[Bug 356807] Re: rt_ioctl_giwscan log spam removal or fix
This is still in lucid: Linux nas.lbedford.org 2.6.32-19-generic #28-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 31 17:46:20 UTC 2010 i686 GNU/Linux extract from dmesg: [92136.520899] ===rt_ioctl_giwscan. 3(3) BSS returned, data-length = 412 [92196.524034] ===rt_ioctl_giwscan. 2(2) BSS returned, data-length = 310 [92256.520459] ===rt_ioctl_giwscan. 2(2) BSS returned, data-length = 310 [92316.520305] ===rt_ioctl_giwscan. 3(3) BSS returned, data-length = 412 [92376.520600] ===rt_ioctl_giwscan. 4(4) BSS returned, data-length = 548 lspci for the device: 04:00.0 0280: 1814:0781 Note I'm not using this connection at all. I'm getting these messages and traffic even though the device shouldn't be up and doesn't have an IP address. -- rt_ioctl_giwscan log spam removal or fix https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356807 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539680] [NEW] failed to upgrade from hardy to lucid alpha 3
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ... I installed hardy (using the alternate installer, openssh-server as the only task selected) on an apple TV. Only changes from default were: comment out this line in /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist-framebuffer.conf: #blacklist vesafb add the following lines to /etc/initramfs-tools/modules: fbcon vesafb 8139too then I ran update-initramfs -u and rebooted. Then I ran do-release-upgrade -d, which said: update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-27-generic cpio: ./etc/modprobe.d/arch-aliases: Cannot stat: No such file or directory update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.24-27-generic dpkg: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Exception during pm.DoInstall(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2) Could not install the upgrades The upgrade is now aborted. Your system could be in an unusable state. A recovery will run now (dpkg --configure -a). Please report this bug against the 'update-manager' package and include the files in /var/log/dist-upgrade/ in the bug report. installArchives() failed I've attached the files it asked for. ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- failed to upgrade from hardy to lucid alpha 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539680] Re: failed to upgrade from hardy to lucid alpha 3
** Attachment added: dist-upgrade.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41032909/dist-upgrade.tar.gz -- failed to upgrade from hardy to lucid alpha 3 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539680 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463794] Re: sort by name always sorts folders first
there is an option in preferences to do this. ** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged = Invalid -- sort by name always sorts folders first https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463794] Re: sort by name doesn't sort correctly
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #600107 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600107 ** Also affects: nautilus via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600107 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - sort by name doesn't sort correctly + sort by name always sorts folders first -- sort by name always sorts folders first https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463794] Re: sort by name doesn't sort correctly
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34628174/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34628175/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34628176/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34628178/XsessionErrors.txt ** Attachment added: usr_lib_nautilus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34628179/usr_lib_nautilus.txt -- sort by name doesn't sort correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463794] [NEW] sort by name doesn't sort correctly
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus when sorting by name, nautilus puts all the folders first. This isn't sorting by name, it's mixing sort by type and sort by name. There doesn't appear to be an option to sort by name alone. What to do: open a folder in nautilus with a mixture of folders and files, which have interspersed names. For example: mkdir /tmp/testdir; pushd /tmp/testdir mkdir a touch b mkdir c touch d touch e mkdir f popd Expected outcome: open /tmp/testdir in nautilus, sort by name, and they should be in order a to f Actual outcome: open /tmp/testdir in nautilus, sort by name, and you get a - folder c - folder f - folder b - file d - file e - file reversing the sort order reverses the sort inside the types, not in total. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Thu Oct 29 22:27:36 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/nautilus NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: nautilus 1:2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: nautilus Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- sort by name doesn't sort correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463794 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 461157] [NEW] bash-completion fails on files that start with *
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash-completion Description:Ubuntu 9.10 Release:9.10 $ apt-cache policy bash-completion bash-completion: Installed: 1:1.0-3ubuntu2 Candidate: 1:1.0-3ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1:1.0-3ubuntu2 0 500 http://ch.archive.ubuntu.com karmic/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I created a file called *.jpg: lbedf...@stierenried:~/Pictures/Backgrounds$ touch \*.jpg I try to tab complete it with ls: lbedf...@stierenried:~/Pictures/Backgrounds$ ls \*bash: [: too many arguments .jpbash: [: too many arguments bash: [: too many arguments bash never actually completes the filename. Not being sure if it was bash or bash-completion at fault, I purged bash-completion from my machine, and with a new bash, it worked correctly, so it appears to be in bash-completion somewhere. L. ** Affects: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- bash-completion fails on files that start with * https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/461157 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287472] [NEW] Some logging is done to stdout instead of stderr
Public bug reported: strace on x86_64 logs personality changes to stdout using printf. debdiff attached to change this to fprintf(stderr, ...); This is the same in 4.5.18, the latest upstream package. ** Affects: strace (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Some logging is done to stdout instead of stderr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287472] Re: Some logging is done to stdout instead of stderr
** Attachment added: strace.stdout.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18794387/strace.stdout.debdiff -- Some logging is done to stdout instead of stderr https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267696] Re: mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server
I have verified that that version works. The dump works now, with 4.0.x and 5.x DBs. Thanks L. -- mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 267696] Re: mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server
I have verified that that version works. The dump works now, with 4.0.x and 5.x DBs. Thanks L. -- mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 267696] [NEW] mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server
Public bug reported: This affects the version of mysql-dfsg-5.0 in hardy. Intrepid is up to date enough to work correctly. Upstream bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34192 [copied and reworded a little from the upstream bug] mysqldump in 5.0.51 SILENTLY fails to dump databases from mysql 4.0 server. The dump of any 4.0 database is missing the data. It's because now mysqldump unconditionally runs (client/mysqldump.c): my_snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), show create table %s, result_table); if (switch_character_set_results(mysql, binary) || mysql_query_with_error_report(mysql, result, buff) || switch_character_set_results(mysql, default_charset)) DBUG_RETURN(0); where switch_character_set_results() are not supported on mysql 4.1 ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: + This affects the version of mysql-dfsg-5.0 in hardy. Intrepid is up to date enough to + work correctly. + Upstream bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34192 [copied and reworded a little from the upstream bug] mysqldump in 5.0.51 SILENTLY fails to dump databases from mysql 4.0 server. The dump of any 4.0 database is missing the data. It's because now mysqldump unconditionally runs (client/mysqldump.c): my_snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), show create table %s, result_table); if (switch_character_set_results(mysql, binary) || mysql_query_with_error_report(mysql, result, buff) || switch_character_set_results(mysql, default_charset)) DBUG_RETURN(0); where switch_character_set_results() are not supported on mysql 4.1 -- mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.0 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 267696] [NEW] mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server
Public bug reported: This affects the version of mysql-dfsg-5.0 in hardy. Intrepid is up to date enough to work correctly. Upstream bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34192 [copied and reworded a little from the upstream bug] mysqldump in 5.0.51 SILENTLY fails to dump databases from mysql 4.0 server. The dump of any 4.0 database is missing the data. It's because now mysqldump unconditionally runs (client/mysqldump.c): my_snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), show create table %s, result_table); if (switch_character_set_results(mysql, binary) || mysql_query_with_error_report(mysql, result, buff) || switch_character_set_results(mysql, default_charset)) DBUG_RETURN(0); where switch_character_set_results() are not supported on mysql 4.1 ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: + This affects the version of mysql-dfsg-5.0 in hardy. Intrepid is up to date enough to + work correctly. + Upstream bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=34192 [copied and reworded a little from the upstream bug] mysqldump in 5.0.51 SILENTLY fails to dump databases from mysql 4.0 server. The dump of any 4.0 database is missing the data. It's because now mysqldump unconditionally runs (client/mysqldump.c): my_snprintf(buff, sizeof(buff), show create table %s, result_table); if (switch_character_set_results(mysql, binary) || mysql_query_with_error_report(mysql, result, buff) || switch_character_set_results(mysql, default_charset)) DBUG_RETURN(0); where switch_character_set_results() are not supported on mysql 4.1 -- mysqldump fails silently against mysql 4.0 server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267696 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 184101] Re: Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer
My version of the use case is that gpgv fails if the time is incorrect (by enough). So when debian-installer comes to use apt-get fully and authenticating the Release file, it fails. -- Preseedable Network Time Synchronization Support Needed in Debian-Installer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173180] Re: mountvirtfs does not mkdir /var/run and /var/lock
This does not appear to be true for dapper, which apollock nominated this bug
for:
from the umountroot init script:
do_stop () {
[ $VERBOSE != no ] log_action_begin_msg Mounting root filesystem
read-only
mount -n -o remount,ro /
[ $VERBOSE != no ] log_action_end_msg $?
}
--
mountvirtfs does not mkdir /var/run and /var/lock
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173180
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105225] Re: 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock
okay, so where do things go from here? do you have to make the changes for it to be considered for SRU, or do I? it looks like whoever is producing the gutsy one is? -- 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105225] Re: 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock
So where is the LTS for dapper? or is that only for some security updates? 5.0.22 of mysql is going to be pretty obsolete by the time dapper has finished being supported in 2011. Or do we only get support if we pay for it or are willing to use backports? -- 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105225] 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mysql-server-5.0 I'm working on a backup solution for systems that requires running flush tables with read lock followed by an lvm snapshot. In testing, I've had multiple instances where the flush tables will hang with no particular solution short of killing mysqld. The distro currently includes 5.0.22, and lo and behold in the 5.0.23 changelog fixes: A compatibility issue with NPTL (Native POSIX Thread Library) on Linux could result in a deadlock with FLUSH TABLES WITH READ LOCK under some conditions. (Bug#20048) Can the patch be backported/fixed in 5.0.22 please? ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.0 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- 'flush tables with read lock' causes mysql server to deadlock https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105225 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77325] udev brings network connections up in the background
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ifupdown
udev brings network connections up when it sees the device appear,
using /etc/udev/rules.d/85-ifupdown.rules
There is no way to stop it bringing them up, and it brings them up in
the background. This means that if you're using autofs with ldap
maps, and using dhcp on a network with Spanning Tree Protocols,
so there's a 30 second delay for the port to come up, and a delay for
dhcp to kick in, most of the init scripts will start before the network
comes up. In this case, autofs starts before the network is up, so it
can't read the ldap entries for automount, and you get no automounter.
The workarounds I'm using at the moment include nuking
/etc/udev/rules.d/85-ifupdown.rules,
or adding a script to restart autofs in /etc/network/if-up.d/.
A better change might be to change /etc/udev/rules.d/85-ifupdown.rules
from
ACTION==add, RUN+=/sbin/start-stop-daemon --start --background --pid
file /var/run/network/bogus --startas /sbin/ifup -- --allow auto $env{INTERFACE}
to
ACTION==add, RUN+=/sbin/start-stop-daemon --start --background --pid
file /var/run/network/bogus --startas /sbin/ifup -- --allow udev $env{INTERFACE}
but I don't know how classes work in /etc/network/interfaces
** Affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Unconfirmed
--
udev brings network connections up in the background
https://launchpad.net/bugs/77325
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 76409] rpc.gssd doesn't process -d option correctly
Public bug reported: (this applies to feisty at least) If you run rpc.gssd -d /var/run/ccache, you get an error message about ccachedir path name too long. This is due to a bug in the code below: utils/gssd/gssd.c, line 121: - if (ccachedir[sizeof(ccachedir-1)] != '\0') + if (ccachedir[sizeof(ccachedir)-1] != '\0') ** Affects: nfs-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- rpc.gssd doesn't process -d option correctly https://launchpad.net/bugs/76409 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 70852] including hardcoded ../po/ in translation PATH
Public bug reported: do a 'strace env -i LANG=en_US.UTF-8 links www' (the env is just to clear the environment so you know it's not just me). You will see a bunch of: open(../po/en_US.UTF-8.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(../po/en_US.utf8.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(../po/en_US.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(../po/en.UTF-8.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(../po/en.utf8.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) open(../po/en.gmo, O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) I imagine this is introduced in the compile (maybe for testing from the source dir?): $ strings `which links` | grep \\.\\./po ../po/ Apparently it's an upstream feature: /* This is hacked for ELinks - we want to look up for the translations at the * correct place even if we are being ran from the source/build tree. */ .. || !add_to_string(str, ../po/) This is a problem when ../po/ is slow. It could be a problem if ../po/ is malicious, I think (if you run links somewhere where there is a ../po/, will it override the translations?) ** Affects: elinks (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- including hardcoded ../po/ in translation PATH https://launchpad.net/bugs/70852 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 66525] bashrc running slowly due to $(groups)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: bash The following piece of code in /etc/bash.bashrc: # sudo hint if [ ! -e $HOME/.sudo_as_admin_successful ]; then case $(groups) in *\ admin\ *) if [ -x /usr/bin/sudo ]; then cat -EOF To run a command as administrator (user root), use sudo command. See man sudo_root for details. EOF fi esac fi runs groups, which can run extremely slowly, depending on the infrastructure in place (ldap + nscd or whatever). ** Affects: bash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- bashrc running slowly due to $(groups) https://launchpad.net/bugs/66525 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55138] Re: Dell 2950 w/ PERC 5i/Integrated, seeing RAID'd HDD's
any progress? this bug is causing installs on 2950s to be broken, and dell have EOL'd the 2850. L. -- Dell 2950 w/ PERC 5i/Integrated, seeing RAID'd HDD's https://launchpad.net/bugs/55138 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58062] python2.3 not installable
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: python2.3 In edgy, python2.3 is not installable (and once you try to install it, you can't remove the package either, without editting the prerm script): $ sudo apt-get install python2.3 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Suggested packages: python2.3-doc python2.3-profiler Recommended packages: python2.3-cjkcodecs python2.3-iconvcodec python2.3-japanese-codecs The following NEW packages will be installed: python2.3 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/2800kB of archives. After unpacking 9613kB of additional disk space will be used. Selecting previously deselected package python2.3. (Reading database ... 225960 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking python2.3 (from .../python2.3_2.3.5-14_i386.deb) ... Setting up python2.3 (2.3.5-14) ... pycentral: pycentral rtinstall: installed runtime python2.3 not found pycentral rtinstall: installed runtime python2.3 not found dpkg: error processing python2.3 (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: python2.3 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I'm using deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu edgy main restricted universe multiverse in sources.list, and $ apt-cache policy python2.3 python2.3: Installed: 2.3.5-14 Candidate: 2.3.5-14 Version table: *** 2.3.5-14 0 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com edgy/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: python2.3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed ** Tags added: edgy -- python2.3 not installable https://launchpad.net/bugs/58062 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 55138] Re: Dell 2950 w/ PERC 5i/Integrated, seeing RAID'd HDD's
The reason it's a problem is because it's not consistent with the bios. It's also not consistent with itself. I have a 2950 here with 6 drives, all of which are in a RAID 10 volume. So far, the dapper installer has presented me with: 1 drive (RAID volume only) 3 drives (2 physical drives + 1 RAID volume) 7 drives (6 physical drives + 1 RAID volume) The BIOS sees the RAID volume as (hd0), but the driver is seeing it as (hd6) and putting a broken grub config on it. The one time it booted and saw just 1 drive, it worked properly. This is fixed in other kernels. SUSE don't have the problem, and it seemed to be okay in edgy, even though the installer was broken. -- Dell 2950 w/ PERC 5i/Integrated, seeing RAID'd HDD's https://launchpad.net/bugs/55138 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
