2112.0 try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2207 ]
  
  At the same time, the  `/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9` has `su tomcat adm`
  directive. Therefore the `logrotated` is not able to truncate the
  `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
  
- This causes logrotate to copy the contents of
- `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out` to as if it would be rotated. As
- `catalina.out` is never truncated, each rotated file ends up having the
- contents of `catalina.out` from the beginning of the tomcat
- installation. This causes the log sizes to keep increasing as no actual
- log rotation is being done.
+ This causes logrotate to copy the contents of `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out` 
to as if it would be rotated. As `catalina.out` is never truncated, each 
rotated file ends up having the contents of `catalina.out` from the beginning 
of the tomcat installation. This causes the log sizes to keep increasing as no 
actual log rotation is being done.
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-02-27 (18 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20220121)
+ Package: tomcat9 9.0.58-1
+ PackageArchitecture: all
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-18.18-generic 5.15.12
+ RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
+ Tags:  jammy
+ Uname: Linux 5.15.0-18-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: N/A
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881/+attachment/5570365/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881/+attachment/5570366/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1861881] Re: catalina.out not written to, permission issue

[Evren Yurtesen]

The fix helps logs to get into catalina.out but now it is impossible to rotate 
it.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881

Exactly due to the reason explained by Emmanuel Bourg
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881/comments/3
The rsyslogd runs as syslog:adm but logrotate is set to run as tomcat:adm 
therefore not able to truncate the file which is owned by syslog:adm

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1861881

Title:
  catalina.out not written to, permission issue

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] Re: Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

** Description changed:

- In Ubuntu 20.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.31-1ubuntu0.1` (latest) package,
- `logrotated` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
+ In Ubuntu 20.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.31-1ubuntu0.1` (latest) package, 
`logrotated` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
+ This could be fixed in a newer package but was not backported:
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1861881
  
  In Ubuntu 22.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.58-1` (latest)  package, `logrotated`
  is not able to rotate `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
  
+ Because the `catalina.out` is created with `syslog:adm` ownerships.
+ `syslog` user does not have enough permissions to change this.
  
- The reason of missing `catalina.out` in Ubuntu 20.04 is that the 
`/var/log/tomcat` does not have group write permission. Therefore `syslog` user 
which executes `rsyslogd` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat` folder. 
+ This causes following error:
  
- A common problem between Ubuntu 20.04/22.04 is that the
- `/etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf` file does not have the following setting:
- `fileOwner="tomcat"` (which exists in upstream Debian `tomcat9` package
- supplied `/etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf` file)
+ rsyslogd: error during config processing: omfile: chown for file
+ '/var/log/tomcat9/catalina.out' failed: Operation not permitted
+ [v8.2112.0 try https://www.rsyslog.com/e/2207 ]
  
- Because of the missing `fileOwner` setting, the `catalina.out` is
- created with `syslog:adm` ownerships. However the
- `/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9` has `su tomcat adm` directive. Therefore the
- `logrotated` is not able to truncate the `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
+ At the same time, the  `/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9` has `su tomcat adm`
+ directive. Therefore the `logrotated` is not able to truncate the
+ `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`
  
  This causes logrotate to copy the contents of
  `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out` to as if it would be rotated. As
  `catalina.out` is never truncated, each rotated file ends up having the
  contents of `catalina.out` from the beginning of the tomcat
  installation. This causes the log sizes to keep increasing as no actual
  log rotation is being done.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915911] Re: Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

[Evren Yurtesen]

I have built the package and tried it and seemed to be working. The
added patches were already in the Debian counterpart, therefore there
should not be any problems.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915911

Title:
  Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1915911/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1915911] Re: Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

[Evren Yurtesen]

* SECURITY UPDATE: TLS Denial of Service
- debian/patches/CVE-2021-41079.patch:  Apache Tomcat did not properly
  validate incoming TLS packets. When Tomcat was configured to use
  NIO+OpenSSL or NIO2+OpenSSL for TLS, a specially crafted packet could be
  used to trigger an infinite loop resulting in a denial of service.
- CVE-2021-41079
  * SECURITY UPDATE: Authentication Vulnerability
- debian/patches/CVE-2021-30640.patch: A vulnerability in the JNDI Realm
  of Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to authenticate using variations of
  a validc user name and/or to bypass some of the protection provided by
  the LockOut Realm.
- CVE-2021-30640
  * SECURITY UPDATE: Request Smuggling
- debian/patches/CVE-2021-33037.patch: Apache Tomcat did not correctly
  parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances
  leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse
  proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding
  header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response;
  - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure
  that, if present, the chunked encoding was the final encoding.
- CVE-2021-33037
  * SECURITY UPDATE: remote code execution via session persistence
- debian/patches/CVE-2021-25329.patch: The fix for CVE-2020-9484 was
  incomplete. When using Apache Tomcat with a configuration edge case that
  was highly unlikely to be used, the Tomcat instance was still vulnerable
  to CVE-2020-9494. Note that both the previously published prerequisites
  for CVE-2020-9484 and the previously published mitigations for
  CVE-2020-9484 also apply to this issue.
- CVE-2021-25329
  * SECURITY UPDATE: Request Header Duplication
- debian/patches/CVE-2021-25122.patch: When responding to new h2c
  connection requests, Apache Tomcat could duplicate request headers and a
  limited amount of request body from one request to another meaning user
  A and user B could both see the results of user A's request. 
- CVE-2021-25122
  * SECURITY UPDATE: HTTP/2 request header mix-up
- debian/patches/CVE-2020-17527.patch: HTTP/2 It was discovered that
  Apache Tomcat could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous
  stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with
  the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and
  the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information
  could leak between requests.
- CVE-2020-17527
  * SECURITY UPDATE: HTTP/2 request mix-up
- debian/patches/CVE-2020-13943.patch: If an HTTP/2 client exceeded the
  agreed maximum number of concurrent streams for a connection (in
  violation of the HTTP/2 protocol), it was possible that a subsequent
  request made on that connection could contain HTTP headers - including
  HTTP/2 pseudo headers - from a previous request rather than the intended
  headers. This could lead to users seeing responses for unexpected
  resources.
- CVE-2020-13943


** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-13943

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-17527

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-9484

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2020-9494

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-25122

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-25329

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-30640

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-33037

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-41079

** Patch added: "Imports security patches from Debian"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1915911/+attachment/5569953/+files/1ubuntu0.1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915911

Title:
  Tomcat9 package is old version with many security issues

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1915911/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964987] [NEW] FFe: Sync tomcat9 9.0.31-1~deb10u6 (universe) from Debian buster (security)

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

Please sync tomcat9 9.0.31-1~deb10u6 (universe) from Debian buster
(security)

Explanation of FeatureFreeze exception:
The Ubuntu package does not have any ubuntu specific patches added after 
FeatureFreeze in focal
However Debian package has bugfixes and security updates which does not exist 
in the Ubuntu package.

Changelog entries since current focal version 9.0.31-1:

tomcat9 (9.0.31-1~deb10u6) buster-security; urgency=high

  * Team upload.
  * CVE-2021-30640: Fix NullPointerException.
If no userRoleAttribute is specified in the user's Realm configuration its
default value will be null. This will cause a NPE in the methods
doFilterEscaping and doAttributeValueEscaping. This is upstream bug
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65308
  * Fix CVE-2021-41079:
Apache Tomcat did not properly validate incoming TLS packets. When Tomcat
was configured to use NIO+OpenSSL or NIO2+OpenSSL for TLS, a specially
crafted packet could be used to trigger an infinite loop resulting in a
denial of service.

 -- Markus Koschany   Sat, 25 Sep 2021 22:17:13 +0200

tomcat9 (9.0.31-1~deb10u5) buster-security; urgency=high

  * Team upload.
  * Fix CVE-2021-30640:
A vulnerability in the JNDI Realm of Apache Tomcat allows an attacker to
authenticate using variations of a valid user name and/or to bypass some of
the protection provided by the LockOut Realm.
  * Fix CVE-2021-33037:
Apache Tomcat did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request
header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request
smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat
incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it
would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify
encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked
encoding was the final encoding. (Closes: #991046)

 -- Markus Koschany   Sat, 07 Aug 2021 18:25:15 +0200

tomcat9 (9.0.31-1~deb10u4) buster-security; urgency=medium

  * CVE-2021-25122
  * CVE-2021-25329

 -- Moritz Mühlenhoff   Mon, 12 Apr 2021 16:45:06 +0200

tomcat9 (9.0.31-1~deb10u3) buster-security; urgency=medium

  * Fixed CVE-2020-13943: HTTP/2 request mix-up. If an HTTP/2 client exceeded
the agreed maximum number of concurrent streams for a connection (in
violation of the HTTP/2 protocol), it was possible that a subsequent
request made on that connection could contain HTTP headers - including
HTTP/2 pseudo headers - from a previous request rather than the intended
headers. This could lead to users seeing responses for unexpected resources.
  * Fixed CVE-2020-17527: HTTP/2 request header mix-up. It was discovered that
Apache Tomcat could re-use an HTTP request header value from the previous
stream received on an HTTP/2 connection for the request associated with
the subsequent stream. While this would most likely lead to an error and
the closure of the HTTP/2 connection, it is possible that information could
leak between requests.

 -- Emmanuel Bourg   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:31:47 +0100

** Affects: tomcat9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964987

Title:
  FFe: Sync tomcat9 9.0.31-1~deb10u6 (universe) from Debian buster
  (security)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964987/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964881] [NEW] Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

In Ubuntu 20.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.31-1ubuntu0.1` (latest) package,
`logrotated` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`

In Ubuntu 22.04, with `tomcat9-9.0.58-1` (latest)  package, `logrotated`
is not able to rotate `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`


The reason of missing `catalina.out` in Ubuntu 20.04 is that the 
`/var/log/tomcat` does not have group write permission. Therefore `syslog` user 
which executes `rsyslogd` is not able to write to `/var/log/tomcat` folder. 

A common problem between Ubuntu 20.04/22.04 is that the
`/etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf` file does not have the following setting:
`fileOwner="tomcat"` (which exists in upstream Debian `tomcat9` package
supplied `/etc/rsyslog.d/tomcat9.conf` file)

Because of the missing `fileOwner` setting, the `catalina.out` is
created with `syslog:adm` ownerships. However the
`/etc/logrotate.d/tomcat9` has `su tomcat adm` directive. Therefore the
`logrotated` is not able to truncate the `/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out`

This causes logrotate to copy the contents of
`/var/log/tomcat/catalina.out` to as if it would be rotated. As
`catalina.out` is never truncated, each rotated file ends up having the
contents of `catalina.out` from the beginning of the tomcat
installation. This causes the log sizes to keep increasing as no actual
log rotation is being done.

** Affects: tomcat9 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: focal jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964881

Title:
  Logging/Log rotation does not work for catalina.out

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1964881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962493] Re: Compiled with Java 11

[Evren Yurtesen]

It appears 4.21 might be requiring Java SE 11. Maybe the latest version
which is compatible with Java 8 is 4.20.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962493

Title:
  Compiled with Java 11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse-jdt-core/+bug/1962493/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962493] [NEW] Compiled with Java 11

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

It appears 4.21-1 version of this package was compiled with Java 11. If check 
the classes in this package with `file` I see version 55.0 (Java SE 11). This 
causes errors such as:
```
with root cause java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: 
org/eclipse/jdt/internal/compiler/Compiler has been compiled by a more recent 
version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of the Java 
Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0
```

For compatibility reasons it should be compiled using Java 8. Otherwise
many apps will fail to function eg. with Tomcat.

** Affects: eclipse-jdt-core (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962493

Title:
  Compiled with Java 11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse-jdt-core/+bug/1962493/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1913384] Re: Request header parsing fails in some cases with Tomcat 9.0.31

[Evren Yurtesen]

I think we hit the same problem. I have installed `9.0.41-1` tomcat
packages from [hirsute] and the problem disappeared. Can you please
upgrade the tomcat package version in Ubuntu 20.04 repository?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913384

Title:
  Request header parsing fails in some cases with Tomcat 9.0.31

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/1913384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1588562] Re: Please add ~/.local/bin to the default $PATH

[Evren Yurtesen]

Add the fix on post #15 to file .bash_profile

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588562

Title:
  Please add ~/.local/bin to the default $PATH

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1588562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767672] Re: "pip3 install cffi" core dumps

[Evren Yurtesen]

I am having the same problem on Ubuntu 18.04

** Changed in: python-pip (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767672

Title:
  "pip3 install cffi" core dumps

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pip/+bug/1767672/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1734935] [NEW] It is missing locales

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

This package seems incomplete. It is missing locales and it does not work 
properly.
Try the locale examples from the package:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pycountry

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: python-pycountry 1.8+ds1-0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-101.124-generic 4.4.95
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-101-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.13
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Nov 28 18:43:08 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-18 (466 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160719)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: pycountry
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-09-28 (426 days ago)

** Affects: pycountry (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1734935

Title:
  It is missing locales

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pycountry/+bug/1734935/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 676304] Re: Samba fails with files having colon in file name

[Evren Yurtesen]

The problem still exists in 16.04 Xenial with SAMBA 4.3.11
However I have partially solved the issue by converting the characters to 
another
https://evren-yurtesen.blogspot.fi/2017/04/how-to-access-files-with-colon-in.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/676304

Title:
  Samba fails with files having colon in file name

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/676304/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1670624] Re: Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

[Evren Yurtesen]

When I was installing the kernel it complained about possibly missing firmware 
files for amdgpu.
Then it failed first but I blacklisted amdgpu module and it booted.

Then I tried to install amdgpu-pro but that couldn't compile the module
since it doesnt support 4.11. But I think it may have installed some
firmware files and I could load the amdgpu module after boot.

But, then I decided to try to disable amdgpu for 4.8 (worst idea ever!).
Apparently everytime I boot 4.8, it destroys something from the hard
drive. It somehow managed to loose /var/lib/dpkg first but after few
reboots, completely lost the whole partition and even grub didnt start.
I am never putting 4.8 again!

So, for now, I can't really test anything anymore since ubuntu self-
destructed itself. Luckily windows and freebsd are still working. Maybe
I wait for Zesty before re-installing.

About 4.11 kernel:

I can tell that at last the basic keyboard was working in Linux/Ubuntu.
Because with 4.4 it was skipping keypresses.

The touchpad was much better, but still somewhat strange. Things like
double tap and two-finger scrolling didn't work. At least mouse cursor
was not jumping around randomly from time to time.

The WIFI didn't work, I had to install rtlwifi_new driver from github.

The hard drive was super slow, maybe even slower than before. I saw
0.6mbyte/s performance when I ran sysbench.

The CPU fan was going full speed and laptop got hot. (least of my
worries but it happened...)

I would like to help more but I don't know what I can do at this stage.
I am not even sure why amdgpu module was loaded, because the APU has sea
islands gpu, I thought this was disabled by default? Did this change in
4.11?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670624

Title:
  Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1670624/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1670624] Re: Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

[Evren Yurtesen]

@brad-figg The kernel does not complete boot. I can't boot into the
system, can you tell me how can I run apport-collect?

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670624

Title:
  Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1670624/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1670624] [NEW] Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

The machine is the same machine as in this bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830

In mid 2016 I tested 4.8 kernels on that machine and they did not boot. (and 
same errors apply to current situation)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/comments/5

Also Ubuntu 16.10 and newer releases do not boot anymore (as reported by a 
user, I think it is due to kernel). He also reports the same errors with the 
4.8 kernel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/comments/15

It seems that official release kernels still have the same problems and
nothing was fixed.

There seem to be many problems with Ubuntu on Carrizo, black screens,
random freezes. I myself experienced, keyboard problems (keyboard
sometimes do not register keystrokes), touchpad works strangely, random
freeze with caps-lock blinking, low disk performance (max 1.3mbytes/sec)
and much more.

I do not understand how hardware support can be getting worse and worse,
but that seems to be the case.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Incomplete


** Tags: 4.8 amd carrizo linux-image

** Attachment added: "rps20170307_115150.jpg"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670624/+attachment/4832788/+files/rps20170307_115150.jpg

** Tags removed: am
** Tags added: amd linux-image

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1670624

Title:
  Official 16.04 HWE 4.8 kernels do not boot (4.4 was booting)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1670624/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1642078] Re: Black screen at startup on Carrizo

[Evren Yurtesen]

Are you sure the black screens are your only problem?

I have problems with keyboard missing keypresses, touchpad doing strange
stuff, hard drive performance, random crashes and caps-lock blinks, wifi
required driver from github and manual setting of antenna. I ran
sysbench and disk was performing at about 1.3mb/s speed only! There was
at least 1 other person who wrote to my bug report that he was having
the same problems.

With 4.8 hwe kernel, it does not even boot anymore. Looking at all the
bug reports, the problems seem to be only getting worse and worse with
updates. It is almost like linux is trying to irradicate AMD machines...

Here is my bug report for the hard drive performance, are you able to replicate 
it?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642078

Title:
  Black screen at startup on Carrizo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1642078/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1656522] [NEW] Update dvb-apps/util/scan/dvb-t/fi-Turku

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

The dvb-t frequencies for fi-Turku has been recently changed. Therefore
they nust be updated.

http://www.digita.fi/medialle/verkon_tila/verkon_huolto-
_ja_hairiotiedotteet?i=6=f240

The page is in Finnish but use a translator if you dont get it.
Basically it says:

714Mhz to 538Mhz (Channel 51 to 29)
738Mhz to 658Mhz (Channel 54 to 44)
762Mhz to 682Mhz (Channel 57 to 47)
538Mhz to 594Mhz (Channel 29 to 36)
786Mhz to 634Mhz (Channel 60 to 41)
698Mhz to 570Mhz (Channel 49 to 33)

** Affects: linuxtv-dvb-apps (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1656522

Title:
  Update  dvb-apps/util/scan/dvb-t/fi-Turku

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linuxtv-dvb-apps/+bug/1656522/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

Srijan Kumar Sharma, to be honest I thought about making separate bug
reports but I think maybe Linux kernel is sponsored by Intel or
something. Because all my bug reports related to machines with AMD
processors got silently ignored after making me collect information
after information. So I decided that I would wait and see if this
specific bug report would get fixed or not before doing more bug
reports. So far 3 months and nothing. Usually what happens is that after
about a year the ticket will be updated and say that the hardware is
obsolete, or this version of linux kernel is old so I need to re-collect
all the information again..

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

Here is the link to the mailing list archive:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg53207.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

In addition, I tried 14.04.4 with 4.2.0-27-generic, result is same.,.


Operations performed:  15420 Read, 10280 Write, 32818 Other = 58518 Total
Read 240.94Mb  Written 160.62Mb  Total transferred 401.56Mb  (1.3385Mb/sec)
   85.67 Requests/sec executed

Test execution summary:
total time:  300.0019s
total number of events:  25700
total time taken by event execution: 181.3283
per-request statistics:
 min:  0.01ms
 avg:  7.06ms
 max:117.32ms
 approx.  95 percentile:  17.33ms

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev):   25700./0.00
execution time (avg/stddev):   181.3283/0.00

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

Amazingly the RC4 kernels booted! I tried both low latency and generic
and problem is still there.

It may be unrelated but I think it is worth mentioning never the less. I
have problems with keyboard skipping keypresses (Eg. forgets that I keep
my finger on CTRL key, does C instead of CTRL-C etc.), touchpad palm
detection not functioning (yes tried to enable it), grub breaking
windows hibernation/fastboot (had to put windows boot loader to do the
booting), amdgpu-pro drivers crashing, wifi rtl8723be needing driver
from github. Yeah, things are barely functioning here :(


4.8.0-040800rc4-generic:

Operations performed:  15360 Read, 10240 Write, 32675 Other = 58275 Total
Read 240Mb  Written 160Mb  Total transferred 400Mb  (1.Mb/sec)
   85.33 Requests/sec executed

Test execution summary:
total time:  300.0046s
total number of events:  25600
total time taken by event execution: 181.6251
per-request statistics:
 min:  0.01ms
 avg:  7.09ms
 max: 73.11ms
 approx.  95 percentile:  17.50ms

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev):   25600./0.00
execution time (avg/stddev):   181.6251/0.00



4.8.0-040800rc4-lowlatency:

Operations performed:  15360 Read, 10240 Write, 32641 Other = 58241 Total
Read 240Mb  Written 160Mb  Total transferred 400Mb  (1.3332Mb/sec)
   85.32 Requests/sec executed

Test execution summary:
total time:  300.0363s
total number of events:  25600
total time taken by event execution: 181.5607
per-request statistics:
 min:  0.01ms
 avg:  7.09ms
 max: 54.21ms
 approx.  95 percentile:  17.46ms

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev):   25600./0.00
execution time (avg/stddev):   181.5607/0.00

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

1)

# sudo dmidecode -s bios-version && sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date
F.19
05/27/2016

2)

It makes no difference whatsoever the difference is within reasonable
limits. Still much slower than windows host/ubuntu guest.

Test results with new bios:

Operations performed:  14832 Read, 9888 Write, 31616 Other = 56336 Total
Read 231.75Mb  Written 154.5Mb  Total transferred 386.25Mb  (1.2875Mb/sec)
   82.40 Requests/sec executed

Test execution summary:
total time:  300.0007s
total number of events:  24720
total time taken by event execution: 181.0891
per-request statistics:
 min:  0.01ms
 avg:  7.33ms
 max:148.26ms
 approx.  95 percentile:  18.11ms

Threads fairness:
events (avg/stddev):   24720./0.00
execution time (avg/stddev):   181.0891/0.00


3)

DONE!

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

The sticker says:
Model 15-ab114no
ProdID P3L25EA#UUW

Meanwhile, I tried the amdgpu-pro drivers and they keep crashing one way
or another. It feels like somebody made sure that linux won't function
on this hardware.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

The 4.8 kernels do not boot at all. I had very strange results. First it
gave errors about soft lockup. But the hardware is perfectly fine, I am
running windows and xenial (albeit slow) with no crashes or errors. Also
ran memtest and everything was fine.

The generic 4.8 is somewhat trying to boot but there are a pile of
errors ranging from

AMD-Vi: Completion loop timed out
invalid magic
invalid ELF header
IOTLB_INV_TIMEOUT

The low-latency well...

So, long story short, I can't tell if this is fixed in 4.8 kernels
because they do not even boot correctly.

** Attachment added: "4.8 kernel...oups"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+attachment/4730715/+files/IMG_20160829_211646.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1616830] Re: Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

Quoting Joseph Salisbury :

> Did this issue start happening after an update/upgrade?  Was there a
> prior kernel version where you were not having this particular problem?


It was a fresh install of xenial, I just got the laptop a short while  
ago and installed ubuntu in virtualbox, but now I wanted to try to run  
it natively.

I can try an older 12.04 release if you want that I test older kernels  
or maybe install an older kernel directly if I find them around :),  
because ubuntu is currently totally unusable anyway. So it is ok to  
erase it.


> Would it be possible for you to test the latest upstream kernel? Refer
> to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Please test the latest
> v4.8 kernel[0].

Yes, I will try to test it now. I will return back to you soon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1616830] [NEW] Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I have had a problem where importing database was much slower in a dual-
boot machine when booted into ubuntu compared to running ubuntu inside
virtualbox in windows 10. It seems Ubuntu does not like Amd carrizo fch

I collected some information and posted here (and attached as text file to 
report):
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/360373

To put it short, the disk performs up to 10 times better inside
virtualbox. (yes I thought about caches but VM box also has half the
memory and they must favor ubuntu running on real hardware with twice
ram)

I believe this is a kernel/driver related problem since it directly
effects disk performance.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.4.0-34-generic 4.4.0-34.53
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-34.53-generic 4.4.15
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-34-generic x86_64
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version k4.4.0-34-generic.
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'aplay'
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'arecord'
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  jobgo  3381 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  jobgo  3381 F pulseaudio
Card0.Amixer.info: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'amixer'
Card0.Amixer.values: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'amixer'
Card1.Amixer.info: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'amixer'
Card1.Amixer.values: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'amixer'
Date: Thu Aug 25 12:36:05 2016
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=ba38c925-a729-4e33-a08f-a7573abd2826
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-08-23 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160719)
IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'iwconfig'
MachineType: HP HP Pavilion Notebook
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcFB: 0 amdgpudrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-34-generic.efi.signed 
root=UUID=cd8e7352-609f-4ebd-83ba-24335f6eece9 ro
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-4.4.0-34-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-4.4.0-34-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware1.157.3
RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rfkill'
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 03/09/2016
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F.17
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 80B5
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: 81.29
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrF.17:bd03/09/2016:svnHP:pnHPPavilionNotebook:pvr:rvnHP:rn80B5:rvr81.29:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: HP Pavilion Notebook
dmi.sys.vendor: HP

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

** Attachment added: "Info from the launchpad answers about the problem"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830/+attachment/4727452/+files/info.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1616830

Title:
  Bad disk performance with AMD Carrizo FCH controllers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1616830/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1559245] Re: Pulseaudio selects HSP instead of A2DP and no way to set default action

[Evren Yurtesen]

If you can not change it, then there may be a different problem.
Because I can change it from command line and also if you check the launchpad 
link in my first post, you can see I wrote a script to do it automatically. 
(the first .sh script has the command line in my launchpad answers post)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559245

Title:
  Pulseaudio selects HSP instead of A2DP and no way to set default
  action

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1559245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1559245] [NEW] Pulseaudio selects HSP instead of A2DP and no way to set default action

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I am trying to use a bluetooth headphone with ubuntu 14.04 and system
defaults to using HSP. The problem is that Once it connects, it should
use A2DP and become default device because I am using it from KODI and
it is very inconvenient to set it from command line. Otherwise HSP is
providing very bad quality audio. There is no way to set a default
action, and system does not retain the last set setting. Eg. I can go
and set the headphones to use A2DP but when I connect next time, it
switches back to HSP. (I believe it could remember the device from the
device id at least!)

I asked about this on launchpad answers and somebody closed it and said I 
should report it as a bug. If you think this shouldn't have been reported as a 
bug, blame the person who closed my question at launchpad answers :) Below is 
the link to it and more information and the ugly workaround I implemented in my 
system:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/288799

** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559245

Title:
  Pulseaudio selects HSP instead of A2DP and no way to set default
  action

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-meta/+bug/1559245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1368688] Re: Inconsistence between /etc/init and /etc/init.d files

[Evren Yurtesen]

I have been hit by this bug also. Also dhcpd starts normally with dhcp
user but if restarted using the script in init.d, it starts another
instance with root user. Will you ever fix this simple issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368688

Title:
  Inconsistence between /etc/init and /etc/init.d files

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-dhcp/+bug/1368688/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] ProcModules.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062653/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] ProcInterrupts.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062652/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] Lspci.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062649/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] Re: A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected

** Description changed:

  I am using an Asrock motherboard with A88X chipset to utilize Raid0 on 2
  hard drives. However I tried Ubuntu 13.10 and 14.4 versions and it keeps
  on seeing it as 2 separate hard drives.
  
- I expected Ubuntu to recognize the RAID 0 array. I can try to provide
- any information you may require for further debugging. So feel free to
- ask...
+ I expected Ubuntu to recognize the RAID 0 array. I can try to provide any 
information you may require for further debugging. So feel free to ask...
+ --- 
+ AlsaDevices:
+  total 0
+  crw-rw 1 root audio 116,  1 Apr  3 12:12 seq
+  crw-rw 1 root audio 116, 33 Apr  3 12:12 timer
+ AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ ApportVersion: 2.14-0ubuntu1
+ Architecture: amd64
+ ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', 
'/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
+ CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
+ HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=bd13c215-a780-4a1f-ba9c-732f7e3c0f63
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-03 (0 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Daily amd64 
(20140402)
+ IwConfig:
+  p19p1 no wireless extensions.
+  
+  lono wireless extensions.
+  
+  virbr0no wireless extensions.
+ MachineType: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ Package: linux (not installed)
+ PciMultimedia:
+  
+ ProcEnviron:
+  LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
+  TERM=linux
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb
+ ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-20-generic 
root=UUID=f8feb3a5-f5ae-4651-97ea-5a266eb85280 ro
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-20.42-generic 3.13.7
+ RelatedPackageVersions:
+  linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-20-generic N/A
+  linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-20-generic  N/A
+  linux-firmware 1.127
+ RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ Tags:  trusty
+ Uname: Linux 3.13.0-20-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups:
+  
+ _MarkForUpload: True
+ dmi.bios.date: 01/17/2014
+ dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
+ dmi.bios.version: P2.00
+ dmi.board.name: FM2A88M Extreme4+
+ dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
+ dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ dmi.chassis.type: 3
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP2.00:bd01/17/2014:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnFM2A88MExtreme4+:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
+ dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
+ dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062647/+files/BootDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] UdevLog.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062655/+files/UdevLog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] ProcCpuinfo.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062651/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] Lsusb.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062650/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] UdevDb.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062654/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] CurrentDmesg.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062648/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] WifiSyslog.txt

[Evren Yurtesen]

apport information

** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649/+attachment/4062656/+files/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] Re: A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

[Evren Yurtesen]

Hello,
I have attached the requested information using apport-collect.  Please advise 
on what other information you may need.
I had to make installation of Ubuntu to one of the drives of the RAID array to 
be able to run apport-collect. (it said command not found in installer console)
Thanks,


** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1295649] [NEW] A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I am using an Asrock motherboard with A88X chipset to utilize Raid0 on 2
hard drives. However I tried Ubuntu 13.10 and 14.4 versions and it keeps
on seeing it as 2 separate hard drives.

I expected Ubuntu to recognize the RAID 0 array. I can try to provide
any information you may require for further debugging. So feel free to
ask...

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1295649

Title:
  A88X AMD Raid0 not recognized

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1295649/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1069199] Re: 1002:682f Unity does not start after installing fglrx-updates Radeon HD 7700M Series

[Evren Yurtesen]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1068404 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068404

I fixed the issue by:

After logging in and nothing appears, change to a console terminal and
login as same username, then execute

export DISPLAY=:0
dconf reset -f /org/compiz/
unity --reset-icons

This will reset all settings...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069199

Title:
  1002:682f Unity does not start after installing fglrx-updates Radeon
  HD 7700M Series

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1069199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1069199] Re: 1002:682f Unity does not start after installing fglrx-updates Radeon HD 7700M Series

[Evren Yurtesen]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1068404 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1068404

I think this is not a duplicate of the bug #1068404. In some cases
between fglrx updates the login prompt appears but unity does not start
after logging in. However logging in as a guest user (with fresh
configuration) works. Also removing all configuration from user's
homedir (forcing reset) also brings back to desktop.

This is not the same bug, because the poster clearly states that the
lightdm login prompt appears. This means X does not crash at startup. If
you look at the bug #1068404, it is clearly stated that the X crashes at
startup and it is a different bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069199

Title:
  1002:682f Unity does not start after installing fglrx-updates Radeon
  HD 7700M Series

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/fglrx/+bug/1069199/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Yes, -m seems to be working much faster...strange...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Yes, -m seems to be working much faster...strange...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1045326] Re: using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

[Evren Yurtesen]

The problem continues on freshly installed Ubuntu 12.10. It is due to
compile options Ubuntu is using and not a bug in mpich2, therefore I am
not sure what mpich2 developers can do in this situation. It is up to
Ubuntu...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326

Title:
  using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich2/+bug/1045326/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1045326] Re: using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

[Evren Yurtesen]

I tried to compile mpich2 from sources and the problem seems to be
related to checkpointing (blcr package).

blcr does not seem to work properly with kernel 3.x+ since kernel module does 
not compile
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blcr/+bug/804943
---
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  blcr-dkms
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 32 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/892 kB of archives.
After this operation, 4,440 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously unselected package blcr-dkms.
(Reading database ... 229696 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking blcr-dkms (from .../blcr-dkms_0.8.2-15ubuntu2.1_all.deb) ...
Setting up blcr-dkms (0.8.2-15ubuntu2.1) ...

Creating symlink /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.2/source -
 /usr/src/blcr-0.8.2

DKMS: add completed.

Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel.  Skipping...

Building module:
cleaning build area
make KERNELRELEASE=3.2.0-29-generic -C /lib/modules/3.2.0-29-generic/build 
M=/var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.2/build.(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 3.2.0-29-generic (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.2/build/make.log for more information.
---

So, since it is sort of useless without the kernel module (and since nobody 
could be using this unusable feature):
https://upc-bugs.lbl.gov/blcr/doc/html/FAQ.html#patch

Why does ubuntu have to enable BLCR when compiling mpich2? Isnt it
possible to not enable checkpointing?

If I compile mpich2 without ' --enable-checkpointing --with-hydra-
ckpointlib=blcr 'configure options, then everything works fine.


Also, as a side note, can you upgrade mpich2 to 1.4.1p1? (Fedora seem to have 
1.4.1p1 since FC15!)
http://www.mcs.anl.gov/research/projects/mpich2/downloads/index.php?s=downloads

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326

Title:
  using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich2/+bug/1045326/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1045326] Re: using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

[Evren Yurtesen]

I believe the problem is related to Ubuntu providing something wrong and
not a bug mpich2. I have mpich2 working fine on SL6. I will try to
compile my own mpich2 installation on ubuntu and re-test on again and
return back.

I just have bad flu now,, so it might take a week or so before I can
return back with more detailed information. But as I pointed out before,
this seem to have happened to a person before who updated his libraries
but not mpich2 installation. (as far as I understand from the thread I
mentioned in my first post).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326

Title:
  using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich2/+bug/1045326/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1045326] Re: using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

[Evren Yurtesen]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326

Title:
  using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich2/+bug/1045326/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1045326] [NEW] using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I am compiling a test program on 12.04 with latest updates:
http://people.sc.fsu.edu/~jburkardt/f_src/mpi_stubs/hello.f90

It works fine normally:
$ ./a.out 
 
HELLO_WORLD - Master process:
  FORTRAN90 version
  An MPI test program.
 
  The number of processes is   1
 
  Process   0 says Hello, world!
 
HELLO_WORLD:
  Normal end of execution.
eyurtese@supremum:~$ mpirun -n 2 ./a.out 
 
HELLO_WORLD - Master process:
  FORTRAN90 version
  An MPI test program.
 
  The number of processes is   2
 
  Process   0 says Hello, world!
  Process   1 says Hello, world!
 
HELLO_WORLD:
  Normal end of execution.

If I run it with valgrind:
$ mpirun -n 2 valgrind ./a.out 
==26486== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==26486== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==26486== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==26486== Command: ./a.out
==26486== 
==26487== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==26487== Copyright (C) 2002-2011, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==26487== Using Valgrind-3.7.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==26487== Command: ./a.out
==26487== 
==26486== Warning: ignored attempt to set SIGRT32 handler in sigaction();
==26486==  the SIGRT32 signal is used internally by Valgrind
==26487== Warning: ignored attempt to set SIGRT32 handler in sigaction();
==26487==  the SIGRT32 signal is used internally by Valgrind
cr_libinit.c:183 cri_init: sigaction() failed: Invalid argument
cr_libinit.c:183 cri_init: sigaction() failed: Invalid argument
==26486== 
==26486== HEAP SUMMARY:
==26486== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==26486==   total heap usage: 5 allocs, 5 frees, 8,165 bytes allocated
==26486== 
==26486== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==26486== 
==26486== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==26486== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)
==26487== 
==26487== HEAP SUMMARY:
==26487== in use at exit: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==26487==   total heap usage: 5 allocs, 5 frees, 8,165 bytes allocated
==26487== 
==26487== All heap blocks were freed -- no leaks are possible
==26487== 
==26487== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==26487== ERROR SUMMARY: 0 errors from 0 contexts (suppressed: 2 from 2)

=
=   BAD TERMINATION OF ONE OF YOUR APPLICATION PROCESSES
=   EXIT CODE: 134
=   CLEANING UP REMAINING PROCESSES
=   YOU CAN IGNORE THE BELOW CLEANUP MESSAGES
=
APPLICATION TERMINATED WITH THE EXIT STRING: Aborted (signal 6)


I have manually compiled Valgrind 3.8 and I am getting the same error, which 
makes me think that the problem is mpich2.

Also I found a thread which mentions that somebody had same problem fixed by 
upgrading mpich2 from 1.3 to 1.4 but we already have 1.4.1 in ubuntu, so 
perhaps an update to 1.4.1p1 would be good?  (I think it has nothing to do with 
the versions but perhaps compiling against newer libraries does help).
http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/mpich-discuss/2011-August/010608.html

if the problem is libcr, then somebody must put a note to recompile
mpich2 package everytime libcr is updated.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: mpich2 1.4.1-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Sep  3 16:14:10 2012
InstallationMedia: This
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: mpich2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: mpich2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1045326

Title:
  using valgrind with mpirun causes problems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpich2/+bug/1045326/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1038432] [NEW] Additional Drivers feature is behaving strangely....

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

On my laptop with AMD E-450 processor, I see that Additional drivers
suggest 2 options for graphics drivers.

* Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators
* ATI Fire GL

I selected Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators and it
installed activated it. However after reboot I see that ATI Fire GL is
activated. When I click on it, I see This driver is activated but not
currently in use and Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators
NOT active.

 I re-activate Video driver for the AMD graphics accelerators and
apply, I see that it is deactivated after reboot.

I am not sure why this is suppose to be so confusing. Cant there be only
a single option which is AMD graphics accelerator driver?

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038432

Title:
  Additional Drivers feature is behaving strangely

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1038432/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Well, it is not like I use NIS at home all by myself :p if Ubuntu wont
support it, just remove it from distribution then. So it would make the
decision of which distro to use in large organisations easier.

I checked the packets using tcpdump limited to the NIS server.

Ubuntu had 24k lines in the output file
Fedora had 2.4k lines in the output file

Fedora was accessing port 767 and accessed an additional UDP port 770
and sometimes 938 on the server... while Ubuntu was just accessing 767
only so many more times...

I tried disabling iptables on ubuntu altogether and still the results
are same. It is just that I am getting the correct info as well and
finger seems to be working. I am not sure what  might be timing out.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Well, it is not like I use NIS at home all by myself :p if Ubuntu wont
support it, just remove it from distribution then. So it would make the
decision of which distro to use in large organisations easier.

I checked the packets using tcpdump limited to the NIS server.

Ubuntu had 24k lines in the output file
Fedora had 2.4k lines in the output file

Fedora was accessing port 767 and accessed an additional UDP port 770
and sometimes 938 on the server... while Ubuntu was just accessing 767
only so many more times...

I tried disabling iptables on ubuntu altogether and still the results
are same. It is just that I am getting the correct info as well and
finger seems to be working. I am not sure what  might be timing out.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1036622] [NEW] Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I am having slow NIS performance compared to Fedora with nearly
identical configurations. I couldnt quite find out exactly what might be
the problem and I also tried asking it as a question in answers
section. All I got was a reply that I should open a bug report.

https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/205634

The yp.conf is identical between Fedora and Ubuntu boxes in question.  I
am guessing Fedora caches the NIS information somehow. But I am not sure
exactly why this does not happen in Ubuntu?

Do you have any suggestions???

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nis 3.17-32ubuntu4.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Aug 14 14:42:24 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/ypbind
InstallationMedia: This
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: nis
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.yp.conf: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.yp.conf: 2012-08-06T15:55:37.478872

** Affects: nis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nis in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs

[Bug 1036622] [NEW] Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I am having slow NIS performance compared to Fedora with nearly
identical configurations. I couldnt quite find out exactly what might be
the problem and I also tried asking it as a question in answers
section. All I got was a reply that I should open a bug report.

https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+question/205634

The yp.conf is identical between Fedora and Ubuntu boxes in question.  I
am guessing Fedora caches the NIS information somehow. But I am not sure
exactly why this does not happen in Ubuntu?

Do you have any suggestions???

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: nis 3.17-32ubuntu4.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Aug 14 14:42:24 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/ypbind
InstallationMedia: This
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
SourcePackage: nis
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.yp.conf: [modified]
mtime.conffile..etc.yp.conf: 2012-08-06T15:55:37.478872

** Affects: nis (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1036622] Re: Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

[Evren Yurtesen]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1036622

Title:
  Slow NIS performance with programs such as 'finger'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nis/+bug/1036622/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 969860] Re: fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)

[Evren Yurtesen]

I just installed Ubuntu 12.04 to a desktop machine with Radeon HD 5870
and compiz is using 100% when the screen is off. I didnt try any of the
workarounds on this machine. There are so many workarounds mentioned and
half of them seem to work only for half of the people. I dont know where
to start... Why compiz can not stop itself when the screen is off (since
there is nothing to show?)   ...strange...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860

Title:
  fglrx uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in
  glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/969860/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1007368] Re: AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

[Evren Yurtesen]

I now see the same versions on both machines...  strange...anyway this
report can be closed.

** Changed in: fglrx-installer-updates (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007368

Title:
  AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/1007368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1007368] [NEW] AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

Try to install AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver from
additional drivers.

2012-06-01 14:26:49,306 DEBUG: download progress Package: name:'fglrx-updates' 
architecture='amd64' id:16895L 100.00
2012-06-01 14:26:50,922 DEBUG: install progress dpkg-exec 0.00
2012-06-01 14:26:53,687 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 0.00
2012-06-01 14:26:53,788 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 5.00
2012-06-01 14:26:54,597 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 10.00
2012-06-01 14:26:54,676 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 15.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,017 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 15.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,023 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 20.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,240 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 25.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,350 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 30.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,852 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 30.00
2012-06-01 14:26:55,855 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 35.00
2012-06-01 14:28:10,429 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 40.00
2012-06-01 14:28:10,516 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 45.00
2012-06-01 14:28:10,764 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 45.00
2012-06-01 14:28:10,865 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 50.00
2012-06-01 14:28:11,575 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 55.00
2012-06-01 14:28:11,644 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:11,721 DEBUG: install progress libc-bin 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:11,997 DEBUG: install progress initramfs-tools 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:41,974 DEBUG: install progress ureadahead 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:42,347 DEBUG: install progress dpkg-exec 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:42,494 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 60.00
2012-06-01 14:28:42,664 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 65.00
2012-06-01 14:28:42,798 DEBUG: install progress libc6-i386 70.00
2012-06-01 14:28:42,948 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 70.00
2012-06-01 14:28:43,047 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 75.00
2012-06-01 14:28:43,165 DEBUG: install progress lib32gcc1 80.00
2012-06-01 14:28:43,289 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 80.00
2012-06-01 14:28:43,616 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 85.00
2012-06-01 14:29:26,779 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-updates 90.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,096 DEBUG: install progress bamfdaemon 90.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,419 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 90.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,494 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 95.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,569 DEBUG: install progress fglrx-amdcccle-updates 
100.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,653 DEBUG: install progress libc-bin 100.00
2012-06-01 14:29:27,930 DEBUG: install progress initramfs-tools 100.00
2012-06-01 14:29:59,126 DEBUG: Selecting previously unselected package 
libc6-i386.
(Reading database ... 139779 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libc6-i386 (from .../libc6-i386_2.15-0ubuntu10_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package lib32gcc1.
Unpacking lib32gcc1 (from .../lib32gcc1_1%3a4.6.3-1ubuntu5_amd64.deb) ...
Selecting previously unselected package fglrx-updates.
Unpacking fglrx-updates (from .../fglrx-updates_2%3a8.960-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) 
...
restore of system environment completed
Uninstall fglrx driver complete.
For detailed log of uninstall, please see /etc/ati/fglrx-uninstall.log
System must be rebooted to avoid system instability and potential data loss.
Selecting previously unselected package fglrx-amdcccle-updates.
Unpacking fglrx-amdcccle-updates (from 
.../fglrx-amdcccle-updates_2%3a8.960-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin ...
ldconfig deferred processing now taking place
Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-3.2.0-24-generic
Processing triggers for ureadahead ...
ureadahead will be reprofiled on next reboot
Setting up libc6-i386 (2.15-0ubuntu10) ...
Setting up lib32gcc1 (1:4.6.3-1ubuntu5) ...
Setting up fglrx-updates (2:8.960-0ubuntu1) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/fglrx/ld.so.conf to provide 
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu_GL.conf (x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf) in auto 
mode.
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of /etc/OpenCL/vendors/amdocl32.icd 
because associated file /usr/lib/fglrx/etc/OpenCL/vendors/amdocl32.icd (of link 
group x86_64-linux-gnu_gl_conf) doesn't exist.
update-alternatives: using /usr/lib/fglrx/alt_ld.so.conf to provide 
/etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf (i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf) in auto mode.
update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
Loading new fglrx-updates-8.960 DKMS files...
First Installation: checking all kernels...
Building only for 3.2.0-24-generic
Building for architecture x86_64
Building initial module for 3.2.0-24-generic
Done.

fglrx_updates:
Running module version sanity check.
 - Original module
   - No original module exists within this 

[Bug 1007368] Re: AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

[Evren Yurtesen]

** Attachment added: Installation log file...
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007368/+attachment/3171355/+files/jockey.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007368

Title:
  AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1007368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1007368] Re: AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

[Evren Yurtesen]

The regular package installs, but it is older version (than the latest
AMD Catalyst 12.4)...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007368

Title:
  AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/1007368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1007368] Re: AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

[Evren Yurtesen]

You are right. I seem to have the latest driver from the 'additional
drivers' but there is still something strange going on. We just had a
new installation of Ubuntu 12.04 and AMD CCC showed different numbers
there while the 12.04 in my machine which was installed a while back
showed different numbers. (and I thought that was because I used AMDs
installer to install newest version directly, but it appears I did
not...)

Unfortunately the other machine is not here now so I cant check it, but
on tuesday we will re-check the installations and report back if we find
or not find some discrepancies...

It would be nice if the additional drivers section would print out a
more understandable error message, also it is not very clear what
happens if you select only post-release updates or both normal driver +
post-release updates (wouldnt these both end up the same latest driver
being installed?)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1007368

Title:
  AMD Catalyst FGLRX post-release updates driver does not install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fglrx-installer-updates/+bug/1007368/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 998722] [NEW] Disabling Bluetooth also disables Wi-Fi

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

I have a Broadcom Corporation BCM4313 which has bluetooth and wifi. I am
using the 'additional drivers' provided by ubuntu.

When I disable bluetooth from the top bar, wifi powers down too. It is
possible to disable bluetooth separatelly in Windows.

This happens on 12.04 LTS with latest packages (by today)

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998722

Title:
  Disabling Bluetooth also disables Wi-Fi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/998722/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 998724] [NEW] virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

on Ubuntu 12.04 LTE the virt-manager does not function after
installation.

The installation is done by following:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KVM/Installation

The message is:
Error: No active connection to install on.

I have found a forum entry where other people were having the same problem and 
there are more details there:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1976578

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998724

Title:
  virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/998724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 998724] Re: virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

[Evren Yurtesen]

It appears it is working when virt-manager is executed by root and bios
has virtualization enabled (perhaps the packages should check this
automatically eh?'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998724

Title:
  virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/998724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 920853] Re: Virt-manager will exit with error 'internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64'

[Evren Yurtesen]

I am having the same problem and virtualization is enabled in bios and I have 
the latest packages for 12.04 lte
virtinst (0.600.1-1ubuntu3) 

** Changed in: virt-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired = New

** Changed in: virt-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

** Changed in: virt-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920853

Title:
  Virt-manager will exit with error 'internal error Cannot find suitable
  emulator for x86_64'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/920853/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 998724] Re: virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

[Evren Yurtesen]

I could resolve this issue by adding my user to kvm and libvirtd groups.

$ sudo adduser `id -un` kvm
$ sudo adduser `id -un` libvirtd

I believe the installer either should suggest adding the user to these
groups or virt-manager should become root by asking credentials at
startup.

After adding myself to groups, I got stuck at the following reported problem:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/920853

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998724

Title:
  virt-manager does not fuunction after installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/998724/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 998722] Re: Disabling Bluetooth also disables Wi-Fi

[Evren Yurtesen]

Just added more info...

** Package changed: ubuntu = broadcom-sta (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/998722

Title:
  Disabling Bluetooth also disables Wi-Fi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/broadcom-sta/+bug/998722/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 920853] Re: Virt-manager will exit with error 'internal error Cannot find suitable emulator for x86_64'

[Evren Yurtesen]

Please ask if you need more information about this problem... It is
strange that it was just closed...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920853

Title:
  Virt-manager will exit with error 'internal error Cannot find suitable
  emulator for x86_64'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/920853/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 969860] Re: [fglrx] compiz uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)

[Evren Yurtesen]

Same problem HP dm1z-4100 (amd e-450)
Setting Force full screen redraw (buffer swap) on repaint seems to improve 
performance overall, compiz normally uses 60-80% cpu when moving a window 
(crazy right?) and when set Force full screen redraw (buffer swap) on repaint 
it uses only ~30%.

Also the cpu usage is near zero % when the screen is off with the Force
full screen redraw (buffer swap) on repaint option.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/969860

Title:
  [fglrx] compiz uses 100% CPU when screen turns off (spinning in
  glXWaitVideoSyncSGI or glXSwapBuffers)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/969860/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 989035] Re: Compiz uses more CPU and mem since upgrading from 11.10

[Evren Yurtesen]

I have exactly the same issue, moving the mouse makes compiz to use 50%
CPU

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/989035

Title:
  Compiz uses more CPU and mem since upgrading from 11.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/989035/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 988713] Re: Compiz cpu usage high when moving windows

[Evren Yurtesen]

In my case compiz uses up to 50% CPU only for moving the mouse cursor...
Do you see the same?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988713

Title:
  Compiz cpu usage high when moving windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/988713/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 982460] Re: Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

[Evren Yurtesen]

Hello,

The target media in question was a 16GB Transcend Ultra-Speed USB stick.
Now the stick was working fine under normal use in windows. Although I
am using it on a brand new AMD Fusion laptop HP Pavilion dm1-4100.

I could install Ubuntu when I tried again. However it crashed at some
point, it couldnt find any commands (I was in ssh) and I couldnt shut it
down either. So I guess it is possible that it lost the stick again.

So, the question is, how can I test the stick in windows to find out
that this is not related to stick itself but perhaps something Ubuntu
does (perhaps a bad driver?) is causing this problem?

Is there a practical way that you can suggest with which I can test the
stick under Ubuntu?

I am fairly sure that the stick is performing alright, I never had a
similar issue with this stick earlier.

Thanks,
Evren

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982460

Title:
  Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/982460/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 982460] [NEW] Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

[Evren Yurtesen]

Public bug reported:

Everything was going fine and installation was near the end, all of a
sudden it said it crashed and I can do a bug report and here I am...

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ubiquity 2.10.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.33-generic 3.2.12
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.312
Date: Sun Apr 15 20:05:32 2012
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120328)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982460

Title:
  Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/982460/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 982460] Re: Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

[Evren Yurtesen]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/982460

Title:
  Installer crashed at installation...thats all I know...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/982460/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs