[Bug 1957711] [NEW] Switching users causes system crash

2022-01-12 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu 21.10

gdm3:
  Installed: 41~rc-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 41~rc-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 41~rc-0ubuntu2 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu impish/main amd64 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

Steps to reproduce:

1. Log in as any user
2. In the top right of the screen, click the power icon (⏻)
3. Select [Power Off/Log Out]
4. Select [Switch User]
5. Select any user that is NOT the user which is still currently logged in
6. Operating system is now frozen, mouse and keyboard don't respond, and user 
is never logged in.
7. Pressing [CTRL] + [ALT] + [DEL] appears to cause the system to crash

Apport.log: https://pastebin.com/srFwgfAh

** Affects: gdm3 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Crash log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957711/+attachment/5553637/+files/gdm3.0.crash

** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) => gdm3 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957711

Title:
  Switching users causes system crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdm3/+bug/1957711/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1954939] Re: Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name inside a zip archive

2021-12-16 Thread GB
I cannot report it upstream, their signup system does not accept any of
my email addresses.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954939

Title:
  Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name
  inside a zip archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1954939/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1954939] [NEW] Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name inside a zip archive

2021-12-15 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

This issue is very simple. A zip file can legally contain multiple
entries with the same name in the same path. If you attempt to open a
file that has the same name and path as another, you can only open one
of them, and cannot open the other.

An example zip file has been provided which contains two
`fabric.mod.json` files. If either one of them is double clicked within
file roller, it will only open one of them, and never the other.

example.zip
|
|
fabric.mod.json (2.1kb)
|
fabric.mod.json (484 bytes)

For me, the 484 byte file is always opened, even if you double click the
2.1kb file.

Ubuntu 21.10
file-roller 3.40.0-2

** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "Example zip file which can be used to demonstrate the 
issue"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954939/+attachment/5547843/+files/example.zip

** Summary changed:

- Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name inside a 
zip
+ Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name inside a 
zip archive

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1954939

Title:
  Cannot open additional instances of the same file with the same name
  inside a zip archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/1954939/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940534] [NEW] Notifications, Panel, Icons are all biased towards left monitor.

2021-08-19 Thread Zana GB
Public bug reported:

As explained on this thread with the Xubuntu twitter manager:
https://twitter.com/ZanaGB/status/1427328542786920454

The panel, icons, and notifications all defy the primary monitor
setting, and instead get biased towards the left.

Monitor orientation is irrelevant to the issue. Both monitors are 1440
pixels in height when they're both placed in landscape. On first boot
after install ( cannot test on live environment. Propietary NVidia
drivers are needed as Noveau produces no output. ) the panel, icons, and
notifications will be correctly shown on the right monitor. Opening the
display preferences pane and doing ANY change to the layout will make
everything migrate to the left monitor. Setting the primary monitor
toggle on the display does nothing. Changing the orientation of the left
display to portrait or landscape does nothing.

Everything stays on the left monitor.

Changing the secondary monitor to be on the right, regardless of
orientation, fixes the issue. Whichever monitor is on the left, is the
monitor where everything will be

Manually setting the output property inside panel preferences will
forcefully change the panel. Everything else will still not follow.

https://youtu.be/ZJIL87Jmr9Y

From the aforementioned thread. A video demonstrating the issue.

The bug may be related to bug #1596751, on which, despite the user's
first port mentions "rightmost". The rest of the posts and the attached
evidence shows that the panels stay to the "leftmost" monitor.

This in turn may be a descendant of Bug #8328 on the old XFCE bug
tracker, and https://forum.xfce.org/viewtopic.php?id=6440 this 2011
entry on the official XFCE forums detailing the same exact issue.

As a result of the Xubuntu's twitter and I's back and forth and the
delays implied in that. I have since installed a different distribution
to suit my needs. Installing to a ejectable drive multiple times
resulted on the installer crashing halfway through the process. So i
can't boot from any secondary media to further testing.

I will happily provide additional testing if there's a way to get the
latest nvidia-driver metapackage ( and corresponding kernel modules )
working directly into the live installer.

** Affects: xubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: monitor primary xfce

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940534

Title:
  Notifications, Panel, Icons are all biased towards left monitor.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-meta/+bug/1940534/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-31 Thread GB
@eyallior not exactly the same, I don't get;
...
INFO failed to remove python-minimal
...
INFO failed to remove libpython-stdlib

my case seems worst that your!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-30 Thread GB
@Daniel, after cleanning a LOT (removing everything from 
/etc/apt/source.list.d/ and expurging /etc/apt/source.list this is what i get...
Any idea? (I'm afraid I must remove python-minimal... and so remove mate*!)

** Attachment added: "do-release-upgrade.log.tgz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+attachment/5429613/+files/do-release-upgrade.log.tgz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-30 Thread GB
@Daniel, Here it is. Thank you!

** Attachment added: "apt.log.tgz"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+attachment/5429607/+files/apt.log.tgz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-30 Thread GB
Hello Daniel,

I ran ppa-purge on them.

Do you have an idea how to detect the packages causing the trouble?

Thank you!

Guillaume

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-30 Thread GB
I disabled all my PPA's...
I still cannot do-release-upgrade

grep Broken /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log |wc
   1405   17699  153251

Does it mean i have to remove all "Broken" 1405 packages ?!

Thank you for your help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889250] Re: Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

2020-10-13 Thread GB
Hi Brian,

I did remove nodejs and related packages and I tried again.

The result is the same. I'll open a new bug report.

Where did you check to say nodejs was responsible?

Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Title:
  Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1889250/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1898358] Re: do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable) packages on the system !

2020-10-13 Thread GB
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250

Hi Brian,

I did remove nodejs and related packages and I tried again.

The result is the same. I'll open a new bug report.

Where did you check to say nodejs was responsible?

Thanks.

Guillaume

Le 05/10/2020 à 23:50, Brian Murray a écrit :
> *** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1889250 ***
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889250
>
> Reviewing the files from your upgrade attempt you have installed nodejs
> from a location other than the offical Ubuntu archive. This version of
> nodejs is greater than the one in the official archive and is keeping
> some python packages installed which then prevents the upgrade from
> being calculated. Please remove nodejs along with any other packages
> from that archive and disable the archive. After that you can try
> upgrading again and if it still fails open a new bug report. Thanks and
> good luck!
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Invalid
>
> ** Tags added: nodesource-nodejs
>
> ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1889250
>Unable to calculate the upgrade to 20.04 due to nodejs from nodesource
>
-- 
Guillaume Ballet
https://keys.openpgp.org
que...@laposte.net
36DAA9ACBCECCBBF15F7A53AF4F5B83C70C3788C

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898358

Title:
  do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable)
  packages on the system !

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898358/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898358] Re: do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable) packages on the system !

2020-10-03 Thread GB
The system is ;
>$ lsb_release -a
LSB Version:
core-9.20170808ubuntu1-noarch:printing-9.20170808ubuntu1-noarch:security-9.20170808ubuntu1-noarch
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04
Codename:   bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898358

Title:
  do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable)
  packages on the system !

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898358/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898358] [NEW] do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable) packages on the system !

2020-10-03 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

do-release-upgrade to focal failed because non standard (and non detectable) 
packages on the system.
>
sudo apt-mark unhold ...
sudo ppa-purge ...
sudo apt updated
sudo apt upgrade
sudo do-release-upgrade
...
   

Vérification du gestionnaire de paquets
Lecture des listes de paquets… Terminé
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances
Lecture des informations d'état… Terminé  

Calcul des modifications en cours

Calcul des modifications en cours

Impossible d'évaluer la mise à niveau

Un problème insoluble est survenu lors du calcul de la mise à niveau.

Cela a probablement été causé par : 
* des paquets logiciels non officiels qui ne proviennent pas 
d’Ubuntu. 
Veuillez utiliser la commande « ppa-purge » du paquet 
« ppa-purge » afin de supprimer les paquets d’un 
dépôt PPA Launchpad, puis essayez de relancer la mise à niveau. 

Si rien de tout cela ne s'applique, signalez ce bogue à l'aide de la 
commande « ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core » dans un 
terminal. Si vous souhaitez analyser le problème par vous-même, les 
fichiers journaux contenus dans le répertoire « /var/log/dist-upgrade 
» contiennent les informations sur la mise à niveau. Plus 
précisément, veuillez consulter les journaux « main.log » et « 
apt.log ». 


Restauration du système dans son état d'origine

Annulation
Lecture des listes de paquets… Terminé
Construction de l'arbre des dépendances
Lecture des informations d'état… Terminé  

=== Command detached from window (Sat Oct  3 14:40:18 2020) ===
=== Command terminated with exit status 1 (Sat Oct  3 14:40:28 2020) ===

Nothing wrong on cat /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log
cryptic error on /var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log
...
2020-10-03 14:40:15,979 ERROR Dist-upgrade failed: 'E:Erreur, 
pkgProblem::Resolve a généré des ruptures, ce qui a pu être causé par les 
paquets devant être gardés en l'état.'
...

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:18.04.38
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: vtsspp sep5 socperf3 pax nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.17
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Sat Oct  3 14:47:18 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-03-07 (1305 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Release amd64 (20161012.2)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2020-10-03 (0 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic dist-upgrade

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898358

Title:
  do-release-upgrade to focal failed due to non standard (undetectable)
  packages on the system !

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1898358/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1085706] Re: pam_ecryptfs: seteuid error

2017-11-16 Thread GB
xscreenserver on Ubuntu 16.10 affected
nov. 16 14:10:13 clevo.gigi.edu xscreensaver[24025]: pam_ecryptfs: seteuid error

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1085706

Title:
  pam_ecryptfs: seteuid error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ecryptfs/+bug/1085706/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1628439] Re: login loop on lightdm-greeter

2017-03-17 Thread GB
Not a bug. corrupted xinputrc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439

Title:
  login loop on lightdm-greeter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1628439] Re: login loop on lightdm-greeter

2017-03-17 Thread GB
I realized that .xinputrc was corrupted due to the fact that im-config was 
using an non official md5sum build!
For that reason, the bus couldn't sucessfully complete its initialization and 
gvfs couldn't launch itself.
With the use the official md5sum (from coreutils), the .xinputrc was corrected 
and I could launch the graphical environment automaticaly again without issue 
(sudo systemctl set-default graphical.target --force)
The gvfs error was gone away from syslog.

Guillaume

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439

Title:
  login loop on lightdm-greeter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1079552] Re: Unexpectedly asks for authentication halfway through file restore process

2017-01-16 Thread GB Mel
This is still a problem in ubuntu 16.04 Xenial.
In my situation, I have a number of missing files to restore, let's say six.
I run "restore missing files" from the Files right-click option,
then for every missing file, I have to type in my user password for 
authentication.
This means that I have to do this six times during the restore process.
The message is -
"Authentication is needed to run ‘/bin/sh’ as the super user
An application is attempting to perform an action that requires privileges. 
Authentication is required to perform this action."

Perhaps there might be a way to allow "/bin/sh" to run without needing 
authentication?
(I configured Backups to restore without a password)

The best workaround I can come up with so far is to run deja-dup with sudo at 
the command line -
$ sudo deja-dup --restore-missing file:///
This way I only have to enter my user password once, and right at the beginning.

No authentication was needed to run the backup - it's confusing to need
it for the restore.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1079552

Title:
  Unexpectedly asks for authentication halfway through file restore
  process

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/deja-dup/+bug/1079552/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1628439] Re: login loop on lightdm-greeter

2016-09-28 Thread GB
** Attachment added: "syslog"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+attachment/4750062/+files/fuck6

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439

Title:
  login loop on lightdm-greeter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1628439] Re: login loop on lightdm-greeter

2016-09-28 Thread GB
** Attachment added: "auth"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+attachment/4750063/+files/fuck7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439

Title:
  login loop on lightdm-greeter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1628439] [NEW] login loop on lightdm-greeter

2016-09-28 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

After an upgrade of the system not possible anymore to login using 
lightdm-greeter.
Tried dpkg-reconfigure on all major DM package - no success
Looking for errors in PAM - no authentication errors
Looking for errors in syslog ;
org.gtk.vfs.Daemon[7528]: A connection to the bus can't be made

seems same problem that Bug #1571206 reported by dino99 on 2016-04-16
but with different symptoms.

Workaround ; put the system boot into text mode then "startx" works everytime
(and doesn't trigger gvfs error)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: gvfs 1.28.2-1ubuntu1~16.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-38.57-generic 4.4.19
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-38-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Wed Sep 28 11:28:04 2016
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-06-01 (118 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 
(20160420.1)
SourcePackage: gvfs
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gvfs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial

** Attachment added: "This file describe the upgrade of the system - before 
apply it works, after it fails"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439/+attachment/4750058/+files/fuck4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628439

Title:
  login loop on lightdm-greeter

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/+bug/1628439/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 806761] Re: Feature Request: Upstart scripts for nslcd

2014-10-18 Thread GB
Our nslcd (0.8.4) keeps crashing on Ubuntu 12.04, like so:

[2221821.130260] nslcd[17641]: segfault at 0 ip 004159c8 sp 
7f11fd78b6a0 error 4 in nslcd[40+21000]
[4448958.894131] nslcd[31759]: segfault at 0 ip 004159c8 sp 
7fa87d3826a0 error 4 in nslcd[40+21000]

and then it does not restart.

Would having a /etc/init/nslcd.conf (with an appropriate respawn) fix
this issue, or is there a way to fix it within the old 'service'
framework?

Any help would be appreciated - whenever it crashes (which happens every
few weeks) some user with a local account has to log on and restart it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806761

Title:
  Feature Request: Upstart scripts for nslcd

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nss-pam-ldapd/+bug/806761/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1096286]

2013-01-07 Thread Moz-en-gb
bug 348023 has some pointers to that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1096286

Title:
  Firefox Search Engine is Broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1096286/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994749] Re: checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

2012-05-05 Thread GB
Ok, I purged ureadahead, the problem persists.

Attached is an updated bootchart, which also shows a process called
'mountall' running before 30checkfs.sh


** Attachment added: "bootchart that runs mountall before 30checkfs.sh"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/994749/+attachment/3132696/+files/theta-precise-20120505-2.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994749

Title:
  checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/994749/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994749] Re: checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

2012-05-05 Thread GB
I'm not sure why you flagged this as 'util-linux"

I think the culprit may be ureadahead

Please see the attached bootchart.

ureadahead calls mountall before 30checkfs.sh runs.

Why?


** Attachment added: "theta-precise-20120505-1.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/994749/+attachment/3132695/+files/theta-precise-20120505-1.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994749

Title:
  checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/994749/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994749] Re: checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

2012-05-04 Thread GB
I did some further sleuthing.  Here's the excerpt from dmesg where
sda4/sda2 are mounted:

[   13.278025] nvidia :01:00.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
[   13.278033] nvidia :01:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
[   13.278036] vgaarb: device changed decodes: 
PCI::01:00.0,olddecodes=io+mem,decodes=none:owns=io+mem
[   13.278145] NVRM: loading NVIDIA UNIX x86_64 Kernel Module  295.40  Thu Apr  
5 21:37:00 PDT 2012
[   13.487250] EXT4-fs (sda1): re-mounted. Opts: errors=remount-ro
[   13.973519] EXT4-fs (sda2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: 
(null)
[   14.168728] EXT4-fs (sda4): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: 
(null)
[   14.315352] EXT4-fs (sdb3): warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is 
recommended
[   14.321058] EXT4-fs (sdb3): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. Opts: 
(null)
[   14.344202] init: failsafe main process (1163) killed by TERM signal
[   14.401456] Bluetooth: Core ver 2.16


Note the 'failsafe main process  killed by TERM signal'...

Could it be that you're mounting the sda2/sda4 partitions just
temporarily, but then fail to unmount them?

On a related note, I need to update the bug report.

On 10.04, before upgrading to 12.04, I was able to Ctrl-Alt-F7 to reach
the maintenance shell and kill it. But sshd didn't start.

On 12.04, I'm no longer able to Ctrl-Alt out of plymouth (no getty has
been started), but at least sshd has now started, allowing my to log on
remotely and kill the maintenance shell.

Am I right that the 'failsafe main process ... killed by TERM signal'
may be the culprit?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994749

Title:
  checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/994749/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 994749] [NEW] checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

2012-05-04 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

I had Ubuntu 10.04 LTS installed, now upgraded to 12.04 Precise.

When the system enters run state 'S', it attempts to fsck two mounted
file systems. This causes it to drop into a maintenance shell,
preventing other system services (sshd, etc. etc. ) from starting until
the maintenance is entered.

However, it does progress to running gdm and gives a prompt to login (X
is running on tty1 then).

Ctrl-Alt-F7 leads to the maintenance shell, exiting it makes the boot
complete.

/var/log/checkfs is
--
Log of fsck -C -R -A -a 
Fri May  4 15:40:13 2012

fsck from util-linux 2.19.1
/dev/sda2 is mounted.  e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.

/dev/sda4 is mounted.  e2fsck: Cannot continue, aborting.

fsck died with exit status 8

Fri May  4 15:40:13 2012


My /etc/fstab:

proc/proc   procnodev,noexec,nosuid 0   0
/dev/sda1   /   ext4errors=remount-ro 0   1
/dev/sda2   /home   ext4defaults0   2
UUID=02e8ad70-9e55-41e3-85be-42d7edf07c5e /optext4defaults  
  0   2
/dev/sda3   noneswapsw  0   0
/dev/sdb3   /media/gbackext4rw  0   0

(The device with UUID=02e... is /dev/sda4).

My question: how in the world can it happen that your checkfs.sh runs
'fsck -C -R -A -a' *apparently after* you've mounted all configured
filesystems read-write?  This would fail deterministically, as it does
for me. Clearly, something must be wrong with my installation, but what?
I did not make any changes to /etc/rc*/*

Any insights/hints for what I could try?

As is, I can't reboot the machine remotely because it never gets to
starting the network/sshd, which is highly annoying. I need to
physically exit the maintenance shell.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: boot checkfs failure maintenance shell

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994749

Title:
  checkfs run on already mounted filesystem, preventing boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/994749/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 748550] Re: Dash Icons are too large

2011-11-22 Thread GB Mel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 735509 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/735509

I don't agree that this problem is a duplicate of #73509.
I'm using Ubuntu 11.10 and have resorted to the "classic" gnome desktop to 
avoid this probem in the unity desktop.
The problem here is that the application icons are so large that only 8 (eight) 
will fit on my 10" netbook screen
(in two rows of 4). With over a hundred applications, this means a lot of 
scrolling to find what I want.
By comparison, my 3.5" smartphone screen shows 20 icons on one screen.
Icons and text should be independent. In fact the whole point of icons (my 
opinion) is to not need text.
I would request that the icon size be a user option with a wide range of size 
values, and the descriptive text only be shown
as a mouse-over, to help when learning to recognise the icons.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/748550

Title:
  Dash Icons are too large

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/748550/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 793226] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61 failed to install/upgrade: grub-probe fails for NFS root filesystem

2011-06-05 Thread GB
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793226

Title:
  package linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61 failed to
  install/upgrade: grub-probe fails for NFS root filesystem

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 793226] [NEW] package linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61 failed to install/upgrade: grub-probe fails for NFS root filesystem

2011-06-05 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: grub2

Please don't bail if / is not a mounted hard drive. Just ignore the
failure.

(I'm running a diskless Ubuntu install.  Upgrading


Setting up linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic (2.6.32-31.61) ...
Running depmod.
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-31-generic
Running postinst hook script /usr/sbin/update-grub.
/usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: cannot find a device for / (is /dev mounted?).

Perhaps the postinst hook script could test for this condition or simply
proceed.

Just update the initramfs and vmlinuz files - I'll copy them over to
where my tftp server keeps them.

Thanks.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-30.59-generic 2.6.32.29+drm33.13
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-30-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AptOrdering:
 linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic: Configure
 linux-image-2.6.32-32-generic: Configure
 linux-image-generic: Configure
 linux-generic: Configure
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Jun  5 14:42:53 2011
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
SourcePackage: grub2
Title: package linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61 failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 1

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid ubuntu-une

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/793226

Title:
  package linux-image-2.6.32-31-generic 2.6.32-31.61 failed to
  install/upgrade: grub-probe fails for NFS root filesystem

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


RE: [Bug 627191] Re: no cursor when coming out of sleep

2010-09-15 Thread gb

no i can't see the cursor at all


> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 03:17:58 +
> From: a...@alexandos.org
> To: gsavag...@hotmail.com
> Subject: [Bug 627191] Re: no cursor when coming out of sleep
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we cannot work on this bug because your
> description didn't include enough information. What exactly happens when
> you pull the laptop out of sleep? Is it a screen something like this:
> http://toastytech.com/guis/ubuntu10lock.png ?
> 
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>Status: New => Incomplete
> 
> -- 
> no cursor when coming out of sleep
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627191
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
> 
> Status in Ubuntu: Incomplete
> 
> Bug description:
> when i pull my laptop out of sleep i can't see the cursor
> 
> To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/627191/+subscribe

-- 
no cursor when coming out of sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627191
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 627191] [NEW] no cursor when coming out of sleep

2010-08-30 Thread gb
Public bug reported:

when i pull my laptop out of sleep i can't see the cursor

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
no cursor when coming out of sleep
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/627191
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 239351] Re: missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole upgrade...

2008-11-01 Thread GB
I would like to close the thread - because I redid the system. Thanks.

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:08 AM, IanW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
> Ubuntu better. You reported this bug a while ago and there hasn't been
> any activity in it recently. We were wondering is this still an issue
> for you? Can you try with latest Ubuntu release? Thanks in advance.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>   Status: New => Incomplete
>
> --
> missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole
> upgrade...
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239351
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
> Status in Ubuntu: Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
> Failed to fetch
> http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/e/esound/libesd-alsa0_0.2.38-0ubuntu9_i386.deb
>  Error reading from server - read (104 Connection reset by peer) [IP:
> 91.189.88.31 80]
>
> After letting apt-get dist-upgrade run the entire afternoon and night, and
> waking up to realise just this had made it fail is kind of frustrating.
> Tried to ping the IP address given, but not available. Port 80 also not.
>

-- 
missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole 
upgrade...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239351
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 239351] Re: missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole upgrade...

2008-06-11 Thread GB
Oh, but it does work as a link... I can manage to download it from
firefox say.

-- 
missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole 
upgrade...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239351
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 239351] [NEW] missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole upgrade...

2008-06-11 Thread GB
Public bug reported:

Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/e/esound
/libesd-alsa0_0.2.38-0ubuntu9_i386.deb  Error reading from server - read
(104 Connection reset by peer) [IP: 91.189.88.31 80]

After letting apt-get dist-upgrade run the entire afternoon and night,
and waking up to realise just this had made it fail is kind of
frustrating. Tried to ping the IP address given, but not available. Port
80 also not.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
missing alsa installation file during apt-get dist-upgrade crashes whole 
upgrade...
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239351
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 123574] Re: Upgrade strongswan to latest version

2007-08-12 Thread gb
** Also affects: strongswan (Baltix)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Upgrade strongswan to latest version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs