[Bug 2067904] [NEW] Send via email doesn't work

2024-06-03 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment:
- ubuntu 24.04
- thunderbird 115.11.0-2 installed as snap - 3 gmail configured

Steps to  reproduce
- Open nautilus
- select a file, right click, send per email

Expected result
- Since there is a mail application configured, a new message window will 
appear, the file selected is already selected as attachment

Actual
- A new message windows will appear without attachment

** Affects: needrestart (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067904

Title:
  Send via email doesn't work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/needrestart/+bug/2067904/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

2024-06-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Summary changed:

- [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular
+ [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  The version in oracular introduces a new package, dh-dlopenlibdeps,
  which is a new build dependency of systemd, that we need to use in the
  upstream CI when building systemd in noble images to ensure Ubuntu is
  covered by the integration tests
  
  [Scope]
  
- Backport version 0.12 from oracular to noble-backports
+ Backport version 0.13 from oracular to noble-backports
  
  [Other Info]
  
  The existing package in this source is unchanged, and the new code is in
  the new binary package that has no reverse dependencies in noble, so
  risk is very low. This will make possible to continue building systemd
  git main in ubuntu noble. No source changes are required, a changelog-
  only upload is sufficient.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/13 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have tested this in a PPA build, and installed it locally in noble,
works as expected: https://launchpad.net/~upstream-systemd-
ci/+archive/ubuntu/systemd-
ci/+packages?field.name_filter=package_filter=published_filter=noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] Re: [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
diff -Nru package-notes-0.12/debian/changelog 
package-notes-0.12~bpo24.04.1/debian/changelog
--- package-notes-0.12/debian/changelog 2024-05-22 15:35:08.0 +0100
+++ package-notes-0.12~bpo24.04.1/debian/changelog  2024-05-30 
00:57:10.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+package-notes (0.12~bpo24.04.1) noble-backports; urgency=medium
+
+  * Rebuild for noble-backports. (LP: #2067544)
+
+ -- Luca Boccassi   Thu, 30 May 2024 00:57:10 +0100
+
 package-notes (0.12) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   [ Luca Boccassi ]

** Also affects: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067544] [NEW] [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

2024-05-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

The version in oracular introduces a new package, dh-dlopenlibdeps,
which is a new build dependency of systemd, that we need to use in the
upstream CI when building systemd in noble images to ensure Ubuntu is
covered by the integration tests

[Scope]

Backport version 0.12 from oracular to noble-backports

[Other Info]

The existing package in this source is unchanged, and the new code is in
the new binary package that has no reverse dependencies in noble, so
risk is very low. This will make possible to continue building systemd
git main in ubuntu noble. No source changes are required, a changelog-
only upload is sufficient.

** Affects: package-notes (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Affects: package-notes (Ubuntu Noble)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  [Impact]
  
  The version in oracular introduces a new package, dh-dlopenlibdeps,
  which is a new build dependency of systemd, that we need to use in the
  upstream CI when building systemd in noble images to ensure Ubuntu is
  covered by the integration tests
  
  [Scope]
  
  Backport version 0.12 from oracular to noble-backports
  
  [Other Info]
-  
- The existing package in this source is unchanged, and the new code is in the 
new binary package that has no reverse dependencies in noble, so risk is very 
low. This will make possible to continue building systemd git main in ubuntu 
noble.
+ 
+ The existing package in this source is unchanged, and the new code is in
+ the new binary package that has no reverse dependencies in noble, so
+ risk is very low. This will make possible to continue building systemd
+ git main in ubuntu noble. No source changes are required, a changelog-
+ only upload is sufficient.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067544

Title:
  [BPO] package-notes/12 from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2067544/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2055237] Re: Backport ps uart RS485 driver

2024-05-21 Thread Luca Corna
@Portia, just to confirm, this will land with the June cycle
(2024.06.03), correct?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055237

Title:
  Backport ps uart  RS485  driver

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-xilinx-zynqmp/+bug/2055237/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Could this be related? https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068363

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1068363
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068363

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056461

Title:
  autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2056461/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Can confirm the stat workaround works for me as well

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056461

Title:
  autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2056461/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2056461] Re: autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

2024-05-02 Thread Luca Boccassi
I'm hitting this as well, running autopkgtest (from latest main) against an 
amd64 noble image built with autopkgtest-buildvm-ubuntu-cloud on Debian stable 
with qemu 7.2.
I can confirm that switching the kernel in the noble image to the 6.5 shipped 
in Mantic fixes the issue, with no other changes, so it does seem like a 
problem introduced by the recent noble kernel update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056461

Title:
  autopkgtest-virt-qemu on noble images sometimes hangs doing copydown

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/autopkgtest/+bug/2056461/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2064587] [NEW] Live usage from USB makes Windows ask for bitlocker key after reboot

2024-05-02 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment: 
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - USB created using rufus https://rufus.ie/ on windows
2 Dell computers - Latitude
Windows 10 & 11 with BitLocker enabled storing recover key on TPM

Steps to reproduce
We used a live version of Ubuntu to check webcam functionality, first on 
windows 10 to see if I can test it, then on Windows 11. Both windows 
installation have BitLocker encryption active using TPM.

Expected result
After shutdown the live system and reboot the computer, Windows should start 
normally

Actual result:
It seems that ubuntu live usage (Try Ubuntu as choice) corrupt something and 
TPM asked for recovery key.

Likelihood not so low since bitlocker usage is growing between W11
installations, but severity pretty high

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064587

Title:
  Live usage from USB makes Windows ask for bitlocker key after reboot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2064587/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060534] Re: Thunderbird disk usage out of control

2024-04-10 Thread luca moscato
Seems a thunderbird bug
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878541


** Bug watch added: Mozilla Bugzilla #1878541
   https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1878541

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060534

Title:
  Thunderbird disk usage out of control

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2060534/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060534] [NEW] Thunderbird disk usage out of control

2024-04-08 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment: Thunderbird 124.0 64bits installed as SNAP on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
3 gmail imap account

This (monday) morning Ubuntu notify me that I was running out of disk
space, and while I was checking where the problem was, the disk analyzer
told me the answer

snap/thunderbird/common directory has a size of more than 360GB, pretty strange 
since my gmail account have 15GB and 30GB of quota (half used more or less)
One of them is a shared one we use for notfication with almost 100k emails, 
flow is very high since with my team we receive emails, handle and archive them.

I tryed to compact database, keep on disk only latest 90 days email but
the sistem started to suffer issues due to no disk space so that I tried
to remove that account and instantly more than 250GB of data on disk
disappeared.

Issue found and fixed but:
- Thunderbird should NOT use so much disk space, some cleanup process MUST be 
implemented to keep disk usage under control, as I wrote system usage is 
impaired
- Is this issue index-related? Since I do a lot of quick search on that account
- Is something snap/linux related? Could be found also on Windows/Mac?
- If someone needs logs, I'd be happy to provide them but I need instructions 
about how to retrieve them.

** Affects: thunderbird (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060534

Title:
  Thunderbird disk usage out of control

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunderbird/+bug/2060534/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060150] [NEW] openssh sets PAM_RHOST to UNKNOWN causing slow logins

2024-04-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

When using sshd's -i option with stdio that is not a AF_INET/AF_INET6
socket, auth_get_canonical_hostname() returns "UNKNOWN" which is then
set as the value of PAM_RHOST, causing pam to try to do a reverse DNS
query of "UNKNOWN", which times out multiple times, causing a
substantial slowdown when logging in.

upstream PR: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/388
upstream email: 
https://lists.mindrot.org/pipermail/openssh-unix-dev/2024-April/041289.html
Fedora backport: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openssh/pull-request/71
Debian backport: https://salsa.debian.org/ssh-team/openssh/-/merge_requests/25

** Affects: openssh (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060150

Title:
  openssh sets PAM_RHOST to UNKNOWN causing slow logins

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2060150/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2015538] Re: [MIR] dbus-broker

2024-03-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
IMHO it would be a worthwhile investment to allocate resources to
implement that plan, as it would benefit desktop users for all cases,
not just with dbus-broker

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2015538

Title:
  [MIR] dbus-broker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-broker/+bug/2015538/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2015538] Re: [MIR] dbus-broker

2024-03-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Errata: I talked with smcv, who explained to me that dbus-run-session is
actually a wrapper around dbus-daemon itself, so they are not
independent.

With user sessions managed by logind, what is the use case for dbus-
run-session in production? I am aware it is used for self-contained
tests and such things, but using depending on the dbus-daemon package
should be fine for that. Anything else?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2015538

Title:
  [MIR] dbus-broker

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus-broker/+bug/2015538/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2038777] Re: UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds (drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c)

2024-03-13 Thread Luca Boccassi
Github Actions enabled KVM for all open source repositories for free in
January:

https://github.blog/2024-01-17-github-hosted-runners-double-the-power-
for-open-source/

We started using it in systemd, and we hit this bug:

https://paste.centos.org/view/411107c8

This will start quickly affecting everybody who tries to use KVM in
their CI jobs on Github. Could you please arrange for this fix to be
backported to the azure kernel for jammy?

** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: linux-meta-azure-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: linux-meta-azure-6.5 (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038777

Title:
  UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds (drivers/net/hyperv/netvsc.c)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2038777/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-03-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
Thank you!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741

Title:
  dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2054741/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-03-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
Pick any package and add to debian/rules:

execute_before_dh_auto_clean:
   echo $(DEB_BUILD_PROFILES)
   exit 1


root@jammy:/tmp/s# dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -b
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package systemd
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 255.4-1
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution sid
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Luca Boccassi 
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
 dpkg-source --before-build .
 debian/rules clean
dh clean --without autoreconf --buildsystem=meson
   debian/rules execute_before_dh_auto_clean
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/s'
echo noudeb
noudeb
exit 1
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:179: execute_before_dh_auto_clean] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/s'
make: *** [debian/rules:291: clean] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules clean subprocess returned exit status 2
root@jammy:/tmp/s# DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=foo dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us -b
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source package systemd
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source version 255.4-1
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source distribution sid
dpkg-buildpackage: info: source changed by Luca Boccassi 
dpkg-buildpackage: info: host architecture amd64
 dpkg-source --before-build .
 debian/rules clean
dh clean --without autoreconf --buildsystem=meson
   debian/rules execute_before_dh_auto_clean
make[1]: Entering directory '/tmp/s'
echo noudeb foo
noudeb foo
exit 1
make[1]: *** [debian/rules:179: execute_before_dh_auto_clean] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/s'
make: *** [debian/rules:291: clean] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules clean subprocess returned exit status 2
root@jammy:/tmp/s# apt-cache policy dpkg
dpkg:
  Installed: 1.21.1ubuntu2.3
  Candidate: 1.21.1ubuntu2.3
  Version table:
 *** 1.21.1ubuntu2.3 500
500 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.21.1ubuntu2.3~ppa22.04.1 500
500 
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/upstream-systemd-ci/systemd-ci/ubuntu 
jammy/main amd64 Packages
 1.21.1ubuntu2.2 500
500 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-updates/main amd64 
Packages
 1.21.1ubuntu2.1 500
500 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-security/main amd64 
Packages
 1.21.1ubuntu2 500
500 http://azure.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741

Title:
  dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2054741/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-03-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
The previous lvm2 upload has now migrated from proposed to noble.
cryptsetup 2.7.0 is also now available in noble, which also can make use
of this bug fix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054620

Title:
  libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/2054620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045385] Re: Add ODM driver rtc-pcf85263

2024-03-01 Thread Luca Calligaris
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-intel-iotg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045385

Title:
  Add ODM driver rtc-pcf85263

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2045385/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045386] Re: Add ODM driver gpio-m058ssan

2024-03-01 Thread Luca Calligaris
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-intel-iotg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045386

Title:
  Add ODM driver gpio-m058ssan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2045386/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2045387] Re: Add ODM driver f81604 usb-can

2024-03-01 Thread Luca Calligaris
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-intel-iotg
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-intel-iotg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045387

Title:
  Add ODM driver f81604 usb-can

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/2045387/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054556] Re: [SRU] Update Machine Entries for AMD-Xilinx Kria Boards

2024-03-01 Thread Luca Corna
@Ɓukasz,

about your concern about ZCU111, we should have explained that we don't
support ZCU111 and it never was: https://ubuntu.com/download/amd

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054556

Title:
  [SRU] Update Machine Entries for AMD-Xilinx Kria Boards

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flash-kernel/+bug/2054556/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-29 Thread Luca Boccassi
The autopkgtest failures are unrelated, one is some patch fuzz:

15200s == Unapplying the patch ==
15200s patching file solenv/gbuild/UITest.mk
15200s Hunk #1 succeeded at 34 with fuzz 1.
15200s Hunk #2 succeeded at 71 with fuzz 2 (offset 6 lines).
15200s Hunk #3 succeeded at 92 (offset -3 lines).
15200s patching file solenv/gbuild/Module.mk
15200s Hunk #1 succeeded at 212 (offset 11 lines).
15200s Hunk #2 succeeded at 392 (offset 20 lines).
15200s Hunk #3 succeeded at 504 (offset 25 lines).
15200s it failed
15200s autopkgtest [01:36:42]: test uicheck-sw: ---]
15201s autopkgtest [01:36:43]: test uicheck-sw:  - - - - - - - - - - results - 
- - - - - - - - -
15201s uicheck-sw   FAIL non-zero exit status 2

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
jammy/jammy/ppc64el/libr/libreoffice/20240229_025213_7395c@/log.gz

and the other one is due to the recent usr-merge changes in base-files
breaking debootstrap:

205s tar: ./bin: Cannot create symlink to 'usr/bin': File exists
205s tar: ./lib: Cannot create symlink to 'usr/lib': File exists
205s tar: ./sbin: Cannot create symlink to 'usr/sbin': File exists

https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-
jammy/jammy/arm64/p/pbuilder/20240229_090138_97dd0@/log.gz

Could it be hinted to migrate, please?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741

Title:
  dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2054741/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
Verified that the packages in proposed work and solve the bug. Thanks!

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy 
verification-needed-mantic
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy 
verification-done-mantic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741

Title:
  dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2054741/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2/+merge/461372

** Merge proposal unlinked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2/+merge/460984

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054620

Title:
  libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/2054620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054620] Re: libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

2024-02-27 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed:

  When libcryptsetup tries to activate a signed dm-verity volume, and the
  key is not in the kernel keyring, libdevicemapper does not return the
  appropriate ENOKEY, so the failure cannot be distinguished from other
  generic issues.
+ 
+ This is a problem when software like systemd via libcryptsetup try to
+ open a volume, and get an unrecognizable error out of it. With the fix
+ in libdm and libcryptsetup, there is a clear ENOKEY returned when a key
+ is missing and activation fails for that reason. This allows systemd
+ (and other applications) to make the right decision depending on the
+ failure case. Without this, the same generic error is returned in any
+ case.
+ 
+ For more details, see:
+ 
+ https://gitlab.com/cryptsetup/cryptsetup/-/issues/841
+ 
+ libcryptsetup 2.7.0, now available in debian stable, and systemd v255,
+ shipped in Noble, make use of this error code.
  
  This is fixed in the lvm2 version 2.03.23 upstream release.
  
  Please consider backporting this patch for Noble.
  
  Upstream PR: https://gitlab.com/lvmteam/lvm2/-/merge_requests/3
  Upstream commit: 25ef7a7b1a876f491bd361369423d7309358f6c1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054620

Title:
  libdm returns wrong error code when dm-verity key cannot be found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+bug/2054620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054741] Re: dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

2024-02-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed:

+ [Impact]
+ 
  DEB_BUILD_PROFILES= can be used in Debian to specify a build profile to
  use with dpkg-buildpackage. We want to use it in the systemd project to
  build the upstream packages for the Ubuntu autopkgtest cloud CI on
  Github. But in the Ubuntu's fork of dpkg, DEB_BUILD_PROFILES's value is
  ignored and unconditionally swapped with 'noudeb'. This makes it
  impossible to use package-specific profiles, and it's a regression w.r.t
  Debian.
  
+ [Fix]
+ 
+ Backport patch from Noble that fixes the issue: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~bluca/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+git/dpkg/+merge/461136
+ and takes into account if the environment variable is set when reading the 
profile
+ 
+ [Test]
+ 
  To reproduce it, simply print the content of DEB_BUILD_PROFILES in
  d/rules in any package and build with DEB_BUILD_PROFILES=foo dpkg-
- buildpackage.
+ buildpackage. Before the fix, whatever is passed via the env var is
+ ignored. After the fix, it will be respected.
+ 
+ [Regression Potential]
+ 
+ dpkg-buildpackage is used to build all packages, so in case of
+ unforeseen issues other packages could potentially fail to build. A unit
+ test exercising this change is included in the patch to minimize
+ potential for regressions.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054741

Title:
  dpkg-buildpackage ignores DEB_BUILD_PROFILES

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/2054741/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1976475] Re: Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption

2022-06-02 Thread luca moscato
Not possible anymore, I had to deliver that pc in hurry so I switch back
to Ubuntu 20.04 (that worked, so this is a regression bug). I have no
pc, at least in short term to test again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1976475

Title:
  Installer crash when try to enable disk encryption

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1976475/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1897932] Re: systemd-repart not packaged

2022-05-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Any chance it could be enabled now that Jammy shipped? It's really fine
to enable it in 249 for 20.10, there's really no reason to wait for a
new version

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1897932

Title:
  systemd-repart not packaged

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1897932/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971044] Re: The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session registration

2022-05-02 Thread luca fiore
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1969896 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969896

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1969896
   Evince Document Viewer(42.0) does not remember last page in 22.04

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971044

Title:
  The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session
  registration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1971044/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971044] Re: The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session registration

2022-05-02 Thread luca fiore
** Summary changed:

- The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session registration 
+ The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session registration

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971044

Title:
  The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session
  registration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1971044/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921828] Re: Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to connect

2022-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921828

Title:
  Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1921828/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867184] Re: Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect

2022-04-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867184

Title:
  Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1867184/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1971044] [NEW] The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session registration

2022-04-30 Thread luca fiore
Public bug reported:

The bookmark function doesn't work (the keys "plus" and "minus" are grey
in color and are unclickable) and when i close and reopen the
application it doesn't re-enter on the page of the closed session.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: evince 42.1-3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-28.29-generic 5.15.35
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-28-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Apr 30 15:23:27 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-30 (121 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=it_IT.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: evince
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: evince (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy third-party-packages wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971044

Title:
  The bookmark function doesn't work and doesn't work the session
  registration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evince/+bug/1971044/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1803881] Re: thermal thermal_zone4: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)

2022-04-18 Thread Luca-formaggia
I have the same problem: thermal thermal_zone6: failed to read out
thermal zone (-61)

lenovo Thinkpad X1 Carbon 9th Gen
Ubuntu 20.04
Kernel  5.14.0-1032-oem
Firmware 1.187.29

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1803881

Title:
  thermal thermal_zone4: failed to read out thermal zone (-61)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1803881/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966989] [NEW] Suspend mode drains battery activating fan

2022-03-29 Thread Luca-formaggia
Public bug reported:

I have a new thinkpad carbion x1 9th Gen with ubuntu 20.04. Everything
works excellently a part suspend. If I suspend either using the command
or closing the lid, after a while fan starts spinning and battery is
draining fast.

I have seen that other people have found the same problem. I do not know
if there is a bug fix or a viable workaround.

lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Release:20.04

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.14.0-1031-oem 5.14.0-1031.34
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.14.0-1031.34-oem 5.14.21
Uname: Linux 5.14.0-1031-oem x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Tue Mar 29 19:29:41 2022
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-20 (9 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20220223)
SourcePackage: linux-signed-oem-5.14
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-signed-oem-5.14 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal lenovo third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966989

Title:
  Suspend mode drains battery activating fan

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-oem-5.14/+bug/1966989/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Is there a chance to SRU a targeted patch for LXD in Bionic to fix the
issue instead?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959047

Title:
  systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1959047/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959047] Re: systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

2022-03-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
This is caused by
https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/tree/debian/patches/debian/UBUNTU-
Revert-namespace-be-more-careful-when-handling-
namespacin.patch?h=ubuntu/jammy

From upstream's point of view, ignoring sandboxing options requested by
unit owners is quite dangerous. It can result in programs running
completely unconstrained.

See: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/22760

** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues #22760
   https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/22760

** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959047

Title:
  systemd ignores RootDirectory option in .service units

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/1959047/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965286] Re: hp stream 13 doesn't resume after suspend to ram (regression)

2022-03-17 Thread Luca Olivetti
After filing the bug report, I tried to remove the input_leds module
(the only one that had a resemblance to the reported "input" in
/sys/powear/pm_trace_dev_match), still it doesn't resume.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965286

Title:
  hp stream 13 doesn't resume after suspend to ram (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1965286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965286] [NEW] hp stream 13 doesn't resume after suspend to ram (regression)

2022-03-17 Thread Luca Olivetti
Public bug reported:

I just upgraded from 18.04 lts to 20.04 lts then to 21.10.
On 18.04 resume after suspend worked, with 21.10 it doesn't (after pressing the 
power button the power led turns on but the screen stays black, no matter if 
before suspend it was in X, wayland or a console). I didn't test with 20.04 
(but I tried booting its kernel, same result).
I tried to follow the steps in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingKernel/Suspend 
but I cannot find any "hash matches" in dmesg and 
/sys/powear/pm_trace_dev_match says "input".
I tried with the mainline kernel (5.16) same result.
I also tried to install the kernel from 18.04 (4.15.0-172) but it panics saying 
it cannot find the root partition.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: linux-image-5.13.0-35-generic 5.13.0-35.40
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-35.40-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-35-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu71
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  luca   1005 F pulseaudio
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Thu Mar 17 11:15:00 2022
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=d2a3724a-3233-4081-a1e2-542ee08c68f2
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-06 (2201 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0a5c:216c Broadcom Corp. BCM43142A0 Bluetooth Device
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 05e3:0608 Genesys Logic, Inc. Hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 0bda:57c4 Realtek Semiconductor Corp. HP Truevision HD
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP Stream Notebook PC 13
ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-35-generic 
root=UUID=f8b20c7d-bd75-42eb-8a39-4cb262d6e1e4 ro
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-5.13.0-35-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-5.13.0-35-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware 1.201.5
SourcePackage: linux
StagingDrivers: atomisp_gmin_platform atomisp_lm3554
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2022-03-16 (0 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 09/25/2015
dmi.bios.release: 15.23
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
dmi.bios.version: F.17
dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 802A
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: 56.21
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 56.33
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.17:bd09/25/2015:br15.23:efr56.33:svnHP:pnHPStreamNotebookPC13:pvrType1-ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn802A:rvr56.21:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:skuP3Y01EA#ABE:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=STR X=Null
dmi.product.name: HP Stream Notebook PC 13
dmi.product.sku: P3Y01EA#ABE
dmi.product.version: Type1 - ProductConfigId
dmi.sys.vendor: HP

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish staging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965286

Title:
  hp stream 13 doesn't resume after suspend to ram (regression)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1965286/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875015] Re: Displaylink is extremely slow

2022-03-11 Thread Luca Capra
I just updated my ubuntu 21.10 with normal apt software updates and the
issues is here again. It used to work well since beginning of December
2021

Linux 5.13.0-35-generic #40-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 7 08:03:10 UTC 2022
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875015

Title:
  Displaylink is extremely slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nouveau/+bug/1875015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1871538] Re: dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

2022-03-11 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed also in systemd v250.4 and v249.11

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1871538

Title:
  dbus timeout-ed during an upgrade, taking services down including gdm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dbus/+bug/1871538/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961758] Re: Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

2022-03-08 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: tpm2-tss-engine (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961758

Title:
  Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1961758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961758] Re: Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

2022-03-05 Thread Luca Boccassi
tpm2-tss has been updated to 3.2 in Jammy a couple of days ago. Also,
you should be using tpm2-openssl rather than tpm2-tss-engine, in order
to work with OpenSSL 3.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961758

Title:
  Fail to run tpm2 command under ubuntu server 22.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1961758/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1962337] [NEW] Pointer,Prospekt Mail

2022-02-25 Thread Jan Luca Oster
Public bug reported:

My Mouse sometimes jumps from left to right and presses down the right and left 
buttons. Restarting helps. It opens apps and i am unable to use the computer.
Prospekt Mail refuses to open.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+19ubuntu14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-30.33~20.04.1-generic 5.13.19
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-30-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Feb 25 18:05:27 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: focal
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: No
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 [8086:1616] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA 
controller])
   Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company HD Graphics 5500 [103c:80dd]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-01-29 (27 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 04f2:b50c Chicony Electronics Co., Ltd HP Truevision HD
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 8087:0a2a Intel Corp. 
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c534 Logitech, Inc. Unifying Receiver
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: HP HP ENVY m6 Notebook
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.13.0-30-generic 
root=UUID=4e8d5df3-3d45-48d0-a629-0d7e3fa05d7e ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/16/2015
dmi.bios.release: 15.34
dmi.bios.vendor: Insyde
dmi.bios.version: F.22
dmi.board.asset.tag: Type2 - Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: 80DD
dmi.board.vendor: HP
dmi.board.version: 64.31
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Chassis Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: HP
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 64.31
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnInsyde:bvrF.22:bd10/16/2015:br15.34:efr64.31:svnHP:pnHPENVYm6Notebook:pvrType1ProductConfigId:rvnHP:rn80DD:rvr64.31:cvnHP:ct10:cvrChassisVersion:skuT0U83UA#ABA:
dmi.product.family: 103C_5335KV G=N L=CON B=HP S=ENV
dmi.product.name: HP ENVY m6 Notebook
dmi.product.sku: T0U83UA#ABA
dmi.product.version: Type1ProductConfigId
dmi.sys.vendor: HP
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.107-8ubuntu1~20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 21.2.6-0ubuntu0.1~20.04.1
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.20.13-1ubuntu1~20.04.2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20200226-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.16-1

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962337

Title:
  Pointer,Prospekt Mail

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1962337/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875298] Re: Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fakechroot (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875298

Title:
  Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakechroot/+bug/1875298/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961610] Re: i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
Bug against fakechroot:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakechroot/+bug/1875298

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961610

Title:
  i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1961610/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961610] Re: i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
Note that the only dependency is libjemalloc, whicih already has an i386
build, so there would be no other new i386 builds apart from
libfakechroot itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961610

Title:
  i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1961610/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875298] Re: Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

2022-02-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
This affects Jammy, and it is stopping the init-system-helpers
migration. See: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-
meta/+bug/1961610

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875298

Title:
  Focal Fossa is missing libfakechroot:i386 package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fakechroot/+bug/1875298/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961771] Re: Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

2022-02-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961771

Title:
  Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1961771/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961771] [NEW] Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

2022-02-22 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

The CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT option allows to support
pretimeout actions on device drivers without the hardware capability to
support it. It was introduced in Linux 5.14:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/7b7d2fdc8c3e3f9fdb3558d674e1eeddc16c7d9e

It is now enabled in Debian:

https://salsa.debian.org/kernel-
team/linux/-/commit/d09d223632f0505c3a82dc77d6f70e120002a221

More information about watchdog pretimeouts:

https://elinux.org/Tests:Watchdog-Pretimeout

We are adding support for this feature in systemd:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/19970

More specifically, if it was enabled in Jammy, we could add an upstream
autopkgtest case using qemu to cover this functionality, which is not
tested at all currently, when we rebase our autopkgtest image from Focal
to Jammy.

[Test Plan]

To verify that this is working, simply boot Qemu with '-device
i6300esb,id=watchdog0 -watchdog-action reset' then check the available
governors:

modprobe pretimeout_noop
cat /sys/class/watchdog/watchdog0/pretimeout_available_governors

[Where problems could occur]

The feature is disabled by default, as the modules have to be manually
loaded, so chance of side effects for general users is very low.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961771

Title:
  Enable CONFIG_WATCHDOG_HRTIMER_PRETIMEOUT in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1961771/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961610] [NEW] i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

2022-02-21 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

As per instructions on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/i386

fakechroot (arch: all) requires libfakechroot, but this is not built for
i386: https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/libfakechroot

init-system-helpers, which builds a package allow-listed for i386
builds, now build-depends on fakechroot for build-time unit tests, but
given libfakechroot is not available for i386, the i386 build cannot
start and thus migration from proposed is held back:

https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/init-system-helpers
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html

init-system-helpers (1.61 to 1.62)
Migration status for init-system-helpers (1.61 to 1.62): BLOCKED: Maybe 
temporary, maybe blocked but Britney is missing information (check below)
Issues preventing migration:
missing build on i386: init (from 1.61)

Please enable the libfakechroot i386 build. Thank you!

** Affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961610

Title:
  i386: seed inclusion for libfakechroot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-meta/+bug/1961610/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1932531] Re: Missing python3-decorator dependency

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1932531

Title:
  Missing python3-decorator dependency

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric/+bug/1932531/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1515759] Re: Python 3 support for python-fabric

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1515759

Title:
  Python 3 support for python-fabric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric/+bug/1515759/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1653755] Re: Missing python-crypto dependancy

2022-02-19 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: fabric (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1653755

Title:
  Missing python-crypto dependancy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fabric/+bug/1653755/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959901] Re: [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-14 Thread Luca Boccassi
The package just made it through the Debian NEW queue, so it should be
available in experimental shortly - which I believe can be synced easily
to jammy (but still needs a manual action).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959901

Title:
  [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1959901/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960233] [NEW] Firmware update doens't show any feedback

2022-02-07 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS on Dell Latitude

When Ubuntu Software tells me about a firmware update available (see
picture attached) I can click on update button to apply it.

Actual results
Firmware update disappear for a second and then re-appear without any message, 
like no action took place

Expected results
We all know that the firmware is loaded somewhere in the system and during the 
following reboot (at least on my Dell) the BIOS update is applied. But at least 
I'd expect that the upgrade option doesn't re-appear immediately after the 
click on the upgrade button and a message like: the firmware will be applied at 
the next reboot. 
Reboot now - Reboot later

I personally think that there will be three things to do to improve UX of the 
process (and improve security)
- The operation should be done with admin permission, no admin password has 
been requested
- The firmware notice should disapper after the click on upgrade button
- A message should alert the user that the new BIOS has been installed and will 
be applied at the next reboot

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: bios firmware software

** Attachment added: "Generic image about firmware update"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960233/+attachment/5559544/+files/gnome-firmware.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960233

Title:
  Firmware update doens't show any feedback

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1960233/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960026] [NEW] deb file managment missing

2022-02-04 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS - Fully upgraded

Natively Ubuntu doesn't handle correctly with a GUI application files in
deb format since GDebi is not installed by default.

Quick example is Virtualbox installation: if I download the deb file and
double click on it, Software Install will take care of the installation,
fine. But if I download the new version as deb file, Software update
doesn't handle the upgrade procedure.

IMHO the quick fix of this bad UX is to install by default GDebi and
make .deb file associated with that application that has GUI.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: ux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960026

Title:
  deb file managment missing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960026/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959901] Re: [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed:

  Provides an OpenSSL 3.0 compatible new-style engine (ie, provider).
  Supersedes https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine which is
  OpenSSL 1.x specific and has been marked for removal from Jammy:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1959414
  
  It has been uploaded to Debian (ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
  bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004491 ) but it is in the NEW queue (
  https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1.html ), and might
  not make it through in time for the last sync before feature freeze,
  hence requesting a direct Jammy upload. For 22.10 hopefully it will have
  cleared Debian's NEW and no Ubuntu-specific upload will be necessary
  anymore.
  
  URL: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-openssl
  License: BSD-3-Clause
  
  Packaging is maintained on Salsa:
  https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tpm2-openssl
  
+ PPA build: https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/tpm2-tss-
+ engine/+packages
+ 
  Tested a local build and run on a Jammy image:
  
- root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# cat /etc/os-release 
+ root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# cat /etc/os-release
  PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development branch)"
  NAME="Ubuntu"
  VERSION_ID="22.04"
  VERSION="22.04 (Jammy Jellyfish)"
  VERSION_CODENAME=jammy
  ID=ubuntu
  ID_LIKE=debian
  HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
  SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
  BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
  
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
  UBUNTU_CODENAME=jammy
- root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# apt install 
./tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb 
+ root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# apt install 
./tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  Note, selecting 'tpm2-openssl' instead of 
'./tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb'
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
-   tpm2-openssl
+   tpm2-openssl
  0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 61 not upgraded.
  Need to get 0 B/35.9 kB of archives.
  After this operation, 147 kB of additional disk space will be used.
  Get:1 /tmp/tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb tpm2-openssl amd64 
1.0.1-1ubuntu1 [35.9 kB]
  Selecting previously unselected package tpm2-openssl:amd64.
  (Reading database ... 39875 files and directories currently installed.)
  Preparing to unpack .../tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
  Unpacking tpm2-openssl:amd64 (1.0.1-1ubuntu1) ...
  Setting up tpm2-openssl:amd64 (1.0.1-1ubuntu1) ...
- Scanning processes... 

+ Scanning processes...
  
  No services need to be restarted.
  
  No containers need to be restarted.
  
  No user sessions are running outdated binaries.
  root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# openssl rand -provider tpm2 -hex 10
  0a633eda94224a809ba5

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959901

Title:
  [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1959901/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959901] [NEW] [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

2022-02-03 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

Provides an OpenSSL 3.0 compatible new-style engine (ie, provider).
Supersedes https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine which is
OpenSSL 1.x specific and has been marked for removal from Jammy:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1959414

It has been uploaded to Debian (ITP: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004491 ) but it is in the NEW queue (
https://ftp-master.debian.org/new/tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1.html ), and might
not make it through in time for the last sync before feature freeze,
hence requesting a direct Jammy upload. For 22.10 hopefully it will have
cleared Debian's NEW and no Ubuntu-specific upload will be necessary
anymore.

URL: https://github.com/tpm2-software/tpm2-openssl
License: BSD-3-Clause

Packaging is maintained on Salsa:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/tpm2-openssl

Tested a local build and run on a Jammy image:

root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# cat /etc/os-release 
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu Jammy Jellyfish (development branch)"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION_ID="22.04"
VERSION="22.04 (Jammy Jellyfish)"
VERSION_CODENAME=jammy
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
UBUNTU_CODENAME=jammy
root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# apt install 
./tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Note, selecting 'tpm2-openssl' instead of 
'./tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb'
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  tpm2-openssl
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 61 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/35.9 kB of archives.
After this operation, 147 kB of additional disk space will be used.
Get:1 /tmp/tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb tpm2-openssl amd64 
1.0.1-1ubuntu1 [35.9 kB]
Selecting previously unselected package tpm2-openssl:amd64.
(Reading database ... 39875 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack .../tpm2-openssl_1.0.1-1ubuntu1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking tpm2-openssl:amd64 (1.0.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Setting up tpm2-openssl:amd64 (1.0.1-1ubuntu1) ...
Scanning processes...   
  

No services need to be restarted.

No containers need to be restarted.

No user sessions are running outdated binaries.
root@jammy-server-cloudimg-amd64:/tmp# openssl rand -provider tpm2 -hex 10
0a633eda94224a809ba5

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: needs-packaging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959901

Title:
  [needs-packaging] tpm2-openssl

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1959901/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1773708] Re: Log in to VPN with TOTP codes

2022-01-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773708

Title:
  Log in to VPN with TOTP codes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1773708/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1809839] Re: Daily build 2667 broken for protocol=GP

2022-01-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1809839

Title:
  Daily build 2667 broken for protocol=GP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1809839/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1867184] Re: Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect

2022-01-28 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867184

Title:
  Cannot connect to Cisco ASA with openconnect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1867184/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922272] Re: jitterentropy-rngd uses 100% CPU on Linux >= 5.11

2022-01-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed in Impish

** Changed in: jitterentropy-rngd (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922272

Title:
  jitterentropy-rngd uses 100% CPU on Linux >= 5.11

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jitterentropy-rngd/+bug/1922272/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957005] Re: keyboard and touchpad stopped working

2022-01-24 Thread Luca Bianchi
it was an hardware issue

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

** Changed in: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Luca Bianchi (luca.bianchi.91)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957005

Title:
  keyboard and touchpad stopped working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.11/+bug/1957005/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1923202] Re: Fails to build directory, tar or btrfs subvolumes

2022-01-23 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Changed in: mkosi (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923202

Title:
  Fails to build directory, tar or btrfs subvolumes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mkosi/+bug/1923202/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1955338] Re: package stlink-tools (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/modprobe.d/stlink_v1.conf', which is also in package stlink 1.7.0-1

2022-01-16 Thread Luca Boccassi
There is no stlink binary package, and never has been in Debian/Ubuntu?
Where does it come from? Paste the output of 'apt info stlink'

** Changed in: stlink (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1955338

Title:
  package stlink-tools (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying
  to overwrite '/etc/modprobe.d/stlink_v1.conf', which is also in
  package stlink 1.7.0-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/stlink/+bug/1955338/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1957005] [NEW] keyboard and touchpad stopped working

2022-01-10 Thread Luca Bianchi
Public bug reported:

Onboard Keyboard and touchpad stopped working, but I notice that the
Brightness controls (FN+F2/F3) still work. External USB keyboard and
mouse work properly.

luca@luca-SATELLITE-L850-1PD:~$ uname -a
Linux luca-SATELLITE-L850-1PD 5.11.0-44-generic #48~20.04.2-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 
14 15:36:44 UTC 2021 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: linux-image-5.11.0-44-generic 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-44.48~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-44-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Mon Jan 10 21:27:14 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-05-26 (594 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200423)
SourcePackage: linux-signed-hwe-5.11
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-signed-hwe-5.11 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

** Attachment added: "/proc/bus/input/devices"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957005/+attachment/5553150/+files/devices

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1957005

Title:
  keyboard and touchpad stopped working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-signed-hwe-5.11/+bug/1957005/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1921828] Re: Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to connect

2022-01-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed by 8.10-5, waiting for migration from Debian unstable

** Changed in: openconnect (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921828

Title:
  Cisco AnyConnect 4.8+ server requires a trivial patch to connect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openconnect/+bug/1921828/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1956090] Re: Not possible to choose which admin should enter password

2021-12-31 Thread luca moscato
changed components

** Project changed: calibre => ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956090

Title:
  Not possible to choose which admin should enter password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1956090/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908097] Re: installation warnings

2021-12-30 Thread Luca Boccassi
Fixed in 3.1.1-4 (impish)

** Changed in: azure-cosmos-python (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908097

Title:
  installation warnings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azure-cosmos-python/+bug/1908097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875015] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 and Displaylink is extremely slow

2021-12-01 Thread Luca Capra
Nice write up, I am back to my evdi device from a week and is working
flawless now. Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875015

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 and Displaylink is extremely slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nouveau/+bug/1875015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] Re: Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no disk space in /boot

2021-11-22 Thread luca moscato
Same as for Comment #13:

Still Incomplete or need other info?


** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

2021-11-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
It seems it appeared here:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=0_text=

Thank you for your work!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdbus-cpp/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

2021-11-18 Thread Luca Boccassi
Hopefully this is enough reg. testing: newer releases have an "examples"
directory upstream. I've cloned the repository on Focal, added the
package via my PPA, and built the examples locally (and stripped rpath
to ensure they are using the system lib). The examples are working fine:

root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# cat /etc/os-release 
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION="20.04 LTS (Focal Fossa)"
ID=ubuntu
ID_LIKE=debian
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 20.04 LTS"
VERSION_ID="20.04"
HOME_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/;
SUPPORT_URL="https://help.ubuntu.com/;
BUG_REPORT_URL="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/;
PRIVACY_POLICY_URL="https://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/privacy-policy;
VERSION_CODENAME=focal
UBUNTU_CODENAME=focal
root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# apt-cache policy libsdbus-c++0
libsdbus-c++0:
  Installed: 0.8.3-4~bpo20.04.1
  Candidate: 0.8.3-4~bpo20.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 0.8.3-4~bpo20.04.1 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/bluca/sdbus-cpp/ubuntu focal/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# ldd examples/obj-manager-server 
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x7ffe0f8e2000)
libsdbus-c++.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsdbus-c++.so.0 
(0x7f378edfb000)
libstdc++.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6 
(0x7f378ec1a000)
libgcc_s.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc_s.so.1 
(0x7f378ebff000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x7f378ea0d000)
libsystemd.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libsystemd.so.0 
(0x7f378e96)
libm.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x7f378e811000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x7f378ee48000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x7f378e804000)
liblzma.so.5 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblzma.so.5 (0x7f378e7dd000)
liblz4.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/liblz4.so.1 (0x7f378e7bc000)
libgcrypt.so.20 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcrypt.so.20 
(0x7f378e69e000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 
(0x7f378e67b000)
libgpg-error.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgpg-error.so.0 
(0x7f378e658000)
root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# ./examples/obj-manager-server >/dev/null &
[1] 2639
root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# 
root@focal:/tmp/sdbus-cpp/b# ./examples/obj-manager-client 
/org/sdbuscpp/examplemanager/Planet1/Earth added:   
org.sdbuscpp.ExampleManager.Planet1 
Earth has a population of 7874965825.

/org/sdbuscpp/examplemanager/Planet1/Trantor added: 
org.sdbuscpp.ExampleManager.Planet1 
Trantor has a population of 400.

/org/sdbuscpp/examplemanager/Planet1/Laconia added: 
org.sdbuscpp.ExampleManager.Planet1 
Laconia has a population of 231721.

/org/sdbuscpp/examplemanager/Planet1/Earth removed:
org.sdbuscpp.ExampleManager.Planet1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdbus-cpp/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951314] [NEW] [BPO] Please backport tpm2-tss-engine 1.1.0-2 (universe) from jammy

2021-11-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
Public bug reported:

[Impact]

There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the tpm2-tss-engine 
package.
The library is available in jammy, but not in focal.
It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
be used out of the box.

[Scope]

Backport from 22.04 jammy to 20.04 focal-backports

[Other Info]
The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade debhelper-compat 
from 13 to 12 in debian/control. Everything else works out of the box. Tested 
on a focal image:

root@focal:~# tpm2tss-genkey /tmp/key -t device:/dev/tpmrm0  -v
Engine name: TPM2-TSS engine for OpenSSL
Init result: 1 
Generating the key
Generating RSA key using TPM
Key generated
Writing key to disk
*** SUCCESS ***

PPA build:

https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/tpm2-tss-engine

** Affects: tpm2-tss-engine (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951314

Title:
  [BPO] Please backport tpm2-tss-engine 1.1.0-2 (universe) from jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tpm2-tss-engine/+bug/1951314/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

2021-11-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
> Do you have upload rights to upload the backported package, or is a
sponsor going to prepare and upload for you? I think @paelzer's team is
doing the work for you right?

That's right - I do not have uploaders rights, so I just pushed to the
linked PPA to show it works

** No longer affects: focal-backports

** Also affects: focal-backports
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** No longer affects: focal-backports

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sdbus-cpp/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

2021-11-17 Thread Luca Boccassi
I have updated the text and title, but I can't click on reopen for some
reason, it's greyed out - could you please reopen it? Thanks!

** Description changed:

- Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute to focal.
+ Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish to focal-
+ backports.
  
- Reason for the backport:
- 
+ [Impact]
+ 
  There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the sdbus-cpp 
library.
  The library is available in hirsute and bullseye, but not in focal.
  It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
  be used out of the box. The alternative for the project team would be to
  vendor the dependency, but this would also apply to newer releases where the
  library is available, which means the security and maintainability would take
  a hit.
  
- Testing:
- 
- The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
+ [Scope]
+ 
+ Backport from 21.10 impish to 20.04 focal-backports
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control. Everything else works out of 
the box.
  
  PPA build:
  
  https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
- 
- * focal:
- [ ] Package builds without modification
- [x] libsdbus-c++0 installs cleanly and runs
- [x] libsdbus-c++-dev installs cleanly and runs
- [x] libsdbus-c++-doc installs cleanly and runs
- [x] libsdbus-c++-bin installs cleanly and runs
- [x] libsdbus-c++0-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs
- [x] libsdbus-c++-bin-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs

** Description changed:

- Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish to focal-
- backports.
- 
  [Impact]
  
  There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the sdbus-cpp 
library.
  The library is available in hirsute and bullseye, but not in focal.
  It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
  be used out of the box. The alternative for the project team would be to
  vendor the dependency, but this would also apply to newer releases where the
  library is available, which means the security and maintainability would take
  a hit.
  
  [Scope]
  
  Backport from 21.10 impish to 20.04 focal-backports
  
  [Other Info]
  The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control. Everything else works out of 
the box.
  
  PPA build:
  
  https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages

** Summary changed:

- Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute
+ [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  [BPO] Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-4 (universe) from impish

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/focal-backports/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

2021-11-04 Thread Luca Boccassi
** No longer affects: anbox (Ubuntu)

** Summary changed:

- Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 
(universe) from hirsute
+ Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

** Description changed:

- Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) from hirsute to
- focal.
- 
- Reason for the backport:
- 
- Doing development and testing for modern Android requires newer versions of 
anbox. The upstream maintainer of anbox confirmed it would be a good idea to 
make a newer version available via focal-backports, so that developers like us 
can make use of it.
- 
- Testing:
- 
- The only source change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
- A newer version of src:sdbus-cpp and src:cpu-features are required too.
- 
- * focal:
- [ ] Package builds without modification
- [x] anbox installs cleanly and runs
- 
- No reverse dependencies
- 
- 
- -
- 
- 
  Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute to focal.
  
  Reason for the backport:
  
  There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the sdbus-cpp 
library.
  The library is available in hirsute and bullseye, but not in focal.
  It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
  be used out of the box. The alternative for the project team would be to
  vendor the dependency, but this would also apply to newer releases where the
  library is available, which means the security and maintainability would take
  a hit.
  
  Testing:
  
  The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
  
  PPA build:
  
  https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
  
  * focal:
  [ ] Package builds without modification
  [x] libsdbus-c++0 installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-dev installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-doc installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++0-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs

** No longer affects: groovy-backports

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/focal-backports/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875015] Re: Ubuntu 20.04 and Displaylink is extremely slow

2021-10-21 Thread Luca Capra
Hi, I am on 21.10 with intel driver and latest displaylink from their
website. Everything used to work decently until a couple of day ago when
I started seeing the external monitor very slow. I was on 21.04 and
after  an update it has started being slow.

1. It is slower when more things change on the screen, only the mouse works 
slow a full screen rendering is unusably slow.
2. on the login screen the screen works very well, as I was used to.
3. Audio work fine, rendering is very slow

About my pc

1. Linux vin 5.13.0-20-generic #20-Ubuntu SMP Fri Oct 15 14:21:35 UTC 2021 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
2. Driver from display link displaylink-driver-5.4.1-55.174
3. Tried X11 and Wayland from GDM with Gnome

I tried to troubleshoot as described here
https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DisplayLink and setting
LIBGL_DRI3_DISABLE=true as said here but it does not change

Any hint is appreciated! 
Thank you

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875015

Title:
  Ubuntu 20.04 and Displaylink is extremely slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nouveau/+bug/1875015/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1946911] [NEW] gdm3 cannot login to plasma wayland on nvidia 470.63.01

2021-10-12 Thread Luiz Angelo Daros de Luca
Public bug reported:

Hello,

My KDE wayland session does work if I launch it from CLI using 
startplasma-wayland.
However, when I login from gdm3, I got some form of session crashes and I am 
back to gdm3 screen a couple of seconds after I inform my password.

The X11 session is working as expected. The weirdest thing is that
"plasma wayland from gdm3" will work after I log, at least once in that
system uptime, to a plasma-x11 session. Something like this:

system boot
log to plasma (wayland) from gdm3
after some screen blinks, I'm back to gdm3
log to plasma (wayland) from gdm3
after some screen blinks, I'm back to gdm3
log to plasma (wayland) from gdm3
after some screen blinks, I'm back to gdm3
log to plasma (x11) from gdm3
session is good
logout
log to plasma (wayland) from gdm3
session is good

It looks like "plasma x11" left something configured/running that allows
a following wayland session to run.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: plasma-workspace-wayland 4:5.22.5-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CurrentDesktop: KDE
Date: Wed Oct 13 00:56:38 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-12-08 (1404 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Release amd64 (20171018)
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
SourcePackage: plasma-workspace
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to impish on 2021-10-10 (3 days ago)

** Affects: plasma-workspace (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946911

Title:
  gdm3 cannot login to plasma wayland on nvidia 470.63.01

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/+bug/1946911/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] Re: Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no disk space in /boot

2021-09-22 Thread luca moscato
Still Incomplete or need other info?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524090/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] GsettingsChanges.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "GsettingsChanges.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524089/+files/GsettingsChanges.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] DpkgTerminalLog.txt.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.txt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524088/+files/DpkgTerminalLog.txt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] DpkgHistoryLog.txt.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "DpkgHistoryLog.txt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524087/+files/DpkgHistoryLog.txt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] Dependencies.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524086/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] CurrentDmesg.txt.txt

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122/+attachment/5524085/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] Re: Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no disk space in /boot

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected

** Description changed:

  Environment: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS installed, more or less, day 1 since
  release
  
  I saw this issue a couple of times on my colleagues notebook but since
  happens also to me I gather some additional info. I usually update my
  sistem with command line since I have to do other stuff before starting
  my job (fix routes for my vpn, store my ssh key password with ssh-add,
  and others); update process is part of these commands as daily activity.
  
  Today I ran it via Software Updates, I was distracted and the Ubuntu
  friendly software kind reminds me to update my system, so that I proceed
  in that way but a pop up appears (sorry for italian) alerting me that
  there is no space left in /boot to update the kernel and I should have
  type 'sudo apt autoremove' to fix the issue. Don't know if this is
  related about 4 kernels I have installed
  
  Lettura file "/etc/default/grub.d/init-select.cfg"
  Generazione file di configurazione GRUB...
  Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-34-generic
  Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-34-generic
  Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-27-generic
  Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-27-generic
  Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-63-generic
  Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-63-generic
  Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-58-generic
  Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-58-generic
  Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Settings
  fatto
  Rimozione di linux-modules-5.11.0-25-generic (5.11.0-25.27~20.04.1)...
  
  Obviously running the usual
  sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
  hasn't any issue and
  sudo apt autoremove
  cleaned up perfeclty more or less 400MB of disk space.
  
  Below the update details:
  
  luca@ubuntu:~$ apt list --upgradable
  Elencazione... Fatto
  alsa-ucm-conf/focal-updates,focal-updates 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.10 all [aggiornabile 
da: 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.9]
  cpio/focal-updates,focal-security 2.13+dfsg-2ubuntu0.3 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 2.13+dfsg-2]
  fonts-opensymbol/focal,focal 2:102.12+LibO7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 2:102.12+LibO7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libgd3/focal-updates,focal-security 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2.1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2]
  libreoffice-base-core/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-calc/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-common/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-core/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-draw/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-gnome/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-gtk3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-help-common/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-help-en-us/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-help-it/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-impress/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-l10n-it/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-math/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-ogltrans/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-pdfimport/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-style-breeze/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-style-colibre/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-style-elementary/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-style-yaru/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libreoffice-writer/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libuno-cppu3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
  libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0

[Bug 1943122] Re: Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no disk space in /boot

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
If additional info are required please advise (and tell me how to
retrieve it). I tried the command ubuntu-bug update-manager but it
requires me to open a new bug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943122

Title:
  Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no
  disk space in /boot

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1943122/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943122] [NEW] Software update doesn't run autoremove so that update fails due to no disk space in /boot

2021-09-09 Thread luca moscato
Public bug reported:

Environment: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS installed, more or less, day 1 since
release

I saw this issue a couple of times on my colleagues notebook but since
happens also to me I gather some additional info. I usually update my
sistem with command line since I have to do other stuff before starting
my job (fix routes for my vpn, store my ssh key password with ssh-add,
and others); update process is part of these commands as daily activity.

Today I ran it via Software Updates, I was distracted and the Ubuntu
friendly software kind reminds me to update my system, so that I proceed
in that way but a pop up appears (sorry for italian) alerting me that
there is no space left in /boot to update the kernel and I should have
type 'sudo apt autoremove' to fix the issue. Don't know if this is
related about 4 kernels I have installed

Lettura file "/etc/default/grub.d/init-select.cfg"
Generazione file di configurazione GRUB...
Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-34-generic
Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-34-generic
Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.11.0-27-generic
Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-27-generic
Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.8.0-63-generic
Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-63-generic
Trovata immagine linux: /boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-58-generic
Trovata immagine initrd: /boot/initrd.img-5.4.0-58-generic
Adding boot menu entry for UEFI Firmware Settings
fatto
Rimozione di linux-modules-5.11.0-25-generic (5.11.0-25.27~20.04.1)...

Obviously running the usual
sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade
hasn't any issue and
sudo apt autoremove
cleaned up perfeclty more or less 400MB of disk space.

Below the update details:

luca@ubuntu:~$ apt list --upgradable
Elencazione... Fatto
alsa-ucm-conf/focal-updates,focal-updates 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.10 all [aggiornabile 
da: 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.9]
cpio/focal-updates,focal-security 2.13+dfsg-2ubuntu0.3 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
2.13+dfsg-2]
fonts-opensymbol/focal,focal 2:102.12+LibO7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 2:102.12+LibO7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libgd3/focal-updates,focal-security 2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2.1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
2.2.5-5.2ubuntu2]
libreoffice-base-core/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-calc/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-common/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-core/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-draw/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-gnome/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-gtk3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-help-common/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-help-en-us/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-help-it/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-impress/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-l10n-it/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-math/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-ogltrans/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-pdfimport/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-style-breeze/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-style-colibre/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-style-elementary/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-style-yaru/focal,focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 all 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libreoffice-writer/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile 
da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libuno-cppu3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 [aggiornabile da: 
1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1]
libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3/focal 1:7.1.6~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.1~lo1 amd64 
[aggiornabile da: 1:7.1.5~rc2-0ubuntu0.20.04.

[Bug 1930629] Re: Raspberry pi 4 USB controller randomly crashes

2021-09-08 Thread Luca Carlon
Any news about this critical issue? This bug causes data corruption,
instability of the system and loss of remote control of the system (a
reboot can deadlock the system before ssh is up).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930629

Title:
  Raspberry pi 4 USB controller randomly crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1930629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1930629] Re: Raspberry pi 4 USB controller randomly crashes

2021-08-27 Thread Luca Carlon
I have been testing the patches for 6 days now. No deadlock yet. I
typically had deadlocks in 2 hours to 3 days, but even weeks in some
cases.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930629

Title:
  Raspberry pi 4 USB controller randomly crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1930629/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1938983] Re: missing modules after 5.11.0-25-generic update

2021-08-24 Thread Luca Ferroni
Bug affects also to me in upgrading to 5.11.0-27

~$ lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
Release:20.04
Codename:   focal

The solution proposed by @MikeR works for me:

I have created a file t.txt with missing modules with the base
LinuxFromScratch URL: https://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/sources/linux-
firmware/i915/

and then

~$ cd /lib/firmware/i915/
/lib/firmware/i915$ cat ~/tmp/t.txt | while read a; do sudo wget $a; done
/lib/firmware/i915$ sudo update-initramfs -u -k all
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-27-generic
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.11.0-25-generic
update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-5.8.0-63-generic

Thank you all guys, maybe files should be integrated in `linux-firmware`
package? Can any janitor confirm pls so me or someone of my FSUG can try
to propose a patch for the package itself?

** Attachment added: "My list of "probably missing modules". BEWARE your list 
can be different!"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1938983/+attachment/5520102/+files/t.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1938983

Title:
  missing modules after 5.11.0-25-generic update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1938983/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1926876] Re: issues upgrading from 18.04.05 LTS to 20.04.02

2021-07-14 Thread Luca Magnaguagno
Hello,
yes, I managed to successfully complete the update.

thanks
Luca

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:11 PM Brian Murray <1926...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Thanks for taking the time to report this upgrade failure. There is
> currently a new version of the release upgrader available in -proposed
> which may resolve the error you've encountered. Please run the following
> command to test the new version of the upgrader:
>
>   do-release-upgrade -p
>
> Please lets us know the results in this bug report. Thanks again and
> good luck!
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
> ** Tags added: lp-1928397
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926876
>
> Title:
>   issues upgrading from 18.04.05 LTS to 20.04.02
>
> Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   $ cat /var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log | grep Holding
> Holding Back libpython2-stdlib:amd64 rather than change
> libpython-stdlib:amd64
> Holding Back python2-minimal:amd64 rather than change
> python-minimal:amd64
> Holding Back python2:amd64 rather than change python2-minimal:amd64
> Holding Back python-gi:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-six:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-gobject-2:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-pkg-resources:amd64 rather than change
> python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-dbus:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-cairo:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-cryptography:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-ipaddress:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-enum34:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-pyasn1:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-xdg:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-html5lib:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-chardet:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-openssl:amd64 rather than change
> python-cryptography:amd64
> Holding Back python-idna:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-lxml:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-bs4:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-httplib2:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-attr:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-webencodings:amd64 rather than change
> python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-olefile:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-zope.interface:amd64 rather than change
> python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-crypto:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-pil:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-gobject:amd64 rather than change python-gi:amd64
> Holding Back python-blinker:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-hyperlink:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-pam:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-constantly:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-automat:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-debian:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-pyasn1-modules:amd64 rather than change
> python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-service-identity:amd64 rather than change
> python2:any:any
> Holding Back libfaudio0:i386 rather than change libavcodec58:i386
> Holding Back python-gi-cairo:amd64 rather than change python-gi:amd64
> Holding Back python-monotonic:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-entrypoints:amd64 rather than change
> python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-xapian:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-setuptools:amd64 rather than change
> python-pkg-resources:amd64
> Holding Back python-gdbm:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-soupsieve:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-libxml2:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-ptyprocess:amd64 rather than change python2:any:any
> Holding Back python-keyring:amd64 rather than change
> python-entrypoints:amd64
> Holding Back python-numpy:amd64 rather than change python2:amd64
> Holding Back python-dateutil:amd64 rather than change python2:an

[Bug 1916068] Re: Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

2021-07-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Description changed:

+ Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) from hirsute to
+ focal.
+ 
+ Reason for the backport:
+ 
+ Doing development and testing for modern Android requires newer versions of 
anbox. The upstream maintainer of anbox confirmed it would be a good idea to 
make a newer version available via focal-backports, so that developers like us 
can make use of it.
+ 
+ Testing:
+ 
+ The only source change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
+ A newer version of src:sdbus-cpp and src:cpu-features are required too.
+ 
+ PPA build:
+ 
+ https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
+ 
+ * focal:
+ [ ] Package builds without modification
+ [x] anbox installs cleanly and runs
+ 
+ No reverse dependencies
+ 
+ 
  Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute to focal.
  
  Reason for the backport:
  
  There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the sdbus-cpp 
library.
  The library is available in hirsute and bullseye, but not in focal.
  It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
  be used out of the box. The alternative for the project team would be to
  vendor the dependency, but this would also apply to newer releases where the
  library is available, which means the security and maintainability would take
  a hit.
  
  Testing:
  
- The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade debhelper-compat
- from 13 to 12.
+ The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
  
  PPA build:
  
  https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
  
  * focal:
  [ ] Package builds without modification
  [x] libsdbus-c++0 installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-dev installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-doc installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++0-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs
- 
- No reverse dependencies

** Description changed:

  Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) from hirsute to
  focal.
  
  Reason for the backport:
  
  Doing development and testing for modern Android requires newer versions of 
anbox. The upstream maintainer of anbox confirmed it would be a good idea to 
make a newer version available via focal-backports, so that developers like us 
can make use of it.
  
  Testing:
  
  The only source change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
  A newer version of src:sdbus-cpp and src:cpu-features are required too.
  
- PPA build:
- 
- https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
- 
  * focal:
  [ ] Package builds without modification
  [x] anbox installs cleanly and runs
  
  No reverse dependencies
- 
  
  Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute to focal.
  
  Reason for the backport:
  
  There is an upcoming Azure-related project that would like to support Ubuntu
  20.04 LTS out of the box, and one of the requirements is the sdbus-cpp 
library.
  The library is available in hirsute and bullseye, but not in focal.
  It would be great if it could be uploaded to focal-backports, so that it can
  be used out of the box. The alternative for the project team would be to
  vendor the dependency, but this would also apply to newer releases where the
  library is available, which means the security and maintainability would take
  a hit.
  
  Testing:
  
  The only change needed to get a working build is to downgrade 
debhelper-compat from 13 to 12 in debian/control.
  
  PPA build:
  
  https://launchpad.net/~bluca/+archive/ubuntu/sdbus-cpp/+packages
  
  * focal:
  [ ] Package builds without modification
  [x] libsdbus-c++0 installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-dev installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-doc installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++0-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs
  [x] libsdbus-c++-bin-dbgsym installs cleanly and runs

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp
  0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/focal-backports/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1916068] Re: Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

2021-07-01 Thread Luca Boccassi
** Also affects: anbox (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sdbus-cpp (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Summary changed:

- Please backport sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute
+ Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (universe) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 
(universe) from hirsute

** Summary changed:

- Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (universe) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 
(universe) from hirsute
+ Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp 0.8.3-3 
(universe) from hirsute

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916068

Title:
  Please backport anbox 0.0~git20210106-1 (multiverse) and sdbus-cpp
  0.8.3-3 (universe) from hirsute

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/focal-backports/+bug/1916068/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1928161] Re: Wacom Tablet Map Buttons blank on Wayland

2021-06-05 Thread Luca Donetti
I find the same behavior shown in the screenshot.

Steps to reproduce the bug:
1. Connect my wacom tablet (by bluetooth).
2. Open "Settings"-"Wacom Tablet".
3. Select "Tablet".
4. Click on "Map Buttons..." button.

The behavior I expected.
Something that would allow me to configure the behavior of the buttons on the 
tablet

The behavior I encounter every time I repeat the previous steps.
A screen as in the attached screenshot appears, where is it not clear how I can 
configure anything. Clicking on the tablet button does not have any visible 
effect, pressing "Esc" does not allow to exit the screen. The only way I found 
to exit from this situation is to switch off the tablet: I could not find how 
to get out by pressing any key or clicking anywhere.

In this situation I cannot execute the suggested apport-collect command
because I cannot do anything useful until I switch off the tablet. Would
it still be useful if I execute it whwn the screen of the screenshot is
not active?

My tablet is different from the one mentioned in the bug (Wacom Intuos
BT S) but the behavior is the same. Should I open a new bug?

I can add that I find the same behavior under Wayland and under X,
however the consequences of the bug are worse in Wayland because in X I
can configure the buttons using a script based on xsetwacom.

Is there any additional information I can add to help debug the issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1928161

Title:
  Wacom Tablet Map Buttons blank on Wayland

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1928161/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1922353] Re: Overview sometimes fails to appear or disappear in gnome-shell 3.38

2021-06-04 Thread Luca Bellinzaghi
Hello

tested package: gnome-shell
version: 3.38.4-1ubuntu3~21.04.1

Machine: Lenovo ThinkPad T430

root@TP-T430:~# uname -r
5.11.0-18-generic

root@TP-T430:~# apt-cache policy gnome-shell| grep Install
  Installato: 3.38.4-1ubuntu3~21.04.1


steps undertaken to test:

1. Log into GNOME.
2. Press Super+A
3. Click on 'Files' and wait till it has launched.
4. Press the Super key.

Expected: Can interact with the application window.

Result: I can interact with the system as expected.

This release fixed the bug for me.

Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1922353

Title:
  Overview sometimes fails to appear or disappear in gnome-shell 3.38

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/1922353/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >