[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
Please stop promoting snap. I and a lot of people are not going to use it. Snap is not unix-wayish, it is Windows-bloated-wayish. A big step back and complete garbage. The same way flatpak and appimage and docker- container-as-a-unit-of-software are. I have almost created a script that patches the binary installation in order to workaround Mozilla's sabotage (I have never tested that the method works though, but I guess it should). When finished, I gonna create a binary package with triggers to patch firefox on installation. The only missing ingridient is the python library for editing zip archive in place (because I don't want to unpack and repack the whole archive just to patch 1 small JS file). Since it is a complex task, I just followed the way of creating a ctypes-based bindings for a C library for manipulating zip archives. It is here https://github.com/KOLANICH-libs/libzip.py in an unfinished unworking state (well, ctypes part works, but we need to wrap it properly in an interface similar to ZipArchive to be a kinda drop-in replacement, or maybe even promote it into the stdlib). I currently have no time to work on it. Help is welcome. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956165] [NEW] Mere presence of WLAN_AKM_SUITE_PSK_SHA256 cipher suite disrupts connection
Public bug reported: I have tried to port support from brcm80211, but haven't succeed. Here is my draft. It is based on https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/fc02cb2b37fe2cbf1d3334b9f0f0eab9431766c4/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c and https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/5bfc75d92efd494db37f5c4c173d3639d4772966/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/include/brcmu_wifi.h It is likely that some code additions in other places are needed, but since I haven't found the analogous places, I guess they can be within chip firmware. ** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "it does not work" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956165/+attachment/5550592/+files/0003-Trying-to-implement-cyphersuites-support.-Not-working.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956165 Title: Mere presence of WLAN_AKM_SUITE_PSK_SHA256 cipher suite disrupts connection To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1956165/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956162] Re: Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076)
** Description changed:
>Problem: error `ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group
(1027076)`
- Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message
- to be emitted. The problem is not within cipher group (that is supported
- WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP).
+ 1. Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading
+ message to be emitted. The problem is not within cipher group (that is
+ supported WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP).
```patch
- WL_ERR(("invalid cipher group (%d)\n",
sme->crypto.cipher_group));
+ WL_ERR(("invalid akm suite (%d)\n",
sme->crypto.akm_suites[0]));
```
+
+ 2. Once we fix the error-reporting logic we get the correct error
+ message:
+
+ > ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid akm suite (1027078)
+
+ It is because that case (WLAN_AKM_SUITE_PSK_SHA256) is not processed.
+ Even the mere presence of it in announced cipher suites is enough to
+ break wifi. Not only for this driver, but also for drivers for Windows.
+
+ I have ported processing of the cases from the open-source driver, but
+ it still doesn't work and causes errors in kernel. Likely it requires
+ some code in other places, maybe even in firmware.
+
+ `wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK WPA-PSK-SHA256` in `hostapd` config (currently it
+ is defaults on OpenWRT).
+
+ The OpenWRT wiki is incorrect, in `/etc/config/wireless` `ieee80211w=1`
+ is the default, which causes `wpa_key_mgmt` be generated so.
+
+ `wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK SAE` in `hostapd` config works fine (if these
+ shitty crashing drivers can be called working fine).
+
+ To make it so, explicitly set `ieee80211w=0` in `/etc/config/wireless`.
+
+ So the second patch just gives the explanination to the user what
+ happens and the instructions on what to fix in his router configuration
+ as a workaround.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956162
Title:
Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message
to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1956162/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956162] [NEW] Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076)
Public bug reported:
>Problem: error `ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group
(1027076)`
1. Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading
message to be emitted. The problem is not within cipher group (that is
supported WLAN_CIPHER_SUITE_CCMP).
```patch
- WL_ERR(("invalid cipher group (%d)\n",
sme->crypto.cipher_group));
+ WL_ERR(("invalid akm suite (%d)\n",
sme->crypto.akm_suites[0]));
```
2. Once we fix the error-reporting logic we get the correct error
message:
> ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid akm suite (1027078)
It is because that case (WLAN_AKM_SUITE_PSK_SHA256) is not processed.
Even the mere presence of it in announced cipher suites is enough to
break wifi. Not only for this driver, but also for drivers for Windows.
I have ported processing of the cases from the open-source driver, but
it still doesn't work and causes errors in kernel. Likely it requires
some code in other places, maybe even in firmware.
`wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK WPA-PSK-SHA256` in `hostapd` config (currently it
is defaults on OpenWRT).
The OpenWRT wiki is incorrect, in `/etc/config/wireless` `ieee80211w=1`
is the default, which causes `wpa_key_mgmt` be generated so.
`wpa_key_mgmt=WPA-PSK SAE` in `hostapd` config works fine (if these
shitty crashing drivers can be called working fine).
To make it so, explicitly set `ieee80211w=0` in `/etc/config/wireless`.
So the second patch just gives the explanination to the user what
happens and the instructions on what to fix in his router configuration
as a workaround.
** Affects: bcmwl (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Patch added:
"0001-Fixed-error-reporting-ported-from-the-recent-version.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956162/+attachment/5550587/+files/0001-Fixed-error-reporting-ported-from-the-recent-version.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956162
Title:
Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message
to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1956162/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1956162] Re: Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076)
** Patch added: "0002-A-bit-more-useful-error-message-for-the-case-of-PSK-SHA256.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1956162/+attachment/5550591/+files/0002-A-bit-more-useful-error-message-for-the-case-of-PSK-SHA256.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956162 Title: Logic errors in error-reporting code cause a highly misleading message to be emitted: ERROR @wl_set_key_mgmt : invalid cipher group (1027076) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bcmwl/+bug/1956162/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1515125] Re: Ability to install Firefox Developer Edition on Ubuntu together with stable release
Added a Debian bug. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002959 . ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1002959 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002959 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515125 Title: Ability to install Firefox Developer Edition on Ubuntu together with stable release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1515125/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
>MOZ_REQUIRE_SIGNING is a security measure to prevent users from running unsigned (and potentially damaging) extensions, while I understand your use case it is not reasonable to suggest turning it off by default for all Ubuntu users. If I remember right, it was a consensus that the policy of enforcement of Mozilla policy applies only to builds for Linux built by Mozilla itself, and distros were free to not to enforce Mozilla policy. It may make sense to rename the package back into iceweasel and not to be bound by Mozilla harmful policy. The usage of the name "Firefox" is less valuable than the ability to customize the browser as we wish. It is absolutely humilating that there is a need to get Mozilla approval in order to do on our computers what we want and need to do. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1937343] Re: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions
Added a Debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002957 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1002957 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1002957 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937343 Title: FireFox 90 unable to install unsigned webextensions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1937343/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945950] Re: Enable WebExtensions Experiments in the packages
>why do you think the Ubuntu package should enable it? GNU/Linux is a free software ecosystem, and reserving certain features for exclusive use of the monopolyst is not freedom. I have developed 3 addons which would likely highly disapproved by Mozilla (in fact, they have disabled `about:config` in their Fenix ans I remember several that several times Mozilla employees were posting comments on their Bugzilla in favour of phasing out about:config). 1. An extension exposing the API to manipulate about:config prefs to other WebExtensions. Like in old good XPCOM exts times. This API was trivial to implement, but Mozilla hasn't implemented it on purpose. https://github.com/KOLANICH-WebExts/experiment-config.xpi/tree/master/experiment 2. A WebExtension to semi-automatically apply prefs from Arkenfox - a set of Firefox settings intended to improve security and privacy. I guess it was the real rationale about non-exposing the API, because extensions like this one would make disabling some antifeatures (i.e. telemetry, i.e. disallowing privacy preserving exts (ΝoScript, μMatrix, μBΟ, Canvas Blocker) operation on Mozilla own websites, ads built into the browser...) introduced and enabled by default by Mozilla easier. https://github.com/KOLANICH-WebExts/experiment-config.xpi/tree/master/arkenfox 3. An extension exposing the API to parse JavaScript source into AST. Of course, one can use some existing pure JS parser (the AST format of SpiderMonkey has become a de-facto standard for JS AST and pure JS libs (and their python ports) parse into the same objects hierarchy), but it is a big maintainment issue (one has to keep these stuff upgraded as JS gets new features. The parser within Firefox upgrades with Firefox.) It is also a performance and bloat issue. The excuse they have given about not exposing it is that they want to be free to change it as they wish. IMHO - it is not an excuse, they can just expose that and document that they don't guarantee that it is stable, and let the devs to decide which is more suitable for them. https://github.com/KOLANICH-WebExts/experiment-parse.xpi >Do you know of the rational for upstream to not enable it? Mozilla's rationale is that Firefox is their brand and they don't want users to be able to disrupt the browser operation and then blame Mozilla. They have named the same rationale for not allowing unsigned addons. For Windows they provide some unbranded installers where signing can be made non-mandatory, also in the branded Developers` Edition these prefs work (on Windows machines I use D. E. exclusively). But on Linux platform they have ceased to pursue signing in release builds pretty long ago (though IDK if they have continued and if it was the cause of https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945947, or if it was just some change in the code of fx that just broke the patches. I have googled the news and found nothing, searching in commit logs in Debian repo also has resulted in nothing.) I **hypothesize** it is because they have very low market share, and if Linux distros would report IceWeasel instead of Firefox, it would cause their browser share further be dropped, and so the revenues search engines pay them. So I **guess** they are not currently in position to dispute allowing unsigned addons and Mozilla- monopolized features in the builds built by distros, because if they insist, the distros instead of satisfying Mozilla ultimatum can just say "OK, we just rebrand back to Iceweasel", and this would harm Mozilla more than the distros. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945950 Title: Enable WebExtensions Experiments in the packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1945950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945947] Re: xpinstall.signatures.required no longer works
>which Ubuntu release Kubuntu `impish` >and firefox version 93.0+build1-0ubuntu2 (the one latest in impish at the moment) But the issue has appeared in `hirsute` somewhen this spring, it is I have just reported it. >Could you exact steps to trigger the problem you describe, what did you try to install and what error did you get? 0. ensure that mandatory signing of addons is disabled by going to `about:config` and ensuring `xpinstall.signatures.required` is set to `false` 1. build a custom addon from source on GitHub 2. don't send it to Mozilla's service for signing 3. install it 4. The browser will force-disable the addon without a possibility to enable it. It will give you the following link https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/add-on-signing-in-firefox -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945947 Title: xpinstall.signatures.required no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1945947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945950] [NEW] Enable WebExtensions Experiments in the packages
Public bug reported: WebExtensions Experiments allow developers to access functionality that Mozilla reserves for itself since XPCOM extensions killing. They allow develepers to implement an own WebExtensions API. It is not available in usual firefox versions and have to be enabled hoth during build (MOZ_DEV_EDITION) and in about:config (extensions.experiments.enabled). It is proposed to enable the needed macrodef, and maybe even an about:config pref. The long-ignored Debian bug https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=970765 ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945950 Title: Enable WebExtensions Experiments in the packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1945950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945947] [NEW] xpinstall.signatures.required no longer works
Public bug reported: `xpinstall.signatures.required` used to be working for allowing addons not signed by Mozilla to be installed into release builds of Firefox from Ubuntu packages (it doesn't work for release builds of Firefox for Windows because of Mozilla policy, but linux distros used to be applying patches and using the right defines at compile time to fix that), but it is no longer the case. I'd also be fine to know what has caused that. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945947 Title: xpinstall.signatures.required no longer works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/1945947/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945289] [NEW] Failed to properly resume from S3 (suspend-to-ram) on kernel version 5.13.0-16 (installed while updating to impish), amdgpu driver.
Public bug reported: On 5.11.0 everything is OK. The GPU is AMD Carrizo APU. ** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 5.13.0 amdgpu carrizo impish ** Summary changed: - Failed to properly resume from S3 (suspend-to-ram) on kernel version 5.13.0-16, amdgpu driver. + Failed to properly resume from S3 (suspend-to-ram) on kernel version 5.13.0-16 (installed while updating to impish), amdgpu driver. ** Tags added: impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945289 Title: Failed to properly resume from S3 (suspend-to-ram) on kernel version 5.13.0-16 (installed while updating to impish), amdgpu driver. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/1945289/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922589] [NEW] Color profiles are not loaded in Hirsute (on both X11 and Wayland)
Public bug reported: 1. There is a laptop. 2. Laptops matrices usually have very skewed colors, i.e. #D9DAC6 looks like bluish-gray instead of orangish-brown without loading a correct icc profile. So this issue is of high importance. 3. Usually the issue was solved by extracting an icc from edid, and uskng it. The file is attached. 4. After upgrading to Hirsute the profile has stopped being applied. 5. Tried to apply manually. * `xcalib` "succeeds", but there is no effect * `colord-kde` - in GUI looks like success, but no effect * `Dispwin: Error - File '/edid-97542261df88ff2134c8e0630e62c43b.icc' is not a valid ICC profile or Argyll .cal file` ** Affects: colord (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: edid ** Attachment added: "The icc file generated from EDID" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922589/+attachment/5484346/+files/edid-97542261df88ff2134c8e0630e62c43b.icc -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922589 Title: Color profiles are not loaded in Hirsute (on both X11 and Wayland) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1922589/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1922587] [NEW] Black rectangles and lot of non-working things in Hirsute because of libqt5quick5-gles on AMD GPUs
Public bug reported: Sympthoms: https://old.reddit.com/r/kde/comments/jhqbnz/kde_plasma_rendering_problem_black_squares/   The solution was described in https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2442842: apt install libqt5quick5 ** Affects: qtdeclarative-opensource-src-gles (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd gles libqt5quick5 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922587 Title: Black rectangles and lot of non-working things in Hirsute because of libqt5quick5-gles on AMD GPUs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtdeclarative-opensource-src-gles/+bug/1922587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS
>I cannot believe that Canonical has not decided to use https for all their apt repositories. I easily can. Here are some facts: 1. Canonical is a UK-based company. Mark Shuttleworth is a British citizen. 2. UK politics is as usual has anti-crypto direction and in fact UK is a very oppressive regime. Some very nasty acts (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Key_disclosure_law#United_Kingdom , https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RIPA_2000, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPA_2016 ) have been passed in UK like the ones mandating disclosure of crypto keys and providing the info in a decrypted form and legalizing the practice of cyberattacks and malware by UK govt agencies. 3. UK is a member of 5 Eyes and GCHQ had been doing internet surveillance. 4. Some persons who have harmed UK interests have died in very strange circumstancies. The conclusion is simple: it is very unlikely that Mark Shuttleworth will harm UK interests (that would be a de-facto (but not necessarily de-jure, Kozma Prutkov's well-known aphorism postulates "At the sight of working ammunition how miserable are all the constitutions!") high treason) by introducing mitigations that can decrease UK agencies capabilities of committing the things that under legislation of other states (and UK itself, when they are committed not by its agencies) are felonies. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064 Title: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1464064] Re: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS
>to trust any number of backdoored https CAs? Just use HTTP Public Key Pinning. It is was killed by Let's Encrypt as an HTTP extension, but nothing prevents you from using a cert preloaded to the device as a package. Of course it may require some modificatikns to apt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1464064 Title: Ubuntu apt repos are not available via HTTPS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1464064/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1886952] [NEW] ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7
Public bug reported: `import cryptography.hazmat.bindings._constant_time` `ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7` (Ubuntu 20.20 uses Python 3.8.2) ** Affects: python-cryptography (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886952 Title: ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-cryptography/+bug/1886952/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1886950] [NEW] ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7
Public bug reported: `import nacl.bindings.crypto_generichash` `ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7` (Ubuntu 20.20 uses Python 3.8.2) ** Affects: python-nacl (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1886950 Title: ImportError: this module was compiled for Python 3.7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-nacl/+bug/1886950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1848396] [NEW] Shouldn't librpm-dev be called librpm8-dev?
Public bug reported: Shouldn't librpm-dev be called librpm8-dev? The current naming seems to be a bit inconsistent. ** Affects: rpm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848396 Title: Shouldn't librpm-dev be called librpm8-dev? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1848396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1848391] [NEW] Split python stdlib into separate packages
Public bug reported: Python stdlib in large part is written in python and contains pretty standalone modules. Sometimes these modules work even on earlier versions (for example enum of 3.7 works on 3.4, if I remember right). Sometimes these modules work even on different python implementations, like pypy and graalpython. So it may be be beneficial to split python standard lib into standalone packages updated separately. This way even old rotten versions of python will have the latest packages working in it (to determine compatibility it is proposed to use bisection and unittests and a cache for optimization). ** Affects: python3.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848391 Title: Split python stdlib into separate packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.8/+bug/1848391/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847213] [NEW] Upgrade to 4.10.0
Public bug reported: Upgrade to 4.10.0, which has improvements in language server protocol support. ** Affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847213 Title: Upgrade to 4.10.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1847213/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847041] [NEW] lua-compat.patch only adds macrodefs
Public bug reported: It should be done via a command line, since patches are fragile. ** Affects: rpm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847041 Title: lua-compat.patch only adds macrodefs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1847041/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1847034] [NEW] update to 4.15.0
Public bug reported: Earlier versions block building libdnf since it depends on 4.15.0 ** Affects: rpm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847034 Title: update to 4.15.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rpm/+bug/1847034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846222] Re: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend
There were extra libs in my system (from previous version of Ubuntu). After I have fixed them, everything got OK. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846222 Title: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1846222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846053] Re: Use llvm 9 or even llvm-10
Now works, thank you. How about also creating packages built against bleeding-edge latest llvm from the official llvm deb repo as an alternative (and also with other experimental stuff like gallium nine)? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846053 Title: Use llvm 9 or even llvm-10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1846053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846222] Re: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend
KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~$ readelf -s /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep __libc_vfork KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846222 Title: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1846222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846222] Re: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend
KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~$ readelf -d /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 | grep __libc_vfork KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~$ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846222 Title: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1846222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846222] [NEW] __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend
Public bug reported: KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~/$ /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/clangbackend /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/clangbackend: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/../../libpthread.so.0: undefined symbol: __libc_vfork, version GLIBC_PRIVATE KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~/$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/clangbackend qtcreator: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/clangbackend KOLANICH@KOLANICH:~/$ readelf -s /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qtcreator/libexec/../../libpthread.so.0 | grep __libc_vfork 74: 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND __libc_vfork@GLIBC_PRIVATE (13) 679: 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND __libc_vfork@@GLIBC_PRIVA ** Affects: qtcreator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to qtcreator in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846222 Title: __libc_vfork not found in libpthread.so.0 for clangbackend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtcreator/+bug/1846222/+subscriptions -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845966] Re: Conflicts between std::byte and byte
>it’s on SourceForge, I’m guessing it’s MinGW-w64, but it would be nice to know for sure. It is. >Which version of Ubuntu are you using? Have just migrated to eoan. But the issue was present in cosmic and disco too. >If you can attach the code which failed to build because of the conflict, >If you have a small reproducer to illustrate the issue, Not sure that I can produce a really small reproducer. Here is some more info on the issue: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55601740/how-to-crosscompile-applications-on-ubuntu-to-windows . I don't remember what I have meant under "something simplier in terms of dependencies", but I can try to craft the reproducer (not now, in about 10 hours, it is 1:20 AM in GMT+3 now), but I cannot guarantee it will be small. Anyway, if you have a Windows build of Qt 5 of an exception model matching the one used in gcc on your Ubuntu machine, you can try to cross-build some simple app using it just now. >Sorry for the tone it's OK ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845966 Title: Conflicts between std::byte and byte To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1845966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1846053] [NEW] Use llvm 9 or even llvm-10
Public bug reported: 1. llvm 9 has been released, but mesa in the repo still uses llvm 8. 2. llvm 9 bitcode libs for OpenCL cause llvm-8-based mesa to fail because their file format has changed 3. There was a bug in llvm-8-based mesa in disco that caused the OpenCL compiler to hang on the kernels combining hyperbolic and circular functions. There were no hang after I have rebuilt mesa and dri against llvm-10. ** Affects: mesa (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846053 Title: Use llvm 9 or even llvm-10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1846053/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845966] Re: Conflicts between std::byte and byte
>Could you provide a link to the upstream conversation? No. Their bug tracker is on SourceForge, which uses reCAPTCHA, so I cannot sign up (reCAPTCHA is extremily unfriendly to Firefox + privacy.resistFingerprinting users). So I have contacted one of the active users with recent commits and seemengly access to the repo via email and have sent this patch to him. >Also, what version of the package are you using? There’s no release of gcc 8.1.0 with MinGW-w64 in any supported release of the distributions I’m tracking ... This is the patch for the prebuilt release on SourceForge. But the same bug is present in all MinGW-w64 I have encountered, including the ones in Ubuntu and Fedora repos. The files are bit different but the pattern is the same: byte type alias definition has to be guarded. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845966 Title: Conflicts between std::byte and byte To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1845966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845966] [NEW] Conflicts between std::byte and byte
Public bug reported: byte and std::byte definitions in rpcndr and cstddef conflict. I have managed to solve it by adding a define guard, but upstream maintainers think it is not a bug because "they shouldn't conflict". So we need to fix this bug separately. I attach a patch, but it is incomplete. Tbe definition near #define __cpp_lib_byte 201603 should also be fixed the same way. ** Affects: gcc-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "mingw.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845966/+attachment/5292832/+files/mingw.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845966 Title: Conflicts between std::byte and byte To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1845966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1845965] [NEW] We need to ship package supporting all exception models
Public bug reported: For example Qt5 official releases use `dwarf` exception model for i686. ** Affects: gcc-mingw-w64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845965 Title: We need to ship package supporting all exception models To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-mingw-w64/+bug/1845965/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1699912] [NEW] Unable to install lubuntu 17.04 on an lvm drive
Public bug reported: Initrd is without lvm support :( ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699912 Title: Unable to install lubuntu 17.04 on an lvm drive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1699912/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1699863] [NEW] ISO images cannot be booted from LVM2 partitions
Public bug reported: If you try to do this you will fall into initramfs because lvm is not available in initramfs. Could you add necessary tools and scripts into your isos? ** Affects: grub-imageboot (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: initramfs lvm ** Description changed: If you try to do this you will fall into initramfs because lvm is not - available in initramfs. + available in initramfs. Could you add necessary tools and scripts into + your isos? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699863 Title: ISO images cannot be booted from LVM2 partitions To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-imageboot/+bug/1699863/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1666334] [NEW] deb package python3-zope.interface somehow breaks pip
Public bug reported:
When it's installed pip crashes with the following error
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pip/_vendor/__init__.py", line 33, in
vendored
__import__(vendored_name, globals(), locals(), level=0)
ImportError: No module named 'pip._vendor.pkg_resources'
During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 183, in _run_module_as_main
mod_name, mod_spec, code = _get_module_details(mod_name, _Error)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 142, in _get_module_details
return _get_module_details(pkg_main_name, error)
File "/usr/lib/python3.5/runpy.py", line 109, in _get_module_details
__import__(pkg_name)
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pip/__init__.py", line 21, in
from pip._vendor.requests.packages.urllib3.exceptions import
DependencyWarning
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pip/_vendor/__init__.py", line 75, in
vendored("pkg_resources")
File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pip/_vendor/__init__.py", line 36, in
vendored
__import__(modulename, globals(), locals(), level=0)
File "", line 969, in _find_and_load
File "", line 958, in _find_and_load_unlocked
File "", line 664, in _load_unlocked
File "", line 634, in _load_backward_compatible
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2976, in
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2962, in _call_aside
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 3004, in _initialize_master_working_set
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2535, in activate
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2109, in declare_namespace
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2058, in _handle_ns
File
"/usr/share/python-wheels/pkg_resources-0.0.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl/pkg_resources/__init__.py",
line 2078, in _rebuild_mod_path
AttributeError: '_NamespacePath' object has no attribute 'sort'
The distro is yakkety.
** Affects: zope.interface (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: crash pip python3 undefined
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1666334
Title:
deb package python3-zope.interface somehow breaks pip
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zope.interface/+bug/1666334/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556599] Re: ISO images don't have valid partition tables
** Description changed: - I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my - mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) - without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had - been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash - drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, - dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. + I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (Phoenix BIOS 6.00PG, coreboot is + not available for my mainboard, the BIOS is updated to the latest (2008 + year) version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for + UEFI and GPT had been adopted in Linux distros, troubles with booting + from USB flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, + pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso and then show and got >Model: (file) >Disk path/to/kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 6083MB >Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/512B >Partition Table: mac >Disk Flags: >Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags > 1 2048B 6143B 4096BApple > 2 1511MB 1513MB 2425kB EFI (I don't know why it writes 6083MB) fdisk --type=mbr -l ./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso gives + >Disk ./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 1,4 GiB, 1520762880 bytes, 2970240 sectors >Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes >Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes >Disklabel type: dos >Disk identifier: 0x7d4bf71d > >Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type >./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso1 * 0 2970239 2970240 1,4G 0 Empty >./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso2 2950924 29556594736 2,3M ef EFI (FAT-12/16/32) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556599 Title: ISO images don't have valid partition tables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1556599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556599] Re: ISO images don't have valid partition tables
** Description changed: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type - parted path/to/kubuntu/iso + parted path/to/kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso and then show - I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. + and got + >Model: (file) + >Disk path/to/kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 6083MB + >Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/512B + >Partition Table: mac + >Disk Flags: - p.s. More fresh versions of parted (e.g. the one included into 16.04) - show that there are 2 partitions, one is mac, another is efi, and the - table type is mac. + >Number Start End SizeFile system Name Flags + > 1 2048B 6143B 4096BApple + > 2 1511MB 1513MB 2425kB EFI + + (I don't know why it writes 6083MB) + + fdisk --type=mbr -l ./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso + gives + >Disk ./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 1,4 GiB, 1520762880 bytes, 2970240 sectors + >Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes + >Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes + >I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes + >Disklabel type: dos + >Disk identifier: 0x7d4bf71d + > + >Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type + >./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso1 * 0 2970239 2970240 1,4G 0 Empty + >./kubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso2 2950924 29556594736 2,3M ef EFI (FAT-12/16/32) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556599 Title: ISO images don't have valid partition tables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1556599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556599] Re: ISO images don't have valid partition tables
** Description changed: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu/iso and then show - I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbbbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. + I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. + + + p.s. More fresh versions of parted (e.g. the one included into 16.04) show that there are 2 partitions, one is mac, another is efi, and the table is mac. ** Description changed: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu/iso and then show I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. - - p.s. More fresh versions of parted (e.g. the one included into 16.04) show that there are 2 partitions, one is mac, another is efi, and the table is mac. + p.s. More fresh versions of parted (e.g. the one included into 16.04) + show that there are 2 partitions, one is mac, another is efi, and the + table type is mac. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556599 Title: ISO images don't have valid partition tables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1556599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556599] Re: ISO images don't have valid partition tables
** Package changed: usb-creator (Ubuntu) => kubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556599 Title: ISO images don't have valid partition tables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/1556599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1556599] [NEW] ISO images don't have valid partition tables
Public bug reported: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu/iso and then show I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbbbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. ** Affects: usb-creator (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: boot iso ** Description changed: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my - mainboard) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI - and GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from - usb flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, + mainboard, and yes, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) + version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and + GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb + flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu/iso and then show I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbbbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. ** Description changed: I have an old PC with non-UEFI BIOS (coreboot is also unavailable for my - mainboard, and yes, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) - version) without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and - GPT had been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb - flash drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, - pendrivelinux, dd and startup disk creator), none of them helped. + mainboard, the bios is updated to the latest (2008 year) version) + without GPT support. Some years ago, when support for UEFI and GPT had + been adopted in linux distros, troubles with booting from usb flash + drive started. I tried a lot of tools (Rufus, Unetbootin, pendrivelinux, + dd and startup disk creator), none of them had helped. If I type parted path/to/kubuntu/iso and then show I get a message that GPT table signature is found. If I ask parted to treat it as GPT, it says both gpt tables are corrupt. If I ask parted to treat this as mbbbr, it prints nothing. This could be the cause of non-booting. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1556599 Title: ISO images don't have valid partition tables To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-creator/+bug/1556599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
