[Bug 236272] Re: Latest kernel upgrade (2.6.24-17 generic) made me lose my suspend feature, reverted back to 16
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 226279 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/226279 Confirmed, -17 fails for both suspend and hiberation, but -16 works just fine. -- Latest kernel upgrade (2.6.24-17 generic) made me lose my suspend feature, reverted back to 16 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236272 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235274] Re: After updates laptop can't suspend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux- source-2.6.20/+bug/236272 -- After updates laptop can't suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235274 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32963] Re: totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast)
Since nothing seems to work for me as far as driver replacements go, I've developed my own analysis and workaround for the problem, which I'll share here in case people find it useful: OK, now according to xvattr, my default values for brightness, contrast and saturation are 0, 64 and 128 respectively. I do not use Totem, I hate the GUI, but I do like using SMPlayer for most videos and VLC for DVD playback. There are two problems though: * The default values above are actually a little too high, even though they look like sensible defaults. For some reason, even after verifying the defaults are not being modified in something like VLC (which doesn't move them around at all), blacks are not entirely black and hence everything's slightly too bright. * SMPlayer, unlike regular MPlayer, does like to modify the color values and screws things up entirely. Hence, there are two tasks: * To change the default values to something sensible so that VLC can show blacks as proper blacks and hence everything looks good. * To stop SMPlayer from fuxxoring with the values itself. After experimentation, I discovered that the issue of blacks could be fixed if XV_BRIGHTNESS was reduced to about -12, but everything else looked bright enough to be reasonable. I also discovered that if I ran if I ran MPlayer with the following parameters: -contrast -49 -brightness -9 -saturation -75 This would adjust all the balances to such that things would look fine. To stop SMPlayer from going screwey, I went to the advanced section of the options menu, put these parameters in the additional parameters section, and so SMplayer worked beautifully. Also, VLC would show nice blacks and colors if I ran SMPlayer at least once before, since it would adjust the brightness as part of the new settings I gave it. So yeah, that's what I did. A bit of a shame that an open-source driver has this bug which cannot seem to be fixed and yet closed-source binary blobs from NVIDIA work just fine, but there you go. Hope that's useful to someone. :) -- totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32963 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32963] Re: totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast)
OK, that's three reasons. Guess I can't count. :D -- totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32963 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32963] Re: totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast)
@Thomas: Yeah, I'm using the unpatched driver for two reasons - (1) The prebuilt version you've linked before is older than what's currently available in the repos, (2) I don't want to build the driver myself, and (3) when I tried the patched driver anyway, nothing changed for me. As for the neutral settings for everything, the problem is that they aren't actually neutral. I've seen what my videos should look like in Windows, and blacks are black. These are not, not even with VLC, so that's why I had to modify things. Also, I still needed to resolve the issue with SMplayer messing with the colors, and that's my favorite player. I'm using an Intel X3100 (965GM) in case it's important. In any case, it's a solution that's worked for me, so I'm sticking with it. :) -- totem overrides XV_CONSTRAST/XV_SATURATION to wrong default value (Xv movies on i810/i945 have horrible colour/gamma/contrast) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32963 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209654] Re: workspace switcher colours are unclear
I think it's too late to do anything about this - HardyArtworkFinalDeadline was passed on March 13th, and I think theme colors count. You can use the gnome-color-chooser, I think it's in the hardy universe repo now, to modify this if you want. -- workspace switcher colours are unclear https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209647] Re: [Hardy] No interfaces when starting wireshark from menu
Confirmed, this is I suppose an oversight rather than a bug (splitting hairs?) The problem stems from the fact that regular users do not have sufficient privileges to capture packets, so the interfaces are not shown. http://wiki.wireshark.org/CaptureSetup/CapturePrivileges explains this in a little more detail. Elevating privileges using gksu would do the job nicely I think, as a suggestion. -- [Hardy] No interfaces when starting wireshark from menu https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209647 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151499] Re: alt+tab crashes emerald
**SOLUTION** **SOLUTION** **SOLUTION** I have found the solution! (at least for me)... Load up the CompizConfig Settings Manager, and under the section of options marked Utility, DISABLE Regex Matching. I have gotten to a stage where I could reproduce the crashing of emerald at will (by alt- tabbing between two open gnome terminals), but when I disabled regex matching, all the problems went away and I couldn't get it to crash anylonger. I'm not sure how important regex matching is. I hear it's used for a few other plugins, but I haven't seen anything major as a result of disabling it. So there you go. :) -- alt+tab crashes emerald https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151499] Re: alt+tab crashes emerald
Confirmed, have the same problem here in Gutsy 64-bit. Alt-tab is not guaranteed to crash Emerald all the time, but it is the source of all crashes it would seem. -- alt+tab crashes emerald https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
