[Bug 1629543] Re: KDE does not start when using lightdm

2021-02-11 Thread Michael Pardee
I ran into the same problem in 20.04 after switching to lightdm and it
took me a while to figure out.

Just as Simon pointed out:
/usr/share/lightdm/lightdm.conf.d/40-kde-plasma-kf5.conf
should have:
user-session=plasma
instead of
user-session=kde-plasma-kf5
since there is no kde-plasma-kf5.desktop in /usr/share/xsessions

I understand that most people aren't switching the display manager but
this is such an easy fix I'd hope that it's done to save a lot of
frustration for the few that do.


** Changed in: plasma-workspace (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629543

Title:
  KDE does not start when using lightdm

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-workspace/+bug/1629543/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901606] Re: security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2 import Http" fails now

2020-11-03 Thread Michael Pardee
xenial fix verified, thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901606

Title:
  security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2
  import Http" fails now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-python/+bug/1901606/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901606] Re: security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2 import Http" fails now

2020-10-26 Thread Michael Pardee
note this also happens with the version of httplib2 installed from 
apt-get install python-httplib2
from the repositories, not just the version from pip I was using.

pip2 install httplib2 installs the module into: /usr/local/lib/python2.7
/dist-packages

and the python-httplib2 package installs it into: /usr/lib/python2.7
/dist-packages/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901606

Title:
  security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2
  import Http" fails now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-python/+bug/1901606/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1901606] [NEW] security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2 import Http" fails now

2020-10-26 Thread Michael Pardee
Public bug reported:

I glanced at the libpam-python 1.0.4-1.1+deb8u1build0.16.04.1 diff  but
it wasn't immediately obvious - why does this security update break
importing httplib2 ?  Other more standard imports like sys, os,
datetime, don't seem to be a problem.  Does this update change or
restrict the python module paths?

Here's the error that shows up in /var/log/auth.log
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/lib/security/pam_pacauth.py", line 18, in 
 from httplib2 import Http
 ImportError: No module named httplib2

Here's line 18 from my pam module:
from httplib2 import Http

To reproduce this  ( on 16.04 ) just install httplib2 using:
pip2 install httplib2
and then try to use a python pam module with this line in it:
from httplib2 import Http

With the older 1.0.4-1 version this has worked just fine for the past 4
years.

** Affects: pam-python (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901606

Title:
  security update broke module import in libpam-python, "from httplib2
  import Http" fails now

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pam-python/+bug/1901606/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1783371] Re: ubuntu versions of libreoffice writer render and print some documents improperly, they show up with fewer/missing pages

2018-07-24 Thread Michael Pardee
output of ubuntu-bug attached, but as far as I can tell there is nothing
system-specific about this bug, stock Ubuntu 18.04 is affected.

** Attachment added: "sudo ubuntu-bug --save lowriter.bug libreoffice-writer"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1783371/+attachment/5167228/+files/lowriter.bug

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783371

Title:
  ubuntu versions of libreoffice writer render and print some documents
  improperly, they show up with fewer/missing pages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1783371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1783371] [NEW] ubuntu versions of libreoffice writer render and print some documents improperly, they show up with fewer/missing pages

2018-07-24 Thread Michael Pardee
Public bug reported:

Libreoffice writer as packaged by Ubuntu is rendering and printing some
documents incorrectly - differently than the debs from libreoffice and
the versions for most other OSes.  It is possibly triggered by lots of
overlapping images that were pasted into the document.

When you open the attached document it should show up as 7 pages.
However with 6.0.3.2 ( 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1 )  in the standard Ubuntu 18.04
repositories it briefly shows 1/7 pages in the lower left as the
document loads and then switches to 1/5 pages, and only 5 pages show up
and print.

The same thing happens with 6.0.5.2 from the libreoffice fresh ppa and
6.0.6 from the prereleases ppa.

This has been repeated using a clean 18.04 install, dist-upgraded.
Between versions I remove --purge libreoffice* and delete.
.config/libreoffice/.

I filed this bug at libreoffice: 
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118597
but then found out that the problem does not occur using a different OS like 
windows or redhat or debian or manjaro.  ( linux mint shows the same behavior 
as Ubuntu).  If you open that document with the .deb files downloaded directly 
from the libreoffice site and installed into /opt then the document renders as 
7 pages.  So it sure seems like this is an Ubuntu-specific bug.  As mentioned 
in the libreoffice bug it is not as simple as a VCL gtk3 vs. gtk2 difference, I 
don't know what else is different between the ubuntu repository and ppa 
packages and the debs from libreoffice.

The problem was initially discovered under Ubuntu 16.04 using 6.0.5.2
from the fresh ppa , some documents were showing as 7 pages but only 5
pages were printing, but only with certain printer ppds.  The fact that
the document displays as 7 vs. 5 pages is much easier to see and
replicate and is hopefully related to the original printing missing
pages problem.

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "document that should be 7 pages but only renders as 5 on 
Ubuntu 18.04"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783371/+attachment/5167227/+files/flowers-7-pages.odt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1783371

Title:
  ubuntu versions of libreoffice writer render and print some documents
  improperly, they show up with fewer/missing pages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1783371/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1767784] Re: [regression] output device not recognized anymore since update 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9

2018-05-02 Thread Michael Pardee
1:8.0-0ubuntu3.10 from proposed fixes the problem

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767784

Title:
  [regression] output device not recognized anymore since update
  1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1767784/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768411] Re: pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware, the dummy output profile is selected by default

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Pardee
I see now there is an option for additional attachments (one per
comment) so I'm going to attache the files separately, here is the
output of pacmd list sinks

** Attachment added: "pacmd-list.log"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+attachment/5131793/+files/pacmd-list.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768411

Title:
  pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware,  the
  dummy output profile is selected by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768411] Re: pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware, the dummy output profile is selected by default

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Pardee
here is the default.pa

** Attachment added: "default.pa"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+attachment/5131794/+files/default.pa

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768411

Title:
  pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware,  the
  dummy output profile is selected by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768411] Re: pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware, the dummy output profile is selected by default

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Pardee
here is the text from running:
apport-cli -f -p pulseaudio --save bug.apport


** Attachment added: "bug.apport"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+attachment/5131795/+files/bug.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768411

Title:
  pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware,  the
  dummy output profile is selected by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768411] [NEW] pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware, the dummy output profile is selected by default

2018-05-01 Thread Michael Pardee
Public bug reported:

I help manage a few hundred computers and since the last pulseaudio
update a few weeks ago ( xenial-updates )  from
pulseaudio_1%3a8.0-0ubuntu3.8_amd64.deb to
pulseaudio_1%3a8.0-0ubuntu3.9_amd64.deb ( and libpulse0 )  certain
hardware including dell models 755, 390, and 3050 lost sound.  They were
working fine for years but now the dummy output profile is selected by
default. What happened?


This can be worked around by explicitly setting:
set-card-profile 0 output:analog-stereo
set-sink-port 1  analog-output-headphones


or by reverting back to pulseaudio_1%3a8.0-0ubuntu3.8_amd64.deb ( along with 
libpulse0 ) .


When I try to use apport it gets to the end and says "apport cannot connect to 
crash database" but I have included example system details in the attachment 
after the output of pacmd list sinks and default.pa.   ( You can only attach 
one file ?!?)

** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: "pacmd list sinks and default.pa and  apport bug text 
contents"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768411/+attachment/5131792/+files/pacmd-list-and-default-pa-and-apport-bug.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768411

Title:
  pulseaudio 8.0-0ubuntu3.9 update broke sound on certain hardware,  the
  dummy output profile is selected by default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/1768411/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1742912] Re: Please confine guest sessions again

2018-03-01 Thread Michael Pardee
I figured out why the simple test didn't work - when I first installed
Ubuntu 18.04, gnome-terminal wouldn't accept any keyboard input, I
assumed it was just a pre-alpha bug and installed terminator.
Installing terminator switched itself to the default including launching
with ctrl-alt-t , and terminator does get apparmor restricted.When I
paste in "cat /proc/self/attr/current" into a gnome-terminal it shows
unconfined.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742912

Title:
  Please confine guest sessions again

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1742912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1742912] Re: Please confine guest sessions again

2018-03-01 Thread Michael Pardee
Please note that the simple test ( cat /proc/self/attr/current ) can be
misleading.

I tried that in Ubuntu 18.04 ( switched to lightdm ) and got "(enforce)"
but some applications like the file manager could browse other user's
home directories.  Most applications including firefox and libreoffice
are restricted.  In Xubuntu the file manager is restricted as well as
every other application I tried.


Is it possible to just eliminate certain applications or prevent launching 
applications in specific ways to guarantee a restricted guest sessions?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1742912

Title:
  Please confine guest sessions again

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1742912/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-11-21 Thread Michael Pardee
The problem no longer seems to be occurring anymore even with the
4.10.0-33-generic kernel.  Since 2017-09-11 all of the affected machines
have been getting automatic package updates and I'm guessing some non-
kernel package has changed something that prevents the problem.

I would like to know what fixed it and I could start reverting those
package updates or start over with an old install, but for now as long
as it is fixed it might not be worth investigating further.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-11-15 Thread Michael Pardee
There were no shutdown issues with 4.13.0-16-generic in 20 shutdowns -
very promising.  I am switching back to 4.10.0-33 now to make sure the
problem still occurs and nothing else has changed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-11-07 Thread Michael Pardee
OK, I'm trying out 4.13.0-16-generic ( and extra ) from artful now on an
8 hour shutdown cycle, it may take a few days to know if the problem
will occur.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-09-11 Thread Michael Pardee
The problem still occurs without a separate /tmp partition.  Still
experiencing the failure on Ubuntu linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic while
4.10.0-041000-generic is problem free.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-09-08 Thread Michael Pardee
I switched back to the Ubuntu linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic kernel and
about 6 reboots later it happened again, so its definitely specific to
the Ubuntu kernel.  I was able to catch it right as it happened, the
last thing before the NMI watchgdog messages occur is:

[  OK  ] Reached target Shutdown.

The only errors visible on the screen are [FAILED] unmounting /tmp and
/var , I always get the failure unmounting /var but not /tmp, maybe that
is significant?  I had /tmp on a separate partition, I removed its fstab
entry so it will be on the / root partition, we'll see if that changes
anything.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] Re: soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-09-07 Thread Michael Pardee
I've been running the 4.10.0-041000-generic upstream kernel for a week
with 3 reboots a day and not a single problem - so the issue is probably
in the Ubuntu kernel.  What is the next step I should take to solve
this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1713751] [NEW] soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

2017-08-29 Thread Michael Pardee
Public bug reported:

Instead of normal complete shutdowns we're getting soft lockup failures.
This started when 16.04 hwe packages switched to the 4.10 kernel about a
month ago. I help manage a few hundred machines spanning several
different sites and several different hardware models and they're all
experiencing this intermittently, approximately 5% get stuck on shutdown
each day.

Here is an example of what is on the screen after it happens, the
machine is unresponsive and requires a hard reset.  I can't see anything
in syslog or dmesg that differs when this happens, I think all logging
has stopped at this point in the shutdown.

[54566.220003] ? (t=6450529 jiffies g=141935 c=141934 q=1288)
[54592.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54620.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54648.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54676.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54704.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54732.092003] NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! (systemd:1)
[54746.232003] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
[54746.232003] ?1-...: (6495431 ticks this GP) idle=5c7/141/0 
softirq=218389/218389 fqs=3247712

This repeats every ~ 22 seconds, sometimes it is stuck for 23s instead of 22: 
... NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 23s! 


Reverting to 4.8.0-58 avoids the problem. I believe the problem has been 
present with every hwe 4.10 kernel package through the current 
linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic.  This bug was filed with data right after it 
occurred with linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic.

This only happens approximately 5% of the time with no discernible
pattern.  I am able to reproduce the issue on one particular machine by
scheduling shutdowns 3 times per day and waiting up to a few days for
the problem to occur. Shutting down and starting up more frequently,
like every 5 minutes or even an hour, will not trigger the problem, it
seems like the machine needs to be running for a while.  It does not
seem to depend on any user actions, it happens even if you never login.
It has happened on reboots as as opposed to shutdowns as well.   I found
a few similar bug reports but nothing for these exact symptoms.

I have tried blacklisting mei_me with no change in behavior.  I'm not
sure but the majority of the affected machines are using intel video
chips.  Next I am going to try a mainline 4.10 kernel.


lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS
Release:16.04


apt-cache policy linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic
linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic:
  Installed: 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1
  Candidate: 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.10.0-33-generic 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-33.37~16.04.1-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-33-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.10
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Tue Aug 29 08:57:26 2017
SourcePackage: linux-hwe
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: linux-hwe (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug third-party-packages xenial

** Attachment added: "soft-lockup-3.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751/+attachment/4940859/+files/soft-lockup-3.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1713751

Title:
  soft lockup / stall on CPU when shutting down with hwe 4.10 kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-hwe/+bug/1713751/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1598300] Re: CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

2017-02-13 Thread Michael Pardee
Johannes Martin (johannes-martin) wrote: Is CUPS some deprecated
setting?

Yes - "BrowseLocalProtocols CUPS" was valid in 12.04 ( what I upgraded
from ) but not anymore.  If you needed to add a BrowseLocalProtocols
line as opposed to switching its value, it seems that this auto-shutdown
feature is triggering off that option being present and assigned certain
values.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598300

Title:
  CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1598300/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1598300] Re: CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

2017-02-10 Thread Michael Pardee
(iiro) "Did you look the cups log to make sure that it really is the
same problem?"

Without any fixes I get these messages about 2 minutes after restarting
cups and cupsd is no longer running:

I [09/Feb/2017:04:08:47 -0600] Printer sharing is off and there are no jobs 
pending, will restart on demand.
I [09/Feb/2017:04:08:47 -0600] Scheduler shutting down normally.

After installing the proposed updates or switching to
BrowseLocalProtocols dnssd those messages go away and cupsd stays
running and client print jobs don't fail with "Connection error:
Transport endpoint is not connected."


(iiro) "but it's now too late to do anything"
Assuming there is absolutely no way to fix bug 1642966, why not switch "-l" to 
"-f" in /lib/systemd/system/cups.service as an official fix?  Is that the only 
way to completely disable this buggy feature?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598300

Title:
  CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1598300/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1598300] Re: CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

2017-02-09 Thread Michael Pardee
This is a very serious bug that breaks network printing in certain
configurations. To be clear: its not just that cups stops and the web
interface is unavailable -  it can lead to not being able to print as
the print server looks like it is offline to the clients:

D [09/Feb/2017:10:07:02 -0600] [Job 12] Connection error: Transport endpoint is 
not connected
E [09/Feb/2017:10:07:02 -0600] [Job 12] The printer is not responding.


I was running into this issue on some print servers but not others and in 
comparing the two cupsd.conf files I found out I can prevent the issue by 
changing
BrowseLocalProtocols CUPS
to 
BrowseLocalProtocols dnssd


The real problem here is that a feature like this should have a clear and easy 
way to turn if off completely.  I don't ever want cups on a print server 
stopping to save an insignificant amount of cpu cycles or memory or 
electricity!  


Applying the packages from xenial-proposed does fix it for me, but in my 
opinion this is a pretty serious issue that needs a quicker fix.

I think the best fix at the moment is the suggestion from Andreas Krausz
(kukorica)  to change " the option "-l" to "-f" in
/lib/systemd/system/cups.service."  as it seems that is the only way to
turn off this "feature".

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1598300

Title:
  CUPS web interface stops responding after a while

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1598300/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1427800] Re: Edit and Disconnect options greyed out after update

2015-03-04 Thread Michael Pardee
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1424119 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424119

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1424119
   Edit Connections...now insensitive by default in network manager's menu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1427800

Title:
  Edit and Disconnect options greyed out after update

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1427800/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1424119] Re: Edit Connections...now insensitive by default in network manager's menu

2015-03-04 Thread Michael Pardee
I have the same problem, my initial search found this bug report:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1427800

The easiest temporary fix is to install the old network-manager-gnome 
9.4.1-0ubuntu2.3 deb, luckily I don't have my mirrors auto clean.  Here is a 
copy, I just had the i386 version:
http://open-sense.com/temp/network-manager-gnome_0.9.4.1-0ubuntu2.3_i386.deb

I wish they would keep at least one older version kept in the repository pools, 
but I googled the exact file name and found these for i386 and amd64. I haven't 
tried them but they should work:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/0.9.4.1-0ubuntu2.3/+build/4503560/+files/network-manager-gnome_0.9.4.1-0ubuntu2.3_i386.deb
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/137742895/network-manager-gnome_0.9.4.1-0ubuntu2.3_amd64.deb

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1424119

Title:
  Edit Connections...now insensitive by default in network manager's
  menu

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-applet/+bug/1424119/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1190344] Re: lightdm is leaking FDs -fix

2015-02-05 Thread Michael Pardee
I just want to confirm this bug affects precise and precise-updates
which is using lightdm 1.2.3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1190344

Title:
  lightdm is leaking FDs -fix

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/lightdm/+bug/1190344/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-07-07 Thread Michael Pardee
Installed the mainline kernel linux-
image-2.6.31-02063113-generic_2.6.31-02063113_i386.deb and problem does
not occur.

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-06-01 Thread Michael Pardee
David, as this only happens on some hardware it is unlikely to be
testable except by those already experiencing the problem on their
machines.  I will gladly test but I need answers to the simple questions
I posed a month ago in this bug report.

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-05-11 Thread Michael Pardee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = New

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-05-11 Thread Michael Pardee
I would like to help solve this but the cut-n-paste response leading to
incomplete instructions didn't help, and I don't want this to just sit
here until the bug auto expires.  Can someone tell me which upstream
kernel version I should be testing with to allow additional upstream
developers to examine the issue ?

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-05-05 Thread Michael Pardee
By latest upstream kernel do you mean 
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.31.13-karmic/
or the 2.6.34-rc version in
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/current/
?

Why is there no 2.6.31.13-karmic image package built in that ppa?  I
looked at the source and the suspect clockevents.c in 2.6.31.13 is the
same as 2.6.31.12 which ubuntu 2.6.31-21 is based on.

If you want me to test with 2.6.31.13 I can build that kernel from
source and test just to make sure the problem is still there, but I want
to make sure that is the latest version you want tested before I go
through that procedure.

If you want me to try a 2.6.34-rc version, can you tell me why there are 
different entries in the ppa for karmic vs. lucid?  Will the lucid ones not 
work on karmic?  Sorry if that is a stupid question, I don't mess with kernels 
much anymore.
The karmic 2.6.34-rc ppa entires like:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v2.6.34-rc3-karmic/
don't have an image built either.

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] [NEW] segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-05-03 Thread Michael Pardee
Public bug reported:

After upgrading to linux-image-2.6.31-21-generic last week (karmic-
updates repository enabled), all of our Gateway E4300 machines end with
a segmentation fault instead of shutting down properly and completely.
Several other models of hardware are unaffected.  This is consistently
observed across several hundred machines.

The 2.6.31-21.59 changelog includes this:
  * clockevents: Prevent clockevent_devices list corruption on cpu hotplug
- LP: #509730

Reverting to linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic prevents the problem, as does
booting with nolapic (but you lose SMP, or hyperthreading in the case of
the E4300).  Also, rebooting does not exhibit the problem, only halt.

This appears to be the same or a nearly identical bug reported in the last few 
months in other distros:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=312767
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-bugs/2010-02/msg01527.html
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15005
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558231

But this is a new regression for Ubuntu.

On the screen the message begins (hand transcribed by someone else):

* Stopping early crypto disks...
  ...done.
* Will now halt
-[ cut here]--
...kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/kernell/time/clockevents.c:262
...invalid opcode:  [#1] SMP

and ends with:

...  EIP: [c0168c1d] clockevents_notify+0xfd/0x110 SS:ESP ...
...  [ end trace 66b1feeaae5006c8 ]---
Segmentation Fault

ProblemType: Bug
AplayDevices:
  List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices 
 card 0: Intel [HDA Intel], device 0: ALC880 Analog [ALC880 Analog]
   Subdevices: 1/1
   Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  gvuser16332 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0x502c irq 16'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC880'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0880,0860,0009'
   Controls  : 20
   Simple ctrls  : 12
Date: Mon May  3 22:29:13 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=9e4b0515-e360-4a27-9cb5-bedaae20c5c2
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
MachineType: Gateway E4300
Package: linux-image-2.6.31-21-generic 2.6.31-21.59
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.31-21-generic 
root=UUID=d9a85527-f97d-45e4-8d48-290d7bbbfe09 ro noquiet nosplash
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-21.59-generic
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.31-21-generic N/A
 linux-firmware 1.26
RfKill:
 
SourcePackage: linux
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-21-generic i686
dmi.bios.date: 10/31/2005
dmi.bios.vendor: Intel Corp.
dmi.bios.version: SE91510J.15A.2609.2005.1031.1237
dmi.board.asset.tag: Base Board Asset Tag
dmi.board.name: D915GUX
dmi.board.vendor: Intel Corporation
dmi.board.version: AAC85199-203
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: NONE
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Gateway
dmi.chassis.version: WTN01A01
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnIntelCorp.:bvrSE91510J.15A.2609.2005.1031.1237:bd10/31/2005:svnGateway:pnE4300:pvr4000983:rvnIntelCorporation:rnD915GUX:rvrAAC85199-203:cvnGateway:ct3:cvrWTN01A01:
dmi.product.name: E4300
dmi.product.version: 4000983
dmi.sys.vendor: Gateway

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 574899] Re: segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c

2010-05-03 Thread Michael Pardee

** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731678/AlsaDevices.txt

** Attachment added: ArecordDevices.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731679/ArecordDevices.txt

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731680/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Card0.Amixer.values.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731681/Card0.Amixer.values.txt

** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.2.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731682/Card0.Codecs.codec.2.txt

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731683/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731684/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731685/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731686/Lsusb.txt

** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731687/PciMultimedia.txt

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731688/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731689/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731690/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731691/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731692/UdevLog.txt

** Attachment added: WifiSyslog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47731693/WifiSyslog.txt

-- 
segmentation fault on shutdown caused by new 2.6.31-21 clockevents.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574899
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 44166] Re: No NTP-Sync during bootup if /usr on different filesystem

2010-02-03 Thread Michael Pardee
This is still broken in Ubuntu 9.10.  I don't know what the root cause
was going back to 6.06 but here is what is going on in 9.10.  I can't
believe the importance is low, this probably affects every single server
installation.  I am tempted to file a new bug as this one is so old and
it looks like Ubuntu just doesn't care.

ntpdate is supposed to be automatically run after a network connection is 
available, started by the script:
/etc/network/if-up.d/ntpdate

If /usr/ is on a separate partition from /, as most servers would do,
the network can be up before non-root partitions are mounted.

To deal with that, there is this section:
# This is for the case that /usr will be mounted later.
if [ -r /lib/udev/hotplug.functions ]; then
. /lib/udev/hotplug.functions
wait_for_file /usr/sbin/ntpdate-debian
fi

however /lib/udev/hotplug.functions does not exist, so it doesn't wait
for /usr/ to be mounted, and the time never gets synced because
/usr/sbin/ntpdate-debian is on the /usr/ partition which is not mounted
yet.

hotplug.functions does not exist in any Ubuntu package as far as I can
tell, but it is in the udev package of Debian Lenny.

I found some other bugs referencing /lib/udev/hotplug.functions so there
is probably a bigger problem than just broken ntpdate functionality.

In trying to make the boot process a few seconds faster and win over new
linux users, Ubuntu has broken all sorts of functionality that the core
linux audience depends on.

-- 
No NTP-Sync during bootup if /usr on different filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44166
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 44166] Re: No NTP-Sync during bootup if /usr on different filesystem

2010-02-03 Thread Michael Pardee
the problem is either in the ntpdate or udev package, how do we get this
bug moved to the correct package?

-- 
No NTP-Sync during bootup if /usr on different filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/44166
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 496640] Re: iwlagn WLAN no longer works after upgrade to 2.6.31-17

2010-01-01 Thread Michael Pardee
same problem, with a 5100 card.


working under 2.6.31-16:
zcat /var/log/dmesg.2.gz  | grep iwlag | cut -c 16-999
iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, 1.3.27k
iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2009 Intel Corporation
iwlagn :20:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16
iwlagn :20:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
iwlagn :20:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 5100AGN REV=0x54
iwlagn :20:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels
iwlagn :20:00.0: irq 33 for MSI/MSI-X
iwlagn :20:00.0: firmware: requesting iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
iwlagn :20:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12


not working under 2.6.31-17: (iwlist scanning works intermittently, but can't 
acquire dhcp address)
zcat /var/log/dmesg.1.gz  | grep iwlag | cut -c 16-999
iwlagn: Intel(R) Wireless WiFi Link AGN driver for Linux, 1.3.27ks
iwlagn: Copyright(c) 2003-2009 Intel Corporation
iwlagn :20:00.0: PCI INT A - GSI 16 (level, low) - IRQ 16
iwlagn :20:00.0: setting latency timer to 64
iwlagn :20:00.0: Detected Intel Wireless WiFi Link 5100AGN REV=0x54
iwlagn :20:00.0: Tunable channels: 13 802.11bg, 24 802.11a channels
iwlagn :20:00.0: irq 33 for MSI/MSI-X
iwlagn :20:00.0: firmware: requesting lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode
iwlagn :20:00.0: lbm-iwlwifi-5000-2.ucode firmware file req failed: -2
iwlagn :20:00.0: firmware: requesting lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode
iwlagn :20:00.0: Loaded firmware lbm-iwlwifi-5000-1.ucode, which is 
deprecated. Please use API v2 instead.
iwlagn :20:00.0: loaded firmware version 8.24.2.12

-- 
iwlagn WLAN no longer works after upgrade to 2.6.31-17
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496640
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 445256] Re: Wrong path to X server in gdm.conf

2009-11-01 Thread Michael Pardee
sed -i 's/X11R6\///' /etc/gdm/gdm.conf

-- 
Wrong path to X server in gdm.conf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/445256
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 459998] Re: davfs kernoops can't mount partition as user

2009-10-31 Thread Michael Pardee
yes, this is a problem.  until there is a legitimate fix I'm going to do
without the oops tracker:

apt-get remove kerneloops-daemon
perl -ni -e 'print unless /kernoops/' /etc/passwd

I could maybe see this being a bug of kerneloops-daemon since / is not
really a home directory in the traditional sense, but on the other hand
davfs2 policy is not ideal since there are many unusual but technically
possible assignments of home directories. I would rather see davfs2
restrict mounting in a better way, maybe only on directories that the
user has write permission on regardless of where it is in the
filesystem.

-- 
davfs kernoops can't mount partition as user
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459998
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 441100] Re: within chroot, can fail to reload daemon configuration if not running (detects dbus daemon outside of chroot)

2009-10-28 Thread Michael Pardee
The title of this bug is a little confusing, I am trying to deal with
this bug and I almost filed a separate bug with this description:

Upgrades of the dbus package fail unless dbus is running

This is a problem for a number of reasons:

1. if you are running in a chroot, dbus upgrades fail.  I imagine this is a 
problem in other similar installation or maintenance scenarios, including the 
uck package (Ubuntu Customization Kit)
2. if somehow dbus got broken and couldn't start, you could never reinstall or 
upgrade it to fix the problem

This can sometimes be worked around by binding /var/run/dbus on the host
system, but what is the upgrade doing over the bus that should really be
happening to the chroot system?  If it is nothing important the package
should not die on the error, and if it is important then the package
should be updated to store the necessary bus commands and run them the
next time the bus is active.  This was a somewhat smaller problem in
Jaunty and earlier Ubuntu releases that could easily be worked around by
explicitly starting dbus in the chroot, but now with recent init script
updates it detects the dbus process from the host system and won't
start in the chroot.  This issue needs to be formally addressed.

error log:
Setting up dbus (1.2.16-0ubuntu9) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/dbus-1/system.conf ...
The system user `messagebus' already exists. Exiting.
Failed to open connection to system message bus: Failed to connect to socket 
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: No such file or directory
dpkg: error processing dbus (--configure):

-- 
within chroot, can fail to reload daemon configuration if not running (detects 
dbus daemon outside of chroot)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441100
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 195666] Re: Allow pressing escape to see boot messages

2009-10-28 Thread Michael Pardee
So after this fix, how do you make truly verbose startup messages occur
without hitting ESC?  Maybe this is a different bug, but removing the
quiet and splash parameters in karmic doesn't make things as verbose as
it should (and used to).

Hitting ESC as recently as the 9.10 RC live CD showed verbose information (all 
stdout/stderr output by init scripts), but now after this fix hitting ESC kills 
startup processes potentially causing big problems, for example trying to hit 
ESC I've gotten messages like:
mountall: Cancelled
General error mounting filesystems

Even with the quiet and splash boot parameters removed in karmic, (and
even with usplash uninstalled) you only get the basic messages output by
commands like log_begin_message and not anything sent to stdout or
stderr like you would in jaunty and all previous releases.  If they're
just going to a different virtual terminal I couldn't find them there
either.

So how can I see ALL messages from the init scripts now that the ESC key
functionality has essentially been taken away?

-- 
Allow pressing escape to see boot messages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195666
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs