[Bug 1162073] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1154529] Re: 8086:088e Wireless connection drops off randomly
The model is Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US. However, I should add that this problem has disappeared after I have moved to a place with smaller number of WiFi connections nearby. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: 8086:088e Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1161699] Re: [Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US] lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801
They have only Windows executable tool for BIOS update, so I have to install Windows to test it. However, I have updated my BIOS around March or April (don't remember exactly) and since the version of the update tool is from 13th of April, I doubt that there is a newer BIOS version. However, if I get some free time I will install Windows to check if there is a new BIOS version. The output of the terminal command is: $ sudo dmidecode -s bios-version sudo dmidecode -s bios-release-date P04AAC 08/08/2012 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161699 Title: [Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US] lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1161699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1161699] Re: lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801
The model is Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161699 Title: lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1161699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094534] Re: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log
Confirming that the solution from #14 worked for me as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094534 Title: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1094534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 14/04/13 16:58, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 12-04-13 14:38:00, Ivan Danov wrote: On 12/04/13 13:11, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 12-04-13 12:49:30, Ivan Danov wrote: $ cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness 60 OK, thanks for confirming this. It is really strange that we do not swap almost at all, then. I have increased my swap partition from nearly 2GB to around 16GB, but the problem remains. Increasing the swap partition will not help much as it almost unused with 2G already (at least last data shown that). Here I attach the logs for the larger swap partition. I use a MATLAB script to simulate the problem, but it also works in Octave: X = ones(10,1); AFAIU this will create a matrix with 10^9 elements and initialize them to 1. I am not familiar with octave but do you happen to know what is the data type used for the element? 8B? It would be also interesting to know how is the matrix organized and initialized. Does it fit into memory at all? Yes, 8B each, so it will be almost 8GB and it should fit into the memory. It won't fit in because kernel and other processes consume some memory as well. So you have to swap. I don't know details how it actually works, but if it cannot create the matrix, MATLAB complains about that. Since it starts complaining even after 2000 more in the second dimension, maybe it needs the RAM to create it all. However on the desktop machine, both RAM and swap are being used (quite a lot of them both). How much you swap depends on vm.swappiness. I would suggest increasing the value if your workload is really so anononymous memory based. Otherwise a lot of file pages are reclaimed which can lead to problems you are seeing. I have tried to simulate the problem on a desktop installation with 4GB of RAM, 10GB of swap partition, installed Ubuntu Lucid and then upgraded to 12.04, the problem isn't there, but the input is still quite choppy during the load. After the script finishes, everything looks fine. For the desktop installation the hard drive is not an SSD hard drive. What is the kernel version used here? $ uname -a Linux ivan 3.2.0-40-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 25 21:22:10 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Is there any chance you could test with the latest vanilla kernel and Mel's patches from https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/4/11/516 on top? Sorry for the late comeback, I've been quite busy these days. I will try to compile the kernel in the weekend. However, I will do kernel compiling for first time, so maybe it could take me some time. Btw I have upgraded to Ubuntu 13.04, so my kernel now is: $ uname -a Linux ivan 3.8.0-19-generic #30-Ubuntu SMP Wed May 1 16:35:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux The problem is still there. [...] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRkldrAAoJEJ8e6XRVH9TGgAIIAI7hw+YWhtiZ3LAr4SOQRvce xkRcSFUjmhW3FCSm5TERtUY6Ney3hJ9NU7I4yA56WGwOf2E6GnNkG0plewNMsWrM 4ZCFevsm1MoGP5576PUm8F0FF/0EfpFRLLwNNB7dDYDsXdmG8KlOYjlEB5H31lrR Ycx155ZvUgVUQXNg0tthaPoy8Qaw5sGI062d9tRA4f45fh7KFhX58HVHKT+L6LtV caLXwdH5Wkzi+Xshl6h8BGnB57fjQCDCEdltR3f1ddbUnh5kjvXKLGUWvuut7Ish vkbOTfSBbjOPtQly6DJ/xxS8HbSIsdDU4ecfWHGztl6r1lteFJDiqFA+bPsBszU= =oULy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
$ cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
60
I have increased my swap partition from nearly 2GB to around 16GB, but
the problem remains. Here I attach the logs for the larger swap
partition. I use a MATLAB script to simulate the problem, but it also
works in Octave:
X = ones(10,1);
I have tried to simulate the problem on a desktop installation with 4GB
of RAM, 10GB of swap partition, installed Ubuntu Lucid and then upgraded
to 12.04, the problem isn't there, but the input is still quite choppy
during the load. After the script finishes, everything looks fine. For
the desktop installation the hard drive is not an SSD hard drive.
On 12/04/13 12:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
[CCing Mel and Johannes]
On Fri 05-04-13 22:41:37, Ivan Danov wrote:
Here you can find attached the script, collecting the logs and the
logs themselves during the described process of freezing. It
appeared that the previous logs are corrupted, because both
/proc/vmstat and /proc/meminfo have been logging to the same file.
Sorry for the late reply:
$ grep MemFree: meminfo.1365194* | awk 'BEGIN{min=999}{val=$2;
if(valmin)min=val; if(valmax)max=val; sum+=val; n++}END{printf min:%d
max:%d avg:%.2f\n, min, max, sum/n}'
min:165256 max:3254516 avg:1642475.35
So the free memory dropped down to 165M at minimum. This doesn't sound
terribly low and the average free memory was even above 1.5G. But maybe
the memory consumption peak was very short between 2 measured moments.
The peak seems to be around this time:
meminfo.1365194083:MemFree: 650792 kB
meminfo.1365194085:MemFree: 664920 kB
meminfo.1365194087:MemFree: 165256 kB
meminfo.1365194089:MemFree: 822968 kB
meminfo.1365194094:MemFree: 666940 kB
Let's have a look at the memory reclaim activity
vmstat.1365194085:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 760
vmstat.1365194085:pgscan_kswapd_normal 10444
vmstat.1365194087:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 760
vmstat.1365194087:pgscan_kswapd_normal 10444
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 5855
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_kswapd_normal 80621
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 54333
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_kswapd_normal 285562
[...]
vmstat.1365194098:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 54333
vmstat.1365194098:pgscan_kswapd_normal 285562
vmstat.1365194100:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 55760
vmstat.1365194100:pgscan_kswapd_normal 289493
vmstat.1365194102:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 55760
vmstat.1365194102:pgscan_kswapd_normal 289493
So the background reclaim was active only twice for a short amount of
time:
- 1365194087 - 1365194094 - 53573 pages in dma32 and 275118 in normal zone
- 1365194098 - 1365194100 - 1427 pages in dma32 and 3931 in normal zone
The second one looks sane so we can ignore it for now but the first one
scanned 1074M in normal zone and 209M in the dma32 zone. Either kswapd
had hard time to find something to reclaim or it couldn't cope with the
ongoing memory pressure.
vmstat.1365194087:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 373
vmstat.1365194087:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 9057
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 3249
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 56756
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 14731
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 221733
...087-...089
- dma32 scanned 5095, reclaimed 0
- normal scanned 70177, reclaimed 0
...089-...094
-dma32 scanned 48478, reclaimed 2876
- normal scanned 204941, reclaimed 164977
This shows that kswapd was not able to reclaim any page at first and
then it reclaimed a lot (644M in 5s) but still very ineffectively (5% in
dma32 and 80% for normal) although normal zone seems to be doing much
better.
The direct reclaim was active during that time as well:
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_direct_dma32 0
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_direct_normal 0
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_direct_dma32 29339
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_direct_normal 86869
which scanned 29339 in dma32 and 86869 in normal zone while it reclaimed:
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_direct_dma32 0
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_direct_normal 0
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_direct_dma32 6137
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_direct_normal 57677
225M in the normal zone but it was still not effective very much (~20%
for dma32 and 66% for normal).
vmstat.1365194087:nr_written 9013
vmstat.1365194089:nr_written 9013
vmstat.1365194094:nr_written 15387
Only around 24M have been written out during the massive scanning.
So we have two problems here I guess. First is that there is not much
reclaimable memory when the peak consumption starts and then we have
hard times to balance dma32 zone.
vmstat.1365194087:nr_shmem 103548
vmstat.1365194089:nr_shmem 102227
vmstat.1365194094:nr_shmem 100679
This tells us that you didn't have that many shmem pages allocated at
the time (only 404M). So the /tmp backed by tmpfs shouldn't be the
primary issue here.
We still have a lot of anonymous memory though:
vmstat.1365194087:nr_anon_pages 1430922
vmstat.1365194089:nr_anon_pages 1317009
vmstat
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
On 12/04/13 13:11, Michal Hocko wrote:
On Fri 12-04-13 12:49:30, Ivan Danov wrote:
$ cat /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
60
OK, thanks for confirming this. It is really strange that we do not swap
almost at all, then.
I have increased my swap partition from nearly 2GB to around 16GB,
but the problem remains.
Increasing the swap partition will not help much as it almost unused
with 2G already (at least last data shown that).
Here I attach the logs for the larger swap partition. I use a MATLAB
script to simulate the problem, but it also works in Octave:
X = ones(10,1);
AFAIU this will create a matrix with 10^9 elements and initialize them
to 1. I am not familiar with octave but do you happen to know what is
the data type used for the element? 8B? It would be also interesting to
know how is the matrix organized and initialized. Does it fit into
memory at all?
Yes, 8B each, so it will be almost 8GB and it should fit into the
memory. I don't know details how it actually works, but if it cannot
create the matrix, MATLAB complains about that. Since it starts
complaining even after 2000 more in the second dimension, maybe it needs
the RAM to create it all. However on the desktop machine, both RAM and
swap are being used (quite a lot of them both).
I have tried to simulate the problem on a desktop installation with
4GB of RAM, 10GB of swap partition, installed Ubuntu Lucid and then
upgraded to 12.04, the problem isn't there, but the input is still
quite choppy during the load. After the script finishes, everything
looks fine. For the desktop installation the hard drive is not an
SSD hard drive.
What is the kernel version used here?
$ uname -a
Linux ivan 3.2.0-40-generic #64-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 25 21:22:10 UTC 2013
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On 12/04/13 12:20, Michal Hocko wrote:
[CCing Mel and Johannes]
On Fri 05-04-13 22:41:37, Ivan Danov wrote:
Here you can find attached the script, collecting the logs and the
logs themselves during the described process of freezing. It
appeared that the previous logs are corrupted, because both
/proc/vmstat and /proc/meminfo have been logging to the same file.
Sorry for the late reply:
$ grep MemFree: meminfo.1365194* | awk 'BEGIN{min=999}{val=$2;
if(valmin)min=val; if(valmax)max=val; sum+=val; n++}END{printf min:%d
max:%d avg:%.2f\n, min, max, sum/n}'
min:165256 max:3254516 avg:1642475.35
So the free memory dropped down to 165M at minimum. This doesn't sound
terribly low and the average free memory was even above 1.5G. But maybe
the memory consumption peak was very short between 2 measured moments.
The peak seems to be around this time:
meminfo.1365194083:MemFree: 650792 kB
meminfo.1365194085:MemFree: 664920 kB
meminfo.1365194087:MemFree: 165256 kB
meminfo.1365194089:MemFree: 822968 kB
meminfo.1365194094:MemFree: 666940 kB
Let's have a look at the memory reclaim activity
vmstat.1365194085:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 760
vmstat.1365194085:pgscan_kswapd_normal 10444
vmstat.1365194087:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 760
vmstat.1365194087:pgscan_kswapd_normal 10444
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 5855
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_kswapd_normal 80621
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 54333
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_kswapd_normal 285562
[...]
vmstat.1365194098:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 54333
vmstat.1365194098:pgscan_kswapd_normal 285562
vmstat.1365194100:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 55760
vmstat.1365194100:pgscan_kswapd_normal 289493
vmstat.1365194102:pgscan_kswapd_dma32 55760
vmstat.1365194102:pgscan_kswapd_normal 289493
So the background reclaim was active only twice for a short amount of
time:
- 1365194087 - 1365194094 - 53573 pages in dma32 and 275118 in normal zone
- 1365194098 - 1365194100 - 1427 pages in dma32 and 3931 in normal zone
The second one looks sane so we can ignore it for now but the first one
scanned 1074M in normal zone and 209M in the dma32 zone. Either kswapd
had hard time to find something to reclaim or it couldn't cope with the
ongoing memory pressure.
vmstat.1365194087:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 373
vmstat.1365194087:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 9057
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 3249
vmstat.1365194089:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 56756
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_kswapd_dma32 14731
vmstat.1365194094:pgsteal_kswapd_normal 221733
...087-...089
- dma32 scanned 5095, reclaimed 0
- normal scanned 70177, reclaimed 0
...089-...094
-dma32 scanned 48478, reclaimed 2876
- normal scanned 204941, reclaimed 164977
This shows that kswapd was not able to reclaim any page at first and
then it reclaimed a lot (644M in 5s) but still very ineffectively (5% in
dma32 and 80% for normal) although normal zone seems to be doing much
better.
The direct reclaim was active during that time as well:
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_direct_dma32 0
vmstat.1365194089:pgscan_direct_normal 0
vmstat.1365194094:pgscan_direct_dma32 29339
vmstat
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
Tested with ubuntu-10.04.4 on a desktop machine with 4GB of RAM and 10GB of swap. The problem remains, but needed higher demand to simulate and the input is less choppy, making it easier to use the UI. This leads me to the conlcusion that the problem happens when the whole virtual memory is full, i.e. both RAM and Swap memory. I would expect a behaviour that keeps reserved some of the RAM for sustaining the basic OS operations. However, I will try to increase the Swap and see if the problem is not so severe. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
Can I use virtual machine for testing it or it should be a completely new installation on the same hardware? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
Tried with vm.swappiness=60, but the only improvement is that now the mouse input is less choppy than before, but still the problem remains - the computer is not usable at all, one could not even stop the program, causing the problem. Best, Ivan -- On 04/04/13 17:16, Michal Hocko wrote: On Thu 04-04-13 16:10:06, Ivan Danov wrote: Hi Michal, Yes, I use swap partition (2GB), but I have applied some things for keeping the life of the SSD hard drive longer. All the things I have done are under point 3. at http://www.rileybrandt.com/2012/11/18/linux-ultrabook/. OK, I guess I know what's going on here. So you did set vm.swappiness=0 which (for some time) means that there is almost no swapping going on (although you have plenty of swap as you are mentioning above). This shouldn't be a big deal normally but you are also backing your /tmp on tmpfs which is in-memory filesystem. This means that if you are writing to /tmp a lot then this content will fill up your memory which is not swapped out until the memory reclaim is getting into real troubles - most of the page cache is dropped by that time so your system starts trashing. I would encourage you to set swappiness to a more reasonable value (I would use the default value which is 60). I understand that you are concerned about your SSD lifetime but your user experience sounds like a bigger priority ;) By system freezes, I mean that the desktop environment doesn't react on my input. Just sometimes the mouse is reacting very very choppy and slowly, but most of the times it is not reacting at all. In the attached file, I have the output of the script and the content of dmesg for all levels from warn to emerg, as well as my kernel config. I haven't checked your attached data but you should get an overview from Shmem line from /proc/meminfo which tells you how much shmem/tmpfs memory you are using and grep ^Swap /proc/meminfo will tell you more about your swap usage. Best, Ivan HTH -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
Here you can find attached the script, collecting the logs and the logs themselves during the described process of freezing. It appeared that the previous logs are corrupted, because both /proc/vmstat and /proc/meminfo have been logging to the same file. -- On 05/04/13 13:59, Michal Hocko wrote: On Fri 05-04-13 12:13:11, Ivan Danov wrote: Tried with vm.swappiness=60, but the only improvement is that now the mouse input is less choppy than before, but still the problem remains - the computer is not usable at all, one could not even stop the program, causing the problem. OK, could you collect /proc/vmstat and /proc/meminfo during that load? Best, Ivan -- On 04/04/13 17:16, Michal Hocko wrote: On Thu 04-04-13 16:10:06, Ivan Danov wrote: Hi Michal, Yes, I use swap partition (2GB), but I have applied some things for keeping the life of the SSD hard drive longer. All the things I have done are under point 3. at http://www.rileybrandt.com/2012/11/18/linux-ultrabook/. OK, I guess I know what's going on here. So you did set vm.swappiness=0 which (for some time) means that there is almost no swapping going on (although you have plenty of swap as you are mentioning above). This shouldn't be a big deal normally but you are also backing your /tmp on tmpfs which is in-memory filesystem. This means that if you are writing to /tmp a lot then this content will fill up your memory which is not swapped out until the memory reclaim is getting into real troubles - most of the page cache is dropped by that time so your system starts trashing. I would encourage you to set swappiness to a more reasonable value (I would use the default value which is 60). I understand that you are concerned about your SSD lifetime but your user experience sounds like a bigger priority ;) By system freezes, I mean that the desktop environment doesn't react on my input. Just sometimes the mouse is reacting very very choppy and slowly, but most of the times it is not reacting at all. In the attached file, I have the output of the script and the content of dmesg for all levels from warn to emerg, as well as my kernel config. I haven't checked your attached data but you should get an overview from Shmem line from /proc/meminfo which tells you how much shmem/tmpfs memory you are using and grep ^Swap /proc/meminfo will tell you more about your swap usage. Best, Ivan HTH ** Attachment added: bug-with-swappiness.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073/+attachment/3624404/+files/bug-with-swappiness.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
Hi Michal, Yes, I use swap partition (2GB), but I have applied some things for keeping the life of the SSD hard drive longer. All the things I have done are under point 3. at http://www.rileybrandt.com/2012/11/18/linux-ultrabook/. By system freezes, I mean that the desktop environment doesn't react on my input. Just sometimes the mouse is reacting very very choppy and slowly, but most of the times it is not reacting at all. In the attached file, I have the output of the script and the content of dmesg for all levels from warn to emerg, as well as my kernel config. Best, Ivan -- On 04/04/13 09:08, Michal Hocko wrote: On Thu 04-04-13 08:27:18, Simon Jeons wrote: On 04/03/2013 08:12 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: On Mon 01-04-13 21:14:40, Ivan Danov wrote: The system freezes when RAM gets completely full. By using MATLAB, I can get all 8GB RAM of my laptop full and it immediately freezes, needing restart using the hardware button. Do you use swap (file/partition)? How big? Could you collect /proc/meminfo and /proc/vmstat (every few seconds)[1]? What does it mean when you say the system freezes? No new processes can be started or desktop environment doesn't react on your input? Do you see anything in the kernel log? OOM killer e.g. In case no new processes could be started what does sysrq+m say when the system is frozen? What is your kernel config? Other people have reported the bug at since 2007. It seems that only the 64-bit version is affected and people have reported that enabling DMA in BIOS settings solve the problem. However, my laptop lacks such an option in the BIOS settings, so I am unable to test it. More information about the bug could be found at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/159356. Best Regards, Ivan --- [1] E.g. by while true do STAMP=`date +%s` cat /proc/meminfo meminfo.$STAMP cat /proc/vmscan meminfo.$STAMP s/vmscan/vmstat Right. Sorry about the typo and thanks for pointing out Simon. sleep 2s done ** Attachment added: bug.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073/+attachment/3620928/+files/bug.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] System freezes when RAM is full (64-bit)
The system freezes when RAM gets completely full. By using MATLAB, I can get all 8GB RAM of my laptop full and it immediately freezes, needing restart using the hardware button. Other people have reported the bug at since 2007. It seems that only the 64-bit version is affected and people have reported that enabling DMA in BIOS settings solve the problem. However, my laptop lacks such an option in the BIOS settings, so I am unable to test it. More information about the bug could be found at: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/159356. Best Regards, Ivan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1161699] Re: lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801
I have tried with the upstream kernel and the result is still the same. Here is the output of calling sensors-detect: user@laptop:~$ sudo sensors-detect [sudo] password for user: # sensors-detect revision 5984 (2011-07-10 21:22:53 +0200) # System: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D (laptop) # Board: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions, unless you know what you're doing. Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors. Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no): Module cpuid loaded successfully. Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595... No VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors... No VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors...No AMD K8 thermal sensors... No AMD Family 10h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 11h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 15h thermal sensors... No AMD Family 15h power sensors... No Intel digital thermal sensor... Success! (driver `coretemp') Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor... No VIA C7 thermal sensor...No VIA Nano thermal sensor... No Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe. Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no): Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No Trying family `SMSC'... No Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'... No Trying family `ITE'... No Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'... No Trying family `SMSC'... Yes Found unknown chip with ID 0x0b00 Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports. We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (YES/no): Probing for `National Semiconductor LM78' at 0x290... No Probing for `National Semiconductor LM79' at 0x290... No Probing for `Winbond W83781D' at 0x290... No Probing for `Winbond W83782D' at 0x290... No Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble on some systems. Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no): Found unknown SMBus adapter 8086:1e22 at :00:1f.3. Sorry, no supported PCI bus adapters found. Module i2c-dev loaded successfully. Next adapter: i915 gmbus ssc (i2c-0) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: i915 gmbus vga (i2c-1) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: i915 gmbus panel (i2c-2) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: i915 gmbus dpc (i2c-3) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: i915 gmbus dpb (i2c-4) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: i915 gmbus dpd (i2c-5) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Next adapter: DPDDC-B (i2c-6) Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively): Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done. Just press ENTER to continue: Driver `coretemp': * Chip `Intel digital thermal sensor' (confidence: 9) To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules: #cut here # Chip drivers coretemp #cut here If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones! Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO) Unloading i2c-dev... OK Unloading cpuid... OK ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1161699 Title: lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1161699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] [NEW] System freeze on high memory usage
Public bug reported: When I use MATLAB and all 8GB of RAM are full, system freezes and only a hard restart can get it working. I have found that the same bug is around since 2007 in the bug report at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/159356, but it was not fixed. Since Christopher M. Penalver insisted for re-reporting the bug and none have done it yet, I decided to report it. I have tested it with the newest kernel http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v3.9-rc4-raring/ and it still persists. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2469 F pulseaudio Date: Sat Mar 30 00:49:49 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4def1db0-01fa-4505-8eb6-97442bc58e4a InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (29 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D MarkForUpload: True ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic root=UUID=4936fe74-689d-4768-951a-d793b24ad3cc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A linux-firmware1.95 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/08/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: P04AAC dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: FAB1 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrP04AAC:bd08/08/2012:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pn900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D:pvr0.1:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnSAMSUNG_NP1234567890:rvrFAB1:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug kernel-bug-exists-upstream quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159356] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
I have experienced the same bug. I have re-reported the bug, as needed. The new bug report is at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159356 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/159356/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1162073] Re: System freeze on high memory usage
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1162073 Title: System freeze on high memory usage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1162073/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1161699] [NEW] lm-sensors does not detect fan sensors, provided by i2c_i801
Public bug reported: lm-sensors cannot detect my fan sensors, so my fan is not working at all and that makes my laptop have very high temperatures, which is very bad for it. I have tried several times to run sensors-detect, but only coretemp is detected, although for Ivy Bridge (Panther Point chipset), there should be more sensors provided by i2c_i801. While looking for a solution, I have found an ongoing discussion on http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-946718-start-0.html, where they have concluded that this is probably a kernel bug. I have created a bug report couple of days ago for lm-sensors, but they have it was marked as invalid. I create another one, since it is definitely a bug, a very problematic one, since my laptop has crashed already couple of times due to overheating. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2424 F pulseaudio Date: Fri Mar 29 02:53:26 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4def1db0-01fa-4505-8eb6-97442bc58e4a InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (28 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D MarkForUpload: True ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic root=UUID=4936fe74-689d-4768-951a-d793b24ad3cc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home directory /home/ivan not ours. No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-26-generic N/A linux-firmware1.95 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/08/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: P04AAC dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: FAB1 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrP04AAC:bd08/08/2012:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pn900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D:pvr0.1:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnSAMSUNG_NP1234567890:rvrFAB1:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal ** Description changed: lm-sensors cannot detect my fan sensors, so my fan is not working at all and that makes my laptop have very high temperatures, which is very bad for it. I have tried several times to run sensors-detect, but only - coretemp is detected. + coretemp is detected, where for Ivy Bridge (Panther Point chipset), + there should be more sensors provided by i2c_i801. While looking for a solution, I have found an ongoing discussion on http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-946718-start-0.html, where they have concluded that this is probably a kernel bug. I have created a bug report couple of days ago for lm-sensors, but they have it was marked as invalid. I create another one, since it is definitely a bug, a very problematic one, since my laptop has crashed already couple of times due to overheating. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-26-generic 3.5.0-26.42 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2424 F pulseaudio + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2424 F pulseaudio Date: Fri Mar 29 02:53:26 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4def1db0-01fa-4505-8eb6-97442bc58e4a InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (28 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D MarkForUpload: True ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-26-generic root=UUID=4936fe74-689d-4768-951a-d793b24ad3cc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: - Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home directory /home/ivan not ours. - No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. + Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: Home directory
[Bug 1154529] Re: Wireless connection drops off randomly
I have to add that I have noticed a pattern of that behaviour. It seems to appear only when the laptop is off the charger. So maybe it could be related to Ubuntu's power saving configuration (if there's any). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1160081] [NEW] Cooling fan is always turned off, causing overheating
Public bug reported: lm-sensors fails to detect a pwm sensors, when running sensors-detect. There is no way to turn on the fan and that often causes overheating, where computationally intensive tasks are to be run. Running: root@laptop:/# sensors acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1:+80.0°C (crit = +106.0°C) temp2:+29.8°C (crit = +106.0°C) coretemp-isa- Adapter: ISA adapter Physical id 0: +81.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 0: +81.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 1: +79.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) root@laptop:/# pwmconfig /usr/sbin/pwmconfig: There are no pwm-capable sensor modules installed root@laptop:/# acpi -c Cooling 0: LCD 0 of 95 Cooling 1: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 2: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 3: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 4: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 5: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 6: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 7: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 8: Fan 0 of 1 Cooling 9: Fan 0 of 1 root@laptop:/# fancontrol Loading configuration from /etc/fancontrol ... Error: Can't read configuration file root@laptop:/# uname -a Linux laptop 3.5.0-26-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 8 23:18:20 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: lm-sensors 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 25 23:43:34 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (25 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: lm-sensors UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to lm-sensors in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160081 Title: Cooling fan is always turned off, causing overheating To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1160081/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 1160081] [NEW] Cooling fan is always turned off, causing overheating
Public bug reported: lm-sensors fails to detect a pwm sensors, when running sensors-detect. There is no way to turn on the fan and that often causes overheating, where computationally intensive tasks are to be run. Running: root@laptop:/# sensors acpitz-virtual-0 Adapter: Virtual device temp1:+80.0°C (crit = +106.0°C) temp2:+29.8°C (crit = +106.0°C) coretemp-isa- Adapter: ISA adapter Physical id 0: +81.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 0: +81.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) Core 1: +79.0°C (high = +87.0°C, crit = +105.0°C) root@laptop:/# pwmconfig /usr/sbin/pwmconfig: There are no pwm-capable sensor modules installed root@laptop:/# acpi -c Cooling 0: LCD 0 of 95 Cooling 1: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 2: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 3: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 4: Processor 0 of 10 Cooling 5: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 6: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 7: Fan 1 of 1 Cooling 8: Fan 0 of 1 Cooling 9: Fan 0 of 1 root@laptop:/# fancontrol Loading configuration from /etc/fancontrol ... Error: Can't read configuration file root@laptop:/# uname -a Linux laptop 3.5.0-26-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Mar 8 23:18:20 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: lm-sensors 1:3.3.1-2ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-26.42-generic 3.5.7.6 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-26-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Mar 25 23:43:34 2013 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (25 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MarkForUpload: True SourcePackage: lm-sensors UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: lm-sensors (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1160081 Title: Cooling fan is always turned off, causing overheating To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lm-sensors/+bug/1160081/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878052] Re: Content of hidden folders shown in unity-lens-files
Tested with the required version and it works, the bug is fixed. dpkg -l | grep unity-lens-files ii unity-lens-files 6.6.1-0ubuntu1 amd64File lens for unity ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878052 Title: Content of hidden folders shown in unity-lens-files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/878052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1154529] Re: Wireless connection drops off randomly
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1154529] Re: Wireless connection drops off randomly
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1154529] [NEW] Wireless connection drops off randomly
Public bug reported: Wi-Fi drops off frequently. It is easily fixable by turning off and turning it on again by the hardware switch (in my case the key combination Fn+F12), but it is very annoying. I have not found any pattern for the occurring. When the Wi-Fi drops, the indicator it still shows that it is connected to the router, but the Internet is gone as well as the connection to the router's ip. Running: sudo lspci -v -s 02:00.0 |egrep -v 'Serial Number' shows: 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet controller (rev 06) Subsystem: Samsung Electronics Co Ltd Device c0d3 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 46 I/O ports at 2000 [size=256] Memory at f0404000 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=4K] Memory at f040 (64-bit, prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [40] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [50] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [70] Express Endpoint, MSI 01 Capabilities: [b0] MSI-X: Enable- Count=4 Masked- Capabilities: [d0] Vital Product Data Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Capabilities: [140] Virtual Channel Kernel driver in use: r8169 Kernel modules: r8169 The bug looks similar to https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/945379, but since it is for different Ethernet controller, they could stem from different problem. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-25-generic 3.5.0-25.39 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39-generic 3.5.7.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2266 F pulseaudio /dev/snd/pcmC0D0p: ivan 2266 F...m pulseaudio Date: Wed Mar 13 11:07:28 2013 EcryptfsInUse: Yes HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4def1db0-01fa-4505-8eb6-97442bc58e4a InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (12 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D MarkForUpload: True ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-25-generic root=UUID=4936fe74-689d-4768-951a-d793b24ad3cc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-25-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-25-generic N/A linux-firmware1.95 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/08/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: P04AAC dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: FAB1 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrP04AAC:bd08/08/2012:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pn900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D:pvr0.1:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnSAMSUNG_NP1234567890:rvrFAB1:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1154529] Re: Wireless connection drops off randomly
Since I am not sure which controller is responsible for the wifi, here is also the info for the network controller: sudo lspci -v -s 01:00.0 |egrep -v 'Serial Number' 01:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6235 (rev 24) Subsystem: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6235 AGN Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 49 Memory at f060 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K] Capabilities: [c8] Power Management version 3 Capabilities: [d0] MSI: Enable+ Count=1/1 Maskable- 64bit+ Capabilities: [e0] Express Endpoint, MSI 00 Capabilities: [100] Advanced Error Reporting Kernel driver in use: iwlwifi Kernel modules: iwlwifi -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1154529 Title: Wireless connection drops off randomly To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1154529/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1150457] Re: Very slow restart/shutdown time at random (but very often)
I have tested it before with 3.8, now I have tested it with 3.9 as suggested in #3 - the problem still remains. The computer waited 20 seconds after the press of the restart button and only then the Ubuntu logo with the dots counting appeared. Until then, the system looked like no restart was invoked. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150457 Title: Very slow restart/shutdown time at random (but very often) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1150457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094534] Re: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log
I have tested it with the mainline kernel provided by #6, the problem still persist. However the addition from my comment in #7 about the misbehaviour after restart with more than one USB device attached, turned out to be false, probably caused by me being confused. The problem is apparent only after returning from suspend. I am using Ubuntu 12.10 64 bit with kernel version 3.5.0-25-generic. The log for dmesg | grep xhci in normal state is: [0.957071] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: xHCI Host Controller [0.957076] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2 [0.962406] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 16, io mem 0xf050 [0.962488] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 41 for MSI/MSI-X [0.962494] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 42 for MSI/MSI-X [0.962500] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 43 for MSI/MSI-X [0.962506] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 44 for MSI/MSI-X [0.962512] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: irq 45 for MSI/MSI-X [0.962639] usb usb2: Manufacturer: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic xhci_hcd [0.962710] xHCI xhci_add_endpoint called for root hub [0.962712] xHCI xhci_check_bandwidth called for root hub [0.962795] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: xHCI Host Controller [0.962799] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3 [0.965919] usb usb3: Manufacturer: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic xhci_hcd [0.965983] xHCI xhci_add_endpoint called for root hub [0.965985] xHCI xhci_check_bandwidth called for root hub [1.512127] usb 2-1: new full-speed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd [2.755406] usb 3-2: new SuperSpeed USB device number 2 using xhci_hcd [ 636.593490] usb 3-2: new SuperSpeed USB device number 3 using xhci_hcd Where after going back from suspend is: [ 695.184718] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 2 ep 19 with no TDs queued? [ 695.185086] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 2 ep 6 with no TDs queued? [ 695.185462] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 2 ep 0 with no TDs queued? [ 695.188239] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 4 with no TDs queued? [ 695.189247] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 2 with no TDs queued? [ 695.190219] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN Event TRB for slot 1 ep 0 with no TDs queued? [ 695.994486] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: WARN: xHC restore state timeout [ 695.994498] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: PCI post-resume error -110! [ 695.994500] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: HC died; cleaning up [ 695.994503] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: HC died; cleaning up [ 702.068320] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: Timeout while waiting for configure endpoint command [ 707.134334] xhci_hcd :03:00.0: Timeout while waiting for configure endpoint command ** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094534 Title: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1094534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 986724] Re: Lid state changes not detected on Samsung NP900X3B
Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US, BIOS Version: P04AAC (the latest available from the official update software). Ubuntu 12.10, 64bit kernel version 3.5.0-25-generic, tested with the upstream 3.8...rc1. The laptop suspends on on lid close, but it does not resume on lid opening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/986724 Title: Lid state changes not detected on Samsung NP900X3B To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/986724/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1150457] [NEW] Very slow restart/shutdown time at random (but very often)
Public bug reported: When trying to restart, very often the time for shutting down the system goes beyond 10-15 seconds and more. I have tried to go to the menu and press restart again (some seconds after the first pressing), the system restarts immediately. That happens with no pattern occurring. The only reproducible case is only when I try restarting soon after booting (after all programs seem to be loaded), a window prompting for entering the login keyring password appears and the system does not restart until the password is entered. I have tried several times to reboot from terminal, but the problem did not appear. However, it might be because of the seemingly random nature of the event, since I could not find any pattern for its occurring. I have tried to restart after disabling networks couple of times and it restarted on time. However, it needs to be tested more. I have looked at this issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1061639 , but it does not provide any solution to my problem. I suspect it might be network-manager related because of the discussion there. I am using Samsung Series 9 NP900X4C-A04US, Ubuntu 12.10 amd64. I have tried the kernel 3.8-rc1 and the bug appears again. Therefore I have marked it as kernel-bug-exists-upstream. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10 Package: linux-image-3.5.0-25-generic 3.5.0-25.39 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39-generic 3.5.7.4 Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: ivan 2220 F pulseaudio Date: Wed Mar 6 21:59:05 2013 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=4def1db0-01fa-4505-8eb6-97442bc58e4a InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-02-28 (5 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Release amd64 (20121017.5) MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D MarkForUpload: True ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.5.0-25-generic root=UUID=4936fe74-689d-4768-951a-d793b24ad3cc ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon. RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.5.0-25-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.5.0-25-generic N/A linux-firmware1.95 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 08/08/2012 dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. dmi.bios.version: P04AAC dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag dmi.board.name: SAMSUNG_NP1234567890 dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.board.version: FAB1 dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag dmi.chassis.type: 9 dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. dmi.chassis.version: 0.1 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrP04AAC:bd08/08/2012:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pn900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D:pvr0.1:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnSAMSUNG_NP1234567890:rvrFAB1:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct9:cvr0.1: dmi.product.name: 900X3C/900X3D/900X4C/900X4D dmi.product.version: 0.1 dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug kernel-bug-exists-upstream network-manager quantal restart shutdown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1150457 Title: Very slow restart/shutdown time at random (but very often) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1150457/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1094534] Re: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log
This bug affects me as well. I am using Samsung 900X4C. I have to add that the USBs fail even after restart, if there are more than one USB device attached to the laptop. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094534 Title: USB 3.0 ports don't work after suspend, xhci_hcd errors in kernel log To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1094534/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 764352] Re: Unity search results depends on typing speed
** Also affects: unity-lens-applications Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764352 Title: Unity search results depends on typing speed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/764352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 764352] Re: Unity search results depends on typing speed
It happens in unity-lens-applications too. When I type fast terminal in the main search field (home dash) and press enter without waiting, sometimes LibreOffice is opened. Sometimes some gwibber links are opened too (since I have installed unity-lens-gwibber too). If I want to open the correct item, I have to wait sometimes up to 1-2 seconds and then press enter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/764352 Title: Unity search results depends on typing speed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/764352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 619811] Re: The LyX menu is not shown in Unity
Same with me. Ubuntu Oneiric Ocelot 11.10, still happens with Adobe Reader. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/619811 Title: The LyX menu is not shown in Unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dbusmenu/+bug/619811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 878052] Re: Content of hidden folders shown in unity-files-lens
** Also affects: unity-lens-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: unity-lens-files Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - Content of hidden folders shown in unity-files-lens + Content of hidden folders shown in unity-lens-files -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878052 Title: Content of hidden folders shown in unity-lens-files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/878052/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756280] Re: Files lense should ignore hidden files
@Simon Hirscher: I am using up-to-date Ubuntu 11.10 and still have the problem with the files located in the .-folders - they are still visible in the unity-files-lens. It is true that if the file is a hidden file - it does not show in the Files Folders in Ubuntu 11.10. But if the file is located in a hidden directory, either directly in it or in a subdirectory, it is still showing up in the Files Folders in the Dash. I don't think this is a normal behavior, since still the idea of the hidden directory is broken - it's not hidden anymore if it's showing in the Dash, no matter if it's hidden in Nautilus and the Terminal. Should I report it as another bug or is it better to reopen the current one? ** Summary changed: - Files lense should ignore hidden files + Files lense should ignore hidden files and folders ** Description changed: Install unity-place-files 0.5.46-0ubuntu5.1 from natty-proposed and restart your session 1. get sure you already opened a file starting with . 2. make a search in the file lense which should match this file and ensure it doesn't appear I hid a file and opened it. Then I checked to see if it appeared on the Files Place and saw it on the Recent list. The Downloads list ignores it as it should. - You hide files for a reason (to remove clutter ;P), this kills the - purpose. + You hide files for a reason (to remove clutter ;P), this kills the purpose. + --- + The same thing happens with files located in hidden directories. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756280 Title: Files lense should ignore hidden files and folders To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/756280/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756280] Re: Files lense should ignore hidden files
Reopen the bug!!! Files in .-folders are still visible and that makes doesn't make any sense at all. If .-folders are hidden, .-files are hidden too, why the files located in .-folders are still visible? ** Also affects: unity-lens-files (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756280 Title: Files lense should ignore hidden files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/756280/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
