[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks
The initramfs uses a different version of busybox to standard (in package busybox-initramfs) - located in /usr/lib/initramfs- tools/bin/busybox Running this version of busybox does exhibit the error on a normal server. Checking the config in the package it appears that CONFIG_FEATURE_TEST_64 is not set for the initramfs version. ** Summary changed: - growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks + growpart tickles overflow bug with big disks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/956870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks
** No longer affects: klibc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/956870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks
** Also affects: klibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags added: precise ** Also affects: busybox (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/956870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956870] [NEW] growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks
Public bug reported: If the number of blocks in a disk is greater than the maximum size of a signed 32-bit integer then growpart will fail in the initramfs. This is because the 'test' function in busybox gives the incorrect answer with large numbers. Since the busybox test function works fine under 'libc' when a server is booted, it looks like the root cause is a 32-bit overflow fault in klibc. To check for the problem, boot a server with a 'break init' option to force the initramfs to drop to a shell. (initramfs) [ 2117696 -gt 2147483647 ] (initramfs) echo $? 1 (initramfs) [ 2117696 -gt 2147483648 ] (initramfs) echo $? 0 ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: cloud-initramfs-growroot (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.29-generic 3.0.20 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 55cafa5b8b82ed224cc59d444cb1fc25 CheckboxSystem: 3e53d3ea5811723345f19eff5070f9ab Date: Fri Mar 16 11:05:07 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: cloud-initramfs-tools UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/956870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956870] Re: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956870 Title: growpart tickles overflow bug in klibc with big disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/956870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image
I've logged bug #956038 for the failure of resize2fs to check the maximum size of the filesystem. The workaround is to allocate the maximum number of resize blocks with: mkfs.ext4 -J size=128 -E resize=4294967295 -F tiny The '2^32-1' number is to workaround faults in older versions of 'mke2fs'. This is at a cost of about 29k blocks on the filesystem or about 11%. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs
The use case here is expansion of the root partition of a virtual machines from a small core image. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/956038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/956038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956038] [NEW] resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs
Public bug reported: If you resize a 1G partition to more than 1T the filesystem becomes corrupted offline and errors on-line. resize2fs does not check the maximum size of the filesystem before initiating the resize. To reproduce: $ dd if=/dev/zero of=tiny bs=1 count=0 seek=1G $ mkfs.ext4 -F -J size=128 tiny Maximum filesystem blocks=268435456 $ cp tiny xxl $ resize2fs xxl 1310720M resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) Resizing the filesystem on xxl to 335544320 (4k) blocks. The filesystem on xxl is now 335544320 blocks long. $ e2fsck xxl e2fsck 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) e2fsck: Group descriptors look bad... trying backup blocks... One or more block group descriptor checksums are invalid. Fix? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: e2fsprogs 1.41.14-1ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.29-generic 3.0.20 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 CheckboxSubmission: 55cafa5b8b82ed224cc59d444cb1fc25 CheckboxSystem: 3e53d3ea5811723345f19eff5070f9ab Date: Thu Mar 15 13:51:37 2012 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012) SourcePackage: e2fsprogs UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: e2fsprogs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric precise running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/956038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 956038] Re: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs
Similarly with online resizing: $ cp tiny xxl $ dd if=/dev/zero of=xxl bs=1 count=0 seek=1310720M $ sudo losetup /dev/loop0 xxl $ sudo e2fsck /dev/loop0 e2fsck 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) /dev/loop0: clean, 11/65536 files, 12635/262144 blocks $ sudo mount /dev/loop0 /mnt $ sudo resize2fs /dev/loop0 resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) Filesystem at /dev/loop0 is mounted on /mnt; on-line resizing required old_desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 80 Performing an on-line resize of /dev/loop0 to 335544320 (4k) blocks. resize2fs: Operation not permitted While trying to add group #8192 $ sudo umount /dev/loop0 $ sudo e2fsck /dev/loop0 e2fsck 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) /dev/loop0: clean, 11/67108864 files, 4220121/268435456 blocks With online resizing the filesystem fails to a consistent state at the maximum filesystem size. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/956038 Title: resize2fs allows resize beyond maximum fs size - corrupts fs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/956038/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image
Online resize still fails: ubuntu@srv-eej0z:~$ sudo resize2fs /dev/loop0 resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) Filesystem at /dev/loop0 is mounted on /mnt; on-line resizing required old_desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 80 Performing an on-line resize of /dev/loop0 to 335544320 (4k) blocks. resize2fs: Operation not permitted While trying to add group #8192 But the extended filesystem remains consistent when it does. The failure occurs at the maximum blocks that were shown when the original 1G filesystem was created. So perhaps all we need to do is catch the error and report that the maximum filesystem size has been reached. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image
Same problem on precise. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image
The workaround is to create a 128M journal via mkfs.ext4 -J size=128 which is the size of journal generally created on a 20G disk anyway. This costs 24k blocks (96M) on a 1G partition - which is about 10% of the free blocks available. When you do this Oneiric's resize2fs now appears to complete correctly (with a 1310720M partition). ubuntu@srv-xqubo:~$ resize2fs xxl resize2fs 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) Resizing the filesystem on xxl to 335544320 (4k) blocks. The filesystem on xxl is now 335544320 blocks long. But if you run e2fsck across that filesystem it is heavily corrupted. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
Yep, There's two bugs here. I'll make this one the 'resize' bug and raise another for the growpart failure once I've worked out what is going on there. My initial thoughts was to have cc_resize_fs.py check the existing filesystem to see what its limits were and then resize to the smaller of those limits or the partition size - rather than failing horribly. But it doesn't appear to be entirely trivial to work out what the maximum filesystem size is - even though mkfs.ext4 tells you when the filesystem is created. In my use case we've just launched terabyte disks on the Brightbox Cloud. Launching those with an ubuntu image created using default mkfs.ext4 parameters is what is causing these faults. (Note that they are not the standard images, but are built with live-build in a similar manner). ** Summary changed: - growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks + resize2fs fail with very large disks ** Summary changed: - resize2fs fail with very large disks + resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: resize2fs fail with very large disks from small source image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
>From https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/656115 "Note that we reserve enough GDT blocks so you can grow the filesystem by a factor of 1024 of the initial size." The source image is a 1G partition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
Similarly on precise: 2012-03-14 18:11:00,708 - __init__.py[DEBUG]: handling resizefs with freq=None and args=[] 2012-03-14 18:11:00,721 - cc_resizefs.py[DEBUG]: resizing root filesystem (type=ext4, maj=253, min=1) 2012-03-14 18:14:04,588 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: Failed to resize filesystem (['resize2fs', '/tmp/tmpN4o5Tg']) 2012-03-14 18:14:04,588 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: output=Filesystem at /tmp/tmpN4o5Tg is mounted on /; on-line resizing required old_desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 80 Performing an on-line resize of /tmp/tmpN4o5Tg to 335544292 (4k) blocks. error=resize2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) resize2fs: Operation not permitted While trying to add group #8192 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
2012-03-14 17:43:34,263 - cc_resizefs.py[DEBUG]: resizing root filesystem (type=ext4, maj=253, min=1) 2012-03-14 17:46:35,813 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: Failed to resize filesystem (['resize2fs', '/tmp/tmpjdcY6H']) 2012-03-14 17:46:35,813 - cc_resizefs.py[WARNING]: output=Filesystem at /tmp/tmpjdcY6H is mounted on /; on-line resizing required old desc_blocks = 1, new_desc_blocks = 80 Performing an on-line resize of /tmp/tmpjdcY6H to 335544312 (4k) blocks. error=resize2fs 1.41.14 (22-Dec-2010) resize2fs: Operation not permitted While trying to add group #8192 2012-03-14 17:46:35,874 - __init__.py[WARNING]: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/CloudConfig/__init__.py", line 108, in run_cc_modules cc.handle(name, run_args, freq=freq) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/CloudConfig/__init__.py", line 72, in handle [ name, self.cfg, self.cloud, cloudinit.log, args ]) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/__init__.py", line 309, in sem_and_run func(*args) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/CloudConfig/cc_resizefs.py", line 74, in handle (out,err) = util.subp(resize_cmd) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/cloudinit/util.py", line 148, in subp raise subprocess.CalledProcessError(sp.returncode,args, (out,err)) CalledProcessError: Command '['resize2fs', '/tmp/tmpjdcY6H']' returned non-zero exit status 1 2012-03-14 17:46:35,875 - __init__.py[ERROR]: config handling of resizefs, None, [] failed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
Package: cloud-initramfs-growroot 0.4ubuntu1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] Re: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
** Also affects: cloud-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 955272] [NEW] growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks
Public bug reported: I'm getting failures with growpart and resize2fs with very large disks. Above about 768Gb the online resizing in resize2fs fails - due to the lack of allocated blocks on the original filesystem. The maximum appears to be 201326592 blocks And with terabyte disks, the growpart command fails on boot - so the disk partition doesn't grow either. sfdisk seems to fail in someway. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: cloud-utils 0.25-0ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-virtual 3.2.9 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-virtual x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Wed Mar 14 17:16:32 2012 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: cloud-utils UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: cloud-initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: cloud-utils (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955272 Title: growpart and resize2fs fail with very large disks To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-initramfs-tools/+bug/955272/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937799] Re: ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise
http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2011/10/06/plans-for-1-8-7/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937799 Title: ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby1.8/+bug/937799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 937799] [NEW] ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise
Public bug reported: ruby1.8 is the default ruby for precise at the moment. 1.8.7 is supposed to drop out of support by the middle of 2013, and security updates are not going to happen. Which is a bit of a problem for a platform that is supposed to be supported through to 2017. Is there a way this can be handled. How is python obsolescence handled? Is 1.9 ready for the big time now? ** Affects: ruby1.8 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Package changed: ubuntu => ruby1.8 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/937799 Title: ruby1.8 is default ruby in precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby1.8/+bug/937799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Confirmed fixed on i686 with kernel 2.6.32-38-generic-pae #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 12:11:13 UTC 2012 i686 GNU/Linux Confirmed fixed on x86_64 with kernel 2.6.32-38-server #83-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jan 4 11:26:59 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux Many thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed-lucid ** Tags added: verification-done-lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Confirmed fixed on amd64 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Confirmed fixed on i386. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
Confirmed the package corrects the initial wizard failure allowing the program to start up correctly. Package purges and reinstalls correctly. Package upgrades from previous version correctly. Rerunning wizard from within the program works correctly. Good to go from my point of view. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
No Precise desktop equipment at the moment, but I do have Brightbox cloud which has a proper graphical console. One quick upgrade to 'ubuntu-desktop' later and I can confirm that kdenlive Config wizard works fine in Precise at the moment. Setting Precise task to invalid. This is an Oneiric only fault. ** Changed in: kdenlive (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: kdenlive (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 900234] Re: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise
The error is triggered due to the presence of the file '/sbin/dhclient3' and the lack of the directory '/var/lib/dhcp3'. So either we need to get rid of /sbin/dhclient3 or link /var/lib/dhcp3' to '/var/lib/dhcp'. Did this every get decided? ** Also affects: isc-dhcp (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900234 Title: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/900234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 900234] Re: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900234 Title: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/900234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 900234] [NEW] dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise
Public bug reported: Getting errors similar to the following in the syslog on Precise: Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: DHCPREQUEST of 10.251.70.10 on eth0 to 10.251.70.9 port 67 Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: DHCPACK of 10.251.70.10 from 10.251.70.9 Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases: No such file or directory Dec 5 10:47:44 srv-jygxu dhclient: bound to 10.251.70.10 -- renewal in 1299 seconds. This was apparently fixed on natty but appears to have regressed in Precise and Oneiric. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: ifupdown 0.7~alpha5.1ubuntu5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-2.6-virtual 3.2.0-rc3 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-2-virtual i686 ApportVersion: 1.90-0ubuntu1 Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Dec 5 10:59:50 2011 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: ifupdown UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 precise regression -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/900234 Title: dhclient: can't create /var/lib/dhcp3/dhclient.eth0.leases in syslog again on Precise To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/900234/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
SRU required in Oneiric. the package in the archive fails on start with a fresh install. See reviews in Software manager for user bad experience. The patch fixes the Config wizard so that the program will start properly from a fresh install. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
j^ Are you able to follow the process in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/HowToFix I'm struggling for time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
** Patch added: "kdenlive-newmlt.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+attachment/2618743/+files/kdenlive-newmlt.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
Creating the file above simply skips the config wizard. It doesn't fix the config wizard. Settings -> Run Config Wizard will still fail. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 363430] Re: "error, couldn't find SDL module from MLT, Kdenlive will not start untill you fix this"
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363430 Title: "error, couldn't find SDL module from MLT, Kdenlive will not start untill you fix this" To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/363430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 877311] Re: kdenlive does not runs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877311 Title: kdenlive does not runs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/877311/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 889788] Re: Kdenlive MTL SDL module not found
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889788 Title: Kdenlive MTL SDL module not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/889788/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 894840] Re: kdenlive does not start
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 899580 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 899580 "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894840 Title: kdenlive does not start To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/894840/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
This is due to compatibility error in with the MLT library in Oneiric You can workaround the problem by creating the file ~/.kde/share/config/kdenliverc with the contents [version] version=0.8 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] Re: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 899580] [NEW] "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric
Public bug reported: On a fresh install of kdenlive the configuration wizard will fail with MLT's SDL module not found. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: kdenlive 0.8-4build1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.20-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4 Architecture: amd64 Date: Sat Dec 3 12:57:35 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64 (20110921.2) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: kdenlive UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: kdenlive (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/899580 Title: "MLT's SDL module not found" on fresh install in Oneiric To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kdenlive/+bug/899580/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 893614] Re: grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893614 Title: grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/893614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 893614] [NEW] grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing
Public bug reported: grub-probe can fail with 'grub-probe: error: cannot stat `/dev/disk/by- uuid/`' if the mounted disk has had its UUID changed via 'tune2fs'. tune2fs caused the /dev/disk/by-uuid directory to update and the old link to be removed, but the entries in /proc/self/mountinfo have not been updated. This can cause fun and games when rebranding virtual machine disks created from images. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: grub2 1.99~rc1-13ubuntu3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-12.51-virtual 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-12-virtual x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Nov 22 14:51:07 2011 ProcEnviron: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: grub2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: grub2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/893614 Title: grub-probe fails if /dev/disk/by-uuid is missing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/893614/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674297] Re: gvim menus don't work properly on unity
After a while you get "WARNING **: Unable to register window with path '/com/canonical/menu/4200024': Timeout was reached " -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674297 Title: gvim menus don't work properly on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/674297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 674297] Re: gvim menus don't work properly on unity
I've got absolutely no menus having upgraded to Oneiric. Pointing at the top bar gives nothing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674297 Title: gvim menus don't work properly on unity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/674297/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890250] Re: Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package
** Description changed: This report is about the Maverick version of tasksel It looks like the Server task contains a package 'ubuntu-serverguide' which is ceased to exist after Lucid. ProblemType: Bug - DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 - Package: tasksel 2.88ubuntu3 - ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-12.51-generic 2.6.38.8 - Uname: Linux 2.6.38-12-generic x86_64 + + Architecture: amd64 - CheckboxSubmission: 55cafa5b8b82ed224cc59d444cb1fc25 - CheckboxSystem: 3e53d3ea5811723345f19eff5070f9ab Date: Mon Nov 14 14:22:44 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: - LANGUAGE=en_GB:en - PATH=(custom, user) - LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 - SHELL=/bin/bash + Â LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + Â PATH=(custom, user) + Â LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + Â SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: tasksel - UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-05-06 (192 days ago) ** Tags removed: natty ** Tags added: maverick ** Attachment removed: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tasksel/+bug/890250/+attachment/2596540/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890250 Title: Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tasksel/+bug/890250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890250] [NEW] Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package
Public bug reported: This report is about the Maverick version of tasksel It looks like the Server task contains a package 'ubuntu-serverguide' which is ceased to exist after Lucid. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Nov 14 14:22:44 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 "Karmic Koala" - Release amd64 (20091027) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron:  LANGUAGE=en_GB:en  PATH=(custom, user)  LANG=en_GB.UTF-8  SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: tasksel ** Affects: tasksel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick running-unity -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890250 Title: Server task in Maverick contains uninstallable 'ubuntu-serverguide' package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tasksel/+bug/890250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
I'm using live build to build virtual machines and I noticed this and I thought I'd report it as it was an easy fix. I was rather hoping to do what I wanted as an extension to the standard live-build, but that subsequently seems impossible so I've just forked the code for my purposes. On 8 November 2011 13:51, Colin Watson wrote: > Or rather (as I notice "chroot" here means the target system), it might > well be better-supported to use livecd-rootfs. Â I didn't really want to > expand the scope of the project that switched Ubuntu to live-build to > cover releases older than oneiric. > -- Neil Wilson -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3
Test build completed successfully. https://launchpad.net/~brightbox/+archive/experimental/+build/2906561 Can you sync 1.14.1-2 from Debian unstable which will give python3 bindings. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBFS with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3
On 4 November 2011 16:34, Scott Moser wrote: > 1.14.1-1 built in the archive for i386 and amd64 > > ** Changed in: libguestfs (Ubuntu) > Â Â Â Status: Confirmed => Fix Released > 1.14.1-2 supposedly fixes the python 3 bindings. Going to try a test build -- Neil Wilson -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBFS with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBFS with python 3
Upstream have some patches for Python 3. Hopefully Hilko can get those into the Debian package before Freeze. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBFS with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBS with python 3
** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #750889 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750889 ** Also affects: libguestfs (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750889 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - python bindings FTBS with python 3 + python bindings FTBFS with python 3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBFS with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #647402 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647402 ** Also affects: live-build (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647402 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884167] [NEW] All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image
Public bug reported: The server and virtual images appear to be missing the 'virtio_blk' and virtio_net' kernel modules. This breaks packages like 'libguestfs' which depend upon them to work. I can sort of understand virtual - not many people are nesting virtualisation, but server seems a bit strange. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: linux-image-virtual (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: User Name 2.6.38-12.51-generic 2.6.38.8 Uname: Linux 2.6.38-12-generic x86_64 AlsaDevices: total 0 crw--- 1 root root 116, 1 2011-10-31 10:35 seq crw--- 1 root root 116, 33 2011-10-31 10:35 timer AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Architecture: amd64 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/seq', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1: CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory CurrentDmesg: Date: Mon Oct 31 10:55:23 2011 IwConfig: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Red Hat KVM PciMultimedia: ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcKernelCmdLine: root=UUID=915dec8b-0198-43d0-a127-b369df73d40b ro quiet splash RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-12-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-12-generic N/A linux-firmware 1.52 RfKill: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Seabios dmi.bios.version: 0.5.1 dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Red Hat dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnSeabios:bvr0.5.1:bd01/01/2007:svnRedHat:pnKVM:pvrRHEL6.1.0PC:cvnRedHat:ct1:cvr: dmi.product.name: KVM dmi.product.version: RHEL 6.1.0 PC dmi.sys.vendor: Red Hat ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884167 Title: All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/884167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884167] Re: All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884167 Title: All virtio kernel modules should be in server/virtual image To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/884167/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884162] [NEW] missing dependency - requires virtio_blk kernel module
Public bug reported: libguestfs depends upon the virtio_blk kernel module to provide access to the underlying filesystems. This is only available in the 'linux- image-generic' image (or possibly linux-image-server on precise). It fails completely under 'linux-image-virtual' ** Affects: libguestfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884162 Title: missing dependency - requires virtio_blk kernel module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/884162/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu) Assignee: Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
** Patch added: "ubuntu-check-dpkg-version.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+attachment/2576453/+files/ubuntu-check-dpkg-version.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
** Changed in: live-build (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Neil Wilson (neil-aldur) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] Re: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 882670] [NEW] lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option
Public bug reported: The dpkg in the chroot (on a lucid build for example) might not be new enough to handle the 'unsafe-io' option set in the configuration file. lb_chroot_dpkg should check the chroot's dpkg capability first, e.g. Chroot chroot dpkg --force-help | grep -q unsafe-io ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: live-build 3.0~a24-1ubuntu17 [modified: usr/share/live/build/scripts/build/lb_bootstrap_cdebootstrap] ProcVersionSignature: User Name 3.0.0-12.20-virtual 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-virtual x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu3 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Oct 27 17:02:24 2011 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: live-build UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-10-14 (13 days ago) ** Affects: live-build (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug oneiric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882670 Title: lb_chroot_dpkg doesn't check dpkg version before setting 'unsafe-io' option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/live-build/+bug/882670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880386] Re: python bindings FTBS with python 3
** Summary changed: - python bindings don't work with python 3 + python bindings FTBS with python 3 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #646360 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646360 ** Also affects: libguestfs (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=646360 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings FTBS with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 880386] [NEW] python bindings don't work with python 3
Public bug reported: >From ubuntu ppa build (https://launchpadlibrarian.net/83488108 /buildlog_ubuntu-natty- amd64.libguestfs_1.12.8-1~natty1~ppa1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz) "Function `PyString_AsString' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py.c:56 Function `PyInt_FromLong' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py.c:616 Function `PyInt_FromLong' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py-byhand.c:171 Function `PyString_AsString' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py.c:56 Function `PyInt_FromLong' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py.c:616 Function `PyInt_FromLong' implicitly converted to pointer at ../../../python/guestfs-py-byhand.c:171 Our automated build log filter detected the problem(s) above that will likely cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64. This is often due to a missing function prototype definition. Since use of implicitly converted pointers is always fatal to the application on ia64, they are errors. Please correct them for your next upload. More information can be found at: http://wiki.debian.org/ImplicitPointerConversions"; The python binding code doesn't appear to be switching to the new interface spec for Python 3. ** Affects: libguestfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/880386 Title: python bindings don't work with python 3 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libguestfs/+bug/880386/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 667346] Re: [needs-packaging] sync package libguestfs from debian unstable
This package is now in Debian testing and Debian unstable, yet isn't in the Precise library yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/667346 Title: [needs-packaging] sync package libguestfs from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/667346/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Fault has been introduced by commit 5d5619b40c2474de01c64bdf6bb9f1211d3e967a https://github.com/mirrors/linux-2.6/commit/5d5619b40c2474de01c64bdf6bb9f1211d3e967a which fails to check the return value of 'err' and break out of the enclosing for loop. The fault is corrected during the refactoring on commit 234b27c3fd58fc0e15c04dd0fbf4337fac9c2a06 https://github.com/mirrors/linux/commit/234b27c3fd58fc0e15c04dd0fbf4337fac9c2a06 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Fixes backported to 2.6.32 ** Patch added: "0001-addrconf.c-Prevent-missing-IPv6-addresses.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2508136/+files/0001-addrconf.c-Prevent-missing-IPv6-addresses.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Running 'ip link del dummy01' moves the problem from dummy04 to dummy05 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
This fault can be shown more simply with the attached create dummies ruby script, which simply adds 16 IPv6 addresses to dummy interfaces. Running ./create-dummies.rb creates five dummy interfaces 'dummy01' to 'dummy05' each with 16 IPv6 addresses on them. Running 'ip addr show dev dummy04' and 'ifconfig dummy04' shows the problem on Lucid, but not on Natty. ** Attachment added: "create-dummies.rb" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2501383/+files/create-dummies.rb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742588 RHEL Bug ** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #742588 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742588 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
** Attachment added: "Looped bridge creator" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2487354/+files/create-bridges.rb -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Steps to replicate >From a clean booted Lucid server (cloud image or otherwise). sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get dist-upgrade sudo apt-get install bridge-utils dnsmasq-base ruby Install the attached files (bradd.sh, create-bridges.rb) in the home directory and run sudo ./create-bridges.rb 25 50 System will create bridges up to br25006e (the 28th bridge) and then fail with dnsmasq: no interface with address 2a02:1348:134:401b:24:19ff:fe25:6e You can start the sequence again with another set of bridges sudo ./create-bridges.rb 26 50 '26' is the prefix differentiator and '50' is the number of bridges you want. It doesn't appear to fail again. ** Attachment added: "Libvirt style network creator" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+attachment/2487353/+files/bradd.sh -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Later kernels don't appear to suffer this fault, but it is replicable on RHEL 6.x and derivatives, which uses the 2.6.32 kernel similarly. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
ip -o -6 addr show dev br25006e Will then return no entry, but ifconfig br25006e shows the ipv6 addresses as expected. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] Re: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 863394] [NEW] kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly.
Public bug reported: 2.6.32 has a problem with allocating IPv6 addresses that shows up using later versions of libvirt, or if you create lots of IPv6 addresses manually. What happens is that 'ip addr show dev' for a particular device fails to show the ipv6 addresses on them, yet they are there in the 'ifconfig' listing for that device. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: linux-image-2.6.32-34-generic-pae (not installed) Regression: Yes Reproducible: Yes ProcVersionSignature: User Name 2.6.32-34.77-generic-pae 2.6.32.44+drm33.19 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-34-generic-pae i686 AlsaDevices: Error: command ['ls', '-l', '/dev/snd/'] failed with exit code 2: ls: cannot access /dev/snd/: No such file or directory AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Architecture: i386 ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory Date: Fri Sep 30 14:59:29 2011 Lsusb: Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub MachineType: Red Hat KVM PciMultimedia: ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=7b800741-472f-463d-a00b-a5fcb724d796 ro quiet splash ProcEnviron: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: linux dmi.bios.date: 01/01/2007 dmi.bios.vendor: Seabios dmi.bios.version: 0.5.1 dmi.chassis.type: 1 dmi.chassis.vendor: Red Hat dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnSeabios:bvr0.5.1:bd01/01/2007:svnRedHat:pnKVM:pvrRHEL6.1.0PC:cvnRedHat:ct1:cvr: dmi.product.name: KVM dmi.product.version: RHEL 6.1.0 PC dmi.sys.vendor: Red Hat ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid needs-upstream-testing networking regression-release -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/863394 Title: kernel fails to notify IPv6 allocation correctly. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863394/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] PulseSinks.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseSinks.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480680/+files/PulseSinks.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] RfKill.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "RfKill.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480682/+files/RfKill.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] ProcCpuinfo.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480677/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] WifiSyslog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480685/+files/WifiSyslog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] UdevLog.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480684/+files/UdevLog.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] ProcModules.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480679/+files/ProcModules.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] UdevDb.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480683/+files/UdevDb.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] ProcInterrupts.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480678/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] PciMultimedia.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480676/+files/PciMultimedia.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Lspci.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480675/+files/Lspci.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] PulseSources.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "PulseSources.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480681/+files/PulseSources.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] IwConfig.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480674/+files/IwConfig.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] CurrentDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480673/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480672/+files/Card1.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480671/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.1.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480670/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Card0.Amixer.values.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480669/+files/Card0.Amixer.values.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] BootDmesg.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480668/+files/BootDmesg.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] ArecordDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ArecordDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480667/+files/ArecordDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] AplayDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "AplayDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480666/+files/AplayDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] AlsaDevices.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480665/+files/AlsaDevices.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] AcpiTables.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "AcpiTables.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136/+attachment/2480664/+files/AcpiTables.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Re: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address
You might want to try setting the dummy interface up in libvirt. That may workaround it for now at the expense of polluting the ifconfig listings. ** Patch added: "Start dummy bridge interface 'up' rather than 'down'" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+attachment/2480654/+files/Bring-up-dummy-interface.patch ** Tags added: apport-collected running-unity ** Description changed: When defining a network with an IPv6 address, libvirt fails to allocate the address properly and the launch of the supporting dnsmasq processes fails. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 Package: libvirt-bin 0.9.2-4ubuntu14 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 Date: Thu Sep 29 09:18:26 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64 (20110921.2) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: libvirt UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) modified.conffile..etc.libvirt.qemu.networks.default.xml: [deleted] + --- + AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.24. + ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu2 + Architecture: amd64 + AudioDevicesInUse: + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: neil 2331 F pulseaudio + CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory + Card0.Amixer.info: + Card hw:0 'SB'/'HDA ATI SB at 0xf000 irq 16' +Mixer name : 'Realtek ALC888' +Components : 'HDA:10ec0888,10250206,00100202 HDA:14f12c06,10250093,0010' +Controls : 29 +Simple ctrls : 17 + Card1.Amixer.info: + Card hw:1 'HDMI'/'HDA ATI HDMI at 0xcfdec000 irq 19' +Mixer name : 'ATI RS690/780 HDMI' +Components : 'HDA:1002791a,00791a00,0010' +Controls : 4 +Simple ctrls : 1 + Card1.Amixer.values: + Simple mixer control 'IEC958',0 +Capabilities: pswitch pswitch-joined penum +Playback channels: Mono +Mono: Playback [on] + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10 + HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=3eb700a5-a61d-459b-b56c-f9c2ae7687db + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Beta amd64 (20110921.2) + Lsusb: + Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub + Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub + Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub + MachineType: Acer Aspire 5536 + Package: linux (not installed) + ProcEnviron: + LANGUAGE=en_GB:en + LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 + SHELL=/bin/bash + ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.0.0-12-generic root=UUID=7320df77-82a4-40ca-8b60-71339a4c595b ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-12.19-generic 3.0.4 + RelatedPackageVersions: + linux-restricted-modules-3.0.0-12-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-3.0.0-12-generic N/A + linux-firmware1.60 + Tags: oneiric running-unity + Uname: Linux 3.0.0-12-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare + dmi.bios.date: 02/27/2009 + dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies LTD + dmi.bios.version: V1.03 + dmi.board.name: JV50PU + dmi.board.vendor: Acer + dmi.board.version: Rev + dmi.chassis.type: 10 + dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer + dmi.chassis.version: N/A + dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLTD:bvrV1.03:bd02/27/2009:svnAcer:pnAspire5536:pvr0100:rvnAcer:rnJV50PU:rvrRev:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrN/A: + dmi.product.name: Aspire 5536 + dmi.product.version: 0100 + dmi.sys.vendor: Acer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Re: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address
Possible patch here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/113174/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 862136] Re: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address
The dummy interface on the bridge is marked down in libvirt to prevent it showing up in the ifconfig listing. But that now also means it won't activate the bridge interface. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862136 Title: Can't define network with IPv6 address in libvirt - fails to define address To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/862136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
