[Bug 1054776] Re: Don't include remote searches in the home lens
You're going to send all of my application and file searches to Amazon? How can this not be a flagrant violation of my privacy? As much as I like Ubuntu, this feature is going to make me switch back to Debian and donate $10 a year to them. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054776 Title: Don't include remote searches in the home lens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-lens-shopping/+bug/1054776/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745973] [NEW] package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: sbackup Failed to upgrade to 11.04 alpha. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-7.39-generic 2.6.38 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 30 16:09:02 2011 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 Maverick Meerkat - Release amd64 (20101007) SourcePackage: sbackup Title: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-03-30 (0 days ago) ** Affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745973 Title: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 745973] Re: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/745973 Title: package sbackup-gtk 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 685577] Re: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows.
It's really annoying for anyone running a large-resolution display. Too much netbook thinking for the desktop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/685577 Title: Launcher gets in the way when trying to close maximized windows. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160311] Re: Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult [please no more comments; patches welcome]
Whatever solution you people come up with for 11.04 makes no difference to me, but holy heck this needs to be fixed. It's embarrassing to have a 100 Paper Cuts project without this being on it. If you're going to make a 1 pixel border on your default theme, you'd better figure out a way for people to resize the window. -- Resizing windows by grabbing window borders is difficult [please no more comments; patches welcome] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160311 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277524] Re: ptrdiff_t undefined if stddef.h is included after wchar.h and wctype.h
We encountered this issue recently while trying to compile against third-party header files. Is there any chance of this being fixed soon? -- ptrdiff_t undefined if stddef.h is included after wchar.h and wctype.h https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277524 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480665] Re: rejecting I/O to offline device
Now running patch 21 and still having the problem. Two weeks to the release date and no ticket updates or responses. Good job. Keep up the good work. -- rejecting I/O to offline device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480665] Re: rejecting I/O to offline device
I'm now running 2.6.32-20 and it's still an issue. Is this slated to be fixed upstream? Is there a certain patch we can watch for? -- rejecting I/O to offline device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480665] Re: rejecting I/O to offline device
I am now using the 2.6.32-19 kernel and still having this problem. This issue is still unassigned and there hasn't been an update to the ticket in two weeks. -- rejecting I/O to offline device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542736] Re: buttons are too dark and blurry
I agree that the buttons are too dark. There's certainly not enough contrast for my old eyes on the bottom panel. Does that patch work with that latest update to Radiance? I couldn't seem to find the section indicated. -- buttons are too dark and blurry https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542736 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 480665] Re: rejecting I/O to offline device
No status updates for the past week on this? I am having the same problem on 10.04 beta 1, using the 2.6.32-17 kernel. [ 678.102158] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102180] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102196] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102210] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102224] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102246] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102261] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102275] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102289] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.102312] sd 13:0:0:0: rejecting I/O to offline device [ 678.320411] usb 1-3.2: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 16 [ 678.418140] usb 1-3.2: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice [ 678.424168] scsi14 : SCSI emulation for USB Mass Storage devices [ 678.424432] usb-storage: device found at 16 [ 678.424437] usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning [ 683.433031] usb-storage: device scan complete [ 683.478131] scsi 14:0:0:0: Direct-Access SAMSUNG HD103UJ PQ: 0 ANSI: 2 CCS [ 683.478566] sd 14:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 [ 683.577971] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] 1953525168 512-byte logical blocks: (1.00 TB/931 GiB) [ 683.578713] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off [ 683.578716] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 34 00 00 00 [ 683.578718] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 683.580693] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 683.580697] sdb: sdb1 [ 683.591935] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through [ 683.591940] sd 14:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk [ 691.061226] usb 1-3.2: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 16 [ 700.064647] usb 1-3.2: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 16 -- rejecting I/O to offline device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 402188] Re: gvim complains about gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed in the shell it's started from
I am fully updated with the release candidate and all updates to 28 October '09 and I am still getting this error message. -- gvim complains about gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion `static_gravity_supported' failed in the shell it's started from https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 395608] [NEW] Update qwt5 to Qwt 5.2.0 for Koala
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libqwt5-qt4 The 5.2.0 release of Qwt has been out since Mar. '09 and should be included in 9.10 by default. This would allow for making .deb packages that depend on it. Thanks ** Affects: qwt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: qwt -- Update qwt5 to Qwt 5.2.0 for Koala https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395608 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
