[Bug 704687] [NEW] stompserver init script does not source /etc/default/stompserver for STARTTIME
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: stompserver The stompserver init script (at least in 10.04) can use the STARTTIME variable as a delay after starting before testing if stomp is started. I discovered sporadic failures from the init script and found that setting STARTTIME fixed it. Only problem is I'd like to really avoid pushing out new init scripts to systems, much nicer to use a defaults file like most other services in Debian-land. Also, this thing has tons of spaces at line endings, even ones that should be \$, thus that escape of the new line just won't work. ** Affects: stompserver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/704687 Title: stompserver init script does not source /etc/default/stompserver for STARTTIME -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Awesome, I thought I had fixed it previously but have noticed it's still happening and causing some failed puppet runs. -- [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Awesome, I thought I had fixed it previously but have noticed it's still happening and causing some failed puppet runs. -- [SRU] client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Just to chime in, this is affecting my 10.04 LTS nodes talking to my recently upgraded 10.04 LTS puppet master. Puppet sits behind Apache with mod_proxy_balancer and mod_ssl. I disabled reqtimeout and have yet to see this re-appear. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 589611] Re: client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23)
Just to chime in, this is affecting my 10.04 LTS nodes talking to my recently upgraded 10.04 LTS puppet master. Puppet sits behind Apache with mod_proxy_balancer and mod_ssl. I disabled reqtimeout and have yet to see this re-appear. -- client sent HTTP/1.1 request without hostname (see RFC2616 section 14.23) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589611 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 610152] [NEW] collectd failing to dispatch to 'write' with 10.04 clients sending through the network plugin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: collectd Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 collectd: Installed: 4.8.2-1 Candidate: 4.8.2-1 Version table: *** 4.8.2-1 0 500 http://aptproxy/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I expect that collectd on new 10.04 nodes will send the statistics to the master collectd server without issue, just as it did with 8.04 LTS nodes. Instead, there are tons of errors like this on the main collectd server: 14101: #-#-#T#:#:#.#-#:# syslog collectd[#]: Filter subsystem: Built-in target `write': Dispatching value to all write plugins failed with status -#. That number (14101) is how many of these errors are reported *in one day*. On the nodes causing this (I Know the 10.04 clients cause it because the errors stop when I stop collectd on the nodes) I get hundreds of errors similar to this: 36: #-#-#T#:#:#.#-#:# syslog collectd[#]: uc_update: Value too old: name = puppet/interface/if_errors-eth#; value time = #; last cache update = #; I want to make clear that 8.04 nodes work fine sending to this box. There are no errors reported in that case. It's only when 10.04 nodes send to it. ** Affects: collectd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- collectd failing to dispatch to 'write' with 10.04 clients sending through the network plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/610152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last week right? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck, you're thinking this is that Debian bug that had an advisory last week right? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: @Joe, have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested? Thanks chuck Hey Chuck, yea to the extreme I think it's at maybe 1 or 100 for MaxRequestsPerChild, but it seems to resemble the old bug on the surface. Either way it's quieted down for me, thanks for your attention to the issue. -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer Silent Penguin Services AIM: YoosingYoonickz IRC: joe-mac on freenode www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: @Joe, have you tried the configuratoin change as suggested? Thanks chuck Hey Chuck, yea to the extreme I think it's at maybe 1 or 100 for MaxRequestsPerChild, but it seems to resemble the old bug on the surface. Either way it's quieted down for me, thanks for your attention to the issue. -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer Silent Penguin Services AIM: YoosingYoonickz IRC: joe-mac on freenode www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271500] Re: puppetmasterd and puppetd on the same box causing problems
I stopped seeing that problem roughly a year ago, shortly after this. The package seemed to be pretty rough around the edges at the time. -- puppetmasterd and puppetd on the same box causing problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: @Joe: Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this again after karmic has been released. Regards chuck Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: @Joe: Its marked Low so our qa scripts pick it up. Ill take a look at this again after karmic has been released. Regards chuck Ah, ok, cool. Thanks Chuck. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone? -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck Short wrote: ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low Chuck, was wondering, should this be marked Low from Undecided if it hasn't been confirmed nor denied by anyone? -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll probably help workaround momentarily. Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I recall messing with it when I first started seeing this problem, but had removed the configuration options since it didn't seem to help much. I would just like to see some other pair of eyes confirm that a default install with SSL still leaks. This is apparent because when I run the same tests against the HTTP only port things look normal. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Stefan, thanks for re-iterating the MaxRequestsPerChild tidbit, I had forgotten that option was for lifetime, not concurrency. That'll probably help workaround momentarily. Also, I am not currently doing any tweaking wrt the SSLSessionCache, I recall messing with it when I first started seeing this problem, but had removed the configuration options since it didn't seem to help much. I would just like to see some other pair of eyes confirm that a default install with SSL still leaks. This is apparent because when I run the same tests against the HTTP only port things look normal. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Hi Stefan, thanks for the response. My responses are in-line. Is the parameter -f TLS1 necessary to reproduce the problem? No, same behavior. Long-running children just never free up the memory as long as I am hitting the SSL port, seemingly regardless if I pass an algorithm to AB or not. I see radically different (as in this time, normal) behavior if I hit the non-SSL port. Is the URL / of your webserver a php page? If yes, why is the content length of the page 0, what does the php script do? If not php, what is it? A simple redirect? It is the index.php for the CodeIgniter framework, the redirect is somewhat contrived, as it's handled by some internal CodeIgniter stuff that I am not very familiar with. I don't think PHP is involved at all in the leak, since the non-HTTPS port works fine. A workaround may be to add MaxRequestsPerChild 1000 (or an even lower value) to your configuration. That wouldn't really help since long-running children just hold onto memory no matter what it seems. I feel like this issue would be huge and brought up by someone else by now if it's an actual regression. Does the package information I put in the beginning look right? -- Joe McDonagh Operations Engineer www.colonfail.com -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
This took down a box today, had to visit the DC for it... is there any more information-gathering I can do for you or myself here? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from incomplete? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Chuck, is there anything else you need from me to promote this from incomplete? -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is: ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/ At ten seconds: 30253 www-data 20 0 254m 75m 4432 S 31 0.5 0:03.50 apache2 30252 www-data 20 0 251m 72m 4464 S 30 0.4 0:03.34 apache2 30250 www-data 20 0 250m 70m 4420 S 29 0.4 0:03.26 apache2 30251 www-data 20 0 250m 70m 4448 S 29 0.4 0:03.28 apache2 30249 www-data 20 0 249m 70m S 28 0.4 0:03.20 apache2 30331 www-data 20 0 244m 65m 4404 R 30 0.4 0:02.96 apache2 30369 www-data 20 0 233m 53m 4432 R 24 0.3 0:02.36 apache2 30410 www-data 20 0 231m 51m 4348 S 22 0.3 0:02.18 apache2 30458 www-data 20 0 224m 45m 4372 S 19 0.3 0:01.86 apache2 30506 www-data 20 0 217m 38m 4324 R 15 0.2 0:01.50 apache2 30557 www-data 20 0 212m 32m 4356 R 12 0.2 0:01.20 apache2 30620 www-data 20 0 207m 27m 4356 S9 0.2 0:00.92 apache2 This is a significant jump in memory allocation, and children get spawned. I expect the children per my configuration, but the memory use is obscene. At three minutes (stopped ab at this point) 30253 www-data 20 0 366m 187m 4636 S3 1.2 0:09.52 apache2 30252 www-data 20 0 364m 185m 4656 S3 1.2 0:09.46 apache2 30251 www-data 20 0 363m 184m 4668 S3 1.1 0:09.40 apache2 30250 www-data 20 0 361m 182m 4632 S3 1.1 0:09.30 apache2 30249 www-data 20 0 359m 179m 4676 S3 1.1 0:09.14 apache2 30331 www-data 20 0 355m 176m 4668 S3 1.1 0:08.94 apache2 30369 www-data 20 0 343m 164m 4636 S3 1.0 0:08.34 apache2 30410 www-data 20 0 343m 163m 4628 S3 1.0 0:08.26 apache2 30458 www-data 20 0 337m 158m 4684 S3 1.0 0:07.96 apache2 30557 www-data 20 0 320m 141m 4608 R3 0.9 0:07.08 apache2 30620 www-data 20 0 320m 140m 4676 S3 0.9 0:07.06 apache2 30675 www-data 20 0 315m 135m 4620 S3 0.8 0:06.74 apache2 30731 www-data 20 0 311m 131m 4624 S3 0.8 0:06.54 apache2 30841 www-data 20 0 300m 121m 4656 S3 0.8 0:05.96 apache2 30901 www-data 20 0 295m 116m 4608 S3 0.7 0:05.70 apache2 30957 www-data 20 0 294m 114m 4624 S3 0.7 0:05.62 apache2 Now ab is not running, but my stopwatch program is. Now at 5 minutes: 30458 www-data 20 0 341m 162m 4692 S0 1.0 0:08.16 apache2 31126 www-data 20 0 290m 111m 4596 S0 0.7 0:05.42 apache2 31112 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.30 apache2 31210 www-data 20 0 287m 108m 4612 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31257 www-data 20 0 287m 107m 4600 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31222 www-data 20 0 286m 107m 4636 S0 0.7 0:05.20 apache2 31410 www-data 20 0 285m 105m 4588 S0 0.7 0:05.10 apache2 31412 www-data 20 0 284m 105m 4656 S0 0.7 0:05.12 apache2 31396 www-data 20 0 284m 105m 4632 S0 0.7 0:05.12 apache2 Note that although some threads do disappear (normal, expect) the ones that stay never free up any RAM. If I were to let this just chill by itself for a few days, res would be a gig or so and virt would be up there. And for good measure, ten minutes: 30458 www-data 20 0 341m 162m 4692 S0 1.0 0:08.22 apache2 31126 www-data 20 0 291m 111m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.48 apache2 31112 www-data 20 0 290m 110m 4620 S0 0.7 0:05.42 apache2 31222 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4652 S0 0.7 0:05.34 apache2 31210 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4616 S0 0.7 0:05.36 apache2 31257 www-data 20 0 287m 108m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.30 apache2 31410 www-data 20 0 286m 107m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.22 apache2 31396 www-data 20 0 286m 106m 4636 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31384 www-data 20 0 286m 106m 4616 S0 0.7 0:05.22 apache2 31412 www-data 20 0 285m 106m 4660 S0 0.7 0:05.18 apache2 The server isn't being used much right now, but as you can see, no memory has really been free'd. Right now I am working around this by reloading apache at 11:59 every night (the saddest cron job on earth), which appears to bring memory usage back down. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
[Bug 420842] Re: Huge memory leak in Rhythmbox
I can't be the only person seeing this bug: 28015 jmcdonag 20 0 42.3g 1.2g 16m S4 32.5 14:28.80 rhythmbox I just watched it ask for approximately 100 MB per every two seconds... All I have to do is let rhythmbox stay open for a while. Is there some way I can run it in debug mode and give you more information? -- Huge memory leak in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Hey Chuck, thanks for the response. The command is: ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://webserver/ At ten seconds: 30253 www-data 20 0 254m 75m 4432 S 31 0.5 0:03.50 apache2 30252 www-data 20 0 251m 72m 4464 S 30 0.4 0:03.34 apache2 30250 www-data 20 0 250m 70m 4420 S 29 0.4 0:03.26 apache2 30251 www-data 20 0 250m 70m 4448 S 29 0.4 0:03.28 apache2 30249 www-data 20 0 249m 70m S 28 0.4 0:03.20 apache2 30331 www-data 20 0 244m 65m 4404 R 30 0.4 0:02.96 apache2 30369 www-data 20 0 233m 53m 4432 R 24 0.3 0:02.36 apache2 30410 www-data 20 0 231m 51m 4348 S 22 0.3 0:02.18 apache2 30458 www-data 20 0 224m 45m 4372 S 19 0.3 0:01.86 apache2 30506 www-data 20 0 217m 38m 4324 R 15 0.2 0:01.50 apache2 30557 www-data 20 0 212m 32m 4356 R 12 0.2 0:01.20 apache2 30620 www-data 20 0 207m 27m 4356 S9 0.2 0:00.92 apache2 This is a significant jump in memory allocation, and children get spawned. I expect the children per my configuration, but the memory use is obscene. At three minutes (stopped ab at this point) 30253 www-data 20 0 366m 187m 4636 S3 1.2 0:09.52 apache2 30252 www-data 20 0 364m 185m 4656 S3 1.2 0:09.46 apache2 30251 www-data 20 0 363m 184m 4668 S3 1.1 0:09.40 apache2 30250 www-data 20 0 361m 182m 4632 S3 1.1 0:09.30 apache2 30249 www-data 20 0 359m 179m 4676 S3 1.1 0:09.14 apache2 30331 www-data 20 0 355m 176m 4668 S3 1.1 0:08.94 apache2 30369 www-data 20 0 343m 164m 4636 S3 1.0 0:08.34 apache2 30410 www-data 20 0 343m 163m 4628 S3 1.0 0:08.26 apache2 30458 www-data 20 0 337m 158m 4684 S3 1.0 0:07.96 apache2 30557 www-data 20 0 320m 141m 4608 R3 0.9 0:07.08 apache2 30620 www-data 20 0 320m 140m 4676 S3 0.9 0:07.06 apache2 30675 www-data 20 0 315m 135m 4620 S3 0.8 0:06.74 apache2 30731 www-data 20 0 311m 131m 4624 S3 0.8 0:06.54 apache2 30841 www-data 20 0 300m 121m 4656 S3 0.8 0:05.96 apache2 30901 www-data 20 0 295m 116m 4608 S3 0.7 0:05.70 apache2 30957 www-data 20 0 294m 114m 4624 S3 0.7 0:05.62 apache2 Now ab is not running, but my stopwatch program is. Now at 5 minutes: 30458 www-data 20 0 341m 162m 4692 S0 1.0 0:08.16 apache2 31126 www-data 20 0 290m 111m 4596 S0 0.7 0:05.42 apache2 31112 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.30 apache2 31210 www-data 20 0 287m 108m 4612 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31257 www-data 20 0 287m 107m 4600 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31222 www-data 20 0 286m 107m 4636 S0 0.7 0:05.20 apache2 31410 www-data 20 0 285m 105m 4588 S0 0.7 0:05.10 apache2 31412 www-data 20 0 284m 105m 4656 S0 0.7 0:05.12 apache2 31396 www-data 20 0 284m 105m 4632 S0 0.7 0:05.12 apache2 Note that although some threads do disappear (normal, expect) the ones that stay never free up any RAM. If I were to let this just chill by itself for a few days, res would be a gig or so and virt would be up there. And for good measure, ten minutes: 30458 www-data 20 0 341m 162m 4692 S0 1.0 0:08.22 apache2 31126 www-data 20 0 291m 111m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.48 apache2 31112 www-data 20 0 290m 110m 4620 S0 0.7 0:05.42 apache2 31222 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4652 S0 0.7 0:05.34 apache2 31210 www-data 20 0 288m 109m 4616 S0 0.7 0:05.36 apache2 31257 www-data 20 0 287m 108m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.30 apache2 31410 www-data 20 0 286m 107m 4604 S0 0.7 0:05.22 apache2 31396 www-data 20 0 286m 106m 4636 S0 0.7 0:05.24 apache2 31384 www-data 20 0 286m 106m 4616 S0 0.7 0:05.22 apache2 31412 www-data 20 0 285m 106m 4660 S0 0.7 0:05.18 apache2 The server isn't being used much right now, but as you can see, no memory has really been free'd. Right now I am working around this by reloading apache at 11:59 every night (the saddest cron job on earth), which appears to bring memory usage back down. -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
[Bug 422138] Re: Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Sorry forgot to attach the output of AB after I killed it: ab -n 200 -c 100 -f TLS11 https://scan-stag.osdc/ This is ApacheBench, Version 2.3 $Revision: 655654 $ Copyright 1996 Adam Twiss, Zeus Technology Ltd, http://www.zeustech.net/ Licensed to The Apache Software Foundation, http://www.apache.org/ Benchmarking scan-stag.osdc (be patient) ^C Server Software:Apache Server Hostname:scan-stag.osdc Server Port:443 SSL/TLS Protocol: TLSv1/SSLv3,DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA,4096,256 Document Path: / Document Length:0 bytes Concurrency Level: 100 Time taken for tests: 185.122 seconds Complete requests: 9751 Failed requests:0 Write errors: 0 Non-2xx responses: 9751 Total transferred: 7906663 bytes HTML transferred: 0 bytes Requests per second:52.67 [#/sec] (mean) Time per request: 1898.496 [ms] (mean) Time per request: 18.985 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent requests) Transfer rate: 41.71 [Kbytes/sec] received Connection Times (ms) min mean[+/-sd] median max Connect: 88 319 487.61563229 Processing:20 1571 446.0 17002235 Waiting: 20 1570 445.9 16992235 Total:140 1889 202.1 18745089 Percentage of the requests served within a certain time (ms) 50% 1874 66% 1916 75% 1948 80% 1972 90% 2050 95% 2144 98% 2293 99% 2408 100% 5089 (longest request) -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] [NEW] Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 1. Ubuntu Release Info: Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 2. Package Information: apache2-mpm-prefork: Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Version table: *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 0 500 http://aptproxy hardy-security/main Packages 500 http://aptproxy hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.8-1 0 500 http://aptproxy hardy/main Packages 3. I expect apache to not chew up to a couple gigs per process when it runs for a long time. 4. Apache chews threw a couple gigs per process when it runs for a long time Enabled modules: alias.conf alias.load auth_basic.load authn_file.load authz_default.load authz_groupfile.load authz_host.load authz_user.load autoindex.conf autoindex.load cgi.load deflate.conf deflate.load dir.conf dir.load env.load mime.conf mime.load negotiation.conf negotiation.load php5.conf php5.load rewrite.load setenvif.conf setenvif.load ssl.conf ssl.load status.conf status.load This DOES appear to be a dupe of 224945 (reproducible with ab), however as you can see I am on the hardy-updates version. Is there something obvious I am missing here? ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 420842] Re: Huge memory leak in Rhythmbox
This is reproducible on my machine just by leaving RhythmBox open for a long period of time. One day when it was on for a couple weeks it had something like 100GB VIRT, resident was pretty high most of my RAM was taken by it and tons of swapping was happening. On this machine I have a somewhat large music collection, ~20k audio files, not sure if it has something to do with large libraries. -- Huge memory leak in Rhythmbox https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/420842 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 422138] [NEW] Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apache2 1. Ubuntu Release Info: Description:Ubuntu 8.04.3 LTS Release:8.04 2. Package Information: apache2-mpm-prefork: Installed: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Candidate: 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 Version table: *** 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.11 0 500 http://aptproxy hardy-security/main Packages 500 http://aptproxy hardy-updates/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.8-1 0 500 http://aptproxy hardy/main Packages 3. I expect apache to not chew up to a couple gigs per process when it runs for a long time. 4. Apache chews threw a couple gigs per process when it runs for a long time Enabled modules: alias.conf alias.load auth_basic.load authn_file.load authz_default.load authz_groupfile.load authz_host.load authz_user.load autoindex.conf autoindex.load cgi.load deflate.conf deflate.load dir.conf dir.load env.load mime.conf mime.load negotiation.conf negotiation.load php5.conf php5.load rewrite.load setenvif.conf setenvif.load ssl.conf ssl.load status.conf status.load This DOES appear to be a dupe of 224945 (reproducible with ab), however as you can see I am on the hardy-updates version. Is there something obvious I am missing here? ** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Slow memory leak, seen on two machines, appears to be dupe of 224945 even after -updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/422138 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326230] [NEW] Enter key does not POST in forms in certain case
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 8.10 Release:8.10 firefox: Installed: 3.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 Candidate: 3.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 Version table: *** 3.0.5+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.8.10.1 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid-updates/main Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3.0.3+nobinonly-0ubuntu2 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com intrepid/main Packages What I expect to Happen: Go to google.com, enter a search phrase, hit enter, and it POSTS. What happens instead: Go to google.com, enter a search phrase that ISN'T auto-populated in the dropdown from google, hit enter, and nothing happens. HOWEVER, if you enter a common phrase that does come up in the drop down, like cute puppies, enter works. ** Affects: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Enter key does not POST in forms in certain case https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326230] Re: Enter key does not POST in forms in certain case
BTW, I am on a 64 bit OS. -- Enter key does not POST in forms in certain case https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326230 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 322461] [NEW] apache2ctl returns 0 on connection refused
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 8.04.2
Release:8.04
apache2.2-common 2.2.8-1ubuntu0.3
What I expect to happen: When running apache2ctl status, I expect that
an error such as connection refused will cause the script to exit with
a !0 return code.
What happens instead:
http://www.pastie.org/373460
The problem is at apache2ctl's line 112:
status)
$LYNX $STATUSURL | awk ' /process$/ { print; exit } { print } '
;;
It's a bashism, but you want to set ERROR after this pipeline to
PIPESTATUS array's 0th element, since that awk command is pretty much
always going to exit 0. This is probably upstream, but I reported it
here anyways... since apache is cross-many platforms that may not have
bash, I doubt they'd go for using the pipestatus array.
** Affects: apache (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
apache2ctl returns 0 on connection refused
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322461
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271500] Re: puppetmaster package depends on puppet, wrong behavior
I revisited this today and I didn't accurately describe the problem in the title. Conceptually it seems correct BUT the code in puppetmasterd does import code from puppet. That being said, the real problem is running puppetmasterd and puppetd on the same box, as in the box is a client to itself. The package(s) is/are configured to do some SSL magic and store files in the same working directory. I think the solution to fix this/these package(s) is to have a couple of things happen: 1. Most importantly, fix the init scripts. 2. Do not make puppetd and puppetmasterd have the same working directories. 3. Might want to do some of those cute ncurses dialogs too during .deb postinstall to determine if this is a puppet client or puppetmaster, if client what is the server name and some other options etc. ** Summary changed: - puppetmaster package depends on puppet, wrong behavior + puppetmasterd and puppetd on the same box causing problems -- puppetmasterd and puppetd on the same box causing problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 271500] [NEW] puppetmaster package depends on puppet, wrong behavior
Public bug reported: The puppetmaster package if installed from apt drags down puppet. This is not only unnecessary but it borks the permissions of /var/lib/puppet... to the package maintainer: puppetd runs as root because it does the actual changing of config files puppetmasterd runs as user puppet because there is no need for this daemon to have root privileges, it just needs to read some data to pass to the clients (puppets). I guess puppet used to behave differently prior to this release, but this package looks to be a little messed up here... ** Affects: puppet (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- puppetmaster package depends on puppet, wrong behavior https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/271500 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
