[Bug 1912859] [NEW] package libsane 1.0.29-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2
Public bug reported: tried to get rhythmbox to access music on NAS via Firefly media server and crashed. probably too much music to load in one file as i have more than 100gb of music. Cant access it thru Itunes server either. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: libsane 1.0.29-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.8.0-40.45~20.04.1-generic 5.8.18 Uname: Linux 5.8.0-40-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.14 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip Date: Thu Jan 21 14:07:22 2021 ErrorMessage: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2 InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-01-21 (1 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.1 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20200731) Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.5, python3-minimal, 3.8.2-0ubuntu2 PythonDetails: N/A RelatedPackageVersions: dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3 apt 2.0.4 SourcePackage: sane-backends Title: package libsane 1.0.29-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: sane-backends (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1912859 Title: package libsane 1.0.29-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: dpkg-deb --fsys-tarfile subprocess returned error exit status 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1912859/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 868841] Re: right-click/context menus freeze and won't go away
I'm still getting this with Chromium (Version 25.0.1364.160 Ubuntu 12.04 (25.0.1364.160-0ubuntu0.12.04.1)) running KDE. This only seems to happen when I have a large number of tabs open (about 150 at the moment, but I think I've seen it happen with less), having been running Chromium for over a day. I have put together an ugly fix for the problem of the persistent windows - the following is a shell script that uses xdotool to hide any window that is clicked. This means that the menu shadow can be hidden without closing Chromium. --- #!/bin/sh id=`wmctrl -v -r :SELECT: -e dummy 21 | grep Using.window | grep -o 0x[0-9a-fA-F]*` xdotool windowunmap $id --- This script requires wmctrl and xdotool, which can be installed via apt: sudo apt-get install wmctrl xdotool -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/868841 Title: right-click/context menus freeze and won't go away To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/868841/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
I am pleased to see that, yes, but I still don't understand what's going on. Here's the output of 'exiv2 test.jpg': for the first of two example images: hakonau@VOSTRO-ubuntu:~/Desktop$ exiv2 test.jpg Filnavn : test.jpg Fil størrelse : 662165 Byte MIME-type : image/jpeg Bildestørrelse : 2592 x 1944 Kameratype : Sony Ericsson Kameramodell: U20i Bildets tidsstempel: 2010:09:30 14:09:15 Image number: Lukketid: 1/60 s Aperture: Exposure bias : Flash : No flash Flash bias : Focal length: Avstand til motiv: ISO speed : 40 Exposure mode : Målemetode : Macro mode : Bildekvalitet : Exif Oppløsning: 2592 x 1944 Hvitbalanse : Automatisk Miniatyrbilde : Ingen Opphavsrett : Exif kommentar : It is Norwegian, but you can see the time stamp: 2010:09:30 14:09:15 Now for the other image, test2.jpg: hakonau@VOSTRO-ubuntu:~/Desktop$ exiv2 test2.jpg Filnavn : test2.jpg Fil størrelse : 3476572 Byte MIME-type : image/jpeg Bildestørrelse : 3072 x 2304 Kameratype : Samsung Techwin Kameramodell: KENOX S760 / Samsung S760 Bildets tidsstempel: 2009:03:08 16:03:21 Image number: Lukketid: 1/45 s Aperture: F3.1 Exposure bias : 0 EV Flash : Yes, auto, red-eye reduction Flash bias : Focal length: 8.1 mm (35 mm ekvivalent: 49.0 mm) Avstand til motiv: ISO speed : 100 Exposure mode : Automatisk Målemetode : Multi-segment Macro mode : Bildekvalitet : Exif Oppløsning: 3072 x 2304 Hvitbalanse : Automatisk Miniatyrbilde : Ingen Opphavsrett : COPYRIGHT, 2007 Exif kommentar : The first image is imported into F-spot using 10th of September 1930 as the date, the second one (correctly) uses 8th of March 2009. Luckily the metadata itself hasn't been corrupted this time, but I can't possibly go through 4,000 photos to check whether their correct date is 03-04-05 or 05-04-03. So even though I'm happy to hear that f-spot won't alter metadata anymore it was a little too late for me, I'm afraid :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 Title: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
I would... but my scripting skills aren't up for the task *blush* On 28. jan. 2011 23:18, Derek wrote: Well, going through 4,000 images sounds like a perfect task for a script. :) Just use exiftool or your thingy above, and if the dates are severely outside a certain range (like past 10 years) then swap the 2 digit year and the day and write it back, since it seems like that is what happened. I mean, in the interests of data recovery. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 Title: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
The real problem, of course, is that f-spot PERMANENTLY changes date information in pictures, thereby corrupting them. An example: 1. Picture 0001.JPG is taken on 29th of May 2010 (29-05-10) 2. Picture is imported into f-spot with option Copy to image folder Expected behaviour would be: - Place image in new folder: ~/Images/2010/05/29/0001.JPG But the real behaviour is: - Place image in new folder: ~/Images/2029/05/10/0001.JPG This will, in the cases where the corrupted year is too far in the future, crash F-spot and mess up your database. As if this isn't bad enough, f-spot will also PERMANENTLY alter the metadata information in 0001.JPG, so the date will still be corrupted even if you import your pictures into another program. Just a warning. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 Title: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
Thank you. I've been playing around with it, and it makes f-spot happy. But then again, ofcourse it doesn't change the info in the image file itself, it just mends the database (photos.db) so that f-spot won't hiccup. Perhaps f-spot should handle image files with time stamps wrongfully in the future in a more graceful way? I have this nagging feeling f-spot shifted the time of those photos in the first place, but I'm not intelligent enough to debug it. What I am researching now is a shell script that will conditionally set ALL date fields to a given time (say, todays date) if the existing one is in the future. -- F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
I suspect the error message and crash being due to some pictures in my database having date stamps in the future. Any quick fixes for adjusting dates in the future to, say, todays date then? -- F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
Output of f-spot --debug f-spot-debug.txt ** Attachment added: Output of f-spot --debug f-spot-debug.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/f-spot/+bug/636819/+attachment/1636228/+files/f-spot-debug.txt -- F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 636819] Re: F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue
I get this too, starting two days ago: En uhåndtert feil oppstod: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue at System.Convert.ToInt32 (Int64 value) [0x0] at System.Int64.System.IConvertible.ToInt32 (IFormatProvider provider) [0x0] at System.Convert.ToType (System.Object value, System.Type conversionType, IFormatProvider provider, Boolean try_target_to_type) [0x0] at System.Convert.ChangeType (System.Object value, System.Type conversionType, IFormatProvider provider) [0x0] at Mono.Data.Sqlite.Sqlite3.GetValue (Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteStatement stmt, Int32 index, Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteType typ) [0x0] at Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteDataReader.GetValue (Int32 i) [0x0] at Hyena.Data.Sqlite.HyenaSqliteArrayDataReader.ReadAllRows (Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteDataReader reader) [0x0] at Hyena.Data.Sqlite.HyenaSqliteArrayDataReader..ctor (Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteDataReader reader) [0x0] at (wrapper remoting-invoke-with-check) Hyena.Data.Sqlite.HyenaSqliteArrayDataReader:.ctor (Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteDataReader) at Hyena.Data.Sqlite.HyenaSqliteCommand.Execute (Hyena.Data.Sqlite.HyenaSqliteConnection hconnection, Mono.Data.Sqlite.SqliteConnection connection) [0x0] .NET Version: 2.0.50727.1433 OS Version: Unix 2.6.32.24 Assembly Version Information: Mono.Cairo (2.0.0.0) FSpot.Bling (0.7.0.0) TagLib (0.7.0.0) pango-sharp (2.12.0.0) FSpot.Query (0.7.0.0) gtk-sharp-beans (2.14.0.0) gnome-sharp (2.24.0.0) System.Transactions (2.0.0.0) System.Data (2.0.0.0) Mono.Data.Sqlite (0.7.0.0) Hyena.Data.Sqlite (0.7.0.0) FSpot.JobScheduler (0.7.0.0) System.Core (3.5.0.0) unique-sharp (1.0.0.0) System.Configuration (2.0.0.0) FSpot.Gui (0.7.0.0) System.Xml (2.0.0.0) Mono.Addins (0.4.0.0) gio-sharp (2.14.0.0) gconf-sharp (2.24.0.0) Hyena.Gui (0.7.0.0) atk-sharp (2.12.0.0) System (2.0.0.0) Mono.Addins.Setup (0.4.0.0) gtk-sharp (2.12.0.0) FSpot.Cms (0.7.0.0) FSpot.Core (0.7.0.0) FSpot.Platform (0.7.0.0) Mono.Posix (2.0.0.0) gdk-sharp (2.12.0.0) Hyena (0.7.0.0) glib-sharp (2.12.0.0) FSpot.Utils (0.7.0.0) f-spot (0.7.0.0) mscorlib (2.0.0.0) Platform Information: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686 unknown GNU/Linux Disribution Information: [/etc/lsb-release] DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04 DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS [/etc/debian_version] squeeze/sid -- F-spot error: Value is greater than Int32.MaxValue or less than Int32.MinValue https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/636819 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75358] Re: ad-hoc networks don't work with Intel wireless
Just wanted to keep this rolling towards a fix. I am experiencing the same issue with NM in Lucid. I am able to create an ad-hoc, users are able to connect, but there is no functionality. I am using a T40 with ipw2100 -- ad-hoc networks don't work with Intel wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507148] Re: [lucid] desktop runs out of video memory on ATI Radeon Mobility 7500
Sadly have to report that I have issues with Lucid and my Radeon 7500. Randomly the system goes black, shows some quick text (the only part I have caught says something like checking battery state) and I am prompted to log back in. Also, when booting up, the splash screen is in funky (maybe inverted?) colors. After login there is a fairly long wait till the desktop becomes visible. I have a Thinkpad T40, and had no issues with 9.04. Happy to help if I can in any way -- [lucid] desktop runs out of video memory on ATI Radeon Mobility 7500 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507148 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
