[Bug 599850] Re: Blueproximity has a brutal memory leak
Hi there, I haven't written a line of code for many years now but I wasn't aware there are still that many users out there using it. Is this problem still existing? Since there has not been any code change I guess there is a problem in the way bp calls the external commands for detection. It has been on my list for a new release to exchange the frequent calls of external programs to an internal solution. I'm sorry I have never done that so far. I am interested in a rewrite but I would like to know where this bug comes from so I can fix it in the rewrite. Thx to everone still using it. Lars -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599850 Title: Blueproximity has a brutal memory leak To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueproximity/+bug/599850/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313040] Re: blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval
** Changed in: blueproximity Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313040 Title: blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueproximity/+bug/313040/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 269322] Re: Daily kernel Oops kills keyboard
Could someone please check if this is still a problem with the newest version of Kubuntu? Thx -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/269322 Title: Daily kernel Oops kills keyboard To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueproximity/+bug/269322/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 456284] Re: proximity.py crashed with TypeError in event_scanChannelResult_changed()
Hi there, is this problem still active? ** Changed in: blueproximity Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/456284 Title: proximity.py crashed with TypeError in event_scanChannelResult_changed() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/blueproximity/+bug/456284/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 286820] Re: blueproximity can be bypassed to not force a lock
Hi Michael, Chris, sorry to step into this conversation way too late. I changed my job last year's summer and bought a house too. So it's no wonder I had little time afterwards to move back to development on blueproximity. It is true that I use LP now to track things like this. I can confirm the bug you described above. Making it more responsive is not possible since bluetooth itself defines some parts here. Proximity checking intervals can be done only once per second and there is some algorithm behind the link quality detection inside the bluetooth stack which also gives slower reaction (normalization seems to take place there). Possible ways to fix this: reduce the lock time and distance. If you leave your computer unlocked, move slower :-). Generally it is no total security tool, it can be used in many creative ways. Locking is just the most obvious one. It is an extra security but you should not rely on it sorely. Please keep locking your computer manually too. Unlocking via blueproximity still works. The other part is creating a daemon, I like the idea and it is on my list for blueproximity 2.0 (which itself is on the list for things to-do during the next 12 months but it has no priority at the moment) Idea list includes: - using a daemon for proximity checking - using a user part for executing the commands (I cannot see a good (secure) way to have the commands be executed as the user other than this daemon) - more devices to be scanned - more events per device to be detected - preset of commands (via plugin mechanism) to be executed - setting up command chains via gui only - keeping it simple enough to still work and look good and being usable by standard users At the moment I am busy with work, family, house and in the sparetime I build a media pc for my mother, creating a nice complete remote control for an ipod touch for mythtv. I know there are some but none of them works as my mother would expect. -- blueproximity can be bypassed to not force a lock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/286820 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313040] Re: blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval
@jsalvata: oh, and could you tell me in what environment this error popped up? were you checking presence of multiple devices? I'd like to reproduce that bug later at home. -- blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 313040] Re: blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval
@jsalvata: could you explain what the patch modifies and for which reason? I may recheck the patch then so I might include it upstream. I am at work now, so I don't have my development environment here with me. -- blueproximity calls the proximity command twice each interval https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313040 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234015] Re: blueproximity is unable to find bluetooth devices
Hi, Sorry I catch on this bug so late, is it still there? Is only scanning affected or even the whole communication? Do you have (I cannot see that in dmesg but ask for it anyway) another bluetooth device connected? Could you post the output of the hciconfig command please? What is the output of this command: dpkg --status python-bluez ? -- blueproximity is unable to find bluetooth devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223317] Re: Documentation gives installation instructions
Isn't this a thing for the packager? I one did that myself but now I think we just sync the debian package. The manual is the same for all distributions so it should be ok to have the reference to the old feisty release. This part of the manual can be safely ignored since one already managed to install blueproximity here, right? -- Documentation gives installation instructions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223317] Re: Documentation gives installation instructions
Isn't this a thing for the packager? I one did that myself but now I think we just sync the debian package. The manual is the same for all distributions so it should be ok to have the reference to the old feisty release. This part of the manual can be safely ignored since one already managed to install blueproximity here, right? -- Documentation gives installation instructions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 223317] Re: Documentation gives installation instructions
Thanks for marking it invalid but this is more a general question. Would it be necessary to remove installation parts of upstream manuals? I believe the user that actually reads that information is already clever enough to skip that part by himself but that are just my two cents - so is there a general way of handling the manuals? -- Documentation gives installation instructions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223317 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197507] Re: [Sync request] Sync glotski (0.2-6) from Debian unstable (main)
** Summary changed: - ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 + [Sync request] Sync glotski (0.2-6) from Debian unstable (main) ** Changed in: glotski (Ubuntu) Assignee: Lars Friedrichs (l-friedrichs) = (unassigned) Status: In Progress = New -- [Sync request] Sync glotski (0.2-6) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197358] Re: patch for use of gtk2.0
Here's the modified patch. Thanks for the hints, RainCT. I shamelessly used your changelog example :-) ** Attachment added: Debdiff for cccd_0.3beta4-6ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12386924/cccd_0.3beta4-6build2.debdiff -- patch for use of gtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197507] Re: [Sync request] Sync glotski (0.2-6) from Debian unstable (main)
Converted to a sync request. -- [Sync request] Sync glotski (0.2-6) from Debian unstable (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197358] Re: patch for use of gtk2.0
Sorry, here is an actually working new patch. Don't know why there was a problem with the old patch, I didn't touch the line patch tells to be malformed :-) Anyhow, it is fixed now, patch does not complain anymore. ** Attachment added: Debdiff for cccd_0.3beta4-6ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12399410/cccd_0.3beta4-6build2.debdiff -- patch for use of gtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197478] Re: ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
Hi, 1. I was asked by persia to help with migration. I believe that GTK1.2 support is to be dropped soon (it will still be in hardy but not in intrepid) 2. I am not so sure about that one but I removed the build dependency because it's either GTK2 including it differently now or it's e16menuedit not even needing it as you can see I removed the linking against that lib and the build still worked. It seemed sane to me but to be honest I am not that much into GTK1.2/2 issues. 3. the patch was created with cdbs-edit-patch and I believe it was named .dpatch by it. It could also be that I renamed it (I am not quite used to proper packaging, so that could have been my fault) I did not check whether the patches actually get used. But I wonder how my debuild worked if it would not patch... Strange... Bye Lars debian bug is http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468866 -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197358] [NEW] patch for use of gtk2.0
Public bug reported: As persia mentioned we need to upgrade packages from gtk1.2 to gtk2.0 this is it. took few source changes. I updated debian/control and debian/changelog too ** Affects: cccd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- patch for use of gtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197358] Re: patch for use of gtk2.0
** Attachment added: Debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12342864/cccd_0.3beta4-6build2.debdiff -- patch for use of gtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197358] Re: patch for use of gtk2.0
** Changed in: cccd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- patch for use of gtk2.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197478] [NEW] ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
Public bug reported: debdiff attached - please drop me a line if you expect more info here... ** Affects: e16menuedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197478] Re: ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
** Attachment added: Debdiff for e16menuedit_0.1.3-3ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12345748/e16menuedit_0.1.3-3ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: e16menuedit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197478 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197507] [NEW] ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
Public bug reported: I am not so sure about the debian/substvars changes and if all build- deps are now correct. It has built on my system though (almost virgin pbuilder env). The package installs with no problems on a hardy livecd. I am not very deep into package creation so I decided no to integrate an extra patch system into the package but patch it right away with the debdiff. Number of changes is pretty small so there should not be a problem with that. ** Affects: glotski (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197507] Re: ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
** Attachment added: Debdiff for glotski_0.2-5ubuntu1 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12346549/glotski_0.2-5ubuntu1.debdiff ** Changed in: glotski (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 197507] Re: ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2
Ok, after working a bit on this one I wanted to post it to upstream but have found that debians BTS files this issue with a patch already under bug 460768. The patches are almost identical so my changes should be safe. Next upstream version will be ok anyway. -- ported from obsolete GTK1.2 to GTK2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137339] Re: [needs-packaging] BlueProximity
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: In Progress = Fix Released -- [needs-packaging] BlueProximity https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191198] Re: [python-cherrypy] [CVE-2008-0252] missing input sanitising, remote vulnerability
Hi, I tried to backport the patch to feisty. I hope everything is correct as this is my first security fix. Please let me know if things are allright. Bye Lars ** Attachment added: Feisty Patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11902652/python-cherrypy_2.2.1-3ubuntu1.1.debdiff -- [python-cherrypy] [CVE-2008-0252] missing input sanitising, remote vulnerability https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 190231] [NEW] HTML docs are incomplete
Public bug reported: in the docs /usr/share/doc/python-bluez/bluetooth.html is the only html file but it refers to several others. These files are missing in the build. It should be rebuilded withthe complete docs or without the above file. ** Affects: pybluez (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- HTML docs are incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190231 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137339] Re: [needs-packaging] BlueProximity
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) = Lars Friedrichs (l-friedrichs) Status: New = In Progress -- [needs-packaging] BlueProximity https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 137339] Re: They must include BlueProximity in repositories
Hi Claudiu, thanks for your effort to include my package into the official repositories. I am a strong supporter of this idea :-). Just as a side note to decision makers: Version 1.2 is quite stable and gives a good user feedback. I alrady packaged it on my own and there is another packaged version available from getdeb.net. Packaging should not be the problem. If anything else is wrong with my software, please tell me so I can change it. Thanks. Lars -- They must include BlueProximity in repositories https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137339 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
