[Bug 1283218] Re: fail to start

2014-10-21 Thread MiiJaySung
This affects me. I happen to notice this do symlink to the ehcache that
red5-server depends on so not sure why it's not picking it up

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1283218

Title:
  fail to start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/red5/+bug/1283218/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1123483] Re: package red5-server 1.0~svn4279-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2014-10-21 Thread MiiJaySung
This is related to #1283218 on Utopic and probably Trusty too

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1123483

Title:
  package red5-server 1.0~svn4279-1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/red5/+bug/1123483/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 856481] Re: gnome-shell is not installable after last upgrade

2011-09-23 Thread MiiJaySung
Yes, this happened to me as well, I installed from a beta1 DVD and told
it to automatically download updates. Given gnome-shell isn't there by
default, it seems I'm forced to Unity for a few days (i.e. I didn't have
the option about partial upgrade that you normally get form update-
manager -d).

Anyway, would be good to know when this resolves :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/856481

Title:
  gnome-shell is not installable after last upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/856481/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 806548] Re: [xorg-edgers] Desktop gets messed

2011-07-06 Thread MiiJaySung
Yes, the issue with this is:

xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.0+git20110706.0be47f45

If you are using an Intel graphics chipset (I have a Thinkpad with a
similar setup and had similar issues).

The best way to work round this for now is to download and install:

https://launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/ppa/+build/2589725/+files
/xserver-xorg-video-
intel_2.15.0%2Bgit20110624.471115a9-0ubuntu0sarvatt_amd64.deb

(From page https://launchpad.net/~xorg-
edgers/+archive/ppa/+build/2589725)

This should get round things for the short term.

I also noticed when I installed any later versions of this package that
were built between now and 471115a9 that my X display would randomly go
black and refuse to switch modes (i.e. switching to a TTY by pressing
Ctrl + Alt + F2, etc wouldn't switch the display, but otherwise did
allow me to switch to TTY to gracefully reboot by three finger salute).
Likewise SAK (Sys Req + Alt Gr + K wouldn't reset X)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806548

Title:
  [xorg-edgers] Desktop gets messed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/806548/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 529011] [NEW] Ruby 1.9.1 leaks memory in Lucid on AMD64

2010-02-27 Thread MiiJaySung
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ruby1.9.1

I reported this, originally at #514322

I've put in another report as this affects Lucid as well as Karmic. This
bug only seems to affect AMD64 platforms.

The latest SVN trunk of Ruby 1.9 has been fixed for the last few weeks
since it was marked as fixed at http://redmine.ruby-
lang.org/issues/show/1392

A simple test case for this is under AMD64:

./ruby -e 'loop { Class.new.__send__ :include, Module.new }'
./ruby -e 'loop { Module.new.extend Module.new }'

Running the above will leak memory. This is easy to see through any
process listing application, such as top, or GNOME task manager. This
will happen until the system runs out of memory, or the offending Ruby
process is killed.

Given that most people using Ruby 1.9.x will be Rails developers using
Rails in development (debug) mode who wish to migrate their code base
from 1.8.x so it's compatible with 1.9.x, I would guess that it is in
the interest in the Ruby  Rails community to utilize the latest 1.9.x
branch were possible. Also, given that in the Ruby community that Ruby
1.9 is known to be a moving target, developers will want to test against
the latest version (compared to 1.8.x which is supposed to fairly static
and thus considered stable).

Will it be asking too much to do this, (as I'm guessing the packages are
pulled upstream from Debian, I'm guessing this will need to be passed on
to Debian maintainers?)

** Affects: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Ruby 1.9.1 leaks memory in Lucid on AMD64
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529011
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 514322] [NEW] Ruby 1.9.1 leaks memory when using Module.include

2010-01-29 Thread MiiJaySung
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ruby1.9.1

I've discovered, along with a handful of others that Ruby 1.9.1 leaks
memory when using Module.include

This is major issue for those using Ruby in an persistent environment
(i.e. Rails processes which are typically daemonised) as the host
machine will probably run out of memory.

A simple test-case is: ruby -e 'loop { Module.new.extend Module.new }'

I've nudged the Ruby developers upstream about this over here:

http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/1392

There is now a patch (pending as I speak) which is going to be committed
to the 1.9.2 trunk.

Given that it looks like lucid is still working from 1.9.1, and there
will be Karmic users utilizing Ruby 1.9.1 it would be highly desirable
if this can be back-ported to Lucid and Karmic.

** Affects: ruby1.9.1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: extend include leak memory ruby1.9

** Tags added: extend include leak memory ruby1.9

-- 
Ruby 1.9.1 leaks memory when using Module.include
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514322
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 479489] Re: disable Super+MiddleClick by default

2009-12-06 Thread MiiJaySung
Agreed, this totally annoys the hell out of me. I do this by accident
regularly on my laptop when intending to do Alt + Middle mouse and drag
to resize, because the the keyboard layout / spacing is physically a
little different from a typical keyboard.

-- 
disable Super+MiddleClick by default
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479489
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 450048] Re: xorg memory use

2009-11-03 Thread MiiJaySung
Why has this been marked as invalid. I have found the ATI driver seems
to either be leaking, or eating far too much RAM on my 4Gb system (to
the point where it swaps a lot under load). Installing the ATI driver
via envyng-core resolved my memory issues. Clearly the default binary
blob shipped seems to have some issues still.

-- 
xorg memory use
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/450048
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 428619] Re: pulseaudio crackle/distortion with cs46xx on latest update

2009-11-03 Thread MiiJaySung
I can confirm that I also have this. My active sound card is the onboard
sound on my Asus M2N32 WS Pro motherboard. It's using a AD1988B (Analog
Devices) chip, and it's driving spare!

-- 
pulseaudio crackle/distortion with cs46xx on latest update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] Re: Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-06-13 Thread MiiJaySung
FYI, it appears Bug #364497 is a copy of this too.

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] Re: Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-06-13 Thread MiiJaySung
Any news on this? I know it's not something totally in your control
because down to ATI/AMD to sort out their blob's. Would be nice to be
able to use Jaunty

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] Re: Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-04-26 Thread MiiJaySung

** Attachment added: lspci -vvnn
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26000842/pci.txt

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] Re: Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-04-26 Thread MiiJaySung

** Attachment added: X Org log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26000848/Xorg.0.log

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] Re: Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-04-26 Thread MiiJaySung

** Attachment added: Old X Org log
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26000854/Xorg.0.log.old

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 363412] [NEW] Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver

2009-04-18 Thread MiiJaySung
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xorg-driver-fglrx

I'm using an ATI HD 2600 pro and find that enabling Xinerama causes X to
produce a garbled display (basically looks like the the memory from boot
screen at top but garbled / wrong colours, so I assume it's set the
screen resolution but hasn't cleared the frame buffer). It appears the
screen resolution is set on both screens, but X seems to hang shortly
after. I notice the hard-disk goes for a second or so, but then then my
machine completely freezes. Obviously I'm expecting both screens to work
as a large desktop and the system not to crash in the process (excuse
the sarcasm, it did ask me in the guidelines to state what i expect to
happen =p)

Ctrl Alt Backspace / AltGr SysReq / 3 finger salute doesn't seem to be
acknowledged, so I get the impression this is a kernel freeze.

This is damn annoying for me (as I really need 2 screens). I understand
it's not totally something that is under the control of Ubuntu
Developers directly, but I assume you communicate with ATI and have
prodding authority when it comes to making them patch up their stinking
code blob. Both my screens are the same (DVI digital) at 1600x1200.

I've using a fresh install of the release candidate (as I released it's
only since the beta fglrx got updated for xserver 1.6), with all updates
installed.

I can get independent dual screens to work (i.e. work as independent X
displays, however compiz doesn't fully work here) and for both displays
to mirror a screen with full acceleration (compiz is fine here).

Intrepid and Gutsy seemed fine under this setup, so I really would like
this to work in jaunty as well if you can squeeze this in between now
and the final release.

I'm not too sure what else you want from me, would a lspci -vvv be of
any help?

This is similar to bug #40544, however I've opened a new report as this
affects Jaunty, not Dapper, and so I assume the causes / reasons for the
bug are very different.

Thanks for your time.
Jase.

** Affects: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Xinerama does not work on jaunty RC with fglrx driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363412
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 287811] Re: Emptying Trash Fails with 'Error while expunging folder'

2008-11-24 Thread MiiJaySung
Hi, I think what I suggested at
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+question/50690
should fix things. Evolution changed it's mail format recently, so the
searching for ev-summary files doesn't do anything, which is why that
fix doesn't work in Ibex. instead remove the index / cmeta / index.data
files

-- 
Emptying Trash Fails with 'Error while expunging folder'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287811
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs