[Bug 884016] [NEW] Upgrade JabRef to Stable/Released Version
Public bug reported: Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) includes the first beta version of JabRef 2.7. I suggest to provide an update to the stable/released version JabRef 2.7, because some bugs have been fixed in the second beta version (2.7. beta 2) and in the .stable/released version (7.7). Thanks! ** Affects: jabref (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884016 Title: Upgrade JabRef to Stable/Released Version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jabref/+bug/884016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 884016] Re: Upgrade JabRef to Stable/Released Version
** Description changed: Ubuntu 11.10 (Oneiric Ocelot) includes the first beta version of JabRef 2.7. I suggest to provide an update to the stable/released version JabRef 2.7, because some bugs have been fixed in the second beta version - (2.7. beta 2) and in the .stable/released version (7.7). Thanks! + (2.7. beta 2) and in the stable/released version (2.7). Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884016 Title: Upgrade JabRef to Stable/Released Version To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jabref/+bug/884016/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600987] Re: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser
Or should I submit a new bug report as the error message is different now (although the symptom is the same)? ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Expired = New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600987 Title: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/evolution/+bug/600987/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600987] Re: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser
It still does not work in Natty Narwhal (Evolution 2.32.2). However, I get a (partly) different error message now: Could not open the link. Operation not supported. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600987 Title: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526676] Re: [Lucid] PyOS_InputHook is not available for interactive use of PyGTK set_interactive(1)
I can confirm this is also happening in Lucid when running hp-systray -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526676 Title: [Lucid] PyOS_InputHook is not available for interactive use of PyGTK set_interactive(1) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 526676] Re: [Lucid] PyOS_InputHook is not available for interactive use of PyGTK set_interactive(1)
... and the error/warning message is: /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/gtk-2.0/gtk/__init__.py:127: RuntimeWarning: PyOS_InputHook is not available for interactive use of PyGTK set_interactive(1) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526676 Title: [Lucid] PyOS_InputHook is not available for interactive use of PyGTK set_interactive(1) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600987] Re: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser
I have checked this with Gnome now, but I still get the same error message. ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- evolution fails to open URLs in a browser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596449] Re: Titlebars of all windows disappeared
Thanks a lot, Jonathan, for your very helpful comment. Indeed, I installed (by mistake) a package that depended on ubuntu-mobile- default-settings. Removing this package solved the problem :-) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Invalid -- Titlebars of all windows disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 132791] Re: cups smb logon fails quietly
It does not work for me in lucid (KDE, Kubuntu) :-( -- cups smb logon fails quietly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 132791] Re: cups smb logon fails quietly
It does not work for me in lucid (KDE, Kubuntu) :-( -- cups smb logon fails quietly https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132791 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600987] [NEW] evolution fails to open URLs in a browser
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution When I click on a URL in evolution, the error message 'Could not open the link. Failed to execute child process midbrowser (No such file or directory)' pops up. This problem is perfectly reproducible, it *always* occurs when clicking on a URL in evolution. I use evolution on my KDE desktop. Initially, I installed Kubuntu 9.10. Then, I upgraded to 10.04. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: evolution 2.28.3-0ubuntu10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jul 2 12:40:09 2010 InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5) ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_DK.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- evolution fails to open URLs in a browser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 600987] Re: evolution fails to open URLs in a browser
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51282587/Dependencies.txt -- evolution fails to open URLs in a browser https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600987 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
Yes, the problem is not 100% fixed: Now I experience this problem no longer always but still sometimes. In contrast to bve (#29), it takes even longer until I can log in (up to 1 minute) on my computer (Dell Latidtude D630, Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG [Golan] Network Connection (rev 02)). I will check if this problem is related to wifi. -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596449] Re: Titlebars of all windows disappeared
Any ideas how I could (try to) get back my titlebars? -- Titlebars of all windows disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596449] [NEW] Titlebars of all windows disappeared
Public bug reported: I installed Kubuntu 9.10, upgraded to 10.04, installed many gnome packages, chose the Gnome desktop at the log-in, and worked a few days with Gnome. Then suddenly the titlebars of all windows disappeared and all windows are maximized (even the small windows e.g. for asking for a password or so). Neither logging-out and re-logging-in nor restarting the computer solved this problem. Then I logged in into KDE again but also in KDE all title bars disappeared and all windows are maximized. How can I get back my titlebars? ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Titlebars of all windows disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 596449] Re: Titlebars of all windows disappeared
I have installed and used only KDE and Gnome, and I turned off all desktop effects (long before the problem occurred). -- Titlebars of all windows disappeared https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
I just tried again to suspend my laptop computer by closing the lid -- and I discovered that the problem has disappeared :-) Maybe one of the (kernel?) updated has solved this problem (see bve's comment #27). Thanks a lot for fixing this! -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
I have still the same problem (Ubuntu 9.10, all updates). I will try what you suggested. -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483505] Re: Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set
Thanks for your response. Unfortunately, I cannot check this now, because I don't want to upgrade my production systems to an unstable version. However, I guess that several people who are on the also notified list and hence, receive this email have installed lucid. Can anyone of these people please check if gnome-keyring asks to set a new password (in a KDE session) after filling-in account details (including the password) in evolution when no password for gnome-keyring was set before -- e.g. by creating a new user? Thanks! -- Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
Bob, I totally agree with you! Scott, If this bug report is a duplicate, then set the status to Duplicate, *not* Invalid. -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
Given that so many people report and confirm this bug, I have changed the status to Confirmed. -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
Scott, Why do you change the status back to Invalid? Either the error message is true (then there is a bug in ureadahead) or the error message is wrong (then there is a bug in the reporting system). How can there be an error message without an error? -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
Although the error message init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 seems to be not related to errors that prevents one from logging in, this error message is still shown on many systems (on the 8th console, Ctrl-Tab-F8). It is shown on my system although all file systems are on a single internal hard disk. Hence, I don't think that these bug reports are invalid. ** Changed in: ureadahead (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Confirmed -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
So who is the culprit that prints this error message? Why is there an error message about ureadahead? Is there a problem with ureadahead or not? -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483359] Re: scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup
zasq, you could try the solution posted at: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1343648 -- scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
I found out something important: The problem occurs only if I suspend the laptop computers to RAM by closing the lid. However, if I click on the K button (KDE's Kickoff Application Launcher), choose Leave and Sleep, wait a few seconds until I close the lid, and then resume it by opening the lid again, everything is okay and I can unlock the machine almost immediately. -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
Unfortunately, I have the same problem on the newly installed system on my Dell Latitude D630 now :-( The problem came (back) in early December after updating (apt-get upgrade) and rebooting the system. I reboot my laptop very seldom and I do not remember which updates I installed before I rebooted the system; IIRC, sreadahead and ureadahead where among them. -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483359] Re: scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup
I would not mark this issue as invalid, because I had this problem as well and finally my system became even unusable (which is very bad since I have to use it for my work). So, I had to re-install Kubuntu 9.10 and everything runs fine now. Since this issue and a few other problems occurred after upgrading from 9.04 (Jaunty) to 9.10 (Karmic), I think that it is caused by a bug in the (dist-)upgrade procedure. BTW: I originally installed Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) on this computer, then changed to Kubuntu and then upgraded to 9.04 (Jaunty). All this worked fine but I mention it here, because the upgrade to 9.10 (Karmic) might be affected by the previous upgrade. I have the non-working system still installed on another partition. So please let me know if you have any questions. -- scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484677] Re: init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4
I had the same (or at least similar) problem. On my computer (Dell laptop D630, intel graphic) this error occurs at every boot. I get a black screen with a white (non-flashing) underscore in the top-left so that I cannot log in any more -- also the text/console login does not work and even the failsafe mode fails. If I add the kernel option i915.modeset=0 in GRUB to the failsafe mode, I still cannot log in after boot but I can see the start-up messages, where the last line is init: ureadahead-other main process (762) terminated with status 4. Hence, I was really locked out from my own computer :-( So, I had to re-install Kubuntu 9.10 and everything runs fine now. Since this issue and a few other problems occurred after upgrading from 9.04 (Jaunty) to 9.10 (Karmic), I think that it is caused by a bug in the (dist-)upgrade procedure. BTW: I originally installed Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) on this computer, then changed to Kubuntu and then upgraded to 9.04 (Jaunty). All this worked fine but I mention it here, because the upgrade to 9.10 (Karmic) might be affected by the previous upgrade. I have the non-working system still installed on another partition. So please let me know if you have any questions. I reported this problem also as comments to bug #483359 and bug #483429. -- init: ureadahead-other main process terminated with status 4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484677 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
Since a bug in (K)Ubuntu made my Dell Latitude D630 laptop unusable (see my comments to bug #483359 and bug #483429), I re-installed Kubuntu 9.10 (Karmic). Luckily, the problem does not occur in the newly installed system. Since this issue (and a few other problems) occurred after upgrading from 9.04 (Jaunty) to 9.10 (Karmic) and does not occur in a freshly installed system, this problem is probably caused by a bug in the (dist-)upgrade procedure. BTW: I originally installed Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) on this computer, then changed to Kubuntu, and then upgraded to 9.04 (Jaunty). All this worked fine but I mention it here, because the upgrade to 9.10 (Karmic) might be affected by the previous upgrade. I have the non-working system still installed on another partition and the problem is still present on the Lenovo ThinkPad T400. So please let me know if you have any questions. -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
No ideas or solutions yet? Please let me know if I can somehow support you to fix this annoying bug. BTW: On the Dell Latitude D630 laptop, an error message An unknown error occurred while Suspend to RAM. The errorcode is: '1' is shown after unlocking the screen after resume. The window title is Error while Suspend to RAM - KPowersafe. I have attached (the last part of) the log file /var/log/pm-suspend.log. Maybe this helps you to find the cause of the problem. ** Attachment added: pm-suspend.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35965613/pm-suspend.log -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483505] [NEW] Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-keyring I have Kubuntu-karmic (9.10) and now I want to use evolution on my KDE desktop. After installing and starting evolution and filling-in my account details (including the password), a message popped up and asked for my gnome-keyring password, although I did not set a password for gnome-keyring so far. Finally, I deleted (renamed) the folder ~/.gnome2/keyrings/; after deleting this folder, evolution asked me to set a new password for gnome-keyring and everything seems to work fine so far. However, this took me some time to figure out and some less experienced users might not figure this out. So please fix this. Thanks! ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 16 10:29:30 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: gnome-keyring 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: gnome-keyring Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 XsessionErrors: (polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1:17163): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_once_init_leave: assertion `initialization_value != 0' failed ** Affects: gnome-keyring (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: i386 -- Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483505] Re: Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35744778/Dependencies.txt -- Question for gnome-keyring password although it has not been set https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483505 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483359] Re: scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup
I managed to get a login-screen again (probably by booting from a Live- CD, switching to the Ubuntu system by chroot, and removing and re- installing the packages sreadahead and ureadahead), but I still see on the 8th console (Ctrl-Alt-F8): fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 /dev/sda1: clean, [...] fsck from util-linux-ng 2.16 * Stopping the Firestarter firewall... /dev/sda6: clean, [...] init: ureadahead-other main process (924) terminated with status 4 * Preparing restricted drivers... [...] ...done. Maybe this helps you to find the problem. -- scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483359] Re: scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup
I got the same (or at least similar) problem (error message) after my last upgrade (kernel + sreadahead + new package ureadahead). However, on my computer (Dell laptop D630, intel graphic) this error occurs at every boot. I get a black screen so that I cannot log in any more -- also the text/console login does not work and even the failsafe mode fails. If I add the kernel option i915.modeset=0 in GRUB to the failsafe mode, I still cannot log in after boot but I can see the start-up messages, where the last line is init: ureadahead-other main process (762) terminated with status 4. Hence, I am really locked out from my own computer :-( Please help. Thanks, Arne. -- scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] Re: Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35740967/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35740968/XsessionErrors.txt -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483429] [NEW] Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM
Public bug reported: The problem started after upgrading from Kubuntu-jaunty to kubuntu- karmic. After resume from suspend-to-RAM, I have to wait a very long time (approx. 1 minute) until can I do anything, because the computer is reacting neither to the mouse nor to the keyboard. This happend on a Lenovo ThinkPad T400 (with intel graphics). I did not find anything suspicious in /var/log/pm-suspend.log. On another computer (Dell Latitude D630, intel graphics), the same problem occurred also after upgrading from Kubuntu-jaunty to Kubuntu- karmic. However, on this computer, I found the line /usr/lib/pm-utils/sleep.d/99video resume suspend : Returned exit code 1. in /var/log/pm-suspend.log. Unfortunately, another (or a related?) bug made this computer currently unusable (see my comment to bug #483359: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/e2fsprogs/+bug/483359 ). I hope that you can fix this. Thanks! Please let me know if you need further imformation. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 16 07:00:46 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: konqueror 4:4.3.2-0ubuntu3 ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE= LANG=de_DE.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: kdebase Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- Long waiting time after resume from suspend-to-RAM https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483429 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483359] Re: scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup
Is it possible that this bug is somehow related to the bug that I reported as bug #483429 ? -- scheduled fsck crashes preventing bootup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483359 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297976] Re: kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex
Thanks for the hint. pinentry-qt was indeed not installed. However, installing this did not solve the problem :-( Following the instructions on http://developer.gauner.org/kmail-pgpmime/index.en.html (suggested above by Volker Lanz) also did not solve the problem: $ echo test | gpg -ase -r 0xDEADBEEF | gpg works but kmail still does not ask for a passphrase :-( :-( :-( -- kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297976] Re: kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex
I have the same problem on another computer where Intrepid Ibex has been newly installed (no upgrade): Kmail does not ask for a passphrase and hence, I cannot sign my emails :-( Is there a workaround until this bug has been fixed? -- kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdepim in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 260326] Re: I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy)
Mekk wrote: sudo apt-get install kdelibs4c2a wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679965/kdiff3_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_i386.deb wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13473685/libkonq4_3.5.9-0ubuntu7_i386.deb wget http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10679966/kdiff3-doc_0.9.92-2ubuntu1_all.deb dpkg -i *.deb Thank you, Mekk, for posting this simple solution! It works great! Anyway, I hope a KDE4 version of KDiff3 (or -- preliminary -- the old KDE3 version and libkonq4_3.5.9) will be added to the universe repository for Intrepid soon. KDiff3 is really the best diff and merge utility on Earth! Arne -- I can't install kdiff3 on Intrepid (Broken dependecy) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/260326 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 280762] Re: knetworkmanager under kde4 doesn't recognize the static IP connections that I have configured.
Frank wrote: Try editing /etc/NetworkManager/nm-system-settings.conf. In section [ifupdown], set managed=true. Thank you, Frank, for posting this solution. It works great! I suggest that the Ubuntu team should change the default setting of managed to true. Or does this have any undesirable side effects? Arne -- knetworkmanager under kde4 doesn't recognize the static IP connections that I have configured. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296223] Re: annoying dialog appears Monitor setup has changed kde4
I have noticed the same bug on my computer after upgrading from Hardy Heron to Intrepid Ibex. It is really annoying and it happens randomly (often twice in quick succession). Please tell me, if you need any files or information on my system. -- annoying dialog appears Monitor setup has changed kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296223] Re: annoying dialog appears Monitor setup has changed kde4
I can confirm this bug ** Changed in: kdebase-workspace (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- annoying dialog appears Monitor setup has changed kde4 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296223 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 297976] [NEW] kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: kdepim After upgrading my Kubuntu to from Hardy Heron to Intrepid Ibex (KDE 3.5.10 - KDE 4.1.2), I cannot sign emails any more. Kmail/Kontact does not ask for the passphrase and hence returns the error message Signieren fehlgeschlagen: Bad passphrase (~Signing failed: Bad passphrase). ** Affects: kdepim (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- kmail: cannot sign emails after upgradind to intrepid ibex https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297976 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 251649] Re: Firefox: Address line does not work
I have a very similar problem: Sometimes when I write or copy a URL into the address field and then press ENTER, Firefox does not react. I have to close and restart Firefox to get rid of this problem. In contrast to Björn, this problem occurs only from time to time on my machines, I do not have many add-ons installed, and there is no output on the “Error Console” (“Fehlerkonsole”) when I press ENTER. I have noticed this on three different machines. All have Kubuntu 8.04 installed (one update from older Kubuntus, two fresh installs). This morning I have updated Firefox 3.0 to version 3.0.1 using the usual Kubuntu update procedure, but I this problem occurred again. -- Firefox: Address line does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251649 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
