[Bug 875040] Re: KMyMoney window cannot be resized smaller
Hi, I encountered the problem on two different Pc running Ubuntu 12.04. On the first one, which has a 1280x1024 display, upgrading kmm to version 4.6.3 (as per post #27) solved the problem. On the second, with a 1024x768 display, the upgrade to 4.6.3 did NOT solve the problem, the kmm window remains to large, by about 260 pixels (that's about 1280-1024). I guess that the default window width is hard coded somewhere. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875040 Title: KMyMoney window cannot be resized smaller To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmymoney/+bug/875040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
** Changed in: phatch (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
If I time-shift the original and the rotated image with Phatch (and attached command list: exif time shifting by +1 hour), the original image will be OK, but the rotated image will get as resulting exif time, not something based on the exif time, but one the file time. In my example, it results in 10/09/2011 11:23:11 for rotated image (instead of correct result of 21/05/2010 10:10:36 for original image after time shifting). I guess that whatever modification (or even e-mail sending!) is done on an image, the file time becomes different from the exif time, and unfortunately Phatch seems to only use file time as input, not exif time. ** Attachment added: "Phatch command list to shift exif time by 1h" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+attachment/2380966/+files/shift_1_hour.phatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
I attach then a rotated copy of the same image. Rotation was done with F-spot. The produced file kept the exit time of 21/05/2010 9:10:36, but the file time changed to 10/09/2011 10:23:11, which is the time when I rotated it (today). Note that if you download this file I guess that it will take the time at which you download it. Nevertheless, the point is that the exif time si now different from teh file time. ** Attachment added: "rotated image" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+attachment/2380876/+files/P5210009%20%28rotated%20copy%29.JPG -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
I attach here an example or original image. File time = exif time = 21/05/2010 9:10:36 ** Attachment added: "original image" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+attachment/2380875/+files/P5210009.JPG -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
** Description changed: - I have noticed that if I rotate image (horizontal > vertical) on a computer then thy to handle the exif date/time with Phatch, I get wrong date and time. + I have noticed that if I rotate images (horizontal > vertical) on a computer then thy to handle the exif date/time of those images with Phatch, I get wrong date and time. Example: original image (horizontal) date time is correctly seen by Phatch & Phatch image inspector (2011-08-14 10:09:36). - If I rotate it vertically (I used F-spot for this, but I had same problem with images which have been rotated under Windows explorer), then Phatch believes now its date is 2011-09-5 11:48:14, which is the time I rotated it, not the exif time. (Note that exif date time of rotated image is correct as shown by nautilus file browser). - I I try do to a "Time shift" with Phatch, even by selecting that I want to shift only the exif time, the result will be based on the file time as input. + If I rotate it vertically (I used F-spot for this, but I had the same problem with images which have been rotated under Windows explorer), then Phatch believes now its date is 2011-09-05 11:48:14, which is the time I rotated it, not the exif time. (Note that exif date time of rotated image is correct as shown by nautilus file browser). + If I try do to a "Time shift" with Phatch (even by selecting that I want to shift only the exif time) the result will be based on the file date time as input, not the exif date time Versions used: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Phatch 0.2.7 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: phatch 0.2.7-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.72-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 5 12:12:31 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20110719.2) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: - LANG=fr_FR.utf8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + LANG=fr_FR.utf8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: phatch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] Re: Bad date/time for rotated images
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 841701] [NEW] Bad date/time for rotated images
Public bug reported: I have noticed that if I rotate image (horizontal > vertical) on a computer then thy to handle the exif date/time with Phatch, I get wrong date and time. Example: original image (horizontal) date time is correctly seen by Phatch & Phatch image inspector (2011-08-14 10:09:36). If I rotate it vertically (I used F-spot for this, but I had same problem with images which have been rotated under Windows explorer), then Phatch believes now its date is 2011-09-5 11:48:14, which is the time I rotated it, not the exif time. (Note that exif date time of rotated image is correct as shown by nautilus file browser). I I try do to a "Time shift" with Phatch, even by selecting that I want to shift only the exif time, the result will be based on the file time as input. Versions used: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Phatch 0.2.7 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: phatch 0.2.7-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.72-generic 2.6.32.41+drm33.18 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 5 12:12:31 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20110719.2) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=fr_FR.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: phatch ** Affects: phatch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841701 Title: Bad date/time for rotated images To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phatch/+bug/841701/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 742994] Re: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742994 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 742994] [NEW] package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid Today, the PC requested to load several updates. The update process failed at least for one package (squid). What I know is that squid was running well before the update (together with squidguard, for internet site filtering. I had firefox running during the update). I saw tha failure only after I finished surfing (closed firefox) and when attempting to report the bug, the net filtering is out of order (firefox could not connect to the web) and I had to by pass it in order to sent the present bug report. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Sat Mar 26 09:39:18 2011 ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Netbook 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429.4) SourcePackage: squid Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid ubuntu-une -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/742994 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 705984] [NEW] conflict pane truncated with Notebook Edition
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: conduit I'm using Conduit 0.3.17 under Ubuntu Lucid Lynx Notebook Edition, with a 1024x600 screen Notebook. I've seen that when Conduit detects a conflict, the bottom of the conflict pane is out of reach. Moreover, when trying to drag the pane border to extend that pane (and decrease the Canvas pane), I'm stuck to what seems an uncompressible minimum height of the canvas pane (even though I only have one group, there is still plenty of unused space in that pane...), and I still have not enough room to see button for conflict resolution. I would expect 1) to be able to resize panes freely 2) that conflict resolving button be always visible when necessary to be used Only workaround found so far, to be able to use conduit before the bug is solved, is to use "Replace the older item" to solve conflicts automatically. lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 apt-cache policy conduit conduit: Installé : 0.3.17-1ubuntu1 Candidat : 0.3.17-1ubuntu1 Table de version : *** 0.3.17-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: conduit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/705984 Title: conflict pane truncated with Notebook Edition -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
