[Bug 437862] Re: device key_bitmask has changed
Hello, the bug is also present here, very annoying. After hibernation (which switches console) my X becomes unresponsive and I have to reboot. Jens -- device key_bitmask has changed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/437862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 462558] Re: package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
Hello, same problem here. On going a bit more in detail and installing the packages separately the problem looks to be in libopenmpi-dev. AFAIKS a ciclic dependency for different alternatives of mpicc is introduced. Jens -- package openmpi-bin 1.3.2-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/462558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 256142] Re: Flickering with version 2.4.0
Hi, just adding to this bug, please direct me to an appropriate one if you think there is a better one. I observed the same `underrun' error on for my Intel card after seeking for the reasons of occasional crashes of X that I observed on my machine. First I though that this would be hibernation related, since it was then when this happened. But now I see that it occurs when switching the console. So happening under hibernation is probably just a side effect when switching console, there. I am running xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.4.1-1ubuntu10.1 Has anybody an idea if dowgrading to 2:2.4.1-1ubuntu10 (without the .1) could help? Thanks Jens ** Attachment added: X log of a crash session when switching console http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19972314/%3A0.log.1 -- Flickering with version 2.4.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295906] Re: gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery
Hi, it seems that this is a kernel bug, vanilla 2.6.27.3 doesn't show this bug. So gnome-power-manager (and ubuntu intrepid) is not in cause. Please close, sorry for the noise. Jens ** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295906] [NEW] gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager After upgrading to intrepid I see that problem: When starting with AC plugged in gpm works as expected. When removing AC, gpm blocks somewhere in the middle, with curious symtoms. Eg. if the first of my two batteries is empty it reports that battery is low although the second battery is full. Increasing the brightness gets stuck in the middle with the popup remaining on the screen. I attach a backtrace of such a stuck gpm process. The only thing errornous that I can detect for myself is ~ 11:05 140% gnome-power-manager --no-daemon (gnome-power-manager:13687): GStreamer-WARNING **: Failed to load plugin '/usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libpitfdll.so': /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libpitfdll.so: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32 And yes, this gstreamer library is in 32 whereas all others are 64. But obviously I can't figure out whether it's related. (Could file a separate bug for that if someone thinks its appropriate.) My machine is a Dell Latitude D630, with two batteries, intrepid amd64, vamilla kernel 2.6.27.5 ** Affects: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295906] Re: gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery
** Attachment added: backtrace of stuck gnome-power-manager http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19507857/gpm-bt.txt -- gnome-power-manager blocks in futex when on battery https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295906 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295969] [NEW] regression: g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc This appeared recently when upgrading from gutsy to intrepid. Compiling the following with g++ void toto1(double*const __attribute__((aligned(16))) X); void toto2(double* const (X)[1]); produdes g++-c -o test.o test.cc test.cc:2: error: alignment of array elements is greater than element size Observe the `2' in the error message, the error is reported for toto2. (For toto1 an error would be acceptable, I think). But even worse, if we take void toto0(double* const (X)[1]); void toto1(double*const __attribute__((aligned(16))) X); void toto2(double* const (X)[1]); All three prototypes compile flawlessly. This particular testing was done with 4:4.3.1-1ubuntu2 on an 8.10 amd64, but we observed the same thing on 8.10 i386 Previously, everything was working well on 8.04. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: g++ 4:4.3.1-1ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/tcsh PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/bin LANG=de_DE.iso885915 SourcePackage: gcc-defaults Uname: Linux 2.6.27.5 x86_64 ** Affects: gcc-defaults (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- regression: g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295969] Re: regression: g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19511674/Dependencies.txt -- regression: g++ produces spurious alignment errors for prototypes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295457] [NEW] package emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 failed to install/upgrade:
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: emacs21 when updating to intrepid I ran into this ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: Unterprozess post-installation script gab den Fehlerwert 255 zurück Package: emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 SourcePackage: emacs21 Title: package emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 failed to install/upgrade: Uname: Linux 2.6.27.4 x86_64 ** Affects: emacs21 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295457] Re: package emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 failed to install/upgrade:
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483363/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483364/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483365/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483366/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483367/VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483368/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package emacs21 21.4a+1-5.5 failed to install/upgrade: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295457 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295459] [NEW] package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager happened when upgrading to intrepid ProblemType: Package Architecture: amd64 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ErrorMessage: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Package: update-manager 1:0.93.34 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: update-manager Title: package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Uname: Linux 2.6.27.4 x86_64 ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package -- package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295459 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 295459] Re: package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483424/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483425/VarLogDistupgradeAptlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483426/VarLogDistupgradeApttermlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483427/VarLogDistupgradeMainlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483428/VarLogDistupgradeMainprereqlog.gz ** Attachment added: VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19483429/VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz -- package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/295459 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270429] Re: [MASTER] passwords lost from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2
Hi, I followed Andres advice for downgrading xulrunner. But now firefox wouldn't start and just outputs Could not find compatible GRE between version 1.9.0.1 and 1.9.0.*. Please advice Jens -- [MASTER] passwords lost from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270429] Re: [MASTER] passwords lost from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2
Ok, thanks, so I upgraded again to the new version and then transformed the signons3.txt file as described. Looks that it works well now, I was able to log into launchpad ;-) Jens -- [MASTER] passwords lost from 3.0.1 to 3.0.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176853] Re: wmaster missing in udev
** Also affects: wireless-tools Importance: Undecided Status: New -- wmaster missing in udev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176853 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176853] wmaster missing in udev
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: udev
The new iwlist driver for the intel wireless cards 3945 etc installs a second
`interface' called wmaster.
When upgrading from iwp3945 to ivl3945 udev gets confused and tries to rename
the real interface from
wlan0 to eth1 since there is a corresponding entry in 70-persistent-net.rules.
It gets stuck and ends up with an
interface named wla0_rename.
Fix: adding `wmaster*' to the pattern for network cards in
75-persistent-net-generator.rules worked for me.
It then created a rule in 70-persistent-net.rules:
SUBSYSTEM==net, DRIVERS==?*, ATTRS{address}==x,
NAME=wmaster0
and permitted to leave the one for the real interface
SUBSYSTEM==net, DRIVERS==?*, ATTRS{address}==xx,
ATTRS{type}==1, NAME=eth1
unchanged. In particular this leaves the name of the interface to what it had
been (eth1 for me), which is preferable for
not having to change other scripts.
** Affects: udev (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
wmaster missing in udev
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176853
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 163956] Re: /var/{run|lock} mounted twice
** Changed in: sysvinit (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None = sysvinit
--
/var/{run|lock} mounted twice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 163956] /var/{run|lock} mounted twice
Public bug reported:
Hi
on my system (gutsy) I have
/etc/init.d 2:36 286% grep /var /proc/mounts
tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /var/run tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
tmpfs /var/lock tmpfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec 0 0
/dev/sda8 /var ext3 rw,data=ordered 0 0
I have the impression that the doulble mount of /var/lock and /var/run might be
due to the fact that
/var is an extra partition. Actually in the init.d scripts mount commands for
these occur twice, in mtab.sh and
mountkernfs.sh. Both check well for existance of the mountpoint, but my guess
is that the intermediate
mount of /var inhibits the correct check whence the second attempt is launched
(mtab.sh?).
I don't think that this is critical, but it could eventually result in some
service launched twice, since the
corresponding lock files of the first launch might be hidden.
I also see the interest of having these two fs mounted as early as possible,
but then they should be moved away before
a mount of /var and moved to the new location afterwards (or some similar
acrobacy).
Thanks
Jens
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
/var/{run|lock} mounted twice
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163956
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139635] Re: [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup
``Swâmi'' == Swâmi Petaramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Swâmi I could temporarily work around this by manually copying Swâmi libgcrypt.so.11.2.3 and libgpg-error.so.0.3.0 to /lib, with Swâmi their symlinks, but this is not a satisfactory solution. I have now gone even further, I copied the statically linked executable from http://luks.endorphin.org/dm-crypt and started to use that, now. Swâmi I'm dissatisfied seeing that this bug importance is yet set Swâmi to medium as this can prevent a system from booting ; I Swâmi feel that solving this should be high priority so it Swâmi doesn't hit too many people in the face (those who haven't Swâmi upgraded Feisty = Gutsy yet but may soon do...). IMHO, Swâmi this bug is critical. I completely agree, this *is* critical. To say that loud and clear, if you are currently in Feisty and have encrypted partitions for which you need cryptsetup, DON'T UPGRADE TO GUTSY unless you think you master this bug. In particular, keep a live cd arround. Jens -- [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139635] Re: [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup
Hello, ``Swâmi'' == Swâmi Petaramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Swâmi I agree that static binaries are *much* better for critical Swâmi binaries that are needed to mount filesystems. But if the Swâmi Ubuntu team wants to keep cryptsetup dynamically linked, Swâmi wouldn't there be an easy solution modifying the Swâmi libgcrypt11 and libgpg-error0 so they simply install into Swâmi /lib instead of /usr/lib ? They probably have their reason why they think these belong in /usr/lib. Another would perhaps be an install option, to link against static version of the libraries if they are installed. But I am quite new to Ubuntu, so I can't see how easy this is. But in any case I don't have the impression that much people are too much worried about this bug. First it was declassified and now it is not even assigned to anybody anymore. To be honest, when I switched to Ubuntu recently, I expected a bit more. Jens -- [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 139635] Re: [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup
Yet to report another hit of this bug. Took me some hours to find out why my swap wouldn't come at boot time, altough I followed all the documentation. I am really surprised to find that cryptsetup depends on dynamic libraries. Not only the ones in /usr/lib, but in general it is a bad idea. This executable is critical for the early boot phase, Messing around with it is playing with fire. Found a workaround, which is to list /usr as a dependency in crypdisks, but this only works since I only have swap encrypted for the moment. Thinking of what have happend if I'd just naively had encrypted my root partition. Undermines my confidence in Ubuntu. -- [cryptsetup] library dependency in /sbin/cryptsetup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139635 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
