[Bug 2051999] Re: Grub2 2.06 has upstream bug that results in Non-booting with ZFS after snapshot of bpool.
@mate --- I checked the changelogs of the current Grub2 packages for Jammy. I don't see patches for this issue yet. The last updates for Grub2 packages for Jammy were in April, and were for ARM, and a CVE security update by you. Because that was "Security", I understand that those took precedence. But is now 2 months since then, with no updates/patches. You said 2.12 was patched, but current Grub2 in Jammy is still 2.06-2ubuntu7.2 amd64... Any expected timeline for Jammy? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051999 Title: Grub2 2.06 has upstream bug that results in Non-booting with ZFS after snapshot of bpool. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2051999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2051999] Re: Grub2 2.06 has upstream bug that results in Non-booting with ZFS after snapshot of bpool.
Those compatibility flags, mirror the pool create options I noted above... With doing a snapshot of bpool, and Send'ing it 'somewhere', even if that was to a flash-drive... Destroying the original bpool, recreate the new bpool, then Receive, the snapshot back to restore it, does fix that with less than 2GB of storage. That is just one work-around. I've started (manually) making bpool's 3GB on ZFS-On-Root installs, to allow more room for my snapshots... Upgrading Grub2 to 2.12, from 2.12rc and previous, fixes the problem also. There is 3-4 work-around listed in this report that works. --- Sideline Note: Someone (wprince) contacted me via email asking for assistance on their company's production email server being affected by this bug. Which means they are probably subscribed to this Bug Report... Hopefully you see this. Your email address is gets a server error where the DNS record is missing to that server. Cannot reply back unless you give me some alternate contact info. tried. Sorry. Please try again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051999 Title: Grub2 2.06 has upstream bug that results in Non-booting with ZFS after snapshot of bpool. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/2051999/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951733] Re: My screen freezes during a USB live session and I can't install Ubuntu
I believe it to be a firmware issue... It should be move to another area and filed against "something". This is not a question, nor a bug against Launchpad... This is a BUG. But it "is" unknown just which piece, module, system, etc, "is" causing his problem, to file it as a BUG against something specific. Please move this to an appropriate place so that it does get attention, in some kind of timely manner. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951733 Title: My screen freezes during a USB live session and I can't install Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1951733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1951733] Re: My screen freezes during a USB live session and I can't install Ubuntu
This User needs to submit his logs and errors, and do any back-traces you all think necessary. He has worked with us at UbuntuForums, it seems to be a case were it occasionally gets an error where "it cannot claim a resource." The specific errors that it is getting, on the hardware, seems to affect. Some thoughts on this error vary from maybe being a video issue, firmware, BIOS, the USB controller, etc. This person's computer is "New and still under warranty." The Vendors say that there is not a BIOS upgrade for it. The Vendor had him ship back the computer to them, where they supposedly tested it extensively "with Windows", but found no problem. He can run 18.04 LTS... But has problems with anything newer. I see this problem on the same or similar hardware, not just in Ubuntu, but also in other Linux Distributions. "I" asked this User to escalate his problem to Launchpad. Yes, he could take this computer back and try to get his money back on it before the warranty expires, but something it wrong that needs to be investigated and resolved with this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951733 Title: My screen freezes during a USB live session and I can't install Ubuntu To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad/+bug/1951733/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943001] Re: hwe 20.04 kernel 5.11 series hang at graphical login leaving laptop unusable
Mine is a desktop with NVidia and has occurred since the update to linux-generic-5.11.-00.34. But the same machine works fine on Mainline 5.11.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943001 Title: hwe 20.04 kernel 5.11 series hang at graphical login leaving laptop unusable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta-hwe-5.11/+bug/1943001/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1800740] Re: /usr/share/applications/evolution-calendar.desktop Exec program 'evolution -c calendar' has not ben found in th PATH
This had affected me... I discovered this when starting menulibre, as a parse error. On diagnosis of my system, I was just going to remove evolution and reinstall it to to see if that fixed the problem... # sudo apt-get remove evolution Even though the evoltution-calendar.desktop file existed in my /usr/share/applications directory, the system (in fact) was correct in saying it couldn't find evolution in the run path... Because on my system (at least), the Evolution package was not installed. So: # sudo apt-get update # sudo apt-get install evolution evolution-ews Now menulibre parses evolution-calendar.desktop correctly on my system (and it shows in the Gnome Application Menu DropDown), because it is "now present" in the PATH on my system... (LOL) That was my work-around. On my guess of what happened to cause this for me on my old laptop?: I had installed Lubuntu 18.04 (32 bit), not 64 bit version like the OP... I had then installed Gnome 3 Desktop and Ubuntu Desktop... in ubuntu-desktop, while installing default apps of, I think it ommited the Evolution package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1800740 Title: /usr/share/applications/evolution-calendar.desktop Exec program 'evolution -c calendar' has not ben found in th PATH To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/menulibre/+bug/1800740/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
correction on last... # removed sudo update-alternatives --remove default.plymouth /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 Title: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
Update- This is how I fixed mine... Adapt to your own system. # look at the old directory ls -ltrd /lib/plymouth/themes #look at the newer plymouth directory to compare ls -ltrd /usr/share/plymouth/themes if differerent, mobe the old to the newer... sudo mv /lib/plymouth/themes /usr/share/plymouth/themes sudo gedit /usr/share/plymouth/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth At this point, I edited that theme file to change the two file path references from "/lib/plymouth" to "/usr/share/plymouth". This is needed for the script to find the new path to the themes in the newer directory... Note that this answer was given in response #14 but was incomplete. Once you move the files, then you need to reset the update-alternatives for the updated default.plymouth... #add an updated update-alternatives link to the new plymouth file directory sudo update-alternatives --install /usr/share/plymouth/themes/default.plymouth default.plymouth /usr/share/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth 100 #select that entry sudo update-alternatives --config default.plymouth # hinted at in response #13, the plymouth at boot, runs from the intramfs image, so the image needs to be updated first... sudo update-initramfs -u #then reboot to test sudo shutdown -r now If successful... mine was... then # remove the old default.plymouth entry from update alternatives... sudo update-alternatives --remove default.plymouth /usr/share/plymouth/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth # check to ensure the extra entry is gone... sudo update-alternatives --config default.plymouth press enter to remain unchanged... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 Title: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
Apport is now catching a system error on /sbin/plymouth... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 Title: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
I see Cyber Sec committed those packages as a fix for this bug ... I followed his recommends and tested. But I can confirm that they are not a fix for mine. What next? You need more info or a back-trace? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 Title: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
As reference to trying the fix recommended by Cyber Sec in post #7... That did not fix mine. Downloading and manually installing those .deb packages ... Installed fine, but it resulted in no change on mine (same errors). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 Title: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1525699] Re: Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
This also affects me. I marked my own bug report (Bug #1594204) as a
duplicate this.
I've already done an install --reinstall, as "axel" was afraid to do,
and that does not affect the error in any way.
Also, the files that that script is looking for-- are confirmed to be
physically on my system.
Background on me? Check my memberships. I am somewhat modest, but am
used to tracking problems down and coming up with work-arounds.
Error Message on mine is:
/scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /sbin/plymouthd: not found
/scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /bin/plymouth: not found
/dev/sda3: clean 605474/22757376 files, 66338383/91016257 blocks
/scripts/init-bottom/plymouth: line 18/bin/plymouth: not found
My results of: $ ls /sbin/plymouthd && ls /bin/plymouth
/sbin/plymouthd
/bin/plymouth
...which confirms that those files are there.
## Specific errors are from ##
# script codeblock from usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-
premount/plymouth staring at line 33 is:
if [ "${SPLASH}" = "true" ]
then
mkdir -m 0755 /run/plymouth
/sbin/plymouthd --mode=boot --attach-to-session
--pid-file=/run/plymouth/pid
/bin/plymouth --show-splash
fi
# script line from usr/share/initramfs-tools/scripts/init-
bottom/plymouth line 18 is:
/bin/plymouth --newroot=${rootmnt}
## End Code ##
My results of: $ sudo ls -l /run/plymouth
total 0
So it is creating the /run/plymouth, but is empty (no pid file)
I am running the animated ubuntu-sunrise theme... the affects the boot
theme, but not the shutdown theme. If I change themes, the boot theme
will work once, then be boinked again. But the errors are showing even
in that instance of the boot theme working...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699
Title:
Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1525699/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] Re: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1525699 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1525699 After some more research, I'm marking this as a duplicate to Bug #1525699. This is the same bug, and that one seems to be the original bug report(?) Not sure that all my problems are covered by that, but at least the error messages are the same... I joined that bug as affecting me. As a sideline affect of: It is strange that if I switch plymouth themes, the shutdown theme works fine every time. The boot theme will work once for a single boot, then be boinked again. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1525699 Error message "/sbin/plymouthd: not found" is shown on booting -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] Re: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
I noticed that the apport dump had the correct default plymouth (showing where default is pointing to... but apport incorrectly dumped the text of another plymouth theme script (sabina) besides the one that is being pointed to Attached is the ubuntu-sunrise.script ** Attachment added: "ubuntu-sunrise.script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+attachment/4687512/+files/ubuntu-sunrise.script -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] Re: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
Results of: $ ls /sbin/plymouthd && ls /bin/plymouth /sbin/plymouthd /bin/plymouth So those two files are there... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] Re: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
As requested: File /var/log/apt/term.log attached ** Attachment added: "/var/log/apt/term.log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+attachment/4687511/+files/term.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] Re: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
Message is: /scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /sbin/plymouthd: not found /scripts/init-premount/plymouth: line 38: /bin/plymouth: not found /dev/sda3: clean 605474/22757376 files, 66338383/91016257 blocks /scripts/init-bottom/plymouth: line 18/bin/plymouth: not found Spoke too soon. Plymouth is intermittantly successful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1594204] [NEW] plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script
Public bug reported: Just id a release upgrade from 14.04.3 LTS to 16.04 LTS. Now on login, during plymouth init, console messages are reporting plymouth script errors of missing file from various bin directories (will take a pic of them and report then later). Plymouth theme is not the default. Use the old animated Ubuntu Sunrise theme. On first few boots, it was only displaying partial of the animation. Shutdown plymouth animation was fine. Rechecked my /etc/default/grub settings. As before and working for the all virtual terminal sessions. did an install reinstall of plymouth then a dpkg-reconfigure plymouth- theme to recheck settings. Were good. On boot now-- Same error messages, but both Plymouth animations work fine. So plymouth is working, but with displayed errors on init. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: plymouth 0.9.2-3ubuntu13.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-24.43-generic 4.4.10 Uname: Linux 4.4.0-24-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_uvm nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jun 19 16:45:18 2016 DefaultPlymouth: /lib/plymouth/themes/ubuntu-sunrise/ubuntu-sunrise.plymouth InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-26 (1240 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120823.1) MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-24-generic root=UUID=e8e5733f-6875-491b-b5cc-21d6aac83f78 ro quiet splash nomodeset video=uvesafb:mode_option=1920x1080-32,mtrr=3,scroll=ywrap ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_US TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcFB: 0 VESA VGA ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.4.0-24-generic root=UUID=e8e5733f-6875-491b-b5cc-21d6aac83f78 ro quiet splash nomodeset video=uvesafb:mode_option=1920x1080-32,mtrr=3,scroll=ywrap SourcePackage: plymouth TextPlymouth: /usr/share/plymouth/themes/sabily/sabily-text.plymouth UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2016-06-19 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 01/03/2011 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1102 dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M. dmi.board.name: P7P55 LX dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC. dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr1102:bd01/03/2011:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7P55LX:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion: dmi.product.name: System Product Name dmi.product.version: System Version dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer ** Affects: plymouth (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594204 Title: plymouth reports missinfg plymouth files referenced from default plymouth script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plymouth/+bug/1594204/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1419549] [NEW] grub2 crashes on install
Public bug reported: 15.05 Gnome alpha 1 (on install from ISO) x 3 times. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: ubiquity 2.21.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-28.38-generic 3.16.7-ckt1 Uname: Linux 3.16.0-28-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.15-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.347 Date: Sun Feb 8 14:31:05 2015 InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu-gnome.seed boot=casper only-ubiquity quiet splash -- LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-GNOME 15.04 "Vivid Vervet" - Alpha amd64 (20141218) ProcEnviron: TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SourcePackage: grub-installer UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ubiquity-2.21.1 ubuntu-gnome vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1419549 Title: grub2 crashes on install To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1419549/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1375511] Re: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great
This was my usual install script (attached). Notice the comments at the minimum install of the XServer Core. Used to install and work fine --withoutrecommends. Now I have to remove that flag from it... and let it install full. There most be another dependency there "somewhere" now. (not sure yet where.) But removed my X install (remove from the last line going backwards) and re-installed with this updated script... and it works fine now. -- Closed? ** Attachment added: "minimalx.sh" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+attachment/4221988/+files/minimalx.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511 Title: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1375511] Re: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great
>From lspci: 00:03.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Rage XL PCI [1002:4752] (rev 27) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Subsystem: Compaq Computer Corporation Proliant Rage XL [0e11:001e] Flags: bus master, stepping, medium devsel, latency 64 Memory at f600 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16M] I/O ports at 2400 [size=256] Memory at f5ff (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=4K] [virtual] Expansion ROM at 8000 [disabled] [size=128K] Capabilities: -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511 Title: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1375511] Re: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great
xorg.0.log file from that server: ** Attachment added: "xorg.0.log file" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+attachment/4219766/+files/Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511 Title: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1375511] [NEW] XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great
Public bug reported: System is now Server 14.04, with a minimal X install (openbox, etc...) and package xserver-xorg-video-mach64 was installed and is the newest version. I just upgraded that server from 12.04LTS Server. Before the upgrade, it had worked fine using startx to boot an instance of X for doing maintenance. Did a release upgrade (today) to 14.04 and it's now broke. XLog has that same exact message. Diving into it right now to check it out (see why it broke). Other users on the forum are also having this problem: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2241397&p=13132193 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 6.9.4-1build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-36.63-generic 3.13.11.6 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-36-generic i686 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.4 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Sep 29 16:26:16 2014 InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-04-05 (542 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 12.04.2 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release i386 (20130214) ProcEnviron: TERM=linux PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-29 (0 days ago) ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-mach64 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511 Title: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1375511] Re: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great
Remember that without xserver coming up, if you want info, back traces or logs, that it will be from the command line from that server. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1375511 Title: XServer modprobe: FATAL: Module mach64 not found. 14.04.1. 12.04 worked great To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-mach64/+bug/1375511/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1351639] Re: package nvidia-opencl-icd-331-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.331.38', which is also in package
If you want to hear the kicker on that(?): I just did a check of my install packages on that box... And nvidia-331-updates NVIDIA binary driver - version 331.38 (ver 7.1) says it's installed. So it did instal,l but somewhere/somehow set off an error report as a crash? If you know me from helping users over the years with XServer and the Linux graphics layer, you know I am not a new, nor normal user. But this an interesting quark. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1351639 Title: package nvidia-opencl-icd-331-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu /libnvidia-opencl.so.331.38', which is also in package nvidia-opencl- icd-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1351639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1351639] Re: package nvidia-opencl-icd-331-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libnvidia-opencl.so.331.38', which is also in package
This is still a problem on one of mine (my main box that I also use for the console for my servers). This box has been running 14.04 and nvidia-current (331.38) since it's realease. Only reason was going to 331.xx update was that I run Gnome 3 and for some reason 331.xx boink's any resolutions but low-res in Gnome 3 Native, but fine in all other desktop modes (Gnome or Unity). But anyways 331.xx to 331.xx Update crashes the install from inside "Additional drivers." -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1351639 Title: package nvidia-opencl-icd-331-updates (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu /libnvidia-opencl.so.331.38', which is also in package nvidia-opencl- icd-331 331.38-0ubuntu7.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-331-updates/+bug/1351639/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174034] Re: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
Working fine in Unity and Gnome3... Problem just in Gnome Fallback. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034 Title: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1174034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174034] Re: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
I am mistaken in that this error also includes nautilus. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034 Title: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1174034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174034] Re: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
One other note- If I select the "_" decoration on the gtk.Window, the whole top bar on that window grey's out losing focus... and act's if it is unresponsive. If I then select the app from the lower taskbar, then it regains focus and starts working normally (all working correctly)... until closed and restarted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034 Title: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1174034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1174034] [NEW] gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing.
Public bug reported: (Gnome Fallback) Since upgrade to 13.04- Gedit not exiting from the "x" decoration or minimizing from the "_" decoration. Selecting "X" will minimze the app. Fill menu will close doc's and exit. Right click on lower taskbar> close will quit app... But GTK window taskbar "X" will not quit. Selecting the lower taskbar, will minimize app. All other desktop app's seem to work normally. ??? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04 Package: gedit 3.6.2-0ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-19.29-generic 3.8.8 Uname: Linux 3.8.0-19-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Apr 28 12:03:15 2013 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/gedit InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-26 (92 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64 (20120823.1) MarkForUpload: True ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: gedit UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to raring on 2013-04-26 (1 days ago) ** Affects: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug raring -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174034 Title: gedit not closing, exiting or minimizing. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/1174034/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 907311] Re: Not exiting properly? "An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting"
I am one of those "duplicates" joining this bug as directed, because someone pointed my bug report as a duplicate to this one. Of note- I have a work-around. I noticed that after I run Brasero and exit, the process is still running. That is why it is not starting a "new" instance of Brasero. So my fix is to bring up a terminal session ... Type in: pidof Brasero It will return the process ID of four digits long. For example: 8573. If the returned process ID where 8573, then you would type in: kill 8573 to end that process. Once that process is killed, Brasero will run again. Note that this is a work-around. You have to kill the process manually, because brasero is not really exiting "gracefully." In fact since it still has a process ID, itis really "not exiting..." Therefore the problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/907311 Title: Not exiting properly? "An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/907311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145286] Re: Brasero runs once then fails
//*** ~$ brasero -g --brasero-media-debug > log 2>&1 ~$ cat log ** (brasero:7386): WARNING **: An instance of Brasero is already running, exiting ~$ pidof brasero 2585 :~$ kill 2585 ***// ...and it works again without a reboot. But the new instance also stays loaded after exit. This may be a duplicate of bug #972962... But that bug was on v12.04 n commandline. This is on v12.10 and both commandline and through GUI. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145286 Title: Brasero runs once then fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1145286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145286] Re: Brasero runs once then fails
I've been using Ubuntu since 8.04LTS... And I've been testing U+1 for 4-5 years on other boxes and servers here, but this is on my main everyday box (no U+1 dev). I cleaned things up on this one and did a fresh re-Install 37 days ago. It did this in v12.04 also (7 days ago upgraded this box to v12.10 ). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145286 Title: Brasero runs once then fails To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1145286/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1145286] [NEW] Brasero runs once then fails
Public bug reported:
On a fresh system boot, Brasero runs well. After burning ISO to disk and
closing application, Brasero will try to start ("Starting Brasero"),
then just go away. Have to reboot to get it going again.
Seem's like Brasero is not exiting gracefully, so cannot restart.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: brasero 3.4.1-0ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-25.39-generic 3.5.7.4
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-25-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.6.1-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Mar 4 13:32:31 2013
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-01-26 (37 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Release amd64
(20120823.1)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
TERM=xterm
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: brasero
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2013-02-23 (9 days ago)
** Affects: brasero (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug quantal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1145286
Title:
Brasero runs once then fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/brasero/+bug/1145286/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1115555] Re: Backlight control does not work, but there are entries in /sys/class/backlight.
Had been working with this user on forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2112027 I've confirmed that his /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness data can be changed, but those changes do not get picked up. What he didn't mention yet... is that if he does reboot to MAC OSX, changes the brightness setting there, then reboots the hardware back into Ubuntu, the MAC OSX changed setting is retained. He has a functional workaround, but it is outside Ubuntu and the Linux kernel. Changes within Ubuntu do not make affect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111 Title: Backlight control does not work, but there are entries in /sys/class/backlight. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1115555] Re: Backlight control does not work, but there are entries in /sys/class/backlight.
Had been working with this user on forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2112027 I've confirmed that his /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/brightness data can be changed, but those changes do not get picked up. What he didn't mention yet... is that if he does reboot to MAC OSX, changes the brightness setting there, then reboots the hardware back into Ubuntu, the MAC OSX changed setting is retained. He has a functional workaround, but it is outside Ubuntu and the Linux kernel. Changes within Ubuntu do not make affect. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111 Title: Backlight control does not work, but there are entries in /sys/class/backlight. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/111/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] Re: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
Tried to submit- "apport-collect 923594" logged into launchpad... but don't see it here. Tried to resend, but now apport collect gets a segmentation fault. (???) When it collects it, does it write it anywhere where I could submit it remotely? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] Re: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
v10.10, Same. v10.04.3 installed fine but- "Segmentation Faulty Tree" error even after "sudo rm /var/cache/apt/*.bin" (which usually fixes that). That means no updates, upgrades nor a release upgrade. Cannot install a browser. I can ssh into it to extract info from other boxes. Other notes- runs Win Server 2000, 2003 and 2008 fine. Was originally certified on SUSE and RedHat. No I haven't tried with those 2, but current version of OpenSuse fails. Will try Solaris and Fedora, just to see if I comeup with any pattern with what I've seen so far... The errors seem to be mostly on expansion of the debian file (extraction and writing of). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] Re: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
Okay, so these tests are with a bare board = none of the RAID Cards or it's SCSI card. 11.04 froze at loading additional components. 11.10 froze at same point. 11.10 with a 32bit Intel Card thrown in... continued through hwdiscovery, saw both the Intel Card and the onboard Broadcom card. Selected the Intel. Got to the Install Base system and errored out at this point: (Copied by hand) ## debootstrap: dpkg: error processing lib6 (--install): subprocess installed post-installation script was killed by signal (segmentation fault) kernel: [ 385.505955] frontend[18772]: segfault at 7fdb ip 005a0d08 sp bf80cefc error 4 in libc-2.13.so[52b000+176000] debootstrap: Errors were encountered while processing: debootstrap: libc6 base-installer: error: exiting on error base-installer/debootstrap-failed main-menu[321]: WARNING **: Configuring 'bootstrap-base' failed main-menu[321]: WARNING **: Menu item: 'bootstrap-base' failed with error code 1 ## And it just goes south from there... This is on a Ubuntu Server 11.10 Install CD that tests out good. I can also confirm that it's functional, as I have installed from it both here and onto customer's. Going to install older so I can report their issues and post the hardware info. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] Re: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
I just looked through my past launch pad bugs. I had this board up previously on Server 11.04: Bug #829846 You can see the info there... Curious why it's having errors now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] Re: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 923594] [NEW] Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server...
Public bug reported: Hewlett Packard TC2120 Server (Rebranded ASUS NRL-LS motherboard) Have tried installing Ubuntu Server, versions 12.04 alpha, 11.10, 11.04, 10.10, 10.04. All versions fail at either the initial base system load (such as a bootstrap error) or at an get/apt error or the package load/configure. If I set the vga mode at the start of the install, then I do get the prompt to load non-free firmware for the onboard Broadcom NetXtreme. Even after loading this, it gets the same problems... After dropping in a vanilla Intel NIC, then it could install Server 10.04 LTS without any complaints, but... It would have apt-cache errors. I would have to delete the *.bin files in the apt-cache before any update/upgrade. It would not do a release upgrade with prompt=normal without crashing. I've got 5 other servers on Ubuntu Server and would like this one up on it also. This was reported from my main box and not from this system. If you want that, I'll throw this board on a test bench case and Install 10.04 on it. Or if you want the errors from any of the other versions... Just ask. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: debootstrap 1.0.29ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-13.54-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-13-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Architecture: amd64 Date: Sun Jan 29 20:17:52 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release amd64 (20100429) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_US:en SourcePackage: debootstrap UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-29 (275 days ago) ** Affects: debootstrap (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923594 Title: Will not install cleanly on this server- HP TC 2120, any version of Server... To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/923594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 902636] Re: missing xserver-xorg-video-nv
Here is one of the user's xorg log. ** Attachment added: "Users Xorg.0,log" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+bug/902636/+attachment/2627374/+files/Bub.Xorg.0.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902636 Title: missing xserver-xorg-video-nv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+bug/902636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 902636] [NEW] missing xserver-xorg-video-nv
Public bug reported: xserver-xorg-video-nv is in the repo's thru Natty. Then is not found in the repo's of Oneiric and Precise. If this package has been replced by another, there is no indication of this at Debian or X.org. On nvidia user's of Onieric and Precise(dev), this throws an error in their Xorg logs that :nv" cannot be found. They tried to install this package to correct that error, but agian not found. On my search through the repo's they would use, not found -and- the trail of that package seemed to have stopped at Natty. Not a problem for me (personally), but for the users I support in the Ubuntu Installations & Updates Forum ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.1.0-1.1-generic 3.1.0-rc10 Uname: Linux 3.1.0-1-generic i686 .tmp.unity.support.test.1: ApportVersion: 1.26-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 CompizPlugins: No value set for `/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins' CompositorRunning: None Date: Sat Dec 10 12:16:57 2011 DistUpgraded: Fresh install DistroCodename: precise DistroVariant: ubuntu DkmsStatus: virtualbox-guest, 4.1.6, 3.1.0-1-generic, i686: installed ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, whatever it takes to get this fixed in Ubuntu GraphicsCard: InnoTek Systemberatung GmbH VirtualBox Graphics Adapter [80ee:beef] (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111010) Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021 VirtualBox USB Tablet MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.1.0-1-generic root=UUID=c0652f22-b55a-4b00-bdec-85aac3b1c29f ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Renderer: Software SourcePackage: xorg UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2: dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.6+bzr20110929-0ubuntu7 version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.27-1ubuntu1 version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 7.11-0ubuntu4 version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 7.11-0ubuntu4 version.xserver-xorg: xserver-xorg 1:7.6+7ubuntu7 version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.6.0-1ubuntu13 version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:6.14.99~git20110811.g93fc084-0ubuntu1 version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.15.901-1ubuntu3 version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:0.0.16+git20110411+8378443-1 ** Affects: xserver-xorg-video-nv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise regression single-occurrence ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902636 Title: missing xserver-xorg-video-nv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+bug/902636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 902636] Re: missing xserver-xorg-video-nv
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/902636 Title: missing xserver-xorg-video-nv To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-nv/+bug/902636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
I checked again tonight = bugzilla.kernel.org still down. Since you here don't want to file upstream and talked me into it... I'll continue this through. (although I thought that was what the Kernel Team did, but no matters.) > One alternative would be to report this directly to the subsystem maintainer > or to the LKML. ??? Point me in a clear direction and I'll follow it. - Who is the subsystem maintainer? - Join the linux-kernel mailing list at vger.kernel.org? I was wondering about that, but wondered how asking an off-topic about how bugs are currently being handled would go over on the kernel discussion list. There are over 100 linux lists there. I'll join the linux-kernel list, ask and see how it goes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
Quoted from- Joseph Salisbury (jsalisbury), Post #7: >Would it be possible for you to open an upstream bug report at >bugzilla.kernel.org? Tried To... Quoted from kernel.org: >>Reporting Linux Kernel bugs >> >>Please see http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/lkml/reporting-bugs.html if >>you want to report a Linux kernel bug. >>Bug reports sent to the kernel.org administrators will be ignored. >> >>There is now a bugzilla setup at bugzilla.kernel.org. Currently this is for >>reporting kernel version 2.6 bugs only. Tried both Links --> Dead kinks. Any other ideas? I'm thinking it may have been related to their last status in their Site News: >As noted previously, kernel.org suffered a security breach. Because of this, >we have taken the time to rearchitect >the site in order to improve our systems for developers and users of >kernel.org. To this end, we would like all >developers who previously had access to kernel.org who wish to continue to use >it to host their git and static >content, to follow the instructions here. > >Right now, www.kernel.org and git.kernel.org have been brought back online. >All developer git trees have been >removed from git.kernel.org and will be added back as the relevant developers >regain access to the system. > >Thanks to all for your patience and understanding during our outage and please >bear with us as we bring up >the different kernel.org systems over the next few weeks. We will be writing >up a report on the incident in the >future. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
But Debian 6.0 with kernel 2.6.32-5-686 does work with the "text" kernel boot parameter. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
Oh, By the way... this also happens in Precise Pangolin 12.04 pre-alpha. But that's not really a fair statement, as we only had access to those repo's since last Thursday. Not really enough diversity between those 2 versions yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
Mainline kernel 3.1.0~rc10 (linux- image-3.1.0-030100rc10-generic_3.1.0-030100rc10.201110200610) has same results. ** Tags removed: needs-upstream-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
So no activity from any lauchpad team yet? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 876146] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). The Upgrade Popup does not warn of the risks or offers fail-safe alternatives. This is a mouse trap for unsuspecting users.
Offhand the past 5 days helping user with what broke has been adventurous... I think the main update issue lies in the dist-upgarde process. In the last 3 dev testing cycles, one thing has been nagging at ne is that there is no prior testing to see if an existing previous version will successfully do a distribution upgrade to the pre-release. That would see before hand what things would break right? Instead, we just did it. Along side of this is new installs. There is existing bugs and issues graphically with the installer, that we tell users to correct manually. Can we not add some kind of logic to sort some of these issues out? It already probes hardware to configure an install. It already has a user selected 3rd party button to configure proprietary software. Could it not configure appropriate graphics drivers, so that the first reboot doesn't end at the now infamous blackscreen? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876146 Title: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). The Upgrade Popup does not warn of the risks or offers fail-safe alternatives. This is a mouse trap for unsuspecting users. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/876146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] [NEW] Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
Public bug reported: Past kernel boot lines, tool runlevel arguments at boot time. In other distros, you added "1" for single user text, "2", "3", "4" or "5" for multiuser text mode... Ubuntu, along the way changed this and used the kernel boot option "text". Somewhere between natty and oneiric, that "text" kernel boot option went away. I mentioned this during dev testing months ago and was left unanswered... This cabality never returned. All these runlevels are still available from a commandline in a termeinal or consolde session once the System is booted. But that is not the problem or need. If you have a system that does not boot into a GUI... Of TTY Text Console modes, there is now only the option to boot into runlevel (single)? What happened to the ability of Multi-user-modes? I usually setup that as one of my Grub2 40_custom menu items on my own boxes. If this has changed in syntax, it doesn't seem to be documented. I do know that during testing, when I had installed server - then runlevel 2 was there. If on that same server if I installed an xxx-desktop package then either the kernel or the default runlevel setting was changed and only booting directly to a GUI was there. Yes users could go recovery > Root or remount then netroot... but newer users get lost there. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: linux-image-3.0.0-12-generic 3.0.0-12.20 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic i686 AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. AplayDevices: List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices card 0: I82801AAICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH], device 0: Intel ICH [Intel 82801AA-ICH] Subdevices: 1/1 Subdevice #0: subdevice #0 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: i386 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: mafoelffen 1581 F pulseaudio CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Card0.Amixer.info: Card hw:0 'I82801AAICH'/'Intel 82801AA-ICH with STAC9700,83,84 at irq 5' Mixer name : 'SigmaTel STAC9700,83,84' Components : 'AC97a:83847600' Controls : 34 Simple ctrls : 24 CurrentDmesg: [ 551.527233] hrtimer: interrupt took 17278946 ns Date: Sat Oct 15 14:48:29 2011 HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=94f6c962-58fa-4888-ac33-6b5932c3c699 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111010) IwConfig: lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub Bus 001 Device 002: ID 80ee:0021 VirtualBox USB Tablet MachineType: innotek GmbH VirtualBox ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-12-generic root=UUID=fe9c64dd-2eb0-4c3c-ba46-ffe0cd8c1162 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-3.0.0-12-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-3.0.0-12-generic N/A linux-firmware1.60 RfKill: SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 12/01/2006 dmi.bios.vendor: innotek GmbH dmi.bios.version: VirtualBox dmi.modalias: dmi:bvninnotekGmbH:bvrVirtualBox:bd12/01/2006:svninnotekGmbH:pnVirtualBox:pvr1.2: dmi.product.name: VirtualBox dmi.product.version: 1.2 dmi.sys.vendor: innotek GmbH ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 875352] Re: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options.
I reported this one from a generic VirtualBox install of 11.10 so anyone can reproduce it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875352 Title: Linux 3.0.x kernel with Ubuntu does not take runlevel 2-4 arguments as boot options. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
Okay... Re-ran apport-collect 829846 from that server after reseting my launchpad password... Had to overcome some texted-based browser issues, but in background it said it sent and is waiting for launchpad to respond... With a message saying "Almost Finished." Following the link from there got me to a test-based launchpad screen that asked how long I wanted to authorize that particular machine to use my launchpad account... then to my own test-based launchpad account screen... Looking at the bug page (from my main pc), that apport report never showed up. Wait- let me try again to confirm. Well- Seems that now it's "authorized" now it works straight from the commandline. But as it looks, is the same format report that I sent to you the first time via remote. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298277/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298276/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298275/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298274/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298273/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] ProcCpuinfo_.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo_.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298272/+files/ProcCpuinfo_.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298271/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298270/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298269/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected natty ** Description changed: nopam and apm=off now has no effect in Ubuntu Server versions 11.04 and 11.10. I noticed this in 11.04 alpha thru release and 11.10 prealpha thru alpha3. These 2 kernel boot options should turn off APM (power management) and prevent the console monitor from going blank at the 10 minute default. Have looked for 8 months for a workaround or alternative. Desktop Edition kernel versions do-not have this problem-- There was a test case where a server edition kernel had desktop package installed and the server kernel updated... when then there was no problem <> But the native-unchanged server kernel is affected by this problem. According to past experience with Ubuntu Desktop and Server Edition versions earlier than 11.04 (8.04 through 10.10), Ubuntu Server's kernel had a default apm setting of being on, and having the default tty text console set to turn off (blank) at 10 minutes. In a production monitoring environment this is not always desirable. - # I'm reporting this from another node on my network, but including the - apport report from it. + # I'm reporting this from another node on my network, but including the apport report from it. + --- + AlsaDevices: + total 0 + crw--- 1 root root 116, 1 2011-08-21 12:39 seq + crw--- 1 root root 116, 33 2011-08-21 12:39 timer + AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Architecture: i386 + ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: + CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + CurrentDmesg: [ 38.640022] eth0: no IPv6 routers present + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 + HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=a23cdc5e-a7f0-4caa-abce-e34479860d19 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Release i386 (20110426) + IwConfig: + lono wireless extensions. + + eth0 no wireless extensions. + Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + MachineType: Hewlett-Packard HP Server + Package: linux (not installed) + PciMultimedia: + + ProcEnviron: + LANG=en_US.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic-pae root=UUID=fe77625e-1e17-44fa-883c-e97dd7359509 ro quiet apm=off + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic-pae 2.6.38.8 + RelatedPackageVersions: + linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-11-generic-pae N/A + linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-11-generic-pae N/A + linux-firmware 1.52 + RfKill: + + Tags: natty + Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic-pae i686 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare + dmi.bios.date: 04/25/2003 + dmi.bios.vendor: Award Software, Inc. + dmi.bios.version: 6.00.21 RV (04/25/2003) + dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890 + dmi.chassis.type: 6 + dmi.chassis.vendor: Hewlett-Packard + dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAwardSoftware,Inc.:bvr6.00.21RV(04/25/2003):bd04/25/2003:svnHewlett-Packard:pnHPServer:pvrTC2120:cvnHewlett-Packard:ct6:cvrChassisVersion: + dmi.product.name: HP Server + dmi.product.version: TC2120 + dmi.sys.vendor: Hewlett-Packard ** Attachment added: "AcpiTables.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2298268/+files/AcpiTables.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
Did I mention that it happens on all my servers? I have single cpu and dual cpu; intel and amd cpu; 11.04 and 11.10... The one I pulled offline to test for this has an HP ASUS LRT-LS Server board with Ubuntu Server 11.04 x86 installed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
The above attachment was via "ubuntu-bug linux" from that server... Since that server did not has no desktop installed on it or a text-based browser installed, I copied the apport report to a shared data directory... Which I accessed from my main desktop machine that autologs into Launchpad using my openPPG key from that machine... I took that server offline (as a test server) and put another up in it's place, which is what I do anyways , so not an issue. This is a home network with 4 servers, 7 mixed-OS desktops, NAS and other network attached peripherals... I put the kernel boot line "apm=off" back into /etc/default/grub and installed elinks in order for apport to work from that server, so you can see it "not work"... to submit "apport-collect 829846" ...that worked until- it got to my launchpad account login where it says my password does not match. Any ideas on that? Or since it is a server that has an issue, might it be easier accessed remotely from my main desktop box to access the logs to send to you? (I know the password issue is still something I need to track and settle...) ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] Re: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
** Attachment added: "apport.linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic-pae.LfaqfF.apport" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846/+attachment/2293452/+files/apport.linux-image-2.6.38-8-generic-pae.LfaqfF.apport -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 829846] [NEW] linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working
Public bug reported: nopam and apm=off now has no effect in Ubuntu Server versions 11.04 and 11.10. I noticed this in 11.04 alpha thru release and 11.10 prealpha thru alpha3. These 2 kernel boot options should turn off APM (power management) and prevent the console monitor from going blank at the 10 minute default. Have looked for 8 months for a workaround or alternative. Desktop Edition kernel versions do-not have this problem-- There was a test case where a server edition kernel had desktop package installed and the server kernel updated... when then there was no problem <> But the native-unchanged server kernel is affected by this problem. According to past experience with Ubuntu Desktop and Server Edition versions earlier than 11.04 (8.04 through 10.10), Ubuntu Server's kernel had a default apm setting of being on, and having the default tty text console set to turn off (blank) at 10 minutes. In a production monitoring environment this is not always desirable. # I'm reporting this from another node on my network, but including the apport report from it. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/829846 Title: linux kernel parm apm=off or noapm not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/829846/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 33075] Re: Dell Inspiron 8200 Nvidia proprietary driver causes display errors (vertical lines on the right, and mirror effect on the bottom)[Workaround Available]
Just saw this bug while researching another problem... Reference the question in #17, I recommend to others both the get-edid of package read-edid to get the EDID of a display using the coomand line... " get-edid > edid1.bin " ...or if they can get gnome to display, using nvidia-settings to generate it (in NVidia XServer Settings > Device > Display > Acquire EDID ) Current problem / limitation) with get-edid is that it will only read the "first" display and not of any multilples beyond that. The author of the read-edid ipackage s working on expanding that. "nvidia- settings" will get the EDID of displays past the first, but needs to be running in gnome to be able to run. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33075 Title: Dell Inspiron 8200 Nvidia proprietary driver causes display errors (vertical lines on the right, and mirror effect on the bottom)[Workaround Available] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted-modules-2.6.15/+bug/33075/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787274] Re: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787274 Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 787274] [NEW] package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gconf While running updates... ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-2.8-generic-pae 2.6.39-rc7 Uname: Linux 2.6.39-2-generic-pae i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Thu May 19 23:13:41 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 11.04 "Natty Narwhal" - Beta 1 i386 (20110329.2) SourcePackage: gconf Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 oneiric unity-2d -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/787274 Title: package gconf2 2.32.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Un-Identified Process causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
** Summary changed: - Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. + Un-Identified Process causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Un-Identified Process causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 759103] Re: [STAGING] (Regression) Kernel panic with 2.6.38-8 and acpi on
Many bugs have been refried as a duplicate of this bug, Helping people on this support forum sticky: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=10740083#post10740083 We;ve found that most of the time where they would need to use acpi=off or noacpi to get graphics to work, that it did cause other acpi related problems. We further found that if they manually set the GRUB_GFXMODE=[WIDTHxHEIGTH|xDEPTH] in /etc/default/grub and further added a vesa vga mode set to the kernel boot line via vga=xxx, where xxx is a supported vesa mode by their hardware, that they no longer needed the acpi=off kernel mode set switch... and "everything" started working correctly again. These all seemed to be related to this bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-settings/+bug/781445 Which ties into this upstream bug: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33318 What seems to be happening with all these interrelated problems is that If we manually set the parameters that grub should query and pass on... Then things work. If not and set to the defaults of "auto" which spawns some processes to find and pass data to the kernel, then something is broke in those early processes and is passing invalid data. Unfortunatley, this all means that the problem is upstream in that last referred bug. ** Bug watch added: GNU Savannah Bug Tracker #33318 http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?33318 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759103 Title: [STAGING] (Regression) Kernel panic with 2.6.38-8 and acpi on -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
After talking with a lot of people since filing this and seeing that triage was going in the strange directions with this problem... I spent a lot of time doing more homework and research. I spent a lot of time on IRC # grub yesterday talking with a few of their dev's and support's. I followed their advice and... I guess we'll see where this goes: GNU GRUB - Bugs: bug #33318: Unknown process in grub 1.99~rc1 is setting and passing invalid graphics data to linux kernel and Xorg. https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?33318 You should now be able to tie this bug (LP Bug #781445) to that Upstream Bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
I re-read edited): >>Timo Aaltonen wrote 14 hours ago: #4 >> >>If you need to add GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD=text to /etc/default/grub, then it's a >>kernel bug. >> As explained above-- If you manually set the variable of GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD or GFXMODE and it works... then it does not seem to be a kernel bug. Manually setting those variables and passing to the kernel verifies that the process at the kernel is working as designed. What it does point out is that the process is broken before that... Somewhere in GRUB, where it is trying to query the hardware and passing invalid data to set a mode. Manually setting that mode (GFXMODE) bypasses that process. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
Like I said. I don't have this problem on this box or my 4 other's. I do have other 2 test boxs that are currently running Oneiric Ocelot 11.10 that I could pull down to reinstall 11.04 and recreate this problem with various hardware (Intel or AMD CPU's; nvidia, ati or intel video chipsets)... Or just look out on the support forum = there's no shortage of data. As for the comment that HAL is no longer used by the xorg.conf... My xorg.conf says it is. Is it lying to me again? (attached0 Next and included in this issue is the Sandy Bridge chipsets (Dell Alienware) where the y also have NVidia SLI's or ATI Xfire's... The query process is seeing the Sandy Bridge video modes, by not going further the the other chipsets to return their data. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
Adding GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD=text to /etc/default/grub tries to over-ride the variable set gfxpayload=$linux_gfx_mode in 10_linux where GNU says that if set in the/etc/defau;t/grub : ## QUOTE ## GRUB_GFXPAYLOAD_LINUX' Set to `text' to force the Linux kernel to boot in normal text mode, `keep' to preserve the graphics mode set using `GRUB_GFXMODE', `WIDTHxHEIGHT'[`xDEPTH'] to set a particular graphics mode, or a sequence of these separated by commas or semicolons to try several modes in sequence. Depending on your kernel, your distribution, your graphics card, and the phase of the moon, note that using this option may cause GNU/Linux to suffer from various display problems, particularly during the early part of the boot sequence. If you have problems, set this option to `text' and GRUB will tell Linux to boot in normal text mode. ## END QUOTE ## Which later in 10_linux checks $linux_gfx_mode and if set to text tells the kernel not to boot graphics... (translation) This is a "WORKAROUND" telling the kernel not to use the GRUB_GFXMODE to set GFXTERM and not use KMS. This workaround, in essence does the same as 2 other workarounds of rolling back the kernel to 2.6.37.x or to roll back the version of Grub 1.99 to GNU Grub 1.98, in that they both them would ignor the GRUB_GFXMODE call.s All three of these workarounds circumvent around the present process by crippling it or ignoring it. A correct and closer Workaround is to set the parameters of GRUB_GFXMODE and pass them using KMS and the designed process... Which is working as a viable workaround out on the Support Forum. Setting the parameters of the video hardware and monitor manually as a workaround and having it work correctly, tells me the process does work, but it ia apparently s not being set up correctly with the right data. So the real question is: What is the process that VBE is using to query hardware when GRUB_GFXMODE is set auto? HAL? VBEPROBE / VBEINFO? Then we can check what in that process is passing bad parm's or locking up hardware. Whatever this process "IS." this does seem to be where this problem seems to begin. If you leave this as saying that is "the fix." then you are saying that GNU Grub 1.99, the Linux 2.6.38.x series kernel and Xorg X11R7.6 are all broke by not using the process at all. Anyone of these are all upstream, but this all affects Ubuntu (us). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
Got sidetracked,- It causes a few different problems, but shares a common cause: Not being able to find and sett a valid graphics mode. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
@Bugbot- This is not an "nVidia" thing. The happens with nVidia, ATI Radeon, i915, Sandy Bridge, etc. This causes an nVidia chip instlled consurrent with a Sandy Bridge no to be quesried and return it's mode data. Basically, it seems to be causing graphics modes data to be returned in correctly, so that an invalid graphics mode is set. Administratively-- If you would have read ths bug report thoroughly / carefully and the referred question to launchpad about how to report it... I DON'T PERSONALLY HAVE THIS PROBLEM! Which is why I asked all over about how to report this and where to report this, before I did report this, so that ithis problem would not be marked i"invalid." Remember, I've been helping people solve this problem. Instead of having one PC worth of data, I have 100's of PC's worth solved and most share a common problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] Re: Yorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
** Summary changed: - Yorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. + Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781445 Title: Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 781445] [NEW] Xorg's HAL causes Purple screen or Black Screen on GDM startup.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg Refered by: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rhythmbox/+question/157114 Reference: Since implementation of KMS technologies at Ubuntu version 10.04, transitions have occurred where the graphics is first set and how, via: "Kernel mode-setting (KMS) shifts responsibility for selecting and setting up the graphics mode from X.org to the kernel. When X.org is started, it then detects and uses the mode without any further mode changes. This promises to make booting faster, more graphical, and less flickery. " >From what I can figure out, most of this started with 10.04 when they started >implementing KMS technology: (Simplistic explanation of graphical changes) - 9.10 graphics modes were dealt with in xorg and the video drivers. Grub2 introduced. - 10.04 introduces KMS, (kernel mode switching) where graphics modes were set in the kernel and passed to xorg. - 10.10 has some more changes with this... Trying to find and set the graphics modes and pass it to Xorg. - Natty and Grub 1.99 have ingrained changes tied to KMS. Grub tries to find and set the graphics using HAL from Xorg, which it then passes to the kernel, which then passes in it to Xorg. That's why we now have the graphics changes happening as soon as the Grub Menu... Most of the people that I've helped (Ubuntu Support Forum- Installations and Updates) correct their blank screen problems with Natty have been by Bypassing the GFXMODE=auto default setting, a process that starts and uses data returned by HAL. The main fix explicitely sets the GFXMODE=WIDTHxHEIGHTxDEPTH parameters of a mode that "their" graphics hardware supports. This fix bypasses "HAL" and it's query/mode set functions. Other fixes are via setting the scan rate of a monitor, which is also sopposed to be a a function of HAL. (ETC.) That first fix applies setting the "3" common parameters of GFXMODE. That third parameter is buried in the documentation I did find from GNU and Xorg... There have been a few other "instances" where there was some other things going on or the "current" kernel "did not support or lost" graphics support for... (The kernel in proposed fixes a lot of those) But the majority was just setting an initial mode. I have asked around and no-one wants to really point fingers, but this is a problem. No one wants talk about this "new" relationships between grub, the kernel and xorg to supply needed info that may come up with other work-arounds. I've asked in many places at Ubuntu and Conical (where I thought I could get some answers) about any kind of documentations... but all have been ignored. I know that kernel boot parameters are a part of it. I know that Grub 1.99's GFXMODE and GFXTERM are a part of it. I know thiat HAL and subsequently Xorg is a part of this. What I put together so far is in this sticky, which is still evolving: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1743535 I know that the default of GFXMODE=auto is causing a lot of blank screens as it tries modes until it lands on one that deos not return an error code... even though that instance may be invalid or out-of-range. On some people I've helped with this, rolling back the kerenl to 2.6.37.x makes their problems disappear. You say rolling the Grub version back to 1.98 works. I'm thinking that "maybe" those 2 items might be doing the same thing by not passing an invalid mode or parameter. Could it? Along those line, the same fixes "happen" if they install the propose kernel 2.6.38.9 in the proposed repo or the 2.6.39.0 in the mainline. Which those might have fixed ported in for the bugs that have been filed on this(?) In Natty Norwhahl 11.04, HAL affects Xorg and the xorg.conf: "# commented out by update-manager, HAL is now used and auto-detects devices" Querying video hardware usinf xrandr: "hal.1: read hal dataprocess 2951: arguments to dbus_move_error() were incorrect, assertion "(dest) == NULL || !dbus_error_is_set ((dest))" failed in file dbus-errors.c line 280. This is normally a bug in some application using the D-Bus library. libhal.c 3483 : Error unsubscribing to signals, error=The name org.freedesktop.Hal was not provided by any .service files" HAL problems now seem to affect GNU Grub 1.99, Linux kernel and Xorg. This really affect this new distribution of Ubuntu (11.04) which heavily relies on this and is cauaing many problems. It no only affects the Xsession startup, but also it's shutdown. Summary: Normal users should not have to be highly skilled "techies" to manually bypass a broken part of a system to make a released distribution work during an install or distribution upgrade! ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: xorg 1:7.6+4ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-8.42-generic 2.6.38.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-8-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia .proc.driver.nvidia.gpus.0: Error: [Errno 21] Is a directory: '/proc/driver/nvidia/gpus/0' .proc.driver.nvidia.registry: Binary:
[Bug 772207] Re: version 173.14.30 is buggy for GeForce FX 5200
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 762478 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/762478 Wait a minute... This crossrference here says to be in error: Remember: This is a duplicate of Bug 762478 ( https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/762478) How is this Bug a duplicate of "[nouveau] No icons shown in unity launcher", which is a compiz problem right? Nothing there seems to reference this graphics driver being installed but not being used. Rather, Is this Bug a duplicate of another Not-yet-referenced BUG? Just curious. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/772207 Title: version 173.14.30 is buggy for GeForce FX 5200 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756267] Re: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND, , menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight
Sorry-- grub-common, 1,99~rc1-10ubuntu1 grub0pc, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267 Title: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,, menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756267] Re: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND, , menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight
grub-common, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu grub-pc, 1.99~rc1-10ubuntu grub2-splashimages, 1.0.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267 Title: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,, menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756267] Re: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND, , menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight
To recreate, I used the " sudo apt-get install grub2-splashimages " to install images that were previously known as comaptible with Grub2 backgrounds. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267 Title: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,, menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 756267] [NEW] grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND, , menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub-coreboot The current grub theme package and these release candidate grub packages now has problems with each other. Things that worked previously for grub theming should work but are now broke. GRUB_BACKGROUND= with the installed grub theming package images should display but the setting of menu_color_normal=white/black should render the second color (background) color) black as transparent. Ref: Ubuntu Server 11.04beta1, GNU Grub2 1.99~rc1 What happens is that on most of the pictures in that package, the pcture is in the background with a black menu background = not transparent... If you og through the rest of the pictures, there are a few pictures where black will come up as transparent. Further, once you do find a baskground image that works, then the text and highlight options then change to light-gray text on transparent for menu_color_normal and black text on light-gray for menu_color_highlight - no matter what rgb colr you set these variables to. I started a thread in the dev natty forum- seems to be a problem with more than I on same. We have not found any work-arounds on this yet. There are upstream changes in GNU Grub 1.99~rc1 on theming and their change logs show work on theming as late as 2011.04.01. There was Ubuntu repository updates to these packages today, but they did not change these problems. Upstream changes on this in their release canidate manual show that the above "should" work and that are additional changes are in the gfx_term building and display of custom theming menu enhancements. I'm assuming this is a work-in-progress on upstream changes of GNU's release candidate... which affects Ubuntu's packages in their repo's, but I think you might want to track it. ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 11.14beta1 gnu grub2 ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756267 Title: grub2 1.99~rc1 theming problems with GRUB_BACKGROUND,, menu_color_normal, menu_color_higlight -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755771] Re: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly
Okay-- It must not be assumed any longer. marked this solved. (a non- problem) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755771 Title: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755771] Re: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly
The sys logs "journal" right? Why don't I just do "each" and upload the journals of the sys logs? On -H... I never did that before this. "sudo shutdown 1" always brought it down cleanly to a powerdown in 10.10 without any other flag. Maybe in that version, it was assumed? (and this just a change) Will try -p and see how that goes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755771 Title: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755771] Re: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly
Does not boot into the grub menu... Boot into the linux recsue text menu --Light blue background, blue box, red menu items... with options such as drop down to root commandline... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755771 Title: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 755771] [NEW] Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly
Public bug reported: Ubuntu Server 11.04beta1 32bit. Was clean install on box that successfully ran Server 10.10 32bit with the same packages. "sudo shutdown 0" starts shutdown seqeunce, reboots into linux rescue mode menu where it keeps looping into itself. "sudo shutdown 0 -r" goes through shutdown and reboot normally. "sudo shutdown 0 -H" goes through shutdown sequence successfully, but locks-up box with "system halt" as the last line on the monitor-- does not power down/with the ATX powerswitch locked out/inoperational. However- xubuntu-desktop is installed and if I start the gdm and choose shutdown from the gui... It powersdown cleanly. I have done dumps and submitted to launchpad before, but I am lost on what to submit for something that exists when a system is in the process of (trying) to shutdown(!) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: 11.04 32bit beta1 natty pae server ** Tags added: 11.04 32bit beta1 natty pae server -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/755771 Title: Natty Server 11.04beta1 does not shutdown or poweroff cleanly -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
Update/Observation -- I know you all have bounced this around pointing fingers here and there (Samba group, server group, Rhythmbox group... etc) I think as last (as I remember) you had changed it from samba to server... Well here's a wrench to throw at that logic --> I just set uo one of my spares here with Ubuntu 10.10 Server Edition with LAMP, Samba, SSH, Tomcat, EUC frontend, etc, ... Comfigured all including smb shares. Installed 3 GUI shells (ubuntu-desktop, kubuntu-desktop, xubuntu-desktop) as well as editing grub2 to easily come into it's native text console... I configured Rythymbox on it the get its music from a mounted Windows share (on another server) AND GUESS WHAT??? Differences in desktup and server kerne Rhythembox and all the extansion (including the Ubuntu Music Store runs perfectly!!! The machine I am having problems on is running LAMP and Samba services. The only obvios differnce on the machine that works from the one that I am having the problems on is the machine machine that is working is running the "server kernel"... >From the server guide, the differences betweeen the server and desktop kernel >are: - :The Server Edition uses the Deadline I/O scheduler instead of the CFQ scheduler used by the Desktop Edition. - Preemption is turned off in the Server Edition. - The timer interrupt is 100 Hz in the Server Edition and 250 Hz in the Desktop Edition.: I don't know, but it's working on this machine and not my other that is running server services on the desktop kernel. SO... might some of the config options that are different between /boot/config-2.35.xx-general and /boot/config-2.35.xx-server be doing this? If so, seems that it might not be a server issue, but rather how the desktop kernel is configured. (Just an mystery tio me.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
Changes in the updates for samba 2.3.5.4 had no affect on my problems (these bugs) // They were the same and still present. I took wins back out of nsswitch.conf and they were all gone again. I was optimistic, but my hopes were soon crushed... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
Okay-- Ubuntu updates tonight that include samba_3.5.4... to include changes in "winbind." I don't know yet if any of these new updates will affect these bugs (my fingers fingers are crossed), but will check on mine once they finish downloading and installing. Will report back soon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
Sorry the bug at end of comment #35 should have been bug #7027730 (no edit function here). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 529714] Re: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r()
My bug (#7027730) has been ID'ed as a diplicate of this bug... even though it effects a lot more on mine than just what I see in this bug-> Ubuntu One Music Store puggin cannot be loaded at all or Rhythembox will not start; Ubuntu's Last.fm, Jamendo and Magnatude pluggins crash Rhythembox if I try to play anything from them; No playback of any Audio CD and ripping Audio CD's... Yes that's right, if I insert an Audio CD into my CD/DVD drive Rhtyboxbox Crashes and cannot startup until the CD is taken out of the drive. MY sys is 10.10 and as a test they had me load Ubuntu's newest release of Rhytmbox (yet even though it was an Ubuntu build, it is not yet supported by them formally) and that didn't change any of it at all. As a work-around in comment #26, that person said that it will stop if you remove the Ubuntu One Music Store pluggin... not wholly true, at least not for mine. Mine will not even start up with that pluggin installed, but my other problems still are present when that pluggin is uninstalled. My other problems seem to be additional to these bugs- but do "also" disappear if I remove "wins" from the hosts line of /etc/nsswitche.conf... so it seems they "are" related to a problem in Samba. One other problem was that apport wasn't catching any of my crashes, so I had to do manual traces. If anyone taking care of this bug needs traces, see the files attached to bug #7020030. They seem to be related and may help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Title: rhythmbox crashed with SIGSEGV in _nss_wins_gethostbyname_r() -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 702730] Re: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Omer-- Ah... No. Bug 529714 is on the Ubuntu One Music Store plugin. This PC, even though it "is" having problems there, presently does not have it installed-- and has other problems. I knew that "that" pluggin was a know problem, so I tried to be careful that "these" problems were ID'ed as "other problems," which they are. So... Someone just mis-ID'ed my bug as a dup of 529714, which it is not. Currently, I do not have the Ubuntu One music Store pluggin installed // Rhythmbox will not start on this PC with it installed. It does have the other Ubuntu pluggins installed (lastfm, etc.) which (personally. I really don't care if those ever work. (Although. I do like the Ubuntu One Music Store...) The chief complaint, the main issue here in "this bug" is that Rhythmbox is "crashing when you insert an audio CD into the CD/DVD drive." This means that Rhytmbox, a linux music player cannot play music from audio cd's, nor rip music from the user's cd's,, which is supposed to be the main function of the player. Right? As a side, these other pluggins are not working... and apport is not catching the crashes to report them... so I'm having to do manual traces. I will... as this PC does have this other bug's problems also... do these other workarounds (this afternoon) and see if it affects "the additional" problems" in this bug. If you can "now" see that the problems in this bug "is not the same" and is additional to-- I would appreciate that the status of this bug be changed back from and not ID'ed as a Duplicate to a "different" problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702730 Title: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 702730] Re: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Got it... f bug #529714. Checking out now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702730 Title: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 702730] Re: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529714 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529714 Reference Comment #9: Omer (sorry about mispelling your name previously), All these trace were done with Ubuntu One Music Store "uninstalled." It won't even start with it installed on this PC. Regerence Comment #10: ??? Okay, this makes sense that it might be this. There was a time when Samba went through many iterations when there was a problem sharing files with another Windows PV on the network... But-- > >> see comment #10 and 11 in the duplicate bug and see if the workaround >> works for you. > Do you have a link for this "Dup"that you are referenvcing so I can check it out? Should I upload my Smaba Pref file or anything else? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/702730 Title: crashes on cd playback and on pluggins -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
