[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-02-14 Thread Edwin Peer
Regarding your question about LLDP and IPv6...

The default Ubuntu 18.04.3 configuration has an IPv6 enabled kernel, but
the interface only has the default link local address configured. I've
seen it do router solicitation on link state changes and periodically
thereafter. I think I recall seeing somewhere above that you were going
to try without IPv6. Have you seen different behavior with IPv6
disabled?

I don't expect to see LLDP because I have the two NICs wired directly to
each other, back to back. I'm not running any LLDP daemon on the host.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-02-14 Thread Edwin Peer
The tpa_aborts shouldn't be a concern. They merely indicate that a TCP
flow could not be aggregated. That could have a performance impact, of
course, but that should manifest as counted drops somewhere if this were
the case.

Importantly, the tpa_aborts only apply to TCP traffic, but you see the
problem for ICMP and UDP too.

Note, the tpa_aborts also appear to be evident on the primary as active
interface while things are working as expected. A difference in
magnitude tpa_aborts from one test run to another may be a clue about
something else that's happening though, but I'm not sure that we are
comparing apples to apples with respect the ethtool -S dumps posted thus
far (when were they captured relative to the test runs, which interface
was active at the time, etc?).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-02-13 Thread Edwin Peer
I have tried, unsuccessfully, to reproduce this issue internally.
Details of my setup below.

1) I have a pair of Dell R210 servers racked (u072 and u073 below), each
with a BCM57416 installed:

root@u072:~# lspci | grep BCM57416
01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries BCM57416 
NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet Controller (rev 01)
01:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries BCM57416 
NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet Controller (rev 01)

2) I've matched the firmware version to one that Nivedita reported in a
bad system:

root@u072:~# ethtool -i enp1s0f0np0
driver: bnxt_en
version: 1.10.0
firmware-version: 214.0.253.1/pkg 21.40.25.31
expansion-rom-version: 
bus-info: :01:00.0
supports-statistics: yes
supports-test: yes
supports-eeprom-access: yes
supports-register-dump: no
supports-priv-flags: no

3) Matched Ubuntu release and kernel version:

root@u072:~# lsb_release -dr
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS
Release:18.04

root@u072:~# uname -a
Linux u072 5.0.0-37-generic #40~18.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Nov 14 12:06:39 UTC 2019 
x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

4) Configured the interface into an active-backup bond:

root@u072:~# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0
Ethernet Channel Bonding Driver: v3.7.1 (April 27, 2011)

Bonding Mode: fault-tolerance (active-backup)
Primary Slave: None
Currently Active Slave: enp1s0f1np1
MII Status: up
MII Polling Interval (ms): 100
Up Delay (ms): 0
Down Delay (ms): 0

Slave Interface: enp1s0f1np1
MII Status: up
Speed: 1 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 1
Permanent HW addr: 00:0a:f7:a7:10:61
Slave queue ID: 0

Slave Interface: enp1s0f0np0
MII Status: up
Speed: 1 Mbps
Duplex: full
Link Failure Count: 1
Permanent HW addr: 00:0a:f7:a7:10:60
Slave queue ID: 0

5) Run the provided mtr and netperf test cases with the 1st port
selected as active:

root@u072:~# ip l set enp1s0f1np1 down
root@u072:~# ip l set enp1s0f1np1 up
root@u072:~# cat /proc/net/bonding/bond0 | grep Active
Currently Active Slave: enp1s0f0np0

a) initiated on u072:

root@u072:~# mtr --no-dns --report --report-cycles 60 192.168.1.2
Start: 2020-02-13T20:48:01+
HOST: u072Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.20.0%600.2   0.2   0.2   0.2   0.0

root@u072:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.2 -- -r 1,1
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 
bytes  Bytes  bytesbytes   secs.per sec   

16384  131072 11   10.0029040.91   
16384  87380

root@u072:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.2 -- -r 64,64
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 
bytes  Bytes  bytesbytes   secs.per sec   

16384  131072 64   64  10.0028633.36   
16384  87380 

root@u072:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.2 -- -r 128,8192
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.2 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 
bytes  Bytes  bytesbytes   secs.per sec   

16384  131072 128  819210.0017469.30   
16384  87380

b) initiated on u073:

root@u073:~# mtr --no-dns --report --report-cycles 60 192.168.1.1
Start: 2020-02-13T20:53:37+
HOST: u073Loss%   Snt   Last   Avg  Best  Wrst StDev
  1.|-- 192.168.1.10.0%600.1   0.1   0.1   0.2   0.0

root@u073:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.1 -- -r 1,1
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.1 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 
bytes  Bytes  bytesbytes   secs.per sec   

16384  87380  11   10.0028514.93   
16384  131072

root@u073:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.1 -- -r 64,64
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.1 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 
bytes  Bytes  bytesbytes   secs.per sec   

16384  87380  64   64  10.0027405.88   
16384  131072

root@u073:~# netperf -t TCP_RR -H 192.168.1.1 -- -r 128,8192
MIGRATED TCP REQUEST/RESPONSE TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 
192.168.1.1 () port 0 AF_INET : demo : first burst 0
Local /Remote
Socket Size   Request  Resp.   Elapsed  Trans.
Send   Recv   Size SizeTime Rate 

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-02-11 Thread Edwin Peer
Hi Nivedita,

I have been away on PTO the last week and am picking this up again now.
Please could you post the full bonding configuration?

Regards,
Edwin Peer

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-01-31 Thread Edwin Peer
I don't think bnxt_en exposes the disable_tpa parameter. Be that as it
may, I think the tpa_aborts may be a red herring. TPA aggregates TCP
flows and you are seeing the issue with ICMP.

In which direction(s) of traffic flow do you see the losses?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-01-30 Thread Edwin Peer
> 3. mtr ping test
> ---
> GoodSystem..0.0% Loss; 0.2 Avg; 0.1 Best, 0.9 Worst, 0.1 StdDev
> BadSystem2...11.7% Loss; 0.1 Avg; 0.1 Best, 0.2 Worst, 0.0 StdDev

The mtr packet loss is an interesting result. What mtr options did you
use? Is this a UDP or ICMP test?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-01-30 Thread Edwin Peer
With respect to one of these situations, this is the following system:

> Dell PowerEdge R440/0XP8V5, BIOS 2.2.11 06/14/2019
> 
> Note that a similar system does not have any issues:
> 
> Dell Inc. PowerEdge R430/0CN7X8, BIOS 2.3.4 11/08/2016
> 
> So the NIC in the "bad" environment is:
> 
> BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet Controller (rev 01)
> Product Name: Broadcom Adv. Dual 10G SFP+ Ethernet
> 
> The NIC in the "good" environment is:
> 
> Broadcom Inc. and subsidiaries NetXtreme II BCM57810
> 10 Gigabit Ethernet [14e4:1006]
> Product Name: QLogic 57810 10 Gigabit Ethernet

There are more than one variable at play here. Does the problem follow
the NIC if you swap the NICs between systems? Are OS / kernel and driver
versions the same on both systems?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-01-28 Thread Edwin Peer
I am an engineer at Broadcom and have been assigned to investigate this
issue. To that end, I have a few clarifying questions:

1a) What is the benchmark tool you are using and could you provide a
link to where I can get it?

 b) What kind of network traffic is it sending?

2a) In what units are the data rate parameters "--rx_rate 10e6 --tx_rate
10e6" specified?

 b) What data rate are you attempting to send? The report notes that the
platform can't be the issue at 1G, but are you attempting to utilize
10G?

3) Perhaps stating the obvious here, but has anybody looked into the
warning?

"[WARNING] [UHD] Unable to set the thread priority. Performance may be
negatively affected."

which is probably related to this error:

"EnvironmentError: OSError: error in pthread_setschedparam"

4 a) I am personally unfamiliar with the USRP x310, could you provide
some more information about it? Googling for it seems to indicate it is
some kind of software defined radio platform?

  b) Is there a way to get access to one to reproduce and diagnose this
issue?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1853638] Re: BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be dropping data

2020-01-28 Thread Edwin Peer
Could you also please dump the ethtool statistics for the NIC?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1853638

Title:
  BCM57416 NetXtreme-E Dual-Media 10G RDMA Ethernet device seems to be
  dropping data

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1853638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1718172] [NEW] Upgrade to Ubuntu 17.04 crashes despite all tentatives

2017-09-19 Thread Peer Davidsson
Public bug reported:

When I tried to upgrade my Yakkety (16.10) to Zesty (17.04), the interface 
reports a bug in calculating changes because try to upgrade from developmental 
version of the system. I've done this from 12.04 to 13.04 and so on until the 
16.10 So I don't really see the point of this note. Could it be that I use an 
unsupported packages in my system ? So far I found only openoffice packages to 
be unofficial in my PC.
Thanks

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.10
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:16.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-59.64-generic 4.8.17
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-59-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8.7
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Tue Sep 19 12:05:43 2017
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-07-29 (416 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.1 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160719)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to yakkety on 2017-09-19 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade yakkety

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1718172

Title:
  Upgrade to Ubuntu 17.04 crashes despite all tentatives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1718172/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1321414] Re: Free space on local ssh server is incorrectly reported as 0 (leads to failed backup due to not enough free space)

2014-08-08 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321414

Title:
  Free space on local ssh server is incorrectly reported  as 0 (leads to
  failed backup due to not enough free space)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1321414/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1316679] Re: Backup over FTP fails with Generic error if file cannot be closed (gio backend)

2014-08-08 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1316679

Title:
  Backup over FTP fails with Generic error if file cannot be closed (gio
  backend)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1316679/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1353468] Re: Scheduled backup without user logged in

2014-08-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue.

It is a kind-of bug: sbackup uses GIO/GVFS as default backend to
access remote location e.g. over FTP. The gvfs-daemon, in turn, is
started via Dbus on user login, so it is not running without user
session. For reference see
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1924017 Gvfs exports dbus
services and thus should be actually started by dbus (see
http://superuser.com/questions/228261/how-to-properly-start-gvfs-
without-gnome)

As a workaround I suggest to use the FUSE backend implemented in
sbackup. Please follow the instructions at
https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+faq/1326 to enable the FUSE
backend.

HTH!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1353468

Title:
  Scheduled backup without user logged in

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1353468/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1336505] Re: missing man page

2014-08-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Any help is
appreciated. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1336505

Title:
  missing man page

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1336505/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 217269] Re: Firefox contains builtin certificate from ISP

2014-07-22 Thread Peer
Managing Certificates currently is still too complicated.

I started to look into the issue, but there is a wall of complication
before anyone who want's to know more about which certificates there
are, where they come from, etc.

In this beginning post-Snowden era handling trust should be completely
transparent and open to the user and she should be given understandable
und easy-to-use options about who get's which trust.

So yes, this bug is even more current then before, and handling of
certificates should ne be underhanded in any way, the same applies to
information disclosures, tracking, privacy, etc.

The browser should offer all information about all certificates, and not
only the certificates but also any details submitted during the
certificate inclusion process, in an easy to use and easy to grasp
manner.

Chainings should be displayed in a graphical manner, and the details
should be easily accessible and offered for inspection of just anybody.

The problem with all this spying and privacy invasion stuff is not that
it's totally hidden, but that it's difficult enough to access and see
for common people who don't know enough about it, so the spies can act
covertly because nobody can easily direct their attention to it. So that
directing of attention should be facilitated by an easy to use, up to
date and clear GUI.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/217269

Title:
  Firefox contains builtin certificate from ISP

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/217269/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1328798] Re: Setting default printer does not work

2014-06-29 Thread Peer
Indeed, changing the ~/.cups/lpoptions did the trick.

So this bug is a documentation bug and a false pretense bug because
the dialog for setting the default printer only pretends to set the
default printer, and doesn't tell anything about the other influences.

I even wonder now which setting the dialog influences anyway.

So I for now am happy,
but the problem I ran into is not solved at all because the dialog and the 
mecanisms are neither clear nor functional.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328798

Title:
  Setting default printer does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1328798/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1328798] [NEW] Setting default printer does not work

2014-06-11 Thread Peer
Public bug reported:

Setting default printer does not work.

This is a nagging bug because it's affecting a commonly used, basic
function.

This bug persisted for a long time already.
Upgrading from 13.10 to 14.04 did not help.

In my system, there are three configured printers: 1) a locally
connected one (which can be absent or not at boot) - 2) the same printer
accessed over the network at another computer - 3) another network
printer.

Printer 3 should be the default printer, e.g. the one which is
preselected when opening any print dialogue.

One can set a default printer in system settings - printer. I did this
many times. The check box is set (and is still set when re-entering the
dialogue later or another time), but each time a print dialogue is
accessed in any program, another printer is preselected and not printer
3.

One can also set a default printer in the cups admin dialogue. This did
not change the behavior. The desired printer is marked as default
printer in the cups admin interface, but each time a print dialogue is
accessed in e.g. okular, another printer is preselected. So one has to
select each time the desired printer.

Not having to do that each time is what the setting default printer
(by whatever dialogue) is for, but it simply does not work.

One thing I noticed is that in the /etc/cups/printers.conf, the desired
printer (3) is marked as DefaultPrinter Kyocera, but the closing tag
in this file is not named /DefaultPrinter as one would expect but just
/Printer.

Maybe there is a conflict between two different systems for setting a
default printer (cups vs. system settings)?

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  Setting default printer does not work.
  
  This is a nagging bug because it's affecting a commonly used, basic
  function.
  
  This bug persisted for a long time already.
  Upgrading from 13.10 to 14.04 did not help.
  
  In my system, there are three configured printers: 1) a locally
  connected one (which can be absent or not at boot) - 2) the same printer
  accessed over the network at another computer - 3) another network
  printer.
  
  Printer 3 should be the default printer, e.g. the one which is
  preselected when opening any print dialogue.
  
  One can set a default printer in system settings - printer. I did this
  many times. The check box is set (and is still set when re-entering the
  dialogue later or another time), but each time a print dialogue is
  accessed in any program, another printer is preselected and not printer
  3.
  
  One can also set a default printer in the cups admin dialogue. This did
  not change the behavior. The desired printer is marked as default
  printer in the cups admin interface, but each time a print dialogue is
  accessed in e.g. okular, another printer is preselected. So one has to
  select each time the desired printer.
  
  Not having to do that each time is what the setting default printer
  (by whatever dialogue) is for, but it simply does not work.
  
  One thing I noticed is that in the /etc/cups/printers.conf, the desired
  printer (3) is marked as DefaultPrinter Kyocera, but the closing tag
- in this not named /DefaultPrinter put just /Printer.
+ in this file is not named /DefaultPrinter as one would expect but just
+ /Printer.
  
  Maybe there is a conflict between two different systems for setting a
  default printer (cups vs. system settings)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328798

Title:
  Setting default printer does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1328798/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1328138] Re: md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

2014-06-09 Thread Peer
resulting file means: the file resulting from piping the output of
said md5deep run into a file with appending  resultingfile.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328138

Title:
  md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/md5deep/+bug/1328138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1328138] [NEW] md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

2014-06-09 Thread Peer
Public bug reported:

md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums in the terminal
window

Sometimes lines are preceded by spaces, sometimes there is extra text
behind the filename.

These scroll out of the window with continuing progress.

The resulting file do not seem to be affected.

To reproduce it, do some large md5deep run like md5deep -r -e . while
in your home or root directory and observe the terminal window.

There should be clean output.

Observed in Trusty.

** Affects: md5deep (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: md5deep

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328138

Title:
  md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/md5deep/+bug/1328138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1328138] Re: md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

2014-06-09 Thread Peer
The progress-meter also seems to be a bit strange. When working on a
longer file, it seems to display parts of other files, too, while
displaying the updating information.

In fact, I used a tee to create the file while at the same time
observing md5deeps output (that's why there was output while at the same
time creating a file with the output).

But spurious text displays also when using md5deep directly without
redirection or piping.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328138

Title:
  md5deep displays spuries text while computing checksums

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/md5deep/+bug/1328138/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1327762] [NEW] Update to 14.04 broke python cgi

2014-06-08 Thread Peer
Public bug reported:

I have a script using:

import BaseHTTPServer, CGIHTTPServer

[...]

handler_class.cgi_directories=['/cgi', '/cgi/tools']

with some cgis in /cgi and others in /cgi/tools.
All worked fine for years.

All the cgis in /cgi (like http://localhost:8002/cgi/test-cgi.py) contiue to 
work.
After the update, all the cgis in /cgi/tools (like 
http://localhost:8002/cgi/tools/test-cgi.py) don't work any more. The only 
response I get is this error:

Error response
Error code 403.
Message: CGI script is not a plain file ('/cgi/tools').
Error code explanation: 403 = Request forbidden -- authorization will not help.

Of course /cgi/tools is not a plain file, because it's a directory:

~/server-path/cgi$ ls -dl tools/
drwxr-xr-x 2 me me 4096 Jun  6  2013 tools/

So why did this break? How come that the directory /cgi/tools, although 
declared as cgi directory, has to be a plain file?
What changed from 13.10 to 14.04 to produce this?

** Affects: baloo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327762

Title:
  Update to 14.04 broke python cgi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/baloo/+bug/1327762/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1327762] Re: Update to 14.04 broke python cgi

2014-06-08 Thread Peer
Sorry, I postet this by error to baloo.
Don't know how to change the assignment, though. (And don't know where this 
belongs: python? kubuntu? update?)
Can somebody help with reassignment (or this bug), please?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1327762

Title:
  Update to 14.04 broke python cgi

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/baloo/+bug/1327762/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1289977] Re: Ubuntu 14.04 Update breaks grub, resulting in error: symbol 'grub_term_highlight_color' not found

2014-06-07 Thread Peer
I copied a hard disk with kubuntu 13.10 to a new (bigger) one with dd,
taking extra care to verify the copy with hashing it using md5sum. The
copy was fine.

It bootet correctly, everything behaved normally.

After the upgrade to 14.04, the system didn't boot any more because of
the error discussed in this thread.

It could be made to run normally with the methods suggested somewhere in
this thread, e.g. booting from a Live system (debian based that one),
mounting relevant partitions, chrooting, rewriting the boot sector as
described above, unmounting, rebooting.

So maybe this bug has to do with switching hard disk.

Is the installer creating some kind of hash or ID of the disk in order
to determine it's course of action in some branches of it's code
execution? This might be the reason for the breaking of the update in my
case.

I had same data on a new disk.
If some hash/ID of the HD (as an individual HD) informs the installer that I 
switched the disk and that for that reason it shall not write the complete set 
of parts of the updated grub, then this is the reason why it failed in my case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1289977

Title:
  Ubuntu 14.04 Update breaks grub, resulting in error: symbol
  'grub_term_highlight_color' not found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1289977/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1323397] Re: sbackup doesn't show backup progress in notification area

2014-06-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. What desktop
environment are you  using? Could you please also add a logfile from
your backup run? Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1323397

Title:
  sbackup doesn't show backup progress in notification area

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1323397/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1315638] Re: upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

2014-05-04 Thread Peer-Dominik Schmitz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1069133 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1069133

Thats it! I have done it and it worked!
Thanks for the quick help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315638

Title:
  upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1315638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1315638] [NEW] upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

2014-05-03 Thread Peer-Dominik Schmitz
Public bug reported:

Es konnte nicht ermittelt werden, welche Systemaktualisierungen
verfügbar sind

Ein unlösbares Problem trat beim Berechnen der Aktualisierung auf.

 Dies kann verursacht worden sein duch:
 * Aktualisieren auf eine Vorabversion von Ubuntu
 * Verwendung der aktuellen Vorabversion von Ubuntu
 * Inoffizielle Softwarepakete, die nicht von Ubuntu bereitgestellt wurden

I looked into the log, but I am not an expert. 
What shall I do?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:0.205.6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.11.0-20.34-generic 3.11.10.6
Uname: Linux 3.11.0-20-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.12.5-0ubuntu2.2
Architecture: amd64
CrashDB: ubuntu
Date: Sat May  3 12:19:39 2014
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-14 (77 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
MarkForUpload: True
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to saucy on 2014-05-03 (0 days ago)
VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade saucy third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1315638

Title:
  upgrade from 13.10 to 14.04LTS fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1315638/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1203991] Re: sbackup backuo on external usb drive not possible

2014-03-13 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1181056 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1181056
   TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203991

Title:
  sbackup backuo on external usb drive not possible

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1203991/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1181056] Re: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2014-03-13 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056

Title:
  TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1181056/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

2014-03-07 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Please sponsor.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1181056] Re: TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

2014-03-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for your interest and care in sbackup. Please note that
sbackup is not abondonware but FOSS and always in the need of help from
its users, contributors etc. Often there is a lack of time due to jobs
and real life. I'm sure you do understand.

Currently, I'm waiting for FFe and sponsoring to get 0.11.6 into
Trusty's archive. Feel free to comment on LP: #1286532 in order to
emphasize the urge for getting this version into the next Ubuntu LTS.

Thank you for your understanding. Any help in the form of packaging and
uploading, bug triaging, documentation, patches and so on is welcome and
highly appreciated. Just get in touch if you have resources available.
I'd be very happy.

Best regards,
Jean-Peer

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181056

Title:
  TypeError: coercing to Unicode: need string or buffer, NoneType found

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1181056/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

2014-03-02 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Summary changed:

- New upstream release 0.11.6
+ New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: sbackup
  
  Please grant a Feature Freeze exception.
  
- This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream release,
- in particular:
+ This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream
+ incremental bugfix release, in particular:
  
  * removes 'backup upgrade' feature and 'rebase snapshot' feature which can 
cause *severe* user data loss.
  * adds restore utility which provides legacy support using the 0.10.5 
lgorithm to access backups created with old versions of this software.
  * fixes a very annoying bug introduced in Saucy related to 
GtkFileChooserButton (see 
http://askubuntu.com/questions/159413/gtkfilechooserbutton-select-folder-mode-returns-no-path).
  * fixes for some security related bugs, such as LP: #785512 Backup files are 
not protected from local user access: make the snapshot directories RWX only by 
owner and LP: #785495 to make the temp directory RWX only by owner instead of 
by all.
  * many more bug fixes.
  
  This package has been tested thoroughly and contains no flaws. It builds
  on Trusty, installs and upgrades. Testing was done by means of a PPA and
  locally, the upstream release is in public use since 09/2013.
  
  Please find attached following documents:
  * upstream changelog diff
  * full build log on trusty buildd
  * install log on trusty
  * screenshot of GUI with replaced FileChooserButton
  * screenshot of GUI of legacy-restore tool
  * upstream release tarball, published at 
https://launchpad.net/sbackup/0.11/0.11.6/+download/sbackup_0.11.6.tar.gz
  * source package version 0.11.6
  * debdiff of source package 0.11.6 and package present in trusty (0.11.4)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream bugfix release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_source.changes
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002206/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_source.changes

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: Screenshot of GUI with replaced FileChooserButton
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002200/+files/GUI_with_replaced_FileChooserButton.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: Upstream tarball
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002203/+files/sbackup_0.11.6.orig.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: Build log on Trusty builddaemon
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002198/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-trusty-i386.sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1_UPLOADING.buildlog.xz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002204/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Patch added: Debdiff of new version
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002202/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] [NEW] New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: sbackup

Please grant a Feature Freeze exception.

This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream release,
in particular:

* removes 'backup upgrade' feature and 'rebase snapshot' feature which can 
cause *severe* user data loss.
* adds restore utility which provides legacy support using the 0.10.5 lgorithm 
to access backups created with old versions of this software.
* fixes a very annoying bug introduced in Saucy related to GtkFileChooserButton 
(see 
http://askubuntu.com/questions/159413/gtkfilechooserbutton-select-folder-mode-returns-no-path).
* fixes for some security related bugs, such as LP: #785512 Backup files are 
not protected from local user access: make the snapshot directories RWX only by 
owner and LP: #785495 to make the temp directory RWX only by owner instead of 
by all.
* many more bug fixes.

This package has been tested thoroughly and contains no flaws. It builds
on Trusty, installs and upgrades. Testing was done by means of a PPA and
locally, the upstream release is in public use since 09/2013.

Please find attached following documents:
* upstream changelog diff
* full build log on trusty buildd
* install log on trusty
* screenshot of GUI with replaced FileChooserButton
* screenshot of GUI of legacy-restore tool
* upstream release tarball, published at 
https://launchpad.net/sbackup/0.11/0.11.6/+download/sbackup_0.11.6.tar.gz
* source package version 0.11.6
* debdiff of source package 0.11.6 and package present in trusty (0.11.4)

** Affects: sbackup (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: Diff of upstream changelogs
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532/+attachment/4002189/+files/changelog.diff

** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: sbackup
  
  Please grant a Feature Freeze exception.
  
  This is necessary as many bugs are being fixed in this upstream release,
  in particular:
  
- * removes 'backup upgrade' feature and 'rebase snapshot' feature which
-   can cause *severe* user data loss.
- * adds restore utility which provides legacy support using the 0.10.5 
algorithm
-   to access backups created with old versions of this software.
- * fixes a very annoying bug introduced in Saucy related to 
GtkFileChooserButton
-   (see 
http://askubuntu.com/questions/159413/gtkfilechooserbutton-select-folder-mode-returns-no-path).
- * fixes for some security related bugs, such as LP: #785512 Backup files are
-   not protected from local user access: make the snapshot directories RWX only
-   by owner and LP: #785495 to make the temp directory RWX only by owner
-   instead of by all.
+ * removes 'backup upgrade' feature and 'rebase snapshot' feature which can 
cause *severe* user data loss.
+ * adds restore utility which provides legacy support using the 0.10.5 
lgorithm to access backups created with old versions of this software.
+ * fixes a very annoying bug introduced in Saucy related to 
GtkFileChooserButton (see 
http://askubuntu.com/questions/159413/gtkfilechooserbutton-select-folder-mode-returns-no-path).
+ * fixes for some security related bugs, such as LP: #785512 Backup files are 
not protected from local user access: make the snapshot directories RWX only by 
owner and LP: #785495 to make the temp directory RWX only by owner instead of 
by all.
  * many more bug fixes.
  
- 
- This package has been tested thoroughly and contains no flaws. It
- builds on Trusty, installs and upgrades. Testing was done by means of a PPA
- and locally, the upstream release is in public use since 09/2013.
+ This package has been tested thoroughly and contains no flaws. It builds
+ on Trusty, installs and upgrades. Testing was done by means of a PPA and
+ locally, the upstream release is in public use since 09/2013.
  
  Please find attached following documents:
  * upstream changelog diff
  * full build log on trusty buildd
  * install log on trusty
  * screenshot of GUI with replaced FileChooserButton
  * screenshot of GUI of legacy-restore tool
  * upstream release tarball, published at 
https://launchpad.net/sbackup/0.11/0.11.6/+download/sbackup_0.11.6.tar.gz
  * source package version 0.11.6
  * debdiff of source package 0.11.6 and package present in trusty (0.11.4)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: Log of installation on Trusty
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002199/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-install_on_trusty.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.dsc
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002205/+files/sbackup_0.11.6-0ubuntu1.dsc

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Attachment added: Screenshot of GUI of legacy-restore tool
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+attachment/4002201/+files/legacy-restore-gui.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1286532] Re: New upstream release 0.11.6

2014-03-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/sbackup

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1286532

Title:
  New upstream release 0.11.6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/1286532/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1244320] Re: Sbackup crashes on startup in Kubuntu 13.04

2014-02-26 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1174124 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174124

** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1258743
   initial install of sbackup - 1st setup use  failed?
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1174124
   Error when destination path is changed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1244320

Title:
  Sbackup crashes on startup in Kubuntu 13.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/1244320/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1282509] Re: xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in xfce_desktop_refresh()

2014-02-24 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Happens for me with a fresh install of Xubuntu daily build as of
2014/02/22 in VM (virtualbox i386).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1282509

Title:
  xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in xfce_desktop_refresh()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/xfdesktop/+bug/1282509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 330680] Re: SBackup fails if target path contains #

2013-01-23 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330680

Title:
  SBackup fails if target path contains #

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/330680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 609814] Re: Exception when selecting the Use recommended settings: NoOptionError

2013-01-10 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609814

Title:
  Exception when selecting the Use recommended settings: NoOptionError

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/609814/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 113864] Re: Display password in cleartext

2013-01-10 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
This should be fixed in sbackup series 0.11.4 and newer. Please feel
free to re-open the issue if you want to comment or if the issue is
still valid. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/113864

Title:
  Display password in cleartext

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/113864/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 773815] Re: package sbackup 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-01-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Does this also
happens when upgragding to more recent distributions (12.10 or 13.04)?
Thanks for any additional information - otherwise I'll close this bug.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773815

Title:
  package sbackup 0.11.4-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned
  error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/773815/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 567328] Re: [Feature request] Sort files by name in restore dialog

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Also affects: sbackup/0.10
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sbackup/0.11
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sbackup/trunk
   Importance: Wishlist
   Status: Confirmed

** Changed in: sbackup/0.11
   Status: New = Won't Fix

** Changed in: sbackup/0.10
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/567328

Title:
  [Feature request] Sort files by name in restore dialog

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/567328/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 568384] Re: sbackup uses too much memory

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Also affects: sbackup/0.11
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: sbackup/trunk
   Importance: Wishlist
 Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
   Status: In Progress

** Changed in: sbackup/0.11
   Status: New = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568384

Title:
  sbackup uses too much memory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/568384/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 906044] Re: admin terminal opened with sbackup and blocked

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue.

Please note, the error message you have encountered is a warning and
can be safely ignored. In case there are more issues please provide more
comprehensive information.

Thank you in advance.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/906044

Title:
  admin terminal opened with sbackup and blocked

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/906044/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 898271] Re: sbackup was configurated but didn't do the backup. It display that the destination folder don't exist

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting your problem.

Did you checked the permissions of your destination folder? Does the
problem still exists?

Thanks for further information in case your problem is still valid.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/898271

Title:
  sbackup was configurated but didn't do the backup. It display that the
  destination folder don't exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/898271/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 330680] Re: SBackup fails if target path contains #

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
A fix for this issue was pushed into repository series 0.11.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330680

Title:
  SBackup fails if target path contains #

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/330680/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407280] Re: too many incremental backups are deleted

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407280

Title:
  too many incremental backups are deleted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/407280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 357498] Re: sbackup doesn't remove all Regex Exclude rules

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357498

Title:
  sbackup doesn't remove all Regex Exclude rules

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/357498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 345949] Re: Single directory exclude not working if backing up root

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345949

Title:
  Single directory exclude not working if backing up root

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/345949/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 336452] Re: if you add file or directory in include tab, after having changed some of the entries, you have to save and the reload sbackup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336452

Title:
  if you add file or directory in include tab, after having changed some
  of the entries,  you have to save and the reload sbackup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/336452/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 675298] Re: sbackup doesn't honor regex excludes on full backup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I am closing this report since it is fixed in latest version of sbackup
0.11.x. Please upgrade to the latest version.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/675298

Title:
  sbackup doesn't honor regex excludes on full backup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/675298/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 661746] Re: Error in stream protocol: End of stream

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
I'm setting the status of this report to confirmed since it affects
multiple users.

Unfortunately, I was not able to reproduce the error so far.

@cuby: Would you mind to post your full log file (debug mode) please?

I start to think it is related to some timing issue...help in tracking
this down is *highly* appreciated. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/661746

Title:
  Error in stream protocol: End of stream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/661746/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 223073] Re: Simple backup through ssh crashes at startup

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/223073

Title:
  Simple backup through ssh crashes at startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/223073/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 146618] Re: The file size limitation should not be a recommendation

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x
Please upgrade. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146618

Title:
  The file size limitation should not be a recommendation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+bug/146618/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 116076] Re: sbackup using remote target fails ungracefully over wireless connection (with gnome-vfs-modules-CRITICAL error)

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116076

Title:
  sbackup using remote target fails ungracefully over wireless
  connection (with gnome-vfs-modules-CRITICAL error)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/116076/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 126280] Re: sbackup time option simple time is obscure

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x
Please upgrade. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126280

Title:
  sbackup time option simple time is obscure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/126280/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 336240] Re: sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x
Please upgrade. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336240

Title:
  sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/336240/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384362] Re: No clear way to enter a password containing the '@' character in Simple Backup Utility

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384362

Title:
  No clear way to enter a password containing the '@' character in
  Simple Backup Utility

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/384362/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 384359] Re: Simple Backup Utility may prompt user for password to remote server but not remember it

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thank you for using sbackup and reporting this issue. Can you please
test whether the problem still exists when using the latest version of
sbackup 0.11.4? Thank you so much.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/384359

Title:
  Simple Backup Utility may prompt user for password to remote server
  but not remember it

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/384359/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 249292] Re: Exclude regex for Trash does not include location used in Gnome =2.22

2013-01-03 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
The issue was fixed in sbackup series 0.11.x
Please upgrade. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

** Changed in: sbackup/0.10
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249292

Title:
  Exclude regex for Trash does not include location used in Gnome =2.22

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/249292/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected

2013-01-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577

Title:
  Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no
  file selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/653577/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location

2013-01-01 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
A fix for this was released in sbackup 0.11.3. I am closing this bug for
now, feel free to re-open it if still valid. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754

Title:
  Can't mount ftp location

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/648754/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 645543] Re: Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup

2012-11-11 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
This bug was fixed in the version 0.11.3 of sbackup

** Changed in: sbackup
   Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645543

Title:
  Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no
  incremental backup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/645543/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1014240] Re: [Asus eeepc 1225B] Keyboard and Touchpad randomly not working at startup

2012-08-22 Thread Peer
I have an Asus 1005HA and the same problem (no keyboard and touchpad funktion). 
I tried the solution above, without success.
First time I started the computer it worked, but afterwards not. I tried the 
Live-CD for first time and it worked. But not anymore.
Anyway the problem appears as well after closing the display. To reawake the 
computer I press a button on the keyboard but after Ubuntu comes back, there's 
no funktion. 
It's really courios, the first times I had success by clearing the CMOS. But 
not anymore.

For me seems like an hardware problem as well as the previous netbook-user had 
the same problem with windows.
Pf - does anybody has an idea? 

Thanks

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1014240

Title:
  [Asus eeepc 1225B] Keyboard and Touchpad randomly not working  at
  startup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1014240/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 207473] Re: Screen brightness double level changes on Dell laptops

2011-10-23 Thread Andreas Peer
I'm also still experiencing this bug in 11.10, although now the brightness 
level changes by 3 steps instead of 2 when pressing the brighntess-up/down key 
once.
It's interesting that this happens just after login in. On the login screen 
(LightDM) it's working fine, so maybe it's still a gnome-related bug?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207473

Title:
  Screen brightness double level changes on Dell laptops

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/207473/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 877905] Re: [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packages to versions in USN-1232-1

2011-10-20 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for the quick fix, works for me (on Lucid). Everything is back to
normal.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905

Title:
  [lucid] glx regression after upgrading xorg-server packages to
  versions in USN-1232-1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-server/+bug/877905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 877905] Re: After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly

2011-10-19 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Having the same issue on intel graphics, see enclosed xorg.log.

** Attachment added: xorg log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/877905/+attachment/2561149/+files/Xorg.0.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/877905

Title:
  After upgrading Xserver video does not work properly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/877905/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 224131] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224131

Title:
  simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/224131/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 221603] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with error in _compile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221603

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with error in _compile()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/221603/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 222566] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in rmtree()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222566

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in rmtree()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/222566/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 730514] Re: python2.6 crashed with IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/730514

Title:
  python2.6 crashed with IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/730514/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 441091] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with EOFError: End of file

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441091

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with EOFError: End of file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/441091/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 283257] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with NotPermittedError in delete()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/283257

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with NotPermittedError in delete()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/283257/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 250024] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250024

Title:
  simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/250024/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 230834] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in do_backup()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/230834

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with OSError in do_backup()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/230834/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 239257] Re: sbackup / tar -xcvfz will lockup Hardy

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239257

Title:
  sbackup / tar -xcvfz will lockup Hardy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/239257/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 225437] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in module()

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225437

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in module()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/225437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 766185] Re: annoying modal dialog pops up if destination directory does not exist

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
This is a valid feature request, comments are welcome.

Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Opinion

** Summary changed:

- annoying modal dialog pops up if destination directory does not exist
+ [wishlist] add setting to supress pops up if destination directory does not 
exist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/766185

Title:
  [wishlist] add setting to supress pops up if destination directory
  does not exist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/766185/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 754628] Re: unable to restore home folder with with sbackup

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.

This bug was introduced in version 0.11.3 which is packaged in Ubuntu
10.10. It is fixed in sbackup 0.11.4 in current Ubuntu releases. Please
update. (Altenatively, you can use sbackup's latest version from our
PPA, have a look at the project's launchpad page.)

Thank you.


** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/754628

Title:
  unable to restore home folder with with sbackup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/754628/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 336240] Re: sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Valid for sbackup series 0.10. However, needs verification of both bug
and patch. Anyhow, setting the status to confirmed.

** Summary changed:

- sbackup ignores maxsize setting
+ sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336240

Title:
  sbackup 0.10.5 ignores maxsize setting

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/336240/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 802111] Re: Restore shows files in gray

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.

Could you please specify, what version of Ubuntu and sbackup you are using.
I was not able to fully understand your issue. I'd appreciate, if you could 
post a screenshot or similar.

Thank you.


** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802111

Title:
  Restore shows files in gray

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/802111/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 108317] Re: [Wishlist] Sbackup should be able to revert my datas to a certain state

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Opinion

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108317

Title:
  [Wishlist] Sbackup should be able to revert my datas to a certain
  state

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/108317/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 275258] Re: Sbackup wont exclude directories in UPPER Case

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using newer releases of 
sbackup (0.10.5 in Lucid/0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275258

Title:
  Sbackup wont exclude directories in UPPER Case

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/275258/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 231619] Re: loading backup

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4)?
If this issue still exists please feel free to reopen it. Thank you.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231619

Title:
  loading backup

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/231619/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 312945] Re: sbackupd lock file generation is not atomic

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312945

Title:
  sbackupd lock file generation is not atomic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/312945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 116743] Re: Sbackup should exclude its own backups

2011-10-05 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Does this still happen with newer releases of sbackup (0.10.5 resp. 0.11.4)?
Please feel free to reopen it if it still exists. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/116743

Title:
  Sbackup should exclude its own backups

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/116743/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 609814] Re: Exception when selecting the Use recommended settings: NoOptionError

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Please upgrade to our latest release. Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup/0.10
   Status: Confirmed = Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609814

Title:
  Exception when selecting the Use recommended settings: NoOptionError

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/sbackup/+bug/609814/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 227642] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with RuntimeError in normpath()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4).
Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227642

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with RuntimeError in normpath()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/227642/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 224131] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4).
Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224131

Title:
  simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with IOError in copyfile()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/224131/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 197031] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with AccessDeniedError in delete()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4).
Thanks in advance.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197031

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with AccessDeniedError in delete()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/197031/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 216416] Re: sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in do_add_file()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4).
Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/216416

Title:
  sbackupd.py crashed with IOError in do_add_file()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/216416/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 231841] Re: simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with OSError in cmp()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231841

Title:
  simple-restore-gnome.py crashed with OSError in cmp()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/231841/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 225176] Re: simple-backup-config.py crashed with TypeError in isdir()

2011-10-04 Thread Jean-Peer Lorenz
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make sbackup better.
Could you please test whether this bug is still valid using the latest release 
of sbackup (0.11.4).
Thanks.

** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225176

Title:
  simple-backup-config.py crashed with TypeError in isdir()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/225176/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


  1   2   3   4   >