[Bug 780356] Re: upgrade-usbids not working any more
It seems that the new home for usb.ids is in https://usb- ids.gowdy.us/index.html (from the same mainainer). About the difference file: I think they are some old leftover, when there was not real maintainer of usb.ids, so many people/package maintained a own update version. IIRC debian has a tools to merge different ids files. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780356 Title: upgrade-usbids not working any more -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780356] Re: upgrade-usbids not working any more
And the original site has restored, so the bug can be closed. ** Changed in: usbutils (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780356 Title: upgrade-usbids not working any more -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780356] Re: upgrade-usbids not working any more
The domain linux-usb.org expired, so temporarily we don't have upstream usb.ids -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780356 Title: upgrade-usbids not working any more -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 569488] Re: update-intel-microcode does not find latest available microcode update
On 11.08.2010 09:27, Moritz Naumann wrote: Since this package is currently broken in Lucid (10.04), which is a https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS release, and since this update also fixes a possible security issue (as Stefano pointed out in his 'Do not eval() code from the Internet' changelog statement), I would assume this qualifies for https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates and would appreciate one taking place. I've heard about 'Do not eval() code from the Internet', but there are not such eval and unsecure things. The shell code was designed to be safe, and I've not yet seen problems. It do the same things as the python code, probably using the same code (C library to do the core things), with the same security. BTW I plan to push the ubuntu python code also in Debian package, and asking for a unblock (python code is somewhat more manageable than shell, considering that Intel cannot really have a stable method to release new firmware). PS: and done correctly, e.g. the ubuntu patch lacked of python dependency. ciao cate -- update-intel-microcode does not find latest available microcode update https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569488 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173675] Re: g15daemon: Fail to install when required hardware is not present
This was solved in Debian, release 1.9.5.3-5 (using udev to start the deamon, and subsequent fixes for USB shared devices). The solution seems working, although it is not a nice solution. The real solution will requires reimplementing libg15 with a newer libusb API (working in progress). -- g15daemon: Fail to install when required hardware is not present https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 501613] Re: g15daemon does not claim interface before use
I think this bug is solved in debian starting from 1.9.5.3-5: udev rule will detach and reattach correctly the deamon. -- g15daemon does not claim interface before use https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/501613 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422473] Re: g15daemon dumps screenshots without being asked
IMO pressing M1+M3 is asking for screen shots (like the print screen key). But I agree that a configuration option should allow disabling the M1+M3 keys. I'll investigate this. Note that newer Debian revisions create the file in a more safe (and stable) manner. More debug is need to discover what key sequence caused the screenshots. BTW what keyboard do you have? -- g15daemon dumps screenshots without being asked https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 397308] Re: jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM
3GB is the maximum *sane* value of memory for 32-bits architectures. Part of the extra gigabyte is used by hardware (IO-mapped memory, etc). Having 64GB in 32-bit is a hack (in hardware and software), very slow, and change a lot of interns of linux kernel (all vm part), thus breaking all binary modules. Thus we need two version: one more compatible, and one for much more memory. Considering that 32-bit machines are also the oldest one, we cannot slow down so much the low-end computers (which cannot go to 64-bit). I really suggest you to go to 64-bit. 64-bit can run 32-bit code (but do some tests to see if ubuntu support all 32bit libraries in 64-bit). You can also run 32-bit virtual machines. At some point your company need to go at 64-bit, so it is better to think already now how to have the dual bit environment. -- jaunty 32b cannot see more than 3023M RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 318837] Re: gstreamer will not install codecs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173675 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173675 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 173675 package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- gstreamer will not install codecs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/318837 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272071] Re: New format on Intel website make update-intel-microcode unusable
Debian unblocked it, now it is in lenny -- New format on Intel website make update-intel-microcode unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 271336] [NEW] E: g15 deamon: le s ous-processus post-installationscript à retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
Thank for the bug report! The commands: /etc/init.d/g15daemon stop dpkg --configure --pending will solve the problem. Later I'll review the postinst script, to handle better the case of upgrades. ciao cate -- E: g15 deamon: le sous-processus post-installationscript à retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272071] [NEW] New format on Intel website make update-intel-microcode unusable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: microcode.ctl The new microcodes are distributed ad tar.gz (of a single plaintext file) instead of the raw plaintext file. I've corrected the new update- intel-microcode script, so that it understand also the new format. Additionally an other small bug is corrected. The correction are only on update-intel-microcode script, which now it is unusable. The main part of package are untouched. So I ask you to update to new Debian unstable version (1.17-9). I've asked unblock also on Debian. ** Affects: microcode.ctl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- New format on Intel website make update-intel-microcode unusable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272071 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 272068] [NEW] new upstream version with new fixes for Intel CPU
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: intel-microcode Intel just released a new version of microcode (fix to CPU bugs), and asked to me and Ubuntu to update it (see mails kernel- [EMAIL PROTECTED]). Few days ago I updated the package in Debian, and I'm requesting unblock also for Debian lenny. ** Affects: intel-microcode (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- new upstream version with new fixes for Intel CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/272068 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254365] Re: libg15render package can't be installed!
I think it is not a bug of Ubuntu: libg15 and libg15render (as binary package) are never distributed by Ubuntu. I think you built the packages from upstream, which debian/ was not really policy compliant (i.e. without soname in package name). For this reason it never show up in my tests. PS: you should manually remove the g15 packages you built and then install it from ubuntu ** Changed in: libg15render (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- libg15render package can't be installed! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254365] Re: libg15render package can't be installed!
I think it is my error: I should add a: Replace: libg15render (and Replace: libg15 for the other package) ciao cate -- libg15render package can't be installed! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254365 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224136] Re: G15daemon post-installation script error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 173675 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173675 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 173675 package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- G15daemon post-installation script error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224136 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173675] Re: package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Can I assume that you don't have a G15 keyboard? Anyway I'll correct in next (1.9.1.0.svn346-2 or later) version. -- package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 173675] Re: package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
siucdude wrote: No I do not but on previous version, this package worked for my Logitech MX5000, it allowed me to have some shortcuts. what previous version? This is the first version in Ubuntu: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/g15daemon libg15 1.2.3 has some problem with non G15 keyboard, so maybe the update libg15 1.2.2 to 1.2.3 caused you the problem. The version 1.2.4 (not yet in Ubuntu) corrected some compatibility problem. ciao cate -- package g15daemon 1.9.0-wip.20070910-5 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123145] Re: package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
Debian 1.17-2 fix this problem ** Changed in: microcode.ctl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123145] Re: package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
The first issue should be corrected in Debian 1.17-2: I do better error checking and I handle better debconf The cause: the device was not found (no module loaded?) so postinst calls MAKEDEV, and MAKEDEV prints an error. debconf doesn't like console output (in particolar when debconf helper script are called in the wrong place (to late)). Anyway Debian 1.17-2 is correct. The second report is not an issue ;-): The first part: If you run it manually, you should have also kernel/hardware support. The init.d script load the module, but I think it is not task of the program to load module (see devfsd vs. udev discussions). But then it would be an other question: should udev load the module (hardware found) at boot timet?. Maybe I will add some more info on man page. The second part: it is correct. the microcode kernel driver have two loading methods: the old method with special device /dev/cpu/microcode and a loader microcode.ctl;and a new method, using firmware kernel infrastructure (which print the warning). Unfortunately the second method is still in development. I think Intel will release it this summer. Anyway, maybe firmware_helper should be improved, because it should be a warning and not an error, and the driver '(unknown) is not correct ;-) -- package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 123145] Re: package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128
Note: this bug affect only 1.16-1 and 1.17-1 microcode.ctl version The new kernel microcode loading infrastructure is include only in kernels 2.6.18 and later. -- package microcode.ctl 1.17-1 failed to install: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 128 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123145 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92552] Re: microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID
In the version 1.17-1 I've transformed the date into numbers, so now scripts really check = -- microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 92552] Re: microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID
as debian upstream (for download scripts) ** Changed in: microcode.ctl (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Giacomo Catenazzi Status: Unconfirmed = Fix Released -- microcode.ctl.postinst needs updated MC_ID https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/92552 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
