[Bug 1460618] [NEW] package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2
Public bug reported: Got a large number of W: GPG-errors: http://security.ubuntu.com trusty- security Release: The following signatures could not be verified to open the open key that is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY when trying to sudo apt-get update. Tried to dowload them all again, but didn''t help. Then i tried to sudo apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-extras-keyring, but then this happened, and tthere was an error trying to reinstall that package, so now that install is incomplete. It told me that the subprocess installed post-installation- script returned error code 2, and E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Note that some of my error-messages are in swedish, so some of this is just a rough translate. If you could help me resolve this, that would be much appriciated.. I can be reached at p...@niklaswallenius.se for more info. Flagged as a security vulnerability as I am now forced to install packages without authentication. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11 AptOrdering: ubuntu-extras-keyring: Install ubuntu-extras-keyring: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jun 1 12:58:09 2015 DpkgHistoryLog: Start-Date: 2015-06-01 12:57:57 Commandline: apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-extras-keyring Reinstall: ubuntu-extras-keyring:amd64 (2010.09.27) DuplicateSignature: package:ubuntu-extras-keyring:2010.09.27:underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 ErrorMessage: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-09-29 (244 days ago) InstallationMedia: Custom 14.04 - Release amd64 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-extras-keyring Title: package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: ubuntu-extras-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460618 Title: package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-extras-keyring/+bug/1460618/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1460618] Re: package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2
** Description changed: Got a large number of W: GPG-errors: http://security.ubuntu.com trusty- security Release: The following signatures could not be verified to open the open key that is not available: NO_PUBKEY 40976EAF437D05B5 NO_PUBKEY when trying to sudo apt-get update. Tried to dowload them all again, but didn''t help. Then i tried to sudo apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-extras-keyring, but then this happened, and tthere was an error trying to reinstall that package, so now that install is incomplete. It told me that the subprocess installed post-installation- script returned error code 2, and E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) Note that some of my error-messages are in swedish, so some of this is just a rough translate. If you could help me resolve this, that would be - much appriciated.. I can be reached at p...@niklaswallenius.se for more - info. + much appriciated.. Flagged as a security vulnerability as I am now forced to install packages without authentication. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04 Package: ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-53.89-generic 3.13.11-ckt19 Uname: Linux 3.13.0-53-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.11 AptOrdering: - ubuntu-extras-keyring: Install - ubuntu-extras-keyring: Configure + ubuntu-extras-keyring: Install + ubuntu-extras-keyring: Configure Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Jun 1 12:58:09 2015 DpkgHistoryLog: - Start-Date: 2015-06-01 12:57:57 - Commandline: apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-extras-keyring - Reinstall: ubuntu-extras-keyring:amd64 (2010.09.27) + Start-Date: 2015-06-01 12:57:57 + Commandline: apt-get install --reinstall ubuntu-extras-keyring + Reinstall: ubuntu-extras-keyring:amd64 (2010.09.27) DuplicateSignature: package:ubuntu-extras-keyring:2010.09.27:underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 ErrorMessage: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-09-29 (244 days ago) InstallationMedia: Custom 14.04 - Release amd64 PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-extras-keyring Title: package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Information type changed from Public to Private Security -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1460618 Title: package ubuntu-extras-keyring 2010.09.27 failed to install/upgrade: underprocessen installerade post-installation-skript gav felkod 2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-extras-keyring/+bug/1460618/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1342119] [NEW] Enable auto monitor off
Public bug reported: This is request, not a bug. On Xubuntu 14.04, lightdm-gtk-greeter is used in in conjunction with light locker. When leaving the computer, user can hit ctrl+alt+del to lock the screen and thus stopping others from accessing the computer. However, all screens remain switched on for an indefinite amount of time. It would be preferable if the screen switch off automatically after a minute or so, or after a user-defined amount of time. ** Affects: lightdm-gtk-greeter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Description changed: This is request, not a bug. On Xubuntu 14.04, lightdm-gtk-greeter is used in in conjunction with light locker. When leaving the computer, user can hit ctrl+alt+del to - lock to screen and thus stopping others from accessing the computer. + lock the screen and thus stopping others from accessing the computer. However, all screens remain switched on for an indefinite amount of time. It would be preferable if the screen switch off automatically after a minute or so, or after a user-defined amount of time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1342119 Title: Enable auto monitor off To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm-gtk-greeter/+bug/1342119/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414489] Re: Feature request: dynamic range compression
I'm sure there must be tons of people who would want this, they just don't know about it... I just thought the sound in Ubuntu is flat, and the only thing I miss from Windows is Breakaway Audio Enhancer. Then I found something called audio compression in VLC, which seemed to be what I missed.. But like all else here, I would like this to work system- wide! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414489 Title: Feature request: dynamic range compression To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/414489/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 892333] Re: Playing error : Resource not found. at /usr/bin/../share/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrowser_gstreamer-0.10.pm line 135.
While this issue isn't entirely just because of an error in gmusicplayer, wouldn't it seem like a really good idea to look over the start-up process of gmusicplayer, and make sure it automounts all usb drivers? I was tearing my hair out before i figured out what was wrong myself. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/892333 Title: Playing error : Resource not found. at /usr/bin/../share/gmusicbrowser/gmusicbrowser_gstreamer-0.10.pm line 135. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmusicbrowser/+bug/892333/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234448] Re: Encoding errors in gmusicbrowser_1.1.10-0ubuntu1
Good to see that there is a patch for this, but how do I get this into my program (gmusicbrowser). Being a total newbie on Xubuntu (my 1:st day on Linux..) I really don't know how to use this.. Where do I go, what do I download, what then..? :) Basically I googled: gmusicplayer à that's how I found this, and that's the level I'm at! :) Greatful for assistance! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234448 Title: Encoding errors in gmusicbrowser_1.1.10-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmusicbrowser/+bug/1234448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1234448] Re: Encoding errors in gmusicbrowser_1.1.10-0ubuntu1
I found the file gmusicbrowser_1.1.10-2.dsc here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmusicbrowser/1.1.10-2 Is this the patch? What do I do with it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234448 Title: Encoding errors in gmusicbrowser_1.1.10-0ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmusicbrowser/+bug/1234448/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293220] Re: kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup
among things NOT working due to the upgrade is the network can not use my system what so ever.. Yes I can use the recovery prompt... but I do not see how I can transfer these files in a easy way... (no I do not have a floppy) I will see what I can do with a USB stick Wy wife will kill me since now the system will be down (not funny :) -- kernel log daemon error and stalls for 5 mins during startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157777] Re: gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup
Update from me (feel free to request more date if needed) I thought I avoided the freezing by removing my nvidia card, the system has worked OK for a wile now. But now after chaning the driver to my internal AMD X1250 card to the fglrx driver I got back to old issue connected with the 4GB ram.. did a lot of testing back and forth... got kernel errors and error saing something like CPU0 locked/freexed process 1234 for 11 sec (just before the whole system froze). Then I removed 2GB (leaving 2GB on the system). Everyting worked great again... no change to any drivers or anything. I would bet that the system would now also accept my nvidia card without problems. My conclution (or thougt) is that the issue is that something in the system (kernel, or a module??) does not handle 4GB RAm in a correct way. ( I did test with a diffrent disk (installing XP on it) and the system ran just fine (with 4GB ram). Reminder my issues started when moving from 1GB to 4 GB... Feels wrong to have a 2GB of RAM on the table.. not on the system... -- gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221746] Re: Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled
Same problem - How do I apply the patch? -- Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221746] Re: Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled
Thx for the fast answer - next lame question... :) Do I need to install virt-manager again? from the source? Very greatful for the help. -- Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221746] Re: Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled
OK - Cannot get it sovled... 1. I did the patch command as stated above. 2. I have done a copy from the source files to the accuall diffrent catalogs 3. I ran ./autobuild.py 4. tested with and without kernel / HW acceleration Still cannot get passed the storage step. Ps. I have sucssesfully created a virtual mashine with qemu and started it with kvm outside of virt-manager (my CPU is a AMD X2 4400+, and I am running x86_64 version of Hardy) Uname -a Linux amanda 2.6.24-16-generic #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 12:47:45 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221746] Re: Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled
My output virt-manager --no-fork Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py, line 295, in forward if(self.validate(notebook.get_current_page()) != True): File /usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py, line 915, in validate self._disk.virtio = self._guest.get_virtio_blk() AttributeError: 'FullVirtGuest' object has no attribute 'get_virtio_blk' Meaning - I do get a error ref to this file as Erik did: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/virtinst/FullVirtGuest.py -- Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 221746] Re: Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled
Work around until this is fixed: use virt-install from the consol, this could be used for a Windows setup (update paths): $virt-install -n WinXP -r 1024 --file /home/user/virtual/winxp.img --file-size=5 --sdl --accelerate -c /path/to/install.iso --os- type=windows --os-variant=winxp use man virt-install for more info -- Assigning storage space fails if acceleration enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221746 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 157777] Re: gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup
Same problem here, system freezes after 2 - 10 min. Started after I added more RAM. Everything worked fine (no freezes past 12 months) this was when my system was running on 1 GB RAM (2x 512). I recently replaced the 2x512MB with 2x2GB modules. The system detects the RAM ok, but as everyone elses explaines above the system freezes. I did tests on the new RAM but found no errors. Then I removed my Nvidia card - then the system worked just fine. My conclution ubuntu does not work well with 4GB ram together with Nvidia. My system: Ubuntu: 7.10 Gutsy (AMD64, x86_64) AMD X2 Dual core 4400+ 2x2GB RAM (DDR2) Nvidia 7300GS 256MB -- gutsy amd64 freeze crash lockup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/15 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
I have write cashe on all my drives (3 drives, diffrent brand):
/dev/sdc:
Model=ST3160812AS , FwRev=3.AAE , SerialNo=
4LS1VZ17
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs RotSpdTol.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6,7
* signifies the current active mode
/dev/sdb:
Model=SAMSUNG HD501LJ , FwRev=CR100-10,
SerialNo=S0MUJ1NP502182
Config={ Fixed }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=34902, SectSize=554, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=16384kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: unknown: ATA/ATAPI-3,4,5,6,7
* signifies the current active mode
/dev/sda:
Model=ST380817AS , FwRev=3.42, SerialNo=
4MR07TJJ
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs RotSpdTol.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=156301488
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: ATA/ATAPI-6 T13 1410D revision 2: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6
* signifies the current active mode
Output of lspci:
lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 Host Bridge
00:01.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI Bridge (Internal gfx)
00:07.0 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI Bridge (PCI Express
Port 3)
00:12.0 SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 Non-Raid-5 SATA
00:13.0 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB (OHCI0)
00:13.1 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB (OHCI1)
00:13.2 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB (OHCI2)
00:13.3 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB (OHCI3)
00:13.4 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB (OHCI4)
00:13.5 USB Controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB Controller (EHCI)
00:14.0 SMBus: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller (rev 14)
00:14.1 IDE interface: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 IDE
00:14.2 Audio device: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia
00:14.3 ISA bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 PCI to LPC Bridge
00:14.4 PCI bridge: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI Bridge
00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
HyperTransport Technology Configuration
00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address
Map
00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM
Controller
00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron]
Miscellaneous Control
01:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon X1200 Series
03:02.0 Ethernet controller: D-Link System Inc DGE-530T Gigabit Ethernet
Adapter (rev 11) (rev 11)
03:05.0 Multimedia video controller: Internext Compression Inc iTVC16 (CX23416)
MPEG-2 Encoder (rev 01)
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
I did a copy between 2 diffrent disk FileSize: 680M Time: real0m54.372s user0m0.036s sys 0m3.752s -- Slow SATA performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
My drives:
/dev/sda:
Model=SAMSUNG HD501LJ , FwRev=CR100-10,
SerialNo=XX
Config={ Fixed }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=34902, SectSize=554, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=DualPortCache, BuffSize=16384kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:120,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: unknown: ATA/ATAPI-3,4,5,6,7
* signifies the current active mode
/dev/sdb:
Model=ST3160812AS , FwRev=3.AAE , SerialNo=
X
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw15uSec Fixed DTR10Mbs RotSpdTol.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=4
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=8192kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=?16?
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=268435455
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2
UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 udma3 udma4 udma5
AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled
Drive conforms to: Unspecified: ATA/ATAPI-1,2,3,4,5,6,7
* signifies the current active mode
--
Slow SATA performance
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 119730] Re: Slow SATA performance
I think my drives also act very slow. I do not know what preformance I could expect, here is some infor: SATA controller: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 Non-Raid-5 SATA sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing cached reads: 1746 MB in 2.00 seconds = 873.15 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 232 MB in 3.03 seconds = 76.61 MB/sec [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo hdparm -tT /dev/sdb /dev/sdb: Timing cached reads: 1248 MB in 2.00 seconds = 624.23 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 162 MB in 3.03 seconds = 53.55 MB/sec uname -r 2.6.22-14-generic Processor: AMD X2 +4400 Moderboard: MSI K9AG NEO-F, AMD 690V+SB600, ATX, Socket-AM2, DDR2, GbLAN, VGA -- Slow SATA performance https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/119730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 148454] Re: htop shows about 50 console-kit-deamon processes that top and ps dont show
Is there a work around for this bug? I have the same issue on my system, 62 process of /usr/sbin/console-kit-deamon. If I remove the fast-user-switch applet will that stop the console-kit- deamon problem? (I did not know that I had this on my panel) will check later if that is the case.. I understand that 'sudo killall console-kit-deamon' will clean out the processes for now, but I guess they will come back... The thing is that i am the only* user. Only= I have some other users like mythtv and so on. I only use the via the console, then via 'sudo su mythtv'. -- htop shows about 50 console-kit-deamon processes that top and ps dont show https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/148454 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 130873] Re: console-kit-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV
After upgrading to version 7.10 i now see 62 processes of console-kit- deamon. So fare I have not seen any effects of this. meaning my system runns OK for now. Is this normal? meaning - should I have 62 process of this instans? -- console-kit-daemon crashed with SIGSEGV https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130873 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103297] Re: Kernel updater doesn't update grub's menu, lst correctly
Same issue here (Feisty Fawn), I loose the correct UUID every time grub updates the menu.lst file. This was triggered after I replaced the system disk with another disk... ever since I get into problem with the menu.lst file. I do not understand the Problem solved quote above, but then again it may be due to my knowlege (or lack of knowlege :) from how grub works. I thing I need to make grub understand what the default value (UUID) should be. -- Kernel updater doesn't update grub's menu,lst correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 103297] Re: Kernel updater doesn't update grub's menu, lst correctly
Problem solved (unconfirmed but likely) in my menu.lst file I had 2 different kopt options defined. These referred to my old UUID, one was a general kopt (affecting all changes) and one was just affecting 2.6 versions of kernels. From my menu.lst: # kopt=root=UUID=3579f529-ca4f-4243-b6aa-f28797f6a7e6 ro # kopt_2_6=root=UUID=3579f529-ca4f-4243-b6aa-f28797f6a7e6 ro I have not confirmed that the issue is solved for me, but I find it likely that it will use the new default UUID the next time and therefore also work.. i hope :) -- Kernel updater doesn't update grub's menu,lst correctly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 117314] Re: latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems
Hello, After upgrading to the latest kernel I aslo hade problems booting on my SATA drive. (Current setup, 2 SATA drives and 1 IDE). I used UUID ref in both fstab and menu.lst before the upgrade. After some investigation I managed to get my mashine to boot, the solution for me was to update the UUID of the drive. Meaning that this seams to have changed after the upgrade. Due to lack of time I have not hade time to correct my fstab yet, but I managed to get the system up and running just before I hade to run to work this morning :) Maybe I am confirming a fact that is already known, but if needed I can provide additional input about my hardware. -- latest kernel(2.6.20-16.28) update gives boot problems https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117314 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
