[Bug 2059271] Re: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
** Changed in: gnome-shell-pomodoro (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059966] Re: Sponsorship: Upload gnome-online-accounts-gtk
Since this has been uploaded to the Ubuntu NEW queue, I am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please feel free to resubscribe if you have something else that needs to be sponsored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059966 Title: Sponsorship: Upload gnome-online-accounts-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2059966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2019137] Re: gnome-software should (?) be separated from the packagekit
This has been done in Debian Unstable and I have requested a Feature Freeze Exception to land these changes in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. See https://launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2019137 Title: gnome-software should (?) be separated from the packagekit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2019137/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split
** Description changed: - As requested by the Ubuntu Release Team, I am providing early notice of - a Feature Freeze Exception I intend to request soon (approximately March - 27) - - What is Needed Now - - - Waiting a few days for review of https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/merge_requests/16 - Impact -- - I request permission to land a change I am making in Debian to split gnome-software's .deb support into a separate package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination. + I request permission to sync the gnome-software packaging from Debian. The biggest change is splitting gnome-software's .deb support into a separate package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination. This has been requested by multiple users on Ubuntu Discourse and at least one Launchpad bug and one Debian bug. - Potential Problems - --- - gnome-software has an explicit Recommend: gnome-software-plugin-deb so that people upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will keep the deb support installed. That recommends will be dropped for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS because it won't be needed then. (There is a Depends on the virtual packages that enable installing apps.) - - Other Related Changes - - - I am dropping the fwupd plugin to Suggests so upgrades to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will likely get it uninstalled and new installs won't have it either unless a user explicitly installs it later. + fwupd plugin + + I am dropping the fwupd plugin (now in a separate package too) to Suggests so upgrades to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will likely get it uninstalled and new installs won't have it either unless a user explicitly installs it later. Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps, there is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb. Because Ubuntu already has update-manager to handle apt update notifications, I am also dropping the autostart file to reduce background RAM use. A few Ubuntu desktop flavors do not provide any firmware updater app at all. Ubuntu Budgie developers thought a firmware updater app was too technical for inclusion in the default Ubuntu 24.04 LTS install. + autostart + - + I have also dropped the autostart file since the fwupd plugin is no longer included by default and Ubuntu already has ways to notify users about available apt updates (update-manager and unattended upgrades) and snaps already automatically update. + + Potential Problems + --- + gnome-software has an explicit Recommend: gnome-software-plugin-deb so that people upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will keep the deb support installed. That recommends will be dropped for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS because it won't be needed then. (There is a Depends on the virtual packages that enable installing apps.) + + + Full Changelog Entries + -- + gnome-software (46.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Fix typo in gnome-software-plugin-deb package description + * Add lintian overrides for desktop-command-not-in-package + + -- Jeremy Bícha Fri, 29 Mar 2024 16:45:30 -0400 + + gnome-software (46.0-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Update Homepage + * Release to Unstable + + -- Jeremy Bícha Thu, 28 Mar 2024 13:23:28 -0400 + + gnome-software (46.0-2) experimental; urgency=medium + + * Split deb support into separate gnome-software-plugin-deb package + (Closes: #1066030) (LP: #2019137, #2056767) + * Have each plugin provide a virtual gnome-software-plugin package + * Suggest all the gnome-software plugins + * Recommend gnome-software-plugin-deb for upgrades + * Split firmware update support into separate fwupd plugin & recommend it + except on Ubuntu which provides a separate firmware-updater app + Intentionally, do not have this provides the virtual gnome-software-plugin + since it doesn't allow browsing apps. + * Drop patch that hides upstreams Software Sources dialog (Closes: #1060803) + * Drop Depends: software-properties-gtk + * Stop recommending gnome-software-plugin-snap on Ubuntu + + -- Jeremy Bícha Wed, 27 Mar 2024 18:33:03 -0400 + + Build Logs + -- + https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+sourcepub/15898505/+listing-archive-extra + Desktop Flavors Affe
[Bug 2059966] Re: Sponsorship: Upload gnome-online-accounts-gtk
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059966 Title: Sponsorship: Upload gnome-online-accounts-gtk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2059966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059967] [NEW] Please remove kylin-display-switch source from Ubuntu
Public bug reported: The kylin-display-switch binary package is now built by the ukui- settings-daemon source package. Please remove the kylin-display-switch source package ** Affects: kylin-display-switch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059967 Title: Please remove kylin-display-switch source from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kylin-display-switch/+bug/2059967/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059271] Re: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
** Changed in: workrave (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split
** Description changed: As requested by the Ubuntu Release Team, I am providing early notice of a Feature Freeze Exception I intend to request soon (approximately March 27) What is Needed Now - Waiting a few days for review of https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/merge_requests/16 Impact -- I request permission to land a change I am making in Debian to split gnome-software's .deb support into a separate package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination. This has been requested by multiple users on Ubuntu Discourse and at least one Launchpad bug and one Debian bug. Potential Problems --- - For new installs, gnome-software has Depends: gnome-software-plugin-deb | gnome-software-plugin. Where gnome-software-plugin is a virtual package provided by each plugin so a user would get gnome-software-plugin-deb installed unless they specifically chose a different plugin or the metapackage they installed did. - - However, I think this won't work right for upgrades. I am going to - investigate whether I can add a ubuntu-release-upgrader quirk to install - gnome-software-plugin-deb for people who already have gnome-software - installed. Maybe I need to treat gnome-software like a metapackage so I - can use PostUpgradeInstall - - Otherwise, people are likely to lose support for installing .debs with - GNOME Software and it is not obvious why. + gnome-software has an explicit Recommend: gnome-software-plugin-deb so that people upgrading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will keep the deb support installed. That recommends will be dropped for Ubuntu 26.04 LTS because it won't be needed then. (There is a Depends on the virtual packages that enable installing apps.) Other Related Changes - - I am dropping the fwupd plugin. Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps, there is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb. + I am dropping the fwupd plugin to Suggests so upgrades to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS will likely get it uninstalled and new installs won't have it either unless a user explicitly installs it later. + + Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu + desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps, there + is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb. Because Ubuntu already has update-manager to handle apt update notifications, I am also dropping the autostart file to reduce background RAM use. A few Ubuntu desktop flavors do not provide any firmware updater app at all. Ubuntu Budgie developers thought a firmware updater app was too technical for inclusion in the default Ubuntu 24.04 LTS install. Desktop Flavors Affected GNOME Software is currently included in the default install for only Ubuntu Cinnamon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059847] Re: Input lag in native terminal
** Tags added: regression-update ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: mutter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059847 Title: Input lag in native terminal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-terminal/+bug/2059847/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059796] [NEW] Other Software > Remove button doesn't work
Public bug reported: Test Case - - Add a PPA - Open the Software & Updates tab - Switch to the Other Software tab - Select the PPA line and click Remove - After Authentication, nothing happens. No error is emitted to the command line. The repo line still shows. The repo is still in /etc/apt/sources.list.d/ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.99.44 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-20.20-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Mar 29 12:06:07 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-06 (723 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Daily amd64 (20220405) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm-256color XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2023-12-09 (111 days ago) ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059796 Title: Other Software > Remove button doesn't work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2059796/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059797] [NEW] Other Software shows extra comment for Ubuntu distribution repository
Public bug reported: Test Case - - Open the Software & Updates tab - Switch to the Other Software tab There is an entry for ## Ubuntu distribution repository ## ## The following settings can be adjusted to configure which packages to use from Ubuntu. etc. What I Expected --- That comment should not show. Selecting the entry and clicking Edit allows adjusting the main Ubuntu repository source settings which should not be allowed there since it is already possible to do that from the Ubuntu Software tab. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: software-properties-gtk 0.99.44 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-20.20-generic 6.8.1 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-20-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: zfs ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Mar 29 12:10:24 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-06 (723 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Daily amd64 (20220405) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 PATH=(custom, no user) SHELL=/bin/bash TERM=xterm-256color XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= SourcePackage: software-properties UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to noble on 2023-12-09 (111 days ago) ** Affects: software-properties (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug noble wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059797 Title: Other Software shows extra comment for Ubuntu distribution repository To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2059797/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056753] Re: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure
** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056753 Title: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gobject-introspection/+bug/2056753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1858768] Re: sysprof crashed with SIGSEGV
I am closing this issue since it is fixed in Ubuntu 23.10 and newer. ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858768 Title: sysprof crashed with SIGSEGV To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/1858768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2040519] Re: sysprof produces no useful timing data on Ubuntu 23.10
I'm closing this issue since upstream believes it is fixed in 45.2 and later. Please reopen this bug or open a new bug if you still experience this issue with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which has sysprof 46.0. We have focused our limited time on working on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and I doubt sysprof will be updated to a newer version for Ubuntu 23.10. ** Changed in: sysprof (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040519 Title: sysprof produces no useful timing data on Ubuntu 23.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysprof/+bug/2040519/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1559129] Re: Replace defaults.list by mimeapps.list
** Tags removed: block-proposed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559129 Title: Replace defaults.list by mimeapps.list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktop-file-utils/+bug/1559129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055364] Re: Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46 Beta
** Tags removed: block-proposed ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055364 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46 Beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/+bug/2055364/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2028819] Re: File-Roller should depend on 7zip package instead of abandoned p7zip-full since version 43
The p7zip dependency was Debian-only so there is nothing at all to fix on the Ubuntu side. Therefore, I am closing this bug. ** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2028819 Title: File-Roller should depend on 7zip package instead of abandoned p7zip- full since version 43 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2028819/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059335] Re: Update file-roller to 44
** Description changed: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/file-roller/-/blob/44/NEWS + + file-roller 44 was released after Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Feature Freeze. + + Sometimes, we request Feature Freeze Exceptions to get late features in, + but this change looks like it could be a problem for Ubuntu Budgie, + Ubuntu Unity, and Ubuntu Cinnamon which include file-roller by default: + + - Retire AppMenu and remove redundant codes + + file-roller 44 will be in Ubuntu 24.10. ** Changed in: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059335 Title: Update file-roller to 44 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2059335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059335] [NEW] Update file-roller to 44
Public bug reported: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/file-roller/-/blob/44/NEWS ** Affects: file-roller (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Tags: upgrade-software-version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059335 Title: Update file-roller to 44 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/file-roller/+bug/2059335/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059271] Re: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
** Changed in: workrave (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059271] Re: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
** Also affects: workrave (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: workrave (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059271] Re: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
** Description changed: Please remove the following packages from noble to allow GNOME Shell 46 to migrate out of noble-proposed when it's ready. These packages need source changes to be compatible so they can be allowed to auto-sync, but otherwise aren't helpful to have even in noble-proposed: - gnome-shell-pomodoro - - workrave Here is the porting documentation: https://gjs.guide/extensions/upgrading/gnome-shell-46.html + Workave + --- + Workrave is also incompatible but provides other packages so I'm looking into just disabling the workrave-gnome package. + Upstream bug reports https://github.com/gnome-pomodoro/gnome-pomodoro/issues/693 https://github.com/rcaelers/workrave/issues/532 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059271] [NEW] Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46
Public bug reported: Please remove the following packages from noble to allow GNOME Shell 46 to migrate out of noble-proposed when it's ready. These packages need source changes to be compatible so they can be allowed to auto-sync, but otherwise aren't helpful to have even in noble-proposed: - gnome-shell-pomodoro - workrave Here is the porting documentation: https://gjs.guide/extensions/upgrading/gnome-shell-46.html Upstream bug reports https://github.com/gnome-pomodoro/gnome-pomodoro/issues/693 https://github.com/rcaelers/workrave/issues/532 ** Affects: gnome-shell-pomodoro (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: noble update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059271 Title: Please remove GNOME Shell extensions incompatible with GNOME Shell 46 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-pomodoro/+bug/2059271/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058819] Re: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock -dock asymmetrical
I believe this is fixed in the yaru-theme update which is also in the PPA. Could you install all updates and try again? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058819 Title: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock -dock asymmetrical To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/2058819/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058647] Re: GNOME OAuth2 Handler desktop entry not hidden
This is already fixed in noble-proposed. Therefore, I'm closing this bug. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-online- accounts/-/merge_requests/177 ** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058647 Title: GNOME OAuth2 Handler desktop entry not hidden To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2058647/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] Re: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split
** Description changed: As requested by the Ubuntu Release Team, I am providing early notice of - a Feature Freeze Exception I intend to request soon (later this week - hopefully) to split the gnome-software package into separate binary - plugins. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the - parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone - may want to use only the Flatpak part or only the apt/.deb part. + a Feature Freeze Exception I intend to request soon (approximately March + 27) What is Needed Now - - Finish the Salsa merge request to get some review from others. - Evaluate different use case workflows and how well the changes help and any issues that may result + Waiting a few days for review of https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/gnome-software/-/merge_requests/16 Impact -- + I request permission to land a change I am making in Debian to split gnome-software's .deb support into a separate package, gnome-software-plugin-deb, to match the existing -snap and -flatpak packages. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to use only the Flatpak part because they use the Snap Store to manage .debs and Snaps. Or maybe they want a different combination. + + This has been requested by multiple users on Ubuntu Discourse and at + least one Launchpad bug and one Debian bug. Potential Problems --- + For new installs, gnome-software has Depends: gnome-software-plugin-deb | gnome-software-plugin. Where gnome-software-plugin is a virtual package provided by each plugin so a user would get gnome-software-plugin-deb installed unless they specifically chose a different plugin or the metapackage they installed did. + However, I think this won't work right for upgrades. I am going to + investigate whether I can add a ubuntu-release-upgrader quirk to install + gnome-software-plugin-deb for people who already have gnome-software + installed. Maybe I need to treat gnome-software like a metapackage so I + can use PostUpgradeInstall + + Otherwise, people are likely to lose support for installing .debs with + GNOME Software and it is not obvious why. Other Related Changes - - fwupd + I am dropping the fwupd plugin. Ubuntu Desktop includes the firmware-updater snap. Several Ubuntu desktop flavors also include it. For people who don't want snaps, there is also the gnome-firmware app packaged as a .deb. + Because Ubuntu already has update-manager to handle apt update + notifications, I am also dropping the autostart file to reduce + background RAM use. + + A few Ubuntu desktop flavors do not provide any firmware updater app at + all. Ubuntu Budgie developers thought a firmware updater app was too + technical for inclusion in the default Ubuntu 24.04 LTS install. Desktop Flavors Affected GNOME Software is currently included in the default install for only Ubuntu Cinnamon -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
The promotion to main is done. This bug will be automatically closed once gnome-remote-desktop and remmina migrate out of noble-proposed. ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 Title: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004442] Re: [MIR] aom (dependency of libheif)
This bug was fixed in the package aom - 3.8.2-2 Sponsored for Vladimir Petko (vpa1977) --- aom (3.8.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Upload to unstable. * debian/control: Add missing (test-)build-dep pkgconf. [ Vladimir Petko ] * Run package tests at the build time. (See LP bug 2004442) -- Boyuan Yang Wed, 20 Mar 2024 14:41:54 -0400 aom (3.8.2-1) experimental; urgency=medium * Team upload. * New upstream stable release. * debian/patches/backport/*: Drop old backported patches. -- Boyuan Yang Tue, 19 Mar 2024 10:49:16 -0400 ** Changed in: aom (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Released ** Changed in: aom (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: aom (Ubuntu) Assignee: Vladimir Petko (vpa1977) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004442 Title: [MIR] aom (dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aom/+bug/2004442/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056649] Re: Outlook.com does not authenticate anymore with evolution-ews or gnome online accounts
** Changed in: evolution-ews (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** No longer affects: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056649 Title: Outlook.com does not authenticate anymore with evolution-ews or gnome online accounts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evolution-ews/+bug/2056649/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2044420] Re: gtkpod segfaults when attempting to display songs
Please update the bug description to use the SRU Template in order for this to be sponsored for Ubuntu 23.10. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#SRU_Bug_Template Does this fix require a fix for glib in Ubuntu 23.10 first? I am setting this bug to Incomplete and unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please set it back to New and resubscribe ubuntu-sponsors when these items have been dealt with. ** Changed in: gtkpod (Ubuntu) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: gtkpod (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Incomplete ** No longer affects: glib2.0 (Ubuntu Noble) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2044420 Title: gtkpod segfaults when attempting to display songs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/glib/+bug/2044420/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058192] Re: [MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock
Please file a separate bug for sponsoring into multiverse and subscribe ubuntu-sponsors to it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058192 Title: [MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/2058192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2037569] Re: udev issues with mantic beta
The libblockdev fix was included in 3.0.4 which is now in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS ** Changed in: libblockdev (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569 Title: udev issues with mantic beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/2037569/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058136] Re: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package udisks2 - 2.10.1-6 Sponsored for fossfreedom (fossfreedom) --- udisks2 (2.10.1-6) unstable; urgency=medium [ Martin Pitt ] * Don't build with -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions. It breaks module loading, as it confuses GObject's type loading cache: "cannot register existing type 'UDisksDaemon'". Ubuntu enables this linker flag by default, no-op for Debian. (LP: #2040488) [ Michael Biebl ] * Drop python3-distutils Depends from debian/tests/control. No longer needed since 2.10.0. (Closes: #1065991) * Build-depend on pkgconf instead of pkg-config -- Michael Biebl Mon, 11 Mar 2024 23:19:45 +0100 udisks2 (2.10.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * tests: Fix targetcli_config.json. Not all attributes are available anymore in newer kernel versions. -- Michael Biebl Wed, 10 Jan 2024 12:28:58 +0100 udisks2 (2.10.1-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Stop moving files from /usr/sbin to /sbin. With merged-/usr being mandatory, this is no longer necessary. -- Michael Biebl Mon, 27 Nov 2023 05:40:54 +0100 udisks2 (2.10.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Replace udev Build-Depends with systemd-dev. The new systemd-dev package ships udev.pc and systemd.pc which provides the paths for udevdir/systemdsystemunitdir/tmpfilesdir. -- Michael Biebl Mon, 20 Nov 2023 23:51:36 +0100 udisks2 (2.10.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Move systemd services files and udev rules to /usr. Add a corresponding versioned Build-Depends on debhelper (>= 13.11.6) to ensure we have a recent enough dh_installsystemd. -- Michael Biebl Sat, 21 Oct 2023 14:39:24 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058136 Title: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/2058136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058136] Re: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Actually, we believe LP: #2037569 was fixed in libblockdev 3.1.0 instead (which is already in Noble) so we can drop the udisks2 patch. I have synced this for you. Thank you for working on this merge. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058136 Title: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/2058136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058136] Re: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
In the future, could you change the title to "Merge" instead of "Sync". Sync has a specific meaning and it is confusing to sponsors to use that word. Although it is possible to sync first and then apply an Ubuntu diff as a separate upload, it is more common to just do a single upload. I am uploading this for you and am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Please feel free to resubscribe if you have anything else that needs to be sponsored. ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: udisks2 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058136 Title: Sync udisks2 2.10.1-6 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udisks2/+bug/2058136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 Title: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Also affects: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 Title: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054163] Re: Figure out packaging repo details
I overhauled the Ubuntu package to use the Debian orig tarballs since we need to be able to update our vendoring at any time. Therefore, the pristine-tar and debian/* branches are stored at https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/snapshot But the ubuntu/* branches are stored at https://salsa.debian.org/ubuntu-dev-team/snapshot There is also https://salsa.debian.org/ubuntu-dev-team/snapshot/-/blob/ubuntu/latest/debian/README.source The ubuntu/* branches are stored separately because the vendoring takes a very large amount of space compared to the rest of what is stored in the git repo and we want to be polite to the Debian GNOME team. It's possible to reconsider later but this should work for now. ** Changed in: gnome-snapshot (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054163 Title: Figure out packaging repo details To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-snapshot/+bug/2054163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
I opened https://launchpad.net/bugs/2058401 for the test issue and created a Jira card. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 Title: FFe: [MIR] freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058401] [NEW] Enable automated tests
Public bug reported: freerdp's packaging has set -DBUILD_TESTING=OFF We need to try to enable that option to enable either build tests or autopkgtests or both. If it doesn't work in at least one of Ubuntu's build or autopkgtest environments, we should document this. ** Affects: freerdp3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058401 Title: Enable automated tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freerdp3/+bug/2058401/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2052652] Re: [MIR] gnome-snapshot
I uploaded https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- snapshot/46.0-1ubuntu1 It ended up being an overhaul of the packaging to try to meet MIR expectations. This is my subteam's first time with a Rust app so it's understandable that we're still learning. It now uses the same minimal upstream tarball as Debian. And then we specifically run cargo vendor ourselves in the debian/missing-sources/ directory so that we can update the vendored crates at any time. #2 try getting rid of pre-compiled static libraries It looks to me like the only .a files now are in the Windows crates. There was one false positive, an empty .a file for systemdeps but I've removed that from our vendoring with a slight hack in debian/rules to restore it when needed. #3 Improve tracking of vendored Rust dependencies (e.g. using dh_cargo), I at least am now using XS-Vendored-Sources-Rust. This app uses meson as its build system so it's unclear to me where I could inject dh_cargo commands. I can follow up later with Foundations to see if this can be improved but I'm guessing it meets the minimum requirement here. #5 Document how to refresh the vendored dependencies https://salsa.debian.org/ubuntu-dev- team/snapshot/-/blob/ubuntu/latest/debian/README.source #7 Consider implementing autopkgtests, using a simulated video device I don't hav #8 Give clearer guidance on where and how packaging will be hosted (e.g. using Vcs-Git control fields) And how the Ubuntu delta will be handled going forward, see bug #2054163 The Vcs-Git fields are updated and a debian/README.source is provided to document details. #9 consider fixing some of the more relevant lintian warnings: No errors are emited now. Snapshot has no relevant command line options so a manpage doesn't seem helpful. hardening-no-fortify-functions is often a false positive. It is currently classified as "informational" which suggests that Debian isn't confident enough in this tag. Vendoring actually increased the pedantic warnings with several instances of maintainer-manual-page [debian/missing-sources/ package-does-not-install-examples [debian/missing-sources/ and one instance of source: unknown-field Vendored-Sources-Rust Windows --- There isn't an easy way to remove the Windows crates. Possibly the crates could be patched to not require the Windows dependencies, but remember that the crates aren't part of the upstream source here so it would be patching after we run the crate vendor command, which is unusual but might be able to work. Those patches may need to be frequently rebased. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052652 Title: [MIR] gnome-snapshot To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-snapshot/+bug/2052652/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058098] Re: Gpodder doesn't start anymore on Ubuntu 24.04 problem with Python 3.12 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp'
** Changed in: loupe (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058098 Title: Gpodder doesn't start anymore on Ubuntu 24.04 problem with Python 3.12 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'imp' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/loupe/+bug/2058098/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058101] Re: Nautilus Move file dragging with the mouse no longer works
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058101 Title: Nautilus Move file dragging with the mouse no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/2058101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907916] Re: empathy crashed with SIGSEGV in empathy_contact_get_alias()
** Changed in: folks (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907916 Title: empathy crashed with SIGSEGV in empathy_contact_get_alias() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/empathy/+bug/907916/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842 Title: FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] Re: FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Description changed:
Feature Freeze Exception Request
--
There are only 2 packages in Ubuntu main that use freerdp2: remmina and
gnome-remote-desktop. It is requested to switch both to freerdp3. Therefore
only one version of freerdp will be in main. freerdp2 will be demoted to
universe since many universe packages use it and are not prepared to switch to
freerdp3.
- This also requests updating gdm and gnome-control-center to fully enable
- the features of gnome-remote-desktop 46.
+ This also requests updating gnome-control-center to fully enable the
+ features of gnome-remote-desktop 46.
Impact
--
A headline feature of GNOME 46 is support as a Remote Desktop server without
requiring someone to already be logged in locally ("headless" mode). This
feature requires gnome-remote-desktop 46. gnome-remote-desktop 46 requires
freerdp3.
Impact if this does not happen
--
- We would need to patch gnome-control-center to use the older Remote Desktop
panel
- - We would need to keep using gnome-remote-desktop 45 instead of 46. The
gnome-remote-desktop upstream maintainers would be unhappy with this decision.
gnome-remote-desktop 45 was tested against Mutter 45. Changes in Mutter 46 may
require changes in gnome-remote-desktop for things to work well although a
simple test showed that basic remote desktop seems to work ok with the mismatch.
+ - We would need to keep using gnome-remote-desktop 45 instead of 46. The
gnome-remote-desktop upstream maintainers would be unhappy with this decision.
gnome-remote-desktop 45 was tested against Mutter 45. Changes in Mutter 46 may
require changes in gnome-remote-desktop for things to work well although a
simple test showed that basic remote desktop seems to work ok with the
mismatch. (See comment #1 from upstream developer.)
Why this did not land sooner
---
It required the packaging of a new source package freerdp3. And we had to do
this sooner than Debian. Sorry too many things to do before Feature Freeze and
this did not make it.
Affected Packages
-
- gnome-remote-desktop 45 -> 46
- - gdm3 45 -> 46 (to support headless mode)
- gnome-control-center (to update the Remote Desktop settings page)
-
- remmina 1.4.34 -> 1.4.35 and swap build-depends. Remmina 1.4.34 did not
work with freerdp 3.3 in my testing
- gnome-connections (build-dependency swap): Not required by other changes
and not in Main but makes sense to switch it also
Affected Flavors
Only Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu ships gdm3, gnome-control-center,
gnome-remote-desktop. (Cinnamon 23.04 and daily 23.10 also ships
gnome-control-center but this appears to be a bug since they ship
cinnamon-control-center and is likely already fixed in noble-proposed)
Remmina is included in Ubuntu Desktop, Cinnamon, Kylin, and Unity.
gnome-connections has no reverse dependencies or recommends.
Upstream Changes
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
https://gitlab.com/Remmina/Remmina/-/blob/rel/v1.4.35/CHANGELOG.md
-
- https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
gnome-control-center 46~beta was already in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS before Feature
Freeze. It will be updated to 46.0. The relevant part here is whether we use
the 46~beta version of the Remote Desktop page or the 46.0 version.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
Build Logs
--
I have backported GNOME Shell 46 RC and GTK4 4.13 to the Ubuntu Desktop PPA.
The PPA currently has noble-proposed disabled so that it is easily possible to
try this set of packages without dealing with the incomplete 32-bit time
transition in noble-proposed. In addition, the PPA has the affected packages
from this FFe.
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-desktop/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages
Testing Done
---
1. From Ubuntu 23.10 client using Remmina, I was successfully able to connect
to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS host using GNOME Shell 46 RC and GNOME Remote Desktop 46
RC. Remote control worked.
2. From Ubuntu 24.04 LTS client with Remmina 1.4.35 built with freerdp3,
I was able to connect to Ubuntu 23.10 host. Remote control worked.
3. From Ubuntu 24.04 LTS client with GNOME Connections 46 RC built with
freerdp3, I was able to connect to Ubuntu 23.10 host. Remote control
worked.
- None of those above tests tried the new headless mode. This means we
- have tested that existing functionality still works with the changes.
- The remainder of the testing is for the new feature.
-
- Testing To Do
- -
- Build gdm3 & gnome-control-center 46.rc and try the new headless mode
+ 4. I added a new Remote Login test case to
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/TestPlans/RemoteDesktop and verified
+ that remote login worked. Notably, enabling this changes the port for
[Bug 2057842] Re: [DRAFT] FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Description changed:
Feature Freeze Exception Request
--
There are only 2 packages in Ubuntu main that use freerdp2: remmina and
gnome-remote-desktop. It is requested to switch both to freerdp3. Therefore
only one version of freerdp will be in main. freerdp2 will be demoted to
universe since many universe packages use it and are not prepared to switch to
freerdp3.
This also requests updating gdm and gnome-control-center to fully enable
the features of gnome-remote-desktop 46.
Impact
--
A headline feature of GNOME 46 is support as a Remote Desktop server without
requiring someone to already be logged in locally ("headless" mode). This
feature requires gnome-remote-desktop 46. gnome-remote-desktop 46 requires
freerdp3.
Impact if this does not happen
--
- We would need to patch gnome-control-center to use the older Remote Desktop
panel
- We would need to keep using gnome-remote-desktop 45 instead of 46. The
gnome-remote-desktop upstream maintainers would be unhappy with this decision.
gnome-remote-desktop 45 was tested against Mutter 45. Changes in Mutter 46 may
require changes in gnome-remote-desktop for things to work well although a
simple test showed that basic remote desktop seems to work ok with the mismatch.
Why this did not land sooner
---
It required the packaging of a new source package freerdp3. And we had to do
this sooner than Debian. Sorry too many things to do before Feature Freeze and
this did not make it.
Affected Packages
-
- gnome-remote-desktop 45 -> 46
- gdm3 45 -> 46 (to support headless mode)
- gnome-control-center (to update the Remote Desktop settings page)
- - remmina (build-dependency swap)
+ - remmina 1.4.34 -> 1.4.35 and swap build-depends. Remmina 1.4.34 did not
work with freerdp 3.3 in my testing
- gnome-connections (build-dependency swap): Not required by other changes
and not in Main but makes sense to switch it also
Affected Flavors
Only Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu ships gdm3, gnome-control-center,
gnome-remote-desktop. (Cinnamon 23.04 and daily 23.10 also ships
gnome-control-center but this appears to be a bug since they ship
cinnamon-control-center and is likely already fixed in noble-proposed)
Remmina is included in Ubuntu Desktop, Cinnamon, Kylin, and Unity.
gnome-connections has no reverse dependencies or recommends.
+ Upstream changes
+
+ https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
+
+ https://gitlab.com/Remmina/Remmina/-/blob/rel/v1.4.35/CHANGELOG.md
+
+ https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
+
+ gnome-control-center 46~beta was already in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS before Feature
Freeze. It will be updated to 46.0. The relevant part here is whether we use
the 46~beta version of the Remote Desktop page or the 46.0 version.
+ https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-control-center/-/blob/46.rc/NEWS
+
+
Testing Done
---
- TBD
+ 1. From Ubuntu 23.10 client using Remmina, I was successfully able to connect
to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS host using GNOME Shell 46 RC and GNOME Remote Desktop 46
RC. Remote control worked.
+
+ 2. From Ubuntu 24.04 LTS client with Remmina 1.4.35 built with freerdp3,
+ I was able to connect to Ubuntu 23.10 host. Remote control worked.
+
+ 3. From Ubuntu 24.04 LTS client with GNOME Connections 46 RC built with
+ freerdp3, I was able to connect to Ubuntu 23.10 host. Remote control
+ worked.
+
+ None of those above tests tried the new headless mode. This means we
+ have tested that existing functionality still works with the changes.
+ The remainder of the testing is for the new feature.
+
+ Testing To Do
+ -
+ Build gdm3 & gnome-control-center 46.rc and try the new headless mode
** Summary changed:
- [DRAFT] FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
+ FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
** Description changed:
Feature Freeze Exception Request
--
There are only 2 packages in Ubuntu main that use freerdp2: remmina and
gnome-remote-desktop. It is requested to switch both to freerdp3. Therefore
only one version of freerdp will be in main. freerdp2 will be demoted to
universe since many universe packages use it and are not prepared to switch to
freerdp3.
This also requests updating gdm and gnome-control-center to fully enable
the features of gnome-remote-desktop 46.
Impact
--
A headline feature of GNOME 46 is support as a Remote Desktop server without
requiring someone to already be logged in locally ("headless" mode). This
feature requires gnome-remote-desktop 46. gnome-remote-desktop 46 requires
freerdp3.
Impact if this does not happen
--
- We would need to patch gnome-control-center to use the older Remote Desktop
panel
- We would need to keep using gnome-remote-desktop 45 instead of 46. The
[Bug 2056657] Re: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056657 Title: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-tweaks/+bug/2056657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057842] [NEW] [DRAFT] FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
Public bug reported:
Feature Freeze Exception Request
--
There are only 2 packages in Ubuntu main that use freerdp2: remmina and
gnome-remote-desktop. It is requested to switch both to freerdp3. Therefore
only one version of freerdp will be in main. freerdp2 will be demoted to
universe since many universe packages use it and are not prepared to switch to
freerdp3.
This also requests updating gdm and gnome-control-center to fully enable
the features of gnome-remote-desktop 46.
Impact
--
A headline feature of GNOME 46 is support as a Remote Desktop server without
requiring someone to already be logged in locally ("headless" mode). This
feature requires gnome-remote-desktop 46. gnome-remote-desktop 46 requires
freerdp3.
Impact if this does not happen
--
- We would need to patch gnome-control-center to use the older Remote Desktop
panel
- We would need to keep using gnome-remote-desktop 45 instead of 46. The
gnome-remote-desktop upstream maintainers would be unhappy with this decision.
gnome-remote-desktop 45 was tested against Mutter 45. Changes in Mutter 46 may
require changes in gnome-remote-desktop for things to work well although a
simple test showed that basic remote desktop seems to work ok with the mismatch.
Why this did not land sooner
---
It required the packaging of a new source package freerdp3. And we had to do
this sooner than Debian. Sorry too many things to do before Feature Freeze and
this did not make it.
Affected Packages
-
- gnome-remote-desktop 45 -> 46
- gdm3 45 -> 46 (to support headless mode)
- gnome-control-center (to update the Remote Desktop settings page)
- remmina (build-dependency swap)
- gnome-connections (build-dependency swap): Not required by other changes and
not in Main but makes sense to switch it also
Affected Flavors
Only Ubuntu Desktop and Edubuntu ships gdm3, gnome-control-center,
gnome-remote-desktop. (Cinnamon 23.04 and daily 23.10 also ships
gnome-control-center but this appears to be a bug since they ship
cinnamon-control-center and is likely already fixed in noble-proposed)
Remmina is included in Ubuntu Desktop, Cinnamon, Kylin, and Unity.
gnome-connections has no reverse dependencies or recommends.
Testing Done
---
TBD
** Affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Affects: remmina (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Incomplete
** Tags: noble update-excuse
** Also affects: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: remmina (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: gnome-remote-desktop (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057842
Title:
[DRAFT] FFe: freedp2 -> freerdp3 in main
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-remote-desktop/+bug/2057842/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057836] Re: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures
The issue appears to be a pygobject bug so I've forwarded the issue there now. ** Changed in: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: pygobject (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pygobject/+bug/2057836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2057836] [NEW] gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures
Public bug reported: gst-python1.0 fails to build because of test failures. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-python1.0/1.22.10-1build1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-python1.0/1.24.0-1 I have reported the issue to the upstream developers https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/issues/3353 ** Affects: pygobject Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: gst-python1.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: gst-python1.0 (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1065547 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065547 ** Also affects: gst-python1.0 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065547 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: gst-python1.0 fails to build because of test failures. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-python1.0/1.22.10-1build1 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-python1.0/1.24.0-1 I have reported the issue to the upstream developers + + https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer/-/issues/3353 ** Also affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pygobject/-/issues #624 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pygobject/-/issues/624 ** Also affects: pygobject via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pygobject/-/issues/624 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057836 Title: gst-python1.0 fails to build: test failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/pygobject/+bug/2057836/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1833322] Re: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD)
David, please open a new bug against ubuntu-meta about that issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322 Title: Please consider no more having irqbalance enabled by default (per image/use-case/TBD) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-images/+bug/1833322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924 Title: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056753] Re: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure
** No longer affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056753 Title: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gobject-introspection/+bug/2056753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056767] [NEW] DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split
Public bug reported: As requested by the Ubuntu Release Team, I am providing early notice of a Feature Freeze Exception I intend to request soon (later this week hopefully) to split the gnome-software package into separate binary plugins. This will allow users and flavors to specifically opt into the parts of the GNOME Software experience they want. For instance, someone may want to use only the Flatpak part or only the apt/.deb part. What is Needed Now - Finish the Salsa merge request to get some review from others. Evaluate different use case workflows and how well the changes help and any issues that may result Impact -- Potential Problems --- Other Related Changes - fwupd Desktop Flavors Affected GNOME Software is currently included in the default install for only Ubuntu Cinnamon ** Affects: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Changed in: gnome-software (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056767 Title: DRAFT [FFe] gnome-software package split To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/2056767/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056753] Re: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure
** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues #494 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/494 ** Also affects: gobject-introspection via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/-/issues/494 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gobject-introspection (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066032 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066032 ** Also affects: gobject-introspection (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066032 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056753 Title: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gobject-introspection/+bug/2056753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056657] Re: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-tweaks/-/issues #470 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-tweaks/-/issues/470 ** Also affects: gnome-tweaks via https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-tweaks/-/issues/470 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056657 Title: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-tweaks/+bug/2056657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056753] Re: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056753 Title: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygobject/+bug/2056753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056753] [NEW] pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure
Public bug reported: pygobject fails to build on armhf, the only Ubuntu 32-bit architecture that has done the time_t transition. test_gi.py runs a time_t test that I believe is using functions in glib2.0 Test log excerpt tests/test_gi.py ... [ 21%] . --- stderr --- Fatal Python error: Aborted Current thread 0xf785e020 (most recent call first): File "/<>/tests/test_gi.py", line 579 in test_time_t_in File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 589 in _callTestMethod File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 634 in run File "/usr/lib/python3.12/unittest/case.py", line 690 in __call__ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/unittest.py", line 338 in runtest File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 170 in pytest_runtest_call File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 102 in _multicall File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 119 in _hookexec File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 501 in __call__ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 263 in File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 342 in from_call File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 262 in call_runtest_hook File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 223 in call_and_report File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 134 in runtestprotocol File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/runner.py", line 115 in pytest_runtest_protocol File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 102 in _multicall File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 119 in _hookexec File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 501 in __call__ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/main.py", line 352 in pytest_runtestloop File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 102 in _multicall File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 119 in _hookexec File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 501 in __call__ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/main.py", line 327 in _main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/main.py", line 273 in wrap_session File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/main.py", line 320 in pytest_cmdline_main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_callers.py", line 102 in _multicall File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_manager.py", line 119 in _hookexec File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pluggy/_hooks.py", line 501 in __call__ File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py", line 175 in main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py", line 198 in console_main File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pytest/__main__.py", line 7 in File "", line 88 in _run_code File "", line 198 in _run_module_as_main Full build log == https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygobject/3.47.0-3build1/+latestbuild/armhf ** Affects: pygobject (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: ftbfs noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056753 Title: pygobject FTBFS on armhf: time_t build test failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pygobject/+bug/2056753/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056657] Re: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
As a workaround to be able to start the Tweaks app, you can edit the telegram autostart desktop file and add an Icon line like this. It doesn't matter that the icon file probably doesn't even exist. Icon=telegram The Firefox .desktop file doesn't matter for this issue. ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056657 Title: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-tweaks/+bug/2056657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056657] Re: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
It sounds like you have a .desktop file in your ~/.config/autostart/ that does not have an icon associated. (That is a hidden folder). Are you willing to post that file? A copy might also be in ~/.local/share/applications/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056657 Title: gnome-tweaks crashed with TypeError in __init__(): Gtk.Image.new_from_icon_name() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-tweaks/+bug/2056657/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056640] [NEW] Please remove gudev-sharp-3.0
Public bug reported: gudev-sharp-3.0 was only ever in Debian Experimental, but it has now been removed from Debian Experimental. Therefore, please remove it from Ubuntu. ** Affects: gudev-sharp-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gudev-sharp-3.0 (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: noble ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1051050 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051050 ** Also affects: gudev-sharp-3.0 (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051050 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056640 Title: Please remove gudev-sharp-3.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gudev-sharp-3.0/+bug/2056640/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056565] Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage
I still think it is ok to create the new metapackage now for universe. There are a lot of desktop flavors that do install from universe and you could manually add the recommends to one of those flavors if you want and if the flavor leads are ok with it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565 Title: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2056565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056565] Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage
> After the ubuntu-meta change lands, linux-meta* will Recommend ubuntu- kernel-accessories, which will cause bpftrace and bpfcc to be pulled into the relevant images as desired. I think our "main" images do not build from universe. Further, anybody that installs from those images won't get the recommended packages even after they are promoted to main. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565 Title: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2056565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056565] Re: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage
Or once a new linux* is built, apt would install the recommends then?? I'm not sure on that detail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056565 Title: [FFe] [needs-packaging] ubuntu-kernel-accessories seed and metapackage To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2056565/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1955748] Re: Gnome Tweaks window won't maximize
** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955748 Title: Gnome Tweaks window won't maximize To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-tweaks/+bug/1955748/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1973341] Re: Gnome tweaks doesn't change wallpaper when desktop in dark mode
This will be fixed in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS available later this year by providing a "dark" background chooser also. ** Changed in: gnome-tweaks (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1973341 Title: Gnome tweaks doesn't change wallpaper when desktop in dark mode To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-tweaks/+bug/1973341/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055519] Re: Mutter rebuilds on jammy fail test: mutter:cogl+cogl/conform / framebuffer-get-bits (due to Mesa >= 23.1.1)
Thank you. I have uploaded this to the jammy queue so I am unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors. Feel free to resubscribe if you have something else that needs to be sponsored. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055519 Title: Mutter rebuilds on jammy fail test: mutter:cogl+cogl/conform / framebuffer-get-bits (due to Mesa >= 23.1.1) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/mutter/+bug/2055519/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055461] Re: unity-control-center fails to build with gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2
** Changed in: unity-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055461 Title: unity-control-center fails to build with gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/2055461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045493] Re: unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???()
I uploaded a fix for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS but I don't have capacity to work on this for Ubuntu 23.10. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Summary changed: - unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???() + unity-control-center Keyboard page crashes because of missing toggle-shaded gsettings schema -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045493 Title: unity-control-center Keyboard page crashes because of missing toggle- shaded gsettings schema To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/2045493/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045493] Re: unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???()
That file is shipped by compiz-gnome, not unity-control-center ** Package changed: unity-control-center (Ubuntu) => compiz (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045493 Title: unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/2045493/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2045493] Re: unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???()
But toggle-shaded was dropped in gsettings-desktop-schemas 45 which was included in Ubuntu 23.10 ! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045493 Title: unity-control-center crashed with signal 5 in ???() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/2045493/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1881180] Re: drop suru-icon-theme (and use UBports' suru-icon-theme as upstream)
I dropped suru-icon-theme from the ubuntu-themes source today and synced Debian's version of suru-icon-theme. ** Changed in: ubuntu-themes (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1881180 Title: drop suru-icon-theme (and use UBports' suru-icon-theme as upstream) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-themes/+bug/1881180/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2039235] Re: gnome-online-accounts -> when signing into google account, infinite loading after entering password
I am closing this issue because it is fixed in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS which is expected to be released later in April. It was fixed by switching gnome- online-accounts to always use your browser for log in instead of an embedded webkit powered popup window. That kind of change is probably too large to try to backport to Ubuntu 23.10 and our developer time is focused now on getting Ubuntu 24.04 LTS ready. ** Changed in: gnome-online-accounts (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039235 Title: gnome-online-accounts -> when signing into google account, infinite loading after entering password To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-online-accounts/+bug/2039235/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2056209] Re: Incorrect Info In About Section
In Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, the "GNOME" version comes from the version of gnome-desktop3, not the version of gnome-shell. At this point, we are very unlikely to update gnome-desktop3 for that minor issue. Similarly, we aren't going to update a 4 year old Ubuntu release to adjust how RAM is reported in gnome-control-center. The difference you noticed might be seen if your system has integrated graphics (like with Intel) and some of the RAM is used by the graphics card. I am closing this bug since there is no action we will take here and the issues are minor. If you still experience this or similar issues on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS or the development version of Ubuntu, please open a new bug. Also, please open one bug per issue. You mentioned multiple issues in this bug. ** Changed in: gnome-control-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056209 Title: Incorrect Info In About Section To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/2056209/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055779] Re: software and updates not opening
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2053228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2053228 software-properties-gtk does not start -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055779 Title: software and updates not opening To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/2055779/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055783] Re: "Unnamed" actions on Rhythmbox's icon right-click menu
** No longer affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: rhythmbox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055783 Title: "Unnamed" actions on Rhythmbox's icon right-click menu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/2055783/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1559129] Re: Replace defaults.list by mimeapps.list
I'm setting block-proposed because I want this to roughly land in Noble at the same time as the gnome-session update. ** Tags added: block-proposed ** Also affects: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: desktop-file-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: gnome-session (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1559129 Title: Replace defaults.list by mimeapps.list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/desktop-file-utils/+bug/1559129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055470] Re: Drop Online Accounts feature
** Description changed: Please build cinnamon-control-center with -Donlineaccounts=false gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2 has been ported from GTK3 to GTK4 and cinnamon-control-center's Online Accounts feature no longer works correctly with the new version. It is impractical to keep using gnome-online-accounts. budgie-control-center has already been updated to drop the Online Accounts feature. More background at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/gnome-online-accounts-no-longer-compatible-with-budgie-cinnamon-unity-control-center/42898 + + I also reported this upstream at + https://github.com/linuxmint/cinnamon-control-center/issues/326 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055470 Title: Drop Online Accounts feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon-control-center/+bug/2055470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055470] [NEW] Drop Online Accounts feature
Public bug reported: Please build cinnamon-control-center with -Donlineaccounts=false gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2 has been ported from GTK3 to GTK4 and cinnamon-control-center's Online Accounts feature no longer works correctly with the new version. It is impractical to keep using gnome-online-accounts. budgie-control-center has already been updated to drop the Online Accounts feature. More background at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/gnome-online-accounts-no-longer-compatible-with-budgie-cinnamon-unity-control-center/42898 ** Affects: cinnamon-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Affects: cinnamon-control-center (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: noble update-excuse ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1065114 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065114 ** Also affects: cinnamon-control-center (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065114 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055470 Title: Drop Online Accounts feature To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon-control-center/+bug/2055470/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055461] [NEW] unity-control-center fails to build with gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2
Public bug reported: unity-control-center will fail to build with gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2 which I am uploading to Ubuntu 24.04 LTS today. https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/gnome-online-accounts-no-longer- compatible-with-budgie-cinnamon-unity-control-center/42898 ** Affects: unity-control-center (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: ftbfs noble update-excuse ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055461 Title: unity-control-center fails to build with gnome-online-accounts 3.49.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-control-center/+bug/2055461/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1825710] Re: Remove "Application is ready" notification
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: focal mantic rls-ff-notfixing ** Tags added: fixed-in-gnome-shell-46 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825710 Title: Remove "Application is ready" notification To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1825710/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055364] [NEW] Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46 Beta
Public bug reported: I don't want a hard dependency on gnome-shell 46 Beta, but there might be bugs if used with GNOME Shell 45 ** Affects: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Committed ** Tags: block-proposed noble upgrade-software-version ** Changed in: xdg-desktop-portal-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055364 Title: Update xdg-desktop-portal-gnome to 46 Beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdg-desktop-portal-gnome/+bug/2055364/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15
** Changed in: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924 Title: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958003] Re: Upgrade anki to version 2.1.26 or higher
** Tags added: noble upgrade-software-version ** Changed in: anki (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958003 Title: Upgrade anki to version 2.1.26 or higher To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anki/+bug/1958003/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051397] Re: There is a newer version
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1958003 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958003 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1958003 Upgrade anki to version 2.1.26 or higher -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051397 Title: There is a newer version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/anki/+bug/2051397/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1977614] Re: [MIR] fdk-aac-free
Mark and Jorge, I reached out to Fedora to ask them to update but I don't expect action will happen soon enough for our needs. The Ubuntu Desktop team can likely rebase fdk-aac-free to 2.0.3 but we don't have time to do it this week. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977614 Title: [MIR] fdk-aac-free To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fdk-aac-free/+bug/1977614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051579] Re: [MIR] jpeg-xl
Closing since there really isn't anything here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051579 Title: [MIR] jpeg-xl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2051579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051579] Re: [MIR] jpeg-xl
I do not believe this is feasible for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS. The Ubuntu and Debian packages are out of date. I'm also unassigning myself since I am not actively working on this MIR this cycle. ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: jpeg-xl (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051579 Title: [MIR] jpeg-xl To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jpeg-xl/+bug/2051579/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055165] [NEW] Move gcr4 to main
Public bug reported: gcr4 is a new version of the gcr library. The older version 3 library included GTK3 widgets. Since it's not possible to have GTK3 & GTK4 in the same process, a new version was needed. gcr doesn't include GUI widgets so no GTK4 dependency. I have postponed getting gcr into Ubuntu main for a while by reverting commits in various projects. But the latest version of gnome-online- accounts (3.49.2 on the way to 3.50 to be included in GNOME 46) has a hard dependency on gcr4. Just like we allowed GTK4 (and related libraries) into main although technically duplicating GTK3, I request that we allow gcr4 into main even though we need to keep the old gcr in main too for now. Here is a list of affected packages: Ready for switch now - gnome-control-center gnome-online-accounts gnome-settings-daemon gnome-shell gvfs libgdata (not merged upstream but Fedora is shipping the patch) libnma Not ready - gnome-keyring (work started at https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-keyring/-/issues/139) pinentry seahorse (done in nielsdg/gtk4 branch) shotwell (done in a wip/gtk4 branch) Seahorse and shotwell are no longer in Ubuntu Desktop's default install but are in the "full" install option. Already switched (universe) --- epiphany-browser ** Affects: gcr4 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055165 Title: Move gcr4 to main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcr4/+bug/2055165/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2055138] Re: Sync python-ldap 3.4.4-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package python-ldap - 3.4.4-1 Sponsored for Paul Mars (upils) --- python-ldap (3.4.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream version 3.4.4 * Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2. * Update year in d/copyright. -- Michael Fladischer Sun, 03 Dec 2023 10:34:54 + ** Changed in: python-ldap (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055138 Title: Sync python-ldap 3.4.4-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-ldap/+bug/2055138/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053207] Re: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13
** Changed in: glib2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053207 Title: glib requires gobject-introspection >= 1.78.1-13 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glib2.0/+bug/2053207/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051254] Re: Please remove virtaal from Ubuntu
I am closing this issue. This package has been removed from Debian so it will be semi-automatically removed from Ubuntu soon. ** Changed in: virtaal (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051254 Title: Please remove virtaal from Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtaal/+bug/2051254/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix
** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info - gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. + gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu 24.04 LTS that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15
** Also affects: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: fonts-noto-color-emoji (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924 Title: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054924] Re: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15
** Summary changed: - color emoji is broken with fontconfig 2.15 + color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924 Title: color emoji are broken with fontconfig 2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054924] [NEW] color emoji is broken with fontconfig 2.15
Public bug reported: The Noto Color Emoji font is no longer used to show emoji. Many emoji no longer show and the few that do are not in color. ** Affects: fontconfig Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: fontconfig (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Affects: fontconfig (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: noble ** Bug watch added: gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues #400 https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues/400 ** Also affects: fontconfig via https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/fontconfig/fontconfig/-/issues/400 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1064267 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064267 ** Also affects: fontconfig (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1064267 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054924 Title: color emoji is broken with fontconfig 2.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/fontconfig/+bug/2054924/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix
** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. - Notably, gnupg has - Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 2.4.4-2ubuntu7) - - I don't recall ever seeing strict versioned Suggests before so it's my - wild guess that apt does not strict handle versioned Suggests in the - expected way. - - As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests. - - But the true fix may be in apt. - I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. ** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 - munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is now unexpectedly being installed. + munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054908] Re: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix
Ok, pulling in postfix is very disruptive since gpg-wks-client was seeded in Ubuntu Desktop 22.04 LTS and 23.10 and several flavors. postfix's install has a debconf prompt which is now allowed for the default desktop install. ** Summary changed: - gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in postfix + gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gpg-wks-server pulls in postfix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/auto-package-testing/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054908] [NEW] gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in postfix
Public bug reported: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. Notably, gnupg has Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 2.4.4-2ubuntu7) I don't recall ever seeing strict versioned Suggests before so it's my wild guess that apt does not strict handle versioned Suggests in the expected way. As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests. But the true fix may be in apt. I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: gnupg2 (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: New ** Affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Triaged ** Tags: noble update-excuse ** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Also affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: munin (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Tags added: update-excuse ** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. Notably, gnupg has Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 2.4.4-2ubuntu7) I don't recall ever seeing versioned Suggests before so it's my wild - guess that maybe apt does not handle versioned Suggests in the expected - way. + guess that apt does not handle versioned Suggests in the expected way. - As a workaround, try dropping the versions from the Suggests. + As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests. - But the ultimate fix may be in apt. + But the true fix may be in apt. + + I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the + autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. ** Description changed: Example 1 I did a sudo apt dist-upgrade today on my developer machine running Ubuntu Desktop 24.04 LTS and it surprisingly pulled in postfix. I did not built this into a full reproducible test case because I found another test case… Example 2 munin's autopkgtests are now failing because postfix and gpg-wks-server is now unexpectedly being installed. https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/munin/noble/amd64 Other Info gnupg2's changelog indicates that there was an attempt to avoid this misbehavior by having gnupg only Suggest gpg-wks-server. In fact, there is **nothing** in Ubuntu that Depends or Recommends gpg-wks-server. Notably, gnupg has Suggests: gpg-wks-server (<< 2.4.4-2ubuntu7.1~), gpg-wks-server (>= 2.4.4-2ubuntu7) - I don't recall ever seeing versioned Suggests before so it's my wild - guess that apt does not handle versioned Suggests in the expected way. + I don't recall ever seeing strict versioned Suggests before so it's my + wild guess that apt does not strict handle versioned Suggests in the + expected way. As a workaround, try dropping the versions from gnupg's Suggests. But the true fix may be in apt. I added a munin bug task as a pointer in case anyone wonder's about the autopkgtest regression but I don't believe munin needs any changes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054908 Title: gnupg is pulling in gpg-wks-server which pulls in postfix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/2054908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
