[Bug 1878693] Re: apt upgrade of libjson-c2 causes upstart to crash

2020-05-15 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1878723 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878723

** Also affects: json-c (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: upstart (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1878723
   Kernel panic when used with upstart after 0.11-4ubuntu2.1 update

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1878693

Title:
  apt upgrade of libjson-c2 causes upstart to crash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/json-c/+bug/1878693/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1772038] Re: ubuntu/xubuntu 18.04 kernel crash during install.

2018-07-30 Thread John Edwards
Similar bug report about problems booting 4.15 kernels on HP dc5800 machines on 
RedHat's bugzilla:
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520265

Some people there say that upgrading the BIOS to version 1.6 fixes the
problem, so may be worth a try.


** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1520265
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520265

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772038

Title:
  ubuntu/xubuntu 18.04 kernel crash during install.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1772038/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1772038] Re: ubuntu/xubuntu 18.04 kernel crash during install.

2018-07-30 Thread John Edwards
I have a similar HP dc5800 machine. Booting from 4.15 kernel after
upgrade to Ubuntu 18.04 results in very quick kernel crash (less than 1
second), as does booting from the Ubuntu 18.04 "desktop" install DVD.

In both cases booting with "acpi=off noapic" added to the kernel boot
parameters works fine, except that the machine does not power down after
"/sbin/shutdown -P".

Oddly enough this machine worked fine with the 4.4 kernels from Ubuntu
16.04, so this might be a regression bug in the kernel?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772038

Title:
  ubuntu/xubuntu 18.04 kernel crash during install.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1772038/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1694986] Re: (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation sc

2017-06-01 Thread John Edwards
Sorry don't remember, but it certainly did this time when it succeeded

John

> On 1 Jun 2017, at 20:45, Steve Langasek  wrote:
> 
> I'm glad you were able to upgrade.  It is still important to us to
> understand how your system got into this state, so that we can help
> solve the problem for other users.  Do you remember handling SecureBoot
> on your system previously?
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694986
> 
> Title:
>  (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-
>  signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
>  status 1
> 
> Status in shim-signed package in Ubuntu:
>  New
> 
> Bug description:
>  g
> 
>  ProblemType: Package
>  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
>  Package: shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1
>  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
>  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
>  .proc.sys.kernel.moksbstate_disabled: 0
>  .sys.firmware.efi.efivars.MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23: 
> Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
> '/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23'
>  .sys.firmware.efi.efivars.SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c: 
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1694986/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694986

Title:
  (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-
  signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1694986/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1694986] Re: (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation sc

2017-06-01 Thread John Edwards
Thanks for the reply I have since successfully upgraded

John

> On 1 Jun 2017, at 19:25, Steve Langasek  wrote:
> 
> Thank you for the report.  This shows that you had an unattended upgrade
> that ran and upgraded the version of the nvidia dkms module that you
> have installed; and that this triggered a request from shim to disable
> SecureBoot on your system, because dkms modules are incompatible with
> SecureBoot currently.
> 
> Do you remember being prompted previously about turning off SecureBoot?
> Did you elect not to turn off SecureBoot?  Or, did you choose the option
> to disable SecureBoot, but not confirm this selection on reboot?
> 
> ** Summary changed:
> 
> - package shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to 
> install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
> exit status 1
> + (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-signed 
> 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
> installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
> 
> ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
>   Importance: Undecided => High
> 
> ** Changed in: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)
> 
> -- 
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694986
> 
> Title:
>  (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-
>  signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
>  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
>  status 1
> 
> Status in shim-signed package in Ubuntu:
>  New
> 
> Bug description:
>  g
> 
>  ProblemType: Package
>  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
>  Package: shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1
>  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
>  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
>  .proc.sys.kernel.moksbstate_disabled: 0
>  .sys.firmware.efi.efivars.MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23: 
> Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
> '/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23'
>  .sys.firmware.efi.efivars.SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c: 
> 
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1694986/+subscriptions

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694986

Title:
  (unattended-upgrade, already-installed dkms modules) package shim-
  signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1694986/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1694986] [NEW] package shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2017-06-01 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

g

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
.proc.sys.kernel.moksbstate_disabled: 0
.sys.firmware.efi.efivars.MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23: 
Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 
'/sys/firmware/efi/efivars/MokSBStateRT-605dab50-e046-4300-abb6-3dd810dd8b23'
.sys.firmware.efi.efivars.SecureBoot-8be4df61-93ca-11d2-aa0d-00e098032b8c: 

** Affects: shim-signed (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1694986

Title:
  package shim-signed 1.28+0.9+1474479173.6c180c6-1ubuntu1 failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script
  returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/shim-signed/+bug/1694986/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-08-16 Thread John Edwards
Contents of /etc/init.d/libvirt-bin attached.


** Attachment added: "Contents of /etc/init.d/libvirt-bin"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+attachment/4721984/+files/etc_init.d_libvirt-bin

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-08-16 Thread John Edwards
Contents of /etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf attached.

** Attachment added: "Contents of /etc/init/libvirt-bin.conf"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+attachment/4721985/+files/etc_init_libvirt-bin.conf

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-08-16 Thread John Edwards
My /etc/default/libvirt-bin does not contain the -d option, but the
/etc/init.d/libvirt-bin init script does.

Example:
start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile $PIDFILE \
--exec $DAEMON -- -d $libvirtd_opts

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-08-16 Thread John Edwards
Contents of /etc/default/libvirt-bin:

# Defaults for libvirtd initscript (/etc/init.d/libvirtd)
# This is a POSIX shell fragment

# Start libvirtd to handle qemu/kvm:
start_libvirtd="yes"

# options passed to libvirtd, add "-l" to listen on tcp
#libvirtd_opts=""

# pass in location of kerberos keytab
#export KRB5_KTNAME=/etc/libvirt/libvirt.keytab

# Whether to mount a systemd like cgroup layout (only
# useful when not running systemd)
#mount_cgroups=yes
# Which cgroups to mount
#cgroups="memory devices"


** Attachment added: "/etc/default/libvirt-bin"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+attachment/4721983/+files/etc_default_libvirt-bin

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-08-13 Thread John Edwards
Tried 'apt-get upgrade' again. Same result with the addition of the
previous mentioned apparmor error (which was not present before).
Contents of /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd on this system is
attached.

Syslog of restart:
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Service hold-off time 
over, scheduling restart.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: Stopped Virtualization daemon.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: Starting Virtualization daemon...
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia libvirtd[8449]: libvirt version: 1.3.1, package: 
1ubuntu10.1 (dann frazier  Fri, 03 Jun 2016 14:41:21 -0600)
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia libvirtd[8449]: hostname: 
lydia.local.cornerstonelinux.co.uk
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia libvirtd[8449]: Unable to initialise audit layer: 
Permission denied
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia kernel: [ 1098.685954] audit: type=1400 
audit(1471078771.194:128): apparmor="DENIED" operation="create" 
profile="/usr/sbin/libvirtd" pid=8449 comm="libvirtd" family="netlink" 
sock_type="raw" protocol=9 requested_mask="create" denied_mask="create"
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia libvirtd[8449]: cannot connect to netlink socket with 
protocol 0: Permission denied
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia kernel: [ 1098.748718] audit: type=1400 
audit(1471078771.258:129): apparmor="DENIED" operation="create" 
profile="/usr/sbin/libvirtd" pid=8449 comm="libvirtd" family="netlink" 
sock_type="raw" protocol=0 requested_mask="create" denied_mask="create"
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=6/NOTCONFIGURED
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Unit entered failed 
state.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Service hold-off time 
over, scheduling restart.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: Stopped Virtualization daemon.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Start request repeated 
too quickly.
Aug 13 09:59:31 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.


** Attachment added: "Contents of /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.libvirtd"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+attachment/4720088/+files/usr.sbin.libvirtd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apparmor/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] Re: Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-06-27 Thread John Edwards
Remove 'binfmt-support' package and tried upgrade again. Slightly
different error message from 'systemctl status libvirt-bin.service' this
time with addition of a 'NOTCONFIGURED' message:

Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Main process exited, 
code=exited, status=6/NOTCONFIGURED
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Unit entered failed 
state.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Service hold-off time 
over, scheduling restart.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: Stopped Virtualization daemon.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Start request repeated 
too quickly.
Jun 27 22:57:22 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1594902] [NEW] Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit

2016-06-21 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

Output from 'apt-get upgrade':
Setting up libvirt-bin (1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1) ...
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'screen-cleanup' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'binfmt-support' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'screen-cleanup' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'binfmt-support' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'screen-cleanup' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`screen-cleanup'
initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket 
/com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused
insserv: warning: script 'binfmt-support' missing LSB tags and overrides
insserv: Default-Start undefined, assuming empty start runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
insserv: Default-Stop  undefined, assuming empty stop  runlevel(s) for script 
`binfmt-support'
Job for libvirt-bin.service failed because the control process exited with 
error code. See "systemctl status libvirt-bin.service" and "journalctl -xe" for 
details.
invoke-rc.d: initscript libvirt-bin, action "restart" failed.
dpkg: error processing package libvirt-bin (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


Output from 'systemctl status libvirt-bin.service':
● libvirt-bin.service - Virtualization daemon
   Loaded: loaded (/lib/systemd/system/libvirt-bin.service; enabled; vendor 
preset: enabled)
   Active: inactive (dead) (Result: exit-code) since Tue 2016-06-21 17:55:16 
BST; 4min 52s ago
 Docs: man:libvirtd(8)
   http://libvirt.org
  Process: 2984 ExecStart=/usr/sbin/libvirtd $libvirtd_opts (code=exited, 
status=6)
 Main PID: 2984 (code=exited, status=6)

Jun 21 17:55:15 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.
Jun 21 17:55:15 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Unit entered failed 
state.
Jun 21 17:55:15 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Failed with result 
'exit-code'.
Jun 21 17:55:16 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Service hold-off time 
over, scheduling restart.
Jun 21 17:55:16 lydia systemd[1]: Stopped Virtualization daemon.
Jun 21 17:55:16 lydia systemd[1]: libvirt-bin.service: Start request repeated 
too quickly.
Jun 21 17:55:16 lydia systemd[1]: Failed to start Virtualization daemon.

** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594902

Title:
  Failed to upgrade to libvirt-bin 1.3.1-1ubuntu10.1 on Ubuntu 16.04
  64-bit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1594902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-05-03 Thread John Edwards
In response to comment #27, I think that the problem with clients connecting to 
Samba version 4.3.8 on Ubuntu 14.04 may be a different problem. Some of the 
discussion in bug #1573221 may be relevant, particular setting "client use 
spnego = no".
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1573221

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-05-03 Thread John Edwards
Another problem with "client ipc signing" is that on a machine that has just 
joined the domain, domain users can not login. Samba logs report:
[2016/05/03 12:37:54.226769,  1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1845(api_pipe_request)
  srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer: failed
[2016/05/03 12:37:54.273670,  1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1845(api_pipe_request)
  srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer: failed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-04-29 Thread John Edwards
One problem with changing "client ipc signing" is that it is not
documented in the man pages of these packages for Ubuntu 12.04 and the
settings are different to the Samba packages in Ubuntu 14.04 (where the
possible settings are "auto", "mandatory" and "disabled").

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572824] Re: Samba Domain Member cannot check passwords against Samba AD DC after "Badlock" update

2016-04-27 Thread John Edwards
The RPC errors make me think this may be related to the DCERPC problems
that were causing problems with domain trust functions in bug #1572122 .
A source code patch is available in Samba but has not been applied or
tested in Ubuntu.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572824

Title:
  Samba Domain Member cannot check passwords against Samba AD DC after
  "Badlock" update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572824/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain

2016-04-25 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

@Michael #8, yes the problem was all of our servers run with an LDAP
backend so I could not test a server without that. Bug seems to be more
in the domain trust area or RPC.

This is the proposed patch by Andreas Schneider, who has been working on the 
problem at Red Hat:
https://git.samba.org/?p=asn/samba.git;a=commit;h=82fa625540abf8b8ec23d43c41e2ca906a9928a5

And that patch seems to be in RPC and so probably independent of LDAP.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228

Title:
  Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients
  from logging in to NT4 style domain

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-04-25 Thread John Edwards
Contents of Andreas_Schneider patch to srv_pipe.c to fix the regression
verifying the security trailer, taken from
https://git.samba.org/?p=asn/samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=82fa625540abf8b8ec23d43c41e2ca906a9928a5;hp=ea6f2386611d0a4edd65962a59b3448be976c1bb

--- a/source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c
+++ b/source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c
@@ -1552,7 +1552,6 @@ static bool srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer(struct 
pipes_struct *p,
 {
TALLOC_CTX *frame = talloc_stackframe();
struct dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer *vt = NULL;
-   const uint32_t bitmask1 = 0;
const struct dcerpc_sec_vt_pcontext pcontext = {
.abstract_syntax = pipe_fns->syntax,
.transfer_syntax = ndr_transfer_syntax,
@@ -1573,7 +1572,7 @@ static bool srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer(struct 
pipes_struct *p,
goto done;
}
 
-   ret = dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer_check(vt, ,
+   ret = dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer_check(vt, NULL,
, );
 done:
TALLOC_FREE(frame);


** Patch added: "~/temp/firefox-downloads/Andreas_Schneider_srv_pipe.c.patch"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+attachment/4646754/+files/Andreas_Schneider_srv_pipe.c.patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

2016-04-25 Thread John Edwards
Contents of Andreas_Schneider patch to srv_pipe.c to fix the regression
verifying the security trailer, taken from
https://git.samba.org/?p=asn/samba.git;a=commitdiff;h=82fa625540abf8b8ec23d43c41e2ca906a9928a5;hp=ea6f2386611d0a4edd65962a59b3448be976c1bb

--- a/source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c
+++ b/source3/rpc_server/srv_pipe.c
@@ -1552,7 +1552,6 @@ static bool srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer(struct 
pipes_struct *p,
 {
TALLOC_CTX *frame = talloc_stackframe();
struct dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer *vt = NULL;
-   const uint32_t bitmask1 = 0;
const struct dcerpc_sec_vt_pcontext pcontext = {
.abstract_syntax = pipe_fns->syntax,
.transfer_syntax = ndr_transfer_syntax,
@@ -1573,7 +1572,7 @@ static bool srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer(struct 
pipes_struct *p,
goto done;
}
 
-   ret = dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer_check(vt, ,
+   ret = dcerpc_sec_verification_trailer_check(vt, NULL,
, );
 done:
TALLOC_FREE(frame);

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-25 Thread John Edwards
As a second person has confirm that the problem also effects Windows XP
clients I have update the title of the bug. In my experience it seems to
only effect domain functions, basic SMB file sharing seems OK.


** Summary changed:

- Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only  for my w7 clients
+ Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade to 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 break domain authentication

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1574228] Re: Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients from logging in to NT4 style domain

2016-04-25 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1572122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Are you using an LDAP backend?
This may be a duplicate of bug #1572122.


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1572122
   Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only  for my w7 clients

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1574228

Title:
  Changes to Samba packages for April 12 prevent legacy Windows clients
  from logging in to NT4 style domain

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1574228/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-20 Thread John Edwards
I should mention that all the servers effected where using the LDAP
backend setup via smbldap-tools. Some server were running winbind but
not all. Machines were mix of 32-bit and 64-bit installs.

Clients with login problems were both Windows 7 and XP joined to a
domain. Sometimes a user could login to a machine using a recently used
user account (info probably cached on locally on Windows machine). File
access to server was fine. Leaving and rejoining the domain produced no
error, but users could still not login.

Example of Samba log file from when the login failed:
[2016/04/19 10:00:37.960814,  0] rpc_server/netlogon/srv_netlog_nt.c:976(_netr_S
erverAuthenticate3)
  _netr_ServerAuthenticate3: netlogon_creds_server_check failed. Rejecting auth 
request from client WIN7-DATABASE machine account WIN7-DATABASE$
[2016/04/19 10:00:37.978252,  1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1845(api_pipe_request)
  srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer: failed
[2016/04/19 10:00:50.068608,  1] smbd/process.c:457(receive_smb_talloc)
[2016/04/19 10:01:39.597632,  0] rpc_server/netlogon/srv_netlog_nt.c:976(_netr_S
erverAuthenticate3)
  _netr_ServerAuthenticate3: netlogon_creds_server_check failed. Rejecting auth 
request from client WIN7-DATABASE machine account WIN7-DATABASE$
[2016/04/19 10:01:39.620571,  1] rpc_server/srv_pipe.c:1845(api_pipe_request)
  srv_pipe_check_verification_trailer: failed
[2016/04/19 10:01:55.838151,  1] smbd/process.c:457(receive_smb_talloc)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only  for my w7 clients

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1572122] Re: Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only for my w7 clients

2016-04-20 Thread John Edwards
In response to comment #6, all the Ubuntu 12.04 machines we upgraded to
Samba version 3.6.25-0ubuntu0.12.04.2 suffered from this problem and
none of them had "allow dcerpc auth level connect = yes" in the smb.conf
file. So I think you may be looking at a different problem.

Another test command I have used is running 'net rpc group -S localhost
-U Administrator'. On a non-upgraded machine this returns the list of
Samba groups in LDAP. On an upgraded machine it returns "Connection
failed: NT_STATUS_ACCESS_DENIED".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572122

Title:
  Samba upgrade break LDAP authentification only  for my w7 clients

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/1572122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1479062] [NEW] Wine 1.6 doesn't work with kernel 3.13 build 59

2015-07-28 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

On my system, Wine 1.6 doesn't work with kernel 3.13 build 59. When I
get back to build 58, the app works fine.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: linux-image-3.13.0-58-generic 3.13.0-58.97
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-58.97-generic 3.13.11-ckt22
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-58-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  chaton 2498 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  chaton 2498 F pulseaudio
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Tue Jul 28 19:44:35 2015
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=1d324d9f-f277-40c5-816c-c1d8d705e56d
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-05-17 (437 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 14.04 LTS Trusty Tahr - Release amd64 (20140416.2)
MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R720
ProcFB: 0 radeondrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-3.13.0-58-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/xubuntu-sys ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-3.13.0-58-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-3.13.0-58-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware 1.127.14
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 09/21/2009
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
dmi.bios.version: 01LT.M012.20090921.JIP
dmi.board.name: R720
dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr01LT.M012.20090921.JIP:bd09/21/2009:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR720:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR720:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: R720
dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

** Affects: wine1.6 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug trusty

** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) = wine1.6 (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1479062

Title:
  Wine 1.6 doesn't work with kernel 3.13 build 59

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1479062/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Also tried SSL with LDAPS on port 636, but still the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Reverted to an earlier snapshot of the virtual machine I was testing
amavisd on, then installed the latest Debian package of amavisd-new
(version 2.10.1-1) and can confirm that this works.

Could this be a candidate for a backport release?

Although I am still not sure of the cause of this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
CORRECTION: After updating the configuration and reverting to debugging
options I think the latest Debian package of amavisd-new (version
2.10.1-1) will run when STARTTLS is enabled in /etc/ldap.conf. Needs
more testing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Reverted to an earlier snapshot of the virtual machine I was testing
amavisd on, then installed the latest Debian package of amavisd-new
(version 2.10.1-1) and can confirm that this works.

Could this be a candidate for a backport release?

Although I am still not sure of the cause of this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Also tried SSL with LDAPS on port 636, but still the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Also tried the latest Debian package of amavisd-new (version 2.10.1-1)
and that has the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
Also tried the latest Debian package of amavisd-new (version 2.10.1-1)
and that has the same problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-15 Thread John Edwards
CORRECTION: After updating the configuration and reverting to debugging
options I think the latest Debian package of amavisd-new (version
2.10.1-1) will run when STARTTLS is enabled in /etc/ldap.conf. Needs
more testing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-14 Thread John Edwards
Yes, I also have a few error messages containing amavis[1533]: nss-
ldap: do_open: do_start_tls failed:stat=-1.

Removing ssl start_tls from /etc/ldap.conf allows amavis to start. So
the problem looks to be when amavis checking libnss when  it is set to
use LDAP with STARTTLS.

The TLS certificates used by the LDAP server are signed by the company
CA which is set in the tls_cacertfile option in /etc/ldap.conf. They
work fine when using getent password and other commands. The same
certificates also work fine in Ubuntu 12.04.

Setting libnss to not check certificate by adding tls_checkpeer no to
/etc/ldap.conf to not change behaviour.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-14 Thread John Edwards
Yes, I also have a few error messages containing amavis[1533]: nss-
ldap: do_open: do_start_tls failed:stat=-1.

Removing ssl start_tls from /etc/ldap.conf allows amavis to start. So
the problem looks to be when amavis checking libnss when  it is set to
use LDAP with STARTTLS.

The TLS certificates used by the LDAP server are signed by the company
CA which is set in the tls_cacertfile option in /etc/ldap.conf. They
work fine when using getent password and other commands. The same
certificates also work fine in Ubuntu 12.04.

Setting libnss to not check certificate by adding tls_checkpeer no to
/etc/ldap.conf to not change behaviour.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-14 Thread John Edwards
I have meet this problem with email servers that have been upgraded from
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty). Amavis starts at
boot and with the debug option, but fails to start via the init script
or the command line ('sudo -u amavis strace /usr/sbin/amavisd-new
start').

I have done some basic debugging and testing with different
configurations:

1) Installing amavisd-new and spamassassin on clean install of Ubuntu 14.04, 
then enabling virus and spam check with:
@bypass_virus_checks_maps = (
   \%bypass_virus_checks, \@bypass_virus_checks_acl, \$bypass_virus_checks_re);
@bypass_spam_checks_maps = (
   \%bypass_spam_checks, \@bypass_spam_checks_acl, \$bypass_spam_checks_re);

Allows amavis to be started and restarted cleanly.

2) Copying this configuration files in /etc/amavis/ to a machine that is
effected by this bug does not fix the problem, so I conclude that the
problem is not with the configuration files.

3) Purging and reinstalling the amavisd-new and spamassassin packages on
an effected machines does not fix the problem.

4) On a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 (where amavisd was working) I
installed and configured the machine to be similar to the machine where
amavisd was not working. At each stage I checked that amavisd could be
restarted via the init script.

After I installed and configured the slapd LDAP server and configured
libnss and libpam to use it, then amavisd failed to restart. When slapd
was stopped then amavisd could started, but if it slapd was running that
amavisd will not start via the init script. Amavisd seems to run fine if
it started before slapd. This was then also tested and confirmed on the
original machine that had been upgraded from Ubuntu 12.04.

So this suggests that something in LDAP, PAM or NSS is causing amavis to
fail to start. This is very odd because all the system accounts are in
the local /etc/passwd and /etc/group files and should have nothing to do
with LDAP users and groups. The amavis user is only a member of it's own
amavis group, and the amavis group only contains the amavis and clamav
users.

The LDAP configuration has 4 users and 19 groups created by the smbldap
programs, and all of these are used by end-users and should not be used
by the amavis user or group.

PAM is managed by the pam-auth-update system with LDAP configuration enabled:
 START 
$ grep -ir ldap /etc/pam.d/*
/etc/pam.d/common-account:account   [success=1 default=ignore]  
pam_ldap.so 
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:# (e.g., /etc/shadow, LDAP, Kerberos, etc.).  The 
default is to use the
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:auth [success=1 default=ignore]  pam_ldap.so 
use_first_pass
/etc/pam.d/common-password:password [success=1 user_unknown=ignore 
default=die] pam_ldap.so use_authtok try_first_pass
/etc/pam.d/common-session:session   optional
pam_ldap.so 
/etc/pam.d/common-session-noninteractive:sessionoptional
pam_ldap.so 
  END  

Contents of /etc/nsswitch.conf:
 START 
passwd: compat ldap
group:  compat ldap
shadow: compat ldap

hosts:  files dns
networks:   files

protocols:  db files
services:   db files
ethers: db files
rpc:db files

netgroup:   nis
  END  

I wonder if any of the other people who have met this bug are using any
other PAM or NSS beyond the basic local /etc/passwd and /etc/group
files?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to amavisd-new in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1316293] Re: unable to start

2015-01-14 Thread John Edwards
I have meet this problem with email servers that have been upgraded from
Ubuntu 12.04 (precise) to Ubuntu 14.04 (trusty). Amavis starts at
boot and with the debug option, but fails to start via the init script
or the command line ('sudo -u amavis strace /usr/sbin/amavisd-new
start').

I have done some basic debugging and testing with different
configurations:

1) Installing amavisd-new and spamassassin on clean install of Ubuntu 14.04, 
then enabling virus and spam check with:
@bypass_virus_checks_maps = (
   \%bypass_virus_checks, \@bypass_virus_checks_acl, \$bypass_virus_checks_re);
@bypass_spam_checks_maps = (
   \%bypass_spam_checks, \@bypass_spam_checks_acl, \$bypass_spam_checks_re);

Allows amavis to be started and restarted cleanly.

2) Copying this configuration files in /etc/amavis/ to a machine that is
effected by this bug does not fix the problem, so I conclude that the
problem is not with the configuration files.

3) Purging and reinstalling the amavisd-new and spamassassin packages on
an effected machines does not fix the problem.

4) On a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 (where amavisd was working) I
installed and configured the machine to be similar to the machine where
amavisd was not working. At each stage I checked that amavisd could be
restarted via the init script.

After I installed and configured the slapd LDAP server and configured
libnss and libpam to use it, then amavisd failed to restart. When slapd
was stopped then amavisd could started, but if it slapd was running that
amavisd will not start via the init script. Amavisd seems to run fine if
it started before slapd. This was then also tested and confirmed on the
original machine that had been upgraded from Ubuntu 12.04.

So this suggests that something in LDAP, PAM or NSS is causing amavis to
fail to start. This is very odd because all the system accounts are in
the local /etc/passwd and /etc/group files and should have nothing to do
with LDAP users and groups. The amavis user is only a member of it's own
amavis group, and the amavis group only contains the amavis and clamav
users.

The LDAP configuration has 4 users and 19 groups created by the smbldap
programs, and all of these are used by end-users and should not be used
by the amavis user or group.

PAM is managed by the pam-auth-update system with LDAP configuration enabled:
 START 
$ grep -ir ldap /etc/pam.d/*
/etc/pam.d/common-account:account   [success=1 default=ignore]  
pam_ldap.so 
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:# (e.g., /etc/shadow, LDAP, Kerberos, etc.).  The 
default is to use the
/etc/pam.d/common-auth:auth [success=1 default=ignore]  pam_ldap.so 
use_first_pass
/etc/pam.d/common-password:password [success=1 user_unknown=ignore 
default=die] pam_ldap.so use_authtok try_first_pass
/etc/pam.d/common-session:session   optional
pam_ldap.so 
/etc/pam.d/common-session-noninteractive:sessionoptional
pam_ldap.so 
  END  

Contents of /etc/nsswitch.conf:
 START 
passwd: compat ldap
group:  compat ldap
shadow: compat ldap

hosts:  files dns
networks:   files

protocols:  db files
services:   db files
ethers: db files
rpc:db files

netgroup:   nis
  END  

I wonder if any of the other people who have met this bug are using any
other PAM or NSS beyond the basic local /etc/passwd and /etc/group
files?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316293

Title:
  unable to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amavisd-new/+bug/1316293/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290825] Re: Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because 'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

2014-03-20 Thread John Edwards
I can confirmed that the recent patch to utils.py fixes the problem on
Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04 upgrades.

The utils.py code has been around for a while, so I think this problem
may also effect other upgrades (eg 10.04 to 12.04).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290825

Title:
  Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because
  'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1290825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290825] Re: Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because 'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

2014-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Adding the ubuntu-release-upgrader package because I think this is
where the code which runs the update is created from.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290825

Title:
  Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because
  'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1290825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290825] Re: Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because 'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

2014-03-13 Thread John Edwards
Suggested patch for a one line change to utils.py in the trusty update-
manager code  that is unpacked into /tmp/.


** Patch added: Patch to add '-n' option to 'iptables -L'
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1290825/+attachment/4022075/+files/utils.py.patch

** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290825

Title:
  Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because
  'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1290825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984810] Re: -u options fails with Undefined subroutine main::user_by_uid

2014-03-12 Thread John Edwards
Seems to be in version 0.9.7-1ubuntu1 on Ubuntu 14.04 beta1.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984810

Title:
  -u options fails with Undefined subroutine main::user_by_uid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smbldap-tools/+bug/984810/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1290825] [NEW] Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because 'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

2014-03-11 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

An upgrade from Ubuntu 12.04 to 14.04 using 'sudo do-release-upgrade -d' takes 
a long time (over 3 minutes) to start after answering yes to the question:
If you continue, an additional SSH daemon will be started at port '1022'.  Do 
you want to continue? 

Running 'ps afx' at this time shows that 'iptables -L' is being run from
'/usr/bin/python /tmp/update-manager-djUfxZ/trusty --mode=server
--frontend=DistUpgradeViewText'

I think this is because there is an iptables blacklist created by the
shorewall package. So running 'iptables' without the '-n' option to
disable DNS lookups means that a DNS query is launched for every IP
address in the blacklist, some of which do not resolve and so the
upgrade scripts has to wait for a timeout on each of them.

Example of iptables being run with DNS lookups:
$ sudo time -p iptables -L  /dev/null
real 174.34
user 0.08
sys 0.09

Example of iptables being run without DNS lookups:
$ sudo time -p iptables -nL  /dev/null
real 0.08
user 0.00
sys 0.00

The code that runs the 'iptables -L' command seems to be in the utils.py
in the update-manager temp directory in /tmp/ (/tmp/update-manager-
djUfxZ/utils.py in this case) and as far as I can tell is only run to
see if iptabes is active or not.

So would it be possible to change the iptables command to be 'iptables
-nL' so that DNS queries are disabled?

I think this bug may also effect other upgrades, for example 10.04 to
12.04.

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: dist-upgrade

** Tags added: dist-upgrade

** Summary changed:

- Upgrade using takes a long time to start because 'iptables -L' runs with DNS 
lookups enabled
+ Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because 'iptables 
-L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290825

Title:
  Upgrade using do-release-upgrade takes a long time to start because
  'iptables -L' runs with DNS lookups enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1290825/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 980573] Re: apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found in an unexpected directory error message

2013-10-22 Thread John Edwards
This now effects one of my machines that was upgraded to Ubuntu 12.04
from 10.04 a few months ago.

I used aptitude to upgrade the kernel and libc packages released
yesterday (21 Oct 2013) which failed with similar errors to above. Below
is a dump of 'sudo apt-get install -f' ran afterwards:

$ sudo apt-get install -f
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
  linux-image-server
Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
The following extra packages will be installed:
  libc6 linux-headers-3.2.0-55-generic-pae linux-headers-generic-pae
The following NEW packages will be installed
  linux-headers-3.2.0-55-generic-pae
The following packages will be upgraded:
  libc6 linux-headers-generic-pae
2 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 11 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0 B/4,923 kB of archives.
After this operation, 11.3 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 
dpkg: warning: files list file for package `libc6' missing, assuming package 
has no files currently installed.
(Reading database ... 437713 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace libc6 2.15-0ubuntu10.4 (using 
.../libc6_2.15-0ubuntu10.5_i386.deb) ...

A copy of the C library was found in an unexpected directory:
  '/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc-2.15.so'
It is not safe to upgrade the C library in this situation;
please remove that copy of the C library or get it out of
'/lib/i386-linux-gnu' and try again.

dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.15-0ubuntu10.5_i386.deb 
(--unpack):
 subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
No apport report written because MaxReports has already been reached
Errors were 
encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.15-0ubuntu10.5_i386.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980573

Title:
  apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found
  in an unexpected directory error message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/980573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 980573] Re: apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found in an unexpected directory error message

2013-10-22 Thread John Edwards
In my report I think the key

There were not files in /var/lib/dpkg/info/ for libc6:i386, only for
libc6 (ie /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.list existed but
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6:i386.list did not).

I created the /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6:i386.list file from the contents
of the downloaded deb package using:

dpkg-deb -c /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.15-0ubuntu10.5_i386.deb |
awk {'sub(/^\./,,$6);sub(/^\/$/,/.,$6); sub(/\/$/,,$6); print $6'}
 /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6:i386.list

After this 'apt-get install -f' run correctly and the libc6 package was
upgraded. Then the rest of the package upgrades were done via aptitude.

The mention of libc6:i386 suggests that the problem maybe linked to
multiarch, but I can not be sure. I also suggest that copying
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.list to /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6:i386.list
might also work temporarily.

So fixed for me for the moment.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980573

Title:
  apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found
  in an unexpected directory error message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/980573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 980573] Re: apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found in an unexpected directory error message

2013-10-22 Thread John Edwards
Correction for my previous post. The first line should have read:

In my report I think the key is the line which warns that the files list
file for package `libc6' is missing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980573

Title:
  apt-get fails at libc6 upgrade with A copy of the C library was found
  in an unexpected directory error message

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/980573/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 520763] Re: chdir() back to old working directory is pointless and can fail

2013-07-09 Thread John Edwards
I  get this error, I am also using Ubuntu 13.04. My home directory is
NFS mounted and secured with Kerberos preventing the local root account
from gaining access.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520763

Title:
  chdir() back to old working directory is pointless and can fail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/520763/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1199370] Re: mintupdate / apt requires access to my home directory

2013-07-09 Thread John Edwards
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/520763

** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199370

Title:
  mintupdate / apt requires access to my home directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linuxmint/+bug/1199370/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082528] Re: No bind backend compiled in

2012-12-17 Thread John Edwards
I have also met this problems on Ubuntu 12.04 with pdns-server and pdns-
backend-mysql packages version 3.0-1.1ubuntu1.

PowerDNS was installed and worked with MySQL.

I then included a known good BIND configuration from another server to
/etc/bind/named.conf.local . Then copied /usr/share/doc/pdns-
server/examples/pdns.local.bind to /etc/powerdns/pdns.d/pdns.local.bind,
added launch=bind and uncommented the bind-example-zones and bind-
config=/etc/bind/named.conf.local lines.

Error messages from syslog:
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12709]: Listening on controlsocket in 
'/var/run/pdns.controlsocket'
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12711]: Guardian is launching an instance
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12711]: Reading random entropy from '/dev/urandom'
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12711]: This is module gmysqlbackend.so reporting
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12711]: This is a guarded instance of pdns
Dec 17 18:22:34 ff0067 pdns[12711]: Fatal error: Trying to set unexisting 
parameter 'bind-example-zones'
Dec 17 18:22:35 ff0067 pdns[12709]: Our pdns instance exited with code 1
Dec 17 18:22:35 ff0067 pdns[12709]: Respawning

I tried disabling the bind-example-zones options and got the message:
Fatal error: Trying to set unexisting parameter 'bind-config'
(bind-config being the next bind specific option in the 
/etc/powerdns/pdns.d/pdns.local.bind file)

I also tried moving the bind and launch options into
/etc/powerdns/pdns.con, and disabling the MySQL configuration in
/etc/powerdns/pdns.d/pdns.local.gmysql to make it a plain install.
Neither seemed to make any difference.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082528

Title:
  No bind backend compiled in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pdns/+bug/1082528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1082528] Re: No bind backend compiled in

2012-12-17 Thread John Edwards
Some more research leads to this PowerDNS bug:
  http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/502

Which is mentioned in the NEWS.Debian.gz file in pdns 3.1 Debian packages, but 
not in the Ubuntu packages:

  pdns now ships an empty, but activated bind backend so that the daemon
  can launch immediately. Since PowerDNS only allows a single launch
  statement (see http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/502), you need to
  adapt either the new simplebind configuration or your custom
  configuration.

  PowerDNS will not flag multiple launch statements as an error, but it
  will only honor one of them. Be aware of that if your PowerDNS
  complains about configuration for a not enabled backend.


Basically you can only have one launch= line anywhere in any of the PowerDNS 
configuration files, see:
http://doc.powerdns.com/pdns-users-faq.html

Perhaps this could be added to the documentation in the Ubuntu package?


** Bug watch added: wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ #502
   http://wiki.powerdns.com/trac/ticket/502

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1082528

Title:
  No bind backend compiled in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pdns/+bug/1082528/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 984810] [NEW] -u options fails with Undefined subroutine main::user_by_uid

2012-04-18 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

Adding a user with the -u options for a specified UID fails because the
user_by_uid function is not exported by the smbldap_tools.pm (or
smbldap_tools.pl in original source code) library:

Example:
 start 
$ sudo /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -a -m -u 1099 test
Use of qw(...) as parentheses is deprecated at 
/usr/share/perl5/smbldap_tools.pm line 1423, DATA line 522.
Undefined subroutine main::user_by_uid called at /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd 
line 218.
  end 

There is a FreeBSD bug report with more detail here:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=161967

A simple one line patch already exists upstream here:

http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/smbldap-tools/trunk/smbldap_tools.pl?r1=123r2=124

The deprecated parentheses is non-fatal and fixed by the previous patch:

http://svn.gna.org/viewcvs/smbldap-tools/trunk/smbldap_tools.pl?r1=121r2=123

The package in Debian unstable probably also has the same problems.

** Affects: smbldap-tools (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/984810

Title:
  -u options fails with Undefined subroutine main::user_by_uid

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smbldap-tools/+bug/984810/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 920230] Re: Incorrect sidebar rendering with Monobook skin and Firefox 9

2012-02-03 Thread John Edwards
I think this is now a little more serious because Firefox 9 has been
pushed out to Ubuntu 10.04 users.

Could this make it a candidate to be backported to Ubuntu 10.04?

Version 1.18.1 has been in Debian experimental since 15 Jan 2012:
  
http://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=mediawikisearchon=namessuite=allsection=all

More details on the problem here:
  
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8808677/firefox-9-0-1-broke-internal-wiki-layout

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/920230

Title:
  Incorrect sidebar rendering with Monobook skin and Firefox 9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mediawiki/+bug/920230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 790532] Re: pam upgrade broke cron

2011-05-31 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm the problem and restarting cron appears to be a solution.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790532

Title:
  pam upgrade broke cron

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2011-04-15 Thread John Edwards
derekshow, have you tried adding '/sbin/reload smbd' at the end of
/etc/rc.local ?

That does not restart the Samba smbd processes, but does force them to
reload their configuration - including asking CUPS for a list of
printers.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141

Title:
  CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to
  upstart)

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2011-04-15 Thread John Edwards
derekshaw, you do not need to *restart* smbd, only *reload* it.

And it is best to give the full path to the program in case the shell
you are using has not automatically added /sbin to your $PATH variable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141

Title:
  CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to
  upstart)

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2011-04-15 Thread John Edwards
derekshow, have you tried adding '/sbin/reload smbd' at the end of
/etc/rc.local ?

That does not restart the Samba smbd processes, but does force them to
reload their configuration - including asking CUPS for a list of
printers.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141

Title:
  CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to
  upstart)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 494141] Re: CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to upstart)

2011-04-15 Thread John Edwards
derekshaw, you do not need to *restart* smbd, only *reload* it.

And it is best to give the full path to the program in case the shell
you are using has not automatically added /sbin to your $PATH variable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141

Title:
  CUPS starts after SAMBA; printers are not available (convert cups to
  upstart)

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 543148] Re: Private Archive Permissions Are Incorrect

2011-04-05 Thread John Edwards
I can also confirm the problem on Ubuntu 10.04, where the archives
directories are owned by root and so mailman can not write to them.

$ ls -al /var/lib/mailman/archives/
total 16
drwxrwsr-x 4 root list 4096 2011-04-01 16:58 .
drwxrwsr-x 8 root list 4096 2011-04-01 16:58 ..
drwxrws--- 2 root www-data 4096 2011-02-17 15:31 private
drwxrwsr-x 2 root list 4096 2011-02-17 15:31 public

Running 'sudo /usr/lib/mailman/bin/check_perms -f' fixes the permissions
by changing them to list:list, but this needs to be done after each new
mailing lists is created.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to mailman in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543148

Title:
  Private Archive Permissions Are Incorrect

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 543148] Re: Private Archive Permissions Are Incorrect

2011-04-05 Thread John Edwards
I can also confirm the problem on Ubuntu 10.04, where the archives
directories are owned by root and so mailman can not write to them.

$ ls -al /var/lib/mailman/archives/
total 16
drwxrwsr-x 4 root list 4096 2011-04-01 16:58 .
drwxrwsr-x 8 root list 4096 2011-04-01 16:58 ..
drwxrws--- 2 root www-data 4096 2011-02-17 15:31 private
drwxrwsr-x 2 root list 4096 2011-02-17 15:31 public

Running 'sudo /usr/lib/mailman/bin/check_perms -f' fixes the permissions
by changing them to list:list, but this needs to be done after each new
mailing lists is created.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543148

Title:
  Private Archive Permissions Are Incorrect

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660535] Re: Samba [printers] section doesn't work

2011-04-03 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 494141 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494141

Just to mention that smbd does *not* refresh CUPS printers every 750
seconds. You need to send it a reload (or SIGHUP) .

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660535

Title:
  Samba [printers] section doesn't work

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 660535] Re: Samba [printers] section doesn't work

2011-04-01 Thread John Edwards
This looks related to bug #494141, where Samba does not show CUPS printers 
because CUPS starts after smbd:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/494141/

A long term fix may be in the CUPS upstart configuration, but that
doesn't help people using Ubuntu 10.04 LTS where CUPS is still using a
SysV startup script instead of upstart. Some suggested workarounds for
Ubuntu 10.04 are given in that bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660535

Title:
  Samba [printers] section doesn't work

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: system services using console output not starting at boot

2011-02-12 Thread John Edwards
Jens Schødt, this bug is in the kernel console device not being
writeable early enough in the boot. I appears to be in upstart because
that is the first thing that tries to write to it. A work around has
been available of the problem for several months, which seems to have
fixed the boot for those people who reported to this bug.

So if you have a fully updated machine and still see problems like
'runlevel' reporting 'N' then I recommend you put the details of your
problem in a new bug report and place a link to this bug report as a
possible duplicate (but don't mark as confirmed duplicate).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172

Title:
  system services using console output not starting at boot

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 554172] Re: system services using console output not starting at boot

2011-01-13 Thread John Edwards
David, if you get runlevel 2 it means that you have a different problem
to this bug (which is about upstart not entering runlevel 2).

If it only effects Apache than I would suggest opening a new bug against
that relevant Apache package (if one does not already exist). If it does
turn out to be an upstart bug then it can reassigned to that package.

You might also want to try some of the suggestions in this and related
bug reports, such as commenting out the console output lines in the
files in the /etc/init/ directory.

As for your other comments, Ubuntu servers are package-stable for LTS
releases, but not as conservative as Debian or Red Hat - that is one of
the reasons why Ubuntu exists. I run over 50 Ubuntu servers and only 1
machine was effected by the upstart bug, and that was 9 years old and
only used for testing. That fact that only one of your machines has this
problem does point to it be a little obscure and not something that is
commonly met.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172

Title:
  system services using console output not starting at boot

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: system services using console output not starting at boot

2011-01-12 Thread John Edwards
David Haskins, could you run the 'runlevel' command to check if this is
related to this particular bug, or if it is another problem?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172

Title:
  system services using console output not starting at boot

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 697181] Re: DoS: Infinite loop processing 2.2250738585072011e-308

2011-01-05 Thread John Edwards
Confirmed in Ubuntu 10.04 lucid using:
echo '?php $d = 2.2250738585072011e-308; ?' | time -p php5
which hangs.

Ubuntu 8.04 hardy does not hang.


** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697181

Title:
  DoS: Infinite loop processing 2.2250738585072011e-308

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 697181] Re: DoS: Infinite loop processing 2.2250738585072011e-308

2011-01-05 Thread John Edwards
Confirmed in Ubuntu 10.04 lucid using:
echo '?php $d = 2.2250738585072011e-308; ?' | time -p php5
which hangs.

Ubuntu 8.04 hardy does not hang.


** Changed in: php5 (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697181

Title:
  DoS: Infinite loop processing 2.2250738585072011e-308

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 667841] Re: some virtual machines hang upon boot with maverick kernel on lucid host

2010-11-03 Thread John Edwards
Hi, Just a suggestion, but this sounds like a previous apparmor problem
I had.

Try killing all the virtual machines, restarting apparmour and then
libvirt, then start the virtual machines one at a time.

-- 
some virtual machines hang upon boot with maverick kernel on lucid host
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667841
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to kvm in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 667841] Re: some virtual machines hang upon boot with maverick kernel on lucid host

2010-11-03 Thread John Edwards
Hi, Just a suggestion, but this sounds like a previous apparmor problem
I had.

Try killing all the virtual machines, restarting apparmour and then
libvirt, then start the virtual machines one at a time.

-- 
some virtual machines hang upon boot with maverick kernel on lucid host
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667841
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599515] Re: mdadm misdetects disks instead of partitions

2010-10-15 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm this after installing Ubuntu 10.04.1 server with two 500GB
disks with two RAID1 partitions (1st 20GB for rootfs, the rest for LVM).
The 2nd RAID is incorrectly setup as /dev/sda and /dev/sdb.

Zero'ing the superblock on /dev/sda results in the superblock on
/dev/sda2 going as well.

Item 11 in this obscure Debian mdadm FAQ maybe related, though I did not see 
the same error message:
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-mdadm/mdadm.git;a=blob_plain;f=debian/FAQ;hb=HEAD

I think the problem lies with the partitioner in the installer using every 
available KB of space at the end of the disk, resulting in the superblock area 
for /dev/sda and /dev/sda2 overlapping. For details on where the superblock is 
stored see:
https://raid.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/RAID_superblock_formats

The workaround I used was to end the partitions a few MB from the end of
the disk.

-- 
mdadm misdetects disks instead of partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 599515] Re: mdadm misdetects disks instead of partitions

2010-10-15 Thread John Edwards
** Package changed: mdadm (Ubuntu) = debian-installer (Ubuntu)

-- 
mdadm misdetects disks instead of partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599515
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: system services not starting at boot

2010-08-14 Thread John Edwards
The patched version of upstart looks so far. 25 reboots on the dual CPU
Pentium 3 machine and it has entered runlevel 2 each time.

-- 
system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-08-05 Thread John Edwards
Robbie Williamson, I can confirm that this effects 2.6.32-24-generic
#39.

I upgrade the Dual CPU Pentium 3 server (see comment 151, 162 and 195) 
yesterday to test this, and it failed to enter runlevel 2:

$ runlevel
unknown
$ uname -a
Linux aa39.uk.fabit.net 2.6.32-24-generic-pae #39-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul 28 
07:39:26 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux


About 20 other machines (virtual and real hardware) have been upgraded
to 10.04 without meeting this problem, so it may take some time and
different hardware combinations to recreate. If you need any more
details on this server then let me know or look at the attachment to
comment #195.

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: system services not starting at boot

2010-08-05 Thread John Edwards
akaname, I've only seen it on one machine and that had two Pentium 3
CPUs (separate chips).

Of the machines which have not seen this problem, the virtual machines
are all single processor and the servers all had multiple core CPUs
(Pentium D, AMD X2, Core2 Duo and Quad).

There were a few desktop machines upgraded to Ubuntu 10.04 that had
single core CPUs - Pentium 4, AMD Athlon, and Intel Atom. The desktops
were only upgraded a few weeks ago and are not used by me day-to-day,
but have not reported problems so far. I'll try to grab one and power
cycle it a bit to recreate the problem.

I suspect Scott James Remnant  is correct and this is an SMP problem.
Most machines built over the past few years have had multi-core CPUs.

-- 
system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-08-04 Thread John Edwards
Also effected a server that was upgraded from Ubuntu 8.04 - see comments 151, 
162 and 195:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/554172/comments/151
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/554172/comments/162
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/554172/comments/195

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-08-04 Thread John Edwards
The Dual CPU Pentium 3 server (see comment 151, 162 and 195) that has this 
problem has a very old ATI Rage chipset on the motherboard:

$ runlevel 
unknown
$ lspci | grep -i vga
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL AGP 2X (rev 27)


It does not enter runlevel 2 about 25% to 50% of the time. It does not
run X in any form, and would normally run postfix, apache, and slapd.
SSH is started by upstart but console logins are not.

Luckily it is semi-retired and currently only used as a test server.

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-07-30 Thread John Edwards
Robbie Williamson - I can confirm occasional problems entering runlevel
2 with the 2.6.32-24 kernel.


$ uname -a
Linux aa39.uk.fabit.net 2.6.32-24-generic-pae #38-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 5 
10:54:21 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux
$ runlevel 
unknown


This is on a Pentium 3 server with 1.2GB of RAM. The files in /etc/init/
do not have console output commented out, and ureadahead has not been
removed. Those are the two usual things I use to provide a fix to this
problem.

In this configuration the server fails to boot about 50% of the time.

I have attached the dmesg, output of 'ps auxwwf', meminfo, cpuinfo and
contents of /etc/init/. I hope this helps you find the problem. Let me
know if you need to test anything else.


** Attachment added: uname, runlevel, dmesg, output of 'ps auxwwf', meminfo, 
cpuinfo and contents of /etc/init/ for failed boot
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52735214/all

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 606630] Re: package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-07-17 Thread John Edwards
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 530832
   vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

-- 
package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 530832] Re: vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

2010-07-17 Thread John Edwards
Jean-Baptiste Lallement , can you explain why you think bug #606630 is
caused by this problem?

There are many reasons why the post installation script will error. You
need to look at it's output to find out what is causing this.

I am removing the duplicate flags until the error is shown to be the
same.

-- 
vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530832
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to vsftpd in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 606630] Re: package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:

2010-07-17 Thread John Edwards
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 530832
   vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

-- 
package vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/606630
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 530832] Re: vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group

2010-07-17 Thread John Edwards
Jean-Baptiste Lallement , can you explain why you think bug #606630 is
caused by this problem?

There are many reasons why the post installation script will error. You
need to look at it's output to find out what is causing this.

I am removing the duplicate flags until the error is shown to be the
same.

-- 
vsftpd 2.2.2-3ubuntu4 fails to upgrade because no ftp group
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530832
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-07-06 Thread John Edwards
I have tried booting my Pentium 3 server (see comment 151 and 157 above)
with both a generic and generic-pae, and both have problems entering run
level 2.

Closer inspection of the kernel messages shows that ureadahead,
plymouthd and init were being killed during boot by the kernel's out-of-
memory killer. I disabled ureadahead by deleting
/etc/init/ureadahead.conf and /etc/init/ureadahead-other.conf, and the
server has rebooted several times without problems.

The problem of ureadahead being out-of-memory could be related to bug #590963:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ureadahead/+bug/590963

I suspect that the init process being killed by the oom-killer is why
this server is not entering run level 2.

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-07-01 Thread John Edwards
I've upgraded about 20 machines from Ubuntu 8.04 to 10.04 and have only
seen this problem on one machine.

That was on a old Pentium 3 machine running a linux-generic kernel on
a 32-bit install. The other machines which do not show this problem were
either running a 64-bit install or a linux-generic-pae kernel. The
Nvidia drivers were not installed an any of them.

So has anyone seen it on a machine which is not a 32-bit install running
a generic (not generic-pae) kernel?

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 543506] Re: Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown

2010-07-01 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 554172 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172

I've upgraded about 20 machines from Ubuntu 8.04 to 10.04 and have only
seen this problem on one machine.

That was on a old Pentium 3 machine running a linux-generic kernel on
a 32-bit install. The other machines which do not show this problem were
either running a 64-bit install or a linux-generic-pae kernel.

So has anyone seen it on a machine which is not a 32-bit install running
a generic (not generic-pae) kernel?

-- 
Some services not started on boot, runlevel returns unknown
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543506
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-07-01 Thread John Edwards
For Mike Bianchi - what kernel was your 64-bit machine running? To find
out run 'uname -a' and post the output.

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 554172] Re: CUPS and other system services not starting at boot

2010-07-01 Thread John Edwards
Menno, it's not just CUPS. The server I met this problem with does not
even have CUPS installed.

If runlevel 2 is not entered then it is *all* services that are started
by rc scripts that fail. That is almost everything.

The only things that are running are udev, rsyslog and sshd. You don't
even get a login getty on the console. If sshd did not start for any
reason, then the machine would appear completely dead and you would have
to boot from a rescue CD (or similar). That's a bit difficult when the
server is in a data centre in a different city.

-- 
CUPS and other system services not starting at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554172
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 562121] Re: phpsysinfo static page requires the xsl extension

2010-04-17 Thread John Edwards
** Summary changed:

- phpsysInfo static page requires the xsl extension
+ phpsysinfo static page requires the xsl extension

-- 
phpsysinfo static page requires the xsl extension
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 562121] [NEW] phpsysInfo static page requires the xsl extension

2010-04-13 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: phpsysinfo

phpsysinfo package 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 on Ubuntu 10.04 beta (last update
08:25 GMT, 13 April 2010).

The default dynamic web page https://server-
name/phpsysinfo/index.php?disp=dynamic works fine

But the static version https://server-name/phpsysinfo/index.php?disp=static; 
displays only an error:

phpsysinfo
Error
FunctioncheckForExtensions/Function
Message
phpSysInfo requires the xsl extension to php in order to work properly.
/Message
/Error
/phpsysinfo


After installing the php5-xsl (and dependencies) the static page works
fine.

Could we add a dependency on php5-xsl to the phpsysinfo package?

** Affects: phpsysinfo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
phpsysInfo static page requires the xsl extension
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/562121
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 535185] Re: [FFE] Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3

2010-04-13 Thread John Edwards
Thanks for the fix. The new phpsysinfo package 3.0.4-0ubuntu2 fixes the
PHP errors

But there is a minor dependency problem where we now need php5-xsl package. See 
bug 562121
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/phpsysinfo/+bug/562121

-- 
[FFE] Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 551276] Re: apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled

2010-03-30 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm that 2.2.14-5ubuntu6 does not have this problems.

Thanks for fixing.

-- 
apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 551276] Re: apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled

2010-03-30 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm that 2.2.14-5ubuntu6 does not have this problems.

Thanks for fixing.

-- 
apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 551276] [NEW] apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled

2010-03-29 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apache2

Just upgraded to apache2 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 test machine running Ubuntu
10.04 and apache fails to start when the dav_fs module is enabled.


$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start
* Starting web server apache2
apache2: Syntax error on line 203 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on 
line 2 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav_fs.load: Cannot load 
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_fs.so into server: 
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_fs.so: undefined symbol: dav_file_mktemp
[fail]


** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 551276] [NEW] apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled

2010-03-29 Thread John Edwards
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: apache2

Just upgraded to apache2 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 test machine running Ubuntu
10.04 and apache fails to start when the dav_fs module is enabled.


$ sudo /etc/init.d/apache2 start
* Starting web server apache2
apache2: Syntax error on line 203 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on 
line 2 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/dav_fs.load: Cannot load 
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_fs.so into server: 
/usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_dav_fs.so: undefined symbol: dav_file_mktemp
[fail]


** Affects: apache2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
apache 2.2.14-5ubuntu4 fails to start with mod_dav_fs enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551276
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540214] Re: deprecated comment in imap.ini

2010-03-26 Thread John Edwards
The bug is actually in /etc/php5/conf.d/imap.ini, which is the file that
/etc/php5/cli/conf.d/imap.ini is linked to.

All this needs to be fixed is the comment character changed from '#' to
';'.

-- 
deprecated comment in imap.ini
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540214
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 540214] Re: deprecated comment in imap.ini

2010-03-26 Thread John Edwards
Here is the patch:
--- /etc/php5/conf.d/imap.ini.orig  2010-03-03 12:41:33.0 +
+++ /etc/php5/conf.d/imap.ini   2010-03-26 15:41:49.0 +
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-# configuration for php Imap module
+; configuration for php Imap module
 extension=imap.so


** Patch added: Patch to fix comment character in php5-imap ini file
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42064065/php5-imap-comment-fix.patch

** Changed in: php-imap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
deprecated comment in imap.ini
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540214
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 535185] Re: Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3

2010-03-24 Thread John Edwards
Not fixed.

I've tried the package version 3.0~rc6-1ubuntu1, but still meet the same
PHP errors.

The fix-php5.3-warnings fixes the split/explode functions in some PHP
files, but not those in the includes directory (eg the
common_functions.php file above).

The patch also does not fix the ereg functions, which are also dropped
in PHP 5.3.

These bugs are already fixed upstream in phpsysinfo release 3.0.4, see:
http://phpsysinfo.sourceforge.net/

I think it may be easier to move to this version than try to patch a
broken RC release.


** Changed in: phpsysinfo (Ubuntu Lucid)
   Status: Fix Released = Confirmed

-- 
Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 535185] Re: Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3

2010-03-23 Thread John Edwards
Adding to Ubuntu 10.04 server papercuts, as this package has zero
functionality without a fix and the fix is to move from an RC release to
a proper stable release.


** Also affects: server-papercuts
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
Web interface errors because split function deprecated in PHP 5.3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535185
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 538464] Re: clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete

2010-03-18 Thread John Edwards
Tomasz Kojm reports this is fixed in clamav:
  https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1883

Hopefully this will be in the next release for 0.96 (0.96rc2?).

-- 
clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538464
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 538464] Re: clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete

2010-03-18 Thread John Edwards
Tomasz Kojm reports this is fixed in clamav:
  https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1883

Hopefully this will be in the next release for 0.96 (0.96rc2?).

-- 
clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 man page incomplete
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538464
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 385758] Re: linux-image-virtual marked as server in GRUB menu

2010-03-17 Thread John Edwards
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 307924 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307924

Looks to be a duplicate of bug #307924 linux-image-2.6.27(-7)-virtual
contains server kernel.


** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 307924
   linux-image-2.6.27(-7)-virtual contains server kernel ...

-- 
linux-image-virtual marked as server in GRUB menu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385758
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 538417] Re: clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option

2010-03-15 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm that clamav-daemon package 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu2 fixes
this problem.

Thanks for the speedy fix.

-- 
clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to clamav in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 538417] Re: clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option

2010-03-15 Thread John Edwards
I can confirm that clamav-daemon package 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu2 fixes
this problem.

Thanks for the speedy fix.

-- 
clamav-daemon 0.96~rc1+dfsg-0ubuntu1 uses deprecated option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538417
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   >