Re: [Bug 1958308] Re: New upstream release - please update
On Mon, 31 Jan 2022, 07:05 Neil Mayhew, <1958...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > FYI, Debian will likely update again to 8.12.42 which is a better release > to work with long-term. > 8.12.42 is now in Debian testing. Will Ubuntu sync again automatically? > -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958308 Title: New upstream release - please update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libphonenumber/+bug/1958308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958308] Re: New upstream release - please update
> Debian update to the current version which got synced to Ubuntu That's good to hear. FYI, Debian will likely update again to 8.12.42 which is a better release to work with long-term. (It has a git tag, and the artefact versions don't have "-SNAPSHOT" in them). I assume this will sync automatically and still arrive well before the jammy freeze. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958308 Title: New upstream release - please update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libphonenumber/+bug/1958308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958308] Re: New upstream release - please update
Thank you for the suggestion. I linked to the upstream bug report that describes the issue, but I can see that it's helpful to have a brief summary in both downstream issues. Previously, the C/C++ version of libphonenumber was accepting and parsing phone numbers that have malformed UTF-8 sequences in them, by converting the offending bytes to spaces. It now rejects the input instead of returning a phone number, which the Java version has always done. Accepting malformed UTF-8 is a potential security issue. libphonenumber was also accepting well-formed input containing invalid code points like U+0096 (a C1 control character) which can be the result of a bad conversion from Windows 1252 legacy encoding where N DASH (U+2013) is represented by \x96. If the legacy text is treated as iso-8859-1 instead of windows-1252, \x96 will be converted to U+0096 instead of U+2013. This type of input is now rejected as well. Let me know if this explanation could be improved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958308 Title: New upstream release - please update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libphonenumber/+bug/1958308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1958308] [NEW] New upstream release - please update
Public bug reported: The upstream project is now at 8.12.41. There are a number of bug fixes in this release, including one for handling invalid UTF-8 sequences correctly in the C version of the library. See: * https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/206677455 * https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/pull/2698 * https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/releases/tag/v8.12.41 I would very much like to see this version make it into Jammy. I've reported this as Debian bug #1003972 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003972). I don't know how likely it is that this will get into Bookworm before the Jammy feature freeze on Feb 23. ** Affects: libphonenumber (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: The upstream project is now at 8.12.41. There are a number of bug fixes in this release, including one for handling invalid UTF-8 sequences - correctly. + correctly in the C version of the library. See: * https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/206677455 * https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/pull/2698 * https://github.com/google/libphonenumber/releases/tag/v8.12.41 I would very much like to see this version make it into Jammy. I've reported this as Debian bug #1003972 (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1003972). I don't know how likely it is that this will get into Bookworm before the Jammy feature freeze on Feb 23. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958308 Title: New upstream release - please update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libphonenumber/+bug/1958308/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1797390] Re: Update to 8.9.15
Debian just updated to 8.12.16 and its bug was closed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1797390 Title: Update to 8.9.15 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libphonenumber/+bug/1797390/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU
@nader-f: You're probably using an out-of-date ISO for your VM. This issue was fixed in 16.04 a long time ago. Be sure to use the 16.04.1 ISO and not the original 16.04 ISO in the future. The [change summary for 16.04.1][1] specifically mentions this bug as having been fixed. [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/XenialXerus/ReleaseNotes/ChangeSummary/16.04.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712 Title: Refresh hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576780] Re: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos
Works well for me (0.5.13-1ubuntu2). Thanks for getting this done. I assume it can go into -updates now. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576780 Title: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1576780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU
The simplest workaround seems to be to use Ctrl-C when apt update hangs at the end. It's already done most of the work, and this just aborts the running of appstreamcli at the end. You can then go ahead and update any binary packages built from the appstream source package (ie any of appstream appstream-doc appstream-index gir1.2-appstream libappstream- dev libappstream3 libappstreamqt-dev libappstreamqt1 that are already installed). The use of appstreamcli in the postinst shouldn't hang because the new versions of appstreamcli and libappstream.so.3 will already be in place. However, using Ctrl-C is possible only when using the command line. I'm not sure what happens if someone is using Synaptic or Gnome Software. I assume it would be necessary to use System Monitor to kill off appstreamcli. I'm concerned that we could see breakage in a very large number of Xenial installations, all of which would require manual intervention to get them unstuck. The fact that this is happening now, when it hasn't been reported in the past 3 years, must be due to a subtle change in the execution environment, maybe due to updates in other shared libraries that appstreamcli uses. The problem is a result of reading uninitialized memory, and in the past it must have been pure luck that the memory always contained zeroes. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712 Title: Refresh hangs indefinitely, appstreamcli using 100% CPU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576780] Re: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos
This works great for me here too. All my 3rd-party apps are showing in Gnome Software. Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576780 Title: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1576780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string
** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712 Title: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string
Sorry to be slow in responding. I thought I was subscribed but wasn't. The version from -proposed (0.9.4-1ubuntu1) resolves this issue for me. Thanks! Great to have this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712 Title: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1579712] Re: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string
I would really like to see this go through as an SRU to Xenial. I am hitting a problem with my third-party repo 100% of the time. When I have the repo enabled, apt-get update hangs indefinitely when it runs appstreamcli at the end, and I assume all of the users of my repo are experiencing the same problem. With a package built using the debdiff given here, apt-get and appstreamcli run just fine. If the size of the changes here are a problem, the one-liner mentioned above would be sufficient for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579712 Title: Refresh hangs due to strdup on non-NULL terminated string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream/+bug/1579712/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1576780] Re: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos
I have a 3rd-party repo (packages.sil.org/ubuntu) and I can confirm that this change enables Gnome Software to work correctly with my repo. Previously my apps weren't showing up, but now they are. I built a copy of appstream-glib_0.5.13-1 with this debdiff applied, installed it on a xenial system, and everything works nicely. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576780 Title: Needs to implement the full DEP-11 icon spec for compatibility with 3rd-party repos To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/appstream-glib/+bug/1576780/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 945450] Re: Responsiveness: LightDM in ubuntu 12.04 very slow
I think I may have found the cause of the problem, or a very similar one, at least. See bug #1005642 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945450 Title: Responsiveness: LightDM in ubuntu 12.04 very slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/945450/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004295] [NEW] pandoc is linked against a non-existent libffi.so.5
Public bug reported: pandoc fails to load: $ pandoc --help pandoc: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory $ ldd $(which pandoc) libffi.so.5 = not found The package depends on libffi6 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: pandoc 1.8.1.1-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-20.34-generic 3.0.30 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-20-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: c48372b45788f96938ae8861f1edc626 CheckboxSystem: abf102d6ef41328208f5c1554651535a Date: Thu May 24 22:30:47 2012 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pandoc UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-05-24 (1 days ago) ** Affects: pandoc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004295 Title: pandoc is linked against a non-existent libffi.so.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandoc/+bug/1004295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004295] Re: pandoc is linked against a non-existent libffi.so.5
** Description changed: pandoc fails to load: - $ pandoc --help - pandoc: error while loading shared libraries: libffi.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory - $ ldd $(which pandoc) - libffi.so.5 = not found + $ pandoc --help + pandoc: error while loading shared libraries: + libffi.so.5: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory + $ ldd $(which pandoc) + libffi.so.5 = not found The package depends on libffi6 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: pandoc 1.8.1.1-1ubuntu2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-20.34-generic 3.0.30 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-20-generic i686 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: c48372b45788f96938ae8861f1edc626 CheckboxSystem: abf102d6ef41328208f5c1554651535a Date: Thu May 24 22:30:47 2012 ProcEnviron: - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + PATH=(custom, user) + LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: pandoc UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2012-05-24 (1 days ago) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004295 Title: pandoc is linked against a non-existent libffi.so.5 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pandoc/+bug/1004295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790981] Re: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow
Great! Thanks, Oliver. Once it's been accepted into the Oneiric package, I'd like to do an SRU request for Lucid, since a number of my users prefer LTS. I've done an SRU before, so I think I'll be able to handle this once it's in Oneiric. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981 Title: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-imagewriter/+bug/790981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790981] Re: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow
I would have rated this a good bit higher than wishlist. It really is unusable at the moment. It takes hours when it should take minutes. The patch is quite trivial. Any chance it could be integrated soon? I want to recommend this utility to the users of the SD-based remix I'm distributing, but have to tell them to use dd instead as the utility is unusable. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981 Title: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-imagewriter/+bug/790981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790981] Re: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow
Thanks, Brian. I saw in some manual dd instructions on LP somewhere that bs=4M was being recommended, so this might be even better than the bs=1M in the patch. I have also posted an (unrelated) patch for the win32 equivalent of this application (https://bugs.launchpad.net/win32-image-writer/+bug/724102). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981 Title: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usb-imagewriter/+bug/790981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790981] [NEW] usb-imagewriter is excessively slow
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usb-imagewriter The reason is that it gives dd too small a buffer size. Using bs=1M makes it go much faster. Other sizes may be even better. Ubuntu 10.10 usb-imagewriter 0.1.3-0ubuntu4 ** Affects: usb-imagewriter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981 Title: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790981] Re: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow
** Patch added: Use bs=1M https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981/+attachment/2149903/+files/imagewriter.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790981 Title: usb-imagewriter is excessively slow -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 647731] Re: java SIGSEGV in libGL.so.1
This could possibly be related to #773339 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647731 Title: java SIGSEGV in libGL.so.1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 650525] Re: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key
** Changed in: ubuntu-extras-keyring (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Changed in: ubuntu-extras-keyring (Ubuntu Maverick) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 650525] Re: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key
The link I quoted above is for lucid. You need a different key for maverick: gpg --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv 02FDF932 gpg --export --armor 02FDF932 | sudo apt-key add - @Linus, Mark: please say whether this works for you. I think the extras archive is using the wrong key for maverick. It should be using the one that's in the ubuntu-extras-keyring (Ubuntu Extras Archive Automatic Signing Key) instead of this one (Launchpad Application Review Board PPA). -- Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 650525] Re: Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key
extras.ubuntu.com seems to have changed key since this bug was first posted, and it no longer matches the one in ubuntu-extras-keyring (2010.09.27). I imported it manually using gpg --recv with the number given in the apt-get update error message. Now when I run apt-key list this key shows up as Launchpad Application Review Board PPA. Instructions for importing the key manually are given here: http://www.ubuntugeek.com/fix-for-gpg-error-httpextras-ubuntu-com-maverick-release.html -- Failed to fetch http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/maverick/Release ; missing key https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/650525 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 539008] Re: Microsoft Sans Serif maps to Thai font even on european setups
@cablop: A fixed version was already in maverick. See bug #637131 for details. -- Microsoft Sans Serif maps to Thai font even on european setups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539008 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 434054] Re: Waree font too high compared to Tahoma
** Attachment added: Test case https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thaifonts-scalable/+bug/434054/+attachment/1734639/+files/Tahoma-Test.html -- Waree font too high compared to Tahoma https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637131] Re: FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick
I tested the new package (1:0.4.13-4ubuntu0.1) against both reported bugs (bug #434054 and bug #539008) using the test cases listed there. No regressions or other problems detected. -- FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 434054] Re: Waree font too high compared to Tahoma
** Attachment added: Improved test case https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thaifonts-scalable/+bug/434054/+attachment/1734819/+files/Tahoma-Test.html -- Waree font too high compared to Tahoma https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/434054 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637131] Re: FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick
Thanks, Benjamin. So will this new version just show up in Lucid now, or do I have to do something else to get it accepted? I was unable to subscribe ubuntu-sru as I explained above, and this is normally a prerequisite. -- FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637131] Re: FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick
For some reason, I'm not able to subscribe ubuntu-sru, only ubtunu- sponsors. (There is no explanation with the error message that I'm given.) So I'm not able to complete the SRU process, and I really need someone from sponsors to look at the package I uploaded. I'm not 100% sure of what I'm doing so some guidance would be appreciated. -- FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637131] Re: FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick
I am using the SRU procedure as that should be attempted first. The bug impact is stated clearly in the description, when referencing #539008: prevents all non-plain ASCII working in all Mono WinForms apps owing to overly-broad name space grab. The bug has been addressed upstream and in maverick with 1:0.4.14-1. This involves changes to the font outlines, among other things, so I have created a minimal debdiff which is attached. This creates 1:0.4.13-5 which doesn't conflict with other Ubuntu releases. TEST CASE: A sample C# program demonstrating the program is included in #539008. This displays a dialog with umlauts, but when the bug is present the umlauts come out as boxes. I don't see any potential for regression as a result of this change. In fact, I think the newer package from maverick could be backported without regression, but SRU requires a minimal change so this is my attempt to provide it. I don't see the link for Nominate for release but I nominate it for lucid. I will attempt to upload the modified package. ** Changed in: thaifonts-scalable (Ubuntu Lucid) Status: Invalid = Confirmed ** Patch added: Debdiff of new package https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thaifonts-scalable/+bug/637131/+attachment/1720105/+files/thaifonts-scalable-0.4.13-4_0.4.13-5.debdiff -- FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637131] Re: FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick
Any chance of a backport to the LTS release? -- FFe: please sync 'thaifonts-scalable' 1:0.4.14-1 from sid-maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637131 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 658351] Re: Realtek card reader (device 5288) unusable on Dell Inspiron M301Z
I have the same problem on an HP mini 110-3000. The MeeGo bug report suggests that there is a vendor-supplied driver available as source, but I haven't been able to find it. -- Realtek card reader (device 5288) unusable on Dell Inspiron M301Z https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658351 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580687] [NEW] brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brightside Brightside installs its .desktop file to the wrong directory. It uses /usr/share/control-center-2.0/ which is obsolete and unused. The result is that brightside-properties doesn't show up in the menus anywhere. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brightside 1.4.0-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: c48372b45788f96938ae8861f1edc626 CheckboxSystem: abf102d6ef41328208f5c1554651535a Date: Fri May 14 13:41:16 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brightside ** Affects: brightside (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580687] Re: brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48461272/Dependencies.txt -- brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580694] [NEW] brightside has no GUI setting for autostarting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brightside Brightside needs to autostart on login but brightside-properties doesn't provide a setting for this. The user has to create an autostart item himself, using System - Preferences - Startup Applications - Add. It should instead copy a .desktop file to ~/.config/autostart. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: brightside 1.4.0-4 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.33-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686 NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx Architecture: i386 CheckboxSubmission: c48372b45788f96938ae8861f1edc626 CheckboxSystem: abf102d6ef41328208f5c1554651535a Date: Fri May 14 13:59:19 2010 ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brightside ** Affects: brightside (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- brightside has no GUI setting for autostarting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580694] Re: brightside has no GUI setting for autostarting
** Attachment added: Sample .desktop file for autostart http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48462727/brightside.desktop ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48462126/Dependencies.txt -- brightside has no GUI setting for autostarting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580694 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 580687] Re: brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus
It also puts a single bitmap icon in /usr/share/pixmaps/. It should instead copy the three icons it already has to the appropriate places in /usr/share/icons. -- brightside-properties isn't launchable from the menus https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580687 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 459532] Re: sugar-web-activity uninstallable due to python-xpcom dependency, should depend on xulrunner-1.9 instead
Version 103-0ubuntu1 depended on xulrunner-1.9, but the current version (108-2) has reverted to depending on python-xpcom. I have 103-0ubuntu1 installed, but can't upgrade, and the package keeps showing up as upgradable. -- sugar-web-activity uninstallable due to python-xpcom dependency, should depend on xulrunner-1.9 instead https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459532 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 24250] Re: Doesn't honor gnome proxy settings
MetaRelease.py (the Python code that does the check) uses urllib2 directly, and doesn't use the apt/synaptic settings. Although urllib2 looks at the environment variables for proxy settings, sudo zaps these for security reasons. I was able to make it work by using sudo -s to get a root shell, setting the environment variables, and then running update-manager. My squid access log shows that it fetched http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release. I believe this is a bug in MetaRelease.py, which should be changed to use the proxy settings from apt/synaptic. -- Doesn't honor gnome proxy settings https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/24250 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 466521] Re: update-manager ignores karmic
MetaRelease.py (the Python code that does the check for a new release) uses urllib2 directly, and doesn't use the apt/synaptic settings. Although urllib2 looks at the environment variables for proxy settings, sudo zaps these for security reasons. I was able to make it work by using sudo -s to get a root shell, setting the environment variables, and then running update-manager. My squid access log shows that it fetched http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release. I believe this is a bug in MetaRelease.py, which should be changed to use the proxy settings from apt/synaptic. -- update-manager ignores karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/466521 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 325706] Re: [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied
I can confirm that running the following command once enables sugar- emulator to work, so this is NOT a Xephyr problem: gconftool-2 -s /desktop/sugar/desktop/favorites_layout -t string ring- layout I will file a new bug against the sugar package, or add this information to an existing bug. -- [jaunty] Xephyr fails with D-Bus AccessDenied https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/325706 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382863] [NEW] [needs packaging] Upgrade to version 0.4
Public bug reported: There is a newer upstream release available (0.4) at https://sourceforge.net/projects/libwiimote/. This was released March 10, 2007, so should be pretty stable now. I was able to build it from source on jaunty, after applying debian/patches/01_fix_build.patch, although really configure.in needs to be patched as well. I have submitted a patch upstream that includes configure.in, and attached a copy here as well. Version 0.3 or better is needed for wiipresent, because it needs the function wiimote_pending. Current karmic version is 0.2. It would also be helpful to have this in Debian as well as Ubuntu. ** Affects: libwiimote (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [needs packaging] Upgrade to version 0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382863] Re: [needs packaging] Upgrade to version 0.4
** Attachment added: Replace deprecated hci_remote_name with hci_read_remote_name http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27423297/hci_remote_name.patch -- [needs packaging] Upgrade to version 0.4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382863 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341263] Re: Failure in generating pyc files when installing gedit-plugins
The problem appears to be that /usr/share/pyshared-data/gedit-plugins specifies python-version = 2.5, and python2.5 is not installed. When I install python2.5, the problem goes away. However, pycentral should handle this situation and not crash. Maybe gedit-plugins also needs to be updated to specify python2.6? Or just not specify a version, thereby getting the default? It has no direct package dependency on a python version, so it will presumably pick up the python version of whatever python add-on packages it depends on. Apart from this, jaunty has been very solid for me. Keep up the good work! -- Failure in generating pyc files when installing gedit-plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 342572] Re: pycentral crashed with AttributeError in install()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 341263 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341263 Apologies for submitting two reports for the same bug. I thought I had cancelled the submission of the other one. -- pycentral crashed with AttributeError in install() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341263] Re: Failure in generating pyc files when installing gedit-plugins
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23758293/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23758294/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23758295/ProcStatus.txt ** Attachment added: Traceback.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23758296/Traceback.txt ** Visibility changed to: Public -- Failure in generating pyc files when installing gedit-plugins https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341263 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341451] [NEW] Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace font
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic Synaptic is uses Monospace 10 by default, which is quite different to what I have set in System - Preferences - Appearance - Fonts. I can override this, of course, but when Use custom terminal font is unchecked synaptic should use the system setting. I believe a similar bug has been reported for gdebi. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 ExecutablePath: /usr/sbin/synaptic NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: synaptic 0.62.5ubuntu1 ProcAttrCurrent: unconfined ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: synaptic Uname: Linux 2.6.28-8-generic i686 ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace font https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 341451] Re: Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace font
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23766524/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23766525/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/23766526/ProcStatus.txt -- Synaptic terminal window does not use system monospace font https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341451 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307223] [NEW] Help button links to a non-existent web page
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: brightside The developer seems to have made the whole of his site closed, requiring a log-in. The help info for brightside should be made into a proper Gnome Help document. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 Package: brightside 1.4.0-1ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: PATH=:/home/username/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games:/Developer/Tools:/sbin:/usr/sbin LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: brightside Uname: Linux 2.6.27-10-generic i686 ** Affects: brightside (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Help button links to a non-existent web page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 307223] Re: Help button links to a non-existent web page
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20365667/Dependencies.txt -- Help button links to a non-existent web page https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/307223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
