[Bug 2057687] Re: systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid argument"

2024-05-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
@stevenrwalter
Can confirm that manually populating /sys/power/resume works as workaround for 
me too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057687

Title:
  systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid
  argument"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2057687/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2057687] Re: systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid argument"

2024-04-29 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Dmitry I have tried your workaround from #2, but step 8. (the second
hibernate) fails for me with a "Not enough swap space" error message.

On my setup I'm using a swapfile on a Btrfs formatted Logical Volume.
This worked fine in regards of hibernating on Kubuntu 23.10.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057687

Title:
  systemctl hibernate error: "Call to Hibernate failed: Invalid
  argument"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2057687/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061123] Re: Calamares fails to install on logical volume on several conditions when using Manual Partitioning

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
I updated the description due to the result of more testing which showed
that there seems to be a broader set of conditions where Calamares fails
to handle installation on a LV correctly (during Manual Partitioning).

I am attaching a second Calamares log, taken from an attempt to install on one 
of my LVs on real HW.
Note: It fails at a different point during installating compared to the VM test 
case – _not_ during copying files with rsync, but earlier at trying to format 
the LV kubuntu-test that I set as target for the root filesystem.

** Attachment added: "Calamares session.log of failed installation on real HW"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061123/+attachment/5766769/+files/session.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061123

Title:
  Calamares fails to install on logical volume on several conditions
  when using Manual Partitioning

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/2061123/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061123] Re: Calamares fails to install on logical volume if no partition/LV is marked for being formatted

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Description changed:

+ UPDATE:
+ Testing on my real HW revealed that there are more conditions when Calamares 
fails to install on a LV (when using Manual Partitioning).
+ 
+ Disk setup:
+ * 2 SSD (SSD A: M.2, SSD B: SATA)
+ * both with GPT partition table
+ * system uses UEFI boot
+ * SSD A contains:
+   - first ESP (EFI System partion) (used by main Kubuntu 23.10 system)
+   - PV Partition with volgroup internal-ssd1
+ - 1 LV roothome (primary root and home LV)
+ * SSD B contains:
+ - a second ESP (used only for testing purposes, distro installers can 
savely overwrite this)
+   - PV Partition with volgroup internal-ssd2
+ - 7 LVs (6 LVs for testing distros/Ubuntu versions, 1 LV temphome2 
(additional space for home and temporary stuff)
+ 
+ Installation to /dev/internal-ssd2/kubuntu-test (one of my test LVs, on SSD 
B) only works when:
+ * the second ESP (the one on SSD B) is selected as mount point for /boot/efi
+ * the second ESP is marked for being formatted
+ 
+ On all other conditions  I tested (second ESP _not_ being formatted,
+ first ESP being formatted, format kubuntu-test, keep data of kubuntu-
+ test), installation will fail because of volume groups being closed by
+ Calamares (same cause as described below for the VM test case).
+ 
+ What I did not test yet is replacing my main Kubuntu 23.10 and
+ using/formatting the first ESP.
+ 
+ END OF UPDATE
+ 
  SUMMARY
  
  On Kubuntu 24.04, Calamares fails to install if the following two
  conditions apply:
  
  * target / is on a Logical Volume (LVM)
  * no device is marked for being formatted
  
  STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
  1. Create a test VM set to UEFI mode (both Gnome Boxes and Virt Manager 
worked for me)
  2. Boot Kubuntu Noble daily image.
  
  #Preparing the disk
  3. sudo cfdisk /dev/vda
  4. Partition table: GPT
  5. New partition: 500M, Type: EFI System
  5. New partition: Rest of disk space, Type: Linux LVM
  6. Write partition table
  7. sudo mkfs.vfat -F 32 /dev/vda1 #format EFI partition
  8. sudo pvcreate /dev/vda2 #create physical volume
  9. sudo vgcreate kubuntu /dev/vda2 #create a volume group named 'kubuntu'
  10. sudo lvcreate -l 100%FREE -n kubuntutest kubuntu #create a logical volume 
named 'kubuntutest'
  11. sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/kubuntu/kubuntutest #format the LV
  12. Reboot (might not be necessary).
  
  #Installation
  13. Start installer
  14. Select 'Manual Partitioning'
  15. Set /dev/vda1 as /boot/efi, keep data
  16. Set kubuntu/kubuntutest as /, keep data
  17. Start installation.
  
  OBSERVED RESULT
  After short time, Calamares fails with Error dialog:
  * "Extraction of cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs failed"
  * "rsync failed with error code 11"
  
  EXPECTED RESULT
  Installation process runs through successfully.
  
  ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
  If in step 15 "Formatting" is selected instead of keeping data (while all 
other steps aren't changed), the installation will be successful. If instead 
the root filesystem in step 16 is set to being formatted, installation will 
also work. So it seems this bug occurs only if there is no partition/LV being 
specified for formatting.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
  Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
  Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
  .etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
-  ---
-  dontChroot: false
-  timeout: 120
-  firmwareType:
-  "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/kubuntu-calamares.desktop"
+  ---
+  dontChroot: false
+  timeout: 120
+  firmwareType:
+  "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/kubuntu-calamares.desktop"
  .etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
-  ---
-  restartNowMode: user-checked
-  restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
+  ---
+  restartNowMode: user-checked
+  restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
  .etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
-  crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
-  efiMountOptions: umask=0077
+  crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
+  efiMountOptions: umask=0077
  .etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
-  ---
-  dontChroot: true
-  timeout: 30
-  script:
-  - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
+  ---
+  dontChroot: true
+  timeout: 30
+  script:
+  - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
  .etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
-  ---
-  unpack:
-  -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
-  sourcefs: "squashfs"
-  destination: ""
+  ---
+  unpack:
+  -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
+  sourcefs: "squashfs"
+  destination: ""
  ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CasperVersion: 1.496
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Fri Apr 12 12:40:02 2024
  LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240412)
  RelatedPackageVersions:
-  calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.26
-  calamares-settings-lubuntu   N/A
-  xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
-  btrfs-progs   

[Bug 1930831] Re: Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-properties-kde

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
I can still reproduce with Kubuntu 24.04.

In Discover, if I click on the vertical-three-dots-icon in the upper
right -> "Configure updates..." and set the notification interval to
"weekly" in the Software Updates KCM, I still get update notifications >
1 times per day.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831

Title:
  Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-
  properties-kde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1930831/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930831] Re: Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-properties-kde

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected noble wayland-session

** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  Discover seems to check several times a day for updates in the
  background and then displays its notifier, even if I specified to check
  only every two days for updates in software-properties-kde (Muon ->
  Settings -> Configure Software Sources).
  
  It seems the update interval can't be configured directly in Discover,
  thus it would be logical to me if it would respect the settings
  configured in software-properties-kde instead.
  
  For me personally it is sometimes a bit annoying that avaiable updates
  are announced that often.
  
  This also affects plasma-discover-backend-flatpak, if installed.
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: plasma-discover 5.21.4-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19-generic 5.11.17
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Fri Jun  4 09:17:48 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-05 (59 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Beta amd64 (20210405)
  SourcePackage: plasma-discover
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ --- 
+ ProblemType: Bug
+ ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
+ Architecture: amd64
+ CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
+ CurrentDesktop: KDE
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
+ InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-04-14 (3 days ago)
+ InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240414)
+ Package: plasma-discover 5.27.11-0ubuntu2
+ PackageArchitecture: amd64
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
+ Tags: noble wayland-session
+ Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
+ UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
+ UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
+ _MarkForUpload: True

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831/+attachment/5766743/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831

Title:
  Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-
  properties-kde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1930831/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930831] ProcEnviron.txt

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831/+attachment/5766745/+files/ProcEnviron.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831

Title:
  Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-
  properties-kde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1930831/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930831] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2024-04-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831/+attachment/5766744/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831

Title:
  Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-
  properties-kde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1930831/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061123] Re: Calamares fails to install on logical volume if no partition/LV is marked for being formatted

2024-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
According to Calamares' session.log of the failed installation it seems
that Calamares deactivates/closes the volume group just before trying to
mount it as the install target - which thus can't work. There is already
an upstream bug report about that behaviour that I'll link here
(currently closed, yet there is recent activity of people still
experiencing this kind of problem).

** Bug watch added: Calamares Issues #1564
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1564

** Also affects: calamares via
   https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1564
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061123

Title:
  Calamares fails to install on logical volume if no partition/LV is
  marked for being formatted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/calamares/+bug/2061123/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2061123] [NEW] Calamares fails to install on logical volume if no partition/LV is marked for being formatted

2024-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

SUMMARY

On Kubuntu 24.04, Calamares fails to install if the following two
conditions apply:

* target / is on a Logical Volume (LVM)
* no device is marked for being formatted

STEPS TO REPRODUCE:
1. Create a test VM set to UEFI mode (both Gnome Boxes and Virt Manager worked 
for me)
2. Boot Kubuntu Noble daily image.

#Preparing the disk
3. sudo cfdisk /dev/vda
4. Partition table: GPT
5. New partition: 500M, Type: EFI System
5. New partition: Rest of disk space, Type: Linux LVM
6. Write partition table
7. sudo mkfs.vfat -F 32 /dev/vda1 #format EFI partition
8. sudo pvcreate /dev/vda2 #create physical volume
9. sudo vgcreate kubuntu /dev/vda2 #create a volume group named 'kubuntu'
10. sudo lvcreate -l 100%FREE -n kubuntutest kubuntu #create a logical volume 
named 'kubuntutest'
11. sudo mkfs.ext4 /dev/kubuntu/kubuntutest #format the LV
12. Reboot (might not be necessary).

#Installation
13. Start installer
14. Select 'Manual Partitioning'
15. Set /dev/vda1 as /boot/efi, keep data
16. Set kubuntu/kubuntutest as /, keep data
17. Start installation.

OBSERVED RESULT
After short time, Calamares fails with Error dialog:
* "Extraction of cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs failed"
* "rsync failed with error code 11"

EXPECTED RESULT
Installation process runs through successfully.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
If in step 15 "Formatting" is selected instead of keeping data (while all other 
steps aren't changed), the installation will be successful. If instead the root 
filesystem in step 16 is set to being formatted, installation will also work. 
So it seems this bug occurs only if there is no partition/LV being specified 
for formatting.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: calamares 3.3.5-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-22.22-generic 6.8.1
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-22-generic x86_64
.etc.calamares.modules.after_bootloader_context.conf:
 ---
 dontChroot: false
 timeout: 120
 firmwareType:
 "*": "-rm ${ROOT}/home/${USER}/Desktop/kubuntu-calamares.desktop"
.etc.calamares.modules.finished.conf:
 ---
 restartNowMode: user-checked
 restartNowCommand: "systemctl -i reboot"
.etc.calamares.modules.fstab.conf:
 crypttabOptions: luks,keyscript=/bin/cat
 efiMountOptions: umask=0077
.etc.calamares.modules.shellprocess_logs.conf:
 ---
 dontChroot: true
 timeout: 30
 script:
 - calamares-logs-helper ${ROOT}
.etc.calamares.modules.unpackfs.conf:
 ---
 unpack:
 -   source: "/cdrom/casper/filesystem.squashfs"
 sourcefs: "squashfs"
 destination: ""
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.496
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Fri Apr 12 12:40:02 2024
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Beta amd64 (20240412)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 calamares-settings-ubuntu-common 1:24.04.26
 calamares-settings-lubuntu   N/A
 xfsprogs 6.6.0-1ubuntu2
 btrfs-progs  6.6.3-1.1build2
SourcePackage: calamares
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: calamares (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061123

Title:
  Calamares fails to install on logical volume if no partition/LV is
  marked for being formatted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares/+bug/2061123/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953677] Re: Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

2024-02-27 Thread Jan Rathmann
Tested with Kubuntu 22.04.4 and 23.10 live images and can't reproduce it
anymore too – so I'll close this as Fixed.

** Changed in: breeze-icons (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953677

Title:
  Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breeze-icons/+bug/1953677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964401] Re: Software Sources/software-properties-qt privilege escalation not accepting password

2022-04-23 Thread Jan Rathmann
Can reproduce when booting kubuntu-22.04-desktop-amd64.iso in Virtualbox
and on my main installation of Kubuntu 22.04.

Happens both on X11 and Wayland session.

When I try to go to software-sources via Discover or Muon on the live
image (where no user password is set), it simply doesn't launch.

Terminal output of 'pkexec software-properties-qt':

qt.qpa.xcb: could not connect to display
qt.qpa.plugin: Could not load the Qt platform plugin "xcb" in "" even though it 
was found.
This application failed to start because no Qt platform plugin could be 
initialized. Reinstalling the application may fix this problem.

Available platform plugins are: eglfs, linuxfb, minimal, minimalegl,
offscreen, vnc, wayland-egl, wayland, wayland-xcomposite-egl, wayland-
xcomposite-glx, xcb.

Aborted (core dumped)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964401

Title:
  Software Sources/software-properties-qt privilege escalation not
  accepting password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1964401/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1964401] Re: Software Sources/software-properties-qt privilege escalation not accepting password

2022-04-23 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)

** Also affects: software-properties (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964401

Title:
  Software Sources/software-properties-qt privilege escalation not
  accepting password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1964401/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1741074] Re: [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host connector

2022-04-21 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Also affects: plasma-browser-integration (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1741074

Title:
  [snap] chrome-gnome-shell extension fails to detect native host
  connector

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1741074/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965329] Re: Crash on Kubuntu live image, impossible to install

2022-03-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
This happens both on a VirtualBox VM and my real hardware.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965329

Title:
  Crash on Kubuntu live image, impossible to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1965329/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965329] [NEW] Crash on Kubuntu live image, impossible to install

2022-03-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Ubiquity crashes on Kubuntu live image before the Welcome screen is
shown. I'm then taken to the Plasma Desktop sessions, but it crashes the
same way when I try to launch it via desktop icon. Thus installation is
impossible.

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 22.04.7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-22.22-generic 5.15.19
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu79
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.467
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Thu Mar 17 16:41:37 2022
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/kubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20220317)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy kubuntu ubiquity-22.04.7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965329

Title:
  Crash on Kubuntu live image, impossible to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1965329/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960683] Re: Garbled/overlapping text in Systemsettings -> Users

2022-02-11 Thread Jan Rathmann
Only the "Users" section seems to be affected, I clicked on all other
categories/subcategories and everything else looks ok.

** Attachment added: "Systemsettings with overlapping text in User section"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1960683/+attachment/5560450/+files/Bildschirmfoto_20220211_104151.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960683

Title:
  Garbled/overlapping text in Systemsettings -> Users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1960683/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960683] [NEW] Garbled/overlapping text in Systemsettings -> Users

2022-02-11 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

How to reproduce:

1. Boot Kubuntu Jammy daily-live image (VirtualBox is sufficient)
2. Start Systemsettings
3. Click on "Users"

The headline text looks "garbled", more than one copies of the same text
are overlapping each other (see screenshot).

This happens both on Jammy and Impish with Backports-PPA. It seems to be
independent of using X11 or Wayland.

I could _not_ reproduce this with Neon stable or unstable live image, so
it's possible that this is a specific problem of Kubuntu.

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: systemsettings 4:5.24.0-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-18.18-generic 5.15.12
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-18-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu76
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Fri Feb 11 21:40:54 2022
LiveMediaBuild: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20220210)
SourcePackage: systemsettings
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: systemsettings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960683

Title:
  Garbled/overlapping text in Systemsettings -> Users

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemsettings/+bug/1960683/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027]

2022-02-10 Thread Jan Rathmann
Vlad, thanks for the hint! The xdg-desktop-portal-gtk package was not
installed on my Jammy test system. After installing it, all three
remaing UI issues (wrong theme, wrong cursor, wrong font size) seem to
be fixed!

So it would help, at least on Kubuntu, if the xdg-desktop-portal-gtk
package was installed by default.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027]

2022-02-06 Thread Jan Rathmann
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #4)
> Does that happen with other GTK apps ran via snap? I don't think we have 
> control about the GTK theme in use.

Interesting, I tested two other GTK3 apps via snap (Inkscape and eog):
* when running under Plasma Wayland, they also used the "wrong" GTK theme 
(Adwaita instead of Breeze), just like Firefox. And they had the same ugly font 
rendering like in the GTK file dialog on my screenshot.
* on Plasma X11, all three apps (Inkscape, eog and Firefox) correctly used 
Breeze as GTK theme!

So it seems to me there is a general issue in Snap when running GTK3
apps under Plasma Wayland, which also affects Firefox.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027]

2022-02-06 Thread Jan Rathmann
(In reply to Emilio Cobos Álvarez (:emilio) from comment #2)
> Does this work on the nightly? I would expect bug 1734934 to have fixed this.

Two of the issues seem to be fixed in nightly:
1. Dark theme is now correctly enabled without requiring a session restart 
first.
5. Firefox correctly uses KDE file dialogs now (with correctly rendered fonts!)

The following three issues remain unchanged:
2. Font size of the UI elements is too big.
3. Wrong GTK theme is used (Adwaita, instead of Breeze Dark).
4. Mouse cursor uses wrong theme and is too big (it changes, when moving in and 
out of the Firefox window).

I installed nightly by running 'snap refresh --edge firefox'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027] Re: [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland session

2022-02-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1753732
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1753732

** Also affects: firefox via
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1753732
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1959027] Re: [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland session

2022-02-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
Am 04.02.22 um 12:51 schrieb Olivier Tilloy:
> Would you mind filing a bug at
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/enter_bug.cgi#h=dupes%7CFirefox with all
> this information? We're using the upstream bug tracker to manage firefox
> snap bugs. Thanks!
>

Ok, I can do that. Thanks for investigating!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  [snap] Various UI and theming issues when running in Plasma Wayland
  session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027] Re: Various UI and theming issues in Firefox snap when running in Plasma Wayland session

2022-01-25 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Second screenshot: GTK File dialog with distorted fonts"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1959027/+attachment/5557396/+files/Screenshot_20220125_165558.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  Various UI and theming issues in Firefox snap when running in Plasma
  Wayland session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959027] [NEW] Various UI and theming issues in Firefox snap when running in Plasma Wayland session

2022-01-25 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

after installing the current live image of Kubuntu Jammy, I tested the
preinstalled Firefox snap on the Plasma Wayland session (which I use by
default), and discovered multiple UI and theming issues:

1. I had switched my global theme to Breeze Dark. Nevertheless Firefox
used a light theme when I launched it for the first time. Interestingly,
at further runs Firefox properly came up with a dark theme. But I had
restarted my session in between and also had removed and reinstalled the
Firefox snap, so it's possible that one of these actions triggered
Firefox to finally use a dark theme.

2. The font size in the UI is too big (compare with other KDE apps on
screenshots).

3. It apparently doesn't use Breeze (light or dark) as the UI theme, but
something else (Adwaita I guess).

4. The mouse cursor uses the wrong theme and is too big (it changes
visible if move the cursor in and out of the Firefox window).

5. If I click e.g. on "File -> Open file...", the file dialog is not the
one from KDE but the one from GTK/Gnome. And the UI text is displayed in
a rather jagged/distorted way (see screenshot).

The issues described above do _not_ appear:
* If I run Firefox as snap in Plasma X11 session.
* If I run Firefox as deb (both Plasma Wayland and X11 session work fine).

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: firefox 96.0.2+build1-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-17.17-generic 5.15.12
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-17-generic x86_64
AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu75
Architecture: amd64
BuildID: 20220119190439
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Channel: Unavailable
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Jan 25 17:19:38 2022
DefaultProfileExtensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
DefaultProfileIncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
DefaultProfileLocales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
DefaultProfilePrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:365
DefaultProfileThemes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
ForcedLayersAccel: False
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-01-25 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 
(20220125.1)
IpRoute:
 default via 192.168.178.1 dev enp4s0 proto dhcp metric 100 
 169.254.0.0/16 dev enp4s0 scope link metric 1000 
 192.168.178.0/24 dev enp4s0 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.178.44 metric 
100
Profile0Extensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile0IncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
Profile0Locales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profile0PrefErrors: Unexpected character ',' before close parenthesis @ 
/usr/lib/firefox/omni.ja:greprefs.js:365
Profile0PrefSources: prefs.js
Profile0Themes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
Profiles:
 Profile1 (Default) - LastVersion=None/None (Out of date)
 Profile0 - LastVersion=96.0.2/20220119190439
RunningIncompatibleAddons: False
SourcePackage: firefox
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 06/18/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software International, Inc.
dmi.bios.version: F14
dmi.board.name: P35-DS3
dmi.board.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.board.version: x.x
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAwardSoftwareInternational,Inc.:bvrF14:bd06/18/2009:svnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:pnP35-DS3:pvr:rvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:rnP35-DS3:rvrx.x:cvnGigabyteTechnologyCo.,Ltd.:ct3:cvr:sku:
dmi.product.name: P35-DS3
dmi.sys.vendor: Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session

** Attachment added: "Wrong theme, UI font too big"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027/+attachment/5557383/+files/Screenshot_20220125_165617.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959027

Title:
  Various UI and theming issues in Firefox snap when running in Plasma
  Wayland session

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1959027/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953677] Re: Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

2021-12-08 Thread Jan Rathmann
I actually noticed this while investigating another bug in breeze-icon-
theme which leads to GTK apps showing icons from the bright default
Breeze icon theme instead of the dark one:

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445518

The linked report represents the state I get when using Kubuntu 21.10
with Backports-PPA enabled. Apparently, there is a patch in version
4:5.88.0-2ubuntu1 on 22.04 to solve KDE-445518, but this could possible
cause this new bug.

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #445518
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445518

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953677

Title:
  Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breeze-icons/+bug/1953677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953677] Re: Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

2021-12-08 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Wrong/weird folder icons with Breeze-dark"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breeze-icons/+bug/1953677/+attachment/5546336/+files/Bildschirmfoto_20211206_230430.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953677

Title:
  Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breeze-icons/+bug/1953677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1953677] [NEW] Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

2021-12-08 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

How to reproduce:

1. On a fresh install of Jammy in a VM (Virtualbox), set Global theme to 
Breeze-dark
2. Open Dolphin (symbol view)

Folder icons look weird/wrong (see screenshot. Possibly these are
upscaled versions of the small size folder icons inncorrectly getting
used?)

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: breeze-icon-theme 4:5.88.0-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu74
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Dec  6 12:36:06 2021
Dependencies: hicolor-icon-theme 0.17-2
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-05 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (20211205)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: breeze-icons
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: breeze-icons (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1953677

Title:
  Wrong folder icons when using dark theme

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breeze-icons/+bug/1953677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752]

2021-11-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
(In reply to Jan Rathmann from comment #15)
> For me this seems to be fixed under Kubuntu 21.10 with Gwenview 21.08.2 from
> kubuntu-backports-ppa.

Please disregard this comment - I totally forgot that I had installed a
patched version of exiv2 (with the change described in Comment 4) to
workaround the bug, sorry for causing confusion.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to gwenview in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1941752]

2021-11-11 Thread Jan Rathmann
For me this seems to be fixed under Kubuntu 21.10 with Gwenview 21.08.2
from kubuntu-backports-ppa.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752] Re: Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening images exported by darktable

2021-08-29 Thread Jan Rathmann
The following change in CVE-2021-37620-3.patch is responsible:

--- exiv2-0.27.3.orig/src/tags_int.cpp
+++ exiv2-0.27.3/src/tags_int.cpp
@@ -2865,7 +2865,7 @@ namespace Exiv2 {
 }
 
 std::string stringValue = value.toString();
-if (stringValue[19] == 'Z') {
+if (stringValue.at(19) == 'Z') {
 stringValue = stringValue.substr(0, 19);
 }
 for (size_t i = 0; i < stringValue.length(); ++i) {

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752] Re: Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening images exported by darktable

2021-08-27 Thread Jan Rathmann
Relevant terminal output from crash:

terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::out_of_range'
  what():  basic_string::at: __n (which is 19) >= this->size() (which is 19)
KCrash: crashing... crashRecursionCounter = 2
KCrash: Application Name = gwenview path = /usr/bin pid = 108229

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752] Re: Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening images exported by darktable

2021-08-27 Thread Jan Rathmann
CVE-2021-37620-3.patch is responsible.

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2021-37620

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752] Re: Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening images exported by darktable

2021-08-26 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Also affects: gwenview (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1941752] [NEW] Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening images exported by darktable

2021-08-26 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Since the recent security update of exiv2, Gwenview crashes when trying
to open image files that got exported by darktable.

Steps to reproduce:

* Make a test installation of Kubuntu 21.04 in VirtualBox
* Install all updates
* Install darktable
* Copy one of the images in /usr/share/wallpapers (or any other image) to your 
home directory and open it with darktable
* Within darktable, export a copy of the image (no need to do any actual 
modifications)
* Try to open that copy with Gwenview. Gwenview will crash.

I'm attaching a crash report hinting that this is related to exiv2.

Temporary workaround:
If I downgrade libexiv2-27 to 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.4, Gwenview doesn't crash, so it 
seems the crash is related to changes in 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5.

I don't know if the underlying cause is actually some bug in exiv2,
Gwenview or darktable.

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: libexiv2-27 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-31.33-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-31-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Thu Aug 26 15:16:47 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-08-26 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
SourcePackage: exiv2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gwenview
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: exiv2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute

** Attachment added: "Crash report of Gwenview"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752/+attachment/5520895/+files/gwenview-20210826-153914.kcrash

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #441121
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441121

** Also affects: gwenview via
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=441121
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941752

Title:
  Regression: exiv2 0.27.3-3ubuntu1.5 makes Gwenview crash when opening
  images exported by darktable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gwenview/+bug/1941752/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930831] [NEW] Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-properties-kde

2021-06-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

Discover seems to check several times a day for updates in the
background and then displays its notifier, even if I specified to check
only every two days for updates in software-properties-kde (Muon ->
Settings -> Configure Software Sources).

It seems the update interval can't be configured directly in Discover,
thus it would be logical to me if it would respect the settings
configured in software-properties-kde instead.

For me personally it is sometimes a bit annoying that avaiable updates
are announced that often.

This also affects plasma-discover-backend-flatpak, if installed.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: plasma-discover 5.21.4-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-18.19-generic 5.11.17
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-18-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Fri Jun  4 09:17:48 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-05 (59 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Beta amd64 (20210405)
SourcePackage: plasma-discover
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: plasma-discover (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930831

Title:
  Discover doesn't respect update interval settings in software-
  properties-kde

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-discover/+bug/1930831/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1906939] Re: kde frontend, ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sip'

2021-04-22 Thread Jan Rathmann
For me doing 'apt install python3-sip' solves this too, as darthkhamul
wrote in #4.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1906939

Title:
  kde frontend, ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'sip'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1906939/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923434] Re: Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
Dmitry, thanks for forwarding, I've subscribed to the upstream report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923434

Title:
  Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-
  3ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/+bug/1923434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923434] Re: Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Description changed:

  Since the update of qtwebengine-opensource-src to 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1
  my webcam is not detected anymore in Falkon.
  
  With 5.15.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1 this was working fine.
  
- Updating to 5.15.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1 didn't help.
+ Updating to 5.15.3+dfsg-5 didn't help.
  
  My cam is an older model:
  
  $lsusb
  Bus 001 Device 004: ID 046d:0928 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Express
  
  Note that it seems to be necessary for this webcam to be working to start the 
application that should use the cam with an LD_PRELOAD of v4l1compat.so, e.g.:
  LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libv4l/v4l1compat.so falkon
  
  But I'm not sure if this is related to this bug.
  
  I have attached the terminal output from starting Falkon and trying to
  access the webcam (by opening a random room at meet.jit.si)
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
  Package: libqt5webengine5 5.15.3+dfsg-5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-13.14-generic 5.11.7
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-13-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu62
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Mon Apr 12 12:03:54 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-05 (6 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Beta amd64 (20210405)
  SourcePackage: qtwebengine-opensource-src
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923434

Title:
  Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-
  3ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/+bug/1923434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923434] Re: Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
LD_PRELOAD was always necessary to make the cam work.
Yes, with 5.15.2 it worked (only) with LD_PRELOAD, with 5.15.3 even LD_PRELOAD 
doesn't help anymore (so currently I don't know any way how to make the cam be 
detected by Falkon).

Did a test with latest Google Chrome, seems to be the same as with
Falkon (cam is not detected even when using LD_PRELOAD). I never used
Google Chrome, so I unfortunately can't tell if it used to work on older
Chrome versions.

With Chromium I can't test because it's only avaiable as a Snap or
Flatpak where the LD_PRELOAD trick doesn't seem to be possible ( --> no
way to use the cam in a snapped or flatpaked app).

On Firefox the cam still works when launching with LD_PRELOAD.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923434

Title:
  Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-
  3ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/+bug/1923434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923434] [NEW] Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1

2021-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Since the update of qtwebengine-opensource-src to 5.15.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1
my webcam is not detected anymore in Falkon.

With 5.15.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1 this was working fine.

Updating to 5.15.2+dfsg-3ubuntu1 didn't help.

My cam is an older model:

$lsusb
Bus 001 Device 004: ID 046d:0928 Logitech, Inc. QuickCam Express

Note that it seems to be necessary for this webcam to be working to start the 
application that should use the cam with an LD_PRELOAD of v4l1compat.so, e.g.:
LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libv4l/v4l1compat.so falkon

But I'm not sure if this is related to this bug.

I have attached the terminal output from starting Falkon and trying to
access the webcam (by opening a random room at meet.jit.si)

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: libqt5webengine5 5.15.3+dfsg-5
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-13.14-generic 5.11.7
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu62
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Apr 12 12:03:54 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-04-05 (6 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Beta amd64 (20210405)
SourcePackage: qtwebengine-opensource-src
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: qtwebengine-opensource-src (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute

** Attachment added: "Terminal output of Falkon"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923434/+attachment/5486832/+files/falkon.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923434

Title:
  Regression: Falkon doesn't detect webcam anymore since 5.15.3+dfsg-
  3ubuntu1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtwebengine-opensource-src/+bug/1923434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1921003] Re: /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system

2021-03-31 Thread Jan Rathmann
Yes. Otherwise I run into bug #1893964 and the installation process is
aborted before the end.

Am 30.03.21 um 23:52 schrieb Brian Murray:
> When you reproduced it with the Ubuntu daily image were you also using
> the "-b" switch with ubiquity?
>
> ** Summary changed:
>
> - /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation medium 
> after installation on BIOS/legacy system
> + /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation medium 
> after installation on BIOS/legacy system with "ubiquity -b"
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921003

Title:
  /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation
  medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system with "ubiquity -b"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1921003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921003] Re: /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system

2021-03-30 Thread Jan Rathmann
Can also reproduce with current Ubuntu Hirsute daily image (beside
Kubuntu).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921003

Title:
  /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation
  medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1921003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 341024] Re: Use liberation fonts in firefox by default for better website layout

2021-03-24 Thread Jan Rathmann
Yes, this bug is fixed of course since years! Totally forgot about this
ancient report...

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341024

Title:
  Use liberation fonts in firefox by default for better website layout

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/341024/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921003] [NEW] /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system

2021-03-23 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

if I do a test installation of Kubuntu current daily image on my
machine, the installed system fails to boot because of a wrong entry in
/etc/fstab:

# /boot/efi was on /dev/sdd2 during installation
UUID=8066-B6E7  /boot/efi   vfatumask=0077  0   1 

The entry seems to point to the EFI partition of the installation medium
(which is removed/ejected after installation). Simply removing this
entry makes the new installed system boot up fine.

What seems interesting to me is that the machine I'm using and where I
did the testing doesn't support UEFI at all (BIOS only).

I started the installer with 'ubiquity -b' to avoid installing GRUB (I
prefer using GRUB from my main installation).

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04
Package: ubiquity (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-11.12-generic 5.11.0
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-11-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu60
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Tue Mar 23 20:57:54 2021
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/kubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-03-23 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Alpha amd64 (20210323)
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute ubiquity-21.04.11

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921003

Title:
  /etc/fstab has an invalid entry to EFI partition of installation
  medium after installation on BIOS/legacy system

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1921003/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems

2020-10-25 Thread Jan Rathmann
@nmaxx I think Brian's comment is not referring to the release notes but
to the warning during the installation process where the installer
complaints that installation will likely fail without an ESP.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI
  System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI
  systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems

2020-10-09 Thread Jan Rathmann
Sorry, typo in my last post, the command to install grub of course has
to be:

grub-install /dev/sda

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI
  System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI
  systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems

2020-10-09 Thread Jan Rathmann
Manual workaround for those who are affected:

1. Start Ubiquity by running 'ubiquity -b' (doesn't install grub and will not 
trigger this bug)
2. After installation is completed, don't reboot and install grub manually with 
the following commands in a terminal (assuming your have installed Ubuntu to 
/dev/sda1, change accordingly):

sudo mkdir uroot
sudo mount /dev/sda1 uroot
sudo mount -o bind /dev uroot/dev
sudo mount -o bind /sys uroot/sys
sudo mount -t proc /proc uroot/proc
sudo chroot uroot
grub-install /dev/sda1
update-grub
exit
sudo umount uroot/proc
sudo umount uroot/sys
sudo umount uroot/dev
sudo umount uroot

3. Then reboot, new installation should boot up fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI
  System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI
  systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems

2020-10-09 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  trying to install current daily-live images of Groovy in VirtualBox
- fails for me when I'm using manual partitioning.
+ fails for me when I'm using manual partitioning without an EFI System
+ Partition (ESP).
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  1. Partition layout I have used in VirtualBox:
-  * Partition table: MBR
-  * A single primary ext4 partition (/dev/sda1) using up the entire virtual 
harddisk with 1 MB free space before start of the partition
+  * Partition table: MBR
+  * A single primary ext4 partition (/dev/sda1) using up the entire virtual 
harddisk with 1 MB free space before start of the partition
  2. Boot current Groovy daily-live image, click on "Install Ubuntu"
  3. Choose "Something else" (manual partitioning)
  4. Select /dev/sda1 as target for '/', check "format partition".
  5. Ignore warning about missing EFI system partition.
  
  Result:
  
  The installation proceeds until GRUB is about to be installed.
  Then an error dialog appears: "Executing 'grub-install /dev/sda' failed. This 
is a fatal error." (screenshot attached).
  If I click 'Ok', after a moment Ubiquity nevertheless shows the usual dialog 
saying "Installation is complete. Please restart." The only option the dialog 
offered was to click on "Restart now".
- After that, booting the failed installation succeeds, but it is obvious that 
Ubiquity couldn't complete its job: Packages like ubiquity itself, which 
usually get purged from the fresh system at the end of a successful 
installation, are still installed. There is also a pop-up in gnome-shell 
showing an error regarding package management (screenshot attached, not sure if 
this is related to the failed install). 
+ After that, booting the failed installation succeeds, but it is obvious that 
Ubiquity couldn't complete its job: Packages like ubiquity itself, which 
usually get purged from the fresh system at the end of a successful 
installation, are still installed. There is also a pop-up in gnome-shell 
showing an error regarding package management (screenshot attached, not sure if 
this is related to the failed install).
+ 
+ Modifying the setup by creating an ESP manually like described in #7
+ makes the installation complete successfully without error.
+ 
+ The setups I have tested (my machine and VirtualBox) don't support UEFI
+ or don't have UEFI support enabled respectively (and thus don't actually
+ require an ESP to boot).
  
  To send this report, I was running 'sudo ubuntu-bug ubiquity' on the
  "failed", but nevertheless booting fresh installation.
  
  Kind regards, Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
  Package: ubiquity 20.10.9
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu45
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  Date: Wed Sep  2 16:55:14 2020
  InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-42-generic 
root=UUID=6ba06971-16c7-4df6-afcc-3bc101cba9a5 ro quiet splash
  SourcePackage: ubiquity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI
  System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI
  systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-10-09 Thread Jan Rathmann
Further testing, I found out that the grub installation failure seems to
be related to whether there is an EFI System Partition (ESP) or not.

I did the following change to my VirtualBox setup to manually create an ESP:
- Shrink the single partition on my virtual HD with GParted so I get 512MB free 
space at the end of the disk
- Create an additional primary FAT32 partition with 512MB size, mark it as ESP 
(with cfdisk)

So I have the following partition layout:
/dev/sda1: primary partion, size ~9,5GB, ext4
/dev/sda2: primary partition, size 512MB, fat32, marked as ESP

With this partition layout and selecting /dev/sda1 as root (marked for
formating) the installation will complete successfully without an error
regarding grub installation, and the installed system boots fine.

So it seems that this bug happens if there is no ESP on the system -
even if the system doesn't support UEFI at all and thus doesn't need an
ESP.

** Summary changed:

- Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install 
/dev/sda'
+ Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI System 
Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI systems

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning without an EFI
  System Partition fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda' even on non-UEFI
  systems

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-10-06 Thread Jan Rathmann
To be a bit more precise, I found out that this bug isn't limited to
VirtualBox, it also happens the same way when I try to install Groovy
directly on my hardware (older mainboard without UEFI, no ESP partition,
LVM setup, Btrfs filesystem on root).

** Summary changed:

- Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 
'grub-install /dev/sda'
+ Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install 
/dev/sda'

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-
  install /dev/sda'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1898334] [NEW] When starting Chromium, desktop-launch sometimes moves personal files and folders on separate partition to my home directoy

2020-10-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

this bug was originally reported on https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-
desktop-helpers/issues/205 where I added a comment with my experience (
https://github.com/ubuntu/snapcraft-desktop-
helpers/issues/205#issuecomment-696781060 ). I thought creating a bug
report on Launchpad in addition would maybe help to track this issue.

The following has happened to me for two times so far:
1) Tried to start Chromium (one time it was via UI/.desktop file, one time it 
was by running 'chromium-browser' in terminal)
2) Chromium didn't launch but instead the helper script 'desktop-launch' (in 
/snap/chromium/1320/bin/desktop-launch) moved files and folders that are 
located on a separate partition to my home directory (detailed description 
below) until I killed it.

Luckily I had a backup, but it caused some work to restore everything.
Really eerie experience, when all of a sudden my files began to get
messed up.

My setup is as follows: The / and /home directory of my main
installation (Kubuntu 20.04) are on a SSD drive, while there is also a
much bigger HDD as a second drive where I store all of my "bigger" data
(photos, music, videos etc.). The HDD partition is mounted unter
/mnt/my_hdd and there are symbolic links in my home directory to its
directories (e.g. ~/photos is a symlink to /mnt/my_hdd/photos).

Now what desktop-launch seemed to do was to move the files and
directorys of this symlinked directories (HDD) to my home directory
(SSD). E.g. ~/photos/* (actually stored on /mnt/my_hdd/photos/) was
moved to ~/*. Subdirectories like photos/album1 were kept intact, but
all the content of the "top level folders" of my HDD (music, videos,
photos, ...) got mixed up together in my home directory. In both cases I
noticed there's something going wrong and managed to kill desktop-launch
after a short time, otherwise, it would have filled up all the small
space on my SSD.

This can be a cause of data loss without having a backup, because 1) it
destroys directory structures by moving files/folders from different
directories into one (as described above), and 2) related to that mv
could silently overwrite files with different ones which have the same
name.

Can I provide any further information to help to debug this? I'm not
sure how I can reproduce this, since in all cases except the two ones
recently Chromium startup worked just fine. Fortunately I'm using
Chromium only for testing purposes, so I don't launch it that often and
can make btrfs snapshots before doing so and taking that risk again.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: chromium-browser (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-48.52-generic 5.4.60
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-48-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.9
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Sat Oct  3 09:19:51 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (177 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898334

Title:
  When starting Chromium, desktop-launch sometimes moves personal files
  and folders on separate partition to my home directoy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chromium-browser/+bug/1898334/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-09-30 Thread Jan Rathmann
Still happening with Kubuntu daily-live image 20200930.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning
  fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-09-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
This happens also when I try to install Kubuntu Groovy, the only thing
that's different is that after the "grub-install /dev/sda failed" dialog
there is for 1-2 seconds a window telling "Sorry the installer had
crashed" which disappears again without interventention, and then there
is dialog with the following message:

"The installer encountered an unrecoverable error. A desktop session
will now be run so that you may investigate the problem or try
installing again."

That dialog sends you to the live session.

But that seems to be the only difference between Kubuntu and Ubuntu -
the installation will boot despite the failure, but is "not complete",
as described above.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning
  fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] [NEW] Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-09-02 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

trying to install current daily-live images of Groovy in VirtualBox
fails for me when I'm using manual partitioning.

Steps to reproduce:

1. Partition layout I have used in VirtualBox:
 * Partition table: MBR
 * A single primary ext4 partition (/dev/sda1) using up the entire virtual 
harddisk with 1 MB free space before start of the partition
2. Boot current Groovy daily-live image, click on "Install Ubuntu"
3. Choose "Something else" (manual partitioning)
4. Select /dev/sda1 as target for '/', check "format partition".
5. Ignore warning about missing EFI system partition.

Result:

The installation proceeds until GRUB is about to be installed.
Then an error dialog appears: "Executing 'grub-install /dev/sda' failed. This 
is a fatal error." (screenshot attached).
If I click 'Ok', after a moment Ubiquity nevertheless shows the usual dialog 
saying "Installation is complete. Please restart." The only option the dialog 
offered was to click on "Restart now".
After that, booting the failed installation succeeds, but it is obvious that 
Ubiquity couldn't complete its job: Packages like ubiquity itself, which 
usually get purged from the fresh system at the end of a successful 
installation, are still installed. There is also a pop-up in gnome-shell 
showing an error regarding package management (screenshot attached, not sure if 
this is related to the failed install). 

To send this report, I was running 'sudo ubuntu-bug ubiquity' on the
"failed", but nevertheless booting fresh installation.

Kind regards, Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubiquity 20.10.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu45
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Wed Sep  2 16:55:14 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-42-generic 
root=UUID=6ba06971-16c7-4df6-afcc-3bc101cba9a5 ro quiet splash
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy

** Attachment added: "Error dialog of Grub installation failed"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964/+attachment/5407015/+files/Bildschirmfoto_20200902_141456.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning
  fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1893964] Re: Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

2020-09-02 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of package management error when booting the 
failed installation"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+attachment/5407020/+files/Bildschirmfoto_20200902_172327.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1893964

Title:
  Installation of Ubuntu Groovy in VirtualBox with manual partitioning
  fails on 'grub-install /dev/sda'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1893964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 690926] Re: Installer forces you to install grub somewhere

2020-05-06 Thread Jan Rathmann
This report is still valid for all recent Ubuntu versions (including
Focal).

** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/690926

Title:
  Installer forces you to install grub somewhere

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/690926/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873785] Re: Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit anymore

2020-04-22 Thread Jan Rathmann
Steve, thanks for the hint to the discussion.

So if I got this right, I could restore the behaviour of previous Ubuntu
versions by setting fs.protected_regular=0.

For my personal purpose of backing up files with rsync, I found out that
I can also work around this by _not_ using the --inplace option of rsync
in my backup script. It seems that I actually don't need to use this
option for my usecase, and not using it seems to avoid the scenario
where root has to write to files in sticky directories belonging to
different users (instead rsync can just make an updated copy and delete
the original file).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873785

Title:
  Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit
  anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/1873785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873924] [NEW] Menu entries generated for other linux installations on lvm volumes point to /dev/dm-X as root filesystem which can result in boot failures

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

this is some bug in the generation of grub.cfg that I have seen on all
Ubuntu releases during the last years (can't recall when this first
happened - sorry!) - now I finally manage to report it :-)

On the grub.cfg generated on my system only the menu entry of my main
Ubuntu installation contains a direct reference to the actual name of
the volume group/logical volume in the "linux line", e.g.:

...
linux   /@/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-24-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/internal--ssd-roothome ro ...
...

This is fine.

But on entries that are generated for linux installations on other
logical volumes (which are booted by grub of my main installation) the
"linux line" contains only a reference to "/dev/dm-X", e.g.:

...
linux /boot/vmlinuz root=/dev/dm-4
...

The problem is that there seems to be no constant assignment of volume 
group/logical volume names to "/dev/dm-X" names between reboots, maybe because 
I have two drives (one SSD with volume group "internal-ssd"; one HDD with 
volume group "internal-hdd") on my system.
The result is that the menu entries generated this way sometimes fails to boot 
because "root=/dev/dm-X" points to the wrong logical volume. I can workaround 
this only by either editing /boot/grub.cfg or editing the menu entries during 
boot to make them point to the actual name of the logical volume 
("root=/dev/mapper/internal--hdd-test1" instead of "root=/dev/dm-0").

So the fix for this issue would be that the entries for other linux
installations in grub.cfg would be generated that way that they
reference the actual v-group/lv-name of the respective root filesystem
instead of volatile /dev/dm-X.

I have attached my grub.cfg below.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: grub2 (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Apr 20 19:01:14 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (12 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
SourcePackage: grub2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "grub.cfg"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873924/+attachment/5357214/+files/grub.cfg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873924

Title:
  Menu entries generated for other linux installations on lvm volumes
  point to /dev/dm-X as root filesystem which can result in boot
  failures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1873924/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873785] Re: Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit anymore

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Rathmann
As additional information, I tested if using the Eoan kernel with Focal
would do any difference on this - it didn't, so this seems not to be
dependent on the kernel version in Focal.

** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  in Focal the behaviour has changed when a program running as root tries
  to modify a file which belongs to a user/group other than root in a
  directory with sticky bit set.
  
  I'm not sure if this is a bug or the behaviour is intentional (for
  certain security reasons).
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  - Boot current Focal daily iso
  - Open terminal
  - Create a directory with sticky bit set (chmod o+t; or use an existing 
directory with sticky bit, e.g. /var/crash )
- - Create an empty file with user:group set to anything different that root 
(e.g. ubuntu:ubuntu, ubuntu:whoospie, ...)
+ - Create an empty file with user:group set to anything different than root 
(e.g. ubuntu:ubuntu, ubuntu:whoopsie, ...)
  - Open the file with nano running as root (sudo nano testfile.txt), write 
something in it, and try to save it. This won't work and gives a "permission 
denied" error message.
  
  This behaviour is different than in previous Ubuntu versions. In Eoan it
  is possible to modify the file as root in the scenario described above.
  
  I discovered this because after changing my main installation to Eoan I
  noticed that I got weird error messages from rsync when backing up my
  root subvolume. In my backup script rsync runs as root, and can't update
  backed up contents of /var/crash or /var/spool/cups/tmp anymore because
  it isn't allowed to modify the respective files anymore.
  
  For me personally this is a regression compared to previous Ubuntu
  versions where I never saw such errors during backup.
  
  Whether PAM is the appropriate package to report this bug against I'm
  not sure, so please feel free to assign it to the correct package.
  
  If this is intentional, does anybody have a clue how to work around this
  for use cases like backup with rsync?
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libpam-runtime 1.3.1-5ubuntu4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Mon Apr 20 12:11:32 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (11 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: pam
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873785

Title:
  Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit
  anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1873785/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873785] [NEW] Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit anymore

2020-04-20 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

in Focal the behaviour has changed when a program running as root tries
to modify a file which belongs to a user/group other than root in a
directory with sticky bit set.

I'm not sure if this is a bug or the behaviour is intentional (for
certain security reasons).

Steps to reproduce:

- Boot current Focal daily iso
- Open terminal
- Create a directory with sticky bit set (chmod o+t; or use an existing 
directory with sticky bit, e.g. /var/crash )
- Create an empty file with user:group set to anything different that root 
(e.g. ubuntu:ubuntu, ubuntu:whoospie, ...)
- Open the file with nano running as root (sudo nano testfile.txt), write 
something in it, and try to save it. This won't work and gives a "permission 
denied" error message.

This behaviour is different than in previous Ubuntu versions. In Eoan it
is possible to modify the file as root in the scenario described above.

I discovered this because after changing my main installation to Eoan I
noticed that I got weird error messages from rsync when backing up my
root subvolume. In my backup script rsync runs as root, and can't update
backed up contents of /var/crash or /var/spool/cups/tmp anymore because
it isn't allowed to modify the respective files anymore.

For me personally this is a regression compared to previous Ubuntu
versions where I never saw such errors during backup.

Whether PAM is the appropriate package to report this bug against I'm
not sure, so please feel free to assign it to the correct package.

If this is intentional, does anybody have a clue how to work around this
for use cases like backup with rsync?

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: libpam-runtime 1.3.1-5ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Apr 20 12:11:32 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (11 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: pam
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: pam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  in Focal the behaviour has changed when a program running as root tries
  to modify a file which belongs to a user/group other than root in a
  directory with sticky bit set.
  
  I'm not sure if this is a bug or the behaviour is intentional (for
  certain security reasons).
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  - Boot current Focal daily iso
  - Open terminal
  - Create a directory with sticky bit set (chmod o+t; or use an existing 
directory with sticky bit, e.g. /var/crash )
  - Create an empty file with user:group set to anything different that root 
(e.g. ubuntu:ubuntu, ubuntu:whoospie, ...)
  - Open the file with nano running as root (sudo nano testfile.txt), write 
something in it, and try to save it. This won't work and gives a "permission 
denied" error message.
  
  This behaviour is different than in previous Ubuntu versions. In Eoan it
  is possible to modify the file as root in the scenario described above.
  
  I discovered this because after changing my main installation to Eoan I
  noticed that I got weird error messages from rsync when backing up my
  root subvolume. In my backup script rsync runs as root, and can't update
  backed up contents of /var/crash or /var/spool/cups/tmp anymore because
  it isn't allowed to modify the respective files anymore.
  
  For me personally this is a regression compared to previous Ubuntu
  versions where I never saw such errors during backup.
  
  Whether PAM is the appropriate package to report this bug against I'm
  not sure, so please feel free to assign it to the correct package.
  
- If this is intentional, does anybode have a clue how to work around this
+ If this is intentional, does anybody have a clue how to work around this
  for use cases like backup with rsync?
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: libpam-runtime 1.3.1-5ubuntu4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-24.28-generic 5.4.30
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-24-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Mon Apr 20 12:11:32 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (11 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: pam
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873785

Title:
  Root can't modify files of other users in directories with sticky bit
  anymore

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1872492] Re: Setting in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf causes Arimo font to be rendered weirdly in Firefox

2020-04-13 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Arimo in Firefox with passage in 56-kubuntu-noto.conf 
commented out, correct rendering"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1872492/+attachment/5353350/+files/Screenshot_20200413_171725.png

** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  I discovered that the font Arimo from the package fonts-croscore is
  rendered in weird way in Firefox.
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  - On Kubuntu Focal install package fonts-croscore
  - Open a website that has text where Arimo gets chosen as font (Arimo seems 
to be considered as the default font for sans-serif text by Firefox when it is 
installed)
  - The text looks a bit weird an ugly (at least to me)
  - Compare the text in Firefox with the same text in LibreOffice Writer 
(choose Arimo as font)
  
  In other applications as Firefox (e.g. LibreOffice, KDE Font Viewer,
  Chromium) Arimo looks exactly the same as the font Liberation Sans.
  
  I managed to track this down - since the font is rendered correctly in
- Ubuntu with Gnome desktop, I looked for Kubuntu specific font settings
- and found out that the following passage in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56
- -kubuntu-noto.conf is responsible for the bad rendering:
+ Firefox on Ubuntu with Gnome desktop, I looked for Kubuntu specific font
+ settings and found out that the following passage in
+ /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf is responsible for the bad
+ rendering:
  
  
- 
- Arimo
- true
- hintfull
- false
-  
+ 
+ Arimo
+ true
+ hintfull
+ false
+  
  
  If I comment this out, then Firefox renders text in Arimo correctly like
  all other applications.
  
  I have attached two screenshots that compare the rendering in Firefox
  with default settings and with the respective passage in
  /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf commented out.
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: kubuntu-settings-desktop 1:20.04.8
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu26
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Mon Apr 13 17:19:21 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (5 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: kubuntu-settings
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872492

Title:
  Setting in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf causes Arimo
  font to be rendered weirdly in Firefox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1872492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872492] [NEW] Setting in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf causes Arimo font to be rendered weirdly in Firefox

2020-04-13 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

I discovered that the font Arimo from the package fonts-croscore is
rendered in weird way in Firefox.

Steps to reproduce:

- On Kubuntu Focal install package fonts-croscore
- Open a website that has text where Arimo gets chosen as font (Arimo seems to 
be considered as the default font for sans-serif text by Firefox when it is 
installed)
- The text looks a bit weird an ugly (at least to me)
- Compare the text in Firefox with the same text in LibreOffice Writer (choose 
Arimo as font)

In other applications as Firefox (e.g. LibreOffice, KDE Font Viewer,
Chromium) Arimo looks exactly the same as the font Liberation Sans.

I managed to track this down - since the font is rendered correctly in
Firefox on Ubuntu with Gnome desktop, I looked for Kubuntu specific font
settings and found out that the following passage in
/etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf is responsible for the bad
rendering:



Arimo
true
hintfull
false
 

If I comment this out, then Firefox renders text in Arimo correctly like
all other applications.

I have attached two screenshots that compare the rendering in Firefox
with default settings and with the respective passage in
/etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf commented out.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: kubuntu-settings-desktop 1:20.04.8
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu26
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Mon Apr 13 17:19:21 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (5 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: kubuntu-settings
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: kubuntu-settings (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "Arimo in Firefox default rendering"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872492/+attachment/5353346/+files/Screenshot_20200413_171631.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872492

Title:
  Setting in /etc/fonts/conf.avail/56-kubuntu-noto.conf causes Arimo
  font to be rendered weirdly in Firefox

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-settings/+bug/1872492/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872075] Re: Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

2020-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
Rik, yes the package from your PPA fixes this for me.
Thanks for you quick reaction!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872075

Title:
  Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdeconnect-desktop/+bug/1872075/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872075] Re: Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

2020-04-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
I get the following more detailed output from kdeconnectd:

kdeconnect.plugin.sftp: stdout: "Unable to negotiate with 192.168.2.103 port 
1747: no matching key exchange method found. Their offer: 
diffie-hellman-group14-sha1,diffie-hellman-group1-sha1\r\n"
kdeconnect.plugin.sftp: stdout: "read: Connection reset by peer\n"
kdeconnect.plugin.sftp: Process failed (exit code: 1 )

This seems to be the relevant upstream bug report:
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417787

** Bug watch added: KDE Bug Tracking System #417787
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417787

** Also affects: kdeconnect-desktop via
   https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=417787
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872075

Title:
  Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdeconnect-desktop/+bug/1872075/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871599] Re: Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

2020-04-11 Thread Jan Rathmann
Can confirm that this seems to be fixed, huge thanks to everyone for you
quick reaction!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871599

Title:
  Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-translations/+bug/1871599/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872075] [NEW] Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

2020-04-10 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

if I try to use KDE Connect on Kubuntu Focal, I can't access the phone's
filesystem anymore.

If I click on the phone icon in Dolphin, I get the following error
message:

"Error when accessing filesystem. sshfs finished with exit code 1."
(see also attached screenshot)

This happens the same way on two different phones (BQ Aquaris X, Google
Nexus 4), both phones have KDE Connect 1.13.7 from F-Droid repository
installed.

What I've tried to fix this:

- Unpair/Pair the phone
- Deleting ~/.config/kdeconnect
- Test in a different, pristine installation of Kubuntu Focal

Neither of that helped.

Before Focal I used Kubuntu Eoan with Kubuntu Backports PPA enabled. On
Eoan, I could access the filesystems of both phones without any problem,
so this seems to be somehow related to a change in Focal.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: kdeconnect 1.4-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu24
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Fri Apr 10 15:05:09 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
SourcePackage: kdeconnect
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: kdeconnect (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of error message when trying to access the 
phone's filesystem"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872075/+attachment/5351351/+files/Screenshot_20200410_150411.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872075

Title:
  Can't access phone filesystem with KDE Connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdeconnect/+bug/1872075/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871599] Re: Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

2020-04-08 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of mistranslated german entries of Kubuntu 
boot menu"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gfxboot/+bug/1871599/+attachment/5349406/+files/IMG_20200408_085549.jpg

** Description changed:

  Hello,
  
  while testing the current daily live image of Kubuntu Focal, I
  discovered that the menu entries of the boot menu got wrong
  translations.
  
  Steps to reproduce:
  
  - Boot from USB stick with live image (System without UEFI)
  - After BIOS setup finished, press F2 to open the "Select language" menu
  - Select "Deutsch"
  
  Now the boot menu entries are translated, but with wrong translations
  (see also attached screenshots):
  
- EnglishGerman (wrong)
+ English  | German (wrong)
  --
- "Start Kubuntu" ---> "Nur freie Programme" (Only free software) right 
translation: "Kubuntu starten")
+ "Start Kubuntu" --->  "Nur freie Programme" (Only free software) 
right translation: "Kubuntu starten")
+ 
  "Start Kubuntu (safe graphics)" (this one is not translated)
- "Check disc for defects" ---> "Edubuntu installieren" (Install Edubuntu) 
right translation: "Datenträger auf Fehler überprüfen")
- "Test memory" ---> "Kubuntu starten" (Start Kubuntu) right translation: 
"Arbeitsspeicher prüfen")
- "Boot from first hard disk" ---> "Edubuntu im Textmodus installieren" 
(Install Edubuntu in text mode) right translation: "Von der ersten Festplatte 
starten")
+ 
+ "Check disc for defects"---> "Edubuntu installieren" (Install
+ Edubuntu) right translation: "Datenträger auf Fehler überprüfen")
+ 
+ "Test memory"   ---> "Kubuntu starten" (Start Kubuntu) right
+ translation: "Arbeitsspeicher prüfen")
+ 
+ "Boot from first hard disk" ---> "Edubuntu im Textmodus installieren"
+ (Install Edubuntu in text mode) right translation: "Von der ersten
+ Festplatte starten")
  
  The line at the screen bottom which lists the action of the function
  keys seems also mistranslated.
  
  If I select e.g. the first entry "Nur freie Software", it does what the
  english version of the first entry says (--> Start Kubuntu). So it seems
  that in german all entries got the translation of a different menu item
  assigned (e.g. menu item 4 got the translation of menu item 1).
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: gfxboot-themes (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu24
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: KDE
  Date: Wed Apr  8 11:54:25 2020
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
  SourcePackage: gfxboot
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871599

Title:
  Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gfxboot/+bug/1871599/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871599] [NEW] Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

2020-04-08 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

while testing the current daily live image of Kubuntu Focal, I
discovered that the menu entries of the boot menu got wrong
translations.

Steps to reproduce:

- Boot from USB stick with live image (System without UEFI)
- After BIOS setup finished, press F2 to open the "Select language" menu
- Select "Deutsch"

Now the boot menu entries are translated, but with wrong translations
(see also attached screenshots):

English  | German (wrong)
--
"Start Kubuntu" --->  "Nur freie Programme" (Only free software) 
right translation: "Kubuntu starten")

"Start Kubuntu (safe graphics)" (this one is not translated)

"Check disc for defects"---> "Edubuntu installieren" (Install
Edubuntu) right translation: "Datenträger auf Fehler überprüfen")

"Test memory"   ---> "Kubuntu starten" (Start Kubuntu) right
translation: "Arbeitsspeicher prüfen")

"Boot from first hard disk" ---> "Edubuntu im Textmodus installieren"
(Install Edubuntu in text mode) right translation: "Von der ersten
Festplatte starten")

The line at the screen bottom which lists the action of the function
keys seems also mistranslated.

If I select e.g. the first entry "Nur freie Software", it does what the
english version of the first entry says (--> Start Kubuntu). So it seems
that in german all entries got the translation of a different menu item
assigned (e.g. menu item 4 got the translation of menu item 1).

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: gfxboot-themes (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-21.25-generic 5.4.27
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu24
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Wed Apr  8 11:54:25 2020
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-04-08 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Beta amd64 (20200408)
SourcePackage: gfxboot
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gfxboot (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal kubuntu

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of english entries of Kubuntu boot menu"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871599/+attachment/5349403/+files/IMG_20200408_085530.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871599

Title:
  Live image boot menu entries of Kubuntu are mistranslated

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gfxboot/+bug/1871599/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-09-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
For me the version in bionic-proposed also seems to work fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-24 Thread Jan Rathmann
Kai-Heng, the bug seems to be gone on my system with your newest kernel
in #63 and I don't experience any regression so far. Thanks for your
work!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-07 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Kai-Heng
I can confirm what Erik says - my network card seems to come up properly after 
suspend with the backported kernel in #39.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-05 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Kai-Heng
I did that, with net-next directly it seems that everything is working again at 
least as good as in 4.15.0-23 (Network card comes up at boot, and also after 
suspend.

So hopefully this got fixed in net-next.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Kai-Heng
With this kernel version, unfortunately my network doesn't come up at all (even 
after fresh power on. Reloading driver does not help).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
Ok, I can confirm what I wrote on #28 on another installation.

Very hard for me to tackle this down - since bisecting obviously didn't
work.

Here is a summary of what I found out about this bug:

- Artful (or any other previous Ubuntu version) was not affected (at least not 
to that extend, see below).
- Debian 9 is also not affected.
- On previous Ubuntu versions, I could observe something regarding networking 
and suspend, that may also be a bug, but had a much less severe impact on daily 
usage: In ~1 out of 10 cases, the network connection was down after suspend, 
but it could be relatively easily be enabled again by deactivating the network 
and activating it again (either via graphical NetworkManager-icon or via 
terminal commands 'nmcli networking off|on'). The difference to the current bug 
is that it was not necessary to reload the kernel driver.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-08-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Kai-Heng
Weird, I reinstalled and tested 4.15.0-23 again, and it seems that with 
4.15.0-23 it can also happen that network is not coming up after suspend and 
the driver has to be reloaded.
I'm going to further test this on another installation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-07-26 Thread Jan Rathmann
I have to correct myself a bit: Network coming up correctly after
suspend only works from time to time. On the cases where it's not
working, the driver still has to be reloaded.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: r8169 no internet after suspending

2018-07-25 Thread Jan Rathmann
This patch did help, my network comes up again after suspend with that
kernel version. Thanks alot!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  r8169 no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: no internet after suspending

2018-07-22 Thread Jan Rathmann
During the last days I tried to bisect the commit that caused the
regression, but I'm not sure if the result is correct.

According to git the bad commit is
b489141369f78ead6ed540cff29ac1974852cd7f

Can anyone confirm?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: no internet after suspending

2018-07-12 Thread Jan Rathmann
I have tested https://people.canonical.com/~khfeng/lp1779817-2/ , and it
still does not fix the bug for me.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: no internet after suspending

2018-07-06 Thread Jan Rathmann
Kai-Heng, I have tested mainline kernel 4.18-rc3 from
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v4.18-rc3/ and it seems
not to fix the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1779817] Re: no internet after suspending

2018-07-05 Thread Jan Rathmann
Kai-Heng:
I have tried the kernel under https://people.canonical.com/~khfeng/lp1779817/ 
and I see no change on my system (bug still there; reloading network driver 
after resume from suspend is still necessary).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779817

Title:
  no internet after suspending

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1779817/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752772] Re: r8169 ethernet card don't work after returning from suspension

2018-07-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
Btw. I have tested this with two separate 18.04 installations on
different partitions of my PC.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752772

Title:
  r8169 ethernet card don't work after returning from suspension

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1752772/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752772] Re: r8169 ethernet card don't work after returning from suspension

2018-07-04 Thread Jan Rathmann
For me the update makes things worse instead of better.

Before installing the updated kernel, it only happened from time to time
that the ethernet driver had locked up after suspend (and thus needed to
be reseted by removing and reloading the module via modprobe).

With the updated linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic installed, it seems to
happen _every_ time when I susped that the driver locks up (and needs to
be manually reseted). That's quite uncomfortably when the PC is
suspended a few times a day and has to be manually fixed by modprobe
every time.

Kind regards,
Jan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752772

Title:
  r8169 ethernet card don't work after returning from suspension

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1752772/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1675496] Re: Scrollbars are tiny in Firefox 52

2018-02-27 Thread Jan Rathmann
The described issue with the scrollbar size still exists on Bionic (and
all newer Firefox versions).

** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- Scrollbars are tiny in Firefox 52
+ Scrollbars are tiny in Firefox (since FF 52)

** Description changed:

+ == Update 2018-02-27: While this report was created for Firefox 52 under
+ Ubuntu 16.10, it is still valid for all newer Firefox version/Ubuntu
+ releases. ==
+ 
  In Firefox 52, the size of scrollbars has become smaller so that it is
  really tiny and hard to grab by the mouse. For me, this is a usability
  issue.
  
  The scrollbars were considerably bigger in Firefox 51 and previous
  releases. To illustrate this, I have attached two screeenshots for
  comparision between Firefox 51 and 52.
  
  While other GTK3-applications (e.g. Gedit) also have very slim
  scrollbars, they on the other hand have a mechanismn that makes their
  scrollbars broaden automatically when you move the mouse over them, so
  grabbing them isn't an issue. If the same would be possible in Firefox,
  this would of course be also an acceptable resolution.
  
  Kind regards,
  Jan
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
  Package: firefox 52.0.1+build2-0ubuntu0.16.10.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-43.46-generic 4.8.17
  Uname: Linux 4.8.0-43-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
  AddonCompatCheckDisabled: False
  ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.2
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
-  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
-  /dev/snd/controlC1:  jan2427 F pulseaudio
-  /dev/snd/controlC0:  jan2427 F pulseaudio
+  USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
+  /dev/snd/controlC1:  jan2427 F pulseaudio
+  /dev/snd/controlC0:  jan2427 F pulseaudio
  BuildID: 20170317212642
  Channel: Unavailable
  CurrentDesktop: Unity
  Date: Thu Mar 23 17:48:02 2017
  DefaultProfileExtensions: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  DefaultProfileIncompatibleExtensions: Unavailable (corrupt or non-existant 
compatibility.ini or extensions.sqlite)
  DefaultProfileLocales: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  DefaultProfilePlugins: Shockwave Flash - 
/usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
  DefaultProfilePrefSources: prefs.js
  DefaultProfileThemes: extensions.sqlite corrupt or missing
  ForcedLayersAccel: False
  IfupdownConfig:
-  # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
-  auto lo
-  iface lo inet loopback
+  # interfaces(5) file used by ifup(8) and ifdown(8)
+  auto lo
+  iface lo inet loopback
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-10-11 (163 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.10 "Yakkety Yak" - Alpha amd64 (20161008)
  IpRoute:
-  default via 192.168.2.1 dev enp4s0  proto static  metric 100 
-  192.168.2.0/24 dev enp4s0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.110  
metric 100
+  default via 192.168.2.1 dev enp4s0  proto static  metric 100
+  192.168.2.0/24 dev enp4s0  proto kernel  scope link  src 192.168.2.110  
metric 100
  IwConfig:
-  enp4s0no wireless extensions.
-  
-  vboxnet0  no wireless extensions.
-  
-  lono wireless extensions.
+  enp4s0no wireless extensions.
+ 
+  vboxnet0  no wireless extensions.
+ 
+  lono wireless extensions.
  MostRecentCrashID: bp-fd3ffe0d-b587-4fd6-9f51-0e92e2161201
  Profile0IncompatibleExtensions:
-  English (South Africa) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  Deutsch (DE) Language Pack - langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
+  English (South Africa) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  Deutsch (DE) Language Pack - langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
  Profile0Plugins: Shockwave Flash - 
/usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
  Profile0PrefSources:
-  prefs.js
-  user.js
-  
[Profile]/extensions/{3d7eb24f-2740-49df-8937-200b1cc08f8a}/defaults/preferences/flashblock.js
+  prefs.js
+  user.js
+  
[Profile]/extensions/{3d7eb24f-2740-49df-8937-200b1cc08f8a}/defaults/preferences/flashblock.js
  Profile1IncompatibleExtensions:
-  English (South Africa) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  Deutsch (DE) Language Pack - langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
-  Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
+  English (South Africa) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  Deutsch (DE) Language Pack - langpack...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  English (GB) Language Pack - langpack-en...@firefox.mozilla.org
+  Default - {972ce4c6-7e08-4474-a285-3208198ce6fd}
  Profile1Plugins: Shockwave Flash - 
/usr/lib/flashplugin-installer/libflashplayer.so
  Profile1PrefSources:
-  prefs.js
-  user.js
+  prefs.js
+  user.js
  Profile2IncompatibleExtensions:
- 

[Bug 1727842] Re: Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after upgrade to 17.10

2018-01-05 Thread Jan Rathmann
I can also confirm that toggling the Commands-plugin in CCSM is a
temporary workaround for the bug on my system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727842

Title:
  Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after
  upgrade to 17.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1727842] Re: Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after upgrade to 17.10

2017-12-21 Thread Jan Rathmann
I did some testing during the last days, and still this bug remains
really strange.. I could not find a way to really reliable reproduce it
or make it disappear.

I did several clean test installations of Ubuntu 17.10 and made the following 
steps after installation:
- First boot, log in (Gnome desktop starts)
- Install Unity: apt install unity-session, reboot
- Second boot, select Unity at GDM login
- Test if media keys, power button etc. work. Usually, it seems that the bug 
does _not_ appear on this second boot.
- Do nothing else, reboot.
- Third boot: Log in to Unity, test again, if keys work. Usually, the bug 
appears this time.
- On further reboots of the system, the bug may appear or not.

Then I did some testing with running 'unity-session-daemon --debug -r', and 
found out that it is possible to make the bug randomly appear or disappear by 
restarting unity-session-daemon.
The first briefly tests were run on my clean test installation, and afterwards 
I did some more exhaustive testing on my "main" Ubuntu installation, where the 
bug had appeared permanently so far.

During this "exhaustive testing" I repeatedly restarted u-s-d and
checked every time if the keys were working. I had to do this
approximately 15 times, until the bug disappeared for the first time and
the keys worked!

I am attaching two log files:
- One containing a log of unity-settings-daemon where media keys etc. _did_ work
- Another one with a log of u-s-d where the bug appeared and they didn't work

Kind regards,
Jan

** Attachment added: "Log file of start of 'unity-settings-daemon --debug -r' 
that lead to working keys"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+attachment/5025609/+files/unity-settings-daemon%20working%20keybindings.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727842

Title:
  Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after
  upgrade to 17.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1727842] Re: Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after upgrade to 17.10

2017-12-21 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Attachment added: "Log file of start of 'unity-settings-daemon --debug -r' 
that lead to not-working keys"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+attachment/5025610/+files/unity-settings-daemon%20not-working%20keybindings.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727842

Title:
  Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after
  upgrade to 17.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1727842] Re: Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after upgrade to 17.10

2017-12-17 Thread Jan Rathmann
I did another test: I mounted my home partition which I normally use
only on my primary Ubuntu installation (the one affected by the bug, see
comment #8) on my secondary installation (the one _not_ affected by the
bug).

The result was interesting: The bug did not appear when booting this
secondary installation with my "primary" home partition mounted as
/home. The volume keys and other hotkeys still worked as exspected.

So this seemes to narrow down the problem cause a bit. Apparently, the
bug has nothing to do with anything contained in the /home-directory.
And, like described in #8, it seems to have nothing to do with certain
packages installed, because I couldn't reproduce the bug by installing
the same package selection on both systems.

So the cause of the bug seems to be "something system-wide" - like a
different configuration option somewhere where I have no idea what had
introduced it. I tried to spot some configuration differences by
comparing /etc directories of both installations via diff - but none of
the few differences seemes to be related to the problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727842

Title:
  Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after
  upgrade to 17.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725680] Re: DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

2017-12-14 Thread Jan Rathmann
@Sebastien
Well, hmmm, it is possible that #1727237 is the same bug. The wifi I was using 
at that time was a bit weird in regards of having a captive portal: It seemed 
to me that it was implemented to show a captive portal in principle when 
connecting to it. But while some other people around were directed to that 
captive portal everytime they connected to the wifi, I saw it on my devices 
(Android phone and the laptop where I send this report from) only at the first 
connection - then I regularily connected to this wifi for months(!) and the 
captive portal was never shown again to me! And that's the reason why I even 
forgot to metion it at all in this bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725680

Title:
  DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1725680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1727842] Re: Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after upgrade to 17.10

2017-12-14 Thread Jan Rathmann
I'm seeing this problem too.

What's really confusing for me is:

1. I have two fresh installs of Ubuntu 17.10 on different partitions

2. This bug occurs only on one of those installations; all keybindings
work fine on the other one!

3. On the affected installation, the bug also occurs on freshly created,
pristine user accounts.

4. I tried to reproduce the bug by making those two installations as
similar as possible. E.g. I installed the same packages on the
unaffected installation that I had installed on the affected
installation - but still the bug did not appear there!

5. The main difference between those installations is that the affected
one uses an exitisting home partition where all those
application/desktop envirement configuration files of my main user
account are existing since a long number of previous Ubuntu releases.
While the unaffected installation doesn't use that home partition and a
completely fresh home directory was created for the main user account.
Well, one could think the bug is caused by some sort of faulty/"rotten"
configuration file - but that doesn't explain, why freshly created user
accounts on this installation are also affected from this bug (as
described in 3. )...

The affected keybindings for me are (at least) application shortcuts
(e.g. Ctrl + Alt + t), Volume keys and the Print-Button (which normally
would make a screenshot).

Kind regards,
Jan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727842

Title:
  Volume and Mute buttons on keyboard not doing anything in Unity after
  upgrade to 17.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1727842/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725680] Re: DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

2017-12-11 Thread Jan Rathmann
I was finally able to test, if I could reproduce the bug on a WPA2
encrypted private wifi network. And interestingly I couldn't - DNS
resolution worked fine when booting a live session and connecting to the
private network.

So it is possible that the behaviour I described in this report may be
some sort of corner case related to  the wifi network I was using 1,5
months ago.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725680

Title:
  DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1725680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725680] Re: DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

2017-10-22 Thread Jan Rathmann
Yes, my wifi provides a DNS nameserver. It's adress is 192.168.44.1, and
it is shown when I open System Settings --> WLAN and click on the
properties of the connected network. When I manually add this DNS server
to resolv.conf, DNS resolution will start working.

What I'm currently using is some sort of a "public facility wifi", where
anyone can connect freely to without any authentification (and without
encryption). Unfortunately, this is the only network I can test ATM, so
I don't know if if would be different on e.g. a WPA2-encrypted private
wifi.

Here is the output of the two commands:

$ systemd-resolve --status
Global
  DNSSEC NTA: 10.in-addr.arpa
  16.172.in-addr.arpa
  168.192.in-addr.arpa
  17.172.in-addr.arpa
  18.172.in-addr.arpa
  19.172.in-addr.arpa
  20.172.in-addr.arpa
  21.172.in-addr.arpa
  22.172.in-addr.arpa
  23.172.in-addr.arpa
  24.172.in-addr.arpa
  25.172.in-addr.arpa
  26.172.in-addr.arpa
  27.172.in-addr.arpa
  28.172.in-addr.arpa
  29.172.in-addr.arpa
  30.172.in-addr.arpa
  31.172.in-addr.arpa
  corp
  d.f.ip6.arpa
  home
  internal
  intranet
  lan
  local
  private
  test

Link 3 (wlp7s0)
  Current Scopes: DNS LLMNR/IPv4 LLMNR/IPv6
   LLMNR setting: yes
MulticastDNS setting: no
  DNSSEC setting: no
DNSSEC supported: no
 DNS Servers: 192.168.44.1
  DNS Domain: lan

Link 2 (enp9s0)
  Current Scopes: none
   LLMNR setting: yes
MulticastDNS setting: no
  DNSSEC setting: no
DNSSEC supported: no


--

$ sudo NetworkManager --print-config
# NetworkManager configuration: /etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf (lib: 
10-dns-resolved.conf, 20-connectivity-ubuntu.conf) (run: 
10-globally-managed-devices.conf) (etc: default-wifi-powersave-on.conf)

[main]
# rc-manager=symlink
# auth-polkit=true
# dhcp=dhclient
dns=systemd-resolved
plugins=ifupdown,keyfile

[connectivity]
uri=http://connectivity-check.ubuntu.com/

[ifupdown]
managed=false

[logging]
# backend=journal
# audit=true

[device]
wifi.scan-rand-mac-address=no

[connection]
wifi.powersave=3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725680

Title:
  DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1725680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725680] Re: DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

2017-10-21 Thread Jan Rathmann
I just tested that disabling systemd-resolved seems to be a good
permanent workaround for me (according to the description under
https://askubuntu.com/questions/907246/how-to-disable-systemd-resolved-
in-ubuntu )

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725680

Title:
  DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1725680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1725680] [NEW] DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

2017-10-21 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

If I boot my laptop with a live image or an installation of Ubuntu
17.10, DNS name resolution doesn't work (which means I can't access any
website).

Steps to reproduce:
- Boot laptop with Ubuntu 17.10 live image
- Connect to my wireless network
- Try to ping any website, e.g. ping ubuntu.com. This immediately fails with 
the error message "Name or service not known"
- Try to ping an IP-adress, e.g. ping 8.8.8.8 : this works.

As a workaround, I can get a temporarily working DNS resolution by
manually editing /etc/resolv.conf (symlink to /run/systemd/resolve/stub-
resolve.conf) and setting the "nameserver" entry to 8.8.8.8 or some
other known DNS server.

On Ubuntu 17.04 this bug is not present.

The original address in /run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolve.conf is
127.0.0.53 . I get immediate replies if I ping this address, but
nevertheless DNS resolution doesn't work.

It seems that the service systemd-networkd isn't active by default:
$ sudo systemctl status systemd-networkd
● systemd-networkd.service - Network Service
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-networkd.service; disabled; vendo
   Active: inactive (dead)
 Docs: man:systemd-networkd.service(8)

Manually starting it doesn't seem to help for this bug.

systemd-resolved is active:

$ sudo systemctl status systemd-resolved
● systemd-resolved.service - Network Name Resolution
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/systemd-resolved.service; enabled; vendor
   Active: active (running) since Sat 2017-10-21 12:13:12 UTC; 44min ago
 Docs: man:systemd-resolved.service(8)
   https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/resolved
   https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/writing-network-con
   https://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/writing-resolver-cl
 Main PID: 1095 (systemd-resolve)
   Status: "Processing requests..."
Tasks: 1 (limit: 4915)
   CGroup: /system.slice/systemd-resolved.service
   └─1095 /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved

Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd[1]: Starting Network Name Resolution...
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd-resolved[1095]: Positive Trust Anchors:
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd-resolved[1095]: . IN DS 19036 8 2 49aac11d7b6f644
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd-resolved[1095]: . IN DS 20326 8 2 e06d44b80b8f1d3
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd-resolved[1095]: Negative trust anchors: 10.in-add
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd-resolved[1095]: Using system hostname 'ubuntu'.
Okt 21 12:13:12 ubuntu systemd[1]: Started Network Name Resolution.

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: systemd 234-2ubuntu12
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-16.19-generic 4.13.4
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-16-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.7-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.387
Date: Sat Oct 21 12:26:00 2017
ExecutablePath: /lib/systemd/systemd-resolved
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
MachineType: Acer Extensa 5635Z
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=C.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
ProcKernelCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/hostname.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash --- maybe-ubiquity
SourcePackage: systemd
SystemdDelta:
 [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf
 [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/user@.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/user@.service.d/timeout.conf
 
 2 overridden configuration files found.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 08/14/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix
dmi.bios.version: V0.3305
dmi.board.name: BA50-MV
dmi.board.vendor: Acer
dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenix:bvrV0.3305:bd08/14/2009:svnAcer:pnExtensa5635Z:pvrNotApplicable:rvnAcer:rnBA50-MV:rvrNotApplicable:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: Extensa 5635Z
dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
dmi.sys.vendor: Acer

** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug artful

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1725680

Title:
  DNS name resolution doesn't work on Artful

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1725680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1683125] Re: [SRU] No translation files included in K3b

2017-04-26 Thread Jan Rathmann
Just a short notice that the version in Proposed works fine for me, too.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683125

Title:
  [SRU] No translation files included in K3b

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/1683125/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 1683125] Re: No translation files included in K3b

2017-04-16 Thread Jan Rathmann
Rik, thanks for your work, I have tested the new version from your PPA,
and now localisation works again correctly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to k3b in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683125

Title:
  No translation files included in K3b

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/1683125/+subscriptions

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1683125] [NEW] No translation files included in K3b

2017-04-16 Thread Jan Rathmann
Public bug reported:

Hello,

the interface of the version of K3b shipped in Zesty is untranslated,
because apparently the respective translation files are not shipped.

A package k3b-i18n, that should contain the translation files, exists,
but it doesn't contain anything (see attached screenshot).

Kind regards,
Jan

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: k3b 2.0.3a+git20170325-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-19.21-generic 4.10.8
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: Unity:Unity7
Date: Sun Apr 16 09:58:28 2017
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-04-14 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
SourcePackage: k3b
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: k3b (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug zesty

** Attachment added: "Screenshot of the content of k3b-i18n"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683125/+attachment/4862992/+files/k3b-i18n.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1683125

Title:
  No translation files included in K3b

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/k3b/+bug/1683125/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1667158] Re: Regression: Borders of windows and desktop background are displayed badly after suspend/resume

2017-04-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
** Description changed:

+ == Update: ==
+ Nvidia states that the bug will be fixed in the next release: 
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/990898/linux/suspend-corrupts-window-manager-after-upgrade-to-378-09/2
+ 
+ == Possible workarounds for the time being ==
+ 
+ - Install nvidia-340 package if that versions supports your card: sudo apt 
install nvidia-340
+ - Downgrade nvidia-367 package. Beware, that this driver version has unfixed 
security holes! Downgrading works in Yakkety, possibly also in Xenial, but 
likely not in Zesty. Command to downgrade: sudo apt install 
nvidia-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 libcuda1-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 
nvidia-opencl-icd-367=367.57-0ubuntu3
+ - Keep nvidia-375 and use the shell script described in comment #13: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1667158/comments/13
+ Beware, this might kill applications like Firefox or Thunderbird on resume!
+ 
+ 
+ Originial text of this bug report:
+ 
  My system graphic driver had just updated to 375.39 but Borders of pop-
  up windows are displayed badly. This is especially true after waking up
  from suspend mode. this driver is buggy. I am using Ubuntu 16.04. Any
  way to rectify this display problem?

** Description changed:

  == Update: ==
  Nvidia states that the bug will be fixed in the next release: 
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/990898/linux/suspend-corrupts-window-manager-after-upgrade-to-378-09/2
  
  == Possible workarounds for the time being ==
  
- - Install nvidia-340 package if that versions supports your card: sudo apt 
install nvidia-340
- - Downgrade nvidia-367 package. Beware, that this driver version has unfixed 
security holes! Downgrading works in Yakkety, possibly also in Xenial, but 
likely not in Zesty. Command to downgrade: sudo apt install 
nvidia-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 libcuda1-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 
nvidia-opencl-icd-367=367.57-0ubuntu3
- - Keep nvidia-375 and use the shell script described in comment #13: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1667158/comments/13
+ - Alternative A: Install nvidia-340 package if that versions supports your 
card: sudo apt install nvidia-340
+ - Alternative B: Keep nvidia-375 and use the shell script described in 
comment #13: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1667158/comments/13
  Beware, this might kill applications like Firefox or Thunderbird on resume!
+ - Alternative C: Downgrade to the nvidia-367 package. Beware, that this 
driver version has unfixed security holes! Downgrading works in Yakkety, 
possibly also in Xenial, but likely not in Zesty. Command to downgrade: sudo 
apt install nvidia-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 libcuda1-367=367.57-0ubuntu3 
nvidia-opencl-icd-367=367.57-0ubuntu3
  
  
  Originial text of this bug report:
  
  My system graphic driver had just updated to 375.39 but Borders of pop-
  up windows are displayed badly. This is especially true after waking up
  from suspend mode. this driver is buggy. I am using Ubuntu 16.04. Any
  way to rectify this display problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667158

Title:
  Regression: Borders of windows and desktop background are displayed
  badly after suspend/resume

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1667158/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1676901] Re: Multicoloured borders around windows and in place of window controls

2017-04-03 Thread Jan Rathmann
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1667158 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1667158

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1667158
   Regression: Borders of windows and desktop background are displayed badly 
after suspend/resume

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1676901

Title:
  Multicoloured borders around windows and in place of window controls

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-375/+bug/1676901/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   5   6   >