[Bug 1726879] Re: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated
IMO this should definitely be a SRU, yes, especially since sa-learn is called daily in a cron job, so you get this warning in your e-mail inbox every day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726879 Title: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1726879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1726879] Re: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated
It will be applied when someone is willing and able to do it. I suppose I'll be able to find some time towards the end of the month, if no one does it before. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1726879 Title: Unescaped left brace in regex is deprecated To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spamassassin/+bug/1726879/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
Well, it looks like Firefox 51 brought up this issue again, and now there is no newer gtk3-engines-oxygen to install... Time to uograde to Xenial? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
You should always keep your system fully up to date. As for the fact that some borders are black, it does not look like a bug to me. It does not render Firefox unusable, and in fact I prefer it that way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
14.04.2? The current point release is .5, and also the current Firefox is 48. My Firefox doesn't look like either of your screenshots. ** Attachment added: "Untitled.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+attachment/4728286/+files/Untitled.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
Thanks for the correction, I just noticed I pasted the same link twice... I do not have the problem you mention, however. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
Since it doesn't seem that the backports will be done any time soon, here's how to compile it yourself. 1. Download and extract http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/o/oxygen-gtk3/oxygen-gtk3_1.4.1-2ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz. Do not remove the tarball. 2. cd to oxygen-gtk3-1.4.1. 3. Download and extract http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/o/oxygen-gtk3/oxygen-gtk3_1.4.1-2ubuntu1.debian.tar.xz. Remove the tarball. 4. Run debuild. Of course, install it if you don't have it already (the "command not found" error message should tell you which package to install). Likewise, if you get an an error message about a missing dependency during compilation, install that package and run debuild again. 5. At the end of the compilation, you will see an error message when GPG fails to sign the package with the maintainer's key (of course, you are not the maintainer, so you do not have the correct GPG private key). This is not a problem, the package is still created normally, it is just not signed. 6. The .deb package is in the parent directory, you can now install it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
I made a backport request, which is Bug #1593210. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] Re: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors
Indeed compiling the Wily package on Trusty solves the problem. Sadly, it cannot be installed on Trusty directly due to trusty not having the required dpendencies... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042 Title: Firefox 46 update causes theme errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oxygen-gtk3/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576042] [NEW] Many display problems with oxygen-gtk on KDE
Public bug reported:
With the new Firefox 46 package, Firefox looks very bad when used on KDE
with the oxygen-gtk theme. Most notably, tooltips are now displayed in
black text on black background, but other elements such as form items
(text areas or buttons) also look bad. This is not GTK3-specific, as
other GTK3 apps such as GEdit look fine.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: firefox 46.0+build5-0ubuntu0.14.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.38~14.04.1-generic 4.4.8
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.20
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
/dev/snd/controlC0: firas 2450 F pulseaudio
BuildID: 20160425115534
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Thu Apr 28 14:47:14 2016
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
ForcedLayersAccel: False
IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant compatibility.ini
or extensions.sqlite)
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-04-06 (387 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 14.04.2 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64
(20150219.1)
IpRoute:
default via 172.16.200.1 dev eth0 proto static
172.16.200.0/24 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 172.16.200.141 metric
1
Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Plugins:
Skype Buttons for Kopete - /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/skypebuttons.so (kopete)
Shockwave Flash - /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so
(adobe-flashplugin)
PrefSources:
prefs.js
[Profile]/extensions/{0AA9101C-D3C1-4129-A9B7-D778C6A17F82}/defaults/preferences/rikaichan.js
Profiles: Profile0 (Default) - LastVersion=46.0/20160425115534 (In use)
RelatedPackageVersions:
kopete4:4.13.3-0ubuntu0.1
adobe-flashplugin 1:20160407.1-0ubuntu0.14.04.1
RfKill:
0: phy0: Wireless LAN
Soft blocked: no
Hard blocked: no
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
WifiSyslog:
dmi.bios.date: 11/23/2012
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: A08
dmi.board.name: 0XR1GT
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA08:bd11/23/2012:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron660:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0XR1GT:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: Inspiron 660
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages trusty
** Attachment added: "Untitled.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042/+attachment/4649748/+files/Untitled.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576042
Title:
Many display problems with oxygen-gtk on KDE
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1576042/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556094] [NEW] php5-dev installs wrong symlink to ltmain.sh
Public bug reported: php5-dev installs /usr/lib/php5/build/ltmain.sh as a symlink to /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh, however the latter file is not installed by any package, resulting in a broken symlink. A visible result is that building PHP modules through PECL fails. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy php5-dev php5-dev: Installed: 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556094 Title: php5-dev installs wrong symlink to ltmain.sh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1556094/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556094] [NEW] php5-dev installs wrong symlink to ltmain.sh
Public bug reported: php5-dev installs /usr/lib/php5/build/ltmain.sh as a symlink to /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh, however the latter file is not installed by any package, resulting in a broken symlink. A visible result is that building PHP modules through PECL fails. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu Xenial Xerus (development branch) Release:16.04 $ apt-cache policy php5-dev php5-dev: Installed: 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 Candidate: 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 Version table: *** 5.6.17+dfsg-3ubuntu1 500 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: php5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556094 Title: php5-dev installs wrong symlink to ltmain.sh To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/php5/+bug/1556094/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1406825] Re: xscreensaver complains This version of xscreensaver is VERY OLD!
This is not how Ubuntu works. If you want the latest version of packages, use Arch or something. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406825 Title: xscreensaver complains This version of xscreensaver is VERY OLD! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1406825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1406825] Re: xscreensaver complains This version of xscreensaver is VERY OLD!
This is absolutely ridiculous. We need an Ubuntu patch to remove the popup code. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1406825 Title: xscreensaver complains This version of xscreensaver is VERY OLD! To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/1406825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 774089] Re: Booting fails 3 times, works every fourth time after new install of Natty Narwhal amd64 on Macbook Pro
Same issue on my 5,5. Flashing as per #20 worked beautifully. Thanks a tin, Gabriel, you saved me a nice bunch of money because mine isn't on warranty anymore. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/774089 Title: Booting fails 3 times, works every fourth time after new install of Natty Narwhal amd64 on Macbook Pro To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/efibootmgr/+bug/774089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 731625] Re: [CVE-2009-0385] arbitrary code excecution via NULL pointer dereference
Yes, the file is used, see lines 3358 and 6716 of attached build log. ** Attachment added: build.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/+bug/731625/+attachment/1898624/+files/build.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/731625 Title: [CVE-2009-0385] arbitrary code excecution via NULL pointer dereference -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694398] Re: FTBFS package cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23 in Natty
Debian doesn't use that revision anymore, but they don't mention this problem in the changelog for the newer ones, so I guess it is still present. I will report it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS package cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23 in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694398] Re: FTBFS package cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23 in Natty
Debian doesn't use that revision anymore, but they don't mention this problem in the changelog for the newer ones, so I guess it is still present. I will report it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS package cyrus-sasl2 2.1.23 in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty
I can't install openjdk-7 from the PPA, there seems to be a version/dependency issue: r...@itsuki:~# apt-get install openjdk-7-jre-lib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: openjdk-7-jre-lib : Depends: openjdk-7-jre-headless (= 7b89~pre1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages r...@itsuki:~# apt-cache policy openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-headless: Installed: (none) Candidate: 7~b117~pre1-0maverick1 Version table: 7~b117~pre1-0maverick1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/openjdk/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status r...@itsuki:~# dpkg --compare-versions '7~b117~pre1-0maverick1' '=' '7b89~pre1'; echo $? 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty
I can't install openjdk-7 from the PPA, there seems to be a version/dependency issue: r...@itsuki:~# apt-get install openjdk-7-jre-lib Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: openjdk-7-jre-lib : Depends: openjdk-7-jre-headless (= 7b89~pre1) but it is not going to be installed E: Broken packages r...@itsuki:~# apt-cache policy openjdk-7-jre-headless openjdk-7-jre-headless: Installed: (none) Candidate: 7~b117~pre1-0maverick1 Version table: 7~b117~pre1-0maverick1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/openjdk/ppa/ubuntu/ maverick/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status r...@itsuki:~# dpkg --compare-versions '7~b117~pre1-0maverick1' '=' '7b89~pre1'; echo $? 1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694599] [NEW] 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: FTBFS in Natty because of the new toolchain (log at http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu- nbs/32/eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4_lubuntu32.buildlog ). The following patch fixes the linking errors, but the package stil FTBFS, apparently because of Java-related errors. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
** Patch added: eucalyptus_fix_linking_in_natty.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/694599/+attachment/1776797/+files/eucalyptus_fix_linking_in_natty.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 687970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Build log with the patch applied, showing the Java errors. ** Attachment added: build.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/694599/+attachment/1776798/+files/build.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 687970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 687970 [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty * You can subscribe to bug 687970 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/687970/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty
I wonder why it didn't show this bug as a possible duplicate when I filed 694599... Anyway, I submittd a patch there that fixes the linking errors, but the package still fails to build because of Java-related error. SInce I know very little about Java, I can't go further. :[ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to eucalyptus in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694599] [NEW] 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: FTBFS in Natty because of the new toolchain (log at http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu- nbs/32/eucalyptus_2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4_lubuntu32.buildlog ). The following patch fixes the linking errors, but the package stil FTBFS, apparently because of Java-related errors. ** Affects: eucalyptus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
** Patch added: eucalyptus_fix_linking_in_natty.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/694599/+attachment/1776797/+files/eucalyptus_fix_linking_in_natty.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 687970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Build log with the patch applied, showing the Java errors. ** Attachment added: build.log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/694599/+attachment/1776798/+files/build.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694599] Re: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 687970 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 687970 [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty * You can subscribe to bug 687970 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eucalyptus/+bug/687970/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694599 Title: 2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4 FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687970] Re: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty
I wonder why it didn't show this bug as a possible duplicate when I filed 694599... Anyway, I submittd a patch there that fixes the linking errors, but the package still fails to build because of Java-related error. SInce I know very little about Java, I can't go further. :[ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687970 Title: [FTBFS] package 'eucalyptus' (2.0+bzr1241-0ubuntu4) failed to build on natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694342] [NEW] FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu- nbs/32/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu2_lubuntu32.buildlog ** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
Fix. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776162/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
New debdiff with some corrections. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776178/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
There were a dozen new upstream patches since ubuntu2, might as well include them now, so new debdiff. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776194/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to autofs5 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694398] [NEW] FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/cyrus- sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu2_lubuntu32.buildlog ** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694398] Re: FTBFS in Natty
And here's a fix. ** Patch added: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/694398/+attachment/1776335/+files/cyrus-sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to cyrus-sasl2 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 694342] [NEW] FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: autofs5 http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu- nbs/32/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu2_lubuntu32.buildlog ** Affects: autofs5 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: ftbfs natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
Fix. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776162/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
New debdiff with some corrections. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776178/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694342] Re: FTBFS in Natty
There were a dozen new upstream patches since ubuntu2, might as well include them now, so new debdiff. ** Patch added: autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autofs5/+bug/694342/+attachment/1776194/+files/autofs5_5.0.5-0ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694342 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687990] Re: [FTBFS] package 'sendmail' (8.14.4-2) failed to build on natty
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #608011 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608011 ** Also affects: sendmail (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608011 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687990 Title: [FTBFS] package 'sendmail' (8.14.4-2) failed to build on natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694387] [NEW] FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: wvdial http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu- nbs/32/wvdial_1.60.4_lubuntu32.buildlog Reported in Debian with a patch attached, wait and see if they apply it. ** Affects: wvdial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: wvdial (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #608018 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608018 ** Also affects: wvdial (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=608018 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694387 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687990] Re: [FTBFS] package 'sendmail' (8.14.4-2) failed to build on natty
Reported to Debian with a patch attached since we haven't diverted. Wait and see if they apply it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687990 Title: [FTBFS] package 'sendmail' (8.14.4-2) failed to build on natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694398] [NEW] FTBFS in Natty
Public bug reported: http://people.ubuntuwire.org/~lucas/ubuntu-nbs/32/cyrus- sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu2_lubuntu32.buildlog ** Affects: cyrus-sasl2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 694398] Re: FTBFS in Natty
And here's a fix. ** Patch added: cyrus-sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu3.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cyrus-sasl2/+bug/694398/+attachment/1776335/+files/cyrus-sasl2_2.1.23.dfsg1-5ubuntu3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/694398 Title: FTBFS in Natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #594429 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594429 ** Also affects: opensc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594429 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 644476] Re: TERM is not set in guake since I upgraded to Maverick
Already reported upstream. http://guake.org/ticket/249 ** Bug watch added: guake.org/ #249 http://guake.org/ticket/249 -- TERM is not set in guake since I upgraded to Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/644476 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643558] Re: there are dependency problems xulrunner-1.9.2
We need more information, please... Which release of Ubuntu? Which package fails to install? Due to which dependency? -- there are dependency problems xulrunner-1.9.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643845] Re: /usr/bin/time doesn't allow switches/flag/options
Not a bug, you are using the Bash time builtin, not the /usr/bin/time command. $ /usr/bin/time -a -o log ls will work. -- /usr/bin/time doesn't allow switches/flag/options https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643845 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641810] Re: engineers forget progress when loading game
Subscribed ubuntu-sponsors since the tests look good. -- engineers forget progress when loading game https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643948] Re: Installation Bug (User Creation Step)
Duplicate of 631046. -- Installation Bug (User Creation Step) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643957] Re: zsh segfaults when pressing ^C while it is waiting for completion of a multi-line command
Can't reproduce here. -- zsh segfaults when pressing ^C while it is waiting for completion of a multi-line command https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643957 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643948] Re: Installation Bug (User Creation Step)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 631046 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631046 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 631046 Installer hangs if nonASCII symbols are in username * You can subscribe to bug 631046 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/631046/+subscribe -- Installation Bug (User Creation Step) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643028] Re: wine_versions.py crashed with IOError in assign()
We need more detailed steps to reproduce the bug. -- wine_versions.py crashed with IOError in assign() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643028 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643168] Re: gcm-prefs tries to install nonexistent shared-color-targets
We need precise steps to reproduce, please. The package shared-color- targets does not exist in any Debian or Ubuntu release, I'd be surprised if an Ubuntu package explicitly asked for it. -- gcm-prefs tries to install nonexistent shared-color-targets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 643168] Re: gcm-prefs tries to install nonexistent shared-color-targets
Okay, well, there's no easy fix for that. A new package in Maverick now (let alone in Lucid) would probably be rejected. We can backport the PPA version, but that would probably take a while since it's a new package... -- gcm-prefs tries to install nonexistent shared-color-targets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/643168 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641810] Re: engineers forget progress when loading game
The bug is fixed upstream, debdiff attached. ** Patch added: freeciv_2.2.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freeciv/+bug/641810/+attachment/1602292/+files/freeciv_2.2.1-1ubuntu1.debdiff -- engineers forget progress when loading game https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 642232] Re: Missing libqt4-sql-sqlite dependency
Here. :p ** Patch added: mixxx_1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mixxx/+bug/642232/+attachment/1605142/+files/mixxx_1.8.0%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu2.debdiff -- Missing libqt4-sql-sqlite dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641886] Re: Mixxx 1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 Cannot open database
** Patch added: mixxx_1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/mixxx/+bug/641886/+attachment/1605067/+files/mixxx_1.8.0%2Bdfsg-0ubuntu2.debdiff -- Mixxx 1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 Cannot open database https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 641886] Re: Mixxx 1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 Cannot open database
Ouch, sorry, this is the project bug tracker, I'll post it on the Ubuntu bug. :p -- Mixxx 1.8.0+dfsg-0ubuntu1 Cannot open database https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641886 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623862] Re: bygfoot crashes when starting a new season; developers in sourceforge say that bug is fixed in 2.3.2
We can't do anything without a minimal patch that fixes this particular issue. We don't want to import a lot of unrelated changed into a stable release because of the high risk of regressions. Or you can request a backport: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How%20to%20request%20new%20packages -- bygfoot crashes when starting a new season; developers in sourceforge say that bug is fixed in 2.3.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624901] Re: Random data being returned in a function
It's a bug in the code. The function force_widget_redraw in src/animation.c is supposed to return a gboolean, but there is no return statement in the body of the function. It should probably be fixed in git soon, or you can try an earlier revision. -- Random data being returned in a function https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623846] Re: libzip-0.9 has a memory leak in zip_close
Since the bug is well-known and fixed upstream, I have made a debdiff for a possible SRU. I don't use the package, though, so I can't test without precise test instructions. ** Patch added: libzip_0.9-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzip/+bug/623846/+attachment/1517510/+files/libzip_0.9-3ubuntu0.1.debdiff -- libzip-0.9 has a memory leak in zip_close https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623846 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623862] Re: bygfoot crashes when starting a new season; developers in sourceforge say that bug is fixed in 2.3.2
Zlatan; No, we need a precise patch that fixes this issue, nothing else. We don't upload whole new versions of packages. Do you have the number of the svn revision that fixes this bug? -- bygfoot crashes when starting a new season; developers in sourceforge say that bug is fixed in 2.3.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
Bug fixed in opensc 0.11.12-1ubuntu3.1 fi...@aoba ~ % dpkg -l | grep opensc ii libopensc2 0.11.12-1ubuntu3.1 Smart card library with support for PKCS#15 ii opensc 0.11.12-1ubuntu3.1 Smart card utilities with support for PKCS#1 fi...@aoba ~ % pkcs15-init -E -C Using reader with a card: Feitian SCR301 00 00 New User PIN. Please enter User PIN: Please type again to verify: Unblock Code for New User PIN (Optional - press return for no PIN). Please enter User unblocking PIN (PUK): Please type again to verify: fi...@aoba ~ % openssl genrsa -des3 -out mykey.key 1024 Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus ..++ ..++ e is 65537 (0x10001) Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: Verifying - Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: fi...@aoba ~ % pkcs15-init -S mykey.key --auth-id ff Using reader with a card: Feitian SCR301 00 00 Please enter passphrase to unlock secret key: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: fi...@aoba ~ % openssl genrsa -des3 -out mykey.key 2048 Generating RSA private key, 2048 bit long modulus .+++ .+++ e is 65537 (0x10001) Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: Verifying - Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: fi...@aoba ~ % pkcs15-init -S mykey.key --auth-id ff Using reader with a card: Feitian SCR301 00 00 Please enter passphrase to unlock secret key: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: No regressions found. Tested: generating a RSA key directly on the card, extracting the public key, generating an X.509 certificate for a key, and storing the certificate on the card, all for 1024-bit and 2048-bit keys. -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 623991] Re: cfv fails to detect files with trailing spaces in sfv file
You should report that upstream. It may be a deliberate design choice, since the SFV format if AFAIK not standardised. -- cfv fails to detect files with trailing spaces in sfv file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/623991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
Debdiff for Maverick since we already diverted from Debian. ** Patch added: opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/622319/+attachment/1512691/+files/opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
New debdiff with patch header. ** Patch added: opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/622319/+attachment/1512715/+files/opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
New debdiff, second patch was mistakely left out. Sorry for the noise. ** Patch added: opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/622319/+attachment/1512716/+files/opensc_0.11.13-1ubuntu2.debdiff -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
Debdiff for lucid-proposed. ** Patch added: opensc_0.11.12-1ubuntu3.1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/622319/+attachment/1512988/+files/opensc_0.11.12-1ubuntu3.1.debdiff -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 579994] Re: version 0.11.12 is bad for Rutoken S tokens
Ubuntu will not update to 0.11.13 in Lucid. If you know of a precise bug, fill a proper bug report for it and it will be fixed if considered severe enough. Othewise, you may request a backport: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports#How%20to%20request%20new%20packages -- version 0.11.12 is bad for Rutoken S tokens https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/579994 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] [NEW] Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: opensc Lucid, OpenSC 0.11.12: fi...@tsukino ~ % dpkg -l | grep opensc ii libopensc2 0.11.12-1ubuntu3 Smart card library with support for PKCS#15 ii opensc 0.11.12-1ubuntu3 Smart card utilities with support for PKCS#1 fi...@tsukino ~ % lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 Codename: lucid How to reproduce: Initialise the smart card: fi...@tsukino ~ % pkcs15-init -E -C --label My Smart Card Using reader with a card: Feitian SCR301 00 00 New User PIN. Please enter User PIN: Please type again to verify: Unblock Code for New User PIN (Optional - press return for no PIN). Please enter User unblocking PIN (PUK): Please type again to verify: Generate RSA key: fi...@tsukino ~ % openssl genrsa -des3 -out mykey.key 1024 Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus ..++ ...++ e is 65537 (0x10001) Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: Verifying - Enter pass phrase for mykey.key: Try to story the key on the card: fi...@tsukino ~ % pkcs15-init -S mykey.key --auth-id ff --label My Private Key Using reader with a card: Feitian SCR301 00 00 Please enter passphrase to unlock secret key: User PIN required. Please enter User PIN: pkcs15-init: card-entersafe.c:1047: entersafe_encode_bignum: Assertion `0' failed. zsh: abort pkcs15-init -S mykey.key --auth-id ff --label My Private Key A fix exists (patch already comitted in upstream SVN): http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2010-January/013067.html http://www.mail-archive.com/opensc-de...@lists.opensc-project.org/msg05224.html Debdiff to follow applying both patches: - First patch fixes storing a key - Second patch fixes an unrelated bug that causes a segfault when trying to store a 2048-bit key (1024-bit key works fine with the first patch alone) Fix is SRU-worthy IMO. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: opensc 0.11.12-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.41-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Aug 22 17:55:01 2010 EcryptfsInUse: Yes InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Lucid Lynx - Release amd64 (20100429) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en LANG=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/zsh SourcePackage: opensc ** Affects: opensc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319/+attachment/1511025/+files/Dependencies.txt -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622319] Re: Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails
BTW, the bug also affects Maverick. I'll try to get it pushed into Debian first. ** Patch added: opensc_0.11.12-1ubuntu4.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/opensc/+bug/622319/+attachment/1511054/+files/opensc_0.11.12-1ubuntu4.debdiff -- Storing RSA key on EnterSafe smart card fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622319 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 616282] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build
Not a bug. You're trying to build the module against a kernel version it is not compatible with. The package is for Lucid, it is intended to be buily against a Lucid kernel, not a Maverick one. -- package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36 bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616282 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577627] [NEW] Shipped config file uses deprecated # comment
Public bug reported: In Lucid, the default config file shipped with the package starts its comment with a #. Such comments are deprecated in PHP 5.3, which causes warnings to appear (e.g. when PHP is used on the command-line). ** Affects: php-mcrypt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shipped config file uses deprecated # comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577627 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577627] Re: Shipped config file uses deprecated # comment
Attached debdiff fixes it. ** Patch added: php-mcrypt_5.3.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48092308/php-mcrypt_5.3.2-0ubuntu2.debdiff -- Shipped config file uses deprecated # comment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577627 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577591] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0
This is not a bug in drush but in php-mcrypt (#540208). -- PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577591 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 577232] Re: swapon/swapoff not as described in man page
-e (or --ifexists) is an option to swapon only and must be used in conjunction with -a, in wich case it tells swapon to skip devices that have a swap line in /etc/fstab but don't exist (without it swapon will throw an error if there is a swap line in /etc/fstab for a nonexistent device). -- swapon/swapoff not as described in man page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574494] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.33 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
If you don't have a menu.lst, GRUB will fail to update it. You must either answer y when GRUB asks if you want to have it create a menu.lst for you, or create one yourself. -- package linux-image-2.6.32-22-generic 2.6.32-22.33 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574494 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500410] Re: All OOo apps crash on startup
No, it's fixed now. -- All OOo apps crash on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500410] [NEW] All OOo apps crash on startup
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org Terminal output: % oocalc terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::bad_alloc' what(): std::bad_alloc All other OOo apps (base, impress, math, web, writer) give the same output. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Dec 25 20:59:05 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: openoffice.org 1:3.1.1-5ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/zsh ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-9.13-generic SourcePackage: openoffice.org Tags: lucid Uname: Linux 2.6.32-9-generic x86_64 ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- All OOo apps crash on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 500410] Re: All OOo apps crash on startup
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37190284/Dependencies.txt -- All OOo apps crash on startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500410 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
