[Bug 1850358] [NEW] Add missing return value in liblas.hpp

2019-10-29 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

Missing return statement in include/liblas/liblas.hpp causes calls to
Open to always fail if liblas is compiled without Boost. As liblas
src/c_api.cpp does not handle Open failures (returning NULL instead of
throwing an exception), it causes a segfault in any application calling
LASReader_Create or LASReader_CreateWithHeader.

The issue has been resolved upstream[1], but any new releases
incorporating this patch seem to be unlikely[2].

1. https://github.com/libLAS/libLAS/pull/168
2. https://github.com/libLAS/libLAS/issues/146

Gentoo bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/698846

** Affects: liblas (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1850358

Title:
  Add missing return value in liblas.hpp

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/liblas/+bug/1850358/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1650634] Re: when installing systemd, it creates /run/nologin preventing all users from logging in.

2019-10-14 Thread Maris Nartiss
Graham, you could be hit by a different bug. (In my case it was fubared
NFS mount from fstab – turns out NFS mounts should be removed from fstab
before upgrades) You are interested in solving "pam_nologin should allow
sudoers to log in" – it is bug #1847902

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1650634

Title:
  when installing systemd, it creates /run/nologin preventing all users
  from logging in.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1650634/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1847902] [NEW] pam_nologin should optionally exclude users of the "wheel" group from its access restrictions

2019-10-13 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

During a remote system upgrade (18.04 to 19.04) something went south and after 
reboot the machine is stuck at some place in its boot sequence. SSH works, but 
trying to log-in with a sudo-capable user results in: "System is booting up. 
Unprivileged users are not permitted to log in yet. Please come back later. For 
technical details, see pam_nologin(8)."
As Ubuntu has moved away from full root users with passwords + allowing root 
logins over SSH, I'm totally locked out from my remote system.

There is a bug reported for pam_nologin requesting to provide separate
exclusion mechanism but in the meantime it is possible to implement a
workaround to exclude administrative users from nologin restriction.

Here's the bug:
https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/42

And here is the workaround that should be implemented in Ubuntu:
https://github.com/linux-pam/linux-pam/issues/42#issuecomment-367450193

** Affects: pam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1847902

Title:
  pam_nologin should optionally exclude users of the "wheel" group from
  its access restrictions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam/+bug/1847902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1473088] Re: network manager peap mschapv2 authentication stopped working

2015-08-24 Thread Maris Nartiss
According to a RH bug description, the problem lies on the server side
of connection.

Quote:  wpa_supplicant 2.4 may trigger this where 2.3 would not,
becuase 2.4 enables some new ciphers for use with TLSv1.2, and the
server may have enabled DH only for those ciphers that are now enabled.

The options are to either get your network admins to fix the DH key issue by 
using something  768 bits, or to disable TLSv1.2 for now until they fix it.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241930

Too short DH key issue affects many programs (google it - sendmail,
postfix, mysql etc.)

Currently only option seems to be to downgrade wpa_supplicant to 2.3 as
it seems to work and wait till a) a failback mechanism will be
implemented to use older (and insecure!) TLS or SSL if TLS 1.2 fails or
b) all eduroam RADIUS servers will be upgraded (more like never).

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #1241930
   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241930

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1473088

Title:
  network manager peap mschapv2 authentication stopped working

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1473088/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 862220]

2012-06-22 Thread Maris Nartiss
It's 2012 and it's still not possible to launch mail application on
4.8.3 without reading bugzilla entries. Uh, well

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862220

Title:
  kmail fails to start after migration from natty to oneiric

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdepim/+bug/862220/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 313452] Re: Jaunty, Karmic: when booting from one partition and installing to another, installer fails to unmount '/cdrom' this halts installation.

2010-10-30 Thread Maris Nartiss
Just got hit by this issue when trying to reinstall Ubuntu 9.x from Dell
DVD. As I was trying to explain how to do reinstall via phone, it turned
out to complete failure :(

-- 
Jaunty, Karmic: when booting from one partition and installing to another, 
installer fails to unmount '/cdrom' this halts installation.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313452
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 572943] Re: Regression over Karmic on detection of physical screen size and resolution

2010-09-30 Thread Maris Nartiss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 589485 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 589485
   Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI
 * You can subscribe to bug 589485 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscribe

-- 
Regression over Karmic on detection of physical screen size and resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572943
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201032] Re: DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96

2010-09-30 Thread Maris Nartiss
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 589485 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589485

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 589485
   Ignores physical display size and calculates based on 96DPI
 * You can subscribe to bug 589485 by following this link: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/589485/+subscribe

-- 
DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201032
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 80940] Re: ati radeon driver does not autodetect displaysize on Latitude D600, therefore uses wrong resolution

2010-09-30 Thread Maris Nartiss
It seems that original issue is replaced with a new problem - #589485
Xorg ignores screen size and sets DPI to 96. Everyone, who's hit by
96DPI, please, move to #589485 and also add Your mee too to
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705 as there are no plans
to fix this issue because now it's a FEATURE!

** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #23705
   http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705

-- 
ati radeon driver does not autodetect displaysize on Latitude D600, therefore 
uses wrong resolution
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/80940
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 201032] Re: DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96

2010-09-28 Thread Maris Nartiss
It's not a bug - it's a FEATURE! See more:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705

Since xorg 1.7 it lies about Your screens DPI (unless You use NVIDIA
closed drivers). Because Microsoft Windows up to Vista defaulted to
96dpi, now also X servers default to 96dpi no mater what screen size You
have. Lucky for You, You can't override this feature in Your xorg.conf
file.

Only option - get correct screen size settings in mm and add xrandr --fbmm 
WxH to Your .xsessionrc or set DisplaySize at  Section Monitor in Your 
xorg.conf.
Be ware, that xdpyinfo also lies about Your screen size! If You use nouveau 
driver, it reports correct screen size and DPI in xorg.log and then this 
information gets ignored. Check Your screen dimensions with plain' ol' ruler to 
find out correct screen size. 

Don't forget to inform Xorg dev's how You *love* this new feature!

Correct settings for Dell Latitude E6500 with 1440*900 screen are: 
  dimensions:1440x900 pixels (333x212 millimeters)
  resolution:110x108 dots per inch


** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #23705
   http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23705

-- 
DPI not set or incorrectly set to 96
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201032
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236247] Re: HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04

2008-06-03 Thread Maris Nartiss
I made some tests with that usb to serial converter and modem.
First - I connected to my Gentoo laptop (udev-122, 2.6.25-gentoo-r1) and I got 
same error message in dmesg as in Ubuntu 8.04. I added new udev rule, replugged 
device and it started to work in Gentoo. Conclusion - issue is not only Ubuntu 
specific and it's fixable.
For reference - the new udev rule, that worked on my Gentoo box (2.6.15 
kernel): SUBSYSTEM==usb, ATTR{idVendor}==0451,  ATTR{idProduct}==3410,  
RUN+=/bin/sh -c 'echo 2  /sys%p/bConfigurationValue'

As next step I used same udev rule on Ubuntu 8.04 but without any luck - for 
some reason it doesn't work in Ubuntu.  
More info from Ubuntu 8.04 box (lsmod, udevinfo and udevtest in attachment):

dmesg:
[  473.753611] usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 3
[  473.987653] usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
[  473.993599] ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 2-1:1.0 failed with error -5

uname -a:
Linux zakis 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 14:31:33 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux

# This part is strange, as on Gentoo I can freely change that /sys%p value with 
echo 2 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# echo 2  /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/2-1/bConfigurationValue
-su: echo: write error: Invalid argument

# As You can see, previous command was not successfull and also udev rule has 
failed.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /sys/bus/usb/devices/usb2/2-1/bConfigurationValue
1


** Attachment added: udevinfo, udevtest and lsmod output
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14969527/huawei_debug_info

-- 
HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236247
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 236247] [NEW] HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04

2008-05-31 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

I have HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem [1] and it was working just fine on
i386 7.10 after I followed instructions how to create custom udev rule
[2]. After Ubuntu upgrade to 8.04 those instructions doesn't help
anymore and no /dev/ttyUSB* device is created for modem.

Unfortunately this modem is far, far away and as it's only way to
internet from there, thus I can't post various ls*/dmesg stuff, but I
double checked, that idVendor and idProduct numbers reported by lsusb
match those listed in [2] and - more important - they where working in
previous Ubuntu release :(

1. http://www.huawei.com/mobileweb/en/products/view.do?id=320pageId=null
2. http://blog.mohanjith.net/2007/06/installing-huawei-ets1000-on-linux.html

For record (if [2] goes down). 
Udev rule:
#TI USB 3410
SUBSYSTEM==usb_device ACTION==add 
SYSFS{idVendor}==0451,SYSFS{idProduct}==3410 \
SYSFS{bNumConfigurations}==2 \
SYSFS{bConfigurationValue}==1 \
RUN+=/bin/sh -c 'echo 2  /sys%p/device/bConfigurationValue'

dmesg messages after plugging in USB device:
ti_usb_3410_5052 1-1:1.0: TI USB 3410 1 port adapter converter detected
ti_usb_3410_5052: probe of 1-1:1.0 failed with error -5

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
HUAWEI ETS1000 CDMA modem doesn't work anymore in 8.04
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236247
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 182102] logout screen kde no text

2008-01-11 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

KDE logout screen has only four buttons and cancel button. No other
text is present. It's hard to guess which of the buttons/icons what does
without any hints, tooltips etc.

Distro: Kubuntu feisty
KDE version: 3.5.6

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
logout screen kde no text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 182102] Re: logout screen kde no text

2008-01-11 Thread Maris Nartiss

** Attachment added: A screenshot with problem
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/11302328/logout_bug.png

-- 
logout screen kde no text
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182102
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 175666] Re: Firefox is unable to play flash movie

2007-12-12 Thread Maris Nartiss
Same here on fresh 32bit 7.10. 
I installed flashplugin-nonfree via Synaptics, still Firefox complains about 
missing flash plugin and offers to install it. When I try to install via 
Firefox, it says, that I have it already installed, still it shows, that plugin 
is missing.

-- 
Firefox is unable to play flash movie
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/175666
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 132837] Re: [apport] ubiquity crashed with PartmanOptionError in must_find_one_script() when creating first partition Do Not Use

2007-11-15 Thread Maris Nartiss
Same here on AMD64 box. Will have to use some comandline tools to
partition drive :|

-- 
[apport] ubiquity crashed with PartmanOptionError in must_find_one_script() 
when creating first partition Do Not Use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132837
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 70700] qt4-designer package does not create menu entry

2006-11-07 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: qt4-designer

In Kubuntu I have no menu entry for qt4-designer installed with package
qt4-designer-4.2.0-1ubuntu6

** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
qt4-designer package does not create menu entry
https://launchpad.net/bugs/70700

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 42049] Re: no direct rendering on dapper with i810 chipset (855GM)

2006-10-21 Thread Maris Nartiss
Try out intel driver (xserver-xorg-video-intel). I had same problem in
Dapper, moved to Edgy and had to use VESA driver till I found intel
driver. Now I have DRI. Unfortunately it give me only additional 100 FPS
in glxgears (now up to 600), but it's better than nothing :)

Warning - I also experienced hard-lockups. Also You can not switch to
console.

i855GM on Dell Latitude D505

-- 
no direct rendering on dapper with i810 chipset (855GM)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/42049

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-10-21 Thread Maris Nartiss
I switched from i810 driver to intel (xserver-xorg-video-intel
1.6.0-0ubuntu1) driver and got my 1024x768 back with xv, DRI and AIGLX.

Altrough intel driver has some issues: 
DRI is slooow (max 600fps in glxgears, max 500fps w/o DRI = +100fps only); 
I can not switch to console (consoles content is in upper grabbled 2 cm of 
screen);
fn key to switch between LFP and VGA out doesn't work;
TV-out also doesn't work (have not tested with i810);
some hard-lockups on high load.

But still is better than VESA :)

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 63788] Wrong fonts for boot screen in Edgy

2006-10-03 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

Kubuntu edgy beta1 and knot3 both offer national language choice for
boot loader in live version. Unfortunately used font does not contain
all required glyphs for Latvian language. Result - texts have empty
spaces instead of non-latin glyphs. Some glyphs are present and are
shown correctly.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Wrong fonts for boot screen in Edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63788

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 63807] Serial mouse not detected in Edgy

2006-10-03 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

No serial mouse is detected on Kubuntu Edgy beta 1 leaving Xorg without
mouse.

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Serial mouse not detected in Edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63807

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61494] Re: Wrong desktop file entry for subversion

2006-09-25 Thread Maris Nartiss
It has nothing to do with mplayer. This bug was assigned to mplayer by
this beautiful and user frendly bugzilla system.

-- 
Wrong desktop file entry for subversion
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61494

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61494] Wrong desktop file entry for subversion

2006-09-20 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

Error message translated from Latvian:
Desktop file
/usr/share/apps/konqueror/servicemenus/kdesvn_subversion.desktop
contains wrong entry
Exportto.

** Affects: mplayer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Wrong desktop file entry for subversion
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61494

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-09-19 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-i810

In Dapper my i855gm card where working out of box (no DRI, but correct
resolution, xv, output to VGA out port). After upgrade to Edgy, I manage
to get only 640x480 + garbage in upper 2cm of screen. Disabling AIGLX,
DRI, GLX doesn't help (only changes distortion look).


00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated 
Graphics Device (rev 02)
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation 82852/855GM Integrated Graphics 
Device (rev 02)

** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-i810 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-09-19 Thread Maris Nartiss
sudo 915resolution -l
Intel 800/900 Series VBIOS Hack : version 0.5.2

Chipset: 855GM
BIOS: TYPE 1
Mode Table Offset: $C + $29f
Mode Table Entries: 39

Mode 30 : 640x480, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 32 : 800x600, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 34 : 1024x768, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 38 : 1280x1024, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 3a : 1600x1200, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 3c : 1920x1440, 8 bits/pixel
Mode 41 : 640x480, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 43 : 800x600, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 45 : 1024x768, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 49 : 1280x1024, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 4b : 1600x1200, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 4d : 1920x1440, 16 bits/pixel
Mode 50 : 640x480, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 52 : 800x600, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 54 : 1024x768, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 58 : 1280x1024, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 5a : 1600x1200, 32 bits/pixel
Mode 5c : 1920x1440, 32 bits/pixel


** Attachment added: Xorg.log with DRI enabled
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311132/xorg.dri.log

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-09-19 Thread Maris Nartiss
uname -a
Linux GRASS 2.6.17-7-generic #2 SMP Wed Sep 6 17:56:40 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux

** Attachment added: Xorg.conf
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311135/xorg.conf

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-09-19 Thread Maris Nartiss
Sorry, correct resolution is 1024x768 and I get it out of box in Dapper
- without any 915resolution tricks.

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 61234] Re: 640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper

2006-09-19 Thread Maris Nartiss
At attached image is seen screen when DRI is disabled (edgy's X.org with
i810 driver).

** Attachment added: Broken screen on i855gm w i180 driver
   http://librarian.launchpad.net/4311679/i810_xorg_7.1_bug.JPG

-- 
640x480 with i855gm in edgy, OK in dapper
https://launchpad.net/bugs/61234

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 58456] Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code

2006-09-01 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

This bug affects any Qt 4 using app with file open dialog.
It is fixed in Qt 4.1.3

More info: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/task-
tracker/index_html?method=entryid=106783

** Affects: Ubuntu
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58456

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 58456] Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code

2006-09-01 Thread Maris Nartiss
Public bug reported:

This bug affects any Qt 4 using app with file open dialog.
It is fixed in Qt 4.1.3

More info: http://www.trolltech.com/developer/task-
tracker/index_html?method=entryid=106783

** Affects: qt4-x11 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Untriaged
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Qt 4.1.1 and 4.1.2 contain bug in file open dialog code
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58456

-- 
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs