[Bug 1799434] [NEW] lam4-dev fails to install

2018-10-23 Thread OpenCPU
Public bug reported:

Installing `lam4-dev` in a clean Ubuntu Bionic or Cosmic fails as below.
Which dependency is missing?

Preparing to unpack .../lam4-dev_7.1.4-3.1build1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking lam4-dev (7.1.4-3.1build1) ...
Setting up lam4-dev (7.1.4-3.1build1) ...
update-alternatives: using /usr/include/lam to provide /usr/include/mpi 
(mpi) in auto mode
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpicc.1.gz because associated file 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpicc.lam.1.gz (of link group mpi) doesn't exist
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpif77.1.gz because associated file 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpif77.lam.1.gz (of link group mpi) doesn't exist
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpiCC.1.gz because associated file 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpiCC.lam.1.gz (of link group mpi) doesn't exist
update-alternatives: warning: skip creation of 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpic++.1.gz because associated file 
/usr/share/man/man1/mpic++.lam.1.gz (of link group mpi) doesn't exist
update-alternatives: error: alternative path 
/usr/share/man/man3/MPI_Comm_set_name_lam4-dev.3.gz doesn't exist
dpkg: error processing package lam4-dev (--configure):
 installed lam4-dev package post-installation script subprocess 
returned error exit status 2
Processing triggers for man-db (2.8.3-2) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
 lam4-dev
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

** Affects: lam (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1799434

Title:
  lam4-dev fails to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lam/+bug/1799434/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768130] Re: libssh-dev libraries are returning a different version from package

2018-05-29 Thread OpenCPU
Running into this as well. The 0.8.0 branch has renamed
'ssh_get_publickey' to 'ssh_get_server_publickey' however it is not
possible to test for this in the macro because from the headers is looks
like we are running libssh 0.7.0.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768130

Title:
  libssh-dev libraries are returning a different version from package

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libssh/+bug/1768130/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1717895] [NEW] update to jq-1.5+dfsg-2 on xenial

2017-09-18 Thread OpenCPU
Public bug reported:

I would like to request to update the 'jq' package in ubuntu xenial from
1.5+dfsg-1 to 1.5+dfsg-2.

The reason is that the old version is missing the libjq-dev library and
headers. These were added in 1.5+dfsg-2 however currently this is only
available on Ubuntu Zesty. It would be really useful to update this in
Xenial (perhaps even trusty-backports).

I don't think there will be any side effects as the code has not
changed.

** Affects: jq (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1717895

Title:
  update to  jq-1.5+dfsg-2 on xenial

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jq/+bug/1717895/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1626773] Re: CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec

2016-09-23 Thread OpenCPU
Yes, the problem seems to be fixed. Thank you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626773

Title:
  CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1626773/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1626773] Re: CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec broken in 1.0.1

2016-09-23 Thread OpenCPU
Below a minimal example:
https://gist.github.com/jeroenooms/cc9391276b160404c5a635f961bc06f6


** Summary changed:

- CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec broken in 1.0.1 
+ CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626773

Title:
  CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1626773/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1626773] [NEW] CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec broken in 1.0.1

2016-09-22 Thread OpenCPU
Public bug reported:

My software which links to libcrypto stopped working on both Ubuntu
12.04 / 14.04 / 16.04 last week.

The problem is that BN_bn2dec returns NULL all the time (without setting
an error message) even for valid input values. I think is a bug in
CVE-2016-2182.patch.

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626773

Title:
  CVE-2016-2182.patch has broken BN_bn2dec broken in 1.0.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1626773/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
Can you be more specific in which way the libapache2-mod-r-base package
is not following guidelines?

Also the problem still remains that the package 'apache2-prefork-dev'
exists but is broken. It seems you need to either completely remove this
package, or add something like:

Provides: apache2-prefork-dev
Replaces: apache2-prefork-dev

To your apache2-dev control file.

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
In that case, perhaps you can help me suggest how I should specify my
build-depends such that apache2-prefork-dev can correctly be resolved?

Currently the control file is as follows, which does not resolve, even
though there is no version of apache2-prefork-dev specified:
https://github.com/jeffreyhorner/rapache/blob/master/debian/control

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
It's additional work to maintain separate packages for different
releases. If possible, I would like to have a single source package that
builds with either Apache 2.2 or Apache 2.4.

In general it seems to me that you don't want to break all current
packages with a dependency on `apache2-prefork-dev`. Somewhere in your
repo there is still an old and broken version of `apache2-prefork-dev`
that you need to clean up, such that apt will instead use `apache2-dev`
which provides `apache2-prefork-dev.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to apache2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
Can you be more specific in which way the libapache2-mod-r-base package
is not following guidelines?

Also the problem still remains that the package 'apache2-prefork-dev'
exists but is broken. It seems you need to either completely remove this
package, or add something like:

Provides: apache2-prefork-dev
Replaces: apache2-prefork-dev

To your apache2-dev control file.

** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
In that case, perhaps you can help me suggest how I should specify my
build-depends such that apache2-prefork-dev can correctly be resolved?

Currently the control file is as follows, which does not resolve, even
though there is no version of apache2-prefork-dev specified:
https://github.com/jeffreyhorner/rapache/blob/master/debian/control

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1206114] Re: Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

2013-07-31 Thread OpenCPU
It's additional work to maintain separate packages for different
releases. If possible, I would like to have a single source package that
builds with either Apache 2.2 or Apache 2.4.

In general it seems to me that you don't want to break all current
packages with a dependency on `apache2-prefork-dev`. Somewhere in your
repo there is still an old and broken version of `apache2-prefork-dev`
that you need to clean up, such that apt will instead use `apache2-dev`
which provides `apache2-prefork-dev.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206114

Title:
  Package apache2-prefork-dev broken in Saucy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1206114/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 924043] [NEW] mod_proxy_ajp DENIED over ipv6

2012-01-30 Thread OpenCPU
Public bug reported:

I use Apache2 and mod_proxy_ajp to proxy requests to Tomcat. Apache is
sandboxed with mod_apparmor. Everything works OK when the host has a
valid ipv4 address. However when used inside parallels with only a LAN
address, the proxy returns empty pages.

When looking at /var/log/kern.log, I see the line below. aa-logprof
doesn't know what to do with it. I suspect that it is due to parallels
assigning a ipv6 lan address instead of ipv4.

Jan 30 14:48:32 John-Ubuntu-Desktop kernel: [   86.853082] type=1400
audit(1327963712.880:54): apparmor=DENIED operation=recvmsg parent=1686 
profile=/usr/lib/apache2/mpm-prefork/apache2//DEFAULT_URI pid=1696
comm=apache2 laddr=:::127.0.0.1 lport=80 faddr=:::127.0.0.1
fport=59686 family=inet6 sock_type=stream protocol=6

** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/924043

Title:
  mod_proxy_ajp DENIED over ipv6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/924043/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 711567] Re: Double window controls in Chromium after enabling Use System Title Bar and Borders

2011-11-08 Thread OpenCPU
Same in Ubuntu 11.10 Unity 3D. Very annoying.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/711567

Title:
  Double window controls in Chromium after enabling Use System Title
  Bar and Borders

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/chromium-browser/+bug/711567/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs