[Bug 1306426] Re: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version
Actually not. It only means that it was compiled with NDEBUG defined. ** Changed in: pngquant (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426 Title: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pngquant/+bug/1306426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1306426] Re: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version
Or NDEBUG isn't defined :-) fprintf(fd, pngquant, %s, by Greg Roelofs, Kornel Lesinski.\n #ifndef NDEBUG DEBUG (slow) version.\n #endif But anyway, it's only a message. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426 Title: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pngquant/+bug/1306426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1306426] Re: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version
Right, the asserts :-) Good catch. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426 Title: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pngquant/+bug/1306426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1306426] Re: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version
It was fixed in Debian unstable. Thanks for spotting this, uqbar. ** Also affects: pngquant (Debian) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: pngquant (Debian) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426 Title: pngquant is distributed in SLOW (debug) version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pngquant/+bug/1306426/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 140504] Re: wish: category split for transaction
Maxime Doyen, will we be able to schedule a payment for split transactions? Example: I buy something with my credit card and it will be paid (split) for the next 10 months. For the next 10 months then we will have a total payment with this 1/10 of the bought thing already included on it. Will we be able to schedule this payment for the next 10 months? (a payment scheduled for a split transaction) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140504 Title: wish: category split for transaction To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/homebank/+bug/140504/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 783527] Re: Please update to latest upstream
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #645277 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645277 ** Also affects: sqsh (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645277 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783527 Title: Please update to latest upstream To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqsh/+bug/783527/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 806101] Re: JavaScript Mootools: ../javascript/mootools/mootools-more-nc.js in /usr/share/zoneminder/skins/classic/includes/functions.php Line 62, 63
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #635075 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635075 ** Also affects: zoneminder (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635075 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/806101 Title: JavaScript Mootools: ../javascript/mootools/mootools-more-nc.js in /usr/share/zoneminder/skins/classic/includes/functions.php Line 62,63 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zoneminder/+bug/806101/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 770768] Re: gdpc version 2.2.5-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric
Actually it doesn't fail to build, but gives only a warning at the end: = Function `gdk_gc_new' implicitly converted to pointer at drawatoms.c:63 Our automated build log filter detected the problem(s) above that will likely cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64. This is often due to a missing function prototype definition. Since use of implicitly converted pointers is always fatal to the application on ia64, they are errors. Please correct them for your next upload. More information can be found at: http://wiki.debian.org/ImplicitPointerConversions = -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/770768 Title: gdpc version 2.2.5-1 failed to build on amd64 with GCC-4.6/oneiric -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 668094] Re: Cant install imagemagick- says already installed not opening
Hi! Note that there is no imagemagick command. The binaries available from the imagemagick package are: /usr/bin/import /usr/bin/conjure /usr/bin/compare /usr/bin/convert /usr/bin/mogrify /usr/bin/composite /usr/bin/display /usr/bin/stream /usr/bin/identify /usr/bin/animate /usr/bin/montage Try a simple test to see if imagemagick is working: display somepicture.jpg If it displays the picture, then it's properly installed. -- Cant install imagemagick- says already installed not opening https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/668094 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 604477] [NEW] [MIR] gnome-exe-thumbnailer, imagemagick, icoutils
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Scott Ritchie scottritc...@ubuntu.com wrote: In terms of file size, gnome-exe-thumbnailer is about 150k, imagemagick is 100k, and icoutils is 200k, for a combined CD impact of just under half a megabyte. Note that imagemagick also depends on libmagickwand3 (compressed package size of ~350K) and libmagickcore3 (compressed size of 1.7M). -- [MIR] gnome-exe-thumbnailer, imagemagick, icoutils https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573715] Re: Missing --enable-hdri
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- Missing --enable-hdri https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 408119] Re: Merge imagemagick 7:6.6.0.4-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)
Since the SVG coder is on libmagickcore3-extra, do you really need to keep diverging the package from our (Debian) version and not build- depending on librsvg? -- Merge imagemagick 7:6.6.0.4-2 (main) from Debian testing (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408119 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 367170] Re: tracker / odt2txt get stuck when OpenOffice file has German special character
On my Debian unstable system, odt2txt properly works with the attached file. With pt_BR.UTF-8, de_DE and de_DE.UTF-8 I can see Voß without any problems (running both odt2txt odt2txt_bugreport_example.ods and odt2txt --raw odt2txt_bugreport_example.ods). With LC_ALL=C I see Voss instead Voß (but it doesn't hang nor give any error message). Which locale are you using, please? -- tracker / odt2txt get stuck when OpenOffice file has German special character https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/367170 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 573715] Re: Missing --enable-hdri
Take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/465526 to see why we have disabled HDRI support in ImageMagick. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #465526 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465526 -- Missing --enable-hdri https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573715 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 514697] Re: Broken libmagick Package in Update Repository
Not a problem in imagemagick. But try to remove /var/cache/apt/archives/libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb (it's inoffensive to remove the file), apt-get update (or aptitude update, or use Synaptic, etc) and do your upgrade process again. -- Broken libmagick Package in Update Repository https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/514697 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 430634] Re: mogrify -flatten mentioned in manpage but not recognised
What is the output of mogrify -version, please? -- mogrify -flatten mentioned in manpage but not recognised https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430634 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370756] Re: Tracker and odt2txt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366961 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366961 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 366961 odt2txt starts automaticly, using 23% cpu doing nothing, after closing files -- Tracker and odt2txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370756 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 366961] Re: odt2txt starts automaticly, using 23% cpu doing nothing, after closing files
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chris Cheneycche...@ubuntu.com wrote: This is probably related to tracker indexing all of your files. Then reassign it to tracker, please. -- odt2txt starts automaticly, using 23% cpu doing nothing, after closing files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366961 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 370756] Re: Tracker and odt2txt
Almost sure that this is a problem in Tracker. -- Tracker and odt2txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370756 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 371791] [NEW] Ubuntu 9.04: ImageMagick incompatible with updated UFRaw
Hi! On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, hillwanderer twoblogs@googlemail.com wrote: When I try running the identify command on DNG files, I get messages about PPM16 being deprecated. It looks as if the version of ImageMagick that is included is not compatible with the version of UFRaw and so is sending it an incorrect call. A new version of ImageMagick may address this issue. Can you attach or put it available somewhere some DNG files to we test, please? Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- Ubuntu 9.04: ImageMagick incompatible with updated UFRaw https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 350154] Re: [needs packaging] Imagemagick 6.5.0
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 348862 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348862 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 348862 Ubuntu 9.04: Expecting an important patch for ImageMagick. -- [needs packaging] Imagemagick 6.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 351743] Re: Convert goes into infinite malloc loop while converting buggy djvu files
Confirmed and forwarded to http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3t=13441 Thanks! ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Convert goes into infinite malloc loop while converting buggy djvu files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351743 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 348862] Re: Ubuntu 9.04: Expecting an important patch for ImageMagick.
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:25 AM, moma osm...@online.no wrote: The current ImageMagick version in Jauntu is 6.4.5. It is BUGGY and HOPLESSLY old. Even the latest version is buggy. That is why upstream keeps releasing new versions. Ubuntu users have hard time when participating on the ImageMagick forums because Ubuntu's IM version is ancient, old and relatively buggy. People don't want to suppport old, buggy versions! Actually the upstream authors are very friendly and comprehensive. Even with old releases they try to help. Sorry to say this, but Ubuntu is practically useless for work with ImageMagick. Then sorry. Try to find another program and another package that fill you needs. The ImageMagick package in Ubuntu is based on our package from Debian (and our work is voluntary). We don't have 24 hours per day to keep ungrateful users happy all the time. Best regards, Nelson (the one who maintains OLD and BUGGY ImageMagick releases in Debian) -- Ubuntu 9.04: Expecting an important patch for ImageMagick. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348862 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 350154] [NEW] [needs packaging] Imagemagick 6.5.0
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Giovanni Condello condel...@gmail.com wrote: Imagemagick 6.5.0 should packaged in Jaunty, since our version is 80+ patches old. One bug, for instance, is this: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1105865 (error while rotating a simple .gif) Yes, we all know. Somebody already said the SAME things in https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+bug/348862 There may also be security vulnerabilities related to not upgrading the package. There aren't known security issues for now. Best regards, Nelson -- [needs packaging] Imagemagick 6.5.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350154 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296798] Re: OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to array-overflow attacks)
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0749 -- OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to array-overflow attacks) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297440] Re: Sync optipng from Debian unstable
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0749 -- Sync optipng from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 268096] Re: mogrify says No decode delegate for this image format
Hi! Is it possible to you also send me the file that triggers this problem, please? (north_berwick_colin_murray.jpg) You can send me privately if you prefer. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- mogrify says No decode delegate for this image format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 302102] Re: CVE-2008-1096
** Attachment added: Patch for CVE-2008-1096 http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19939414/CVE-2008-1096.patch ** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-1096 ** Visibility changed to: Public -- CVE-2008-1096 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302102 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297440] Re: Sync optipng from Debian unstable
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-5101 -- Sync optipng from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296798] Re: OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to vulnerable to array-overflow attacks)
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-5101 -- OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to vulnerable to array-overflow attacks) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297440] [NEW] Sync optipng from Debian unstable
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: Binary package hint: optipng Hi! I have upload a new version of optipng to Debian unstable, fixing a security vulnerability (Secunia Advisory SA32651). Changes from 0.6.1-2 (jaunty) are small (see http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2008/11/msg00413.html). Note that version 0.6-1 (from intrepid) is also vulnerable. Thank you! ** Affects: optipng (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Visibility changed to: Public -- Sync optipng from Debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297440 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 159428] Re: import -border ignores borders
hardy and intrepid both have the same version of ImageMagick (so probably you will see the same problem if you update your system). Even using version 6.4.5.4 (Debian experimental) it seems that the problem is still there. I will take a better look at it (and forward upstream, if necessary). ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- import -border ignores borders https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/159428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 13516] Re: imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails
There is a workaround and upstream won't fix this: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2t=12355sid=54308c34dfbb41b6ec97646d91bb788cp=40757#p40757 -- imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13516 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189588] Re: Miro crashed in beta of Ubuntu 8.04.
Can I take a look at the .psd that made it crash, please? (as if I am not wrong, it's calling convert file.psd xmp:- -- Miro crashed in beta of Ubuntu 8.04. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 268248] Re: hardy: imagemagick installation from repository leaves unresolved dependency
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:48 AM, eniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unpacking libmagick10 (from .../libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1_i386.deb) ... dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1_i386.deb (--unpack): short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/ImageMagick-6.3.7/modules-Q16/coders/png.so') Almost sure that this problem isn't with imagemagick. However when I do: sudo aptitude show libmagic10 The output is: E: Unable to locate package libmagic10 There is a typo. It's libmagick10 and not libmagic10. Best regards, Nelson -- hardy: imagemagick installation from repository leaves unresolved dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268248 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 43323] Re: imagemagick display show wrong dimensions for JPEGs in visual image directories.
Fixed upstream: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse- server/viewtopic.php?f=3t=12036 -- imagemagick display show wrong dimensions for JPEGs in visual image directories. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43323 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 268096] Re: mogrify says No decode delegate for this image format
What is the version of ImageMagick that you are using, please? (you can use dpkg -l imagemagick) -- mogrify says No decode delegate for this image format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268096 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff
Indeed ImageMagick depends on X stuff (you can see http://bugs.debian.org/470671 and also our TODO list at http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gmagick/branches/experimental/debian/TODO?op=filerev=0sc=0). It somebody wants to help us in getting a new ImageMagick without X dependencies, we can be reached at [EMAIL PROTECTED] :-) ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188773] Re: please merge imagemagick 7:6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental (main)
Hi! The fixed version (with parallel building) is available on Debian experimental. About the fix for bug #178575, I will take a look at it (but I can't promise that it will be fast) You can search for this fix using http://trac.imagemagick.org/browser/ImageMagick; I know that it has been fixed on version 6.3.9-1 (http://www.mail-archive.com/magick- [EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg00544.html) so it should make things easier to compare this version against a previous buggy one. -- please merge imagemagick 7:6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 263722] Re: ImageMagick-6.4.3 installation problem
The user is trying to install ImageMagick by hand (and not using the distro package). ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** bug changed to question: https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+question/43857 -- ImageMagick-6.4.3 installation problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263722 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 188773] Re: please merge imagemagick 7:6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental (main)
debian/patches/use-only-one-the.patch isn't necessary for version 6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1 The parallel building is broken on the buildds (but it works on my machine). I need to investigate (see http://bugs.debian.org/496212). About syncing it, probably you will have the same problem as us on Debian. Some packages will FTBFS with the new ImageMagick (I have sent patches on Debian BTS) and others will need to change the build-dependencies. It isn't an easy transition. -- please merge imagemagick 7:6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1 from Debian experimental (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/188773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 111238] Re: Grammatical error in Keyboard Message Dialog
I have already forwarded a patch fixing all the duplicated words that I have found. See: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3t=11764sid=f83fd4d2ed8cf34c856007535cf944c3 It's already fixed upstream (and on Debian experimental). -- Grammatical error in Keyboard Message Dialog https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111238 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 59908] Re: identify command requires mpeg2decode
Hi! On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Adam Williamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No modern, F/OSS encoder that I've found seems to be able to understand .par files. They all expect you to just feed them a series of images direct on the command line, which is a completely different system. So to migrate ImageMagick from mpeg2encode to something modern you'd have to substantially change mpeg.c to just feed out a series of YUV images, not write a .par file, and call the delegate properly, *then* change the delegate from mpeg2encode to mpeg2enc or ffmpeg or mencoder or whatever you want to use. Unfortunately, my (non-existent) C skills don't extend to that, really, though I may give it a bash. We can discuss this with upstream. At least from my experience, they are very responsive and open to talk about problems, suggestions, etc. Best regards, Nelson -- identify command requires mpeg2decode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250835] Re: pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Hi! I have uploaded a new revision to Debian, so you can sync from it now :-) Best regards, Nelson -- pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250835] Re: pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #491860 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491860 ** Also affects: pngnq (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491860 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250798] Re: Imagemagick: identify -format %[EXIF:string] yields nothing
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 227631 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227631 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 227631 identify reports every single EXIF tag as empty -- Imagemagick: identify -format %[EXIF:string] yields nothing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250798 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 250927] Re: Segfault when running 'pngnq -V'
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 250835 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 250835 pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() -- Segfault when running 'pngnq -V' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250927 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 250835] Re: pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
Hi! On 7/22/08, Cesare Tirabassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks for reporting this, since the fix is quite trivial I'd suggest we wait until this is fixed by debian and sync. If this will not be done before freeze we will make it as an ubuntu specific change. I will be able to upload a fixed revision to Debian only on Saturday. Probably the freeze won't happen before Saturday, right? :-) Best regards, Nelson -- pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203023] Re: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20060613/imagick.so' - libWand.so.9
php-imagick needs to be rebuilt, not a problem with imagemagick. ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #459874 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459874 ** Also affects: php-imagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459874 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20060613/imagick.so' - libWand.so.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is a bug assignee. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 221857] Re: imagemagick convert -composite option not working
Actually not a bug. ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- imagemagick convert -composite option not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 219725] Re: Installation erros while trying to install support packages for rmagick support for rails.
Duplicated of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphicsmagick/+bug/246489; already fixed. ** Changed in: graphicsmagick (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: imagemagick = graphicsmagick Status: New = Fix Released -- Installation erros while trying to install support packages for rmagick support for rails. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/219725 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 47503] Re: ImageMagick conversion problem (GIF89a-MPEG)
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #455801 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801 ** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- ImageMagick conversion problem (GIF89a-MPEG) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/47503 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203023] Re: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20060613/imagick.so' - libWand.so.9
php-imagick needs to be rebuilt, not a problem with imagemagick. ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #459874 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459874 ** Also affects: php-imagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459874 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library '/usr/lib/php5/20060613/imagick.so' - libWand.so.9 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203023 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 227631] Re: identify reports every single EXIF tag as empty
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #473529 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473529 ** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473529 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- identify reports every single EXIF tag as empty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227631 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 246489] Re: package libmagick9-dev 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc', which is also in package graphicsmagick-libmagick-d
It's not a problem with apt-get nor with aptitude. We have fixed this bug on Debian with graphicsmagick version 1.1.11-2: * debian/control: ImageMagick's -dev packages have stopped providing virtual, unversioned aliases, recently. Add explicit Conflicts and Replaces on the versioned package names libmagick9-dev and libmagick++9-dev in the -compat-dev package. Closes: #476584 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #476584 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476584 ** Also affects: graphicsmagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=476584 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: graphicsmagick (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- package libmagick9-dev 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/pkgconfig/ImageMagick.pc', which is also in package graphicsmagick-libmagick-dev-compat https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/246489 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 224998] Re: sim on kde4 not show icons
Reassigning to sim ** Changed in: sim (Ubuntu) Sourcepackagename: sim4 = sim -- sim on kde4 not show icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224998 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221857] Re: imagemagick convert -composite option not working
Hi! Are you sure that it was working with version 6.2.4.5? I have tested it here and it outputs the same message, even with Debian's 6.4.0.9 I couldn't find something similar at http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/ (using convert input1 -composite input2 -composite outpt) Using convert image_1.jpg image_2.jpg -composite output.jpg it works as expected. Best regards, Nelson -- imagemagick convert -composite option not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 221857] Re: imagemagick convert -composite option not working
Hi! On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Yuzem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have tested it here and it outputs the same message, even with Debian's 6.4.0.9 I couldn't find something similar at http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/ (using convert input1 -composite input2 -composite outpt) Here: http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/layers/#convert If you look at the examples, you will see that they have this format: convert input1 input2 -composite (inputn -composite)* output For two images it would be: convert input1 input2 -composite output For 3 images: convert input1 input2 -composite input3 -composite output Lets use this example: convert -size 100x100 xc:skyblue \ balloon.gif -geometry 40x40+5+10 -composite \ medical.gif -geometry +35+30 -composite \ present.gif -geometry 24x24+62+50 -composite \ shading.gif -geometry 16x16+10+55 -composite \ compose_resize.gif xc:skyblue is also an image (an all blue). it seems that it's still valid what I said before. Best regards, Nelson -- imagemagick convert -composite option not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221857 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 59908] Re: identify command requires mpeg2decode
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #455801 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801 ** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- identify command requires mpeg2decode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59908 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 30292] Re: composite doesn't
This bug has been fixed on ImageMagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 on Debian (7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 on Ubuntu). ** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- composite doesn't https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30292 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 199418] Re: imagemagick depends on x stuff
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #470671 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470671 ** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470671 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- imagemagick depends on x stuff https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/199418 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110178] Re: Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
OK Uploaded to unstable: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imagemagick/news/20080213T030203Z.html A rebuild of the packages showed that two will fail to build with the new version of imagemagick: dx and vips. -- Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110178] Re: Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
Because there is a soname bump, and we need to ask and coordinate about this transition with the Debian release team. -- Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 110178] Re: Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
Hi! Actually imagemagick isn't available on unstable. We have uploaded to experimental :-) -- Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110178 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136973] Re: [FTBFS] gdpc
I can confirm this on Debian, with libgtk2.0-0 from experimental (version 2.11.6, while with version 2.10.13 it builds without any problem). Will it helps if I upload a new revision to Debian and then you sync it to Ubuntu? -- [FTBFS] gdpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136973] Re: [FTBFS] gdpc
I am working on it ** Changed in: gdpc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Nelson A. de Oliveira Status: New = In Progress -- [FTBFS] gdpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 136973] Re: [FTBFS] gdpc
Hi! I have uploaded a new revision to Debian. In about 3 to 4 hours it should be available on Debian mirrors (and then it can be synced to Ubuntu). Best regards, Nelson ** Changed in: gdpc (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- [FTBFS] gdpc https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 75557] Re: instal python-uno broken: /usr/bin/pycentral::default_runtime.remove_byte_code() : 'NoneType' object
Argh... sorry for the click on this button :-/ It doesn't affect OpenOffice. Sorry ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #409225 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409225 ** Also affects: python-central (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409225 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- instal python-uno broken: /usr/bin/pycentral::default_runtime.remove_byte_code() : 'NoneType' object https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 32234] Re: pngcrush not compiled with itxt or text support
We fixed this bug on Debian with pngcrush 1.6.4-2. Nelson -- pngcrush not compiled with itxt or text support https://launchpad.net/bugs/32234 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
