[Bug 1772695] [NEW] missing package dependency on linux-image-extra-* / linux-image-generic
Public bug reported: Installing v4l2loopback-dkms in blank vagrant VM (or VM on cloud provider) creates a machine where v4l2loopback is installed by the required kernel module videodev.ko is not installed. dmseg shows missing symbols and the v4l2loopback module fails to load. The workaround is to "apt-get install linux-image-generic", as this will install the "linux-image-extra-*" package, which includes the videodev.ko module. This wasn't a problem with 16.04, quite likely because most VM images weren't as stripped down as they are today, and thus, always included linux-image-generic. It's probably reasonable to just make v4l2loopback-dkms depends on linux-image-generic. Note: This might seem like a corner case, but arguably v4l2loopback is often used for automated testing which often runs on VMs in the cloud. ** Affects: v4l2loopback (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: unmetdeps ** Description changed: - Installing v4l2loopback-dkms in blank vagrant VM (or VM on cloud provider) creates a machine - where v4l2loopback is installed by the required kernel module videodev.ko is not installed. + Installing v4l2loopback-dkms in blank vagrant VM (or VM on cloud + provider) creates a machine where v4l2loopback is installed by the + required kernel module videodev.ko is not installed. dmseg shows missing symbols and the v4l2loopback module fails to load. - The workaround is to "apt-get install linux-image-generic", as this will install - the "linux-image-extra-*" package, which includes the videodev.ko module. + The workaround is to "apt-get install linux-image-generic", as this will + install the "linux-image-extra-*" package, which includes the + videodev.ko module. - This wasn't a problem with 16.04, quite likely because most VM images weren't as stripped down - as they are today, and thus, always included linux-image-generic. + This wasn't a problem with 16.04, quite likely because most VM images + weren't as stripped down as they are today, and thus, always included + linux-image-generic. It's probably reasonable to just make v4l2loopback-dkms depends on linux-image-generic. - - Note: This might seem like a corner case, but arguably v4l2loopback is often used for automated - testing which often runs on VMs in the cloud. + Note: This might seem like a corner case, but arguably v4l2loopback is + often used for automated testing which often runs on VMs in the cloud. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1772695 Title: missing package dependency on linux-image-extra-* / linux-image- generic To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/v4l2loopback/+bug/1772695/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292231] Re: hgrc.d/cacerts.rc missing on amd64 (not i386) for saurcy+
For those running into this issue with hg, the workaround is: $ sudo echo -e '[web]\ncacerts = /etc/ssl/certs/ca-certificates.crt' /etc/mercurial/hgrc.d/cacerts.rc; Update: It appears the files moved to mercurial-common for trusty (and debian sid). http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/all/mercurial-common/filelist But this is no the case for ubuntu saurcy (13.10). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292231 Title: hgrc.d/cacerts.rc missing on amd64 (not i386) for saurcy+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/+bug/1292231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1292231] [NEW] hgrc.d/cacerts.rc missing on amd64 (not i386) for saurcy+
Public bug reported: Compare hg on amd64: http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/amd64/mercurial/filelist To hg on i386: http://packages.ubuntu.com/saucy/i386/mercurial/filelist You'll see that the files: /etc/mercurial/hgrc.d/cacerts.rc /etc/mercurial/hgrc.d/mergetools.rc Are missing from amd64, this is only the case for saurcy and trusty. Older packages has both these files in both i386 and amd64. I believe /etc/mercurial/hgrc.d/cacerts.rc is particularly important, as hg doesn't check HTTPS certificates without it. See, http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/CACertificates for details on ca-certs with hg. ** Affects: mercurial (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292231 Title: hgrc.d/cacerts.rc missing on amd64 (not i386) for saurcy+ To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mercurial/+bug/1292231/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 970589] Re: Unity loses drag and drop events during Unity panel fade
I can confirm this bug on both ATI and Intel (so I doubt this is releated to the graphics driver/card). Anyways, I recommend that we disabling this feature untill this is fixed. Highlighting icons is nice, but not at the expense of usuability. This bug is very bad, because users will experience that sometimes drag 'n' drop works, whilst other times it doesn't. The bug is consistent, but the user experience is not. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970589 Title: Unity loses drag and drop events during Unity panel fade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/970589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768143] Re: llvm-config is not in the package
I got llvm 3.0 installed, but it contains llvm-config-3.0, maybe there should be some update-alternatives magic, or something to decide which llvm-config version llvm-config should link to... I kind of think it's nice that we can have parallel installs of llvm, creating the link my self is no problem, just a bit ugly... Anyways, just my two cents, lot of projects use llvm-config, so having some way of choosing which to use, as in llvm-config-3.0 or llvm- config-2.8, etc... Might solve this issue... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768143 Title: llvm-config is not in the package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/llvm/+bug/768143/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862430] Re: window flicker for a short time after switching workspaces
The PPA works fine here too... However, it did reduce expo performance... Expo works fine with midmaps, but otherwise it not nice... Especially with 4x4 workspaces... However, if using midmaps for expo, a window (active or not) will not update untill it's reactivated even after leaving expo mode... Thus, activate expo midmaps, open terminal, ctrl + s (enter expo mode), hit enter (leave expo mode), click on the terminal again or try typing into it, the terminal window will not update. It'll first update when you select an other window and reselect the terminal. Also switching speeds appears to be affected, I needed to update compiz configs to get the same speed... Anyways, nice to see the flickering go, it is very noticable if you have more than 2x2 workspaces. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862430 Title: window flicker for a short time after switching workspaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/862430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862430] Re: window flicker for a short time after switching workspaces
Sorry, pl,ease disregard my comment about expo, seems a like a driver issue... Once loaded correctly, expo performance isn't bad with midmaps. However, midmaps enabled in expo still creates the issue mentioned (but I'm not sure if that's a regression). Again, sorry... I'll test better next time... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862430 Title: window flicker for a short time after switching workspaces To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz/+bug/862430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 979266] Re: Can't import GConf from gi.repository Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit
Do you have the gir1.2-gconf-2.0 package installed? (if not I suggest you try this) python-gconf doesn't provide the GConf-2.0.typelib in /usr/lib/girepository-1.0/, I guess python-gconf is another older binding. Anyways, installing gir1.2-gconf-2.0 fixed this for me. So if it fixes it for you it's probably a non-obvious dependency, as opposed to a bug. By the way, if you still have problems try installing gjs, and running something like: $ gjs imports.gi.GConf And see if that works... it might write some warnings, but should write [object GIRepositoryNamespace] some where. If nothing else, this will tell if it's a python specific bug... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/979266 Title: Can't import GConf from gi.repository Ubuntu 12.04 64-bit To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gobject-introspection/+bug/979266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637405] Re: Evince asks for samba authentication when it doesn't need to.
I don't think this is evince releated... Also if you, when adding the printer in system-config-printer - Add - Network printer - Windows Printer via Samba, choose Set authentication details now instead of Promt user if authentication is required, your password will be remembered... And if you're login details are wrong it will offer you the option of saving them... So it seems that the Promt user if authentication is required never allows the user to save the login credentials, this is inconsistent and doesn't really make sense... This is probably a bug in the part of gnome that manages printer authentication... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637405 Title: Evince asks for samba authentication when it doesn't need to. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637405] Re: Evince asks for samba authentication when it doesn't need to.
In case information is still missing I'll just provide a screenshot... The problem is that the user is not asked if the username/password should be saved... This is quite annoying when security policies requires that your password is 1/10 of a twitter-post :) - I hope someone can find a fix for this... //Regards Jonas Finnemann Jensen. ** Attachment added: Dialog, that doesn't ask if user credentials should be saved https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/637405/+attachment/1867205/+files/save-password-bug.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637405 Title: Evince asks for samba authentication when it doesn't need to. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 660969] Re: Can't tune in to last.fm due to markup parse error
Does this happen everytime you tune in ? -- Can't tune in to last.fm due to markup parse error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/660969 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584215] Re: thelastripper crashes on Tune in System.Net.WebException: Error getting response stream
As Hanky says this appears to be a mono related bug, the appropriate mono bugreport is: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506734 - Thanks Hank... ** Bug watch added: Novell/SUSE Bugzilla #506734 https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=506734 -- thelastripper crashes on Tune in System.Net.WebException: Error getting response stream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584215] Re: thelastripper crashes on Tune in System.Net.WebException: Error getting response stream
As former active TheLastRipper developer... I can confirm this bug... I've been getting mail from Windows users with the same problem... So it's probably not a .Net/mono issue. My guess is that last.fm did some redirects which TheLastRipper doesn't handle nicely... Anyway, I'll look into this as soon as I can find the time. -- thelastripper crashes on Tune in System.Net.WebException: Error getting response stream https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584215 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326087] Re: Shouldn't Configure key for SSH chmod 0644 autherized_keys?
SeaHorse 2.24.1 under Ubuntu 8.10, but I had a similar issue with Ubuntu 7.10, never resolved it, as I didn't try to chmod 0644 the file. Before chmod: jop...@dolomit:~/.ssh ls -@ -rw-rw-r-- 1 jopsen jopsen 407 Feb 12 12:36 authorized_keys After chmod: jop...@dolomit:~/.ssh chmod 0644 authorized_keys jop...@dolomit:~/.ssh ls -@ -rw-r--r-- 1 jopsen jopsen 407 Feb 12 12:36 authorized_keys I don't know if this is an issue specific to this SSH server, the configuration of this server or similar... I've not used SSH that much... -- Shouldn't Configure key for SSH chmod 0644 autherized_keys? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326087] [NEW] Shouldn't Configure key for SSH chmod 0644 autherized_keys?
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: seahorse I've used SeaHorse to export a public ssh key to a server running SunOS 5.9 with OpenSSH_3.1p1, I don't know exactly how the server was configured... But when I tried to connect the server afterwards using $ ssh server.address.com I was still promted for my password... However, if I logged on and chmod 0644 .ssh/autherized_keys then it would work fine next time I logged on... Shouldn't SeaHorse chmod 0644 the autherized_keys be default, when configuring a server to accept a public ssh key... I think ssh on the server refused to accept the public key because it did have the correct rights... By the way, I don't know if I'm reporting this the right place, or if this is a valid bug... If not just make it invalid... ** Affects: seahorse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Shouldn't Configure key for SSH chmod 0644 autherized_keys? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274405] Re: network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume
I have a similar issue using iwlagn it takes at least 30 seconds from resume to reconnect... Sometimes even from boot, if the wireless network wasn't up when the PC was started... By the way, I think it's a network manager issue, as it feels like it affects wired network too.. -- network manager slow to reconnect after suspend/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274405 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
