[Bug 1397516] Re: evince only prints blank pages
Just for clarity, all my comments about not working examples are in reference to normal PDFs such as the kalendar pdf in the OP... The test.pdf I attached is the only working pdf I've found. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397516 Title: evince only prints blank pages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1397516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1397516] Re: evince only prints blank pages
This affects me as well with most PDFs, except for the test.pdf I just attached (that I created with print to file from gedit). If I print to file and choose PDF, the new document looks fine as well (but still won't print) If I print to file and choose PS, the new document is blank. There is a workaround that works for me: Select preview instead of print from the print dialog, from the print preview window, click the printer icon (though if you have multiple printers, that probably won't select the correct one). ** Attachment added: A working pdf https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1397516/+attachment/4271638/+files/test.pdf -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1397516 Title: evince only prints blank pages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1397516/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132415] Re: if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst
I do agree it should be one fi lower! I'm no programmer by far, but that is what I was trying to achieve! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132415 Title: if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/+bug/1132415/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132415] [NEW] if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst
Public bug reported:
When installing cacti on a system with lighttpd already installed
debian/cacti.postinst runs but fails to set up a symlink for the file
lighttpd.conf
An excerpt of the code I believe to be at fault is here:
# Only try to add a symlink on a fresh install to respect
# changes done by the administrator
if [ $2 = '' ]; then
for server in $webservers; do
if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
fi
invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available ] ; then
ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/cacti.conf
fi
fi
done
fi
I've included the part about apache to show where in regards to the full
statement that the web server is restarted.
I believe the correct behavior should be as follows:
if [ $2 = '' ]; then
for server in $webservers; do
if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
fi
elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf ] ; then
ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf
lighty-enable-mod cacti
fi
invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
fi
done
fi
My changes reflect the fact that:
- it needs to check if the file already exists rather than checking the
directory
- I've changed the file name to reflect what I believe to be an
appropriate interpretation of the naming convention for the debian take
on conf files for lighttpd which is nn-name where nn reflects the
priority number
- included a call to lighty-enable-mod to then enable the cacti conf
file (as we are installing cacti aren't we?)
- shifted the call to invoke a http reboot to after lighttpd statements
so that in both apache and lighttpd cases the daemon is restarted
There is also a problem with the lighttpd.conf file that is provided, it is as
so:
# Cacti Alias
alias.url += (
/cacti = usr/share/cacti/site,
)
it should be:
# Cacti Alias
alias.url += (
/cacti = /usr/share/cacti/site,
)
to reflect that it is relative to the root directory rather than
current.
** Affects: cacti (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: cacti.conf cacti.postinst lighttpd lighttpd.conf
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132415
Title:
if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/+bug/1132415/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132415] Re: if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst
** Description changed:
- When installing cacti on a system with lighttpd already installed
+ When installing cacti on a system with lighttpd already installed,
debian/cacti.postinst runs but fails to set up a symlink for the file
lighttpd.conf
An excerpt of the code I believe to be at fault is here:
# Only try to add a symlink on a fresh install to respect
# changes done by the administrator
if [ $2 = '' ]; then
- for server in $webservers; do
- if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
- if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
- ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf
/etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
- fi
- invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
- elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
- if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available ] ; then
- ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/cacti.conf
- fi
- fi
- done
+ for server in $webservers; do
+ if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
+ if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
+ ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf
/etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
+ fi
+ invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
+ elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
+ if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available ] ; then
+ ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/cacti.conf
+ fi
+ fi
+ done
fi
I've included the part about apache to show where in regards to the full
statement that the web server is restarted.
I believe the correct behavior should be as follows:
if [ $2 = '' ]; then
-for server in $webservers; do
-if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
-if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
-ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf
/etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
-fi
-elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
-if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf ] ; then
- ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf
- lighty-enable-mod cacti
-fi
-invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
-fi
-done
+ for server in $webservers; do
+ if [ -d /etc/${server}/conf.d ]; then
+ if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf ] ; then
+ ln -s ../../cacti/apache.conf
/etc/${server}/conf.d/cacti.conf
+ fi
+ elif [ -d /etc/${server}/conf-available ]; then
+ if [ ! -e /etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf ] ; then
+ ln -s ../../cacti/lighttpd.conf
/etc/${server}/conf-available/20-cacti.conf
+ lighty-enable-mod cacti
+ fi
+ invoke-rc.d $server reload || true
+ fi
+ done
fi
My changes reflect the fact that:
- it needs to check if the file already exists rather than checking the
directory
- I've changed the file name to reflect what I believe to be an
appropriate interpretation of the naming convention for the debian take
on conf files for lighttpd which is nn-name where nn reflects the
priority number
- included a call to lighty-enable-mod to then enable the cacti conf
file (as we are installing cacti aren't we?)
- shifted the call to invoke a http reboot to after lighttpd statements
so that in both apache and lighttpd cases the daemon is restarted
-
- There is also a problem with the lighttpd.conf file that is provided, it is
as so:
+ There is also a problem with the lighttpd.conf file that is provided, it
+ is as so:
# Cacti Alias
alias.url += (
- /cacti = usr/share/cacti/site,
+ /cacti = usr/share/cacti/site,
)
it should be:
# Cacti Alias
alias.url += (
- /cacti = /usr/share/cacti/site,
+ /cacti = /usr/share/cacti/site,
)
to reflect that it is relative to the root directory rather than
current.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132415
Title:
if statement for symlink of lighttpd.conf is wrong in cacti.postinst
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cacti/+bug/1132415/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 974480] Re: Notification area whitelist is obsolete
Wow, what a terribly short-sighted egotistical decision... So the POV is: only Ubuntu specific Linux software will be usable on Ubuntu going forward (even the whitelist approach while already stupid, and intentionally hidden to confuse non technical users into not using apps that don't write Ubuntu specific version, at least it was an option for those of us who use many non Ubuntu specific apps by choice and sometimes by mandate). Why break usability of existing software to remove a list in a hidden setting (because the code is still there indefinitely for Wine and Java apps) for _no_reason_at_all_ Great... Well, Cinnamon is getting better every day... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974480 Title: Notification area whitelist is obsolete To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/974480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 871553] Re: Oneiric Lubuntu xfce4-power-manager displays a broken icon in lxpanel
This one effects me too, it only shows the broken icon when I plug in my power adapter though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/871553 Title: Oneiric Lubuntu xfce4-power-manager displays a broken icon in lxpanel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-power-manager/+bug/871553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 667092] Re: [Ati 9600] Upper and side panels are invisible (i.e. 100% transparent)
Same problem here. lspci output is: 00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IGP2 (rev c1) 00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev c1) 00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev c1) 00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev c1) 00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev c1) 00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5 (rev c1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4) 00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) 00:04.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Ethernet Controller (rev a1) 00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce Audio Processing Unit (rev a2) 00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AC97 Audio Controler (MCP) (rev a1) 00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev a3) 00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2) 00:0d.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): nVidia Corporation nForce2 FireWire (IEEE 1394) Controller (rev a3) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1) 01:0b.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3112 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 02) 02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R350 [Radeon 9800 Pro] 02:00.1 Display controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R350 [Radeon 9800 Pro] (Secondary) -- [Ati 9600] Upper and side panels are invisible (i.e. 100% transparent) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667092 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 385633] Re: [karmic] display doesn't go to DPMS sleep
Does anyone know if the problems talked about here: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/08/14/blanking-in-gnome-power- manager-fixed/ and remedied here: http://blogs.gnome.org/hughsie/2009/08/17/gnome-power-manager-and- blanking-removal-of-bodges/ will bring a resolution to this issue? -- [karmic] display doesn't go to DPMS sleep https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138933] Re: [Gusty] Broken Nvidia driver after upgrade to Gusty (7.10)
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 106217 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106217 Just want to add to this: I triggered this bug by installing nvidia-glx-new, which didn't work for a specific card (too old), and then removing that and installing nvidia- glx. It looks like the hidden file /lib/linux-restricted- modules/.nvidia* caused the old 7XXX series kernel driver to be used instead of the 9XXX series after nvidia-glx-new was removed. The fix is to just make the removal scripts for nvidia-glx-new make sure to remove the hidden file @ /lib/linux-restricted-modules/.nvidia* -- [Gusty] Broken Nvidia driver after upgrade to Gusty (7.10) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138933 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83154] Re: ms-tnef attachment not readable
No problem, here ya go. ** Attachment added: Evolution tnef/winmail.dat plugin for Evolution 2.12 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10183279/evolution-tnef_0.0.0-2.12-1.deb -- ms-tnef attachment not readable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83154] Re: ms-tnef attachment not readable
Tnef support doesn't appear to be in Gutsy, so I rebuilt the evolution- tnef package for Evolution 2.12 ** Attachment added: Tnef / Winmail.dat plugin for Evolution 2.12 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10069273/evolution-tnef_0.0.0-2.12_i386.deb -- ms-tnef attachment not readable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108328] Re: Gparted does not see /home mountpoint for mounted drive
Here is a screenshot of Gparted and /etc/fstab ** Attachment added: gparted-bug.png http://librarian.launchpad.net/7376336/gparted-bug.png -- Gparted does not see /home mountpoint for mounted drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 108328] Gparted does not see /home mountpoint for mounted drive
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gparted If I open up gparted on my running system if does not see /dev/sda2 mounted to /home. Here's is the output of df -h: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 56G 12G 45G 21% / varrun 1014M 152K 1013M 1% /var/run varlock 1014M 4.0K 1014M 1% /var/lock procbususb 1014M 124K 1013M 1% /proc/bus/usb udev 1014M 124K 1013M 1% /dev devshm 1014M 0 1014M 0% /dev/shm lrm 1014M 33M 981M 4% /lib/modules/2.6.20-15-generic/volatile /dev/mapper/sda2 55G 18G 38G 32% /home ** Affects: gparted (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Gparted does not see /home mountpoint for mounted drive https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108328 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83154] Re: ms-tnef attachment not readable
NP, but I just packaged it, the real work was done by Michael Zucchi. It'll have to be recompiled for subsequent versions of Evolution. I would love to see this plugin get into Ubuntu proper or at least multiverse. -- ms-tnef attachment not readable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/83154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 84790] Re: [feisty] update-alternatives doesn't notice java6
What seems to happen is that update-alternatives correctly sets java6 as the default, however the symlink of /usr/bin/java is linked to /etc/alternatives/java which is only handled by update-java-alternatives not the usual update-alternatives. Is there anyway to make that a bit less confusing or has update-java- alternatives always been the proper way to handle the symlinks for java in /etc/alternatives? -- [feisty] update-alternatives doesn't notice java6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/84790 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 83154] Re: ms-tnef attachment not readable
I got winmail.dat integration working by following the instructions here: http://www.go-evolution.org/Tnef Had to fiddle with the configure file a little, but got it working. Install the evolution-dev package, libytnef0, and libytnef-dev and then compile. I'm attaching a deb built against Evolution 2.10 in feisty. Anyone think we can get this included at least in evolution-plugins- experimental? This is a dire feature for those using Evolution at work and having to deal with people using Outlook. ** Attachment added: Tnef plugin for Evolution 2.10 http://librarian.launchpad.net/6899789/evolution-tnef_0.0.0-1_i386.deb -- ms-tnef attachment not readable https://launchpad.net/bugs/83154 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 94976] pam_tally.so segfaults on edgy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: libpam-modules The version of libpam-modules on Edgy is 0.79-3 which contains a broken pam_tally.so module (it segfaults on successful password). 0.79-4 (which is in Feisty) fixes the issue. You can find a reference to the bug here, as well as a fix: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347338 Can we get Edgy's (and Dapper's?) libpam-modules updated to fix this? ** Affects: pam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed ** Description changed: Binary package hint: libpam-modules - The version of libpam-modules on Edgy is 0.79-3 which contains a broken pam_tally.so modules (it segfaults on successful password). + The version of libpam-modules on Edgy is 0.79-3 which contains a broken pam_tally.so module (it segfaults on successful password). 0.79-4 (which is in Feisty) fixes the issue. - You can find a reference to the bug here, as well as a patch for the fix: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347338 + You can find a reference to the bug here, as well as a fix: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=347338 Can we get Edgy's (and Dapper's?) libpam-modules updated to fix this? -- pam_tally.so segfaults on edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/94976 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 61539] Re: /etc/inittab (esp. ttys) not migrated to upstart jobs
On my system the /etc/default/console-setup file did not exist, the package console-setup which provides it was never required as dependency for me, so I just suddenly didn't have any more console, only X, which became a problem when I borked my nvidia drivers :-). This package should probably be included as a dependency somewhere. -- /etc/inittab (esp. ttys) not migrated to upstart jobs https://launchpad.net/bugs/61539 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
