[Bug 1438448] [NEW] unity-greeter/lightdm creates another guest session when switching from guest to guest
Public bug reported: When someone tries to switch user from guest session and choose guest session second time, new guest user is created by guest-account script and new guest session is opened. It should switch back to already created guest session, instead of creating another one. Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Release:14.04 unity-greeter: Zainstalowana: 14.04.10-0ubuntu1 lightdm: Zainstalowana: 1.10.3-0ubuntu2 ** Affects: unity-greeter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438448 Title: unity-greeter/lightdm creates another guest session when switching from guest to guest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/1438448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1438448] Re: unity-greeter/lightdm creates another guest session when switching from guest to guest
After some consideration, if someone creates enough guest accounts, he/she will drain resources, e.g. RAM, system would crash and if swap space was in use (and not encrypted), then someone (with physical access) could boot into live cd/usb to analyze contents of RAM saved on swap partition. But it could be done easier in another way, then creating a lot of guest accounts. So do what you want with this bug report. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1438448 Title: unity-greeter/lightdm creates another guest session when switching from guest to guest To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/1438448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1420430] Re: Disconnect menu item in network-manager taskbar tool is inactive when connected to network
Installing older versions (from precise, instead of precise-updates) of ubuntu-desktop, unity-greeter, network-manager and network-manager-gnome works the charm too ;) Disconnecting from WiFi or wired was pain in... some part of the body, but disconnecting from Bluetooth PAN was almost impossible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1420430 Title: Disconnect menu item in network-manager taskbar tool is inactive when connected to network To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1420430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] Re: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
Extending this Linux packages example. What if some proprietary device driver called X? This driver is not from Linux source package, but every update of Linux will cause the need of rebuilding X's deb packages. Sources are independent but deb packages of X depends on Linux's deb packages. If you change RNG's probability distribution from uniform to normal, then probability distribution will stay normal, but parameters will change (e.g. average). You can compare this two m-files: uniform.m: figure(1) hist(rand(1,10),100,1) for i = 2:10 figure(i) hist(max(rand(i,10)),100,1) endfor normal.m: figure(1) hist(randn(1,10),100,1) for i = 2:10 figure(i) hist(max(randn(i,10)),100,1) endfor If you combine normal distribution with seeding RNG with (source package name, update version, client-machine-id), then this will keep number of random variables to low values and combined probability distribution will be closer to normal. In this scenario Linux's packages probability distribution will be normal (because it is independent) and X's will be like for i = 2 from 'normal.m' file. You can calculate parameters of probability distributions for dependent groups of deb packages (coming from the same source packages) using lists of installed packages from users that report bugs. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482 Title: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] Re: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
After some consideration - maybe real life scenario will be better. Regard Linux, Nvidia, ATI and some DVB-T dongle without driver in current kernel. There will be 6 groups of users: a) only Linux, (i=1) b) Linux and Nvidia, (i=2) c) Linux and ATI, (i=2) d) Linux and DVB-T dongle, (i=2) e) Linux, Nvidia and DVB-T dongle, (i=3) f) Linux, ATI and DVB-T dongle. (i=3) These are all kernel or kernel modules so they could share the same threshold value. You can calculate percentage of users for Linux-only using normal distribution and use it directly for group a), for other groups will be easy to calculate parameters of their distribution using the i value (number of random variables) and recalculate pristine threshold for all packages from b) to f) groups accordingly, then compare it with maximum value of random generated numbers for Linux, graphics and DVB-T. That way will be possible to determine percentage of users that installed newer versions of packages and this percentage can be equal for all groups (from a) to f)). The value of i can be estimated using list of installed packages for every user reporting bug. For other software packages it should be similar as for Linux example. I can be wrong, so correct me if you find any mistake. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482 Title: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] Re: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
Yeah, I forgot about this report. If (Pseudo)Random Number Generator is seeded that way, then in most cases this will be fine, only in bad-luck cases (when source packages are different but debs depends on each other) my analysis will apply. The good news is that, even if this situation occurs, the upgrade part of the process is fine, only the data analysis part must concern different probability distribution (when mapping number of bug reports to percentage of users). PS. Sorry for my English, I wasn't using it for a while... in last months. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482 Title: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] Re: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
The real probability distribution will be a sum of separate
distributions and will depend of fractions of user who installed i of n
packages. Below I pasted formula from LibO Math:
P(x)= sum from {i=1} to {n} a_i P_i(x) newline
0= a_i = 1 newline
a_i - a fraction of users who installed i packages from a group of n
dependent packages newline
to total amount of users who installed any number of packages from the same
group newline
P_i(x) - Probability distribution for i dependent packages
The real probability distribution will be hard to predict, so leaving
this as is is against the KISS paradigm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482
Title:
Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability
distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] [NEW] Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
Public bug reported: I assume that you decided for uniform distribution in the random number generator. If group of dependent packages is installed only when all phased-update-percentage values (for each package) are smaller than the present percentage on server - it will change probability distribution for the whole group of packages. Just run this: figure(1) hist(rand(1,10)) for i = 2:10 figure(i) hist(max(rand(i,10))) endfor in octave and look at histograms for i1 (i is the number of dependent packages). ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482 Title: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1214482] Re: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages.
For normalized histograms: figure(1) hist(rand(1,10),10,1) for i = 2:10 figure(i) hist(max(rand(i,10)),10,1) endfor If we're upgrading kernel, than packages are: linux-generic linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-libc-dev linux-headers-version linux-headers-version-generic linux-image-version-generic so for this group i=7 and for percentage 40% will be almost no bug reports ;) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1214482 Title: Not-grouping dependent packages in Phased Updates changes propability distribution for entire group of dependent packages. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1214482/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1184086] Re: HUD can't find LibO menu entries after print preview
Thank you for clarification. Can you tell me how to report bugs to this particular PPA? I can't see any report bug link there, only contact this team's admins. There are 3 bug reports, so it is possible. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184086 Title: HUD can't find LibO menu entries after print preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1184086/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1184086] [NEW] HUD can't find LibO menu entries after print preview
Public bug reported: Just after switch to print preview mode HUD cannot find any Libreoffice menu but menu is still working using mouse. When print preview is closed HUD is still blind. Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Release:12.04 libreoffice: Zainstalowana: 1:4.0.3-0ubuntu1~precise2 ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184086 Title: HUD can't find LibO menu entries after print preview To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1184086/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182082] Re: libreoffice menu not working
*-precise2 update works like a charm. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182082 Title: libreoffice menu not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1182082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182768] [NEW] menu does not work in writer, calc and impress in LibO 4.0.3.3 from libreoffice ppa (precise)
Public bug reported: Nothing happens after clicking on menu. Without libreoffice-gtk and libreoffice-gnome LibO looks ugly, but is working. LibO 4.0.2.2 was fine. `lsb_release -rd`: Description:Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Release:12.04 `apt-cache policy libreoffice`: libreoffice: Zainstalowana: 1:4.0.3-0ubuntu1~precise1 Kandydująca: 1:4.0.3-0ubuntu1~precise1 Tabela wersji: *** 1:4.0.3-0ubuntu1~precise1 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/ppa/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:3.5.7-0ubuntu4 0 500 http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-updates/main amd64 Packages 1:3.5.4-0ubuntu1.1 0 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise-security/main amd64 Packages 1:3.5.2-2ubuntu1 0 500 http://pl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main amd64 Packages ** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182768 Title: menu does not work in writer, calc and impress in LibO 4.0.3.3 from libreoffice ppa (precise) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1182768/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182082] Re: libreoffice menu not working
I'm using Libreoffice 4.0.3.3 on ubuntu 12.04.2 64-bit with 3.2.0 kernel (if it matters) and I reported a bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1182768 Menus are not blank but useless (there is only one submenu working - File - New - *). Menus are populated, but not working at all (even using dash). This bug is in every LibO window, not only in writer, calc and impress. Is it duplicate? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182082 Title: libreoffice menu not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/1182082/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1101899] Re: Installation of xorg-lts-quantal removes ia32-libs-multiarch
Actually is does remove for example: Następujące pakiety zostaną USUNIĘTE: acroread acroread-fonts google-earth-stable ia32-libs ia32-libs-multiarch:i386 libgl1-mesa-dri libgl1-mesa-dri:i386 libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-glx:i386 libglapi-mesa libglapi-mesa:i386 libglu1-mesa:i386 libqt4-opengl:i386 libvisual-0.4-plugins:i386 libxatracker1 playonlinux virtualbox-guest-x11 wine wine1.5 wine1.5-amd64 wine1.5-i386:i386 and similiar. Mesa packets and similiar will be installed again in lts-quantal version: Zostaną zainstalowane następujące NOWE pakiety: libgl1-mesa-dri-lts-quantal libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-quantal libglapi-mesa-lts-quantal libllvm3.1 libtxc-dxtn-s2tc0 libxatracker1-lts-quantal libxrandr-ltsq2 but acroread, google-earth, wine, playonlinux, etc. will be gone. Acroread and wine are huge and I don't want to download it again but I need them. PS. Sorry for my english. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1101899 Title: Installation of xorg-lts-quantal removes ia32-libs-multiarch To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1101899/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
