Re: [Bug 30594] Re: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend
NFS auto-unmounting upon suspend is still important to me. I'm on 12.04 (which is still a supported release, of course). On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Serge Hallyn 30...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: Please reply if this is still an issue in a supported release. ** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30594 Title: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/30594/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to pm-utils in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30594 Title: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/30594/+subscriptions -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 30594] Re: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend
NFS auto-unmounting upon suspend is still important to me. I'm on 12.04 (which is still a supported release, of course). On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Serge Hallyn 30...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote: Please reply if this is still an issue in a supported release. ** Changed in: pm-utils (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30594 Title: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/30594/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30594 Title: Unmount NFS filesystems before stopping network during suspend To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm-utils/+bug/30594/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 160264] Re: [nvidia] compiz displays white screen when locked
Hi. It is not an issue for me anymore because I'm using a different computer with ATI graphics now. I'm using Kubuntu 12.04. I don't have any issues (especially now that I have firefox-kde-support, which is unrelated, of course) :-) On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Thomas Hotz thomas.h...@gmail.com wrote: Is this still an issue for you? What Ubuntu version do you use? Thank you for telling us! ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a duplicate bug report (234824). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160264 Title: [nvidia] compiz displays white screen when locked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell/+bug/160264/+subscriptions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/160264 Title: [nvidia] compiz displays white screen when locked To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/dell/+bug/160264/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 954337] [NEW] rekonq does not know how to handle this protocol: blank
Public bug reported: This affects me with Kubuntu 12.04 beta 1 64bit installed via Alternate installer. Use Rekonq to download and save a file. I tested with some JPEGs and tar.bz2 files. After downloading, go to Downloads in Rekonq Choose Open Directory for a downloaded item. Expected result: Dolphin will open to the directory of the downloaded item. Actual result: Error dialog with message: rekonq does not know how to handle this protocol: Nothing follows the protocol. The same error happens when trying to Open file for the downloaded it. Dolphin does have the correct applications associated with files, so this issue just affects the browser. (Firefox also has the same issue, but no other applications appear to be affected.) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954337 Title: rekonq does not know how to handle this protocol: blank To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/954337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 953700] [NEW] Kubuntu 12.04 Firefox and Rekong don't know how to open downloaded files
Public bug reported: I just installed Kubuntu 12.04 beta 1. Both Rekong and Firefox don't know how to Open Containing Folder for downloaded items. They also don't know how open the item itself. Furthermore, if I manually tell Firefox (in the dialog) to remember the file associations, that creates a new problem. Every file opens in Dolphin first, then Dolphin opens the correct application. Here are the steps to reproduce this. 1. boot up into a Live CD. 2. change software sources to enable downloading packages 3. install Firefox using the menu item under Main Menu Internet Firefox installer 4. open Firefox after it finishes installing 5. download and save any file. I tested with a PDF. 6. open the downloads dialog (Firefox Tools Downloads) 7. right click the downloaded item and choose Open Containing Folder. [8. for many file types, attempting to open the item from this Downloads dialogs, such as opening JPEG, will produce the same issue.] Expected result: Firefox should know to open the folder in Dolphin. It should also know how to open various types of content with the correct application (i.e., using mime types). Actual results: Firefox does not know how to open the folder. Dolphin is not even suggested as a default option. Firefox also doesn't know how to open most file types. Rekonq has the same (or similar) problems. This issue is present in both an installed system (64 bit via Alt installer) as well as a Live environment from the DVD. Possibly relevant: In Firefox preferences Applications, the only content types shown are irc, ircs, mailto, podcast, tar file, webca and webfeed. Normally, there would be many more. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953700 Title: Kubuntu 12.04 Firefox and Rekong don't know how to open downloaded files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/953700/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 760131] Re: Power consumption raised significantly in natty
I hope this is an appropriate question here: Can someone explain this comment? Leann Ogasawara on 2011-04-25 Changed in ubuntu-release-notes: status:In Progress → Fix Released The status says fix released, yet it doesn't appear to be fixed. Does that mean the fix is coming or does it mean the fix didn't really fix it? Thanks for any reply. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/760131 Title: Power consumption raised significantly in natty -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 768353] Re: Suspend and Resume Power Management Lock Settings Cause System Lockup
log attached ** Attachment added: output from ubuntu-bug linux --save https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/768353/+attachment/2081265/+files/ubuntu-bug-output-768346.1.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/768353 Title: Suspend and Resume Power Management Lock Settings Cause System Lockup -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 374320] Re: Gnome System Log Complains About btmp log permissions
This bug affects me too. 2.6.35-28-generic #49-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 1 14:39:03 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.10 DISTRIB_CODENAME=maverick DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION=Ubuntu 10.10 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/374320 Title: Gnome System Log Complains About btmp log permissions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 274396] Re: Installer stops, asks for media in mid process
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 270461 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461 Here's a work-around: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13 I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/274396 Title: Installer stops, asks for media in mid process -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 316618] Re: jaunty alternate cd media change error
Probably related, and could be a work-around for those having this issue: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/316618 Title: jaunty alternate cd media change error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 289702] Re: Installer can't proceed after asking for media change
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 270461 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461 Here's a work-around: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13 I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289702 Title: Installer can't proceed after asking for media change -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270461] Re: Alpha-5 alternate installer fails
Here's a work-around: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13 I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461 Title: Alpha-5 alternate installer fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 270461] Re: Alpha-5 alternate installer fails
Here's another work-around: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=10420985postcount=13 I also think this could be the basis for a real fix by the Ubuntu team. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/270461 Title: Alpha-5 alternate installer fails -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils
I'm running 10.10 and it fails to suspend to RAM if I have used any NFS shares. Even if no files are currently open, if some files on a share were previously opened during the current session, Ubuntu will fail to suspend. If I log out and log back in, I can suspend if I do so before beginning any work that involves a share. I tried the script in comment #1. It didn't resolve the issue. I simply placed it in the location mentioned (/etc/pm/sleep.d/80_autofs) and made it executable and tried to suspend. Is more required to make it work? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 Title: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 292698] Re: upgrade to intrepid broke hibernate/suspend (2 tasks refusing to freeze) (nfs related?)
I'm running 10.10 and it fails to suspend to RAM if I have used any NFS shares. This happens 100% of the time and is easily reproducible. (I'm using NFS 3.) Even if no files are currently open, if some files on a share were previously opened during the current session, Ubuntu will fail to suspend. If I log out of the desktop and log back in, I can suspend if I do so before beginning any work that involves a share. This also produces the stated outcome 100% of the time. I tried the solution in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pm- utils/+bug/506116. It didn't resolve the issue for me. Here is a typical log. Clearly, this is NFS related. Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157643.665593] Freezing user space processes ... Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667670] gnome-panel D 0082 0 8620 8542 0x0084 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667673] 8803ec591b68 0082 8803ec591ae8 00015980 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667675] 8803ec591fd8 00015980 8803ec591fd8 88040d42c4a0 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667678] 00015980 00015980 8803ec591fd8 00015980 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667680] Call Trace: Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667691] [a0e0] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0x40 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667697] [a0bbbc04] rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x24/0x40 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667701] [815884ff] __wait_on_bit+0x5f/0x90 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667706] [a0e0] ? rpc_wait_bit_killable+0x0/0x40 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667708] [815885a8] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x78/0x90 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667711] [8107f770] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x40 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667717] [a0bbc4ed] __rpc_execute+0xed/0x290 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667722] [a0bbc713] rpc_execute+0x83/0xa0 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667727] [a0bb4c99] rpc_run_task+0x29/0x40 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667731] [a0bb4db2] rpc_call_sync+0x42/0x70 [sunrpc] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667734] [8116ec90] ? mntput_no_expire+0x30/0x110 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667742] [a0cf6645] T.1034+0x35/0x80 [nfs] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667749] [a0cf7367] nfs3_proc_getattr+0x47/0x90 [nfs] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667754] [a0ce6a30] __nfs_revalidate_inode+0xd0/0x210 [nfs] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667759] [a0ce6ce6] nfs_revalidate_inode+0x36/0x60 [nfs] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667764] [a0ce6dc6] nfs_getattr+0x66/0x120 [nfs] Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667767] [81157531] vfs_getattr+0x51/0x80 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667769] [811575c0] vfs_fstatat+0x60/0x80 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667771] [8115764e] vfs_lstat+0x1e/0x20 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667773] [81157674] sys_newlstat+0x24/0x50 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667776] [8158db2e] ? do_page_fault+0x15e/0x350 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667778] [8158a675] ? page_fault+0x25/0x30 Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667781] [8100a0f2] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Jan 6 02:11:19 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667795] Jan 6 02:11:20 MyComputer kernel: [157663.667795] Restarting tasks ... done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/292698 Title: upgrade to intrepid broke hibernate/suspend (2 tasks refusing to freeze) (nfs related?) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils
I mount my NFS shares via /etc/fstab using entries such as: 10.10.1.1:/home/shared /home/shared nfs auto,rw,noatime 0 0 Is the auto option used there the same as (or related to) the autofs mentioned in this bug report? I had assumed so, but now I realize I might be wrong because when I run ./autofs suspend the response is: autofs: command not found (Sorry if I have posted to the wrong bug report.) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 Title: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 506116] Re: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils
Wizzu, thank you. As a next step I will try autofs with your script. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506116 Title: autofs suspend/hibernate script should be ported from apmd system to pm-utils -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
I have the same problem in Maverick -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to openssh in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 201786] Re: ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines
I have the same problem in Maverick -- ssh Agent admitted failure to sign using the key on big endian machines https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/201786 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 597070] Re: Imac Radeon HD 4850 switch Mini Display Port output during install resulting black screen
This issue is affecting me too. I verified that this is the exact behavior I'm seeing with my iMac 11,1. This issue does not affect all model iMacs. Mine is a 27 late 2009 model. Here is how to check the serial number to determine the model. On the bottom of your iMac stand, you'll find a label with the serial number printed on it, or from the Apple menu, choose About This Mac. Configure To Order (CTO) models are designated with an asterisk (*). Check the last three characters on the serial number: iMac (Mid 2010) DAS, DNM* iMac (21.5-inch, Mid 2010) DB7, DNN* iMac (21.5-inch, Mid 2010) DB6, DNP* iMac (27-inch, Mid 2010) DB5, DNR* iMac (27-inch, Mid 2010) iMac (Late 2009) 5PC, B9U, CY8* iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2009) 5PK*, B9S* iMac (21.5-inch, Late 2009) 5PE, 5PJ, CYB* iMac (27-inch, Late 2009) CYC*, 5PM*, 5RU* iMac (27-inch, Late 2009) -- Imac Radeon HD 4850 switch Mini Display Port output during install resulting black screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597070 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 542660] Re: New Apple iMac (Core i5) fails to display anything
I tested Ubuntu 10.10 daily build as of 2010.09.19 and I still get the blank screen. (I don't have an adapter to plug in a second screen as artik suggested above.) -- New Apple iMac (Core i5) fails to display anything https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555571] Re: Network Management disabled
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524454 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524454 My experience is exactly the same as comment 18 I quote: I had this same issue after a reboot. Ganton's post/link fixed it. I restarted my laptop because it could not be resumed: only a black screen with the shell cursor is shown on the top left. Network-manager-kde systray says that network management disabled This fixed my problem: service network-manager stop rm /var/lib/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.state service network-manager start -- Network Management disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 555571] Re: Network Management disabled
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 524454 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524454 When I posted my comment, I got a message that said, Remember, this bug report is a duplicate of bug #524454. Comment here only if you think the duplicate status is wrong. So I read bug #524454. That bug does not describe my problem. This bug describes my exact problem as well as the resolution. So these do not appear to be duplicates (to me). -- Network Management disabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 326043] Re: Font size optimisation misbehaving
FYI, I'm running openSUSE on my laptop now, so I won't be testing the latest release of Ubuntu right now. (I hope to come back to Ubuntu when KDE support is improved to match openSUSE.) I guess you can close out this bug. Thanks. On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Jeremy Foshee jeremy.fos...@canonical.comwrote: Hi MountainX, This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the latest development release of Ubuntu? ISO CD images are available from http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/lucid. If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal (Applications-Accessories-Terminal). It will automatically gather and attach updated debug information to this report. apport-collect -p linux 326043 Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be great. It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue. Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds . Once you've tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream- testing' tag. This can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the 'needs-upstream-testing' text. Please let us know your results. Thanks in advance. [This is an automated message. Apologies if it has reached you inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.] ** Tags added: needs-kernel-logs ** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing ** Tags added: kj-triage ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Font size optimisation misbehaving https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326043 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- Font size optimisation misbehaving https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 335664] Re: Can't purchase support contract through Canonical Store
FYI, I went to the store today to look at purchasing server support and the problem I reported last year still exists. -- Can't purchase support contract through Canonical Store https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335664 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
There is thousands of bugs opened every months and limited ressources to work on those and smbfs is a power user thing and not something most users will experience with when using ubuntu See comment #108: Don't you want Ubuntu to integrate smoothly into a Windows-centric environment? See Bug #1. -- gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
Regarding comment #61, this is working great! But my package manager keeps asking me to upgrade wine and wine gecko. How do I prevent this? Thanks. -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
I solved the question I asked in comment #63. I just opened Synaptic package manager, found wine, and then used the Package menu to lock the package. I ran the update tool and it no longer asked me to upgrade wine. -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] Re: Install Fails - Jaunty beta
My solution was to make a USB installer: http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7255204postcount=18 -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] Re: Install Fails - Jaunty beta
Lundin, how similar is your hardware to mine? I have an Asus A8N5X motherboard. -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] Re: Install Fails - Jaunty beta
I agree - it is probably not a coincidence that our motherboards so are similar. They both use the nvidia nforce chip set and have other similarities (such as same CPU socket). I presume this error only happens on certain hardware. Now that we have two examples of this error, maybe someone will get interested. Or maybe (hopefully) someone will tell us if this is mostly likely an Ubuntu bug or an Asus bug. -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
Tyler - Thanks!!! That works. http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=7963718postcount=13 I installed ies4linux and MS Money 2003 Deluxe and Business as before and now the 100% CPU utilization bug is fixed. Online banking works. :) Now there is just one more bug to fix: get rid of my dependence on MS Money and move to GnuCash. :) -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
I see the 100% CPU usage from wineserver on Ubuntu 9.04 amd64 with both wine 1.0.1 and wine 1.1.29. I have also reproduced it with ies4linux 2.99.0 and 2.99.0.1. I can reproduce this when running ie6 under wine directly. However, the more troubling problem is that it happens when running Microsoft Money 2003 under wine every time the online banking function is used. (If Money is run but no online banking is done, the bug does not happen. It only happens after encypted internet communication by Money.) In this scenario, the ie6 script mentioned in Comment #7 From Ter Rymon (http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13687) is not ever called, so I don't see how that could be the explanation. The 100% CPU utilization by wineserver apparently occurs after encypted internet communication by _components_ of ie6, even without the web browser itself ever being opened. I also see this on ALL websites that use HTTPS when accessed via ie6. In comment #51 above by Julian Robbins, removing | debug is mentioned. My script is two instances of | debugPipe, which is different. I removed them anyway and it did not resolve the issue. -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
I did a clean install of wine 1.1.29 and this time I did not use ies4linux. I used winetricks to install ie6. However, I cannot get MS Money 2003 to work because of missing encryption components. At the moment I'm not geting 100% CPU load, but I'm also not able to connect to online banking so I cannot say what will happen if I get online banking to work. The 100% CPU load may come back. -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 205895] Re: [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage
aeromojito, I'm running amd64. The fix from Tyler Wagner won't work on 64 bit. -- [Hardy] Wine 100% cpu usage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205895 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327327] Re: Can't open multiple large PDF files
So far, so good. I just opened 12 relatively large PDF files and I did not experience the problem. Please allow me to test for the next couple weeks and if the problem doesn't appear, then we can close this issue. -- Can't open multiple large PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327327] Re: Can't open multiple large PDF files
Thanks for following up. I have just managed to get Jaunty installed. It was by far the most challenging Ubuntu installation ever for me. But I have it running now, so I will test this and report back... (I may need to take a rest from the computer for a day or so after this intense process of trouble shooting my installation problems for nearly a month!) -- Can't open multiple large PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328127] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
The steps Pedro Pedruzzi describes (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome- keyring/+bug/328127/comments/29) are identical to the steps that originally produced the bug for me. (However, I did not go as far as he did to reproduce it again after rebooting.) -- gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328127] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
Oh, I should have checked this before posting my last comment. myu...@myserver:~$ echo $SSH_AUTH_SOCK myu...@myserver:~$ Maybe that's why I'm not having a problem any more? (for context, see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-keyring/+bug/328127/comments/23 where I mention that setting of SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 eliminates the error for me) -- gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328127] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
After I rebooted, I have never seen the problem again. I'm not sure why it was transient in my case. And I didn't do anything (afaik) to resolve it, but it is gone. -- gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 328127] Re: gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key.
I have the problem on a brand new Jaunty AMD64 install. As Johnathon wrote, I can reproduce the error and also can use the setting of SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 to temporarily bypass it. To reproduce, I open a terminal and type ssh myu...@myserver. I do this command many times per day to different servers (all passwordless) and I never had this issue until I installed Jaunty today. Responses (the best I can do): * If gnome-keyring-daemon is crashing, I need a backtrace. I'm running ssh in a terminal. * If there's lines in /var/log/auth.log or ~/.xsession-errors I need those. I do not see any relevant messages in these files. * Or I need a key that I can use to duplicate the problem. I will make a new key (that I can attach) and try to reproduce the steps after I unset SSH_AUTH_SOCK=0 (once I figure out how to do that...) -- gnome-keyring-daemon returns Agent admitted failure to sign using the key. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328127 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] Re: Install Fails - Jaunty beta
I get the same error with the Jaunty release. ** Attachment added: jaunty_failed_install_syslog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26186779/jaunty_failed_install_syslog.txt -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 225361] Re: other users don't have access to .gvfs
FROM http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=791693highlight=.gvfspage=2 This is the official solution: sudo aptitude reinstall gvfs gvfs-backends gvfs-bin gvfs-fuse libgvfscommon0 Is that true? -- other users don't have access to .gvfs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225361 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327327] Re: Can't open multiple large PDF files
I will be upgrading to Jaunty after the release. I'll try it then. -- Can't open multiple large PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 353535] Re: Kernel update of Jaunty beta failed
Maybe this is the same issue as my problem: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7063842#post7063842 I purchased a new hard drive for my laptop and did a clean install of Jaunty beta (amd64, alternate installer). The install went fine -- better than any Ubuntu installation ever. After the install I was greeted by the proprietary driver notifier, and I told it to use the recommended nVidia properitary driver. After that installation succeeded, I restarted. Then I used update manager to install the available updates. However, that failed with the following message. E: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 E: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-image-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-restricted-modules-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- Kernel update of Jaunty beta failed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/353535 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350604] Re: package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17
Maybe this is the same issue as my problem: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=7063842#post7063842 I purchased a new hard drive for my laptop and did a clean install of Jaunty beta (amd64, alternate installer). The install went fine -- better than any Ubuntu installation ever. After the install I was greeted by the proprietary driver notifier, and I told it to use the recommended nVidia properitary driver. After that installation succeeded, I restarted. Then I used update manager to install the available updates. However, that failed with the following message. E: linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 E: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.28-11-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-image-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-restricted-modules-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured E: linux-generic: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured -- package linux-image-2.6.28-11-generic 2.6.28-11.38 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 17 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350604 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] Re: Install Fails - Jaunty beta
You can extract it by going back to the main menu and selecting save debug logs. It is not possible to navigate in the installer when this error happens. The installer presents two choices: go back or continue. Neither choice will move away from the screen showing the error. The only way I have found to get out of the installer is to reboot. What else can you suggest? (I can get to the other terminal windows such as Alt-F2, Alt-F3, etc.) -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351750] [NEW] Install Fails - Jaunty beta
Public bug reported: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6983082#post6983082 I have tried to install 6 times without success. 1. I have burned two CDs and they both validate as good. 2. Both CDs stop at exactly the same point in the installation on this computer. See info below. 3. Using the same installation CD in another computer works, so it is not an issue with the CD. Conclusion: there is a bug in Jaunty (the installer) that shows up on this hardware. The install fails at the same point every time. When I switch to the Alt-F4 terminal, here is what I see: preseed: locale: cannot set LC_ALL to default locale. no such file or folder... in-target: reading package lists... in-target: the following NEW packages will be installed Please insert the disk [Jaunty...] in drive /cdrom/ I can open another terminal (Alt-F2) and cd to, and ls the cdrom, so the CD disk is visible and it can be read from. I'm using the beta alternate installer amd64 on a computer that is currently running Hardy. I'm installing fresh to a different partition (one that used to hold Windows). Let me know what hardware reports are required. ** Affects: base-installer (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Install Fails - Jaunty beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351750 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307885] Re: Please update to storeBackup 2.0 in jaunty
Release Candidate 2 for StoreBackup Version 3.0 is available as of Tue 03 Mar 2009 09:53:15 PM UTC. Is it too late for Jaunty? -- Please update to storeBackup 2.0 in jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307885 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287879] Re: cryptsetup does not understand UUID= in fstab and conf.d/resume
Hi - I am trying to determine if this issue applies to me. Is this the right place to ask some questions? (newbie) My system: $ uname -a: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic #1 SMP x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dpkg -s cryptsetup Package: cryptsetup Status: install ok installed Architecture: amd64 Version: 2:1.0.6-6ubuntu2.2 I'm guessing I either need the patch or a backport. If I need to use the patch, how would I do so? I just installed Ubuntu on this server. I have not had problems from package updates yet. I'm guessing I will if I don't use the patch... At the moment, I am using /dev/disk/by-uuid/ in both fstab and crypttab. It is working. However, I would like to switch all volume references to labels. Will that present any problems? Thanks. -- cryptsetup does not understand UUID= in fstab and conf.d/resume https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287879 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119233] Re: hard drive mount letters changed AGAIN
I think I might be experiencing problems from this issue http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=6802296postcount=14 the Ubuntu installer think my drive is hd0, the live CD shows it as hd4 (sde) and grub sees it as hd1. Is this the same issue described here? Thanks -- hard drive mount letters changed AGAIN https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 40075] Re: SCSI driver for arcmsr not added to initrd
This exact problem is happening to me with 8.10 64bit and an Areca 1220. I have reinstalled about a dozen times. If I put the /boot partition on a drive on the Areca controller, Ubuntu will not boot. If I put the boot partition on another drive, no problem. I would like to know why I am still seeing this problem in 8.10 if it has been resolved. How might we find out if my problem is exactly the same one? Thanks. -- SCSI driver for arcmsr not added to initrd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/40075 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207960] Re: [CAPSLOCK] Swap Ctrl and Capslock - capslock key continues to trigger capslock LED
Bryce, thank for your reply. Due to having so many problems with keyboard layout (especially in remote desktop to Windows servers), my solution is going to be a different keyboard (maybe http://pckeyboards.stores.yahoo.net/linux101.html). -- [CAPSLOCK] Swap Ctrl and Capslock - capslock key continues to trigger capslock LED https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327327] Re: Can't open multiple large PDF files
Thank you for your interest in this bug. Are you sure you want me to attach 8 to 10 large PDF documents here? In my experience it does not matter which PDF documents I open. After a certain number of large documents are open, Evince refuses to open any more, even if I have plenty of system memory left. -- Can't open multiple large PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 327327] [NEW] Can't open multiple large PDF files
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evince When I try to open multiple PDF documents in Evince Document Viewer (the default app), after several documents are open, Evince fails to load the next one. This always happens, but the hang point (number of docs) depends on the size of the docs. Here are the steps I used to produce the bug just now: 1. check system monitor memory. It shows 1.2 GiB used of 3.0 GiB (and no swap memory used out of 3.4 GiB). 2. Open 5 PDF documents. No problems. 3. Open the 6th PDF. It fails to load. No error is shown, but Evince just shows me a blank window. 4. check system monitor again. It shows 1.4 GiB used of 3.0 GiB (and still no swap memory used out of 3.4 GiB). 5. if I close a previously opened PDF document, I can open the 6th one that would not open before. So it is not a problem with a specific PDF document. It appears to be a problem with how many large documents I have open. The PDF files in this test were more than 1 MB each (and largest was 11 MB). I repeated the test with smaller PDF documents (all under 200k) and I was able to open 8 without problems and I probably could have opened more. But eventually, Evince will hang as described above. I know this from past experience. Any ideas about how to troubleshoot this? I'm running Hardy 32 bit. Computer specs: Asus A8N5X, Athlon 64X2 3800+, 4GB CORSAIR XMS DDR500 RAM, GeForce 8600GT 256MB GDDR3 PCIe x16 SLI (forum thread http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=6705617#post6705617) ___ ** Affects: evince (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Can't open multiple large PDF files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/327327 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 326043] [NEW] Font size optimisation misbehaving
Public bug reported: I upgraded to Ubuntu 9.04 on my T61p thinkpad. Afterwards the screen fonts were all huge, making the appearance of Ubuntu (all menus and all applications, including text in documents) very ugly and not user friendly. I found that the problem was related to a setting of 146 dots per inch resolution in Appearance Fonts Details Resolution. Changing this back to 96 dpi resolved the issue. I see that Font size optimisation is advertised as a new feature of 9.04. Font dot-per-inch settings are now optimised based on the monitor’s capabilities, rather than defaulting to 96dpi. Apparently this new feature isn't working as intended. My hardware: ThinkPad T61p 6459CTO Core2Due, 15.4 WUXGA TFT, NVIDIA FX570M, 4GB Geil RAM, 120 GB HDD (I have no idea which package this is related to.) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Font size optimisation misbehaving https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326043 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Pardon me for asking my question a second time. I appreciate anyone pointing me to a source of info that will tell me which hardware is NOT subject to this bug. I'm willing to change hardware to keep Ubuntu. My problem sounds identical to Andy Rabagliati's. For example, I see endlessly repeating messages like this: [ 19.080009] usb 5-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [ 19.336509] usb 5-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [ 19.592009] usb 5-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [ 19.840009] usb 5-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [ 20.088009] usb 5-3: reset high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 Which chipsets are safe to use with Ubuntu to avoid this problem? Thanks. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
Thanks CrazyTerabyte and Andy Rabagliati. What does lsusb say ? lsusb Bus 001 Device 005: ID 0aec:3260 Neodio Technologies Corp. 7-in-1 Card Reader Bus 001 Device 004: ID 0b33:0700 Contour Design, Inc. Bus 001 Device 003: ID 05f3:0203 PI Engineering, Inc. Bus 001 Device 002: ID 045e:0040 Microsoft Corp. Wheel Mouse Optical Bus 001 Device 001: ID : I don't know what Bus 001 Device 001 is. I could certainly change brands for my card reader (Device 005). The other devices are all required for input (they are my mouse, keyboard). From reading past messages on this bug, I was under the impression that this problem is commonly seen the nVidia chipset found in my Asus A8N5X motherboard. That's why I thought changing motherboards would be the appropriate solution... Thanks for the help! -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
I have the nVidia chipset in an Asus A8N5X motherboard. I had to turn off USB 2.0 support in the bios to work around this bug. Since it does not sound like a resolution for this bug is to be expected soon, I think I will purchase a new motherboard. How can I find out which motherboards will *not* have this problem? Thank you. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213472] Re: Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software
I have not experienced this bug in the last several months. I consider it resolved. -- Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207960] Re: Swapping key functions using xmodmap instead of Gnome Keyboard Layout
Yes, this remains an issue. (I also have related issues with rdesktop, but I suppose that is a different bug.) I'm running the release version of Hardy with current updates. Thank you. ** Attachment added: /var/log/Xorg.0.log and lspci -vvnn http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18442946/logs.zip -- Swapping key functions using xmodmap instead of Gnome Keyboard Layout https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
@alexsott Your error messages look the same as mine. I would also like to know if our issue is the same as this bug. I assumed it was. -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216878] Re: Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy
I'm seeing slow disk transfers with Hardy (8.4.1) on a server. Windows 2003 server on older/slower hardware is performing better. I need to improve the Ubuntu server performance! :) Here are some examples of hdparm results on my Ubuntu Hardy server. These are from a RAID-5 array on an LSI MegaRAID 320-2E SCSI controller with 4x Seagate 15k rpm drives. /dev/mapper/sdX_crypt: Timing cached reads: 1378 MB in 2.00 seconds = 688.89 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 166 MB in 3.01 seconds = 55.12 MB/sec /dev/mapper/sdX_crypt: Timing cached reads: 1368 MB in 2.00 seconds = 683.69 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 170 MB in 3.02 seconds = 56.37 MB/sec I have all the relevant info (dmesg, lspci, lsmod, hdparm, bonnie++ output, etc.) I will post it here if requested. Thanks. -- Slow disk transfer rate on Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216878 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203624] Re: Can't set up encrypted file system at install time in Hardy Alpha Current Daily Build
I was able to install Hardy beta with a fully encrypted file system. I do not remember the details of how I solved all my problems, but it wasn't easy. However, everything is working now. You can mark this bug report as solved. Thank you. ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- Can't set up encrypted file system at install time in Hardy Alpha Current Daily Build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203624 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234824] Re: display error when using switch user feature
regarding compiz, see this forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5040473 A Hardy user in that thread confirmed that the issue happens without compiz enabled. -- display error when using switch user feature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 234824] [NEW] display error when using switch user feature
Public bug reported: See this forum thread: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5040473 I had been working in Hardy with several applications open. A family member came along and switched to their user account for a little while. When finished, they clicked switch user and left the computer at the GDM login screen so I could log in and switch back to my session. When I got back to the computer, the screen was a white-silverish color and blank. It has a mouse cursor, but nothing else. I used ctrl-alt-F1 to switch to a virtual console and with top I see that all my processes are running. However, I cannot figure out how to get my gnome desktop back. Alt-F7 just returns me to the blank white screen. I'm running compiz and nvidia restricted drivers. I do not want to use ctrl-del-backspace or reboot because I was in the middle of unsaved work when we switched users. Solution: Quote: Originally Posted by Nameless Neko I've had this same trouble in the past day or so actually. If you move your mouse around you'll find a spot where you can enter text. It's around the center of the screen for me. If you enter your password there, it usually drops you back into the Gnome desktop. Not sure what's causing this bug to be honest, but this seems to work most of the time for me. I have had to reboot once or twice because of this, though. Edit: Don't think it's a compiz bug. I'm not running compiz on my installation and I still get this bug when switching between the root account and my regular account. Thank you!!! This was the solution. Since we had used the user switching feature, I had to first type my username, then the password and like magic my whole desktop appeared with all my running apps and data! The only way to tell where to type is to watch the mouse point change shape to an I-beam indicating it is in a text input field. The entire screen is completely blank except for the mouse pointer. This must be a bug in either the screen saver or the monitor power saving features. However, I have no idea how to report this bug. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- display error when using switch user feature https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/234824 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 88746] Re: ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
I am experiencing this bug in Ubuntu Hardy. I have the nVidia chipset in an Asus A8N5X motherboard. I had to turn off USB 2.0 support in the bios. I would like to get USB 2.0 back. This is a desktop computer so suspend/resume isn't used. Is the autosuspend=0 workaround still applicable to me? 2.6.24-17-generic #1 SMP Thu May 1 14:31:33 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux Here is my lspci (with USB 2.0 support turned off in the bios). $ lspci 00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) 00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) 00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) 00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) 00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) 00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2) 00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) 00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 8600 GT (rev a1) 05:06.0 Ethernet controller: Linksys Gigabit Network Adapter (rev 10) -- ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176589] Re: compiz randomly freezes X
Bart Verwilst - bug 218726 seems different because in the present bug it is not possible to open a terminal and kill the compiz process on the machine being affected. -- compiz randomly freezes X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176589] Re: compiz randomly freezes X
I have been experimenting with enabling and disabling various compiz plugins too. After I made my previous comment here (2008-04-05) I disabled several of my favorite plugins. One of those plugins I disabled was the animation plugin. After disabling those plugins I have not had any more of the lockups described in this bug. It has been least two weeks, so I think I would have seen the lockup if it was going to happen. So I'm confirming mannheim's observation: no animation plugin, no freezes. -- compiz randomly freezes X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213948] Re: firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin
I just reported a crash as Bug #218987 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.0/+bug/218987 I think it might be the same as this bug. I will try to reproduce using the steps listed here. -- firefox crashed with SIGSEGV with flash plugin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213948 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 173287] Re: [needs-packaging] awn-extras-applets
I would like to see this in Hardy. (I guess it is too late.) -- [needs-packaging] awn-extras-applets https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/173287 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216402] Re: Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov
** Attachment added: MarkAllUpgrades.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13382135/MarkAllUpgrades.txt ** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: udev = update-manager ** Also affects: udev Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216402] [NEW] Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: volumeid Using Hardy beta which was clean-installed from the alternate CD with an encrypted file system. Have been getting automatic updates daily without any problems. Two days ago Update Manager gave me the message: Not all updates can be installed Run a partial update to install as many updates as possible. This can be caused by: *A previous upgrade which didn't complete *Problems with some of the installed software *Unofficial software packages not provided by Ubuntu *Normal changes of a pre-release version of Ubuntu Buttons: Partial Upgrade and Close Each time I get the above dialog, I choose Close. Then I close Update Manager and wait. Some time later I will open Update Manager and do a Check. Initially update manager was telling me I could install 25 updates. Over the last two days that number has increased to 81 as I continue to do new checks. However, I still get the message Not all updates can be installed. I was thinking this would resolve itself, but it hasn't. I have not done the partial upgrade. I am waiting for the Not all updates can be installed message to resolve. I used Synaptic Package Manager to mark all upgrades and the list is attached. (Again, I didn't install/apply anything yet.) volumeid (volume identification tool) is marked for removal. Installed version 117-4ubuntu2 ** Affects: udev Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216402] Re: Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov
sources.list ** Attachment added: sources.list.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13382407/sources.list.txt -- Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 216402] Re: Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov
Resolved! I followed the advice in these 3 forum threads: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751615 - Delete volumeid? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751904 - Anybody having a hard time updating their initramfs today? http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=751775 - 2.6.24-16 kernel My steps: Steps: 1. Don't use update manager for the first part of the update. 2. Open Synaptic and mark initramfs-tools for upgrade Details: volumeid will be removed grub (version 0.97-29ubuntu20) will be upgraded to version 0.97-29ubuntu21 initramfs-tools (version 0.85eubuntu35) will be upgraded to version 0.85eubuntu36 udev (version 117-4ubuntu2) will be upgraded to version 117-8 3. Click Apply - everything proceeded without problems 4. Checked Update Manager and the Not all updates can be installed message is GONE. 5. I decided to reboot, although not required, before doing the rest of the updates. That's where I am now. Hopefully you won't hear anything further from me after the reboot. :) -- Not all updates can be installed- Hardy, volumeid marked for remov https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216402 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
I am not sure which debugging packages to install. (I'm running Hardy.) Do I need xserver-xorg-core-dbg? And which package is compiz debugging? Is is compiz-dev? (Synaptic doesn't list anything with compiz and debug both in the name.) Thanks. -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 48404] Re: java app gui is blank in xgl and java6
I am seeing this bug with Hardy beta (all updates current as of this date) and Sun Java 6. The java app in question is MoneyDance personal finance software. The windows are drawn without content about 30% of the time. Repeatedly closing and re-opening an affected window or dialog box will eventually bring up one that has content. This bug happens only when extra visual effects (compiz) are enabled. When no visual effects are enabled, the bug does not happen. Additionally, it appears not to happen when Metacity WM is enabled (and compiz is disabled). -- java app gui is blank in xgl and java6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/48404 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 118983] Re: compiz java windows always grey
I voted under bug 6632124. Here is my info: The windows are drawn without content about 30% of the time. Repeatedly closing and re-opening an affected window or dialog box will eventually bring up one that has content. This bug happens only when extra visual effects (compiz) are enabled. When no visual effects are enabled, the bug does not happen. Additionally, it appears not to happen when Metacity WM is enabled (and compiz is disabled). additional info: $ java -version java version 1.6.0_05 Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.6.0_05-b13) Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 10.0-b19, mixed mode) $ uname -r 2.6.24-15-generic Ubuntu Hardy beta $ compiz --version Checking for Xgl: not present. Detected PCI ID for VGA: 01:00.0 0300: 10de:0402 (rev a1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller]) Checking for texture_from_pixmap: present. Checking for non power of two support: present. Checking for Composite extension: present. Comparing resolution (3840x1200) to maximum 3D texture size (8192): Passed. Checking for nVidia: present. Checking for FBConfig: present. Checking for Xgl: not present. compiz 0.7.2 additional info: I can confirm that making the apparently empty window (or dialog) extremely large will show some of its content. (If I could make it large enough, I would assume it would show all content.) -- compiz java windows always grey https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 208487] Re: Keyboard Layout Options Bugging In Terminal Server Client
correction use: sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap -- Keyboard Layout Options Bugging In Terminal Server Client https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/208487 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 207960] Re: keyboard layout changes are problematic
correction - wrong: sudo loadkeys /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap right: sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap -- keyboard layout changes are problematic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210094] Re: Incorrect keys sent to Windows Server by tsclient
The line above that says sudo loadkeys /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap should use xmodmap instead of loadkeys -- Incorrect keys sent to Windows Server by tsclient https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211341] Re: tsclient doesn't use keyboard layout settings and sends wrong keys
correction use: sudo xmodmap /etc/SwapCapsCtrl.kmap -- tsclient doesn't use keyboard layout settings and sends wrong keys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213472] [NEW] Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software
Public bug reported: Background: The confirmation dialog to install new software darkens (shades) the entire screen while the dialog is active. Problem: screen remains dark and confirmation dialog remains on screen after clicking OK to dismiss the dialog. Expected behavior: After dismissing the dialog (by clicking OK), the dialog box should disappear and the darkened (shaded) screen should return to normal color. Steps to reproduce: This has happened to me in various situations. However, here is the most recent occurrence: 1. went to website that required Flash. Chose to install Flash. (This step is OPTIONAL! The problem happens with any step that requires the administrative confirmation, but it is also random. It doesn't happen every single time.) 2. The confirmation dialog to perform admin tasks came on screen and the screen became shaded a darker color. 3. I entered my password. 4. I clicked OK. The dialog did not disappear. The screen remained dark (shaded). 5. The software installation process continued normallly without errors. 6. The screen remained shaded. 7. I worked around this bug by switching desktops, then switching back. That forced the entire screen to redraw and the shade returned to normal. I'm running Hardy i386 with nVidia and dual monitors. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 213472] Re: Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software
screen shot attached. ** Attachment added: ScreenNotRefreshedAfterShadingForConfirmationDialog.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13176939/ScreenNotRefreshedAfterShadingForConfirmationDialog.png -- Screen not redrawn after confirmation dialog to install new software https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/213472 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
I have been experiencing the exact same things in Hardy beta with all updates applied. -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
xsession errors ** Attachment added: xsession-errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137422/xsession-errors -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
lspci ** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137429/lspci -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
Xorg.0.log ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137437/Xorg.0.log -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
how do I reopen this bug report? -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
btw, I am not the original reporter. My situation however, is the same. -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 161150] Re: Compiz locks screen randomly on ubuntu gutsy
See this similar bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/176589 The problem lives in Hardy. How do we reopen this bug? Or should we just point it to the other bug report? (I'm a newbie.) -- Compiz locks screen randomly on ubuntu gutsy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/161150 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
my kernel info: 2.6.24-14-generic i386 Hardy beta Pyry - what is your kernel now? -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176589] Re: compiz randomly freezes X
Xorg.0.log ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137617/Xorg.0.log -- compiz randomly freezes X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176589] Re: compiz randomly freezes X
lspci ** Attachment added: lspci http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137612/lspci -- compiz randomly freezes X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 176589] Re: compiz randomly freezes X
Same problem here on Ubuntu Hardy beta. Ctrl-Alt-Backspace has no effect and Ctrl-Alt-Del has no effect. Ctrl-Alt-F1 and all other keys or key combinations have no effect. However, I am able to connect to my frozen/locked desktop computer by ssh from my laptop. Top shows compiz.real at 100% CPU. Doing pkill -9 compiz.real causes X to restart on my desktop computer. I can then log back in. See this similar bug report: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/186058 I paraphrase: From this I came to the conclusion that Hardy's compiz must have some hard to find problems which cause random freezes. Needless to say (but lets say it anyway), that the problem is not related to xorg configuration or graphics drivers as the same freeze effects occured in many different machines (with completely different hw). Any advice on how to provide extra info with this bug report (taking account of the fact that the desktop freezes completely but I'm still able to connect with ssh)? I'm attaching: ~/.xsession-errors, /var/log/Xorg.0.log and the output of lspci -vvnn as separate attachments ** Attachment added: xsession-errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13137606/xsession-errors -- compiz randomly freezes X https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176589 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
I have attached the missing info that the original reporter did not attach. With that I am reopening the bug. Hope that is OK. ** Changed in: compiz (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 186058] Re: Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze
When compiz.real is the process consuming 99-100% CPU, how do we get a backtrace? I see some info on backtracing for Xorg here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingXorg If someone tells me how to do it in the context of this (compiz- related?) bug, I will do it. Thanks. -- Compiz-fusion makes the desktop freeze https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186058 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
** Also affects: sambaserver Importance: Undecided Status: New -- gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 210881] Re: Nautilus shows incorrect location and tree position
Can you provide the bug number for the other bug report? I would like to understand how I missed seeing it. My experience as a new user is that reporting bugs is difficult. For example, I searched trying to find if this bug had already been reported and I couldn't find it. I am not criticizing anyone -- just offering my feedback that maybe other new Ubuntu users like me could experience difficulty (and frustration) trying to report bugs. -- Nautilus shows incorrect location and tree position https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/210881 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 211341] [NEW] tsclient doesn't use keyboard layout settings and sends wrong keys
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tsclient In Ubuntu Hardy I have used the keyboard preferences to change keyboard layout options. Those layout options are not used by tsclient 0.150 (Terminal Server Client) and therefore it sends the wrong keys to the Windows server. ** Affects: tsclient (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- tsclient doesn't use keyboard layout settings and sends wrong keys https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/211341 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
