[Bug 943195] Re: xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash()
Any chance the fix gets backported to Raring? Evince is hella sluggish on my 50+ pages of LaTeX'd research notes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/943195 Title: xpdf.real crashed with SIGSEGV in GooHash::hash() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xpdf/+bug/943195/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483455] Re: [ghci] HOME, END, DELETE and BACKSPACE keys input garbage instead of being interpreted - libedit-dev missing in ghc6 =6.10's build-deps
!! Thanks a lot — this has been driving me nuts :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483455 Title: [ghci] HOME, END, DELETE and BACKSPACE keys input garbage instead of being interpreted - libedit-dev missing in ghc6 =6.10's build-deps -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 431091] Re: libstdc++5 removal breaks non-ubuntu applications
This also breaks Eclipse *as packaged by Ubuntu*, since the profiling tools require a native binary that gets linked against libstdc++5. So it's not even sufficient to avoid non-Ubuntu applications to be safe from the repercussions of this decision. Moreover, I suspect a lot of people are affected by this and don't know it, as it took some investigation to find this as the root cause; at the outset, all I could tell was that the profiler was broken. (The profiling tools are an add-on, but they're an official part of the Eclipse project and can be installed entirely from the GUI, as supported by Ubuntu's Eclipse packaging, so it's not unreasonable to expect this to work.) ** Also affects: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- libstdc++5 removal breaks non-ubuntu applications https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/431091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43162] Re: eclipse.ini file should be moved to /etc
It's a particularly nasty policy violation, given that AFAICT there is no longer any way for the user to override /usr/lib/eclipse/eclipse.ini using anything in ~/.eclipse/ . Neither ~/.eclipse/eclipserc (as claimed by the eclipse manpage) nor ~/.eclipse/eclipse.ini is honored these days (a bit of Googling suggests they were at some point). -- eclipse.ini file should be moved to /etc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43162 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449414] Re: The Installer does not see existing partitions
!! I thought to try installing Jaunty instead and upgrading to Karmic, but I found the problem is still there in the Jaunty installer's partitioner. What's more, on the Jaunty LiveCD, gparted has the same problem! Is that any kind of hint? (If I run parted in the terminal and try to list partitions, it just says Error: Unable to satisfy all constraints on the partition.) So Zett, did you ever try it with Jaunty? If we are indeed seeing the same bug, this strongly suggests it's not the kernel after all. -- The Installer does not see existing partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449414] Re: The Installer does not see existing partitions
Just did some Googling, and it looks like the key for me was that I used fdisk to fix the partition order. Did you ever do that on that disk? Reportedly it screws up parted ... good to know ... Ah! Just now tried deleting the last partition with fdisk and reallocating it. Seems it really was too close to the previous one. (Fortunately it was a swap partition, so I didn't have to worry about the data.) So I guess the lesson for me is not to use that reorder command in fdisk on logical partitions; you wind up with overlap. (Now to complain to the parted guys; I wish it'd just create the partitions in the right order to begin with, no matter what order I define them in ...) Does that help, Zett? -- The Installer does not see existing partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 449414] Re: The Installer does not see existing partitions
I'm seeing exactly the same symptoms on regular (non-K) Ubuntu, only I'd just partitioned the disk using gparted (and fdisk, to fix the partition order). Also, I've got Windows XP running on an NTFS partition (which I'd just resized). I can attach those logs if it'd help. Is there a workaround? I'd love to be rid of Windows on this damned machine ... -- The Installer does not see existing partitions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449414 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28
Huh. My system's also a single-core Athlon 64, and I'm getting it even worse (a single rm hangs). Is it possible that this is a race condition that's *more* likely on a single-core box? Seems like we've exhausted every other theory :-) -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28
Roland Dreier wrote: Luke Maurer wrote: I've been able to reproduce it 100% reliably (rm a single file = crashy crashy) just in the Jaunty LiveCD environment. AFAIK, the most exotic filesystem hackery it uses is that union filesystem, though I was crashing on deleting something on a separate, non-unionized volume. Can you give a recipe for how you're able to reproduce it with the Jaunty Live CD? Um, the rm command? :-) Seriously, I boot it up, mount an ext4 volume on a garden-variety disk partition, and try to delete a file. It hangs (evidently *after* deleting the file). Every time. (I'm pretty sure I tried an ext4 image mounted over loopback as well, to no avail.) I realize it's a decidedly extreme case of the bug, but besides the ease of reproduction, the symptoms are identical to those reported here. - Luke -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28
On Sun, 2009-07-05 at 23:32 +, Theodore Ts'o wrote: We might have a break in this bug. For those people who can reliably reproduce the problem, are you using ecryptfs, possibly extensively? I've been able to reproduce it 100% reliably (rm a single file = crashy crashy) just in the Jaunty LiveCD environment. AFAIK, the most exotic filesystem hackery it uses is that union filesystem, though I was crashing on deleting something on a separate, non-unionized volume. -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 330824] Re: Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28
@Ulrich: Are you sure none of those operations involved deleting files? The usual symptom is that the system hangs *after* the rm is successful, so that's not out of character. SVN does some amount of file-based locking, IIUC, which means at some point it has to rm the lock file. Creating a tarball shouldn't remove anything - but surfing the Web may very well, if the cache is full and it has to start clearing out old entries. And I know that it's not in *all* cases that heavy load is important - as I'm encountering the bug, ANY rm freezes the system every single time. @DanielV: Are they on the same volume? If not, then mv = cp + rm, no? -- Soft lockups (freezes) when deleting files from ext4 partitions on 2.6.28 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264019] Re: TCP option ordering in 2.6.27 is not interoperable with some network equipment
Ugh ... my bad. It's a userspace problem; I just booted into the Hardy kernel and it's still broken ... so nevermind. -- TCP option ordering in 2.6.27 is not interoperable with some network equipment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 264019] Re: TCP option ordering in 2.6.27 is not interoperable with some network equipment
I'm seeing a rather bizarre variant of this. I just upgraded my masquerading home server to Intrepid, and now browsing from the server itself works fine, but browsing from *other* machines does not, including both my Intrepid desktop machine and my iPhone. Very similar symptoms - if I'm reading tshark right, the request goes out (and sometimes even gets ACK'd) but the HTTP response never materializes. Setting either tcp_timestamps or tcp_sack to 0 doesn't help, and I just upgraded yesterday so everything should be up to date. -- TCP option ordering in 2.6.27 is not interoperable with some network equipment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201711] Re: Apple fn key behavior isn't consistent with what's expected
I'd also like to add that MacOS X allows a choice of behaviors; out of the box, they're special keys by default (after all, they were designed for Mac use, and there's an Exposé key and a Dashboard key to prove it), but that can be turned off, and the MacBook fanatics I know have set them to being F-keys by default. So it's not universal that Mac guys will expect the keys to have the special meaning (especially as the Exposé and Dashboard keys don't mean much to a vanilla Ubuntu install). Also, it's not the case that only Mac guys will use these keyboards. I'm not a Mac guy, and I'm typing on one right now :-) (It is quite pertinent to the discussion to note the unmistakable fact that these keyboards are frickin' *sweet*.) -- Apple fn key behavior isn't consistent with what's expected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188857] [NEW] CHR library missing
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: swi-prolog Gutsy's packaging is missing the CHR library: ?- use_module(library(chr)). ERROR: source_sink `library(chr)' does not exist This seems similar to #81561 and #90031; the latter, if not the former as well, is inherited from Debian's packaging. ** Affects: swi-prolog (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- CHR library missing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 160942] Re: Ugly gtk theme buttons in web content in Granparadiso
Anyone know if this is fixed by the upstream beta 2 release? -- Ugly gtk theme buttons in web content in Granparadiso https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160942 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138222] Re: Please sync Coq 8.1pl1
Oh, uh ... yeah. Looks like this happened without my needing to whine about it :-) Sorry about the spam. ** Changed in: coq (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Please sync Coq 8.1pl1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 138222] Please sync Coq 8.1pl1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: coq Current Debian unstable version is 8.1.pl1+dfsg-1 (just a version bump from 8.1+dfsg-6). ** Affects: coq (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please sync Coq 8.1pl1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/138222 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97643] Re: evdev mice: Fatal server error:bogus pointer event from ddx
FWIW, I'm having the same problem, but a different reason for not liking the static configuration solution: My keyboard's got a scroll wheel, so it's both keyboard and pointer. Yes, I *can* set this up statically, but it's far more sensible to avoid the keyboard/mouse dichotomy in the first place. There are other bugs involving inconsistencies between event types and input devices; I'd say it's better to quit pretending that keyboards and mice are always inherently different. (Besides, that's what's so nifty about Linux's evdev mechanism anyway - it abstracts the events from the originating devices.) -- evdev mice: Fatal server error:bogus pointer event from ddx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 97643] Re: evdev mice: Fatal server error:bogus pointer event from ddx
FWIW, I'm having the same problem, but a different reason for not liking the static configuration solution: My keyboard's got a scroll wheel, so it's both keyboard and pointer. Yes, I *can* set this up statically, but it's far more sensible to avoid the keyboard/mouse dichotomy in the first place. There are other bugs involving inconsistencies between event types and input devices; I'd say it's better to quit pretending that keyboards and mice are always inherently different. (Besides, that's what's so nifty about Linux's evdev mechanism anyway - it abstracts the events from the originating devices.) -- evdev mice: Fatal server error:bogus pointer event from ddx https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97643 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 77675] Re: apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty
So, I take it Feisty is shipping with this bug still open? There're gonna be a lot of people wondering why all the Apache2/SSL tutorials are broken ... -- apache2-ssl-certificate has gone missing in feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/77675 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78103] Re: VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file
I get the same error, with the same versions, but on an AMD64 box; also, it always segfaults the very first time I try to seek. I'm attaching two crash files: One is from wxvlc, the other from vlc (same problem). ** Attachment added: wxvlc crash file http://librarian.launchpad.net/5789308/_usr_bin_wxvlc.1000.crash -- VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file https://launchpad.net/bugs/78103 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78103] Re: VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file
This one has a core dump (not sure why only it does, but there it is). ** Attachment added: vlc crash file, with core dump http://librarian.launchpad.net/5789314/_usr_bin_vlc.1000.crash -- VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file https://launchpad.net/bugs/78103 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 78103] Re: VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file
(er, they both do ... just the vlc one's twice as big for some reason) -- VLC crashes when seeking in a mkv file https://launchpad.net/bugs/78103 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79347] Unresolved symbol set_bit in evdev_drv.so crashes X (fixed upstream)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-input-evdev If I have xorg.conf set to use evdev, X fails to run, giving this error: /usr/bin/X11/X: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib/xorg/modules/input/evdev_drv.so: undefined symbol: set_bit My evdev settings are these: Section InputDevice Identifier All Mice Driver evdev Option CorePointer Option evBits +1-2 Option keyBits ~272-287 Option relBits ~0-2 ~6 ~8 EndSection I believe this is the same bug as Debian #395510 (http://bugs.debian.org /cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=395510), which has been fixed there. ** Affects: xserver-xorg-input-evdev (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- Unresolved symbol set_bit in evdev_drv.so crashes X (fixed upstream) https://launchpad.net/bugs/79347 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 79347] Re: Unresolved symbol set_bit in evdev_drv.so crashes X (fixed upstream)
I just found that if I comment out the *Bits settings and instead specify a device by name, it runs happily (though that's not my preferred solution). -- Unresolved symbol set_bit in evdev_drv.so crashes X (fixed upstream) https://launchpad.net/bugs/79347 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 68053] Re: Eclipse will not start (Edgy)
Tom's instructions worked for me. BTW, in bug #68380 it's suggested that this fix be run by the release team to get it into edgy-proposed - anyone know how to get that particular ball rolling? -- Eclipse will not start (Edgy) https://launchpad.net/bugs/68053 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
