[Bug 1516771] [NEW] Sync guilt 0.36-1 from Debian
Public bug reported: Version 0.36 of guilt has been released a while ago, and Debian have now released 0.36-0.1: https://packages.debian.org/sid/guilt Please include this version in Ubuntu. ** Affects: guilt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1516771 Title: Sync guilt 0.36-1 from Debian To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guilt/+bug/1516771/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1247757] Re: expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory
** Attachment added: The trigger2.expect file as an attachment https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expect/+bug/1247757/+attachment/3899625/+files/trigger2.expect -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247757 Title: expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expect/+bug/1247757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1247757] [NEW] expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory
Public bug reported:
The ecases_remove_by_expi() function in expect.c uses memcpy() to shift
elements down. The areas can be overlapping. When they are, the
construct is non-portable and can lead to memory corruption.
Please replace the memcpy call with a memmove call. That fixes the
issue. I have attached a proposed patch.
I have already reported this issue at Debian: http://bugs.debian.org
/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728663
Debian has accepted the patch.
I have also reported it upstream:
https://sourceforge.net/p/expect/patches/16/
The following script demonstrates the problem. Save it in a file called
trigger2.expect and run the following:
$ valgrind expect trigger2.expect
You will see an error message similar to:
==10665== Source and destination overlap in memcpy(0x60b9170, 0x60b9178, 16)
==10665==at 0x4C2E820: memcpy@@GLIBC_2.14 (in
/usr/lib/valgrind/vgpreload_memcheck-amd64-linux.so)
(Note: it seems that valgrind 3.7 does not detect this, but valgrind
3.8.1 does detect it.)
---cut here for trigger2.expect---
#!/usr/bin/env expect
spawn cat
set a $spawn_id
spawn sleep 1
set b $spawn_id
set spawn_id $a
expect_after {
-i $a full_buffer { }
-i $b full_buffer { }
timeout { }
}
expect eof { }
---cut here for trigger2.expect---
It would be nice if this fix was backported to versions of Ubuntu that
are still supported with updates.
** Affects: expect (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: patch patch-accepted-debian testcase
** Patch added: Suggested fix.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247757/+attachment/3899624/+files/expect5.45-memmove.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247757
Title:
expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expect/+bug/1247757/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1247757] Re: expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory
** Tags added: patch-accepted-upstream -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1247757 Title: expect uses memcpy instead of memmove to copy overlapping memory To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expect/+bug/1247757/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 947432] Re: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV during login, with XBMC autostarting
** Visibility changed to: Public -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/947432 Title: compiz crashed with SIGSEGV during login, with XBMC autostarting To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/947432/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 822910] Re: 6.06 upgrade fails due to bad repo?
Robb, you did not describe exactly what happened when you attempted to upgrade. I'm having trouble upgrading a 8.10 server, and the root cause of both our problems may be that the UpgradeTool of http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release points to non-existing URLs for both 8.10 and 6.06. When I run sudo do-release-upgrade I get the following output: Checking for a new ubuntu release Failed Upgrade tool signature Failed Upgrade tool Done downloading extracting 'jaunty.tar.gz' Failed to extract Extracting the upgrade failed. There may be a problem with the network or with the server. Not very helpful. Using strace I'm able to retrive the real error messages: sudo strace -f -s 7 -o /tmp/release.strace do-release-upgrade Afterwards, in the /tmp/release.strace file I can see that it fetches the meta-release file and stores it in /var/lib/update-manager/meta-release. It seems to try to use the UpgradeTool URL from that file to retrieve jaunty.tar.gz. I see this error message: 28281 ... read resumed 400 URI Failure\nURI: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/jaunty-proposed/main/dist- upgrader-all/0.111.8/jaunty.tar.gz\nMessage: 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.88.45 80]\nFailReason: HttpError404\n\n, 64000) = 192 If I change the URI of /etc/update-manager/meta-release from http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release to http://www.lysator.liu.se/~ceder/tmp/meta-old (where I have blindly replaced all archive with old-releases) things work slightly better. The jaunty.tar.gz file is accepted. But after a while I get these messages: Hit http://old-releases.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/universe Packages Hit http://old-releases.ubuntu.com intrepid-security/multiverse Packages Done downloading Reading package lists: Done Reading state information: Done Reading state information: Done Reading state information: Done Updating repository information No valid mirror found While scanning your repository information no mirror entry for the upgrade was found.This can happen if you run a internal mirror or if the mirror information is out of date. Do you want to rewrite your 'sources.list' file anyway? If you choose 'Yes' here it will update all 'intrepid' to 'jaunty' entries. If you select 'no' the update will cancel. Continue [yN] If I restore the /etc/update-manager/meta-release file and run this echo 91.189.88.140 archive.ubuntu.com | sudo tee -a /etc/hosts things work even better. The IP address actually belongs to old-releases.ubuntu.com. Now I get all the way to Do you want to start the upgrade? 1 package is going to be removed. 57 new packages are going to be installed. 828 packages are going to be upgraded. You have to download a total of 430M. This download will take about 7 minutes with your connection. Fetching and installing the upgrade can take several hours. Once the download has finished, the process cannot be cancelled. Continue [yN] Details [d] ...and here I bail out because I cannot actually update the server until the service window on 2011-08-15. Sorry to spam if this was totally irrelevant to the original problem. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/822910 Title: 6.06 upgrade fails due to bad repo? To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/822910/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 545398] Re: lucid's motd text not updated
I think this is a duplicate of https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sysvinit/+bug/659738. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545398 Title: lucid's motd text not updated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612523] Re: Severe performance regression due to glob gate
I see that a fixed version is available in Ubuntu 11.04. Great! It would be even greater if the fix was backported to all the supported Ubuntu versions, at least the LTS versions. This issue blocks the testsuite of lyskomd (http://www.lysator.liu.se/lyskom/lyskom-server/). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612523 Title: Severe performance regression due to glob gate -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725226] [NEW] package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid I got the error while doing a normal upgrade using the Upgrade Manager. Running sudo service squid stop sudo service squid start seems to work, so this seems to bi intermittent. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 25 20:58:03 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: squid Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725226 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 725226] Re: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725226 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 725226] [NEW] package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: squid I got the error while doing a normal upgrade using the Upgrade Manager. Running sudo service squid stop sudo service squid start seems to work, so this seems to bi intermittent. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-28.55-generic 2.6.32.27+drm33.12 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-28-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Feb 25 20:58:03 2011 ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 SourcePackage: squid Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** Affects: squid (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-package i386 lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725226 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 725226] Re: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/725226 Title: package squid 2.7.STABLE7-1ubuntu12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612523] Re: Severe performance regression due to glob gate
According to http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591695#15, this is fixed in Debian source-version 5.44.1.15-3. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #591695 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591695 -- Severe performance regression due to glob gate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612523] Re: Severe performance regression due to glob gate
The issue has now been fixed in the expect CVS repository, using one of my patches, slightly edited. This commit of retoglob.c fixes it: revision 5.6 date: 2010/08/27 22:24:33; author: hobbs; state: Exp; lines: +38 -0 * retoglob.c: Fail if the generated glob contains more than two asterisks. Fixes [Expect SF Bug 3010684] (cederqvist) For your backporting convenience, I attach the patch here. The upstream ChangeLog entry is: 2010-08-27 Jeff Hobbs je...@activestate.com * retoglob.c: Fail if the generated glob contains more than two asterisks. Fixes [Expect SF Bug 3010684] (cederqvist) ** Patch added: The solution that is applied upstream https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/expect/+bug/612523/+attachment/1537869/+files/two-asterisks.patch -- Severe performance regression due to glob gate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612523] [NEW] Severe performance regression due to glob gate
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: expect The gate keeper glob pattern matching added to expect on 2007-07-11 was intended to run a fast glob matching before invoking the slow regular expression. However, it turns out that for many regular expressions the generated glob pattern is extremely slow. I have seen it take several seconds, when the original regular expression took about a millisecond or less to execute. The attached script should take a millisecond or less to run. It does in expect 5.43.0. But in expect-5.44.1.14-5 it takes over a minute on my (old) laptop. I have reported this issue upstream at http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=113179aid=3010684group_id=13179 and that report contains a couple of propossed fixes. 1) Description:Ubuntu 10.04.1 LTS Release:10.04 2) expect: Installed: 5.44.1.14-5 Candidate: 5.44.1.14-5 Version table: *** 5.44.1.14-5 0 500 http://se.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 3) re matching should be as fast as it used to be. 4) re matching can be very slow. ** Affects: expect (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Severe performance regression due to glob gate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612523] Re: Severe performance regression due to glob gate
** Attachment added: Script that reproduces the problem. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/52877057/slow.exp -- Severe performance regression due to glob gate https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612523 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550474] Re: Bad handling of zero-length writes
I see now that this was fixed upstream in september 2005: http://expect.cvs.sourceforge.net/viewvc/expect/expect/exp_chan.c?r1=5.12r2=5.13 The fix is included in the Debian package 5.44.1.15-1 (and maybe earlier; I have not checked). I'd like this fix to be backported to the supported versions of Ubuntu. I hope it will make it into the next version of Ubuntu. -- Bad handling of zero-length writes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550474] [NEW] Bad handling of zero-length writes
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: expect expect writes this in the debug log: write() failed to write anything - will sleep(1) and retry... The cause is that ExpOutputProc() can be called with toWrite == 0. I will attach a patch that fixes the problem. The problem isn't easy to reproduce. I have not been able to create a small test case. But if you attempt to run the test suite of ftp://ftp.lysator.liu.se/pub/lyskom/server/lyskom-server-2.1.1.tar.gz.sig it will fail with strange locking errors. The errors disappear if you fix this expect bug. I have reported this to Don Libes but not gotten any response yet. This problem was apparently introduced when expect started to use non-blocking I/O. I'm using Ubuntu 9.10. This problem exists in all versions of expect 5.43.0: I'm using 5.43.0-17. (One could possibly argue that it is a TCL bug that ExpOutputProc() is called with 0 as argument. I have not investigated if it would make more sense to fix the problem there. Given that ExpOutputProc() checks if toWrite is less than 0, I think it makes sense that it also handles the case when toWrite is 0 in a sane way.) ** Affects: expect (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Bad handling of zero-length writes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 550474] Re: Bad handling of zero-length writes
** Patch added: Patch that fixes the problem. http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42310637/14-zero-len-write.dpatch -- Bad handling of zero-length writes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550474 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
