[Bug 565206] Re: Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6
Confirmed - a clear example of this is that SciDAVis in Lucid (beta2) crashes when adding a new column to a table. This crash has been traced to incompatibilities with libqtcore4 version 4.6 and above. The SciDAVis 0.2.4 release addresses this issue (among others) and so no longer crashes when performing this simple operation. ** Changed in: scidavis (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Please update to 0.2.4 as it fixes compatibility issues with qt 4.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/565206 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532732] Re: scidavis crashed with SIGSEGV in QHeaderView::sectionSizeFromContents()
This debdiff didn't solve the problem for me, still crashing if I try to create a new column in a table. It has changed slightly though, it used to hang for a second or two, and then crash, now it crashed instantly when I create the column. -- scidavis crashed with SIGSEGV in QHeaderView::sectionSizeFromContents() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 532732] Re: scidavis crashed with SIGSEGV in QHeaderView::sectionSizeFromContents()
Sorry, thought it was the same issue. So it's a qt issue, thanks. -- scidavis crashed with SIGSEGV in QHeaderView::sectionSizeFromContents() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532732 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287715] Re: Do not create CK sessions for cron and other system sessions
I have an upgraded Jaunty to Karmic - all updates - getting this bug: Output of ck-list-sessions: Session7: unix-user = '1000' realname = 'Musther' seat = 'Seat1' session-type = '' active = TRUE x11-display = ':0' x11-display-device = '/dev/tty7' display-device = '' remote-host-name = '' is-local = TRUE on-since = '2009-11-06T09:24:15.631854Z' login-session-id = '4294967295' Session1: unix-user = '113' realname = '(null)' seat = 'Seat1' session-type = '' active = FALSE x11-display = '' x11-display-device = '' display-device = '/dev/???' remote-host-name = '' is-local = TRUE on-since = '2009-11-06T09:11:33.149377Z' login-session-id = '4294967295' -- Do not create CK sessions for cron and other system sessions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 291214] Re: random freeze caused by wireless drivers?
There seem to be problems with ath/ath5k on specific hardware (maybe specific motherboard combinations?). My problem is intermittent freezes with no apparent cause, and nothing in the logs (took me ages to finally figure out it was the wifi). These two threads may provide more information: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1104824 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1146202 -- random freeze caused by wireless drivers? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/291214 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 366952] Re: Ubuntu 9.04 freezes when using rt kernel
My 9.04 system is up to date, and I'm on kernel 2.6.28-14. So is 2.6.29.4 in 9.10 or what? -- Ubuntu 9.04 freezes when using rt kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 290153] Re: Fails to find boot device in Intel D945Gnt
I had this issue a few months ago on 8.04, but was about to upgrade to 8.10 anyway, so did that. Haven't had a problem since until today. Interestingly, when I removed 'splash quiet' from the kernel line, the boot was normal. I'm thinking maybe s short rootdelay will do the trick for me, will try that anyway. -- Fails to find boot device in Intel D945Gnt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321992] [NEW] Evolution Date Format Inconsistent.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution Ubuntu 8.10 In Evolution, when I create a task the start and end date fields work correctly for me (in New Zealand), displaying the date in the format dd/mm/yy (so today is 28/01/09). However, after creating the task, when I click on it and the details appear in the lower section, the start and due date are in the US formate mm/dd/yy (so today is 01/28/09). I'm pretty sure my locale settings are correct - all other programs seem to show the correct date format (just tested in OOo and F-spot - both fine). ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Evolution Date Format Inconsistent. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 321992] Re: Evolution Date Format Inconsistent.
This bug is NOT a duplicate of #316337: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+bug/316337 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 316337 Generated m4a files for mtp device don't play on device -- Evolution Date Format Inconsistent. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321992 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32089] Re: Non-i18n date formatting in Evolution time edit fields
Confirmed: On Intrepid - 8.10 I'm in New Zealand, so using English - but have the date format issue: When creating a task, I specify the date in dd/mm/yy format, which works - but when viewing tasks, the dates are displayed as mm/dd/yy - this is very confusing. -- Non-i18n date formatting in Evolution time edit fields https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32089 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316737] [NEW] Create launcher - type location - cannot set location
Public bug reported: When trying to create a launcher to open a location: - Create launcher - In type, select location - Enter a name - Click browse Now, when selecting a directory/folder, the only available option is open, which opens the directory rather than selecting it and entering the path in the 'Location' box. This effectively makes it impossible to create a launcher to a location in this manner. If the user types the path into the 'location' box, eg '/etc/myapp/directory' and then saves the launcher, the resulting launcher does work, so the problem is only with the browsing for the location in order to create the launcher. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Create launcher - type location - cannot set location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316737 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315725] Re: Menu launcher not created when Slingshot installed.
Great. Has this been commited? Cheers! -- Menu launcher not created when Slingshot installed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 315725] [NEW] Menu launcher not created when Slingshot installed.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: slingshot When installing this package (slingshot), no menu entry is created - the game does include a menu icon, and a .desktop file. ** Affects: slingshot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Menu launcher not created when Slingshot installed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/315725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303536] Re: Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media
Status has been changed to 'fix released' what package version carries the fix? Thanks -- Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303536] [NEW] Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brasero First noticed this bug on 8.04, still present in 8.10. Brasero reports: Insufficient space on media (0 available for 357796). The log is attached. This bug occurs consistently when attempting to burn audio CD's, but in the latest instance, I was trying to burn a CD image. To reproduce, try to burn an audio CD with one short track. ** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 303536] Re: Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media
** Attachment added: brasero-session.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20059833/brasero-session.log -- Brasero - wrongly reports insufficient space on media https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303536 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 217580] Re: Slow performance with Gmail
Confirmed - 8.04 i386 -- Slow performance with Gmail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217580 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225568] Re: OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files.
I finally tracked down somebody with MS Office 2007, he got this message when trying to open the file: This file was created in a pre-release version of Word 2007 and cannot be opened in this version. Seriously, this OOXML joke-standard is... well... a joke, but a bad joke at that. -- OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225568] [NEW] OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org When trying to open a Microsoft OOXML file (eg a .docx file), OpenOffice.org crashes every time with the error: Due to an unexpected error, OpenOffice.org crashed. All the files you were working on will be. etc The file I'm trying to open is not listed in the files that are to be recovered. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225568] Re: OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files.
Actually no, I thought it was, but got somebody to send me another docx, which was fine, so attached is the offending file. ** Attachment added: Office Open XML sample.docx http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14095100/Office%20Open%20XML%20sample.docx -- OpenOffice.org 2.4 (in Hardy) crashes on opening OOXML files. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225568 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128320] Re: [gutsy] special keys on laptop don't work on Toshiba Satellite A105
Mine are all working now (Hardy - Toshiba A100). -- [gutsy] special keys on laptop don't work on Toshiba Satellite A105 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 38303] Re: no visible indication that a long-running fsck is taking place in background
AutoFsck moves the periodic fsck to shutdown, and checks with the user whether it's a good time to run. http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck -- no visible indication that a long-running fsck is taking place in background https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/38303 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 65683] Re: Unable to cancel a fsck
Try: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck -- Unable to cancel a fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65683 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176727] Re: Blinking cursor replaces splash screen when fsck runs at boot
To make fsck run at boot time, open a terminal and run: sudo touch /forcefsck Then reboot. You may be interested in: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck -- Blinking cursor replaces splash screen when fsck runs at boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3581] Re: New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count
I was wondering if solving the problem was worth while, or whether we'd be better of just scrapping the check altogether, so a while ago I asked a couple of ext3 devs: Does fsck need to be run on ext3 partitions? Andrew Morton: Theoretically: no. Practically: yes. There are software bugs and hardware bugs and things can go wrong on-disk. You want to catch them early. Personally I disable the auto-fsck thing and I'll run fsck manually once or twice a year, when the time suits me. Mingming Cao: Periodically fsck ext3 is still needed, even if ext3 is a journalled fs. kernel code vm/fs could be buggy, or disks IO errors, which cause filesystem metadata corrupted silently, this can't be detected by simply replaying the journal log. Well how often should ext3 do the sanity check is really depend on the customer's priority, whether they would like to trade some of the boot up time with more confident of the fs's healthy. It's probably a good idea to warning the user that the scheduled fsck is coming and let user to decide whether they want to do it or delaying it. -- New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3581] Re: New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count
Using the -n switch, fsck can check a mounted filesystem (-n tells it not to make any changes, so it wont do any repairs). So the quick way to implement this would be to have a scheduled 'fsck -n', if it comes back clean, fine, if it comes back dirty, schedule a full check to run (on shutdown, with a note in the logout/shutdown dialogue?). That should be quicker and easier to implement than writing the errors to a log for quick fixing. Mark, are you wanting this for Hardy, or Hardy+? -- New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3581] Re: New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count
Of course I started fiddling with the aim of throwing together something that could do that, but found a problem. I ran fsck with -n on my root partition, it said there was an inode problem, so I touched /forcefsck and rebooted to run a full fsck. After rebooting I ran fsck -n again to see what it would tell me, unfortunately I now had more problems than I had the first time, lots of: Free blocks count wrong for group #10 (19891, counted=19838). and Free inodes count wrong for group #10 (16186, counted=16187). type errors. I also did the same with a different disk, and got the same issue. So it seems that ext3 always has inode and block count issues, making my suggestion of running a full fsck when errors are found with a read only one, unworkable. -- New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3581] Re: New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count
I've done some research, and there's no way to use fsck (well, we're really looking at e2fsck here) in the targeted manner you described - that's not to say it can't be done, just that it can't be done with the current e2fsck, we'll need a rewrite, or a new tool altogether. That's beyond my skills ;-) -- New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151019] Re: [needs-packaging] Slingshot
Source is available at: http://www.slingshot-game.org/Downloads -- [needs-packaging] Slingshot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 177542] fsck should not run at boot periodically!
Public bug reported: fsck should not run at boot periodically! This is a major usability issue, especially on laptops, but to a large extent on laptops too. This problem can, and to some extent has been solved: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/prompt-for-fsck-on-shutdown Any usability issue such as this is a large contributing factor to But #1 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- fsck should not run at boot periodically! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/177542 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152504] Re: system-config-printer won't accept password
I've tested on a number of machines, and virtual machines, same problem every time. It's amazing to me that this hasn't been reported more. -- system-config-printer won't accept password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152504] Re: system-config-printer won't accept password
I'm away from home for about a month now, the laptop doesn't have any printers set up on it so I can't test anything. If I can get hold of a printer I'll try it though. From what I recall I was asked for a password every time I tried to change any global settings, changing printer drivers, default media, access times etc. -- system-config-printer won't accept password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151446] Re: [needs-packaging] AutoFsck
Attached is version 3.1 which I haven't actually released a packaged version of. It's got a couple of bug fixes from version 3.0. There's a file called 'packaging instructions' which should contain everything any packager needs to know. ** Attachment added: AutoFsck v3.1.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10673319/AutoFsck%20v3.1.tar.gz -- [needs-packaging] AutoFsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152504] Re: system-config-printer won't accept password
I can confirm that this problem happens whatever the password is. I really can't believe we're the only two people having this problem, it seems to happen on Gutsy on any machine. -- system-config-printer won't accept password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59695] Re: High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 17216 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17216 Just thought I'd mention that this problem isn't only when running on battery, on my Toshiba A100 the load unload cycle count is increasing madly, 30-50 in just 5 minutes. This really isn't good. -- High frequency of load/unload cycles on some hard disks may shorten lifetime https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 22460] Re: Should be warned of upcoming forced fsck
Try AutoFsck: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck It basically moves this automated 'just in case' check to shutdown and gives you the option not to run it if it's a bad time. There's also a nice simple script (with zenity GUI) on that page which allows you to easily change the interval. -- Should be warned of upcoming forced fsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22460 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 3581] Re: New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count
I know AutoFsck was mentioned already, but I think it's worth mentioning with regard to the last comment. AutoFsck doesn't interfere with the start up check (if it's called for some reason, it'll still run), and prompts the user on shutdown (no user confirmation, no check run), which means it doesn't cause problems with things like UPS initiated shutdowns or low battery shutdowns. You can find it at: http://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck There's also a nice simple script (with zenity GUI) on that page which allows you to easily change the interval. -- New ext3 partitions should not have max-mount count https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3581 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 153508] GUTSY - networking stops working after suspend
Public bug reported: Network stops working after a suspend to RAM, both wired and wireless. Disabling and re-enabling with network manager doesn't fix it, but after restarting it's back to normal. Using Gutsy Beta (T -1 days) on my Toshiba A100 laptop. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- GUTSY - networking stops working after suspend https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153508 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 128320] Re: [gutsy] special keys on laptop don't work on Toshiba Satellite A105
Same problem on my A100/E, worked in Feisty. -- [gutsy] special keys on laptop don't work on Toshiba Satellite A105 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128320 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152459] Brightness on Toshiba laptop display - jumpy
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22 On my Toshiba A100, when I try to change the brightness in Gutsy's power management dialogue, the display flickers between two states (bright and dim). THe same behaviour occurs on battery or mains power, but the bright and dim are both brighter on mains. On mains I have the choice of bright and dim, with bright being at the 100% mark. On battery I have the choice of bright or dim (but both are dimmer than on mains), and the bright spot is around 70% on the slider. ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.22 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Brightness on Toshiba laptop display - jumpy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152459 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152504] Re: system-config-printer won't accept password
system-config-printer version 0.7.75+svn1653-0ubuntu2 -- system-config-printer won't accept password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 152504] system-config-printer won't accept password
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: system-config-printer When I make changes to a printer through system-config-printer as an admin user, I am asked for my password when I try to apply the changes. When I enter my password, I'm quickly prompted again as if the password was incorrect, and have to eventually hit cancel. I suspect the problem is because I have a very secure password which is 16 characters and includes symbols, I believe that the problem is probably with one or more of the symbols. My password includes some of the following (don't know which are causing the problem): [EMAIL PROTECTED]*(),.';: It also contains numbers and upper and lower case letters. One fix would simply be to call system-config-printer via gksu which neatly bypasses this problem (although of course requiring root password to even view). ** Affects: system-config-printer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- system-config-printer won't accept password https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151446] [needs-packaging] AutoFsck
Public bug reported: AutoFsck is a script to move the automatic 'just-in-case' fsck (every 30 boots or so) from boot to shutdown, it also asks if it is a convenient time to run the check. See the wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/AutoFsck From the wiki page you can download either a .deb or the script itself. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging ** Tags added: needs-packaging -- [needs-packaging] AutoFsck https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151446 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 151019] Slingshot needs-packaging
Public bug reported: I've had a *lot* of requests to get Slingshot (http://www.slingshot- game.org) into the Ubuntu universe, hence this but report. At the official downloads page, there is a package for Ubuntu, although not being a packaging guru I'm not sure if its 'correctness'. http://www.slingshot-game.org/Downloads Please contact me if you need any further info on the game itself. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: needs-packaging -- Slingshot needs-packaging https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110211] Re: Feisty: No longer prompts for emtying trash on eject.
It's fine now, it started working after an update about a month after the Feisty release. -- Feisty: No longer prompts for emtying trash on eject. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 90513] Re: weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation
Interesting, so is there anything else we can do, apart from bump the ubuntu bug report? Jon On 5/19/07, Stephen Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think it's an upstream bug, either. When I posted this problem on OOo forums, no one else was having the issue. They recommended I delete the Ubuntu version of OOo and install the OEM version directly from OOo. When I did, the bug went away. So, it's pretty clear that the bug was somehow introduced by Ubuntu. -- weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90513 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 90513] Re: weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation
No, that doesn't seem to be a duplicate. I would report it at openoffice.org, but I think it's a bug in Ubuntu's OOo packages, not OOo itself, so doesn't that make it an Ubuntu issue? Jon On 5/19/07, Simos Xenitellis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To get this bug fixed, it has to be reported upstream at www.openoffice.org (as an issue), then linked here (there is a facility for this with Also Affects Upstream). Is the following https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/115226 a duplicate? -- weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90513 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 90513] Re: weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation
I think everyone should be satisfied that this bug is confirmed, but has anyone made any progress with a fix, it's really annoying? -- weird document recovery attempt of openoffice after fullscreen slideshow with oo presentation https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/90513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112924] Re: Firestarter deamon doesn't start on boot
This bug has been confirmed over and over again in the forums: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=431544 ** Changed in: firestarter (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Firestarter deamon doesn't start on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 112924] Firestarter deamon doesn't start on boot
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firestarter Firestarter (when installed from the repos) doesn't correctly start the deamon on system boot. I believe it is because the network connections have not been set up by network manager by the time the firestarter.sh script is called. Commenting out: if [ $MASK = -a $1 != stop ]; then echo External network device $IF is not ready. Aborting.. exit 2 fi from the file /etc/firestarter/firestarter.sh fixes the issue. ** Affects: firestarter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Firestarter deamon doesn't start on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112924 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110211] Feisty: No longer prompts for emtying trash on eject.
Public bug reported: In feisty beta, when ejecting a removable drive (such as a USB flash drive) the user was prompted to empty the trash if there was anything in it. This no longer happens in Feisty final. I'm not sure if this is a bug, but if this feature was intentionally removed nobody on the forums knows, and nobody knows why, or if it will be reintroduced in Gutsy, so I have to assume that it may be a bug - please correct me if I'm wrong. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Feisty: No longer prompts for emtying trash on eject. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110211 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
I've changed my drive configuration, now it works, but of course the bug is still a problem. I change my drive configuration to: Pri-master - my first hard drive 40gb Pri-slave - my second hard drive 250gb Sec-master - CD-RW/DVD-ROM Sec-slave -CD-RW/DVD-RW The problem seems to be only when an optical drive and a hard drive are on the same IDE channel. -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
Ok, here's what you asked for, this is with the original feisty- generated fstab: Linux dominus 2.6.20-14-generic #2 SMP Mon Apr 2 20:37:49 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Attachment added: dmesg.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7351543/dmesg.log -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
** Attachment added: lspci-vvnn.log http://librarian.launchpad.net/7355675/lspci-vvnn.log -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
I've just installed the Feisty final release on exactly the same setup, and all seems to be working now, even gnomebaker, so I'll close this bug. -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
Closed as all seems to be fixed in Feisty final. ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Needs Info = Rejected -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
Everything was working with feisty final, but after rebooting a couple of times, it's not, one of my drives is no longer visible. Here's the info you requested from this system: Linux dominus 2.6.20-15-generic #2 SMP Sun Apr 15 07:36:31 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Status: Rejected = Needs Info -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Re: Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
... and the logs ** Attachment added: logs.tar.gz http://librarian.launchpad.net/7359904/logs.tar.gz -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106918] Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata
Public bug reported: My optical drives do not work correctly in feisty, that is they're not both visible, my setup is: Pri-Master - hda 40gb (has hda1 as swap and hda2 as /) Pri-Slave - hdb CD-RW/DVD-ROM Sec-Master - hdc 250gb (has hdca as /home) Sec-Slave - hdd CD-RW/DVD-RW And the feisty generated fstab reads: # file system mount point type options dump pass proc /proc proc defaults 0 0 # /dev/sda2 UUID=817212c9-5326-4564-a922-02c968ff03ae / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /dev/sdb1 UUID=43ebc5ff-f943-4fae-b230-6b13fc316b72 /home ext3 defaults 0 2 # /dev/sda1 UUID=fb339463-7add-4014-b675-aa9ecfd1fac0 none swap sw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/scd1 /media/cdrom1 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/fd0 /media/floppy0 auto rw,user,noauto 0 0 After the install, only /dev/hdb was working, /dev/hdd was not. I changed the lines '/dev/scd0' and '/dev/scd1' to their '/dev/hd' equivalents, which again rendered them usable. In both configurations I cannot write or blank disks with gnomebaker I get the same error as this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnomebaker/+bug/97312 I'm sure I read a bug saying there were issues if you had a hard drive and an optical drive on the same IDE channel, but I can't find the bug now. Possible this issue is due to libata migration as per the response to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/106100 ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Feisty: optical drives not working, possibly due to libata https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106918 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 106100] Feisty: Incorrectly identifies hd as sd (eg hda1 - sda1)
Public bug reported: Feisty has my standard IDE drives (usually hda and hdc) listed as sda and sdb. My arrangement is usually (or should be): Pri-Master - hda 40gb (has hda1 as swap and hda2 as /) Pri-Slave - hdb CD-RW/DVD-ROM Sec-Master - hdc 250gb (has hdca as /home) Sec-Slave - hdd CD-RW/DVD-RW Feisty created my /etc/fstab as follows: # file system mount point type options dump pass proc/proc procdefaults0 0 # /dev/sda2 UUID=817212c9-5326-4564-a922-02c968ff03ae / ext3 defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 # /dev/sdb1 UUID=43ebc5ff-f943-4fae-b230-6b13fc316b72 /home ext3defaults 0 2 # /dev/sda1 UUID=fb339463-7add-4014-b675-aa9ecfd1fac0 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/scd0 /media/cdrom0 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/scd1 /media/cdrom1 udf,iso9660 user,noauto 0 0 /dev/fd0/media/floppy0 autorw,user,noauto 0 0 Oddly this seems to be working as far as my hard drives are concerned, but my optical drives do all kinds of odd things, sometimes visible, sometimes not, sometimes they'll mount, sometimes not, sometimes they'll burn, sometimes not. I did change my fstab to reflect the 'correct' configuration, and it worked (about a week ago), but since installing the latest updates it doesn't. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Feisty: Incorrectly identifies hd as sd (eg hda1 - sda1) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106100 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97312] Re: Cannot open SCSI driver! while attempting to blank a cdrw (feisty beta)
I confirm the same with GnomeBaker. Additionally I can't write CD's with it, but can use the nautilus CD writer. ** Changed in: gnomebaker (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: k3b = gnomebaker Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Cannot open SCSI driver! while attempting to blank a cdrw (feisty beta) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97312 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104602] root password visible at emergency console
Public bug reported: If boot fails (for example e2fsck can't deal with a partition) the user is given the option to continue by pressing Control+D, or to enter the root password for an emergency console. If the password is entered, it is visible, ie it is not starred or blocked out, or simply invisible as usual. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- root password visible at emergency console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 104602] Re: root password visible at emergency console
Ubuntu 7.04 latest updates. -- root password visible at emergency console https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104602 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 102810] Re: bug in the web address of the bug report tool
Bug confirmed in feisty x86 -- bug in the web address of the bug report tool https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102810 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103144] scripts running from desktop : $PWD = /home/user
Public bug reported: When I run a script from the desktop, it thinks it's running in /home/user rather than /home/user/Desktop For example the following: #!/bin/bash zenity --info --text=$PWD exit in a file /home/musther/Desktop/test executed graphically (double click) on the desktop and hit run or 'run in terminal', gives the output '/home/musther' rather than '/home/musther/Desktop' If run from the command line, the correct output is given, ie the directory from which it is run. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Apr 5 14:38:59 2007 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 7.04 Uname: Linux dominus 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 i686 GNU/Linux ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- scripts running from desktop : $PWD = /home/user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103144] Re: scripts running from desktop : $PWD = /home/user
Sorry, perhaps I didn't explain it clearly enough. This only happens in ~/Desktop, if you copy the same test script to ~/Desktop/test and run it, you'll get the expected output - '/home/user/Desktop/test'. I don't know why it only happens on the desktop (ie in the Desktop folder), but it does. -- scripts running from desktop : $PWD = /home/user https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103144 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
