[Bug 1751278] Re: dbgsym packages are generated iff DH_BUILD_DDEBS is set
Michael Prokop:
> Public bug reported:
>
> A user trying to rebuild a Debian package of us ran into the problem
> that he didn't get debug packages any longer. (The original bug report
> and discussion around it is available at
> https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/459 )
>
> In Ubuntu's debhelper changelog I found:
>
> debhelper (9.20160115ubuntu2) xenial; urgency=medium
>
> * dh-strip: Adjust reversion of commit f1a803456 to account for the recent
> ENABLE_DDEBS → ENABLE_DBGSYM rename. This actually disables -dbgsym
> generation by dh_strip by default again. (LP: #1535949)
>
> This matches what's documented under the "Ubuntu" section at
> https://wiki.debian.org/AutomaticDebugPackages
> This doesn't seem to really match what's documented in Ubuntu's dh_strip
> manpage though:
>
>--automatic-dbgsym, --no-automatic-dbgsym
>Control whether dh_strip should be creating debug symbol packages
> when possible.
>
>The default is to create debug symbol packages.
>
> In Ubuntu's dh_strip implementation I stumbled upon:
>
> $dh{ENABLE_DBGSYM} = 0 if not $ENV{'DH_BUILD_DDEBS'};
>
> So only if DH_BUILD_DDEBS is set then dbgsym packages are generated, and
> indeed this has been verified by the original bug reporter on Ubuntu
> Server 16.04.3 LTS.
>
> So the documentation seems to be wrong/incomplete. Probably it would
> also make sense to switch the default around, to by default
> automatically generate the dbgsym packages, so that users get a more
> consistent behavior. You could then force it to off on Ubuntu's build
> daemons instead, if that's relevant.
>
> ** Affects: debhelper (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Status: New
>
Side-note: I believe this has been fixed in Artful or Bionic as Ubuntu
has migrated to use the debhelper based dbgsym packages (with only a
minor difference in the filename extension). I remember it as Artful
(but the reference eludes me at the moment and I am too lazy to check).
Thanks,
~Niels
** Bug watch added: github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues #459
https://github.com/sipwise/rtpengine/issues/459
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1751278
Title:
dbgsym packages are generated iff DH_BUILD_DDEBS is set
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1751278/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1767792] Re: dh_installxfonts creates wrong dependency
Andrew Bird: > Public bug reported: > > The debhelper shipped with 18.04 contains a typo that generates the wrong > dependency when using dh_installxfonts in a package build. There is already a > patch from the developer that introduced the typo available in Debian > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894835 > The effect of this bug can be seen when trying to install a PPA package built > in the build farm. See > https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/issues/597#issuecomment-385178269 for a user > report > > ** Affects: debhelper (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > ** Summary changed: > > - dh_installxfonts creates wrong dependancy > + dh_installxfonts creates wrong dependency > Hi, Upstream patch that fixes the bug: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/debhelper/commit/98d248f46b6085d691aa29c423fa9fa2e240709a (Should be trivial to cherry-pick). Thanks, ~Niels ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #894835 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894835 ** Bug watch added: github.com/stsp/dosemu2/issues #597 https://github.com/stsp/dosemu2/issues/597 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1767792 Title: dh_installxfonts creates wrong dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1767792/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1766102] Re: dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0
Dan Kegel: > (Right... that's why I linked to that bug. Apologies; I just hit reply when I saw the subject. I had not seen you had already referenced relevant upstream bug. :) Thanks, ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766102 Title: dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1766102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1766102] Re: dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #894895 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894895 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766102 Title: dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1766102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1766102] [NEW] dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0
Dan Kegel: > Public bug reported: > > If the package's debian/changelog has a first line with version 0, > dh_installchangelogs fails with > > dh_installchangelogs: changelog parse failure > > This is fixed upstream, see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi- > bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=894895 > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 > Package: debhelper 11.1.6ubuntu1 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-119.143-generic 4.4.114 > Uname: Linux 4.4.0-119-generic x86_64 > ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu6 > Architecture: amd64 > Date: Sun Apr 22 16:31:02 2018 > PackageArchitecture: all > SourcePackage: debhelper > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > > ** Affects: debhelper (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > > ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic > Hi, This should have been fixed in debhelper/11.2 as a part of https://bugs.debian.org/894895. Thanks, ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766102 Title: dh_installchangelogs fails if version is 0 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1766102/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1764564] [NEW] dh_clean no longer deletes debian/files
David Lechner: > Public bug reported: > > According to the dh_clean man page, dh_clean "removes some other files > including debian/files". In xenial, this was indeed the case. However, > since I have upgraded to bionic, debian/files is no longer being > deleted, for example, when I run debuild -S -us -uc to build a package. > > ProblemType: Bug > DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04 > Package: debhelper 11.1.6ubuntu1 > ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-13.14-generic 4.15.10 > Uname: Linux 4.15.0-13-generic x86_64 > NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia > ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu4 > Architecture: amd64 > CurrentDesktop: GNOME > Date: Mon Apr 16 18:24:46 2018 > InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-05-13 (1799 days ago) > InstallationMedia: This > PackageArchitecture: all > SourcePackage: debhelper > UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) > > ** Affects: debhelper (Ubuntu) > Importance: Undecided > Status: New > > > ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic > As I recall, this is not because dh_clean does not remove the file but because dpkg-source generates the file on a -S build now (after running dh_clean). Thanks, ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764564 Title: dh_clean no longer deletes debian/files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1764564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1712817] Re: postinst fails if the service is disabled via systemd
Robie Basak: > Based on https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/04/13/%23ubuntu- > devel.html#t11:56, this sounds valid for either init-system-helpers or > debhelper. > > 13:47 rbasak, the description sounds valid. i believe i have hit > something similar before, thus yeah a fix to debhelper for this class of > issues would be most welcomed. > > 13:47 xnox: thanks. debhelper, or invoke-rc.d? > > 13:48 rbasak, my understanding was that maintainer scripts that > are generated, do attempt to check if a thing was "enabled and active" > before the upgrade; and post upgrade. But maybe they only do so for > systemd native units, and not for init.d->systemd units. > > > ** Also affects: debhelper (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided >Status: New > Hi, Possibly related to this issue: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887904#10 Thanks, ~Niels ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #887904 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=887904 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1712817 Title: postinst fails if the service is disabled via systemd To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1712817/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1554979] Re: dh_install --exclude flag not working
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #814856 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814856 ** Also affects: debhelper via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814856 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554979 Title: dh_install --exclude flag not working To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debhelper/+bug/1554979/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1675340] Re: dh_fixperms unsets X permission to node.js scripts
Sorry, misread the bug and unfortunately it seems I cannot undo the fact that bug is closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675340 Title: dh_fixperms unsets X permission to node.js scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1675340/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1675340] Re: dh_fixperms unsets X permission to node.js scripts
This was fixed in debhelper/10.9 (per https://bugs.debian.org/840913), which is available in Bionic. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #840913 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840913 ** Also affects: debhelper via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840913 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** No longer affects: debhelper -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675340 Title: dh_fixperms unsets X permission to node.js scripts To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1675340/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1697120] Re: artful's apt-file complains about Ubuntu sources.list
The actual warning is from apt and not apt-file. It occurs because multiple "fetch" directive refer to the same file, but they come from different lines in the apt sources.list. As noted (see #1579372), a long term fix would be to provide the Contents in the "per component" location on the archive. Short term fix is to merge the sources.list lines. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1697120 Title: artful's apt-file complains about Ubuntu sources.list To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1697120/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1654703] Re: /usr/share/doc/fig2dev/CHANGES.gz is a broken symlink
This looks like it is caused by the Ubuntu specific changes to dh_installchangelogs. Namely, the original debhelper will look for (among other) "CHANGES" as an upstream changelog. Ubuntu have removed this to save disk space and leads to debhelper picking "changelog" as a candidate for the "main package" (and nothing for others). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1654703 Title: /usr/share/doc/fig2dev/CHANGES.gz is a broken symlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/1654703/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 730622] Re: no way to specify all architectures
Hi, Can you give a case where it would be useful to ask debhelper to build a package for an architecture, where it is not supported (as declared by the maintainer)? The only case I can come up with is that the Architecture field is wrong/out of date. Though in this case, the proper solution would be to update the Architecture field. ** Changed in: debhelper (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730622 Title: no way to specify all architectures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debhelper/+bug/730622/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641283] Re: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable. The remaining Ubuntu delta is unnecessary since the downloading of Contents files have been delegated to APT and configured to look both in the Debian and the Ubuntu locations. Thanks, -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283 Title: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1641283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1623256] Re: adjust the way to create dbgsym packages like Debian does
Not sure if this is still relevant, but ... If you are going to make debhelper use ".ddeb" rather than ".deb" for dbgsym packages (and dpkg doesn't DTRT), I strongly recommend relying on the "build_and_rename_deb" sub in dh_builddeb rather than computing the filename yourself. Otherwise, "dh_gencontrol -- -V $(VERSION)" is going to be needlessly painful (like it was with udebs). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1623256 Title: adjust the way to create dbgsym packages like Debian does To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1623256/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641283] Re: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
argh, I meant 3.1.3. Silly me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283 Title: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1641283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641283] Re: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
Hi Hans, With my upstream hat on, I believe that delta is redundant thanks to changes in apt and apt-file. I do not remember the exact apt-file version that solves it, but I can dig it up if it is relevant (it is definitely prior to 3.1.4). Also, I typoed the version; I meant please sync apt-file/3.1.4 (will fix the bug description) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283 Title: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1641283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516129] Re: lintian error code 1 on dist-upgrade
This is definitely fixed in lintian/2.5.13, where lintian relies on libc to provide C.UTF-8 rather than generating an en_US.UTF-8. ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516129 Title: lintian error code 1 on dist-upgrade To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/516129/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1263222] Re: rapt-file search not works
In the mean time, rapt-file has been discontinued as the back end service has stopped working. I suspect this bug ought to be closed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1263222 Title: rapt-file search not works To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1263222/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1296128] Re: Can't search cross-architecture
apt-file 3 should support this provided you configure apt to fetch the Contents files for armhf. Admittedly, this is waiting for #1641283 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1296128 Title: Can't search cross-architecture To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1296128/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641283] Re: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
AFAICT, this would fix at least: * #1296128 * #888316 * #817517 * #767061 * #567895 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283 Title: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1641283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1641283] [NEW] Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: Please update the apt-file version in Ubuntu to apt-file/3.1.3. ** Affects: apt-file (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1641283 Title: Please sync apt-file from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt-file/+bug/1641283/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1303603] Re: bad-distribution-in-changes-file unstable
On 2014-11-12 11:56, Rolf Leggewie wrote: I think this needs further discussion, then. Hi Rolf, Thanks for your interest in this matter. Please note that my remarks here are from the perspective of Lintian upstream and /not/ Ubuntu. Quite obviously, the current setup goes against the expectations of many users. Unfortunately, it is not clear to me that this is as obvious and clear-cut as you suggest it to be. The current way Lintian finds the default profile is: 1) On $DISTRO, Lintian defaults to the $DISTRO profile. - if said profile is present, stop here! 2) Try from 1) again with DISTRO=$(parentof $DISTRO) if there is a parent distribution of $DISTRO 3) Abort. Since both Debian and Ubuntu has a profile, we get (simplified): * On Ubuntu, Lintian defaults to the Ubuntu profile. * On Debian, Lintian defaults to the Debian profile. If I was an Ubuntu developer and only made packages for Ubuntu, I would want my lintian to use the Ubuntu rule set. Like: * Warn if I (or a tool) had chosen unstable as target for my upload. * Do /not/ warn about various Debian-only NMU policies. * Etc. I routinely run lintian from within pbuilder and that switch isn't set (and I wonder if it should). It is certainly a valid solution to have pbuilder pass --profile, although I am not sure pbuilder can compute the desired profile value automatically for each chroot. A different alternative is to run lintian /inside/ the chroot. * Inside a Debian chroot lintian will accurately determine that it should default to Debian policies. * Alternatively, you can set LINTIAN_PROFILE in the ENV or in your ~/.lintianrc (or in your XDG_CONFIG_HOME/lintian/.lintianrc) to the desired profile. Looks a lot like an Ubuntuism to me. If anything, it is an upstreamism. * You are very welcome to propose an alternative solution to the current profile setup. I would certainly be interested in hearing it. - Though in that case, we should probably move the discussion upstream to the Debian BTS. The current implementation comes from the following sources - though note that we have diverged from specs proposed back then in a few ways: * https://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/04/msg00277.html * https://wiki.debian.org/Lintian/Spec/VendorCustomization Somewhere down the line we also hooked a few more items on the profiles. Notably vendor specific data files and third-party checks. I don't understand why lintian on Ubuntu complains and should continue to complain about the unstable release pocket. Please explain if there are valid reasons this must be so. I hope the above already explained this. If not, by all means please ask clarifying questions. Thanks, ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1303603 Title: bad-distribution-in-changes-file unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1303603/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1319295] Re: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #745877 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745877 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319295 Title: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1319295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1319295] [NEW] Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package
On 2014-05-14 10:18, Marius B. Kotsbak wrote: Public bug reported: Reproduced by downloading this package: http://downloads.typesafe.com/scala/2.11.0/scala-2.11.0.deb and running lintian: $ lintian Downloads/scala-2.11.0.deb [...] After that output, lintian hangs using 100% CPU. Ah, after running strace, I see that it is actually analyzing the HTML files, probably searching for more JS libs: [...] ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: lintian 2.5.22ubuntu1 [...] Hi, This is almost certainly [Debian#745877], which was fixed in 2.5.24. It seem to have been fixed in the following upstream commits[1]: * b402a1e48d81fb60ecb8cb517f3f3f356eadc2e0 * de9b838c92c613a70f69cd4e16a86752c47b9c9e (Despite being just a perl critic warning it avoids using $, which has been known to cause performance issues). ~Niels [Debian#745877]: https://bugs.debian.org/745877 [1] Source at: https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319295 Title: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1319295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1351380] Lintian crashes with undefined value if deb lacks intermediate directories
On 2014-08-01 18:23, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
Public bug reported:
If I create a deb with install4j that installs to /opt/test/ - then
lintian crashes:
[...]
Hi,
Thanks for the report and the following analysis of the problem.
Should you run into future crash issues with lintian, please consider
filing the bug against lintian upstream.
I have applied a few patches upstream for this issue:
* [f89954f] - Fixes the crash
* [4d6bb4e] - Adds a warning for not having intermediate directories
These are scheduled for inclusion in lintian 2.5.32.
* I am not maintaining the Ubuntu package, so I /cannot/ comment on
whether this will be fixed in / backported to your current Ubuntu
release.
[...]
However no special case is done for the missing intermediate
directories, and the above does not initialize.
Adding so it ends with:
$idxh{''} = \%cpy;
$children{''} = [] unless exists $children{''};
}
Fixes the problem:
[...]
This indeed avoided the crash. However, it would leave the path
structure disconnected causing several checks to report incorrect
results (in particular in Lintian/2.5.28).
Therefore I have solved this differently by constructing all missing
intermediate directories (see [f89954f]), which also trivially allowed
for us to discover/report the missing intermediate directories.
Once again, thanks for the report and the following analysis.
Thanks,
~Niels
[f89954f]:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=f89954f8e87515c839849c59568261be256c7081
[4d6bb4e]:
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=4d6bb4edd26d74f675fb5bcad853d6e05e7fca3f
Bug handling:
bug 1351380
tag patch
status fixcommitted
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1351380
Title:
Lintian crashes with undefined value if deb lacks intermediate
directories
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1351380/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1319295] Re: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package
Forgot some bug tagging for: [Bug 1319295] Re: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package bug 1319295 tags patch status fixcommitted ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1319295 Title: Lintian uses a lot of time doing analyzing of HTML pages in package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1319295/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169636] [NEW] lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure
*** This bug is a security vulnerability *** Public security bug reported: An unimportant security vulnerabilities have been found in Lintian. In short, using crafted packages an attacker could have Lintian leak information about the host system provided the raw log is available. Fixes available in 2.5.10.5 and 2.5.12. (Reference: http://bugs.debian.org/705553) ** Affects: lintian (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169636 Title: lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1169636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169636] Re: lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure
Attached is a tarball containing a set of patches for fixing this in 2.5.6. For Lintian 2.5.10.X, the patches can be pulled from upstream's git repository via: git show 2.5.10.4..2.5.10.5 For Lintian 2.5.11: git show a5680cc4f7ca733f83a16c9bff0e0fa10525c46e..751dee4653e5960ca03f3164c15bb849a85fc976 For Lintian 2.4.3: git show 8a6f1682051c39ecc0088acb194ea7754b23a553..ddd524862684bbbc3b6c045b400dd7e5767c5935 ~Niels ** Attachment added: tarball of patches for 2.5.6ish https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1169636/+attachment/3645696/+files/lintian-2.5.6-patches.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169636 Title: lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1169636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1169636] Re: lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #705553 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705553 ** Also affects: lintian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705553 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1169636 Title: lintian: CVE-2013-1429 - path traversal/information disclosure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/lintian/+bug/1169636/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1132059] [NEW] Please sync sentinella/0.9.1-1 from Debian experimental main
Public bug reported: The latest debian changelog is: sentinella (0.9.1-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream release. - Drop patch cherry-picked in 0.9.0-2. * Use an absolute path to the icon in the Debian menu file. * Use the canonical URLs for the Vcs-* fields in debian/control file. * Bump Standards-Versions to 3.9.4 - Use the new URI for the DEP-5 copyright format. -- Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Sat, 23 Feb 2013 09:59:27 +0100 To be honst, I think the upstream changes are slightly more interesting for Ubuntu: Sentinella 0.9.1 (released 2012-10-23) * Updated translations. * Added minimize button under Unity. * Fixed bug when trying to create the process API. * Now the conditions and actions are freed properly. * Minor fixes. It was uploaded to experimental only because Debian is in a deep freeze (otherwise I would have targeted unstable without hesistation). ** Affects: sentinella (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1132059 Title: Please sync sentinella/0.9.1-1 from Debian experimental main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sentinella/+bug/1132059/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1092892] Re: Please sync lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental (main)
This issue is fix in git. See commit f4bc03f. I suspect that the ARB people would appreciate it if you cherry-picked 60b0055 as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892 Title: Please sync lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1092892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1092892] Re: Merge lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental
On 2012-12-23 09:52, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: Hi Niels (thanks for reading our reports!), do you know what can cause the shared-libs-non-pic-i386 error? Here's my log: http://paste.ubuntu.com/1458988/. No, I am afraid I don't. It is an i386-only test, so I haven't run it for a while. There are two places things could have broken here. One is that the binary produced is now built with pic (which it shouldn't). The other issue could be that Lintian's detection is broken. Lintian 2.5.11 hasn't changed anything in the test itself or the template files used to construct the test. So if the binary is now built with pic, it could be a change in gcc (or flags exported by dpkg-buildflags, but I am not aware of any changes there). On the other hand, Lintian has seen changes in the script that parses the readelf output and loads its into memory. If this is the reason, we are probably looking at a regression introduced in 1ca9aa1 or 701e44e. If you can extract the i386 binary package produced by that test, I can have a look at fixing it. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892 Title: Merge lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1092892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1092892] Re: Merge lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental
On 2012-12-23 12:18, Dmitry Shachnev wrote: On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net wrote: If you can extract the i386 binary package produced by that test, I can have a look at fixing it. Here it is. ** Attachment added: libbaz3-1_1.0_i386.deb https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1092892/+attachment/3466373/+files/libbaz3-1_1.0_i386.deb Thank you. Fixed in git[1]. Fix attached as patch. ~Niels [1] commit cf53f431d08571963191994b2f12311248bfe4de ** Attachment added: 0001-L-C-Binary-Re-instate-the-TEXTREL-marker.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892/+attachment/3466385/+files/0001-L-C-Binary-Re-instate-the-TEXTREL-marker.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1092892 Title: Merge lintian 2.5.11 from Debian experimental To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1092892/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1072398] Re: It is unable to check (or it ignores) the net activity
Fixed in 0.6.4-1 (raring). ** Package changed: sentinella (Ubuntu) = libsysactivity (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: libsysactivity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1072398 Title: It is unable to check (or it ignores) the net activity To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsysactivity/+bug/1072398/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1020358] Re: minor error while installing acroread
Hi, This is fixed in Lintian/2.5.9 (i.e. Quantal Quetzal), so marking it as Fix Released. ~Niels ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1020358 Title: minor error while installing acroread To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1020358/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890587] Re: lintian upgrade to 2.5.0ubuntu1~natty1 fails: no Filename: field
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890587 Title: lintian upgrade to 2.5.0ubuntu1~natty1 fails: no Filename: field To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/890587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1012459] Re: carve out distro information to distro-info package
Hi, For the record, this has already been filed against Lintian as #667614[1], where I have debating this with Benjamin Drung. Feel free to follow up on the Debian bug if you have ideas for solving the problem etc. ~Niels [1] http://bugs.debian.org/667614 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #667614 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=667614 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012459 Title: carve out distro information to distro-info package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/1012459/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824122] Re: overrides for some errors no longer work
An update on this: Lintian/2.5.3 properly reports if certain overrides may have been ignored due to the current profile (with --verbose it lists tags it saw overrides for). As mentioned earlier, patches for the Ubuntu profile are still welcome. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824122 Title: overrides for some errors no longer work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/824122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 890587] Re: lintian upgrade to 2.5.0ubuntu1~natty1 fails: no Filename: field
Hi, Sounds like your mirror was (temporarily) broken; can you retry this (possibly with another mirror)? ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890587 Title: lintian upgrade to 2.5.0ubuntu1~natty1 fails: no Filename: field To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/890587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 773430] Re: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Log says: Setting up lintian (2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3) ... Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use Segmentation fault dpkg: error processing lintian (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 I strongly suspect it was either a transitional issue or that bug has already been fixed. The Lintian postinst uses only coreutils and localedef; if any of these were broken, Lintian would hardly be your only issue. I suspect that there may have been an issue in locales (see LP: #885106[1]). Newer versions of Lintian (2.5.5) will not generate an internal locale with recent eglibc (= 2.13), so the problems should have been mitigated in newer versions of Lintian. ~Niels [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/885106 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773430 Title: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/773430/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885106] Re: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Hi, In your apt log I found this: Setting up lintian (2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3) ... Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use /usr/share/i18n/locales/iso14651_t1:10: symbol `U8927' has the same encoding as /usr/share/i18n/locales/iso14651_t1:10: symbol `U8A07' dpkg: error processing lintian (--configure): subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 and I am reassigning this bug to locales, which maintains these files. That being said, I suspect this bug have been fixed by now (though I am not running Ubuntu, so I have not verified it). ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885106 Title: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/885106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 885106] Re: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
** Package changed: lintian (Ubuntu) = langpack-locales (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885106 Title: package lintian 2.5.0~rc2ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/langpack-locales/+bug/885106/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 905979] Re: package lintian 2.3.4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré
Hi, By the looks of it Log started: 2011-12-18 11:36:47 Paramétrage de man-db (2.5.7-2ubuntu1) ... debconf: DbDriver config: /var/cache/debconf/config.dat is locked by another process: Ressource temporairement non disponible dpkg : erreur de traitement de man-db (--configure) : le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 Paramétrage de libapt-pkg-perl (0.1.24) ... Paramétrage de apt-show-versions (0.16) ... ** initializing cache. This may take a while ** Des erreurs ont été rencontrées pendant l'exécution : man-db your installation of man-db is broken and that needs to be solved before lintian can be installed. Once the man-db issue is solved, the lintian install should work. I would recommend you contacted an Ubuntu support channel (e.g. the forums) and ask for help to sort out the issue. Please show them at least this log snippet above or refer them to this bug (by the looks of it, there is a problem with running debconf, which may be the root of the problem). If there are still issues with installing Lintian after man-db (or/and debconf) has been fixed, feel free to report back here with the new error. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/905979 Title: package lintian 2.3.4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: problèmes de dépendances - laissé non configuré To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/905979/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 888934] Re: eclipse version 3.7.0-1 failed to build with openjdk-7
I haven't looked at the entire log or anything, but I suspect it is because upstream is using a special source/target combination that allows them to compile 1.5+ code into 1.4 byte code (or so). I believe it is JSR14... To my knowledge, upstream is already aware of it[1], though I am not quite up to speed with its status. As far as I can tell, it is currently targeted for the release after 3.8 (3.9 or possible 4.X). ~Niels [1] http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/p2-dev/msg04656.html https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369145 ** Bug watch added: Eclipse bugs #369145 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=369145 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/888934 Title: eclipse version 3.7.0-1 failed to build with openjdk-7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/888934/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 972264] Re: Is it true that eclipse can consume 900's of thousands kB of virtual memory?
Hi, I very much doubt that eclipse (itself) is using 900 MB of memory. From your logs (with manual re-alignment): [ 5682.395679] [ pid ] uid tgid total_vm rss cpu oom_adj oom_score_adj name [ 5682.383742] [ 1996] 1000 1996 24562060334 0 0 0 eclipse [...] [ 5682.396532] [ 2012] 1000 1996 24562060572 0 0 0 eclipse The total_vm appears to be ~239.86 MB and not the ~959.45MB your log claims in the bottom. More likely, the kernel has determined that if it kills eclipse, the processes spawned from eclipse will be killed as well. The ~960MB are probably the totally recovered memory of this action. If you are running some processes from eclipse, please check they are not using extreme amounts of memory or that you actually terminate them completely. Eclipse does not terminate interactive processes you no longer use for you - you have to do that manually and keep in mind that the eclipse process console can hide active processes behind dead ones. Please refer to [1] for further help with the process console. ~Niels [1] http://help.eclipse.org/helios/index.jsp?topic=%2Forg.eclipse.jdt.doc.user%2Freference%2Fviews%2Fconsole %2Fref-process_console.htm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972264 Title: Is it true that eclipse can consume 900's of thousands kB of virtual memory? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/972264/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903146] Re: please add support for globbing
When you say support shell globbing when specifying file paths, do you mean in overrides? ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903146 Title: please add support for globbing To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/903146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 903146] Re: please add support for globbing in overrides
Thanks for the clarification. I believe the feature you requested are already available in Lintian (since 2.5.0~rc4). Please refer to [1] for more information. It matches more than a regular shell glob, but I believe it covers what you wanted. Furthermore, please note that it is also possible to create architecture specific overrides. However this is not properly documented at the moment. ~Niels [1] http://lintian.debian.org/manual/section-2.4.html#section-2.4.1 [...] If you add an asterisk (*) in the additional info, this will match arbitrary strings similar to the shell wildcard. The first wildcard support appeared in Lintian 2.0.0, which only allowed the wildcards in the very beginning or end. Version 2.5.0~rc4 extended this to allow wildcards any where in the additional info. ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/903146 Title: please add support for globbing in overrides To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/903146/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884169] Re: Java license being breached on Launchpad
Hi, java-common has nothing to do with license issues in PPAs. I believe those should be filed as questions against launchpad itself. I have forwarded your request (see [1]). I am leaving this open until the launchpad people has had a look. ~Niels [1] https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/176974 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884169 Title: Java license being breached on Launchpad To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/884169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 830650] Re: package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-40ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: afhængighedsproblemer - efterlader den ukonfigureret
Hi, According to your AptOrdering log, you are trying to install the Java provided by sun-java6 instead of openjdk-6. In that case you should remove default-jre (default-jre-headless/default-jdk/...) as well (they are meta packages to pull in an open-source JVM; in your case openjdk-6). APT should have asked you if you wanted to remove those as well; if you did not use APT directly, there may be a bug in the frontend you used. It should not have allowed you to remove openjdk-6 without asking if it could take default-jre with it. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/830650 Title: package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-40ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: afhængighedsproblemer - efterlader den ukonfigureret To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/830650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 818174] Re: Please upgrade to Eclipse 3.7 Indigo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 604390 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604390 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 604390 Upgrade Eclipse to 3.7 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818174 Title: Please upgrade to Eclipse 3.7 Indigo To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/818174/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 751650] Re: eclipse crashed with SIGABRT in ContiguousSpace::block_start_const()
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 759702 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/759702 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 759702 eclipse crashed with SIGABRT in ContiguousSpace::block_start_const() -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/751650 Title: eclipse crashed with SIGABRT in ContiguousSpace::block_start_const() To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/751650/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624693] Re: Eclipse crashes on initialization or when clicking on menus
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624693 Title: Eclipse crashes on initialization or when clicking on menus To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/624693/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 633198 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 633198 Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711007 Title: eclipse C++ editor fails to open To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/711007/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 633198] Re: Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick
** Bug watch added: Eclipse bugs #351485 https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351485 ** Also affects: eclipse-eclipsers via https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351485 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198 Title: Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/eclipse-eclipsers/+bug/633198/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825781] Re: package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-40ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: kravproblem - setter ikke opp pakken
Hi Looks like your DpkgTerminalLog log is incomplete, so I cannot diagnose your problem. From the AptOrdering log it looks like you are trying to remove (some) openjdk-6 (packages) and install sun-java6 instead. If so, then you have to remove default-jre(-headless) as well since it depends on openjdk-6, however this is not a bug in default-jre. If a Java package you use will be removed by the removal of default- jre(-headless) it is possible (in fact very likely) that it has the wrong dependencies. In this you should file a bug against that package, requesting it to be installable with just sun-java6. ~Niels ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825781 Title: package default-jre-headless 1:1.6-40ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: kravproblem - setter ikke opp pakken To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/825781/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825086] Re: package eclipse-pde (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: no package named `eclipse-pde' is installed, cannot configure
Hi This is definitely not a problem in eclipse-pde; I suspect it is your upgrade application that choked. I saw multiple errors from dpkg in the MainLog, the DistupgradeTermlog is cut off (not to mention it starts with two Segmentation Faults). I am re-assigning this to the software-center people for now; I hope they can redirect it to the right place if it is not their desk. ~Niels ** Package changed: eclipse (Ubuntu) = software-center (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825086 Title: package eclipse-pde (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: no package named `eclipse-pde' is installed, cannot configure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/825086/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 825086] Re: package eclipse-pde (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: no package named `eclipse-pde' is installed, cannot configure
I should clarify my last comment. This is a risk that the problem is in eclipse-pde, but I strongly suspect the upgrade tool of being broken. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825086 Title: package eclipse-pde (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: no package named `eclipse-pde' is installed, cannot configure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/825086/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 824122] Re: overrides for some errors no longer work
Hi This is a feature of the new Lintian profiles in 2.5.2. Vendor profiles may declare some tags non-overridable and dir-or-file-in-opt is one of those. The ubuntu vendor profile inherits this (indirectly) from the ftp-master-auto-reject profile. Whether these tags should be non-overridable in Ubuntu, I do not know. I will leave it to Ubuntu developers to figure that out and send patches to us accordingly. If this package is for a third-party vendor, it may be useful to create a separate lintian profile for that vendor. Please refer to the Lintian user manual (installed in /usr/share/doc/lintian/) for more info on what profiles can do and how to make them. I can second that Lintian could be more helpful with declaring that it has ignored overrides. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/824122 Title: overrides for some errors no longer work To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/824122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625345] Re: Can't call method data on an undefined value at /usr/share/lintian/checks/deb-format line 63
Hi I am going to mark this as fixed then, since I believe the 2.5.0~rc2 fix should avoid the undefined/internal error problems. ~Niels ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625345 Title: Can't call method data on an undefined value at /usr/share/lintian/checks/deb-format line 63 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cdbs/+bug/625345/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 820245] [NEW] Please sync sentinella/0.9.0-2 from Debian sid main
Public bug reported: Please sync sentinella/0.9.0-2 from Debian sid main. Upstream informed me of an error in some logic in 0.9.0 and 0.9.0-2 carries a patch for this. ** Affects: libsysactivity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/820245 Title: Please sync sentinella/0.9.0-2 from Debian sid main To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsysactivity/+bug/820245/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 798513] Re: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1
You might want to cherry-pick 5d5a40f[1]. ~Niels [1]http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commit;h=5d5a40fb5a5f7cbda8ec4b200decaba73d8c3580 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798513 Title: Candidate revision lintian 2.5.1ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/798513/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 790573] Re: Eclipse screen in USC describes eclipse-jdt and eclipse-pde but doesn't let you install them
Considering eclipse-platform is already Recommending eclipse-pde and suggesting eclipse-jdt (at least in 3.5.2-9), I am not really sure changing anything will help. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/790573 Title: Eclipse screen in USC describes eclipse-jdt and eclipse-pde but doesn't let you install them -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600584] Re: Eclipse crashes on startup because of kernel revision
Hi We should be carrying a fix for this issue in eclipse 3.5.2-8 or newer (e.g. Natty and newer)[1]. So I guess we need a backport to Lucid. Are there people using either Maverick or Karmic that would like this to be backported to their repository as well? Bejamin, I am leaving the actual backporting to us, if that is okay with you. If you want to cherry-pick it from git, then it appears to be commit 00118457 from the master branch. ~Niels [1] The patch is called debian/patches/bp-osgi-allow-illegal-os- qualifier.patch in the source package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600584 Title: Eclipse crashes on startup because of kernel revision -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688136] Re: Eclipse menu bar does not appear in eclipse or the global menu
Hi I think you need to file a bug against the unity menu for these applications (unfortunately the package name eludes me at the moment). Currently eclipse (incl. vanilla Eclipse) has an exception in the menu, but all this eclipse-derived applications probably do not. As a temporary work around it should work to set the environment variable UBUNTU_MENUPROXY to 0 (and export it), but it will affect all applications launched by this program as well (this is the reason eclipse got its exception). From a normal bash terminal this can be done with: $ export UBUNTU_MENUPROXY=0 $ /path/to/application ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688136 Title: Eclipse menu bar does not appear in eclipse or the global menu -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631716] Re: SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x045d3cee, pid=2834, tid=2981940080
Hi There are two possible causes for this and I suspect you need to fix both for it to work. First off there are some old shared libraries extracted into ~/.eclipse/ that you have to remove. These are (most likely) compiled against older versions of system libraries and will definitely be a source of crashes (if not now, then at least in the future). Secondly it appears you have multiple versions of xulrunner installed. Please uninstall the one that eclipse is not linked against, since eclipse tends to find both of them and is generally unable to handle this correctly. Please let us know if this solves your issue. ~Niels ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631716 Title: SIGSEGV (0xb) at pc=0x045d3cee, pid=2834, tid=2981940080 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 663275] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 Eclipse crashes when debugging: libglib-2.0.so.0+0x70038
@andmark: Looks like you are not using eclipse from Ubuntu, if that is the case, then there is little we can do you help you. Most likely your eclipse is compiled against older versions of libraries shipped with Ubuntu and a recompile will fix your issue. @Adrian Casajus: Different issue as far as I can tell. Do you still experience it? ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663275 Title: Ubuntu 10.10 Eclipse crashes when debugging: libglib-2.0.so.0+0x70038 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625345] Re: Can't call method data on an undefined value at /usr/share/lintian/checks/deb-format line 63
Actually I suspect this is (partly) fixed by commit 3b9d80fba[1]. It is possible that the package is tagged for using LZMA compression, but it should not cause an internal error. If this not the case, please provide the binary causing the internal error and I will have a look at it. ~Niels [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=3b9d80fbaa99df16afe83e1b582643290807f156 This is scheduled for 2.5.0~rc2 (or newer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625345 Title: Can't call method data on an undefined value at /usr/share/lintian/checks/deb-format line 63 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 624693] Re: Eclipse crashes on initialization or when clicking on menus
@McMenace: You are using an eclipse from eclipse.org; Ubuntu people has little chance to help you with that. You should file a bug against the upstream eclipse bug tracker. Note, judging from the crash log your problem could very well be different from the original one. @Yoav Caspi: I assume the above also holds, since Ubuntu does not ship Helios. If the Galileo was with the eclipse from Ubuntu, please follow up here with a crash log. @gadLinux: You said it fixed it to run eclipse as root; can you run eclipse now without root or does it still crash if you are not using root? ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/624693 Title: Eclipse crashes on initialization or when clicking on menus -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 678033] Re: eclipse has unresolvable dependencies
Mike does this problem still persist? My best guess would be that the eclipse-rcp package for your architecture was not built/available on the mirror when you tried. ~Niels ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/678033 Title: eclipse has unresolvable dependencies -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 598371] Re: Java crashes during Eclipse Helios Start
Alright, I am closing this as invalid then since gtk-qt-engine has been removed and the eclipse binary involved is not from Ubuntu so we cannot really do much about it. ~Niels ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598371 Title: Java crashes during Eclipse Helios Start -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 625823] Re: Eclipse crashes when starting
@Gerhard Bogner: The log posted is from an Ubuntu from eclipse.org; Ubuntu cannot really do much to fix binaries supplied from upstream. You are welcome to file a bug on eclipse.org's bug tracker about this. Alternatively you can try to reproduce it with eclipse from Ubuntu (although Ubuntu does not have eclipse 3.6); if you do, please post the crash log. ~Niels ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/625823 Title: Eclipse crashes when starting -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 673606] Re: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: error writing to 'standard output': No such file or directory
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 653927 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 653927 package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory * You can subscribe to bug 653927 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/653927/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/673606 Title: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: error writing to 'standard output': No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653929] Re: package default-jre-headless 1.6-34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: Input/output error
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 653927 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 653927 package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory * You can subscribe to bug 653927 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/653927/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653929 Title: package default-jre-headless 1.6-34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: Input/output error -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653927] Re: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory
Hi I have read the entire DpkgTerminalLog.gz file and I cannot seem to find the point of failure. Are you certain you have attached the correct log file? ~Niels ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927 Title: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 653927] Re: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory
Hey, Got the same issue 3 times and it appears that the log itself is prematurely terminated in relation to this error. My guess is that the error happens because the log file is (for some reason) closed, when dpkg is trying to configure java-common (or default-*). Do you still experience the error (e.g. does it happen every time you try to upgrade/install packages and always in java-common or one of the default-* packages)? ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653927 Title: package java-common 0.34 failed to install/upgrade: Fehler beim Schreiben von »Standardausgabe«: No such file or directory -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683347] Re: Lintian fails over xipho-dbg with objdump-info failed
Hi Dmitrijs Thanks for testing it; this will be fixed with the next version of Lintian (expected to be 2.5.0) ~Niels ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683347 Title: Lintian fails over xipho-dbg with objdump-info failed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 722170] [NEW] Sync sentinella 0.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main)
Public bug reported: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 affects ubuntu/sentinella status new importance wishlist subscribe ubuntu-sponsors done Please sync sentinella 0.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) Changelog entries since current natty version 0.7.3-2: sentinella (0.8.0-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstrema release. * Added --no-add-needed,--as-needed to linker flags. * Removed a space from the version passed to help2man. -- Niels Thykier ni...@thykier.net Fri, 18 Feb 2011 11:13:01 +0100 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJNYSbDAAoJEAVLu599gGRCNp4P/1IErgiLZTS2BxooRTpiVYTc TMMdwR2mKucWE7q79jxLvgMQk9+S4iGvs+51scuXo+akRfTppsfjK2I6+CHnbkf6 GFZq2LWbFWErzVF2BZTPU/4ereJVYJvMz1FdRaFbg/nx46Ji6lmBeu9vJoWAfJ8b K4NWt6sFc98ZQ0G6tKP9sEoRCBZCsp/RSLNkjzRo4Q4AYgvVey/YcQO1uZwo+QjK COTaEPiB5HtGB91LUtf0oJDtZzM5xCkkMQmCrWMeFDTJa93ngDGikXRuVhPz99iy IfZhC+Ej4hUW8cdzi0BJy29DxwORPVQBjRE5xsgKMgE9PmbMTHmwSojgCU91BsBb /gJTEXE5mHnt4Ws+mgIXN3AJ9KPoT/fGAEGNImJPGiwU/ePQQ0f8999KAgVpyNu8 Z5Lei6ZM5H21MQ/JaSrdanxMa1x3PDmCPREodhcreysR/EAxa+54RSqEv99ksp0Z jycqGwxs4qnhdnOvU+jspv1ys3wnST1JPHY+xNpT8KwRB/f3Hrcx3txrdX9wgVf/ zjimLHATC62F1iJfknT1V6dlE4BYM3L2NAesXPLejFpR/44YZh2vvslNrQGWuoJt QWXvvIS9KJObUf2n/GVdghthDzKZ1U9PV3BQE7PRM6Lk7bnM3Kck0dLg7Rco+jwP 4a+gfxVhyN3XUOUeqBCC =I16u -END PGP SIGNATURE- ** Affects: sentinella (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/722170 Title: Sync sentinella 0.8.0-1 (universe) from Debian sid (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 629924] Re: package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789 package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subscribe to bug 659789 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/659789/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/629924 Title: package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu1~lucid1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683347] Re: Lintian fails over xipho-dbg with objdump-info failed
Hey Raphael, Do you think this the same as http://bugs.debian.org/604047 ? ~Niels ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #604047 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=604047 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683347 Title: Lintian fails over xipho-dbg with objdump-info failed -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 659789] Re: package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
Hi The relevant part of the DpkgTerminalLog.gz appears to be: Configurazione di lintian (2.4.3ubuntu2)... Generating en_US.UTF-8 locale for internal Lintian use cannot open locale definition file `en_US': Nessun file o directory I am guessing that last error is ... `en_US': No such file or directory. From the postinst script of Lintian, I am guessing the failure happens in gen_locale; but I have difficulties figuring out why it happens (maybe because I am looking at a Debian system without the issue, but still). ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789 Title: package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 584335] Re: package lintian 2.3.4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789 package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subscribe to bug 659789 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/659789/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584335 Title: package lintian 2.3.4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 516129] Re: lintian error code 1 on dist-upgrade
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 659789 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659789 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 659789 package lintian 2.4.3ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1 * You can subscribe to bug 659789 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lintian/+bug/659789/+subscribe -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/516129 Title: lintian error code 1 on dist-upgrade -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 711007] Re: eclipse C++ editor fails to open
Hey, Could you check if you are suffering from LP: #633198[1]? ~Niels [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/633198 ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711007 Title: eclipse C++ editor fails to open -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 633198] Re: Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick
Hey, Someone with sufficient permissions; please mark this as Triaged and Priority Medium (or even High). ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198 Title: Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 703896] [NEW] Multiple license issues
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dropbox Hi Debian bug #610257[1] suggests that there possibly multiple license issues in dropbox: 1) ncrypt-0.6.4-*.egg/, according to its PKG-INFO (which is horribly mangled, BTW), contains a GPL-licensed library with accompanying source. Additionally, this library is linked to OpenSSL, but those two licenses are incompatible. 2) netifaces-0.5*.egg/ contains the netifaces library, which is MIT-licensed. One of the clause of the license is The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. Neither is included in dropbox. 3) _dbus*_bindings.so is the python-dbus library. It is MIT-licensed, but copyright permission notices are not included. 4) _librsync.so contains statically-linked librync library which is under LGPL-2.1+ license. No source is provided. 5) _speedups.so contains (parts of) the simplejson library. It is MIT-licensed, but copyright permission notices are not included. 6) pyexpat.so contains statically linked Expat library. It is MIT-licensed, but copyright permission notices are not included. 7) libcrypto.so.0.9.8, libssl.so.0.9.8 are parts of the OpenSSL library. Its license require that Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution. Neither is reproduced in dropbox. 8) libncurses.so.5 is the ncurses library. It is MIT-licensed, but copyright permission notices are not included. I figured you might want to be made aware of this. ~Niels [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610257 ** Affects: dropbox (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Tags: license-issues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/703896 Title: Multiple license issues -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608231] Re: allows to in package descriptions not caught by lintian
Hi I have just committed a patch to Lintian's VCS[1] for this issue. I used allows one to as correction based on a debate with the Lintian maintainers[2]. Thanks for the report. ~Niels [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=lintian/lintian.git;a=commitdiff;h=ba2d36f8b01f6db1bd12e14fe1ce798cdc7d5aa4 [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-lint-maint/2011/01/msg00057.html ** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608231 Title: allows to in package descriptions not caught by lintian -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 608231] Re: allows to in package descriptions not caught by lintian
Hey, Sounds like a decent idea. Do you have any suggestions for a correction? ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/608231 Title: allows to in package descriptions not caught by lintian -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 688856] Re: package java-common 0.30ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: there is no script in the new version of the package - giving up
Hi Is this a migration from Karmic to Lynx? If so, have you upgraded your dpkg and doc-base package first? ~Niels ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/688856 Title: package java-common 0.30ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: there is no script in the new version of the package - giving up -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687263] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java
Hi What you see here is intended behavior (at least in case of the default-java symlink and update-alternatives). The issue here is probably that what Java packagers understand with default from what users expect. default-java has been used by packagers to denote the default Java implementation used for compiling Java packages. I can clearly see how you would come to the conclusion you did and I have taken this up with the Debian Java Team. Though any changes to how default-java behaves is out of the question for Maverick (too many packages depend on the behavior). Most likely we will introduce a new symlink for this purpose in Natty (or later). As for java-wrappers and how it handles this case. I suspect the tool will need an update to properly handle this case; whether this can make it into Maverick is an entirely different case. Since I do not work on this tool I will not make any promises on this; however, you should be able to work around this issue by using JAVA_FLAVOR (see man 7 java- wrappers). ~Niels ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Niels Thykier (niels-thykier) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687263 Title: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687263] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java
Taking this (in regards to solving the default-java issue). We probably need a separate bug for java-wrappers. ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Assignee: Niels Thykier (niels-thykier) = (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687263 Title: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687263] Re: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java
Hi The change you suggest will solve your particular problem, but for someone wanting to do the other way transformation (etc. sun-java6 - openjdk-6) will now have a problem. That being said, I think the reverse is probably less likely to happen in the real world and your solution here will probably be a decent work-around for Maverick. The long term solution is probably to update java-wrappers to prefer the system default java if it fulfills the requirements (also it should probably be updated to not include 4+ JVMs that are now removed from Debian) and then fall back to its chosen order (if the system default is not good enough). Though again, I am not working on java-wrappers so I will not make any decisions here. On a side note: openjdk-6 is a vastly better choice than e.g. gcj/gij or some of the now removed JVMs such as sablevm or kaffe. I suspect the /usr/lib/jvm/* might have caught the gcj/gij before the openjdk-6; this is likely the reason why it was added early in the list. ~Niels -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687263 Title: /usr/lib/jvm/default-java not changed by sudo update-alternatives --config java -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687386] Re: package jetty 6.1.20-2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installati on instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 127
Hi It appears to be a missing dependency on adduser. You can work around this by installing adduser (e.g. aptitude install adduser jetty) I cannot reproduce issue in an sid chroot, so it has probably been fixed somewhere between 6.1.20-2 and 6.1.24-6. ~Niels ** Changed in: jetty (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687386 Title: package jetty 6.1.20-2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 127 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 687386] Re: package jetty 6.1.20-2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script post-installati on instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 127
Okay, that does not make sense after all. I checked[1] and adduser
clearly appears in the Depends of jetty.
~Niels
[1] http://launchpadlibrarian.net/34043110/jetty_6.1.20-2.diff.gz
...
+Package: jetty
+Architecture: all
+Depends: ${misc:Depends}, libjetty-java (= ${source:Version}),
+ libjetty-java-doc (= ${source:Version}), adduser, jsvc, apache2-utils
...
** Changed in: jetty (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/687386
Title:
package jetty 6.1.20-2 failed to install/upgrade: sub-processo script
post-installation instalado retornou estado de saída de erro 127
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 683534] Re: eclipse does not start with custom kernel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 600584 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600584 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 600584 Eclipse crashes on startup because of kernel revision * You can subscribe to bug 600584 by following this link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/600584/+subscribe -- eclipse does not start with custom kernel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/683534 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 633198] Re: Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick
@Henri Sivonen Hey, sorry for the late reply. The sed recipe looks like it will work in the average case, but unfortunately not every case as you experienced. The full solution, which I referred to in the Debian bug #587657, is to manually merge the two bundles info files. The user level bundles info will contain an outdated version of the system bundles info plus information for all the plugins you have installed yourself as a user (namely all the plugins you are missing). Updating the outdated information in the user level bundles info appears to fix the issue. ~Niels -- Plugins Stopped Working After Upgrade To Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/633198 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 655833] Re: Eclipse Foundation Code-signing certificate chain not trusted
Hi We have imported this on the Debian side to version 3.5.2-8 (not uploaded yet). Nevertheless next time Ubuntu merges with Debian, this patch will be included. Thanks for a detailed report and finding the patch, ~Niels -- Eclipse Foundation Code-signing certificate chain not trusted https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655833 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 651872] Re: jetty does not restart properly (test for already running is inverted for restart action)
Hey, I noticed we fixed this on the Debian side 6.1.24-6, so Maverick should be unaffected. ~Niels -- jetty does not restart properly (test for already running is inverted for restart action) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/651872 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656374] Re: Can't set java.library.path in /etc/default/jetty
** Patch added: Original patches merged into a unified patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jetty/+bug/656374/+attachment/1692246/+files/allow-jlp-default.patch -- Can't set java.library.path in /etc/default/jetty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 656374] Re: Can't set java.library.path in /etc/default/jetty
Forwarded to Debian as #600175. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #600175 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175 ** Also affects: jetty (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=600175 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Can't set java.library.path in /etc/default/jetty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/656374 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
