[Bug 1864298] Re: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3"
** Tags added: xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864298 Title: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1864298/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1864298] Re: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3"
Same for xenial (with a different warning of course): [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000509 2020] [:notice] [pid 22739] ModSecurity for Apache/2.9.0 (http://www.modsecurity.org/) configured. [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000529 2020] [:notice] [pid 22739] ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.5.1"; loaded version="1.5.2" [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000533 2020] [:warn] [pid 22739] ModSecurity: Loaded APR do not match with compiled! [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000537 2020] [:notice] [pid 22739] ModSecurity: PCRE compiled version="8.35 "; loaded version="8.38 2015-11-23" [Thu Sep 10 21:57:05.000540 2020] [:warn] [pid 22739] ModSecurity: Loaded PCRE do not match with compiled! i think this is what is crashing my apache at the moment at every graceful restart. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864298 Title: Modsecurity apache warning: ModSecurity: APR compiled version="1.6.2"; loaded version="1.6.3" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/modsecurity-apache/+bug/1864298/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1555171] Re: systemd does not shut down rsyslog
expected behaviour: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815862#10 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #815862 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815862 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1555171 Title: systemd does not shut down rsyslog To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rsyslog/+bug/1555171/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1746995] Re: regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails
Hi,
After a few kicks and reboots I'll say that it does not work. The strace
is much different though, but it trips over a message that's in
Florian's patch.
14151 lstat(".gfid/f55c143a-83a5-4ca0-a833-95ff8e30ff32",
{st_mode=S_IFREG|0666, st_size=3257, ...}) = 0
14151 stat(".gfid", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
14151 mmap(NULL, 266240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x7facbe951000
14151 getxattr(".gfid", "system.posix_acl_access", 0x7ffc7f0b63b0, 132) = -1
EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not supported)
14151 getxattr(".gfid", "system.posix_acl_default", 0x7ffc7f0b63b0, 132) = -1
EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not supported)
14151 llistxattr(".gfid", 0x55954b86dc10, 1024) = -1 EOPNOTSUPP (Operation not
supported)
14151 mmap(NULL, 266240, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x7facbe91
14151 write(2, "rsync: unknown current directory for \".gfid\": No such file or
directory (2)", 75) = 75
14151 write(2, "\n", 1) = 1
14151 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR1, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7facbddcb4b0}, NULL,
8) = 0
14151 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7facbddcb4b0}, NULL,
8) = 0
14151 wait4(14152, 0x7ffc7f0b85e4, WNOHANG, NULL) = 0
14151 getpid() = 14151
14151 kill(14152, SIGUSR1) = 0
14151 write(2, "rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs (code 3)
at util.c(1057) [sender=3.1.1]", 94) = 94
14151 write(2, "\n", 1) = 1
14151 select(6, [5], [4], [5], {30, 0}) = 1 (out [4], left {29, 98})
14151 write(4, "\x04\x00\x00\x5d\x03\x00\x00\x00", 8) = 8
14151 select(6, [5], [4], [5], {30, 0}) = 1 (out [4], left {29, 98})
14151 write(4,
"\x20\x00\x00\x07\x05\x21\x05\x2e\x67\x66\x69\x64\x00\x00\x10\x5a\xf2\x16\x7c\xf0\x1b\xdc\xe1\x2e\xed\x41\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00",
36) = 36
14151 select(6, [5], [], [5], {30, 0}
14152 <... poll resumed> ) = ? ERESTART_RESTARTBLOCK (Interrupted
by signal)
14152 --- SIGUSR1 {si_signo=SIGUSR1, si_code=SI_USER, si_pid=14151, si_uid=0}
---
14151 <... select resumed> )= 1 (in [5], left {29, 999641})
14151 read(5, "", 32768)= 0
14151 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR1, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7facbddcb4b0}, NULL,
8) = 0
14151 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7facbddcb4b0}, NULL,
8) = 0
14151 exit_group(3) = ?
14151 +++ exited with 3 +++
14152 +++ killed by SIGUSR1 +++
full strace here:
https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/26540269/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746995
Title:
regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication
fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1746995/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1746995] Re: regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails
I do now:
11051 geteuid() = 0
11051 getegid() = 0
11051 umask(0) = 022
11051 umask(022)= 0
11051 brk(NULL) = 0x55f0d0a14000
11051 brk(0x55f0d0a35000) = 0x55f0d0a35000
11051 open("/usr/lib/locale/locale-archive", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
11051 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2276256, ...}) = 0
11051 mmap(NULL, 2276256, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, 3, 0) = 0x7f43b7a35000
11051 close(3) = 0
11051 open("/usr/etc/popt", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11051 open("/etc/popt", O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
11051 stat("/etc/popt.d", 0x7ffcb94d9230) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or
directory)
11051 rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {0x55f0cffb8ac0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_NOCLDSTOP,
0x7f43b7c964b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
11051 rt_sigaction(SIGHUP, {0x55f0cffb8ac0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_NOCLDSTOP,
0x7f43b7c964b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
11051 rt_sigaction(SIGTERM, {0x55f0cffb8ac0, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_NOCLDSTOP,
0x7f43b7c964b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
11051 rt_sigprocmask(SIG_UNBLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 TERM CHLD], NULL, 8) = 0
11051 rt_sigaction(SIGPIPE, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_NOCLDSTOP,
0x7f43b7c964b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
11051 rt_sigaction(SIGXFSZ, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER|SA_NOCLDSTOP,
0x7f43b7c964b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
11051 getcwd("(unreachable)/", 4095)= 15
11051 lstat(".", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
11051 lstat("/", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
11051 openat(AT_FDCWD, "..", O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 3
11051 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
11051 fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...}) = 0
11051 fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0x8000 (flags O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE)
11051 fcntl(3, F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC) = 0
11051 mmap(NULL, 135168, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1,
0) = 0x7f43b883c000
11051 getdents(3, /* 11 entries */, 131072) = 376
11051 getdents(3, /* 0 entries */, 131072) = 0
11051 lseek(3, 0, SEEK_SET) = 0
11051 getdents(3, /* 11 entries */, 131072) = 376
11051 newfstatat(3, ".trashcan", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
11051 newfstatat(3, "acme", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
11051 newfstatat(3, "web", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0777, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
11051 newfstatat(3, "XXX", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
11051 newfstatat(3, "glbackup", {st_mode=S_IFDIR, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
11051 getdents(3, /* 0 entries */, 131072) = 0
11051 munmap(0x7f43b883c000, 135168)= 0
11051 close(3) = 0
11051 write(2, "rsync: getcwd(): No such file or directory (2)", 46) = 46
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746995
Title:
regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication
fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1746995/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1746995] [NEW] regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication fails
Public bug reported:
Since somewhere in the Jan 14-18 range my glusterfs georeplication
reports Faulty. Georeplication uses rsync internally, and tracking this
this down leads to an exit code 3 out of rsync.
I have no stacktraces myself, but I found this report about the same
problem:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/gluster-users/msg33568.html
with traces:
strace rsync :
30743 23:34:47 newfstatat(3, "6737", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
30743 23:34:47 newfstatat(3, "6741", {st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=4096, ...},
AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW) = 0
30743 23:34:47 getdents(3, /* 0 entries */, 131072) = 0
30743 23:34:47 munmap(0x7fa4feae7000, 135168) = 0
30743 23:34:47 close(3) = 0
30743 23:34:47 write(2, "rsync: getcwd(): No such file or directory (2)", 46) =
46
30743 23:34:47 write(2, "\n", 1)= 1
30743 23:34:47 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR1, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER,
0x7fa4fdf404b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
30743 23:34:47 rt_sigaction(SIGUSR2, {SIG_IGN, [], SA_RESTORER,
0x7fa4fdf404b0}, NULL, 8) = 0
30743 23:34:47 write(2, "rsync error: errors selecting input/output files, dirs
(code 3) at util.c(1056) [Receiver=3.1.1]", 96) = 96
30743 23:34:47 write(2, "\n", 1)= 1
30743 23:34:47 exit_group(3)= ?
30743 23:34:47 +++ exited with 3 +++
The Changelog of glibc mentions that getcwd has been changed:
* SECURITY UPDATE: Buffer underflow in realpath()
- debian/patches/any/cvs-make-getcwd-fail-if-path-is-no-absolute.diff:
Make getcwd(3) fail if it cannot obtain an absolute path
- CVE-2018-101
and downgrading glibc to (2.23-0ubuntu3) indeed fixes my georeplication
problem. 0ubuntu3 is the latest version that is available in the
repositories, other than 0ubuntu10.
** Affects: glibc (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1746995
Title:
regression in 2.23-0ubuntu10: rsync in glusterfs's georeplication
fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/glibc/+bug/1746995/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1186532] Re: Missing version information libmysqlclient18 on Debian Wheezy
** Also affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1186532 Title: Missing version information libmysqlclient18 on Debian Wheezy To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/percona-server/+bug/1186532/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 782116] Re: Package OpenNTPd does not install
This isn't really a bug in the openntpd package, it's a result of the
fact that the 'ntp' package and the 'openntpd' package use the same
filename for the daemon. I'm willing to bet that each and every one of
you here first had 'ntp' installed and then upgraded to 'openntpd'.
'ntp' leaved an apparmor profile behind, and that isn't tuned for
openntpd.
So the solution here is to first (!) run 'apparmor_parser -R
/etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.ntpd' and then 'apt-get purge ntp'.
If you try to do it the other way around the usr.sbin.ntpd profile is
gone and you have to place a dummy profile in its place, apparmor_parser
-R needs a file, even if it's almost emtpy.
A file with
/usr/sbin/ntpd {
}
in it will do.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/782116
Title:
Package OpenNTPd does not install
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openntpd/+bug/782116/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391151] Re: xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy)
I suppose it wasn't possible, but hey! there's Precise, xdelta3 passes its selftest there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391151 Title: xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xdelta3/+bug/391151/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 743677] Re: attempt to ban ip: global name 'time' is not defined
Trivial patch from upstream: https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/743677 Title: attempt to ban ip: global name 'time' is not defined To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fail2ban/+bug/743677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134873] Re: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors
I understand the reason for the openssl 1.0.1e release is exactly this corruption. http://www.openssl.org/source/exp/CHANGES Can we upgrade to 1.0.1e like debian has? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134873 Title: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/1134873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1134873] Re: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors
Thanks for clarifying! For the unsuspecting newcomer: Username/pass for rt.openssl.org is guest/guest. I had looked at the upstream bug but hit the login-wall and looked no further. This time I googled some more and found http://www.openssl.org/support/rt.html . -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134873 Title: regression in 1.0.1-4ubuntu5.6 causes connection errors To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/openssl/+bug/1134873/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714904] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre-up.d)
Re #14: I have tested natty (apt-get purge ifenslave-2.6; apt-get install ifenslave-2.6) and bonding works now without additional up and down clauses in the /etc/network/interfaces file. Relevant section of /etc/network/interfaces (two servers connected back- to-back with each other): auto bond0 iface bond0 inet static address 192.168.111.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 bond-slaves eth1 eth2 eth3 bond-mode balance-rr bond_arp_ip_target 192.168.111.2 bond_arp_interval 1000 mtu 9000 auto eth1 iface eth1 inet manual bond-master bond0 mtu 9000 auto eth2 iface eth2 inet manual bond-master bond0 mtu 9000 auto eth3 iface eth3 inet manual bond-master bond0 mtu 9000 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714904 Title: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre- up.d) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/714904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 714904] Re: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre-up.d)
Indeed I had read so elsewhere and have tried that but I couldn't get bond0 up then. But the second part of your second sentence woke me up just now: Instead of just 'ifup bond0' and be done the command I have to do is 'ifup bond0 ifup eth1 ifup eth2 ifup eth3' :) Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/714904 Title: /etc/network/if-up.d/ifenslave is missing (installed under if-pre- up.d) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifenslave-2.6/+bug/714904/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Installed yesterday, tested today and works as it should. ** Tags added: verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 Title: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Installed yesterday, tested today and works as it should. ** Tags added: verified ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verified -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 Title: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536803] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939!
same here, using lucid, kernel 2.6.32-22-server -- kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 536803] Re: kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939!
Er, scratch that. -- kernel BUG at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.24/fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c:939! https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536803 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
This bug blocks the upgrade of our server farm to Lucid since we're importing databases on a daily basis. Is there a place that I can track progress of this 6-line patch? What is the usual path? Or can I please please please get an update? If this takes four months, then I'll look for a workaround, but if this could be fixed next week (say), I'll keep restarting the replication manually... -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Chuck, any ideas on the timeline for the inclusion of the fix for this bug? There has been a security upgrade since you made the fix available in your ppa, so we're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place... Thanks! -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Chuck, any ideas on the timeline for the inclusion of the fix for this bug? There has been a security upgrade since you made the fix available in your ppa, so we're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place... Thanks! -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Seems to work, thanks! r...@miho:/home/mrten# apt-cache policy mysql-server mysql-server: Installed: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Candidate: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Version table: *** 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Seems to work, thanks! r...@miho:/home/mrten# apt-cache policy mysql-server mysql-server: Installed: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Candidate: 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 Version table: *** 5.1.41-3ubuntu12.2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573436] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0
This affects imap.ini and mcrypt.ini, too. PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/imap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 -- PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to php5 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice
Ahh, so you have FIVE PPA's. apt-get upgraded, rebooted, no change. r...@lida:/var/log/munin# apt-cache policy munin-node munin-node: Installed: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.4.4-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages That's one server, want me to test something else on the other? -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 573436] Re: PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0
This affects imap.ini and mcrypt.ini, too. PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/imap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/mcrypt.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 -- PHP Deprecated: Comments starting with '#' are deprecated in /etc/php5/cli/conf.d/ldap.ini on line 1 in Unknown on line 0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573436 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice
Ahh, so you have FIVE PPA's. apt-get upgraded, rebooted, no change. r...@lida:/var/log/munin# apt-cache policy munin-node munin-node: Installed: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Candidate: 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 Version table: *** 1.4.4-1ubuntu2 0 500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/zulcss/server-bug-fixes/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1.4.4-1ubuntu1 0 500 http://nl.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages That's one server, want me to test something else on the other? -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
This one? http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 ** Bug watch added: MySQL Bug System #49479 http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice
I can help out here, I've still got two servers that I didn't touch after upgrade from hardy to lucid. However, I don't see a recent munin or munin-node in your PPA. -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to munin in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
This one? http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 ** Bug watch added: MySQL Bug System #49479 http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479 -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 574704] Re: munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice
I can help out here, I've still got two servers that I didn't touch after upgrade from hardy to lucid. However, I don't see a recent munin or munin-node in your PPA. -- munin-node after update to Lucid still in /etc/rc*.d, invoked twice https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574704 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
** Patch added: patch taken from mysql commit log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48235687/tmp.patch -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to mysql-dfsg-5.1 in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 576949] Re: [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
** Patch added: patch taken from mysql commit log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48235687/tmp.patch -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 576949] [NEW] [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43
Public bug reported: LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication when there are keywords or braces in columnnames. This is a known bug in mysql: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=49479, which is fixed in 5.1.43. However, Lucid LTS has 5.1.41. Would it be possible to include the (very simple) patch mentioned in the mysql bugreport (it's the same as the one committed to mysql, check out the commit here: http://lists.mysql.com/commits/92988) in the package for Lucid? ** Affects: mysql-dfsg-5.1 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch in 5.1.43 + [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 -- [lucid] LOAD DATA INFILE fails in replication, simple patch available in 5.1.43 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576949 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
This is 8.04.3 LTS, looking at apt-cache policy I see I've pulled nagios3 as backport from rogerw's ppa (mentioned in bug 240764). -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
This is 8.04.3 LTS, looking at apt-cache policy I see I've pulled nagios3 as backport from rogerw's ppa (mentioned in bug 240764). -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
This bug affects nagios3 as well, the patch from comment #4 fixes the issue. -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to freeradius in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 252686] Re: Reload action on init script kills daemon
This bug affects nagios3 as well, the patch from comment #4 fixes the issue. -- Reload action on init script kills daemon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252686 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 391151] [NEW] xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy)
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xdelta3 $ xdelta3 test xdelta3: testing random_numbers... success xdelta3: testing decode_integer_end_of_input... success xdelta3: testing decode_integer_overflow... success xdelta3: testing encode_decode_uint32_t. success xdelta3: testing encode_decode_uint64_t... success xdelta3: testing usize_t_overflow... success xdelta3: testing forward_match... success xdelta3: testing address_cache... success xdelta3: testing string_matching... success xdelta3: testing choose_instruction... success xdelta3: testing identical_behavior... success xdelta3: testing in_memory... success xdelta3: testing iopt_flush_instructions... success xdelta3: testing source_cksum_offset... success xdelta3: testing secondary_huff... ...2.0007.2198.4694.9224.9227.0488.0732.0307.9387.4082.618 ...2.6407.6568.5314.9974.9977.1708.2062.0336.9556.4182.448 ...2.6407.6568.5625.0665.0667.2648.3032.0346.3835.8311.843 ...2.7207.6888.5625.0945.0947.2818.4172.0385.9975.4361.679 ...2.7207.6888.5945.1525.1527.3398.4772.0395.6805.1171.654 ...2.8007.7198.5945.1695.1697.3848.5912.0395.4234.8691.567 ...2.8007.7508.5945.2115.2117.4418.6142.0365.2244.6541.352 ...2.8807.7508.6255.2475.2477.4988.7252.0415.0454.4711.352 success xdelta3: testing secondary_fgk... ...1.12011.00015.0004.9864.9867.2638.4472.2568.0087.4092.618 success xdelta3: testing decompress_single_bit_error success xdelta3: testing decompress_single_bit_error (XD3_ADLER32) success xdelta3: testing decompress_single_bit_error (XD3_SEC_FGK) success xdelta3: testing decompress_single_bit_error (XD3_SEC_DJW)...non-failures 17; expected 18 failed: incorrect: XD3_INTERNAL This is a known issue that causes dataloss: http://code.google.com/p/xdelta/issues/detail?id=51 Possibly related: http://code.google.com/p/xdelta/issues/detail?id=50 and should be fixed in a later version. Would it be possible to upgrade xdelta3 in hardy to a later version or should I check out backports? ** Affects: xdelta3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- xdelta3.0s failes internal test on amd64 (hardy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/391151 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136835] Re: smartd says not capable of SMART self-check while smartctl works
I see this on hardy, but not on all hardies I manage. It's a SAMSUNG HE103UJ though, and I have no register values logged. -- smartd says not capable of SMART self-check while smartctl works https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 254326] Re: BUG: soft lockup - CPU #1 stuck for 11s -- Ubuntu 8.04.1 Kernel 2.6.24-19
There is an issue with the D945GCLF: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11976 -- BUG: soft lockup - CPU #1 stuck for 11s -- Ubuntu 8.04.1 Kernel 2.6.24-19 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530
** Description changed: - After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10 alpha 6, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. + After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. I did not have this problem with 8.04, it appeared after the upgrade. What should happen: Closing the laptop lid/screen should turn of the screen while on AC-power, or suspend/hibernate while on battery. What happens: Nothing. Ubuntu doesn't seem to notice that screen is closed. - Also, suspend/hibernate doesn't work at all, when i choose Shut down - - Hibernate in the ubuntu menu, nothing happens. I have also tried the - s2both-app, but it doesn't work either. I don't know if this should be a - separate bug? - Se also: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=927237 Other HP 530 users are experiencing the same problem. Thanks for any help :) -- No action when closing screen on HP 530 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530
After a recent update, suspend is working again, but still no progress with the closing screen problem. -- No action when closing screen on HP 530 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277534] Re: No action when closing screen on HP 530
Hello I'm a bit dissapointed over the lack of feedback on this bug. This is a regression, it has been confirmed by other HP 530 users, but still no-one has shown any interest in fixing this bug. I'm monitoring this bug, so if any developers want information or whatever from me, just tell. I'm very interested in getting this bug fixed, as I am sick of having to shut down my computer in fear of overheating if i just leave it on. -- No action when closing screen on HP 530 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 277534] [NEW] No action when closing screen on HP 530
Public bug reported: After upgrading to Ubuntu 8.10 alpha 6, my HP 530 laptop fails to suspend/blank screen when closed. I did not have this problem with 8.04, it appeared after the upgrade. What should happen: Closing the laptop lid/screen should turn of the screen while on AC-power, or suspend/hibernate while on battery. What happens: Nothing. Ubuntu doesn't seem to notice that screen is closed. Also, suspend/hibernate doesn't work at all, when i choose Shut down - Hibernate in the ubuntu menu, nothing happens. I have also tried the s2both-app, but it doesn't work either. I don't know if this should be a separate bug? Se also: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=927237 Other HP 530 users are experiencing the same problem. Thanks for any help :) ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No action when closing screen on HP 530 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
